Next Article in Journal
Research Capacity Training on Environmental Health and Noncommunicable Diseases in the Country of Georgia: Challenges and Lessons Learned during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Next Article in Special Issue
From Self-Doubt to Pride: Understanding the Empowering Effects of Delivering School-Based Wellness Programmes for Emerging Adult Facilitators—A Qualitative Study
Previous Article in Journal
Attachment-Based Compassion Therapy for Reducing Anxiety and Depression in Fibromyalgia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Examining the Survey Setting Effect on Current E-Cigarette Use Estimates among High School Students in the 2021 National Youth Tobacco Survey
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Efficacy of a Psycho-Educational and Socio-Emotional Intervention Programme for Adolescents

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(13), 8153; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19138153
by Susana Sánchez-Herrera 1, Eloísa Guerrero-Barona 1, Diana Sosa-Baltasar 2, Juan Manuel Moreno-Manso 1 and Miguel Ángel Durán-Vinagre 1,*
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(13), 8153; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19138153
Submission received: 30 May 2022 / Revised: 30 June 2022 / Accepted: 1 July 2022 / Published: 2 July 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

  Comments and suggestions for authors are attached below

 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Thank you very much for giving me the opportunity to review this paper. I find it impeccable from a methodological point of view. Easy to read, great bibliographical support and meets all the requirements to be published. My sincere congratulations to the authors.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Dear authors:

The manuscript is of interest/relevant.
However, I think the authors need to improve it.
My suggestions/recommendations:
- on page 3 (line 139): correct "objectives" to "objective";
- strengthen the "introduction" with more current references ( in the period 2019- 2021 only 5 references are presented);
-need to improve table 1; I suggest: split the table in two (separate 1ST & 2ND from 3RD & 4TH); introduce lines separating each session; introduce a column referring to the strategy followed.
- in relation to sub-section 2.3, there is a notorious lack of characterization of the intervention. For example: they need to describe the strategy followed (and why this strategy...) in the sessions; they need to describe the duration of each session.

Rev

 

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop