The Sustainability of the Fishery Industry and Environmental Development: A Study on Factor Market Distortions
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Research Methods
2.1. Analysis Method and Logical Framework
2.2. Calculation of Distortion Degree of Factor Prices in Marine Fisheries Market
2.2.1. Construction of Marine Fishery Production Function Model
2.2.2. Calculation of the Elastic Coefficient of Each Element of Marine Fishery
2.3. Factor Market Distortion and Fishery Industry Structure
- (1)
- Moore-like index
- (2)
- Industrial Structure Upgrading Index (Structural Upgrading)
3. Results Analysis
3.1. Calculation Results of Factor Price Distortion
3.2. Analysis of Fishery Industry Structure
3.3. Effect of Factor Market Distortion on Fishery Industrial Structure
3.3.1. Variable Calibration and Necessity Analysis
3.3.2. Configuration Analysis
4. Explanations Based on Empirical Analysis
4.1. Influence of Capital Factors and Its Status Quo of Distortion
4.2. Influence of Labor Factors and Its Status Quo of Distortion
4.3. The Influence and Distortion of Fishery Resource Elements
5. Discussions and Implementations
5.1. Improve the Quality of Labor Factors
5.2. Reasonably Allocate Capital Elements
5.3. Strengthen the Management of Marine Resource Elements
6. Conclusions, Limitations, and Implications
6.1. Conclusions
6.2. Limitations
6.3. Implications
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Yo, J.; Kong, H. The Rationality Evaluation of Spatial Arrangement of Marine Fishery Based on Marine Carrying Capacity Vision: Exemplify Shandong Blue Area. Econ. Geogr. 2014, 34, 112–117+123. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Li, B.; Jin, X.; Yang, J.; Han, Z.; Su, F. Spatio-temporal evolution and influencing factors for marine fisheries industry ecosystem vulnerability in China. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2019, 39, 4273–4283. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Han, Y. Marine Fishery Resources Management and Policy Adjustment in China Since 1949. Chin. Rural. Econ. 2018, 405, 14–28. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Liu, Z. Research on the Status, Causes and Governance of Marine Fishing Ground Desertification. Issues Agric. Econ. 2019, 474, 105–116. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Sun, K.; Zhou, X.; Su, Z.; Zhang, H. Dynamic Assessment and Spatial Differentiation of Sustainable Utilization of Marine Fishery Resources in China. Sci. Geogr. Sin. 2016, 36, 1172–1179. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Sun, K.; Ji, J.; Li, L.; Zhang, C.; Liu, J.; Fu, M. Marine Fishery Economic Efficiency and Its Spatio-Temporal Differences Based on Undesirable Outputs in China. Resour. Sci. 2017, 39, 2040–2051. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Wang, B.; Ni, G.; Han, L. Impact of the evolution of industry structure on the economic fluctuation of marine fishery. Resour. Sci. 2019, 41, 289–300. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Ren, C.; Wei, S.; You, X.; Li, W.; Zhou, Y. Comparison of Fishery Production Efficiency and Influencing Mechanism in Fujian and Taiwan Based on Double Open Conditions. Econ. Geogr. 2020, 40, 127–135. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Dong, X.; Yang, Y.; Zhuang, Q.; Xie, W.; Zhao, X. Does Environmental Regulation Help Mitigate Factor Misallocation?—Theoretical Simulations Based on a Dynamic General Equilibrium Model and the Perspective of TFP. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 3642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Huang, Q.; Wang, H.; Chen, C. The Influence of Government Regulation on Farmers’ Green Production Behavior—From the Perspective of the Market Structure. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, X.; Zheng, H. Environmental Concerns, Environmental Policy and Green Investment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Midrigan, V.; Xu, D.Y. Finance and Misallocation: Evidence from Plant-Level Data. Am. Econ. Rev. 2014, 104, 422–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hsieh, C.; Klenow, P.J. Misallocation and Manufacturing TFP in China and India. Q. J. Econ. 2009, 124, 1403–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brandt, L.; Tombe, T.; Zhu, X. Factor market distortions across time, space and sectors in China. Rev. Econ. Dyn. 2013, 16, 39–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clark, J.B. The Distribution of Wealth: A Theory of Wages, Interest and Profits; Economic Science Press: Beijing, China, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Wilson, D.J. Is Embodied Technology the Result of Upstream R&D? Industry-Level Evidence. Rev. Econ. Dyn. 2002, 5, 285–317. [Google Scholar]
- Yan, P.; Wang, B. Technical Efficiency, Technical Progress &Productivity Growth: An Empirical Analysis Based on DEA. Econ. Res. J. 2004, 12, 55–65. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Xia, X.; He, J.; Liu, J. Research Logic of Qualitative Comparative Analysis: On Its Implications for Economic Management Research. J. Financ. Econ. 2014, 40, 97–107. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Woodside, A.G.; Nagy, G.; Megehee, C.M. Applying complexity theory: A primer for identifying and modeling firm anomalies. J. Innov. Knowl. 2018, 3, 9–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fiss, P.C. A Set-Theoretic Approach to Organizational Configurations. Acad. Manag. Rev. 2007, 32, 1180–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ragin, C.C. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies; University of California Press: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 1987. [Google Scholar]
- Marx, A.; Rihoux, B.; Ragin, C. The origins, development and application of Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): The first 25 Years. Eur. Political Sci. Rev. 2013, 6, 115–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren, C.; Liu, L.; Chen, S. Comparative Analysis of Marxism’s production function and neoclassicism production function. Econ. Rev. 2008, 2, 15–21. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Solow, R.M. Essays on Economic Growth; Beijing Institute of Economics Press: Beijing, China, 1989. [Google Scholar]
- Zong, J.; Zhou, L. Market Segmentation Factor Distortion and Industry Upgrading—The Evidence from China (1998~2007). Bus. Manag. J. 2013, 35, 23–33. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Zheng, Z.; Liu, Y. Study on Industrial Structure Evolution under the Factors Price Distortions. China Econ. Stud. 2013, 3, 68–78. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Chen, P. Factor Price Distortions, Optimization of Industrial Structure and Market Access for Relaxing. Econ. Probl. 2016, 8, 42–45+55. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Moore, J.H. A Measure of Structural Change in Output. Rev. Income Wealth 1978, 12, 105–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, D. A theoretical explanation and verification of the determination and measurement of the industrial structure upgrading form. Public Financ. Res. 2008, 1, 46–49. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Y.; Pu, Y. Industrial Structure Evolution and Its Impact on Energy Intensity. Ind. Econ. Res. 2015, 2, 15–22+67. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Wang, N.; Shi, J. Measure the Degree of Factor Price Distortion in China. J. Quant. Tech. Econ. 2015, 32, 149–161. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Kang, Z. The Impacts of Catching-up Strategy and Factors Market Distortion on Chinese Employment: A Study Based on Chinese Enterprises-level Data. Chin. J. Popul. Sci. 2015, 32, 149–161. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Li, Y.; Sun, X. A Research on the Impact of Capital Market Distortion on Urban Total Factor Productivity: From the Perspective of Scale and Technology. J. Nanjing Audit. Univ. 2021, 18, 82–91. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Dickens, W.T.; Lang, K. The Reemergence of Segmented Labor Market Theory. Am. Econ. Rev. 1988, 78, 129–134. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, C.; Liu, W. Labor Market Distortion and Imbalance of China’s Macro-economy. Stat. Res. 2008, 5, 32–37. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Cai, F.; Du, Y.; Wang, M. Household Registration System and Labor Market Protection. Econ. Res. J. 2001, 12, 41–49+91. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Chen, Q.; Su, H.; Yu, X.; Hu, Q. Livelihood Vulnerability of Marine Fishermen to Multi-Stresses under the Vessel Buyback and Fishermen Transfer Programs in China: The Case of Zhoushan City, Zhejiang Province. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, X.; Zhang, J. Analysis of Fishery Labor Market Construction in China. Chin. Fish. Econ. 2014, 32, 5–11. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Li, Q. China’s Marine Fishery Resources Utilization and Protection of Policy Research; Ocean University of China: Qingdao, China, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Xia, X.; Li, J. Factor Price Heterogeneity Distortion and Dynamic Adjustment of Industrial Structure. J. Nanjing Univ. (Philos. Humanit. Soc. Sci.) 2012, 49, 40–48. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Han, G.; Hu, W. How Does Factor Price Distortion Affect China’s Industrial Overcapacity? Empirical Study Based on Provincial Panel Data. Ind. Econ. Res. 2017, 2, 49–61. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Chen, Q.; Han, L. The Fluctuation Features of Chinese Marine Fishing Production and Cause Analysis. Econ. Geogr. 2016, 215, 105–112. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, Z.; Shi, J. Analysis on Industrial Efficiency Loss of China’s Factors Market Distortion: An Empirical Study Based on DEA. China Ind. Econ. 2006, 10, 40–48. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Wang, J. Research on the Supply Side Structure Reform of Marine Capture Fisheries from the Perspective of Policy and Institutional Supply. Issues Agric. Econ. 2019, 479, 25–31. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Lu, Y. The Current Status and Developing Trends of Industry 4.0: A Review. Inf. Syst. Front. 2021, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, L.; Lu, Y.; Li, L. Embedding Blockchain Technology into IoT for Security: A Survey. IEEE Internet Things J. 2021, 8, 10452–10473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, Y. Implementing blockchain in information systems: A review. Enterp. Inf. Syst. 2022, 16, 1876–1907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, Y.; Xue, N. A vision of 6G–5G’s successor. J. Manag. Anal. Taylor Fr. J. 2020, 7, 301–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ye, Z.; Lu, Y. Quantum science: A review and current research trends. J. Manag. Anal. 2022, 9, 383–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Year | DisL | DisK | DisR |
---|---|---|---|
1999 | 0.6877 | 258.0876 | 0.4688 |
2000 | 0.6462 | 208.5443 | 0.4840 |
2001 | 0.5053 | 213.0883 | 0.4668 |
2002 | 0.5358 | 178.1359 | 0.5043 |
2003 | 0.2821 | 108.9391 | 0.4593 |
2004 | 0.2731 | 48.7149 | 0.4374 |
2005 | 0.2690 | 43.0393 | 0.4523 |
2006 | 0.2498 | 39.7871 | 0.5070 |
2007 | 0.1244 | 39.2617 | 0.4328 |
2008 | 0.2267 | 179.9414 | 0.2642 |
2009 | 0.3913 | 170.7733 | 0.7366 |
2010 | 0.2883 | 126.6691 | 0.4338 |
2011 | 0.2361 | 69.3258 | 0.4171 |
2012 | 0.2660 | 57.8301 | 0.4430 |
2013 | 0.2736 | 54.0333 | 0.4630 |
2014 | 0.2873 | 50.8854 | 0.4768 |
2015 | 0.4217 | 52.4845 | 0.4832 |
2016 | 1.3962 | 54.6509 | 0.4789 |
2017 | 1.3980 | 51.5971 | 0.4564 |
2018 | 1.500 | 43.3481 | 0.5110 |
2019 | 1.4808 | 40.2320 | 0.4908 |
Year | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2001 | 0.1971 | 0.7873 | 0.8539 | 0.7496 | 0.0645 |
2002 | 0.2290 | 0.7771 | 0.8310 | 0.8326 | 0.0335 |
2003 | 0.2732 | 0.7633 | 0.7990 | 0.8799 | 0.0981 |
2004 | 0.3112 | 0.7588 | 0.7672 | 0.9857 | 0.0178 |
2005 | 0.3274 | 0.7546 | 0.7554 | 1.0031 | 0.0283 |
2006 | 0.3485 | 0.7426 | 0.7470 | 1.0325 | 0.0194 |
2007 | 0.3667 | 0.7307 | 0.7413 | 1.0534 | 0.0190 |
2008 | 0.3678 | 0.7255 | 0.7454 | 1.0731 | −0.0243 |
2009 | 0.3683 | 0.7320 | 0.7384 | 1.0494 | 0.0366 |
2010 | 0.5391 | 0.7365 | 0.5321 | 1.0189 | −0.0116 |
2011 | 0.7332 | 0.7359 | 0.3697 | 0.9995 | −0.0026 |
2012 | 0.7330 | 0.7364 | 0.3694 | 0.9968 | 0.0024 |
2013 | 0.7302 | 0.7373 | 0.3714 | 0.9993 | 0.0055 |
2014 | 0.7263 | 0.7400 | 0.3727 | 0.9980 | 0.0029 |
2015 | 0.5389 | 0.7413 | 0.5295 | 1.0173 | 0.0147 |
2016 | 0.3917 | 0.7419 | 0.7058 | 1.0829 | 0.0308 |
2017 | 0.4028 | 0.7434 | 0.6937 | 1.1062 | 0.0061 |
2018 | 0.4046 | 0.7515 | 0.6835 | 1.1067 | 0.0131 |
2019 | 0.4094 | 0.7548 | 0.6754 | 1.1117 | 0.0074 |
DisL | 0.6597 | 0.6639 | 0.6257 | 0.6944 | 0.6125 | 0.6806 |
~DisL | 0.6855 | 0.7588 | 0.7161 | 0.7506 | 0.6718 | 0.6477 |
DisK | 0.5306 | 0.8513 | 0.4951 | 0.8849 | 0.4490 | 0.8657 |
~DisK | 0.7562 | 0.5000 | 0.7593 | 0.4463 | 0.7794 | 0.3980 |
DisR | 0.6291 | 0.6616 | 0.6375 | 0.6586 | 0.6422 | 0.6172 |
~DisR | 0.6119 | 0.6335 | 0.6277 | 0.6867 | 0.6279 | 0.6946 |
DisL | 0.6797 | 0.5996 | 0.6633 | 0.5965 | 0.7627 | 0.6089 |
~DisL | 0.6719 | 0.7141 | 0.6757 | 0.7336 | 0.6385 | 0.7520 |
DisK | 0.7377 | 0.6145 | 0.6892 | 0.6930 | 0.7354 | 0.6436 |
~DisK | 0.5926 | 0.6803 | 0.6565 | 0.6436 | 0.6174 | 0.6737 |
DisR | 0.7377 | 0.6195 | 0.6914 | 0.6601 | 0.7702 | 0.6011 |
~DisR | 0.6105 | 0.6912 | 0.6712 | 0.6930 | 0.6422 | 0.6011 |
DisL | ⊗ | • | - | ⊗ | • | ⊗ | - | ⊗ | • | |
DisK | - | |||||||||
DisR | - | ⊗ | • | - | ⊗ | • | - | • | ⊗ | |
Consistency | 0.8617 | 0.8495 | 0.7922 | 0.8957 | 0.8382 | 0.8046 | 0.8738 | 0.9774 | 0.7996 | 0.7817 |
Raw coverage | 0.7562 | 0.5222 | 0.5222 | 0.7593 | 0.5563 | 0.5793 | 0.5851 | 0.5686 | 0.4753 | 0.5311 |
Unique coverage | 0.7562 | 0.2119 | 0.2119 | 0.7593 | 0.2020 | 0.2251 | 0.1372 | 0.1207 | 0.2091 | 0.2649 |
Solution consistency | 0.8617 | 0.7731 | 0.8957 | 0.7813 | 0.8894 | 0.8111 | ||||
Solution coverage | 0.7562 | 0.7342 | 0.7593 | 0.7997 | 0.7058 | 0.7402 |
DisL | - | • | - | ⊗ | |||||||
DisK | • | ⊗ | • | • | - | ||||||
DisR | • | ⊗ | - | • | - | ⊗ | - | • | |||
Consistency | 0.8419 | 0.8620 | 0.8654 | 0.8880 | 0.8863 | 0.8825 | 0.8516 | 0.8131 | 0.8540 | 0.8375 | 0.8712 |
Raw coverage | 0.5290 | 0.5100 | 0.4612 | 0.5000 | 0.5619 | 0.4693 | 0.5285 | 0.4627 | 0.6683 | 0.6793 | 0.4156 |
Unique coverage | 0.5290 | 0.1783 | 0.1295 | 0.2432 | 0.3052 | 0.0395 | 0.1031 | 0.2105 | 0.6683 | 0.3799 | 0.1162 |
Solution consistency | 0.8419 | 0.8210 | 0.8667 | 0.8163 | 0.8540 | 0.8386 | |||||
Solution coverage | 0.5290 | 0.6394 | 0.8052 | 0.7895 | 0.6683 | 0.7955 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Yang, S.; Wu, J. The Sustainability of the Fishery Industry and Environmental Development: A Study on Factor Market Distortions. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 3017. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043017
Yang S, Wu J. The Sustainability of the Fishery Industry and Environmental Development: A Study on Factor Market Distortions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023; 20(4):3017. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043017
Chicago/Turabian StyleYang, Sha, and Jia Wu. 2023. "The Sustainability of the Fishery Industry and Environmental Development: A Study on Factor Market Distortions" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20, no. 4: 3017. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043017
APA StyleYang, S., & Wu, J. (2023). The Sustainability of the Fishery Industry and Environmental Development: A Study on Factor Market Distortions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(4), 3017. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043017