Problem Gambling ‘Fuelled on the Fly’
Abstract
:1. Decision-Making under Risk
2. Problem Gamblers’ Risk Preferences
3. Triggers of Gambling Behaviour: The Role of Personality, Hormonal and Emotional Activations
3.1. The Role of Personality
3.2. The Role of Hormonal Activations
3.3. The Role of Emotional Activations
4. The Experience of Gambling Behaviour: Dynamic Experience of Events in Time Series
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Von Neumann, J.; Morgenstern, O. Theory of Games and Economic Behaviour, 2nd ed.; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 1947. [Google Scholar]
- Savage, L. The Foundations of Statistics; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1954. [Google Scholar]
- Allais, M. Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: Critique des postulats et axiomes de l’école américaine. Econometrica 1953, 21, 503–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Edwards, W. The prediction of decisions among bets. J. Exp. Psychol. 1955, 50, 201–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ellsberg, D. Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. Q. J. Econ. 1961, 75, 643–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hsee, C.K. The evaluability hypothesis: An explanation for preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of alternatives. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1996, 67, 247–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lichtenstein, S.; Slovic, P. Reversals of preferences between bids and choices in gambling decisions. J. Exp. Psychol. 1971, 89, 46–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lichtenstein, S.; Slovic, P. Response-induced reversals of preference in gambling: An extended replication in las vegas. J. Exp. Psychol. 1973, 101, 16–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Slovic, P.; Lichtenstein, S. Relative importance of probabilities and payoffs in risk taking. J. Exp. Psychol. 1968, 78, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tversky, A. Intransitivity of preferences. Psychol. Rev. 1969, 76, 31–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tversky, A.; Kahneman, D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 1981, 211, 453–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Kahneman, D.; Tversky, A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 1979, 47, 263–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tversky, A.; Kaneman, D. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representations of uncertainty. J. Risk. Uncertain. 1992, 5, 297–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kusev, P.; van Schaik, P.; Martin, R.; Hall, L.; Johansson, P. Preference reversals during risk elicitation. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 2020, 149, 585–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gal, D.; Rucker, D.D. The loss of loss aversion: Will it loom larger than its gain? J. Consum. Psychol. 2018, 28, 497–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kahneman, D.; Knetsch, J.L.; Thaler, R.H. Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the coase theorem. J. Political Econ. 1990, 98, 1325–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Thaler, R. Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 1980, 1, 39–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kahneman, D.; Knetsch, J.L.; Thaler, R.H. Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. J. Econ. Perspect. 1991, 5, 193–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Samuelson, W.; Zeckhauser, R. Status quo bias in decision making. J. Risk Uncertain. 1988, 1, 7–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gal, D. A psychological law of inertia and the illusion of loss aversion. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 2006, 1, 23–32. [Google Scholar]
- Ert, E.; Erev, I. On the descriptive value of loss aversion in decisions under risk: Six clarifications. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 2013, 8, 214–235. [Google Scholar]
- Walasek, L.; Stewart, N. How to make loss aversion disappear and reverse: Tests of the decision by sampling origin of loss aversion. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 2015, 144, 7–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Walasek, L.; Stewart, N. Context-dependent sensitivity to losses: Range and skew manipulations. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 2019, 45, 957–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kusev, P.; van Schaik, P.; Ayton, P.; Dent, J.; Chater, N. Exaggerated risk: Prospect theory and probability weighting in risky choice. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 2009, 35, 1487–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kusev, P.; van Schaik, P.; Aldrovandi, S. Preferences induced by accessibility: Evidence from priming. J. Neurosci. Psychol. Econ. 2012, 5, 250–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Slovic, P. The construction of preference. Am. Psychol. 