Topic Editors

ENEA, Department for Sustainability, Division Circular Economy, Research Centre of Portici, P.le E. Fermi 1, 80055 Portici, Italy
Department of Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science, Pegaso Telematic University, Napoli, Italy

Sustainability and Life Cycle Assessment in the Circular Economy: Challenges and Opportunities

Abstract submission deadline
30 April 2027
Manuscript submission deadline
30 June 2027
Viewed by
1796

Topic Information

Dear Colleagues,

In the present, humankind is called upon to face global challenges that threaten the well-being of future generations. Climate change, pollution and resource scarcity are driving the necessity of shifting towards more sustainable and circular practices. However, what appears to be sustainable is not always so, and many claims of “greeness” have proven to be misleading.

Within this context, measuring environmental sustainability becomes a priority and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a widely acknowledged methodology suited for this purpose. According to ISO standards 14040-44 (2006), LCA is a powerful tool for quantifying the environmental impacts associated with a product, process or service. Nevertheless, some limitations have emerged when applying LCA to circular patterns, such as the challenge of dealing with the complexity of circular models, which typically feature numerous feedback loops and shifting interactions among their various elements. The integration of LCA with other approaches may help to address limitations and improve the understanding of complex systems.

This Topic welcomes original research, review, opinion and perspective articles that broadly address the following topics:

  • Sustainability assessment methodologies, including LCA, social LCA and Life Cycle Costing as well as energy, exergy and emergy analysis, etc., and their application to circular systems;
  • Integration of LCA with other analytical approaches for more comprehensive sustainability assessments;
  • Methodological innovations and novel approaches for measuring the circularity of production and consumption systems.

Dr. Gabriella Fiorentino
Dr. Remo Santagata
Topic Editors

Keywords

  • life cycle assessment
  • circular economy
  • sustainability assessment
  • methodological innovation
  • circular systems

Participating Journals

Journal Name Impact Factor CiteScore Launched Year First Decision (median) APC
Atmosphere
atmosphere
2.6 5.4 2010 20.4 Days CHF 2400 Submit
Environments
environments
4.3 5.7 2014 18.6 Days CHF 1800 Submit
Sci
sci
4.1 5.4 2019 28.2 Days CHF 1400 Submit
Sustainability
sustainability
4.1 8.9 2009 16.9 Days CHF 2400 Submit

Preprints.org is a multidisciplinary platform offering a preprint service designed to facilitate the early sharing of your research. It supports and empowers your research journey from the very beginning.

MDPI Topics is collaborating with Preprints.org and has established a direct connection between MDPI journals and the platform. Authors are encouraged to take advantage of this opportunity by posting their preprints at Preprints.org prior to publication:

  1. Share your research immediately: disseminate your ideas prior to publication and establish priority for your work.
  2. Safeguard your intellectual contribution: Protect your ideas with a time-stamped preprint that serves as proof of your research timeline.
  3. Boost visibility and impact: Increase the reach and influence of your research by making it accessible to a global audience.
  4. Gain early feedback: Receive valuable input and insights from peers before submitting to a journal.
  5. Ensure broad indexing: Web of Science (Preprint Citation Index), Google Scholar, Crossref, SHARE, PrePubMed, Scilit and Europe PMC.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Journals
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
26 pages, 639 KB  
Article
Advancing Life Cycle Assessment of Pasture-Based Beef Systems: A High-Resolution Cradle-to-Grave Framework for Global Benchmarking
by Rodolfo Bongiovanni, Leticia Tuninetti, Javier Echazarreta, Ana Muzlera Klappenbach, Javier Lozano, Leonel Alisio and Mariano Avilés
Sustainability 2026, 18(8), 3930; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18083930 - 15 Apr 2026
Viewed by 887
Abstract
Beef production is widely recognized as a significant contributor to global greenhouse gas emissions, making robust and transparent environmental assessments essential for advancing sustainability within supply chains. This study applies a comprehensive cradle-to-grave Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to evaluate the environmental performance of [...] Read more.
Beef production is widely recognized as a significant contributor to global greenhouse gas emissions, making robust and transparent environmental assessments essential for advancing sustainability within supply chains. This study applies a comprehensive cradle-to-grave Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to evaluate the environmental performance of beef destined for export, following ISO 14040, ISO 14044 and ISO 14067 standards and the Product Category Rules for meat of mammals. Sixteen impact categories were quantified for 1 kg of vacuum-packed beef using detailed primary data from a pasture-based production system and a representative processing facility. The total climate change impact was 3.27 × 101 kg CO2eq, with enteric methane and feed production jointly responsible for over 70% of overall impacts. Slaughtering and distribution were associated mainly with fossil energy use and ozone depletion, while soil carbon sequestration partially compensated biogenic emissions. The results were consistent with international benchmarks, highlighting the environmental advantages of pasture-based systems, low fertilizer use, and stable land management. Key hotspots were identified in animal growth, feed efficiency, and manure management, with logistics also contributing notably. Overall, the study provides a high-resolution environmental baseline that can support Environmental Product Declarations and guide targeted mitigation strategies across beef supply chains. While the results are derived from a specific pasture-based production system, the study is positioned as a case-study-based application of a high-resolution LCA framework, illustrating how detailed inventories can support environmental benchmarking and hotspot identification without implying statistical representativeness of all beef production systems. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop