Next Article in Journal
Light Dependent Resistance as a Sensor in Spectroscopy Setups Using Pulsed Light and Compared with Electret Microphones
Next Article in Special Issue
Micro Semiconductor CO Sensors Based on Indium-Doped Tin Dioxide Nanocrystalline Powders
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Enhancement of H2-sensing Properties of F-doped SnO2 Sensorby Surface Modification with SiO2
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

CNT Sensors for Detecting Gases with Low Adsorption Energy by Ionization

Department of Electronic Engineering, Kyungnam University, Masan, Korea 631-701
Sensors 2006, 6(5), 503-513; https://doi.org/10.3390/s6050503
Submission received: 29 March 2006 / Accepted: 4 May 2006 / Published: 5 May 2006
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gas Sensors)

Abstract

:
In case of typical chemical gas sensors reacted by gas adsorption on surface of an active layer, it is difficult to detect some gases which have low chemical adsorption energy like inert gases. In this paper, we report a gas sensor using carbon nanotube(CNT) array as electron emitters for the purpose of detecting these gases. Specifically, sensors were fabricated with applications of glass patterning by a sand-blast process and of anodic bonding between glass and silicon to improve the compactness of the structure and the reliability in process. The proposed sensor, based on an electrical discharge theory known as Paschen's law, worked by figuring the changes of dark discharge current and initial breakdown voltage depending on the concentration and the identity of gases. In this work, air and Ar gases were examined and discussed.

1. Introduction

Chemical gas sensors usually utilize an electrical or optical response by adsorption of gas molecules on surface of an active layer. Among them metal-oxide gas sensors [1-3] are a representative example. The metal-oxide gas sensors consist of SnO2, ZnO or TiO2, as active layer, where the adsorption of gas molecules leads to a large change in its electrical resistivity. They have merits of low cost, good sensitivity, and convenient form of response (a simple change in resistance). But in order to achieve enhanced chemical reactivity between gas molecules and active layer, the sensors need to drive at high temperature of 200-500°C which causes problems of high power consumption and pre-heating time. Otherwise, some gas sensors which enable to operate even at room temperature have ever been developed with no metal-oxide like porous silicon [4-5]. However, all gas-adsorptive types of sensors have still potential difficulties in detecting gases with low adsorption energy or low electronegativity toward the active layer, among other limitations.
By the way, ionization sensors [6-8] which can detect gas molecules, regardless of the magnitude of the gas adsorption energy, have been deployed for a variety of applications such as environmental monitoring, sensing in chemical processing plants, and gas detection for counter-terrorism. They work by fingerprinting ionization characteristics of distinct gases. Generally the hot-cathode type of ionization sensors has been more prevailed due to easy thermionic emission of electrons from a cathode than the cold-cathode type by field emission, but the thermionic emission has some weak points; as pressure is very sensitive to temperature, the heat from filament must be blocked, and as chemical reaction by heated filament leads to additional contribution to the concentration, it must be restricted. Besides, all of the ionization sensors are limited by their huge and bulky architecture, high power consumption and risky high-voltage operation as they can be little fabricated by typical semiconductor process. If standard batch processing, as in the IC industry, is applicable to manufacturing sensors, a lot of identical sensors will be produced in one run, thus substantially improving their performance/cost ratio. Additionally, the miniaturization of sensors will not only contribute to their potentially low cost, but also allow them to be integrated with microelectronic circuits; thus, further enhancing their performance.
Here we propose a sensor differentiated from past ionization sensors [6-8] by its small size and by processes used in its manufacture. Recently, carbon nanotube(CNT)-based sensors which may be classified into chemical and physical types for convenience have been developed for gas detection. Early chemical types of CNT sensors were reported in some journals [9-12]. They usually figured out the data with the changes of conductivity and permittivity in CNTs by gas adsorption, and have shown merits such as good electrical response even at room temperature as well as a small size.
On the other hand, physical types of CNT gas sensors [13-14] were later introduced which utilized ionization of neutral gas by collisions with electrons under highly applied voltage. In general, physical gas sensors should be strong to high-voltage application. CNTs have relatively low electron escaping work and very sharp tip curvatures, and remain structurally stable under high electric fields [15], so the CNTs have been known to be the best field emitters over conventional field emitting metals such as Mo and W. Further, it has been known that vertically aligned CNT array covering a cathode is more compatible to produce a consistent nanometer-scale surface topology than conventional planar electrodes or micro-machined electron emitters. Therefore the CNT array is expected as a good cathode for electron emission, leading to dark discharge current more effectively.
In this paper, we introduced efficient process for fabricating CNT sensors with simplicity and compactness in the structure and reliability in process, inspected I-V properties in the dark discharge region with the sensors, and discussed the results with well-known Paschen's curves.

2. Device Fabrication and Measurement

2.1. Device Fabrication

The proposed sensor consists of three layers; emitter, spacer and anode. For the formation of multi-walled carbon nanotube (CNT) array on a highly doped 4-inch n-type (100) silicon substrate, Ti was first deposited on the Si substrate to improve adhesion and to prevent reaction of the metal catalyst with the substrate, and then Fe deposition was followed with an electron-beam evaporator where the Fe thin film as a catalyst metal was deposited to a thickness in the range of 10nm, and was pre-patterned into the size of 3×3 mm2 with conventional photolithography and a shadow mask to allow selective growth of CNTs. The growth of the vertically aligned CNT array was carried out with thermal CVD equipment. Pretreatment process was done for nucleation of the Fe film into the size of 10 to 30-nm-diameter in NH3 gas at 850, and then the CNT array were grown with C2H2 source gas as a precursor in which C2H2 was supplied in a flow rate of 30 sccm at the temperature of 850°C for 10 min.
After making the CNT emitters, we prepared a spacer layer for insulation between the emitters and the anode. A flat pyrex glass plate with 500μm thickness as spacer layer was engraved for air-opening on the surface by a sand-blast process. The sand-blast process is currently used in manufacturing flat panel displays, silicon chips, and the patterning of various substrates such as glass, carbon and ceramic. It provides precise glass patterning in a resolution of μm range with a conventional photolithography. Using steps similar to those in integrated-circuit fabrication, vents were precisely shaped into V-groove. Finally, the silicon substrates for the CNT emitters and the anode, respectively, were combined into two steps with the patterned pyrex glass by an anodic bonding process at 400°C. The anodic bonding between silicon substrate and pyrex glass is compatible to minimize thermal mismatch. Figure 1 shows an image of patterned pyrex glass combined with Si substrate grown by selective CNT array, where the area of the substrate was about 1.2×1.2cm2.
In this work, fabrication of the sensors was realized with a partial batch process on 4-inch wafers which is possible to the development of a full batch process eventually. The batch process provides merits such as reductions of the sensor size and the manufacturing cost, and the improved stability. Figure 2 shows a structure of the sensor and an anodic bonding procedure, and Figure 3 shows an image of a 4-inch patterned pyrex glass plate.

2.2. Measurement

The fabricated CNT sensor was placed for measurement in a chamber where gas could be pumped out up to the vacuum pressure of 1×10-5Torr. Silver paste contacts were made directly to both silicon plates of the sensors. The voltage was applied through electrical feed-through. All experiments were conducted at room temperature, and discharge current-voltage properties were measured with a high voltage source (Max. 1000V corresponding to 2×106V/m) and with Keithley 2425 SourceMeter as a current meter. In this work, we used air and Ar as target gases for testing the sensor. The gas concentration in the chamber was controlled from 10-7 to 10-4 [mol/liter] by pumping. The sensor was connected in series with a current-limiting resistance to restrict the electrical current. Figure 4 shows a diagram of experimental setup for testing the CNT sensor.

3. Results and Discussion

Even though most gases in a chamber remain predominantly neutral in electricity, they can produce spontaneously a small number of electrons and ions by cosmic rays and natural radioactivity. Once these generated electrons and ions will move if a static voltage is applied; that is, electrons will migrate to an anode, ions to a cathode, and a small current will flow between two electrodes. But this current has no visible effects, and can be detected and measured only with difficulty because of small quantity in electrical charges.
By the electrical discharge theory in ideal gas, the typical discharge I-V curve is shaped as shown in Figure 5. When the applied voltage between an anode and a cathode is given as V= Vo- IR where Vo is the voltage supplied from the power supply, the I-V curve is divided to three parts and the operating point on the curve is determined by a load line according to values of the resistance, R. If operating point A is placed in a dark discharge region as shown in the figure, the current is no more than hundreds microampere, and is not self-sustained. If the applied voltage is increased or the resistance is reduced further, operating point A will move up the curve until the sparking voltage, Vs, is reached. And then the voltage applied to the sensor is sharply reduced, the operating point is transited to a glow discharge region, and the discharge is now self-sustained. If the resistance, R, is changed to a much smaller value in the glow discharge region, cathode heating may be enough to increase the electron supply and lower the discharge voltage, and the operating point will be transited to an arc region. Therefore, the transit of the operating point to other region on the discharge I-V curve is possible by controlling the applied voltage or the resistance.
In this work, the operating point of the sensor is limited only within the dark discharge region by connecting in series with a current-limiting resistance and by restricting the maximum applied voltage to 1kV.
We assume that the medium in the chamber is an ideal gas and that electrons are emitted from the micro tips of the vertically aligned CNT array under high applied voltage. Once electrons are emitted from the CNT array, they are accelerated towards the anode by electrical field, collide with gas molecules, and lead to the ionization of these neural molecules. Therefore, I-V characteristics in the dark discharge region depend both on the amount of electrons and positive ions generated through collisions and on the drift velocity of the electrons. Figure 6 shows the dependence of the dark current on air concentration in the chamber under the applied voltages of 300, 500 and 1000V, where the concentration is defined as the unit of mol/liter and the distance between the electrodes is constant about 500μm. As shown in the figure, the current increased with the applied voltage by the increase of the drift velocity, and it was found that the current increased abruptly over some critical concentrations on the voltages of 500 and 1000V, while any abruption in the current did not occur regardless of the concentration below the low applied voltage like 300V. That is, there existed a minimum voltage to cause a cascading of secondary electrons, since the electron energy gain is proportional to electrical field.
In summary, the dark current increased with the air concentration because more charges could be generated by collision, and the abruptions in current were shifted to the lower concentration as the static voltage increased higher. At 500V the current abruption occurred at 5×10-6 mol/liter, while at 1000V it occurred at 1.5×10-6 mol/liter.
In this work, we explain a detection process of the gas concentration and identity by ionization theoretically with Paschen's law. Paschen's law reflects a dark discharge mechanism, that is, a cascading of secondary electrons emitted by collisions in a gap, where the initial sparking breakdown voltage, Vs, is decided by a function of the product of the gas pressure, p, and the distance between two electrodes, d, and is expressed as
V s = f ( pd ) .
In this experiment, the breakdown voltage depends only on the pressure because the distance between the anode and the cathode is constant.
Paschen's law can be visualized graphically, where the curves show the lowest breakdown voltage to be roughly an order of magnitude larger than the ionization voltage. Starting from low pressure, the breakdown voltage at first decreases with increasing pressure because more molecules can be ionized, but at higher pressure the breakdown voltage increases with pressure because the mean free path decreases and electrons have difficulty reaching ionization energy.
By the way, the conversion from pressure to concentration can be derived by the state equation for ideal gas;
p = nRT ,
where p is the pressure, n the concentration expressed as the number of moles of gas per unit volume, R the ideal gas constant, and T the absolute temperature.
An electron can ionize neutral atoms by collision with the energy required to free the least bound electron from an atom being the ionization energy. If the gas concentration changes, other parameters remaining constant, production of electron-ion pairs will change correspondingly. Figure 7 shows the dependence of the initial breakdown voltage on air concentration in the chamber. For simplification, the initial breakdown voltage was defined as the voltage necessary for 0.1mA current. On the left side of the curve indicating the lower concentration, the initial breakdown voltage was fast increased with the reduction of the concentration because the dark discharge current depends on the amount of neutral molecules in the chamber which can provide electron-ion pairs generated by collisions. However, on the right side of the curve, the initial breakdown voltage was slowly increased with the increase of the concentration. In this region, the ionization rate is predominantly determined by the length of the mean free path rather than the amount of neutral molecules. The electron energy gain between two collisions is proportional to electrical field and is inversely proportional to concentration; thus if the gas concentration is higher, the mean free path will be shorter, and then the kinetic energy of the electron is not enough to ionize the neutral molecules. Therefore, as the ionization rate by collision is reduced with the concentration, the initial breakdown voltage increases with it. For air the minimum breakdown voltage was observed to be around 340V under the condition that the distance between the electrodes was fixed to 500μm.
The ionization rate of neutral molecules depends strongly on the concentration and the ionization energy of neutral molecules. Therefore the breakdown characteristics differ according to gases, and it is possible to detect the identity and the concentration of unknown gas species. Figure 8 shows the dependence of the breakdown voltage on Ar concentration. Over the whole range of the concentration the breakdown voltage in argon was lower than air because of relatively low electronegativity, even though the ionization energy of Ar gas (15.7eV) is somewhat larger than that of nitrogen (15.5eV) or oxygen (12.6eV) gases. In general, high electronegative gases such as SF6, Freon, oxygen, and nitrogen including air can reattach electrons after ionization easily and then turn to be neutral. Consequently, the discharge current in air is relatively reduced by the recombination, and the breakdown voltage in air becomes higher than that of Ar. The minimum breakdown voltage in Ar ambience was observed to be around 230V less than that of air.

4. Conclusion

In this work we reported an efficient fabrication and their performance of gas sensors using CNT array as electron emitters. By using the silicon-glass anodic bonding and glass patterning processes with the typical Si process, we improved the compactness of the structure and the reliability in process. The sensors have merits of small size, low cost, and low power consumption within tens mWs available to battery-power. In the experiment, breakdown characteristics in the dark discharge region were discussed as a function of gas concentration below the applied voltage of 1kV for air and Ar gases. As the result, even though it should be realized that there are many other factors which have an effect on the breakdown of a gap, the sensors led to similar result as predicted by Paschen's law. We expect that they are suitable to sensing vacuum pressure, environmental monitoring, sensing in chemical processing plants, and detecting inert gases.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the academic research fund of Kyungnam University in the year of 2005.

References and Notes

  1. Varghese, O.; Grimes, C. Metal oxide nanoarchitectures for environmental sensing. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2003, 3, 277–293. [Google Scholar]
  2. Shimizu, Y.; Egashira, M. Basic aspects and challenges of semiconductor gas sensors. Mater. Res. Soc. Bull. 1999, 24, 18–24. [Google Scholar]
  3. Lee, M.; Meyer, J. A new process for fabricating CO sensing layers based on BaTiO and additives. Sensors and Actuators B 2000, 68, 293–299. [Google Scholar]
  4. Watanabe, K.; Okada, T.; Choe, I.; Sato, Y. Organic vapor sensitivity in a porous silicon device. Sensors and Actuators B 1996, 33, 194–197. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kim, S. J.; Lee, S. H.; Lee, C. J. Organic vapor sensing by current response of porous silicon layer. J. of Phys. D 2001, 34, 3505–3508. [Google Scholar]
  6. Sedlacek, M. Electron Physics of Vacuum and Gaseous Devices; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1996; pp. 386–400. [Google Scholar]
  7. Abbott, P. J.; Looney, J. P.; Mohan, P. The effect of ambient temperature on the sensitivity of hot-cathode ionization gauges. Vacuum 2005, 77, 217–222. [Google Scholar]
  8. Akimichi, H.; Tanaka, T.; Takeuchi, K.; Tuzi, Y.; Arakawa, I. Development of a new ionization gauge with Bessel Box type energy analyzer. Vacuum 1995, 46, 749–752. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kong, J.; Franklin, N.; Zhou, C.; Chapline, M.; Peng, S.; Cho, K.; Dai, H. Nanotube molecular wires as chemical sensors. Science 2000, 287, 622–625. [Google Scholar]
  10. Varghese, O. K.; Kichambre, P. D.; Gong, D.; Ong, K. G.; Dickey, E. C.; Grimes, C. A. Gas sensing characteristics of multi-wall carbon nanotubes. Sensors and Actuators B 2001, 81, 32–41. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ong, K.; Zeng, K.; Grimes, C. A wireless, passive carbon nanotube-based gas sensor. IEEE Sensor J. 2002, 2, 82–88. [Google Scholar]
  12. Jang, Y. T.; Moon, S. I.; Ahn, J. H.; Lee, Y. H.; Ju, B. K. A simple approach in fabricating chemical sensor using laterally grown multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Sensors and Actuators B 2004, 99, 118–122. [Google Scholar]
  13. Modi, A.; Koratkar, N.; Lass, E.; Wie, B.; Ajayan, P. Miniaturized gas ionization sensors using carbon nanotubes. Nature 2003, 424, 171–174. [Google Scholar]
  14. Gavrilov, S. A.; Il'ichev, E. A.; Poltoratski, E. A.; Rychkov, G. S.; Dvorkin, V. V.; Dzbanovsky, N. N.; Suetin, N. V. Carbon nanotube field emitters for planar emission vacuum micro- and nanoelectronics. Tech. Phys. Lett. 2004, 30, 609–611. [Google Scholar]
  15. Heer, W.; Chatelain, A.; Ugarte, D. A carbon nanotube field-emission electron source. Science 1995, 270, 1179–1180. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Image of pyrex glass and Si substrate after anodic bonding.
Figure 1. Image of pyrex glass and Si substrate after anodic bonding.
Sensors 06 00503f1
Figure 2. Schematic view of the sensor structure and an anodic bonding procedure.
Figure 2. Schematic view of the sensor structure and an anodic bonding procedure.
Sensors 06 00503f2
Figure 3. An image of a 4-inch patterned pyrex glass.
Figure 3. An image of a 4-inch patterned pyrex glass.
Sensors 06 00503f3
Figure 4. A diagram of experimental setup for testing the sensor.
Figure 4. A diagram of experimental setup for testing the sensor.
Sensors 06 00503f4
Figure 5. A typical discharge I-V curve in ideal gas.
Figure 5. A typical discharge I-V curve in ideal gas.
Sensors 06 00503f5
Figure 6. Dependence of the dark current on air concentration at different applied voltages.
Figure 6. Dependence of the dark current on air concentration at different applied voltages.
Sensors 06 00503f6
Figure 7. Dependence of initial breakdown voltage on air concentration.
Figure 7. Dependence of initial breakdown voltage on air concentration.
Sensors 06 00503f7
Figure 8. Dependence of initial breakdown voltage on Ar concentration.
Figure 8. Dependence of initial breakdown voltage on Ar concentration.
Sensors 06 00503f8

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, S. CNT Sensors for Detecting Gases with Low Adsorption Energy by Ionization. Sensors 2006, 6, 503-513. https://doi.org/10.3390/s6050503

AMA Style

Kim S. CNT Sensors for Detecting Gases with Low Adsorption Energy by Ionization. Sensors. 2006; 6(5):503-513. https://doi.org/10.3390/s6050503

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Seongjeen. 2006. "CNT Sensors for Detecting Gases with Low Adsorption Energy by Ionization" Sensors 6, no. 5: 503-513. https://doi.org/10.3390/s6050503

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop