Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (29)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = transcription replication conflicts

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
34 pages, 1773 KB  
Review
Participants in Transcription–Replication Conflict and Their Role in Formation and Resolution of R-Loops
by Anastasiia T. Davletgildeeva and Nikita A. Kuznetsov
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(14), 6951; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26146951 - 19 Jul 2025
Viewed by 1102
Abstract
The DNA of all living organisms is a common matrix for both replication and transcription processes. This sometimes leads to inevitable collisions between DNA replication and transcription machinery. There is plethora of evidence demonstrating that such collisions (or TRCs) are one of the [...] Read more.
The DNA of all living organisms is a common matrix for both replication and transcription processes. This sometimes leads to inevitable collisions between DNA replication and transcription machinery. There is plethora of evidence demonstrating that such collisions (or TRCs) are one of the most common and significant reasons for genomic instability. One of the key outcomes of TRCs is the accumulation of non-canonical DNA secondary structures, including R-loops. R-loops are three-stranded DNA–RNA hybrids with a displaced third single-stranded DNA fragment. Although R-loops are thought to play several functional roles in biological processes, an imbalance in their metabolism has been proven to have severe consequences. In this review, we attempt to summarize the current knowledge of the participants in the process of R-loop regulation in cells, with an emphasis on eukaryotic systems. We also touch upon the conditions favoring TRCs and the possible ways of dealing with these conflicts. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1849 KB  
Review
The MCM2-7 Complex: Roles beyond DNA Unwinding
by Brooke D. Rankin and Susannah Rankin
Biology 2024, 13(4), 258; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13040258 - 13 Apr 2024
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 4379
Abstract
The MCM2-7 complex is a hexameric protein complex that serves as a DNA helicase. It unwinds the DNA double helix during DNA replication, thereby providing the single-stranded replication template. In recent years, it has become clear that the MCM2-7 complex has additional functions [...] Read more.
The MCM2-7 complex is a hexameric protein complex that serves as a DNA helicase. It unwinds the DNA double helix during DNA replication, thereby providing the single-stranded replication template. In recent years, it has become clear that the MCM2-7 complex has additional functions that extend well beyond its role in DNA replication. Through physical and functional interactions with different pathways, it impacts other nuclear events and activities, including folding of the genome, histone inheritance, chromosome segregation, DNA damage sensing and repair, and gene transcription. Collectively, the diverse roles of the MCM2-7 complex suggest it plays a critical role in maintaining genome integrity by integrating the regulation of DNA replication with other pathways in the nucleus. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Replication Licensing System)
Show Figures

Figure 1

31 pages, 1943 KB  
Review
R-Loops in Genome Instability and Cancer
by Fang Li, Alyan Zafar, Liang Luo, Ariana Maria Denning, Jun Gu, Ansley Bennett, Fenghua Yuan and Yanbin Zhang
Cancers 2023, 15(20), 4986; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15204986 - 14 Oct 2023
Cited by 23 | Viewed by 5701
Abstract
R-loops are unique, three-stranded nucleic acid structures that primarily form when an RNA molecule displaces one DNA strand and anneals to the complementary DNA strand in a double-stranded DNA molecule. R-loop formation can occur during natural processes, such as transcription, in which the [...] Read more.
R-loops are unique, three-stranded nucleic acid structures that primarily form when an RNA molecule displaces one DNA strand and anneals to the complementary DNA strand in a double-stranded DNA molecule. R-loop formation can occur during natural processes, such as transcription, in which the nascent RNA molecule remains hybridized with the template DNA strand, while the non-template DNA strand is displaced. However, R-loops can also arise due to many non-natural processes, including DNA damage, dysregulation of RNA degradation pathways, and defects in RNA processing. Despite their prevalence throughout the whole genome, R-loops are predominantly found in actively transcribed gene regions, enabling R-loops to serve seemingly controversial roles. On one hand, the pathological accumulation of R-loops contributes to genome instability, a hallmark of cancer development that plays a role in tumorigenesis, cancer progression, and therapeutic resistance. On the other hand, R-loops play critical roles in regulating essential processes, such as gene expression, chromatin organization, class-switch recombination, mitochondrial DNA replication, and DNA repair. In this review, we summarize discoveries related to the formation, suppression, and removal of R-loops and their influence on genome instability, DNA repair, and oncogenic events. We have also discussed therapeutical opportunities by targeting pathological R-loops. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Cancer Biology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1801 KB  
Review
How Different Pathologies Are Affected by IFIT Expression
by Justin H. Franco, Saurabh Chattopadhyay and Zhixing K. Pan
Viruses 2023, 15(2), 342; https://doi.org/10.3390/v15020342 - 25 Jan 2023
Cited by 22 | Viewed by 4931
Abstract
The type-I interferon (IFN) system represents the first line of defense against viral pathogens. Recognition of the virus initiates complex signaling pathways that result in the transcriptional induction of IFNs, which are then secreted. Secreted IFNs stimulate nearby cells and result in the [...] Read more.
The type-I interferon (IFN) system represents the first line of defense against viral pathogens. Recognition of the virus initiates complex signaling pathways that result in the transcriptional induction of IFNs, which are then secreted. Secreted IFNs stimulate nearby cells and result in the production of numerous proinflammatory cytokines and antiviral factors. Of particular note, IFN-induced tetratricopeptide repeat (IFIT) proteins have been thoroughly studied because of their antiviral activity against different viral pathogens. Although classically studied as an antiviral protein, IFIT expression has recently been investigated in the context of nonviral pathologies, such as cancer and sepsis. In oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), IFIT1 and IFIT3 promote metastasis, while IFIT2 exhibits the opposite effect. The role of IFIT proteins during bacterial/fungal sepsis is still under investigation, with studies showing conflicting roles for IFIT2 in disease severity. In the setting of viral sepsis, IFIT proteins play a key role in clearing viral infection. As a result, many viral pathogens, such as SARS-CoV-2, employ mechanisms to inhibit the type-I IFN system and promote viral replication. In cancers that are characterized by upregulated IFIT proteins, medications that decrease IFIT expression may reduce metastasis and improve survival rates. Likewise, in cases of viral sepsis, therapeutics that increase IFIT expression may improve viral clearance and reduce the risk of septic shock. By understanding the effect of IFIT proteins in different pathologies, novel therapeutics can be developed to halt disease progression. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Interferons in Viral Infections)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 1079 KB  
Review
Revisiting the Function of p21CDKN1A in DNA Repair: The Influence of Protein Interactions and Stability
by Giulio Ticli, Ornella Cazzalini, Lucia A. Stivala and Ennio Prosperi
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(13), 7058; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23137058 - 24 Jun 2022
Cited by 44 | Viewed by 4957
Abstract
The p21CDKN1A protein is an important player in the maintenance of genome stability through its function as a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, leading to cell-cycle arrest after genotoxic damage. In the DNA damage response, p21 interacts with specific proteins to integrate cell-cycle arrest [...] Read more.
The p21CDKN1A protein is an important player in the maintenance of genome stability through its function as a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, leading to cell-cycle arrest after genotoxic damage. In the DNA damage response, p21 interacts with specific proteins to integrate cell-cycle arrest with processes such as transcription, apoptosis, DNA repair, and cell motility. By associating with Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen (PCNA), the master of DNA replication, p21 is able to inhibit DNA synthesis. However, to avoid conflicts with this process, p21 protein levels are finely regulated by pathways of proteasomal degradation during the S phase, and in all the phases of the cell cycle, after DNA damage. Several lines of evidence have indicated that p21 is required for the efficient repair of different types of genotoxic lesions and, more recently, that p21 regulates DNA replication fork speed. Therefore, whether p21 is an inhibitor, or rather a regulator, of DNA replication and repair needs to be re-evaluated in light of these findings. In this review, we will discuss the lines of evidence describing how p21 is involved in DNA repair and will focus on the influence of protein interactions and p21 stability on the efficiency of DNA repair mechanisms. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 4423 KB  
Review
Nucleases and Co-Factors in DNA Replication Stress Responses
by Jac A. Nickoloff, Neelam Sharma, Lynn Taylor, Sage J. Allen and Robert Hromas
DNA 2022, 2(1), 68-85; https://doi.org/10.3390/dna2010006 - 1 Mar 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 5772
Abstract
DNA replication stress is a constant threat that cells must manage to proliferate and maintain genome integrity. DNA replication stress responses, a subset of the broader DNA damage response (DDR), operate when the DNA replication machinery (replisome) is blocked or replication forks collapse [...] Read more.
