Topic Editors

Department of Chemistry, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Republic of Korea
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy and Health Science, Ajman University, Ajman P.O. Box 346, United Arab Emirates

Challenges and Future Prospects of Antibacterial Therapy, 2nd Edition

Abstract submission deadline
30 September 2026
Manuscript submission deadline
30 November 2026
Viewed by
8742

Topic Information

Dear Colleagues,

Antibiotic resistance has become one of the most pressing global health issues. The increase in multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens has resulted in higher rates of death and illness due to unsuccessful treatments, placing a significant strain on healthcare systems around the world. A key factor in this crisis is the improper and excessive use of antibiotics—not only in medical settings but also in non-medical fields such as agriculture and food production—which has hastened the development and dissemination of resistance. Although there is an urgent demand, creating new and effective treatments against MDR bacteria remains a challenging and ongoing task. Biofilms are microbial communities that adhere to surfaces and resist antibiotics, contributing to chronic infections. Targeting biofilm formation is vital for combating MDR pathogens and improving treatment outcomes. This topic aims to collect pioneering research and thorough reviews that focus on the latest progress in developing novel, biocompatible antimicrobial agents and strategies aimed at counteracting emerging MDR pathogens and biofilm formation. Areas of interest include, but are not limited to, the design, synthesis, and production of new antimicrobial materials and platforms; their biocompatibility assessment; and the evaluation of their therapeutic uses.

Prof. Dr. Kwang-sun Kim
Dr. Zehra Edis
Topic Editors

Keywords

  • antibiotic resistance
  • synergistic antibiotics
  • nanoantibiotics
  • endolysins/bacteriocins
  • outermembrane vesicles
  • photothermal therapy
  • photodynamic therapy
  • ROS-based antimicrobial therapy
  • antibiofilm agents
  • biocompatibility
  • drug delivery system

Participating Journals

Journal Name Impact Factor CiteScore Launched Year First Decision (median) APC
Antibiotics
antibiotics
4.6 8.7 2012 16.4 Days CHF 2900 Submit
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
ijms
4.9 9.0 2000 17.8 Days CHF 2900 Submit
Microbiology Research
microbiolres
2.2 2.8 2010 20.2 Days CHF 1800 Submit
Microorganisms
microorganisms
4.2 7.7 2013 20 Days CHF 2700 Submit
Nanomaterials
nanomaterials
4.3 9.2 2010 14 Days CHF 2400 Submit
Pharmaceuticals
pharmaceuticals
4.8 7.7 2004 16 Days CHF 2900 Submit
Pharmaceutics
pharmaceutics
5.5 10.0 2009 15.7 Days CHF 2900 Submit

Preprints.org is a multidisciplinary platform offering a preprint service designed to facilitate the early sharing of your research. It supports and empowers your research journey from the very beginning.

MDPI Topics is collaborating with Preprints.org and has established a direct connection between MDPI journals and the platform. Authors are encouraged to take advantage of this opportunity by posting their preprints at Preprints.org prior to publication:

  1. Share your research immediately: disseminate your ideas prior to publication and establish priority for your work.
  2. Safeguard your intellectual contribution: Protect your ideas with a time-stamped preprint that serves as proof of your research timeline.
  3. Boost visibility and impact: Increase the reach and influence of your research by making it accessible to a global audience.
  4. Gain early feedback: Receive valuable input and insights from peers before submitting to a journal.
  5. Ensure broad indexing: Web of Science (Preprint Citation Index), Google Scholar, Crossref, SHARE, PrePubMed, Scilit and Europe PMC.

Published Papers (8 papers)

Order results
Result details
Journals
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
10 pages, 1045 KB  
Communication
Monocaprin, Monolaurin, and Monomyristin Eradicate Staphylococcus aureus Persister Cells Through Membrane Disruption
by Dae-Yoon Kim and Tae-Jong Kim
Pharmaceuticals 2026, 19(5), 690; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph19050690 - 28 Apr 2026
Viewed by 304
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Staphylococcus aureus persister cells significantly undermine antimicrobial therapy through their transient antibiotic tolerance, contributing to chronic and recurrent infections. Although monoglycerides have shown potential as membrane-active antimicrobial agents, their effect on persister cells remains insufficiently understood. Methods: In this study, [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Staphylococcus aureus persister cells significantly undermine antimicrobial therapy through their transient antibiotic tolerance, contributing to chronic and recurrent infections. Although monoglycerides have shown potential as membrane-active antimicrobial agents, their effect on persister cells remains insufficiently understood. Methods: In this study, we evaluated the anti-persister activities of monocaprin, monolaurin, and monomyristin against S. aureus persister cells. Mechanistic analyses were performed using membrane permeability assays and fluorescence microscopy. Results: All three monoglycerides reduced persister cell survival, with varying degrees depending on fatty acid chain length. Monolaurin exhibited the greatest anti-persister activity, whereas monocaprin and monomyristin exerted concentration-dependent bactericidal effects. Mechanistic analyses revealed that these compounds increased membrane permeability, thereby compromising cell viability in S. aureus persister cells. In contrast, Tween 80 attenuated both the bactericidal effect and the increase in membrane permeability, supporting the involvement of membrane disruption in their mode of action. Conclusions: The antibacterial activity of monocaprin, monolaurin, and monomyristin against S. aureus is closely associated with membrane damage. These membrane-active monoglycerides represent promising antimicrobial candidates for the eradication of S. aureus persister cells. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 1016 KB  
Review
Burn Infections and Sepsis: Challenges and Future Prospects of Antibacterial Therapy
by Ghazaleh Dadashizadeh, Margarita Elloso and Marc G. Jeschke
Antibiotics 2026, 15(4), 383; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics15040383 - 9 Apr 2026
Viewed by 1065
Abstract
Infectious complications remain a principal determinant of late morbidity and mortality following major thermal injury, reflecting a convergence of barrier disruption, microbial adaptation, and host immune dysfunction. The post-burn environment creates a uniquely permissive niche for pathogen persistence, characterized by altered tissue perfusion, [...] Read more.
Infectious complications remain a principal determinant of late morbidity and mortality following major thermal injury, reflecting a convergence of barrier disruption, microbial adaptation, and host immune dysfunction. The post-burn environment creates a uniquely permissive niche for pathogen persistence, characterized by altered tissue perfusion, biofilm formation, and dynamic shifts in microbial ecology toward multidrug-resistant organisms. Concurrently, profound and evolving changes in host immunity and metabolism reshape both susceptibility to infection and response to therapy. This review integrates current evidence across pathophysiology, microbiology, diagnostics, and treatment, with a focus on challenges that limit effective infection control in burn patients. Particular attention is given to diagnostic uncertainty arising from overlap between sterile inflammation and true infection, the clinical implications of biofilm-associated tolerance, and the impact of burn-specific pharmacokinetic variability on antimicrobial efficacy. We further examine emerging diagnostic and therapeutic innovations, including host-response profiling, rapid molecular detection platforms, and next-generation anti-infective strategies targeting microbial virulence, biofilm structure, and host immune pathways. Despite substantial scientific advances, translation into clinical practice remains constrained by limited burn-specific trials, heterogeneous definitions, and systemic barriers to antimicrobial development. Collectively, these challenges underscore the need for integrated, precision-based approaches that combine early source control, individualized antimicrobial optimization, and advanced diagnostic frameworks. Future progress will depend on coordinated efforts to standardize definitions, generate high-quality multicenter data, and align innovation with clinical applicability across diverse healthcare settings. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 7495 KB  
Article
Comparative Stability and Quality Assessment of Powder–Liquid Double-Chamber Bag Versus Traditional Meropenem Infusions: Implications for Critical Care and Individualized Dosing
by Xiaokai Ren, Xiao Li, Liting Zhang, Xiaofei Zhao, Lei Zhang and Zhanjun Dong
Pharmaceutics 2026, 18(3), 382; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics18030382 - 20 Mar 2026
Viewed by 601
Abstract
Background: Maintaining therapeutic meropenem plasma concentrations requires prolonged infusion, but stability concerns exist between preparation and administration. This study compared the stability and operability of ready-to-use powder–liquid double-chamber bag (DCB) infusions versus traditional powder-for-injection (PFI) meropenem under clinical conditions. Methods: Infusions [...] Read more.
Background: Maintaining therapeutic meropenem plasma concentrations requires prolonged infusion, but stability concerns exist between preparation and administration. This study compared the stability and operability of ready-to-use powder–liquid double-chamber bag (DCB) infusions versus traditional powder-for-injection (PFI) meropenem under clinical conditions. Methods: Infusions at clinically relevant concentrations were stored at 2–8 °C, 25 ± 5 °C, and 40 ± 2 °C for 12 h. Stability assessments included appearance, pH, osmolality, insoluble particle count, meropenem content (HPLC), and impurity A level. Results: DCBs demonstrated superior content uniformity, significantly fewer insoluble particles (p < 0.05), and greater operational simplicity compared to PFI. Refrigeration maintained meropenem content > 95% and effectively suppressed impurity formation for up to 12 h. However, at both room temperature and elevated temperature, impurity A exceeded pharmacopoeial limits within 2 h, particularly at higher concentrations. An innovative bedside solvent volume adjustment method enabled DCBs to deliver high-concentration infusions, facilitating individualized critical care dosing. Conclusions: Compared with traditional powder injection formulations, the Meropenem powder–liquid dual-chamber bag offers more convenient operation under routine preparation conditions and poses a lower risk of contamination during the preparation process. Its stability is more sensitive to storage temperature, requiring strict adherence to refrigeration conditions. When stored under standardized conditions, the dual-chamber bag can better ensure drug efficacy stability and medication safety, making it particularly suitable for clinical emergency use and standardized workflow management. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 1685 KB  
Review
Current Status and Perspectives of Antibacterial Agents Belonging to 2-Oxazolidinones
by Jessica Ceramella, Annaluisa Mariconda, Domenico Iacopetta, Maria Marra, Alessia Catalano, Paola Checconi, Stefano Aquaro, Carmela Saturnino, Pasquale Longo and Maria Stefania Sinicropi
Pharmaceuticals 2026, 19(3), 432; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph19030432 - 6 Mar 2026
Viewed by 950
Abstract
In the last three decades, 2-oxazolidinones have emerged as an important class of inhibitors of bacterial protein synthesis, effective in the treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial infections. From a public health perspective, the importance of 2-oxazolidinones is related to the treatment of tuberculosis [...] Read more.
In the last three decades, 2-oxazolidinones have emerged as an important class of inhibitors of bacterial protein synthesis, effective in the treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial infections. From a public health perspective, the importance of 2-oxazolidinones is related to the treatment of tuberculosis (TB), primarily MDR-TB and extensively drug-resistant XDR-TB. Linezolid, the first oxazolidinone antibiotic approved by FDA, is still used in therapy despite common adverse events, such as myelosuppression and serotonergic toxicity, as well as the increasing percentage of linezolid-resistant bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus, enterococci and methicillin-resistant S. aureus). Tedizolid phosphate was the second commercially available oxazolidinone antibiotic approved, followed by other oxazolidinones (contezolid, radezolid, ranbezolid, sutezolid, delpazolid, cadazolid, TBI-233 and MK-7762) that are in clinical study. Contezolid is approved in China and cadazolid has entered phase III clinical trials. This comprehensive review intends to provide an overview of the compounds belonging to this class already in use in therapy and/or clinical studies and to portray the most significant and recent outcomes regarding new oxazolidinones under study. Three literature databases, i.e., PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar and Scopus, were used for the literature search, particularly focusing on the last five years, and screened using different keywords. The design of new drugs belonging to this class may be of considerable interest to researchers and clinicians, contributing to the discovery of new antibiotics that retain antibacterial activity but have fewer side effects. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

17 pages, 2748 KB  
Article
Impact of Modified Lactoperoxidase Systems on Glycolytic Metabolism and Virulence Factors in Streptococcus mutans
by Marcin Rafał Magacz, Anna Skalniak, Paweł Mamica, Wiktoria Pepasińska, Anna Maria Osyczka, Grzegorz Tylko and Wirginia Krzyściak
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27(2), 799; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27020799 - 13 Jan 2026
Viewed by 406
Abstract
The lactoperoxidase system (LpoS) is an enzymatic antimicrobial mechanism of saliva that oxidizes (pseudo)halide substrates to reactive compounds capable of limiting microbial growth. This study evaluated how different LpoS variants—utilizing iodide (LpoS-I), thiocyanate (LpoS-SCN), selenocyanate (LpoS-SeCN), and [...] Read more.
The lactoperoxidase system (LpoS) is an enzymatic antimicrobial mechanism of saliva that oxidizes (pseudo)halide substrates to reactive compounds capable of limiting microbial growth. This study evaluated how different LpoS variants—utilizing iodide (LpoS-I), thiocyanate (LpoS-SCN), selenocyanate (LpoS-SeCN), and a thiocyanate–iodide mixture (LpoS-SCN + I)—affect virulence, metabolism, and biofilm structure in Streptococcus mutans. Using qRT-PCR, pyruvate assays, MTT reduction, and confocal microscopy, we found that LpoS-I most effectively reduced atpD and ldh expression, impaired acid tolerance, and decreased lactate and pyruvate production. LpoS-SCN and LpoS-SeCN also downregulated atpD and gtfB, although LpoS-SeCN upregulated ldh. Despite minimal structural biofilm disruption, LpoS-I markedly inhibited intracellular and extracellular pyruvate accumulation, suggesting altered glycolytic flux. These findings indicate that iodide-based LPO systems modulate key metabolic and regulatory pathways in S. mutans and may hold potential for inclusion in anticaries oral formulations. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 1017 KB  
Review
CRISPR–Cas-Mediated Reprogramming Strategies to Overcome Antimicrobial Resistance
by Byeol Yoon, Jang Ah Kim and Yoo Kyung Kang
Pharmaceutics 2026, 18(1), 95; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics18010095 - 11 Jan 2026
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1638
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is escalating worldwide, posing a serious threat to global public health by driving infections that are no longer treatable with conventional antibiotics. CRISPR–Cas technology offers a programmable and highly specific therapeutic alternative by directly targeting the genetic determinants responsible for [...] Read more.
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is escalating worldwide, posing a serious threat to global public health by driving infections that are no longer treatable with conventional antibiotics. CRISPR–Cas technology offers a programmable and highly specific therapeutic alternative by directly targeting the genetic determinants responsible for resistance. Various CRISPR systems can restore antibiotic susceptibility and induce selective bactericidal effects by eliminating resistance genes, disrupting biofilm formation, and inhibiting virulence pathways. Moreover, CRISPR can suppress horizontal gene transfer (HGT) by removing mobile genetic elements such as plasmids, thereby limiting the ecological spread of AMR across humans, animals, and the environment. Advances in delivery platforms—including conjugative plasmids, phagemids, and nanoparticle-based carriers—are expanding the translational potential of CRISPR-based antimicrobial strategies. Concurrent progress in Cas protein engineering, spatiotemporal activity regulation, and AI-driven optimization is expected to overcome current technical barriers. Collectively, these developments position CRISPR-based antimicrobials as next-generation precision therapeutics capable of treating refractory bacterial infections while simultaneously suppressing the dissemination of antibiotic resistance. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 4082 KB  
Article
Biogenic Selenium Nanoparticles from Lactiplantibacillus plantarum as a Potent Antimicrobial Agent Against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
by Gyeong-min Kim, SeCheol Oh and Kwang-sun Kim
Pharmaceutics 2026, 18(1), 14; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics18010014 - 22 Dec 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1121
Abstract
Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) remains a major global health concern owing to its multidrug resistance and persistence despite continued antibiotic development. Eco-friendly nanomaterials such as selenium nanoparticles (SeNPs) have emerged as promising antimicrobial alternatives because of their high biocompatibility and lower toxicity [...] Read more.
Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) remains a major global health concern owing to its multidrug resistance and persistence despite continued antibiotic development. Eco-friendly nanomaterials such as selenium nanoparticles (SeNPs) have emerged as promising antimicrobial alternatives because of their high biocompatibility and lower toxicity compared to conventional metallic nanoparticles. In this study, we investigated the inhibitory effects and underlying mechanisms of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (LP)–derived SeNPs (LP-SeNPs) on MRSA. Methods: SeNPs were biosynthesized using the antibacterial cell-free supernatant (CFS) of LP, which provides naturally reducing and stabilizing biomolecules. The resulting LP-SeNPs were characterized by physicochemical and structural analyses and compared to chemically synthesized SeNPs (Chem-SeNPs). Antibacterial activity was assessed through minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) testing, time-kill kinetics, and cell viability assays. Results: LP-SeNPs, which were spherical with an average diameter of 107 nm, exhibited selective antibacterial activity against Gram-positive bacteria and showed no effect on Gram-negative strains. Notably, all six MRSA isolates demonstrated high susceptibility, with MIC values approximately 100-fold lower than that of S. aureus ATCC 25923, a non-MRSA reference strain. LP-SeNPs were also non-cytotoxic up to 20-fold the MIC (IC50 > 10 µg/mL). Mechanistic analyses indicated that disruption of the bacterial cell membrane was the primary antibacterial mechanism, supported by additional contributions from reactive oxygen species generation and protein synthesis inhibition. Conclusions: LP-SeNPs represent a sustainable, biocompatible, and potent antibacterial nanoplatform with strong selectivity for Gram-positive pathogens, particularly MRSA. These findings highlight their potential as eco-friendly and targeted therapeutic strategies for combating MRSA infections. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 235 KB  
Article
Clinical Outcomes of Piperacillin/Tazobactam Treatment in Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (OPAT) Programs: Comparison of Two Models of Opat Care
by Santiago J. Lora-Escobar, Laura Herrera-Hidalgo, Nerea Castillo-Fernández, Zaira R. Palacios-Baena, Rafael Luque-Márquez, Arístides De Alarcón, Ana Belén Guisado-Gil, Belén Gutierrez-Gutierrez, María Dolores Navarro-Amuedo, Julia Praena-Segovia, Marta Mejías Trueba, Juan Manuel Carmona-Caballero, José Manuel Sánchez Oliva, María Victoria Gil-Navarro and Luis E. López-Cortés
Pharmaceutics 2025, 17(11), 1429; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics17111429 - 4 Nov 2025
Viewed by 1186
Abstract
Objectives: Piperacillin/tazobactam (P/T) is a broad-spectrum β-lactam antibiotic frequently used in outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy programs (OPAT). We aim to compare the clinical outcomes of P/T treatment in two models of OPAT care in order to maximize the utilization of health resources. [...] Read more.
Objectives: Piperacillin/tazobactam (P/T) is a broad-spectrum β-lactam antibiotic frequently used in outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy programs (OPAT). We aim to compare the clinical outcomes of P/T treatment in two models of OPAT care in order to maximize the utilization of health resources. Material and methods: We conducted a prospective observational study with retrospective analysis of a cohort of patients treated with P/T delivered every 24 or 48 h in an OPAT program. The primary outcomes were treatment failure during the OPAT episode and 30 day treatment failure. A bivariate and multivariate logistic regression model was built. A two-sided p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Between 2012 and 2022, 247 patients were treated with P/T. Treatment was delivered daily in 176 patients (Group 24) and every two days in 71 patients (Group 48). The rate of treatment failure during OPAT in Group 24 and Group 48 was 12.4% (n = 22) and 5.6% (n = 4), respectively (p = 0.112); and the rate of treatment failure 30 days after OPAT treatment end was 18.2% (n = 32) and 21.1% (n = 15) in Group 24 and Group 48, respectively (p = 0.594). Treatment every 24 or 48 h was not associated with higher treatment failure during OPAT or 30 days after finishing OPAT in either bivariate or multivariate analysis. Conclusions: P/T administration in OPAT programs being replaced every two days is feasible without an increase in treatment failure, relapse, or mortality compared to daily drug replacement. These findings should motivate further research to facilitate the implementation of this novel delivery strategy in OPAT programs. Full article
Back to TopTop