Next Article in Journal
Musculoskeletal Diseases Role in the Frailty Syndrome: A Case–Control Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Do Health Information Sources Influence Health Literacy among Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study in the Urban Areas of Western China
Previous Article in Journal
Participation and Inclusion of Children and Youth with Disabilities in Local Communities
Previous Article in Special Issue
eHealth Literacy of Australian Undergraduate Health Profession Students: A Descriptive Study
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Public Libraries as Supportive Environments for Children’s Development of Critical Health Literacy

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(19), 11896; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191911896
by Catherine L. Jenkins *, Susie Sykes and Jane Wills
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(19), 11896; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191911896
Submission received: 30 August 2022 / Revised: 11 September 2022 / Accepted: 19 September 2022 / Published: 20 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Health Literacy and Social Contexts)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Please see comments on the attached word doc.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript presents an interesting and relevant topic for the health, educational and social fields.

However, it would be recommendable to strengthen the theoretical framework with the administrative policy that regulates the provision of bibliographic resources to libraries. It would also be useful to know what health-related publications are available in the libraries under study. This data would make it possible to evaluate the potential of these institutions for health education.

It would also be interesting to know the instrument used in its entirety, in order to see in greater detail what type of questions have been asked and to better evaluate the results.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Although suggestions for improvement have been only partially addressed, the manuscript is sufficiently grounded at the theoretical and methodological aspects.

Back to TopTop