Next Article in Journal
Linking Perceived Environmental CSR to Residents’ Environmental Citizenship Behavior in Rural Tourism: The Mediating Role of Resident–Environment Relationship Quality
Next Article in Special Issue
Relationship, Discourse and Construction: The Power Process and Environmental Impact of the Honghe Hani Rice Terraces as a World Heritage Site
Previous Article in Journal
Factors Influencing Consumer Behavior toward Green Products: A Systematic Literature Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Statistical Measurements and Club Effects of High-Quality Development in Chinese Manufacturing
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Evaluation and Analysis of Design Elements for Sustainable Renewal of Urban Vulnerable Spaces

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(24), 16562; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416562
by Changzheng Gao 1,2, Juepin Hou 2,*, Yanchen Ma 2 and Jianxin Yang 1
Reviewer 1:
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(24), 16562; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416562
Submission received: 26 October 2022 / Revised: 1 December 2022 / Accepted: 7 December 2022 / Published: 9 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urban Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

(1) The title of the paper needs to be revised, it is to general, not only "Study on..".

(2) The language should be polished by native speakers or experienced companies.

(3) Abstract: line14-line 22. This part is more like method or research steps, not resluts. What are the results of the evaluation?

(4) Introduction: line 39-76. It is not proper to just list the previous studies without your own induction and partition. The comparation of evaluation methods are also not mentioned. The authors should  fully discuss the previous studies according to your research area. 

(5) The authors selected 6 cases of design for the renewal of vulnerable spaces in Zhengzhou City. However, in the results and discussion part, these cases are not mentioned. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The article needs a major review. See the comments in the attached archive.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The article now is ready to be published.

Back to TopTop