DNA replication stress is a constant threat that cells must manage to proliferate and maintain genome integrity. DNA replication stress responses, a subset of the broader DNA damage response (DDR), operate when the DNA replication machinery (replisome) is blocked or replication forks collapse during S phase. There are many sources of replication stress, such as DNA lesions caused by endogenous and exogenous agents including commonly used cancer therapeutics, and difficult-to-replicate DNA sequences comprising fragile sites, G-quadraplex DNA, hairpins at trinucleotide repeats, and telomeres. Replication stress is also a consequence of conflicts between opposing transcription and replication, and oncogenic stress which dysregulates replication origin firing and fork progression. Cells initially respond to replication stress by protecting blocked replisomes, but if the offending problem (e.g., DNA damage) is not bypassed or resolved in a timely manner, forks may be cleaved by nucleases, inducing a DNA double-strand break (DSB) and providing a means to accurately restart stalled forks via homologous recombination. However, DSBs pose their own risks to genome stability if left unrepaired or misrepaired. Here we focus on replication stress response systems, comprising DDR signaling, fork protection, and fork processing by nucleases that promote fork repair and restart. Replication stress nucleases include MUS81, EEPD1, Metnase, CtIP, MRE11, EXO1, DNA2-BLM, SLX1-SLX4, XPF-ERCC1-SLX4, Artemis, XPG, and FEN1. Replication stress factors are important in cancer etiology as suppressors of genome instability associated with oncogenic mutations, and as potential cancer therapy targets to enhance the efficacy of chemo- and radiotherapeutics. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

23 pages, 2866 KB  
Review
The PRP19 Ubiquitin Ligase, Standing at the Cross-Roads of mRNA Processing and Genome Stability
by Mouhamed Idrissou and Alexandre Maréchal
Cancers 2022, 14(4), 878; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14040878 - 10 Feb 2022
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 4663
Abstract
mRNA processing factors are increasingly being recognized as important regulators of genome stability. By preventing and resolving RNA:DNA hybrids that form co-transcriptionally, these proteins help avoid replication–transcription conflicts and thus contribute to genome stability through their normal function in RNA maturation. Some of [...] Read more.
mRNA processing factors are increasingly being recognized as important regulators of genome stability. By preventing and resolving RNA:DNA hybrids that form co-transcriptionally, these proteins help avoid replication–transcription conflicts and thus contribute to genome stability through their normal function in RNA maturation. Some of these factors also have direct roles in the activation of the DNA damage response and in DNA repair. One of the most intriguing cases is that of PRP19, an evolutionarily conserved essential E3 ubiquitin ligase that promotes mRNA splicing, but also participates directly in ATR activation, double-strand break resection and mitosis. Here, we review historical and recent work on PRP19 and its associated proteins, highlighting their multifarious cellular functions as central regulators of spliceosome activity, R-loop homeostasis, DNA damage signaling and repair and cell division. Finally, we discuss open questions that are bound to shed further light on the functions of PRP19-containing complexes in both normal and cancer cells. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Role of the Ubiquitin-Proteasome-System in Human Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1463 KB  
Review
R-Loop-Associated Genomic Instability and Implication of WRN and WRNIP1
by Veronica Marabitti, Pasquale Valenzisi, Giorgia Lillo, Eva Malacaria, Valentina Palermo, Pietro Pichierri and Annapaola Franchitto
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(3), 1547; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23031547 - 28 Jan 2022
Cited by 20 | Viewed by 6596
Abstract
Maintenance of genome stability is crucial for cell survival and relies on accurate DNA replication. However, replication fork progression is under constant attack from different exogenous and endogenous factors that can give rise to replication stress, a source of genomic instability and a [...] Read more.
Maintenance of genome stability is crucial for cell survival and relies on accurate DNA replication. However, replication fork progression is under constant attack from different exogenous and endogenous factors that can give rise to replication stress, a source of genomic instability and a notable hallmark of pre-cancerous and cancerous cells. Notably, one of the major natural threats for DNA replication is transcription. Encounters or conflicts between replication and transcription are unavoidable, as they compete for the same DNA template, so that collisions occur quite frequently. The main harmful transcription-associated structures are R-loops. These are DNA structures consisting of a DNA–RNA hybrid and a displaced single-stranded DNA, which play important physiological roles. However, if their homeostasis is altered, they become a potent source of replication stress and genome instability giving rise to several human diseases, including cancer. To combat the deleterious consequences of pathological R-loop persistence, cells have evolved multiple mechanisms, and an ever growing number of replication fork protection factors have been implicated in preventing/removing these harmful structures; however, many others are perhaps still unknown. In this review, we report the current knowledge on how aberrant R-loops affect genome integrity and how they are handled, and we discuss our recent findings on the role played by two fork protection factors, the Werner syndrome protein (WRN) and the Werner helicase-interacting protein 1 (WRNIP1) in response to R-loop-induced genome instability. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1119 KB  
Review
Transcription–Replication Coordination
by Marco Saponaro
Life 2022, 12(1), 108; https://doi.org/10.3390/life12010108 - 13 Jan 2022
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 4869
Abstract
Transcription and replication are the two most essential processes that a cell does with its DNA: they allow cells to express the genomic content that is required for their functions and to create a perfect copy of this genomic information to pass on [...] Read more.
Transcription and replication are the two most essential processes that a cell does with its DNA: they allow cells to express the genomic content that is required for their functions and to create a perfect copy of this genomic information to pass on to the daughter cells. Nevertheless, these two processes are in a constant ambivalent relationship. When transcription and replication occupy the same regions, there is the possibility of conflicts between transcription and replication as transcription can impair DNA replication progression leading to increased DNA damage. Nevertheless, DNA replication origins are preferentially located in open chromatin next to actively transcribed regions, meaning that the possibility of conflicts is potentially an accepted incident for cells. Data in the literature point both towards the existence or not of coordination between these two processes to avoid the danger of collisions. Several reviews have been published on transcription–replication conflicts, but we focus here on the most recent findings that relate to how these two processes are coordinated in eukaryotes, considering advantages and disadvantages from coordination, how likely conflicts are at any given time, and which are their potential hotspots in the genome. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Transcription-Associated Genetic Instability)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 2336 KB  
Article
Structural Insight into the Mechanism of PALB2 Interaction with MRG15
by Jennifer Redington, Jaigeeth Deveryshetty, Lakshmi Kanikkannan, Ian Miller and Sergey Korolev
Genes 2021, 12(12), 2002; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12122002 - 17 Dec 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3804
Abstract
The tumor suppressor protein partner and localizer of BRCA2 (PALB2) orchestrates the interactions between breast cancer susceptibility proteins 1 and 2 (BRCA1, -2) that are critical for genome stability, homologous recombination (HR) and DNA repair. PALB2 mutations predispose patients to a spectrum of [...] Read more.
The tumor suppressor protein partner and localizer of BRCA2 (PALB2) orchestrates the interactions between breast cancer susceptibility proteins 1 and 2 (BRCA1, -2) that are critical for genome stability, homologous recombination (HR) and DNA repair. PALB2 mutations predispose patients to a spectrum of cancers, including breast and ovarian cancers. PALB2 localizes HR machinery to chromatin and links it with transcription through multiple DNA and protein interactions. This includes its interaction with MRG15 (Morf-related gene on chromosome 15), which is part of many transcription complexes, including the HAT-associated and the HDAC-associated complexes. This interaction is critical for PALB2 localization in actively transcribed genes, where transcription/replication conflicts lead to frequent replication stress and DNA breaks. We solved the crystal structure of the MRG15 MRG domain bound to the PALB2 peptide and investigated the effect of several PALB2 mutations, including patient-derived variants. PALB2 interacts with an extended surface of the MRG that is known to interact with other proteins. This, together with a nanomolar affinity, suggests that the binding of MRG15 partners, including PALB2, to this region is mutually exclusive. Breast cancer-related mutations of PALB2 cause only minor attenuation of the binding affinity. New data reveal the mechanism of PALB2-MRG15 binding, advancing our understanding of PALB2 function in chromosome maintenance and tumorigenesis. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1281 KB  
Review
Does the Zinc Finger Antiviral Protein (ZAP) Shape the Evolution of Herpesvirus Genomes?
by Yao-Tang Lin, Long-Fung Chau, Hannah Coutts, Matin Mahmoudi, Vayalena Drampa, Chen-Hsuin Lee, Alex Brown, David J. Hughes and Finn Grey
Viruses 2021, 13(9), 1857; https://doi.org/10.3390/v13091857 - 17 Sep 2021
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3748
Abstract
An evolutionary arms race occurs between viruses and hosts. Hosts have developed an array of antiviral mechanisms aimed at inhibiting replication and spread of viruses, reducing their fitness, and ultimately minimising pathogenic effects. In turn, viruses have evolved sophisticated counter-measures that mediate evasion [...] Read more.
An evolutionary arms race occurs between viruses and hosts. Hosts have developed an array of antiviral mechanisms aimed at inhibiting replication and spread of viruses, reducing their fitness, and ultimately minimising pathogenic effects. In turn, viruses have evolved sophisticated counter-measures that mediate evasion of host defence mechanisms. A key aspect of host defences is the ability to differentiate between self and non-self. Previous studies have demonstrated significant suppression of CpG and UpA dinucleotide frequencies in the coding regions of RNA and small DNA viruses. Artificially increasing these dinucleotide frequencies results in a substantial attenuation of virus replication, suggesting dinucleotide bias could facilitate recognition of non-self RNA. The interferon-inducible gene, zinc finger antiviral protein (ZAP) is the host factor responsible for sensing CpG dinucleotides in viral RNA and restricting RNA viruses through direct binding and degradation of the target RNA. Herpesviruses are large DNA viruses that comprise three subfamilies, alpha, beta and gamma, which display divergent CpG dinucleotide patterns within their genomes. ZAP has recently been shown to act as a host restriction factor against human cytomegalovirus (HCMV), a beta-herpesvirus, which in turn evades ZAP detection by suppressing CpG levels in the major immediate-early transcript IE1, one of the first genes expressed by the virus. While suppression of CpG dinucleotides allows evasion of ZAP targeting, synonymous changes in nucleotide composition that cause genome biases, such as low GC content, can cause inefficient gene expression, especially in unspliced transcripts. To maintain compact genomes, the majority of herpesvirus transcripts are unspliced. Here we discuss how the conflicting pressures of ZAP evasion, the need to maintain compact genomes through the use of unspliced transcripts and maintaining efficient gene expression may have shaped the evolution of herpesvirus genomes, leading to characteristic CpG dinucleotide patterns. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 601 KB  
Review
Transcription-Replication Collisions—A Series of Unfortunate Events
by Commodore St Germain, Hongchang Zhao and Jacqueline H. Barlow
Biomolecules 2021, 11(8), 1249; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11081249 - 21 Aug 2021
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 5981
Abstract
Transcription-replication interactions occur when DNA replication encounters genomic regions undergoing transcription. Both replication and transcription are essential for life and use the same DNA template making conflicts unavoidable. R-loops, DNA supercoiling, DNA secondary structure, and chromatin-binding proteins are all potential obstacles for processive [...] Read more.
Transcription-replication interactions occur when DNA replication encounters genomic regions undergoing transcription. Both replication and transcription are essential for life and use the same DNA template making conflicts unavoidable. R-loops, DNA supercoiling, DNA secondary structure, and chromatin-binding proteins are all potential obstacles for processive replication or transcription and pose an even more potent threat to genome integrity when these processes co-occur. It is critical to maintaining high fidelity and processivity of transcription and replication while navigating through a complex chromatin environment, highlighting the importance of defining cellular pathways regulating transcription-replication interaction formation, evasion, and resolution. Here we discuss how transcription influences replication fork stability, and the safeguards that have evolved to navigate transcription-replication interactions and maintain genome integrity in mammalian cells. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Genetics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

30 pages, 14258 KB  
Review
R-Loops and Its Chro-Mates: The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde
by Sidrit Uruci, Calvin Shun Yu Lo, David Wheeler and Nitika Taneja
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(16), 8850; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22168850 - 17 Aug 2021
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 10258
Abstract
Since their discovery, R-loops have been associated with both physiological and pathological functions that are conserved across species. R-loops are a source of replication stress and genome instability, as seen in neurodegenerative disorders and cancer. In response, cells have evolved pathways to prevent [...] Read more.
Since their discovery, R-loops have been associated with both physiological and pathological functions that are conserved across species. R-loops are a source of replication stress and genome instability, as seen in neurodegenerative disorders and cancer. In response, cells have evolved pathways to prevent R-loop accumulation as well as to resolve them. A growing body of evidence correlates R-loop accumulation with changes in the epigenetic landscape. However, the role of chromatin modification and remodeling in R-loops homeostasis remains unclear. This review covers various mechanisms precluding R-loop accumulation and highlights the role of chromatin modifiers and remodelers in facilitating timely R-loop resolution. We also discuss the enigmatic role of RNA:DNA hybrids in facilitating DNA repair, epigenetic landscape and the potential role of replication fork preservation pathways, active fork stability and stalled fork protection pathways, in avoiding replication-transcription conflicts. Finally, we discuss the potential role of several Chro-Mates (chromatin modifiers and remodelers) in the likely differentiation between persistent/detrimental R-loops and transient/benign R-loops that assist in various physiological processes relevant for therapeutic interventions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue RNA-Binding Proteins and Their Emerging Roles in Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

30 pages, 20553 KB  
Review
Transcription/Replication Conflicts in Tumorigenesis and Their Potential Role as Novel Therapeutic Targets in Multiple Myeloma
by Laure Dutrieux, Yea-Lih Lin, Malik Lutzmann, Raphaël Rodriguez, Michel Cogné, Philippe Pasero and Jérôme Moreaux
Cancers 2021, 13(15), 3755; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13153755 - 27 Jul 2021
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 5244
Abstract
Plasma cells (PCs) have an essential role in humoral immune response by secretion of antibodies, and represent the final stage of B lymphocytes differentiation. During this differentiation, the pre-plasmablastic stage is characterized by highly proliferative cells that start to secrete immunoglobulins (Igs). Thus, [...] Read more.
Plasma cells (PCs) have an essential role in humoral immune response by secretion of antibodies, and represent the final stage of B lymphocytes differentiation. During this differentiation, the pre-plasmablastic stage is characterized by highly proliferative cells that start to secrete immunoglobulins (Igs). Thus, replication and transcription must be tightly regulated in these cells to avoid transcription/replication conflicts (TRCs), which could increase replication stress and lead to genomic instability. In this review, we analyzed expression of genes involved in TRCs resolution during B to PC differentiation and identified 41 genes significantly overexpressed in the pre-plasmablastic stage. This illustrates the importance of mechanisms required for adequate processing of TRCs during PCs differentiation. Furthermore, we identified that several of these factors were also found overexpressed in purified PCs from patients with multiple myeloma (MM) compared to normal PCs. Malignant PCs produce high levels of Igs concomitantly with cell cycle deregulation. Therefore, increasing the TRCs occurring in MM cells could represent a potent therapeutic strategy for MM patients. Here, we describe the potential roles of TRCs resolution factors in myelomagenesis and discuss the therapeutic interest of targeting the TRCs resolution machinery in MM. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hematologic Malignancy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 1427 KB  
Review
Consequences and Resolution of Transcription–Replication Conflicts
by Maxime Lalonde, Manuel Trauner, Marcel Werner and Stephan Hamperl
Life 2021, 11(7), 637; https://doi.org/10.3390/life11070637 - 30 Jun 2021
Cited by 22 | Viewed by 6793
Abstract
Transcription–replication conflicts occur when the two critical cellular machineries responsible for gene expression and genome duplication collide with each other on the same genomic location. Although both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells have evolved multiple mechanisms to coordinate these processes on individual chromosomes, it [...] Read more.
Transcription–replication conflicts occur when the two critical cellular machineries responsible for gene expression and genome duplication collide with each other on the same genomic location. Although both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells have evolved multiple mechanisms to coordinate these processes on individual chromosomes, it is now clear that conflicts can arise due to aberrant transcription regulation and premature proliferation, leading to DNA replication stress and genomic instability. As both are considered hallmarks of aging and human diseases such as cancer, understanding the cellular consequences of conflicts is of paramount importance. In this article, we summarize our current knowledge on where and when collisions occur and how these encounters affect the genome and chromatin landscape of cells. Finally, we conclude with the different cellular pathways and multiple mechanisms that cells have put in place at conflict sites to ensure the resolution of conflicts and accurate genome duplication. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Transcription-Associated Genetic Instability)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop