Search Results (16)

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of for PODEYE TORIC intraocular lenses (IOL). Methods: This study was a retrospective, non-randomized, interventional case series. Inclusion criteria comprised diagnosis of an age-related cataract and a corneal astigmatism equal to or higher than 0.9 D and undergoing implantation of toric IOLs (TIOL). A single toric lens model (PodEye Toric, BVI) was used in all cases. Results: The study includes 51 eyes of 35 patients with TIOL implantation with a mean follow-up time of 45.7 (±36.5) days. Fourteen patients were targeted for mono-vision. Eight eyes had previously undergone refractive surgery (five post Myopic Lasik/PRK, two post RK/AK and one post RK). The mean postoperative adjusted spherical equivalent (SEQ) was −0.57 D ± 0.31 and the residual postoperative refractive astigmatism was −0.49 D ± 0.50. Only 2% of patients had a preoperative subjective astigmatism lower than 1.0 D whereas postoperatively, 94% of the patients had a residual astigmatism of 1.0 D or lower. The average deviation from the planned axis was 2.66 ± 0.26 degrees. None of the IOLs rotated to 10° or higher and 88% remained at 5° or less on the intended IOL axis. Twenty-six (63%) of IOL rotations were counterclockwise. Conclusions: PODEYE TORIC intraocular lenses provide exceptional refractive precision, reliable rotational stability, and consistently strong postoperative vision outcomes. Full article

Objective: To evaluate visual outcomes, rotational stability, patients’ satisfaction, and spectacle independence after bilateral Toric extended depth of focus intraocular lens (EDOF IOL) implantation. Methods: Prospective observational study including cataract patients with bilateral corneal astigmatism between 0.75 and 3.00 D implanted with Toric EDOF IOLs. After three months distance corrected and uncorrected visual acuity at 4 m (DCVA and UDVA), 80 cm (DCI80VA and UI80VA), 67 cm (DCI67VA and UI67VA), and 40 cm (DCNVA and UNVA), IOL stability by Toric IOL Assistant tool (Osiris T, CSO, Florence, Italy), binocular defocus curves, contrast sensitivity (CS), halometry, reading performance, and subjective and objective (Root mean square-RMS, modulation transfer function-MTF, cut-off and point-spread-function-PSF-Strehl ratio) visual quality were evaluated. Results: Forty eyes from 20 astigmatic patients were enrolled. Mean refractive spherical equivalent and residual cylinder were −0.21 ± 0.74 D and 0.29 ± 0.31 D, respectively. No patients needed additional surgery due to IOL rotation. Binocular UDVA, UI80VA, UI67VA, and UNVA ≤ 0.2 logMAR was found in 90%, 95%, 85%, and 80%. Distance-corrected visual outcomes have overall shown higher performances. All visual acuities at defocus curves were ≤0.125 logMAR between +0.50 D and −2.00 D. PSF-Strehl ratio, MTF cut-off, RMS were 0.26 ± 0.28, 19.82 ± 12.35, 0.31 ± 0.17. Reading analysis reached 125.42 ± 27.21 words/minute, 92.56 ± 7.82, 0.17 ± 0.15 logMAR and 0.50 ± 0.11 logRAD for mean reading speed, visual acuity score, reading acuity, and critical print size, respectively. CS was higher in photopic conditions. Subjective spectacle independence was achieved in 80% of patients. Conclusions: Toric EDOF IOL showed rotational stability and reliable astigmatic correction. It provided spectacle independence and good performance from distance to near distance, reaching high patient satisfaction without undermining binocular quality of vision. Full article

Background/Objectives: Phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation comprise a standard procedure for cataract treatment. However, minimal refractive error remains a determinant of postoperative results. Our study aimed to evaluate the refractive outcomes and the impact of the surgeon’s experience and the IOL model on Kosovan and Hungarian patients after cataract surgery. Methods: This study included the preoperative and postoperative data of 1417 patients scheduled to undergo cataract surgery with IOL implantation at two centers: the Ophthalmology Department of Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary, and the Ophthalmology Department of the University Clinical Center of Kosovo, Prishtina, Kosovo. STATA and SPSS were used for statistical analysis. Results: The data of 1001 Hungarian and 416 Kosovan patients were included in this study. There was a statistically significant difference between the groups in the 1-month postoperative best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) (p = 0.001); in the Hungarian patients, the 1-month BCDVA was 85.2%, while in the Kosovan patients, it was 49.6%. Of the 14 different IOLs implanted in the Hungarian patients, the AcrySof IQ toric SN6AT, FineVision HP (POD F GF), and 677MTY IOLs resulted in a statistically significant positive impact on the 1-month postoperative visual acuity (p < 0.05). The AcrySof SA60AT and Akreos ADAPT AO, implanted in the Kosovan patients, had a statistically significant positive impact on the 1-month postoperative visual acuity (p < 0.05). More extensive surgeon experience had a statistically significant positive impact on postoperative outcomes (p < 0.00). Conclusions: Multifocal and toric IOLs showed superiority in terms of postoperative outcomes in our study; therefore, we conclude that greater surgeon experience, the availability of premium IOLs, and appropriate IOL selection have a considerable impact on refractive outcomes after cataract surgery. Full article

Objectives: To compare intraocular lens (IOL) position and refractive outcomes between eyes that underwent sole phacoemulsification with those that underwent combined 25-gauge phacovitrectomy with a plate-haptic toric IOL implantation. Methods: This retrospective study included 60 eyes of 60 patients. Of these, 30 eyes underwent 25-gauge phacovitrectomy, while the other 30 eyes received phacoemulsification alone. In both groups, a plate-haptic toric intraocular lens (AT Torbi 709M, Carl Zeiss Meditec AG) was implanted. The main outcome measures were the refractive outcome, the refraction prediction error (PE), the difference in the postoperative anatomical lens position (ALP) change, and rotational stability. Results: The mean spherical equivalent decreased considerably from −2 ± 4.4 diopters (D) to −0.6 ± 1.4 D after phacovitrectomy (p = 0.05) and −0.7 D ± 5.5 D to −0.1 ± 1.1 D after phacoemulsification (p = 0.5). The prediction error (PE) was comparable between the two groups for all formulas (Haigis-T: p = 0.8, Barrett TK Toric: p = 0.8, Z CALC: p = 0.7). No significant difference in absolute ALP change and postoperative rotational stability was observed between the phacovitrectomy and phacoemulsification group (1.4 mm vs. 1.4 mm, p = 0.96; 2.9° vs. 2.1°, p = 0.5). Conclusions: The implantation of plate-haptic toric IOLs in the combined phacovitrectomy group resulted in refraction and IOL positioning outcomes comparable to those in the phacoemulsification-only group. Full article

Different techniques for artificial iris implantation with or without an intraocular lens, depending on lens status, are described in the literature. We describe a surgical technique for a custom-made artificial iris and toric-intraocular lens intrascleral flange fixation. We modified the “Backpack” artificial iris implantation surgical technique to facilitate an accurate alignment of the toric-intraocular lens in a patient with aphakia, aniridia, and high asymmetric astigmatism secondary to blunt trauma. Two months after the surgery, uncorrected visual acuity was 20/30, corrected to 20/25 with a refraction of −2.00 in the diopter sphere with no residual astigmatism. The artificial iris implant and toric-intraocular lens were well-centered. The patient was satisfied with the visual and cosmetic outcomes. This procedure, however, is not complication-free as our patient developed uveitis and increased intraocular pressure during the postoperative period, which was treated successfully. Full article

Purpose: To evaluate residual refractive astigmatism using the Panacea and enVista toric calculators, compared to the gold-standard Barrett toric calculator. Design: A retrospective and comparative study was conducted in one center. Methods: We reviewed the medical records of all patients with a diagnosis of senile cataracts and regular corneal astigmatism, without previous corneal or intraocular surgery, who underwent phacoemulsification with implantation of a toric intraocular lens, who had pre- and postoperative corneal topography, biometry, and refraction measurements. Results: The frequency of preoperative astigmatism according to the axis was 70 (84%) eyes showing with-the-rule (WTR) astigmatism, 9 (14%) eyes with against-the-rule (ATR) astigmatism, and 1 (2%) eye with oblique astigmatism. Regarding astigmatism prediction errors, there were statistically significant differences between the enVista and Panacea calculators (median of 0.39, 0.18, and 0.52 for Barrett, enVista, and Panacea, respectively). The residual astigmatism prediction error centroid was similar for the Barrett and enVista toric calculators, and both were lower compared to the Panacea calculator (x-component p < 0.001). Conclusions: The enVista toric calculator incorporating the Emmetropia Verifying Optical (EVO) toric calculator provides similar results to the gold-standard Barrett calculator. Full article

The incidence of both cataract and glaucoma is increasing globally. With increasing patient expectation and improved technology, premium intraocular lenses (IOLs), including presbyopia-correcting and toric IOLs, are being increasingly implanted today. However, concerns remain regarding the use of premium IOLs, particularly presbyopia-correcting IOLs, in eyes with glaucoma. This systematic review evaluates the use of premium IOLs in glaucoma. A comprehensive search of the MEDLINE database was performed from inception until 1 June 2023. Initial search yielded 1404 records, of which 12 were included in the final review of post-operative outcomes. Studies demonstrated high spectacle independence for distance and good patient satisfaction in glaucomatous eyes, with positive outcomes also in post-operative visual acuity, residual astigmatism, and contrast sensitivity. Considerations in patient selection include anatomical and functional factors, such as the type and severity of glaucomatous visual field defects, glaucoma subtype, presence of ocular surface disease, ocular changes after glaucoma surgery, and the reliability of disease monitoring, all of which may be affected by, or influence, the outcomes of premium IOL implantation in glaucoma patients. Regular reviews on this topic are needed in order to keep up with the rapid advancements in IOL technology and glaucoma surgical treatments. Full article

The outcomes of toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in correcting asymmetric bowtie corneal astigmatism remain uncertain. The accurate measurement of corneal astigmatism is essential for surgical planning. In this prospective cohort study, patients with asymmetric or symmetric bowtie corneal astigmatism who underwent toric IOL implantation were recruited. Preoperative corneal astigmatism was measured with an IOLMaster and Pentacam (including the simulated keratometry (SimK), total corneal refractive power (TCRP), and wavefront aberration (WFA) modes). At 3 months after surgery, the refractive outcomes and residual astigmatic refractive errors were compared with patients with symmetric bowtie astigmatism. The prediction errors (the differences between the calculated actual corneal astigmatism and the measured corneal astigmatism) were compared among the different measurement modes in the asymmetric group. There were no differences in residual astigmatism between the asymmetric and symmetric groups. However, the mean absolute residual astigmatic refractive error was greater in the asymmetric group than in the symmetric group (0.72 ± 0.42 D vs. 0.53 ± 0.24 D, p = 0.043). In the asymmetric group, the mean absolute prediction errors for the IOLMaster, SimK, TCRP and WFA modes were 0.53 ± 0.40, 0.56 ± 0.47, 0.68 ± 0.52, and 0.43 ± 0.40 D, respectively. The Pentacam WFA mode was the most accurate mode (p < 0.05). The absolute prediction error of the WFA mode was positively correlated with the total corneal irregular astigmatism higher-order aberrations and coma (r = 0.416 and r = 0.473, respectively; both p < 0.05). Our study suggests toric IOL implantation effectively corrected asymmetric bowtie corneal astigmatism. The Pentacam WFA mode may be the most accurate measurement mode, although its accuracy decreased as asymmetry increased. Full article

The purpose of this review is to evaluate the prediction of postoperative residual astigmatism and to determine the best prediction method for astigmatism correction. In recent findings for residual astigmatism in non-toric monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) implanted eyes, vector analysis can be used to correctly evaluate residual astigmatism by decomposing it. In predicting residual astigmatism, the with-the-rule (WTR) and against-the-rule (ATR) astigmatism components can now be almost predicted. This may be due to advances in inspection equipment and surgical technique. However, there are still issues with the oblique astigmatism component. In addition, corneal astigmatism is the most important predictor of postoperative residual astigmatism, and other predictors, such as refractive astigmatism, age, and lens thickness, have also been mentioned. However, all but corneal astigmatism are questionable because of the possibility of confounding variables. Total corneal astigmatism is more accurate in predicting residual astigmatism than anterior corneal astigmatism. Several predictions of residual astigmatism have been reported, but complete prediction has not been possible. Further research is needed, especially in predicting oblique astigmatism. However, I emphasize that the accuracy of predicting WTR and ATR astigmatism has improved considerably and can be predicted using regression equations with total corneal astigmatism. Full article

