Next Article in Journal
A Neural Networks-Based Hybrid Routing Protocol for Wireless Mesh Networks
Next Article in Special Issue
Automatic Detection of Animals in Mowing Operations Using Thermal Cameras
Previous Article in Journal
Satellite- and Epoch Differenced Precise Point Positioning Based on a Regional Augmentation Network
Open AccessArticle

Estimating Sugarcane Yield Potential Using an In-Season Determination of Normalized Difference Vegetative Index

1
Macon Ridge Research Station, Louisiana State University AgCenter, Winnsboro, LA 71295, USA
2
School of Plant, Environmental, and Soil Science, Louisiana State University AgCenter, Baton Rouge, LA 70801, USA
3
Carrington Research Extension Center, North Dakota State University, Carrington, ND 58421, USA
4
Iberia Research Station, Louisiana State University AgCenter, Jeanerette, LA 70544, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2012, 12(6), 7529-7547; https://doi.org/10.3390/s120607529
Received: 13 April 2012 / Revised: 24 May 2012 / Accepted: 27 May 2012 / Published: 4 June 2012
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sensor-Based Technologies and Processes in Agriculture and Forestry)
Estimating crop yield using remote sensing techniques has proven to be successful. However, sugarcane possesses unique characteristics; such as, a multi-year cropping cycle and plant height-limiting for midseason fertilizer application timing. Our study objective was to determine if sugarcane yield potential could be estimated using an in-season estimation of normalized difference vegetative index (NDVI). Sensor readings were taken using the GreenSeeker® handheld sensor from 2008 to 2011 in St. Gabriel and Jeanerette, LA, USA. In-season estimates of yield (INSEY) values were calculated by dividing NDVI by thermal variables. Optimum timing for estimating sugarcane yield was between 601–750 GDD. In-season estimated yield values improved the yield potential (YP) model compared to using NDVI. Generally, INSEY value showed a positive exponential relationship with yield (r2 values 0.48 and 0.42 for cane tonnage and sugar yield, respectively). When models were separated based on canopy structure there was an increase the strength of the relationship for the erectophile varieties (r2 0.53 and 0.47 for cane tonnage and sugar yield, respectively); however, the model for planophile varieties weakened slightly. Results of this study indicate using an INSEY value for predicting sugarcane yield shows potential of being a valuable management tool for sugarcane producers in Louisiana. View Full-Text
Keywords: sugarcane; nitrogen; NDVI; precision agriculture sugarcane; nitrogen; NDVI; precision agriculture
MDPI and ACS Style

Lofton, J.; Tubana, B.S.; Kanke, Y.; Teboh, J.; Viator, H.; Dalen, M. Estimating Sugarcane Yield Potential Using an In-Season Determination of Normalized Difference Vegetative Index. Sensors 2012, 12, 7529-7547.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop