Next Article in Journal
The Mcgill University Department of Oncology: Structure Depicts the Shape of Evolving Knowledge
Previous Article in Journal
Adjuvant Hormonal Therapy for Stage I Endometrial Cancer
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Cost Burden of Trastuzumab and Bevacizumab Therapy for Solid Tumours in Canada

1
Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
2
Division of Medical Oncology, QEII Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada
3
Department of Pharmacy, QEII Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2008, 15(3), 136-142; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.v15i3.249
Submission received: 5 March 2008 / Revised: 6 April 2008 / Accepted: 7 May 2008 / Published: 1 June 2008

Abstract

Objective: Monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) such as trastuzumab and bevacizumab have become important yet expensive components of systemic cancer therapy across a variety of disease sites. We assessed the potential cost implications of adopting trastuzumab and bevacizumab therapy in the context of their potential utilization in breast, lung, and colorectal cancers. Design: We first estimated MAb costs per patient and treatment indication and then included the MAb acquisition cost and the costs of medical resource utilizations required for therapy delivery. Drug costs were based on 2005 average Canadian wholesale prices, assuming full drug delivery and uncomplicated cycles. A direct-payer perspective was undertaken, and results are reported in Canadian dollars. Potential lifetime costs were then derived according to constructed schema, which account for absolute numbers of target patients and systemic therapy utilization. We subsequently estimated costs of MAb therapy relative to total costs of conventional management without MAb therapy. Results: Trastuzumab costs $49,915 and $28,350 per patient treated in the adjuvant and metastatic breast cancer settings, respectively; bevacizumab costs $48,490 and $39,614 per patient treated in the metastatic lung and colorectal cancer settings, respectively. Potential lifetime absolute costs to Canada’s health care system were approximately $127 million and $299 million for trastuzumab and bevacizumab respectively, corresponding to an average increase in health care expenditure of approximately 19% for breast cancer and 21% for lung and colorectal cancer over conventional management without MAbs. Conclusions: Novel Mab-based therapies such as trastuzumab and bevacizumab will likely add a significant cost burden to Canada’s publicly funded health care system.
Keywords: health care costs; monoclonal antibodies; trastuzumab; bevacizumab; neoplasms health care costs; monoclonal antibodies; trastuzumab; bevacizumab; neoplasms

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Drucker, A.; Skedgel, C.; Virik, K.; Rayson, D.; Sellon, M.; Younis, T. The Cost Burden of Trastuzumab and Bevacizumab Therapy for Solid Tumours in Canada. Curr. Oncol. 2008, 15, 136-142. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.v15i3.249

AMA Style

Drucker A, Skedgel C, Virik K, Rayson D, Sellon M, Younis T. The Cost Burden of Trastuzumab and Bevacizumab Therapy for Solid Tumours in Canada. Current Oncology. 2008; 15(3):136-142. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.v15i3.249

Chicago/Turabian Style

Drucker, A., C. Skedgel, K. Virik, D. Rayson, M. Sellon, and T. Younis. 2008. "The Cost Burden of Trastuzumab and Bevacizumab Therapy for Solid Tumours in Canada" Current Oncology 15, no. 3: 136-142. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.v15i3.249

APA Style

Drucker, A., Skedgel, C., Virik, K., Rayson, D., Sellon, M., & Younis, T. (2008). The Cost Burden of Trastuzumab and Bevacizumab Therapy for Solid Tumours in Canada. Current Oncology, 15(3), 136-142. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.v15i3.249

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop