Review Reports
- Yuto Watanabe1,
- Ren Togo2 and
- Keisuke Maeda2
- et al.
Reviewer 1: Huda Ashiba Reviewer 2: G Ajay Kumar Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsComments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsDear Authors,
Appreciate your efforts in preparing manuscript titled "Manipulation Direction: Evaluating Text-guided Image Manipulation Based on Similarity Between Changes of Image and Text Modalities". Manuscript in the current version written well with clear research objective and evidence but there are few minor corrections would greatly benefits the manuscript in improving the quality and clarity.
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 3 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsThis paper proposes a text-guided image manipulation method based the similarity between the changes of image and text. Experimental results show the proposed method outperforms the state-of-the-art approaches. There are some problems of theoretical and experimental analyses in this manuscript and it can be revised in the following aspects.
1. In introduction section, the main contributions of this paper should be clearly listed.
2. All mathematical equations should be carefully check to avoid possible mistakes. For example, in equation (1), the mathematical expressions of x_I, x_I’, y_I and y_I’ should be supplemented; in the title of table 2, ‘d’ should be ‘D’.
3. In figure 5, the comparison is based on single image. The comparison on a whole dataset is more suitable.
Comments on the Quality of English LanguageThe whole paper should be carefully checked to avoid some possible grammatical and typographical errors.
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
Comments and Suggestions for Authorsgood paper
Comments on the Quality of English Languagegood paper