Next Article in Journal
Talking to Cancer Patients about Complementary Therapies: Is It the Physician’s Responsibility?
Previous Article in Journal
How Do We Evaluate Outcome in an Integrative Oncology Program?
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Principles to Guide Integrative Oncology and the Development of an Evidence Base

1
Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
2
Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2008, 15(s2), 83-87; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.v15i0.278
Submission received: 6 May 2008 / Revised: 3 June 2008 / Accepted: 10 July 2008 / Published: 1 August 2008

Abstract

Background: Integrative oncology uses both conventional and complementary medicine to meet the needs of individual patients and to focus on the whole person. The core principles of integrative oncology include individualization, holism, dynamism, synergism, and collaboration, but the nature of the evidence to guide the development of integrative oncology has been given little attention. Objectives: (1) To discuss the need for evidence to support the integration of complementary therapies for integrative oncology care. (2) To emphasize that the evidence base must be valid and respect the underlying principles of individual complementary therapies and integrative oncology practice. (3) To suggest ways to begin developing the evidence base. Review and Discussion: Although the evidence for safety and efficacy seems paramount for supporting the integration of an individual complementary therapy into mainstream cancer care, the need for evidence to support the overall practice of integrative oncology has to be considered as well. We argue that developing an evidence base for integrative oncology requires a contextual and comprehensive research approach that assesses a range of outcomes over a suitable period of time that the patient and the patient’s family, in addition to the health care providers, deem important. Conclusion: A whole-systems framework to the development of the evidence base for integrative oncology can guide the development of evidence that respects the complex nature of many complementary and integrative practices and their underlying principles of care delivery.
Keywords: integrative oncology; evidence-based medicine; randomized controlled trials; whole-systems research integrative oncology; evidence-based medicine; randomized controlled trials; whole-systems research

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Leis, A.M.; Weeks, L.C.; Verhoef, M.J. Principles to Guide Integrative Oncology and the Development of an Evidence Base. Curr. Oncol. 2008, 15, 83-87. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.v15i0.278

AMA Style

Leis AM, Weeks LC, Verhoef MJ. Principles to Guide Integrative Oncology and the Development of an Evidence Base. Current Oncology. 2008; 15(s2):83-87. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.v15i0.278

Chicago/Turabian Style

Leis, A. M., L. C. Weeks, and M. J. Verhoef. 2008. "Principles to Guide Integrative Oncology and the Development of an Evidence Base" Current Oncology 15, no. s2: 83-87. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.v15i0.278

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop