You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
  • Article
  • Open Access

31 January 2023

The Legal Guarantee for Achieving Carbon Peak and Neutrality Goals in China

and
1
School of Law, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China
2
School of Law, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Special Issue Ecosystem Quality and Stability

Abstract

In order to actively fulfill its international treaty obligations, China has established the goal of peaking CO2 emissions by 2030 and achieving carbon neutrality by 2060. Since 2018, when ecological civilization was written into the Constitution, the realization of carbon peak and neutrality goals has had an ideological foundation and a constitutional basis. China has formulated various special laws and built a 1 + N policy system to reduce carbon emissions, which together with the environmental protection law, climate change law, energy law and other related laws and regulations constitute a unified legal system and provide legal support to achieve carbon peak and neutrality goals. At the same time, China has taken advantage of the new national system with concentrated efforts and resources to delineate the different roles of the government and market mechanisms in carbon emission reduction, and to make the operation of the legal system of carbon peak and neutrality suitable for its actual situation by giving full paly to the initiative of both central and local governments. This article analyzes the current legal system and its characteristics in China in the process of achieving carbon peak and neutrality goals in the context of the new era, and outlooks on the improvement path of the legal system from both domestic and international dimensions. The practice, experience and development direction of China in the construction of the legal guarantee for carbon peak and neutrality goals can provide reference for other countries to achieve carbon reduction.

1. Introduction

In October 2018, the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change released a special report: Global Warming of 1.5 °C. The report states, in conjunction with Article 2 of the Paris Agreement, that global net artificial CO2 emissions will reach net zero around 2050 in the 1.5 °C model. In contrast, in the 2 °C model, net zero will be reached around 2050 []. Net-zero emissions refer to carbon neutrality, meaning that global CO2 emissions will be balanced over a certain period of time through the elimination of artificial CO2 emissions. In terms of global progress towards the carbon neutrality goal, as of September 2022, 17 countries have enacted relevant laws, 38 countries have enacted relevant policies, 16 countries have made relevant commitments and 57 countries are still in the process of discussion [].
As an important promoter for the international governance of climate change, China has made important contributions to the process of promoting the construction of international conventions and treaties frameworks. China ratified the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in 1992 and signed the Kyoto Protocol in 1998. Since the Copenhagen Climate Change Conference in 2009, China has become more proactive in integrating into the international climate change governance framework. In 2012, China and other developing countries facilitated the adoption of the Doha Amendment to the Kyoto Protocol. From 2014 to 2015, China issued joint statements with the United States, France and the United Kingdom, playing an important role in the conclusion and implementation of the Paris Agreement. The above-mentioned international treaties established a platform for action by all countries on the issue of controlling carbon emissions. On 22 September 2020, President Xi Jinping announced at the 75th session of the United Nations General Assembly that China strives to peak CO2 emissions by 2030 and achieve carbon neutrality by 2060.
The proposed long-term climate goal of achieving net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2060 has sparked widespread debate at home and abroad. The vigorous promotion of achieving carbon neutrality is not only a major strategic decision to respond to global climate change and promote the construction of a global environmental governance system, but also a key initiative to promote the construction of ecological civilization and build a community with a shared future for mankind. To achieve the ambitious goal of carbon neutrality, China has begun to structure a technological inspiration system in coordinating and facilitating scientific and technological research and innovations. First and foremost, China should move away from fossil fuel dependence, increase the share of clean energy and reduce total greenhouse gas emissions, which is foreseeable with extensive application of coal-based clean fuel and chemical technology, new energy generation technology (e.g., hydrogen energy, nuclear energy and solar energy), renewable energy non-electric utilization technology, etc. In addition, CCUS (carbon capture, utilization and storage) measures, such as carbon-negative technology, carbon sink monitoring technology, ecosystem carbon fixation technology and non-carbon dioxide greenhouse gas replacement technology, should also be stepped up to offset the total amount of greenhouse gases already emitted [].
There is general agreement that in order to promote the orderly realization of the goal of carbon neutrality, the legal system should be strengthened and guaranteed through the rule of law, and scholars at home and abroad have carried out corresponding research. Some scholars discuss the international conventions and declarations signed by China and the implementation in the context of greenhouse gas emission trends []. Others investigate the construction and operational effectiveness of the legal system in the process of carbon peak and neutrality goals from the two major objectives of promoting carbon emission reduction and achieving sustainable economic and social development [], and focus on the construction and operational effectiveness of the legal system of the carbon-trading market in China []. It is worth noting that, at this stage, the current legal system for achieving carbon peak and neutrality goals has taken on new characteristics of the times and development needs. During the 14th Five-Year Plan period (2021–2025), China is pressing ahead with the implementation of a series of relevant regulations and policies to promote carbon peak by 2030 and to provide the preconditions and guarantees for achieving carbon neutrality by 2060.
This article analyzes the current legal system and its characteristics in the process of achieving carbon peak and neutrality goals in the context of the new era, as well as outlooks on the improvement path of this legal system from both domestic and international dimensions. It argues that China must effectively fulfill its international treaty obligations and responsibilities based on its economic, political, social and cultural development, and comprehensively promote the construction and improvement of the legal system to achieve carbon peak and neutrality. At the same time, efforts should be made to build a new type of national system to combine the role of the government and the market mechanism, so as to mobilize the enthusiasm of local governments under the unified leadership of the central government and provide a solid legal guarantee for the orderly realization of carbon peak and neutrality goals.

