Three-port retroperitoneoscopic necrosectomy in management of acute necrotic pancreatitis
Abstract
Material and methods. This article contains a retrospective analysis of cases and description of original retroperitoneoscopic necrosectomy technique. There were eight patients aged 25–58 years, who underwent retroperitoneoscopic pancreatic necrosectomy in the Center of Abdominal Surgery, Vilnius University Hospital Santariškių Klinikos, between 2007 and 2009. All patients had at least 30% pancreatic necrosis with extensive retroperitoneal fl uid collections on the left side, proved by CT scan. Operations were performed on the 21st–56th days of illness (median, 36th day).
Results. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 49 days (range, 14–99 days). All patients survived. Two patients underwent three additional procedures; two patients, one additional procedure due to remaining infected necrosis. Three patients had no requirement for additional procedures. One patient underwent laparotomy because of bleeding.
Conclusions. We assume that minimally invasive techniques should be considered a first-choice surgical option in patients with acute necrotic pancreatitis, whenever it is possible. Pancreatic necrosis less than 30% with large fluid collections in the left retroperitoneal space facilitates employment of three-port retroperitoneoscopic necrosectomy.
Share and Cite
Šileikis, A.; Beiša, V.; Simutis, G.; Tamošiūnas, A.; Strupas, K. Three-port retroperitoneoscopic necrosectomy in management of acute necrotic pancreatitis. Medicina 2010, 46, 176. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina46030024
Šileikis A, Beiša V, Simutis G, Tamošiūnas A, Strupas K. Three-port retroperitoneoscopic necrosectomy in management of acute necrotic pancreatitis. Medicina. 2010; 46(3):176. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina46030024
Chicago/Turabian StyleŠileikis, Audrius, Virgilijus Beiša, Gintaras Simutis, Albinas Tamošiūnas, and Kęstutis Strupas. 2010. "Three-port retroperitoneoscopic necrosectomy in management of acute necrotic pancreatitis" Medicina 46, no. 3: 176. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina46030024