(1) Background: To compare the results of a new intraoperative contactless device (INTEGRA Optomed, Poland) with the result of a manual method for determining the axis for toric intraocular lens implantation. (2) Material and Methods: This retrospective observational study included 60 eyes of 40 patients (17 men, 23 women) who had toric intraocular lenses implanted. A video recording of each surgery that used the INTEGRA system was made for the analysis. Two researchers then independently assessed the location of the implant axes determined with both digital and manual slit-lamp methods, and compared the results between methods. (3) Results: The implantation axes suggested through the manual and INTEGRA methods were similar. The median axis disparities were 0.0 degrees for both groups. The standard deviation was 0.63 and 0.75 for researcher 1 and 2, respectively. The dominant value was 0.0 in both groups. The INTEGRA axis designation was statistically significantly different from the manual method for researcher 1 (p < 0.05), but it was statistically insignificant for researcher 2 (p = 0.79). (4) Conclusions: The INTEGRA system is a digital ink-free device for image tracking scleral vessels. It was helpful for determining the implantation axis in a precise manner, and the measurements were comparable with those obtained through a manual technique. Full article

The current investigation evaluates the efficiency of the trifocal toric Liberty 677MTY intraocular lens (IOL) in correcting preoperative corneal astigmatism in cataract patients demanding spectacle independence. The retrospective evaluation included 28 eyes of 15 patients with preoperative corneal astigmatism of at least 1.0 Dioptre (D). All patients were followed up for one year postoperatively. Residual refractive errors and visual acuities at multiple distances were measured. Binocular visual acuity and contrast sensitivity defocus curves were plotted. Visual functions and patient satisfaction were assessed. The efficiency of astigmatism correction was determined using the vector analysis method. The mean spherical equivalent refraction (SEQ) improved from 2.72 ± 1.62 D to 0.10 ± 0.48 D. The cylindric refraction decreased from 1.18 ± 0.45 D to 0.16 ± 0.31 D. Vector analysis proved efficient astigmatism correction with a centroid of 0.10 ± 0.34 D at 161°. Ninety-two percent of eyes resulted within 0.5 D from the target refraction. Visual acuities were 0.1 logMAR or better from +1.0 to −3.5 D defocus values. Visual tasks could be performed without major difficulties. Our patients were highly satisfied. Refractive and visual outcomes with the investigated presbyopia-correcting toric IOL are predictable and the lens provides excellent trifocal vision. Full article

Background: To determine whether there is a significant saving of time when using a digital cataract workflow for digital data transfer compared to a manual approach of biometry assessment, data export, intraocular lens calculation, and surgery time. Methods: In total, 48 eyes of 24 patients were divided into two groups: 24 eyes were evaluated using a manual approach, whereas another 24 eyes underwent a full digital lens surgery workflow. The primary variables for comparison between both groups were the overall time as well as several time steps starting at optical biometry acquisition until the end of the surgical lens implantation. Other outcomes, such as toric intraocular lens misalignment, reduction of cylinder, surgically induced astigmatism, prediction error, and distance visual acuity were measured. Results: Overall, the total diagnostic and surgical time was reduced from 1364.1 ± 202.6 s in the manual group to 1125.8 ± 183.2 s in the digital group (p < 0.001). The complete time of surgery declined from 756.5 ± 82.3 s to 667.3 ± 56.3 (p < 0.0005). Compared to the manual approach of biometric data export and intraocular lens calculation (76.7 ± 12.3 s) as well as the manual export of the reference image to a portable external storage device (26.8 ± 5.5 s), a highly significant saving of time was achieved (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Using a software-based digital approach to toric intraocular lens implantation is convenient, more efficient, and thus more economical than a manual workflow in surgery practice. Full article

