Next Article in Journal
The Impact of Hempseed Consumption on Bone Parameters and Body Composition in Growing Female C57BL/6 Mice
Previous Article in Journal
Comparison of Missing School Meals among Public Schools: How Did New York State Do during COVID-19?
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

MRI and Adenomyosis: What Can Radiologists Evaluate?

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(10), 5840; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19105840
by Veronica Celli 1,†, Miriam Dolciami 1,†, Roberta Ninkova 1, Giada Ercolani 1, Stefania Rizzo 2, Maria Grazia Porpora 3, Carlo Catalano 1 and Lucia Manganaro 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(10), 5840; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19105840
Submission received: 9 April 2022 / Revised: 27 April 2022 / Accepted: 5 May 2022 / Published: 11 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Women's Health)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Although the revision has improved the manuscript I still miss the relevance of sonography (especially 3D), comparison with MRI and strengths and limitations of both methods.

Author Response

Thank you for your appreciated revisions and corrections.

We made some changes from the previous paper and we added a new paragraph from line 93 to line104 as it is marked up using the Track Changes function on Word.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript has been much improved and is in a nice condition.

Author Response

Thank you for your comments, we appreciated your gentle response.

This manuscript is a resubmission of an earlier submission. The following is a list of the peer review reports and author responses from that submission.


Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This is a nicely written review concerning MRI-diagnosis of adenomyosis.

The literature search and interpretation seem to be adequate.

The authors should discuss more in detail pros and cons of US versus MRI and especially the consequences of a detected adenomyosis as to my knowledge there is little data about potential therapies which question the use of expensive diagnostic methods.

Author Response

Thank you. Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This paper is a review of MRI classification and pitfalls in adenomyosis. Basically, the first half of this paper is similar to that of BAZOT 2018 and lacks originality.

Author Response

Thank you. Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

I read with great interest the review 'MRI and Adenomyosis: classification, typical features and differential diagnosis. The paper is well written and represents a complete  review of the adenomyosis. The pathogenetic aspect of the pathology, the classification and the diagnostic possibilities by means of magnetic resonance imaging are summarized. 

The topic is interesting as adenomyosis has a recognized role on fertility and bleeding disorders. Unfortunately it is often underdiagnosed. MRI plays an important role in diagnosis. Unfortunately, to date, we do not have diagnostic tools that can be easily applied in the follow-up of patients. 

Author Response

Thank you. Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop