Testimonials
What Editors, Authors and Reviewers are saying
The publication process has clear and precise criteria, and the academic community participating gives very useful reviews that help to improve the presentation of research results. There is a clear
[...] Read more.
The publication process has clear and precise criteria, and the academic community participating gives very useful reviews that help to improve the presentation of research results. There is a clear and transparent review procedure, which is a kind of scientific discourse, and is extremely necessary in this environment for innovative ideas.
Article in Energies:
Empowering Sustainable Energy Solutions through Real-Time Data, Visualization, and Fuzzy Logic
Less
I first knew of MDPI journals several years ago and their efficiency, rigor and support for reviewers and authors have been primordial and of the best quality.
[...] Read more.
I first knew of MDPI journals several years ago and their efficiency, rigor and support for reviewers and authors have been primordial and of the best quality.
Special Issue in Energies:
Energy Water Food Nexus
Less
Thank you very much for the reliable and fast peer-review process I would like to thank the Editors for their cooperation. It should be emphasized that the Reviews were appropriate
[...] Read more.
Thank you very much for the reliable and fast peer-review process I would like to thank the Editors for their cooperation. It should be emphasized that the Reviews were appropriate and thorough and identified shortcomings. This is why we made changes according to the reviewer's suggestions, which made this manuscript better. Once again, thank you very much for your help during the peer-review process.
Article in Antioxidants:
Chemical Composition, Antioxidant Properties and Sensory Aspects of Sponge Cakes Supplemented with Edible Insect Flours
Less
The peer-review process was very fast and fair, improving our manuscript. I was impressed. The editorial staff of Antioxidants is professional and helpful. Overall, I was very satisfied with the
[...] Read more.
The peer-review process was very fast and fair, improving our manuscript. I was impressed. The editorial staff of Antioxidants is professional and helpful. Overall, I was very satisfied with the entire submission and publication process and very pleased to publish our work in this journal.
Article in Antioxidants:
Comparative Study of Hydroxytyrosol Acetate and Hydroxytyrosol in Activating Phase II Enzymes
Less
We were impressed with the handling of our manuscript in Antioxidants. We want to convey our deep appreciation for the assistance and cooperation we received from the editorial staff.
[...] Read more.
We were impressed with the handling of our manuscript in Antioxidants. We want to convey our deep appreciation for the assistance and cooperation we received from the editorial staff. Valuable and professional comments from the reviewers allowed us to enhance the manuscript's quality. The entire process was conducted with professionalism and speed. I wholeheartedly recommend publishing in Antioxidants. It was a very positive experience.
Article in Antioxidants:
Antioxidant and Cytotoxic Potential of Carlina vulgaris Extract and Bioactivity-Guided Isolation of Cytotoxic Components
Less
We have published multiple articles with MDPI, and each submission process was a positive experience. The reviewers were well chosen, and the peer-review process was thorough and greatly improved the
[...] Read more.
We have published multiple articles with MDPI, and each submission process was a positive experience. The reviewers were well chosen, and the peer-review process was thorough and greatly improved the quality of our manuscript each time. Overall, we would like to extend our sincere gratitude to the editorial staff who proved helpful during each step of the submission process. We will be considering Antioxidants and other MDPI journals for future articles.
Article in Antioxidants:
Sleep Deprivation-Induced Oxidative Stress in Rat Models: A Scoping Systematic Review
Less
It was a pleasure to publish in Antioxidants. We would like to express our gratitude for the support and collaboration provided by the editorial team and all of the
[...] Read more.
It was a pleasure to publish in Antioxidants. We would like to express our gratitude for the support and collaboration provided by the editorial team and all of the people involved. Our sincere appreciation extends to Ms. Effie Cui for her invaluable support and guidance throughout the entire process. In addition, we extend our thanks to the reviewers whose contributions and feedback enhanced the quality of the manuscript. The whole process was highly professional, fast, efficient, transparent, and enjoyable.
Article in Antioxidants:
AMPK-Mediated Phosphorylation of Nrf2 at S374/S408/S433 Favors Its βTrCP2-Mediated Degradation in KEAP1-Deficient Cells
Less
When I need open-access publication of my research quickly, Antioxidants (MDPI) is my personal preference. The review procedure usually goes quickly, and getting in touch with the editors is easy.
[...] Read more.
When I need open-access publication of my research quickly, Antioxidants (MDPI) is my personal preference. The review procedure usually goes quickly, and getting in touch with the editors is easy. The final editing process and manuscript correction are both very simple. The text revisions made by the editorial staff are extremely accurate.
Article in Antioxidants:
Insight into the Antioxidant Activity of 1,8-Dihydroxynaphthalene Allomelanin Nanoparticles
Less
Very efficient and professional Editorial team. Thank you.
[...] Read more.
Very efficient and professional Editorial team. Thank you.
Reviewer of
Energies
Less
I have had an extremely positive experience as a manuscript author and reviewer at MDPI. This refers to the exceptional professionalism of the editorial staff in terms of the expeditious
[...] Read more.
I have had an extremely positive experience as a manuscript author and reviewer at MDPI. This refers to the exceptional professionalism of the editorial staff in terms of the expeditious process from submission to publication of the manuscript, selection of reviewers, and the monitoring of the flow of each work for potential publication in the journals.
Reviewer of
Energies
Less
Reviewing for MDPI is a great experience: the platform is easy to handle; if more time is needed to complete the review it is allowed; the editors are kind and
[...] Read more.
Reviewing for MDPI is a great experience: the platform is easy to handle; if more time is needed to complete the review it is allowed; the editors are kind and try and arrange things. All is good!
Reviewer of
Energies
Less
I have been working with MDPI since 2019. I have published in several of the journals, and have received respect, good treatment, and fairness. I am very satisfied with the
[...] Read more.
I have been working with MDPI since 2019. I have published in several of the journals, and have received respect, good treatment, and fairness. I am very satisfied with the work with MDPI and in this sense I no longer work with other publishers when it comes to submitting my scientific works.
Article in Energies:
Analysis and Design of Resonant DC/AC Converters with Energy Dosing for Induction Heating
Less
Displaying testimonial 141-160 on page 8 of 72.