1995, 50, 364–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brandstätter, E.; Gigerenzer, G.; Hertwig, R. The priority heuristic: Making choices without trade-offs. Psychol. Rev. 2006, 113, 409–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Gigerenzer, G.; Todd, P.M. The ABC Research Group. Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart, 1st ed.; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Kusev, P.; van Schaik, P. Preferences under risk: Content-dependent behavior and psychological processing. Front. Psychol. 2011, 2, 269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Martin, R.; Kusev, P.; van Schaik, P. Autonomous vehicles: How perspective-taking accessibility alters moral judgments and consumer purchasing behavior. Cognition 2021, 212, 104666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martin, R.; Kusev, P.; Teal, J.; Baranova, V.; Rigal, B. Moral decision making: From bentham to veil of ignorance via perspective taking accessibility. Behav. Sci. 2021, 11, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Payne, J.W.; Bettman, J.R.; Coupey, E.; Johnson, E.J. A constructive process view of decision making: Multiple strategies in judgment and choice. Acta Psychol. 1992, 80, 107–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stewart, N.; Chater, N.; Brown, G.D.A. Decision by sampling. Cogn. Psychol. 2006, 53, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tversky, A.; Kahneman, D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 1974, 185, 1124–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hertwig, R.; Barron, G.; Weber, E.U.; Erev, I. Decisions from experience and the effect of rare events in risky choice. Psychol. Sci. 2004, 15, 534–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pedroni, A.; Frey, R.; Bruhin, A.; Dutlih, G.; Hertwig, R.; Rieskamp, J. The risk elicitation puzzle. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2017, 1, 803–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Limbrick-Oldfield, E.H.; Cherkasova, M.V.; Kennedy, D.; Goshko, C.; Barton, J.J.S.; Clark, L. Gambling disorder is associated with reduced sensitivity to expected value during risky choice. J. Behav. Addict. 2021, 9, 1044–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Currie, S.R.; Hodgins, D.C.; Williams, R.J.; Fiest, K. Predicting future harm from gambling over a five-year period in a general population sample: A survival analysis. BMC Psychiatry 2021, 21, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ring, P.; Probst, C.C.; Neyse, L.; Wolff, S.; Kaernback, C.; van Eimeren, T.; Camerer, C.F.; Schmidt, U. It’s all about gains: Risk preferences in problem gambling. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 2018, 147, 1241–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Genauck, A.; Quester, S.; Wüstenberg, T.; Mörsen, C.; Heinz, A.; Romanczuk-Seiferth, N. Reduced loss aversion in pathological gambling and alcohol dependence is associated with differential alterations in amygdala and prefrontal functioning. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 16306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Takeuchi, H.; Kawade, R.; Tsurumi, K.; Yokoyama, N.; Takemura, A.; Murao, T.; Murai, T.; Takahashi, H. Heterogeneity of loss aversion in pathological gambling. J. Gambl. Stud. 2016, 32, 1143–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Brevers, D.; Cleeremans, A.; Goudriaan, A.E.; Bechara, A.; Kornreich, C.; Verbanck, P.; Noël, X. Decision making under ambiguity but not under risk is related to problem gambling severity. Psychiatry Res. 2012, 200, 568–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gelskov, S.V.; Madsen, K.H.; Ramsøy, T.Z.; Siebner, H.R. berrant neural signatures of decision-making: Pathological gamblers display cortico-striatal hypersensitivity to extreme gambles. Neuroimage 2016, 128, 342–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Giorgetta, C.; Grecucci, A.; Rattin, A.; Guerreschi, C.; Sanfey, A.G.; Bonini, N. To play or not to play: A personal dilemma in pathological gambling. Psychiatry Res. 2014, 219, 562–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ligneul, R.; Sescousse, G.; Barbalat, G.; Domenech, P.; Dreher, J. Shifted risk preferences in pathological gambling. Psychol. Med. 2013, 43, 1059–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Powell, J.; Hardoon, K.; Derevensky, J.L.; Gupta, R. Gambling and risk-taking behavior among university students. Subst. Use Misuse 1999, 34, 1167–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hill, T.; Kusev, P.; van Schaik, P. Choice under risk: How occupation influences preferences. Front. Psychol. 2019, 10, 2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Petry, N.M. A comparison of treatment-seeking pathological gamblers based on preferred gambling activity. Addiction 2003, 98, 645–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wagenaar, W.A. Paradoxes of Gambling Behaviour; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
- Walker, M.B. The Psychology of Gambling; Pergamon Press: New York, NY, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
- Schüll, N.D. Addiction by Design: Machine Gambling in Las Vegas; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Newall, P.W.S.; Cassidy, R.; Walasek, L.; Ludvig, E.A.; Meyer, C. Who uses custom sports betting products? Addict Res. Theory 2021, 29, 148–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Newall, P.W.S.; Walasek, L.; Vázquez Kiesel, R.; Ludvig, E.A.; Meyer, C. Request-a-bet sports betting products indicate patterns of bettor preference and bookmaker profits. J. Behav. Addict. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kusev, P.; Purser, H.; Heilman, R.; Cooke, A.J.; van Schaik, P.; Baranova, V.; Martin, R.; Ayton, P. Understanding risky behavior: The influence of cognitive, emotional and hormonal factors on decision-making under risk. Front. Psychol. 2017, 8, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Goldberg, L.R. An alternative "description of personality": The big-five factor structure. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1990, 59, 1216–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McCrae, R.R.; Costa, P.T. Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1987, 52, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goldberg, L.R. The structure of phenotypic personality traits. Am. Psychol. 1993, 48, 26–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roccas, S.; Sagiv, L.; Schwartz, S.H.; Knafo, A. The big five personality factors and personal values. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 2002, 28, 789–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buelow, M.T.; Cayton, C. Relationships between the big five personality characteristics and performance on behavioral decision making tasks. Pers. Individ. Differ. 2020, 160, 109931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pinjisakikool, T. The influence of personality traits on households’ financial risk tolerance and financial behaviour. J. Interdiscip. Econ. 2018, 30, 32–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tok, S. The big five personality traits and risky sport participation. Soc. Behav. Personal. Int. J. 2011, 39, 1105–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clarke, S.; Robertson, I.T. A meta-analytic review of the big five personality factors and accident involvement in occupational and non-occupational settings. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 2005, 78, 355–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abe, S.; Oshino, A.; Kawamoto, T.; Ito, H.; Hirashima, T.; Tsubota, Y.; Tani, I. Smokers are extraverted in japan: Smoking habit and the big five personality traits. SAGE Open 2019, 9, 215824401985995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brown, S.; Taylor, K. Household finances and the ‘Big five’ personality traits. J. Econ. Psychol. 2014, 45, 197–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bagby, R.M.; Vachon, D.D.; Bulmash, E.L.; Toneatto, T.; Quilty, L.C.; Costa, P.T. Pathological gambling and the five-factor model of personality. Pers. Individ. Differ. 2007, 43, 873–880. [Google Scholar]
- Brunborg, G.S.; Hanss, D.; Mentzoni, R.A.; Molde, H.; Pallesen, S. Problem gambling and the five-factor model of personality: A large population-based study. Addiction 2016, 111, 1428–1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Caspi, A.; Roberts, B.W.; Shiner, R.L. Personality development: Stability and change. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2005, 56, 453–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Rantanen, J.; Metäpelto, R.; Feldt, T.; Pulkkinen, L.; Kokko, K. Long-term stability in the big five personality traits in adulthood. Scand. J. Psychol. 2007, 48, 511–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wortman, J.; Lucas, R.E.; Brent Donnellan, M. Stability and change in the big five personality domains: Evidence from a longitudinal study of australians. Psychol. Aging 2012, 27, 867–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ferguson, C.J. A meta-analysis of normal and disordered personality across the life span. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2010, 98, 659–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McCrae, R.R.; Costa, P.T. The stability of personality: Observations and evaluations. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 1994, 3, 173–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roberts, B.W.; DelVecchio, W.F. The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychol. Bull. 2000, 126, 3–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McCrae, R.R.; Costa, P.T.; Pedroso de Lima, M.; Simões, A.; Ostendorf, F.; Angleitner, A.; Marušić, I.; Bratko, D.; Vittorio Caparara, G.; Barbaranelli, C.; et al. Age differences in personality across the adult life span: Parallels in five cultures. Dev. Psychol. 1999, 35, 466–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bandura, A. Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2001, 52, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Coates, J.M.; Herbert, J. Endogenous steroids and financial risk taking on a london trading floor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 6167–6172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Putman, P.; Antypa, N.; Crysovergi, P.; van der Does, W.A.J. Exogenous cortisol acutely influences motivated decision making in healthy young men. Psychopharmacology 2010, 208, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Korte, S.M. Corticosteroids in relation to fear, anxiety and psychopathology. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2001, 25, 117–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kandasamy, N.; Hardy, B.; Page, L.; Schaffner, M.; Graggaber, J.; Powlson, A.J.; Fletcher, P.C.; Gurnell, M.; Coates, J. Cortisol shifts financial risk preferences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 3608–3613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Paris, J.J.; Franco, C.; Sodano, R.; Frye, C.A.; Wulfert, E. Gambling pathology is associated with dampened cortisol response among men and women. Physiol. Behav. 2009, 99, 230–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Buchanan, T.W.; McMullin, S.D.; Mulhauser, K.; Weinstock, J.; Weller, J.A. Diurnal cortisol and decision making under risk in problem gambling. Psychol. Addict. Behav. 2020, 34, 218–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Stanton, S.J.; Liening, S.H.; Schultheiss, O.C. Testosterone is positively associated with risk taking in the iowa gambling task. Horm. Behav. 2011, 59, 252–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Byrnes, J.P.; Miller, D.C.; Schafer, W.D. Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 1999, 125, 367–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Croson, R.; Gneezy, U. Gender differences in preferences. J. Econ. Lit. 2009, 47, 448–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Castrén, S.; Basnet, S.; Pankakoski, M.; Ronkainen, J.; Helakorpi, S.; Uutela, A.; Alho, H.; Lahti, T. An analysis of problem gambling among the finnish working-age population: A population survey. BMC Public Health 2013, 13, 519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Chou, K.L.; Afifi, T.O. Disordered (pathologic or problem) gambling and axis I psychiatric disorders: Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2011, 173, 1289–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Welte, J.W.; Barnes, G.M.; Tidwell, M.O.; Hoffman, J.H.; Wieczorek, W.F. Gambling and problem gambling in the united states: Changes between 1999 and 2013. J. Gambl. Stud. 2015, 31, 695–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stenstrom, E.; Saad, G. Testosterone, financial risk-taking, and pathological gambling. J. Neurosci. Psychol. Econ. 2011, 4, 254–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blanco, C.; Ibáñez, A.; Blanco-Jerez, C.; Baca-Garcia, E.; Sáiz-Ruiz, J. Plasma testosterone and pathological gambling. Psychiatry Res. 2001, 105, 117–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loewenstein, G.; Lerner, J.S. The role of affect in decision-making. In Handbook of Affective Sciences, 1st ed.; Davidson, R.J., Scherer, K.R., Goldsmith, H.H., Eds.; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2003; pp. 619–642. [Google Scholar]
- Loomes, G.; Sugden, R. Regret theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. Econ. J. 1982, 92, 805–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loomes, G.; Sugden, R. Disappointment and dynamic consistency in choice under uncertainty. Rev. Econ. Stud. 1986, 53, 271–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loewenstein, G. Emotions in economic theory and economic behavior. Am. Econ. Rev. 2000, 90, 426–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Szask, P.L.; Hofmann, S.G.; Heilman, R.M.; Curtiss, J. Effect of regulating anger and sadness on decision-making. Cogn. Behav. Ther. 2016, 45, 479–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heilman, R.M.; Crişan, L.G.; Houser, D.; Miclea, M.; Miu, A.C. Emotion regulation and decision making under risk and uncertainty. Emotion 2010, 10, 257–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Miu, A.C.; Heilman, R.M.; Houser, D. Anxiety impairs decision-making: Psychophysiological evidence from an Iowa Gambling Task. Biol. Psychol. 2008, 77, 353–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heilman, R.M.; Miu, A.C.; Houser, D. Emotion regulation and economic decision-making. In Neuroeconomics; Reuter, M., Montag, C., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2016; pp. 113–131. [Google Scholar]
- Schlösser, T.; Dunning, D.; Fetchenhauer, D. What a feeling: The role of immediate and anticipated emotions in risky decisions. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 2013, 26, 13–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grable, J.E.; Roszkowski, M.J. The influence of mood on the willingness to take financial risks. J. Risk Res. 2008, 11, 905–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stanton, S.J.; Reeck, C.; Huettel, S.A.; LaBar, K.S. Effects of induced moods on economic choices. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 2014, 9, 167–175. [Google Scholar]
- Otto, A.R.; Fleming, S.M.; Glimcher, P.W. Unexpected but incidental positive outcomes predict real-world gambling. Psychol. Sci. 2016, 27, 299–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Isen, A.M.; Patrick, R. The effect of positive feelings on risk taking: When the chips are down. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 1983, 31, 194–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnson, E.J.; Tversky, A. Affect, generalization, and the perception of risk. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1983, 45, 20–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuen, K.S.L.; Lee, T.M.C. Could mood state affect risk-taking decisions? J. Affect. Disord. 2003, 75, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mittal, V.; Ross, W.T. The impact of positive and negative affect and issue framing on issue interpretation and risk taking. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1998, 76, 298–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Gambetti, E.; Giusberti, F. The effect of anger and anxiety traits on investment decisions. J. Econ. Psychol. 2012, 33, 1059–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petrova, D.G.; van der Pligt, J.; Garcia-Retamero, R. Feeling the numbers: On the interplay between risk, affect, and numeracy. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 2014, 27, 191–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kobylińska, D.; Kusev, P. Flexible emotion regulation: How situational demands and individual differences influence the effectiveness of regulatory strategies. Front. Psychol. 2019, 10, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cutuli, D. Cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression strategies role in the emotion regulation: An overview on their modulatory effects and neural correlates. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 2014, 8, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Tice, D.M.; Bratslavsky, E.; Baumeister, R.F. Emotional distress regulation takes precedence over impulse control: If you feel bad, do it. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2001, 80, 53–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tang, C.S.; Lim, M.S.M.; Koh, J.M.; Cheung, F.Y.L. motion dysregulation mediating associations among work stress, burnout, and problem gambling: A serial multiple mediation model. J. Gambl. Stud. 2019, 35, 813–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williams, A.D.; Grisham, J.R.; Erskine, A.; Cassedy, E. Deficits in emotion regulation associated with pathological gambling. Br. J. Clin. Psychol. 2012, 51, 223–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomas, A.C.; Sullivan, G.B.; Allen, F.C.L. A theoretical model of EGM problem gambling: More than a cognitive escape. Int. J. Ment. Health Addict. 2009, 7, 97–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wood, R.T.A.; Griffiths, M.D. A qualitative investigation of problem gambling as an escape-based coping strategy. Psychol. Psychother. 2007, 80, 107–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kusev, P.; van Schaik, P.; Tsaneva-Atanasova, K.; Juliusson, A.; Chater, N. Adaptive anchoring model: How static and dynamic presentations of time series influence judgments and predictions. Cogn. Sci. 2018, 42, 77–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hertwig, R.; Erev, I. The description–experience gap in risky choice. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2009, 13, 517–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Teal, J.; Kusev, P.; Heilman, R.; Martin, R.; Passanisi, A.; Pace, U. Problem Gambling ‘Fuelled on the Fly’. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 8607. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168607
Teal J, Kusev P, Heilman R, Martin R, Passanisi A, Pace U. Problem Gambling ‘Fuelled on the Fly’. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(16):8607. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168607
Chicago/Turabian StyleTeal, Joseph, Petko Kusev, Renata Heilman, Rose Martin, Alessia Passanisi, and Ugo Pace. 2021. "Problem Gambling ‘Fuelled on the Fly’" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 16: 8607. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168607