Background: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the refractive outcomes of non-toric and toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) in keratoconus (KC) using different IOL power calculation formulas. Methods: A systematic search was conducted to identify studies that report on refractive outcomes of different IOL power calculation formulas in KC patients undergoing cataract surgery. Inclusion criteria were primary posterior chamber non-toric and toric monofocal intraocular lens implantation, data on the degree of KC, explicit mention of the formula used for each stage of KC, and the number of eyes in each category. We calculated and compared the absolute and mean prediction errors, percentage of eyes within 0.5 D and 1 D from target, and the weighted absolute prediction errors of IOL formulas, all were given for KC degrees I–III. Results: The bibliographic search yielded 582 studies published between 1996 and 2020, 14 of which (in total 456 eyes) met the criteria: three studies on non-toric IOL (98 eyes), eight studies on toric IOLs (98 eyes) and three studies of unknown separation between non-toric and toric IOLs (260 eyes). The lowest absolute prediction error (APE) for mild, moderate, and advanced KC was seen with Kane’s IOL power formula with keratoconus adjustment. The APE for the top five IOL power formulas ranged 0.49–0.73 diopters (D) for mild (83–94%) of eyes within 1 D from the target), 1.08–1.21 D for moderate (51–57% within 1 D), and 1.44–2.86 D for advanced KC (12–48% within 1 D). Conclusions: Cataract surgery in eyes with mild-to-moderate KC generally achieves satisfactory postoperative refractive results. In patients with advanced KC, a minority of the eyes achieved spherical equivalent refraction within 1 D from the target. The Kane’s formula with keratoconus adjustment showed the best results in all KC stages. Full article

Smartphone apps are becoming increasingly popular in ophthalmology, one specific area of their application being toric intraocular lens (IOL) surgery for astigmatism correction. Our objective was to identify, review and objectively score smartphone apps applicable to toric IOL calculation and/or axis alignment. This review was divided into three phases. A review was conducted on four major app databases (phase I): National Health Service (NHS) Apps Library, Google Play Store, Apple App Store and Amazon Appstore. A systematic literature review (phase II) was conducted to identify studies for included apps in phase I of our study. Keywords used in both searches included: “toric lens”, “toric IOL”, “refraction”, “astigmatism”, “ophthalmology”, “eye calculator”, “ophthalmology calculator” and “refractive calculator”. Included apps were objectively scored (phase III) by three independent reviewers using the mobile app rating scale (MARS), a validated tool that ranks the quality of mobile health apps using a calculated mean app quality (MAQ) score. Phase I of our study screened 2428 smartphone apps, of which six apps for toric IOL calculation and four apps for axis marking were eligible and were selected for quantitative analysis. Phase II of our study screened 477 studies from PubMed, Medline and Google Scholar. Three studies validating two apps (toriCAM, iToric Patwardhan) in a clinical setting as adjunct tools for preoperative axis marking were identified. Phase III ranked Toric Calculator for iPhone (Apple iOS, MAQ 4.13; average MAQ 3.34 ± 0.54) as the highest-scoring toric IOL calculator, and iToric Patwardhan (Android OS, MAQ 4.13; average MAQ 3.41 ± 0.44) was the highest-scoring axis marker in our study. Our review identified and objectively scored ten smartphone apps available for toric IOL surgery adjuncts. Toric Calculator for iPhone and iToric Patwardhan were the highest-scoring toric IOL calculator and axis marker, respectively. Current literature, though limited, suggests that axis marking smartphone apps can achieve similar levels of misalignment reduction when compared to digital systems. Full article

To evaluate the prediction error (PE) obtained in Phacoemulsification (Phaco) or Femtosecond (Femto) surgeries without considering posterior corneal astigmatism correction (non-PCA) versus the correction based on Abulafia-Koch + Medicontur (AK) and Barrett calculators in toric intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation. 58 right eyes were retrospectively retrieved from our database. Two groups formed by 28 and 30 eyes depending on the surgery type, Phaco or Femto respectively, were defined. Astigmatism PE were evaluated considering the approach used for calculation of the implanted IOL power (AK) versus the estimation of PEs in non-PCA and Barrett formula. A doubly-multivariate analysis was conducted to assess the differences between-surgery types, within-methods of calculation, and interaction. Mean centroid PE was significantly different between non-PCA, AK and Barrett approaches (p < 0.0005), and neither differences (p < 0.239) nor interaction (p = 0.672) between Phaco or Femto were found. Post-hoc univariate analysis showed a higher PE for the x-component of the non-PCA method versus AK (0.15 D, p < 0.0005) and non-PCA versus Barrett (0.18 D, p < 0.0005), though no differences were found between AK and Barrett (0.03 D, p = 0.93). Against-the-rule under-correction and with-the-rule overcorrection were found in both arms when PCA was not considered. Both calculators provide comparable clinical results. Full article