Review Reports
- Claudiu-Eduard Nistor1,2,
- Daniel Pantile1,* and
- Camelia Stanciu-Gavan1
- et al.
Reviewer 1: Faisal Basheer Reviewer 2: Anant Jain Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
See the attached file
Comments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
Author Response
Thak you for your review. We have edited the text in accordance with most of your requirements.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
The authors have done a good job of describing diagnostic and treatment analysis of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and non-15 COVID-19 pneumothorax. The manuscript is well written. The study design is appropriate and the conclusion drawn from the results seems correct.
Author Response
Thak you for your review.
Reviewer 3 Report
Insufficient description in Materials and Methods – information about statistical tests, used software are missed, poor information about laboratory analyses.
A Results are below the scientific level. They look like laboratory report.
A Discussion presents mainly descriptions of pneumothorax treatment and interventional methods and is far from the Results.
English language correction is needed (e.g. “significantly higher” instead of “significantly bigger”, grammar mistakes).
Many abbreviations are not explained in the text.
Author Response
Thak you for your review. We have edited the text in accordance with most of your requirements.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
It's good to see that the issues highlighted are addressed accordingly making the manuscript good to read. Please correct the references as per Vancouver style; hyphens in between author names to be replaced by commas with full stop after the last author name.
Rest I am happy to accept for publication
Author Response
Dear reviewer,
We have addressed the references and author names, complying with your indications. Thank you.