5. Conclusions

China is the largest developing country in the world, which means achieving carbon peak and neutrality goals is both a challenge and an opportunity. On the one hand, China must meet the survival and development needs of its 1.4 billion people, and the complete abandonment of high-energy-consuming and high-emission industries in a short period of time will affect the employment of workers and social stability []. On the other hand, the elimination of high-energy-consuming and high-emission industries is an inevitable direction for China to optimize its industrial structure and achieve high-quality social development.
In order to achieve the goal of carbon peak and carbon neutrality, China initially established a unified legal system by formulating special laws and establishing the “1 + N” policy system in accordance with international treaty obligations and domestic needs. However, according to the realization process of carbon peak and carbon neutralization, establishment of the legal system is still in the initial stage and it is necessary to continuously improve the legalization of carbon emission management from both domestic and foreign levels. At the domestic level, China should continue to give full play to the advantages of the “the new national system with concentrated efforts and resources “, and on the premise of a unified legislation system of the central, local governments should be encouraged to explore the legal path to manage the reduction in and neutralization of local carbon emission based on regional economic and social development status. At the international level, to adhere to the spirit of a community with shared future for mankind, China should deeply participate international frameworks, such as South–South cooperation, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization and the Belt and Road Initiative, with an effort to explore the potential development path of more equitable global carbon emission reduction standards and models, and take an initiative in the global climate governance to address ongoing global climate change.
China’s determination to reduce carbon emissions is reflected in the act of pushing toward its carbon peak and neutrality goals through a complex legal system. Its practice and experience in the construction of the legal system for carbon peak and neutrality goals can also serve as a reference for other countries to achieve their carbon emission reduction targets.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.S. and X.H.; methodology, X.H.; writing— original draft preparation, X.H. and H.S.; writing—review and editing, X.H and H.S.; supervision, X.H.; funding acquisition, X.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Taishan Scholars Project Special Funds.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Global Warming of 1.5 °C. 2018, pp. 95–97. Available online: https://library.wmo.int/doc_num.php?explnum_id=10047 (accessed on 28 December 2022).
  2. Energy & Climate Intelligence Unit. Net Zero Tracker. Available online: https://eciu.net/netzerotracker (accessed on 7 January 2023).
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology & Others. Implementation Plan of Technology Support for Carbon Peak and Carbon Neutralization (2022–2030). 2022; pp. 2–7. Available online: https://www.most.gov.cn/xxgk/xinxifenlei/fdzdgknr/qtwj/qtwj2022/202208/t20220817_181986.html (accessed on 20 January 2023).
  4. Li, J.; Chai, Q.; Ma, C.; Wang, J.; Zhou, Z.; Wang, T. China’s climate policy and carbon market outlook in the post-Paris era. China Int. Stud. 2016, 2, 114–132. [Google Scholar]
  5. Wang, J. On the legal framework of carbon peak and neutrality actions. East. Law J. 2021, 5, 122–134. [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhou, K.; Li, Y. Carbon finance and carbon market in China: Progress and challenges. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 214, 536–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Qin, T. The legal guarantee for achieving carbon peak and neutrality goals under the holistic system view. Leg. Sci. (J. Northwestern Univ. Political Sci. Law) 2022, 2, 108–109. [Google Scholar]
  8. Song, Y.; He, W.; Li, S. A study on the legislative development and practical operation of carbon emission trading in China. Environ. Sustain. Dev. 2021, 3, 19. [Google Scholar]
  9. Prella, C.; Feng, K. The evolution of global trade and impacts on countries’ carbon trade imbalances. Soc. Netw. 2016, 46, 87–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. The Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the State Council: Opinions on the Complete and Accurate Implementation of the New Development Concept to Achieve Carbon Peak and Neutrality Goals. Available online: http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2021-10/24/content_5644613.htm (accessed on 28 December 2022).
  11. State Council: The Action Plan for Carbon Peak by 2030. Available online: http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2021-10/26/content_5644984.htm (accessed on 28 December 2022).
  12. Arroyo-Currás, T.; Bauer, N.; Kriegler, E.; Schwanitz, V.J.; Luderer, G.; Aboumahboub, T.; Giannousakis, A.; Hilaire, J. Carbon leakage in a fragmented climate regime: The dynamic response of global energy markets. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2015, 90, 192–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lv, Z. The legal theory of ecological civilization in Xi Jinping’s rule of law thought. Chin. Jurisprud. 2021, 1, 59. [Google Scholar]
  14. Baptista, A.; Amarnath, K. Garbage, power, and environmental justice: The clean power plan rule. William Mary Environ. Law Policy Rev. 2017, 41, 403–434. [Google Scholar]
  15. Black, C.M. Taxation of cross-border transfers of carbon emission allowances under linked emissions trading schemes. Transnatl. Environ. Law 2017, 6, 335–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Galinato, G.I.; Yoder, J.K. An integrated tax-subsidy policy for carbon emission reduction. Resour. Energy Econ. 2010, 32, 310–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, A.L. The search for sustainable legitimacy: Environmental law and bureaucracy in China. Harv. Environ. Law Rev. 2013, 37, 365–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Simonetti, S. Legal protection and (the lack of) private party remedies in international carbon emission reduction projects. J. Energy Nat. Resour. Law 2010, 28, 171–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Vermillion, S. Lessons from China’s carbon markets for U.S. climate change policy. William Mary Environ. Law Policy Rev. 2015, 39, 457–482. [Google Scholar]
  20. Liu, Z. On the rule of law of China’s carbon emission management in the context of carbon peak and neutrality goals. Leg. Sci. 2022, 3, 97. [Google Scholar]
  21. Mao, Z. On the Ten Relations, Selected Writings of Mao Zedong (Latter Volume); People’s Publishing House: Liaoyuan, China, 1986; p. 731. [Google Scholar]
  22. Duan, M. From carbon emissions trading pilots to national system: The road map for China. Carbon Clim. Law Rev. 2015, 3, 231–242. [Google Scholar]
  23. Dernbach, J.C. Creating legal pathways to zero-carbon future. Environ. Law Report. News Anal. 2016, 46, 10780–10790. [Google Scholar]
  24. Cao, M. Legal problems facing carbon emissions trading in China and legislative proposals. Leg. Bus. Stud. 2021, 5, 38–39. [Google Scholar]
  25. Wiseman, H.J.; Osofsky, H.M. Regional energy governance and U.S. carbon emissions. Ecol. Law Q. 2016, 43, 143–236. [Google Scholar]
  26. Slater, H.; De Boer, D.; Qian, G.; Shu, W. 2019 China Carbon Pricing Survey; China Carbon Forum: Beijing, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  27. Klass, A.B.; Wilson, E.J. Climate change and carbon sequestration: Assessing liability regime for long-term storage of carbon dioxide. Emory Law J. 2008, 58, 103–180. [Google Scholar]
  28. Ormiston, J.A. The clean power plan autopsy: Lessons the affordable clean energy rule can learn from its deceased predecessor. Tex. Law Rev. 2020, 98, 791–812. [Google Scholar]
  29. Hotak, S.; Islam, M.; Kakinaka, M.; Kotani, K. Carbon emissions and carbon trade balances: International evidence from panel ARDL analysis. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 24115–24128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hamdi-Cherif, M.; Waisman, H. Global carbon pricing and the “common but differentiated responsibilities”: The case of China. Int. Environ. Agreem. Politics Law Econ. 2016, 16, 671–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.