Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (15)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = the International Consensus Classification (2022 ICC)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
10 pages, 228 KB  
Review
A Review of the Latest Updates in Cytogenetic and Molecular Classification and Emerging Approaches in Identifying Abnormalities in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
by Chaimae El Mahdaoui, Hind Dehbi and Siham Cherkaoui
Lymphatics 2025, 3(3), 23; https://doi.org/10.3390/lymphatics3030023 - 5 Aug 2025
Viewed by 977
Abstract
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a heterogeneous hematologic malignancy defined by the uncontrolled proliferation of lymphoid precursors. Accurate diagnosis and effective therapeutic strategies hinge on a comprehensive understanding of the genetic and molecular landscape of ALL. This review synthesizes the latest updates in [...] Read more.
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a heterogeneous hematologic malignancy defined by the uncontrolled proliferation of lymphoid precursors. Accurate diagnosis and effective therapeutic strategies hinge on a comprehensive understanding of the genetic and molecular landscape of ALL. This review synthesizes the latest updates in cytogenetic and molecular classifications, emphasizing the 2022 World Health Organization (WHO) and International Consensus Classification (ICC) revisions. Key chromosomal alterations such as BCR::ABL1 and ETV6::RUNX1 and emerging subtypes including Ph-like ALL, DUX4, and MEF2D rearrangements are examined for their prognostic significance. Furthermore, we assess novel diagnostic tools, notably next-generation sequencing (NGS) and optical genome mapping (OGM). While NGS excels at identifying point mutations and small indels, OGM offers high-resolution structural variant detection with 100% sensitivity in multiple validation studies. These advancements enhance our grasp of leukemogenesis and pave the way for precision medicine in both B- and T-cell ALL. Ultimately, integrating these innovations into routine diagnostics is crucial for personalized patient management and improving clinical outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL))
25 pages, 15916 KB  
Review
Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Diagnosis and Evaluation by Flow Cytometry
by Feras Ally and Xueyan Chen
Cancers 2024, 16(22), 3855; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16223855 - 17 Nov 2024
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 10207
Abstract
With recent technological advances and significant progress in understanding the pathogenesis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), the updated fifth edition WHO Classification (WHO-HAEM5) and the newly introduced International Consensus Classification (ICC), as well as the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommendations in 2022, require the [...] Read more.
With recent technological advances and significant progress in understanding the pathogenesis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), the updated fifth edition WHO Classification (WHO-HAEM5) and the newly introduced International Consensus Classification (ICC), as well as the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommendations in 2022, require the integration of immunophenotypic, cytogenetic, and molecular data, alongside clinical and morphologic findings, for accurate diagnosis, prognostication, and guiding therapeutic strategies in AML. Flow cytometry offers rapid and sensitive immunophenotyping through a multiparametric approach and is a pivotal laboratory tool for the classification of AML, identification of therapeutic targets, and monitoring of measurable residual disease (MRD) post therapy. The association of immunophenotypic features and recurrent genetic abnormalities has been recognized and applied in informing further diagnostic evaluation and immediate therapeutic decision-making. Recently, the evolving role of machine learning models in assisting flow cytometric data analysis for the automated diagnosis and prediction of underlying genetic alterations has been illustrated. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Flow Cytometry of Hematological Malignancies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

30 pages, 24413 KB  
Conference Report
Lymphadenitis/Reactive-Hyperplasia, Mimickers of Lymphomas, Low-Grade B-Cell Lymphomas, and Hodgkin Lymphoma
by A. Nicolae, E. Sabattini, M. Ponzoni, M. Paulli, M. Lucioni, T. Salviato and A. Carbone
Hemato 2024, 5(3), 350-379; https://doi.org/10.3390/hemato5030026 - 20 Sep 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 7186
Abstract
A two-day meeting on controversial topics in hematopathology was held in Bologna, Italy, on 19–20 January 2024. The meeting primarily targeted pathologists lacking experience in hematological neoplasms and pathologists in training. The course aimed to highlight practical diagnostic challenges faced by pathologists and [...] Read more.
A two-day meeting on controversial topics in hematopathology was held in Bologna, Italy, on 19–20 January 2024. The meeting primarily targeted pathologists lacking experience in hematological neoplasms and pathologists in training. The course aimed to highlight practical diagnostic challenges faced by pathologists and discuss solutions through the application of conventional histology, along with appropriate immunohistological, genetic, and molecular findings. The teaching program included lectures and slide seminars presented by a team of expert hematopathologists who were co-authors of the WHO classification of hematolymphoid tumors. Special interest revolved around “lymphadenitis and lymphoma mimickers”, “a rational approach to low-grade B-cell lymphomas”, and “advancements in defining Hodgkin lymphoma”. A key aspect emphasized by the faculty team was the use of the fifth edition of the WHO Bluebook and the International Consensus Classification (ICC 2022) of lymphomas. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Lymphomas)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 890 KB  
Review
Comparative Analysis of AML Classification Systems: Evaluating the WHO, ICC, and ELN Frameworks and Their Distinctions
by Huda Salman
Cancers 2024, 16(16), 2915; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16162915 - 22 Aug 2024
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 6419
Abstract
Comprehensive analyses of the molecular heterogeneity of acute myelogenous leukemia, AML, particularly when malignant cells retain normal karyotype, has significantly evolved. In 2022, significant revisions were introduced in the World Health Organization (WHO) classification and the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2022 guidelines of acute [...] Read more.
Comprehensive analyses of the molecular heterogeneity of acute myelogenous leukemia, AML, particularly when malignant cells retain normal karyotype, has significantly evolved. In 2022, significant revisions were introduced in the World Health Organization (WHO) classification and the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2022 guidelines of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). These revisions coincided with the inception of the first version of the International Consensus Classification (ICC) for AML. These modifications aim to improve diagnosis and treatment outcomes via a comprehensive incorporation of sophisticated genetic and clinical parameters as well as facilitate accruals to innovative clinical trials. Key updates include modifications to the blast count criteria for AML diagnosis, with WHO 2022 eliminating the ≥20% blast requirement in the presence of AML-defining abnormalities and ICC 2022 setting a 10% cutoff for recurrent genetic abnormalities. Additionally, new categories, such as AML with mutated TP53 and MDS/AML, were introduced. ELN 2022 guidelines retained risk stratification approach and emphasized the critical role of measurable residual disease (MRD) that increased the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) and flow cytometry testing. These revisions underscore the importance of precise classification for targeted treatment strategies and improved patient outcomes. How much difference versus concordance these classifications present and the impact of those on clinical practice is a continuing discussion. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML))
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 234 KB  
Article
WHO/ICC Classification for Myelodysplastic Neoplasms/Syndromes Performs Better for Subtype Cytomorphological Diagnosis?
by Ana Isabel Vicente, Irene Luna, Juan Carlos Ruiz, María José Remigia, Andrés Jerez, Rafael Lluch, Inmaculada Llopis, María Josefa Marco, Carmen Benet, Carmen Alonso, María Dolores Linares, Luis Serrano, María Teresa Orero, Francisco José Ortuño and María Leonor Senent
Diagnostics 2024, 14(15), 1631; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14151631 - 29 Jul 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2599
Abstract
The International Consensus Classification of Myeloid Neoplasms and Acute Leukemias (ICC) and the 5th edition of the WHO classification (WHO 2022) have refined the diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Both classifications segregate MDS subtypes based on molecular or cytogenetic findings but rely on [...] Read more.
The International Consensus Classification of Myeloid Neoplasms and Acute Leukemias (ICC) and the 5th edition of the WHO classification (WHO 2022) have refined the diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Both classifications segregate MDS subtypes based on molecular or cytogenetic findings but rely on the subjective assessment of blast cell percentage and dysplasia in hematopoietic cell lineages. This study aimed to evaluate interobserver concordance among 13 cytomorphologists from eight hospitals in assessing blast percentages and dysplastic features in 44 MDS patients. The study found fair interobserver agreement for the PB blast percentage and moderate agreement for the BM blast percentage, with the best concordance in cases with <5% BM blasts and >10% BM blasts. Monocyte count agreement was fair, and dysplasia assessment showed moderate concordance for megakaryocytic lineage but lower concordance for erythroid and granulocytic lineages. Overall, interobserver concordance for MDS subtypes was moderate across all classifications, with slightly better results for WHO 2022. These findings highlight the ongoing need for morphological evaluation in MDS diagnosis despite advances in genetic and molecular techniques. The study supports the blast percentage ranges established by the ICC but suggests refining BM blast cutoffs. Given the moderate interobserver concordance, a unified classification approach for MDS is recommended. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis, Prognosis and Management of Hematologic Malignancies)
11 pages, 671 KB  
Review
A Brief Overview of the Molecular Landscape of Myelodysplastic Neoplasms
by Rami Abdulbaki and Sheeja T. Pullarkat
Curr. Oncol. 2024, 31(5), 2353-2363; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31050175 - 23 Apr 2024
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3500
Abstract
Myelodysplastic neoplasm (MDS) is a heterogeneous group of clonal hematological disorders that originate from the hematopoietic and progenitor cells and present with cytopenias and morphologic dysplasia with a propensity to progress to bone marrow failure or acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Genetic evolution plays [...] Read more.
Myelodysplastic neoplasm (MDS) is a heterogeneous group of clonal hematological disorders that originate from the hematopoietic and progenitor cells and present with cytopenias and morphologic dysplasia with a propensity to progress to bone marrow failure or acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Genetic evolution plays a critical role in the pathogenesis, progression, and clinical outcomes of MDS. This process involves the acquisition of genetic mutations in stem cells that confer a selective growth advantage, leading to clonal expansion and the eventual development of MDS. With the advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) assays, an increasing number of molecular aberrations have been discovered in recent years. The knowledge of molecular events in MDS has led to an improved understanding of the disease process, including the evolution of the disease and prognosis, and has paved the way for targeted therapy. The 2022 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification and the International Consensus Classification (ICC) have incorporated the molecular signature into the classification system for MDS. In addition, specific germline mutations are associated with MDS development, especially in pediatrics and young adults. This article reviews the genetic abnormalities of MDS in adults with a brief review of germline predisposition syndromes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Molecular Pathology of Myelodysplastic Syndromes)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 339 KB  
Review
Myelodysplastic Neoplasms (MDS): The Current and Future Treatment Landscape
by Daniel Karel, Claire Valburg, Navitha Woddor, Victor E. Nava and Anita Aggarwal
Curr. Oncol. 2024, 31(4), 1971-1993; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31040148 - 3 Apr 2024
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 8899
Abstract
Myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) are a heterogenous clonal disorder of hemopoietic stem cells characterized by cytomorphologic dysplasia, ineffective hematopoiesis, peripheral cytopenias and risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Our understanding of this disease has continued to evolve over the last century. More [...] Read more.
Myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) are a heterogenous clonal disorder of hemopoietic stem cells characterized by cytomorphologic dysplasia, ineffective hematopoiesis, peripheral cytopenias and risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Our understanding of this disease has continued to evolve over the last century. More recently, prognostication and treatment have been determined by cytogenetic and molecular data. Specific genetic abnormalities, such as deletion of the long arm of chromosome 5 (del(5q)), TP53 inactivation and SF3B1 mutation, are increasingly associated with disease phenotype and outcome, as reflected in the recently updated fifth edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Hematolymphoid Tumors (WHO5) and the International Consensus Classification 2022 (ICC 2022) classification systems. Treatment of lower-risk MDS is primarily symptom directed to ameliorate cytopenias. Higher-risk disease warrants disease-directed therapy at diagnosis; however, the only possible cure is an allogenic bone marrow transplant. Novel treatments aimed at rational molecular and cellular pathway targets have yielded a number of candidate drugs over recent years; however few new approvals have been granted. With ongoing research, we hope to increasingly offer our MDS patients tailored therapeutic approaches, ultimately decreasing morbidity and mortality. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Hematology)
12 pages, 788 KB  
Article
Myelodysplastic Neoplasms (MDS) with Ring Sideroblasts or SF3B1 Mutations: The Improved Clinical Utility of World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification 2022 Definitions, a Single-Centre Retrospective Chart Review
by Shamim Mortuza, Benjamin Chin-Yee, Tyler E. James, Ian H. Chin-Yee, Benjamin D. Hedley, Jenny M. Ho, Lalit Saini, Alejandro Lazo-Langner, Laila Schenkel, Pratibha Bhai, Bekim Sadikovic, Jonathan Keow, Nikhil Sangle and Cyrus C. Hsia
Curr. Oncol. 2024, 31(4), 1762-1773; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31040134 - 29 Mar 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3200
Abstract
Myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) with ring sideroblasts (RS) are diagnosed via bone marrow aspiration in the presence of either (i) ≥15% RS or (ii) 5–14% RS and an SF3B1 mutation. In the MEDALIST trial and in an interim analysis of the COMMANDS trial, lower-risk [...] Read more.
Myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) with ring sideroblasts (RS) are diagnosed via bone marrow aspiration in the presence of either (i) ≥15% RS or (ii) 5–14% RS and an SF3B1 mutation. In the MEDALIST trial and in an interim analysis of the COMMANDS trial, lower-risk MDS-RS patients had decreased transfusion dependency with luspatercept treatment. A total of 6817 patients with suspected hematologic malignancies underwent molecular testing using a next-generation-sequencing-based genetic assay and 395 MDS patients, seen at our centre from 1 January 2018 to 31 May 2023, were reviewed. Of these, we identified 39 evaluable patients as having lower-risk MDS with SF3B1 mutations: there were 20 (51.3%) males and 19 (48.7%) females, with a median age of 77 years (range of 57 to 92). Nineteen (48.7%) patients had an isolated SF3B1 mutation with a mean variant allele frequency of 35.2% +/− 8.1%, ranging from 7.4% to 46.0%. There were 29 (74.4%) patients with ≥15% RS, 6 (15.4%) with 5 to 14% RS, one (2.6%) with 1% RS, and 3 (7.7%) with no RS. Our study suggests that a quarter of patients would be missed based on the morphologic criterion of only using RS greater than 15% and supports the revised 2022 definitions of the World Health Organization (WHO) and International Consensus Classification (ICC), which shift toward molecularly defined subtypes of MDS and appropriate testing. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Molecular Pathology of Myelodysplastic Syndromes)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 5862 KB  
Review
Review and Updates on Systemic Mastocytosis and Related Entities
by Julie Y. Li, Christopher B. Ryder, Hailing Zhang, Samuel G. Cockey, Elizabeth Hyjek, Lynn C. Moscinski, Elizabeth Sagatys and Jinming Song
Cancers 2023, 15(23), 5626; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15235626 - 28 Nov 2023
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 5797
Abstract
Mast cell disorders range from benign proliferations to systemic diseases that cause anaphylaxis and other diverse symptoms to mast cell neoplasms with varied clinical outcomes. Mastocytosis is the pathologic process of the accumulation of abnormal mast cells in different organs, mostly driven by [...] Read more.
Mast cell disorders range from benign proliferations to systemic diseases that cause anaphylaxis and other diverse symptoms to mast cell neoplasms with varied clinical outcomes. Mastocytosis is the pathologic process of the accumulation of abnormal mast cells in different organs, mostly driven by KIT mutations, and can present as cutaneous mastocytosis, systemic mastocytosis (SM), and mast cell sarcoma. The WHO 5th edition classification divides systemic mastocytosis into bone marrow mastocytosis, indolent systemic mastocytosis, smoldering systemic mastocytosis, aggressive systemic mastocytosis, systemic mastocytosis with an associated hematologic neoplasm, and mast cell leukemia. The new ICC classifies SM slightly differently. The diagnosis of SM requires the integration of bone marrow morphologic, immunophenotypic, and molecular findings, as well as clinical signs and symptoms. Moreover, understanding the wide range of clinical presentations for patients with mast cell disorders is necessary for accurate and timely diagnosis. This review provides an updated overview of mast cell disorders, with a special emphasis on SM, including the latest approaches to diagnosis, prognostic stratification, and management of this rare disease. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2411 KB  
Review
A Review of Childhood Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Diagnosis and Novel Treatment
by Serena Tseng, Mu-En Lee and Pei-Chin Lin
Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16(11), 1614; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16111614 - 15 Nov 2023
Cited by 17 | Viewed by 6147
Abstract
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the second most common hematologic malignancy in children. The incidence of childhood AML is much lower than acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), which makes childhood AML a rare disease in children. The role of genetic abnormalities in AML classification, [...] Read more.
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the second most common hematologic malignancy in children. The incidence of childhood AML is much lower than acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), which makes childhood AML a rare disease in children. The role of genetic abnormalities in AML classification, management, and prognosis prediction is much more important than before. Disease classifications and risk group classifications, such as the WHO classification, the international consensus classification (ICC), and the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) classification, were revised in 2022. The application of the new information in childhood AML will be upcoming in the next few years. The frequency of each genetic abnormality in adult and childhood AML is different; therefore, in this review, we emphasize well-known genetic subtypes in childhood AML, including core-binding factor AML (CBF AML), KMT2Ar (KMT2A/11q23 rearrangement) AML, normal karyotype AML with somatic mutations, unbalanced cytogenetic abnormalities AML, NUP98 11p15/NUP09 rearrangement AML, and acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). Current risk group classification, the management algorithm in childhood AML, and novel treatment modalities such as targeted therapy, immune therapy, and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy are reviewed. Finally, the indications of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in AML are discussed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pharmacology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 318 KB  
Review
A Comparison of the Fifth World Health Organization and the International Consensus Classifications of Mature T-Cell Lymphomas
by Pier Paolo Piccaluga and Shaimaa S. Khattab
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(18), 14170; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241814170 - 16 Sep 2023
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3504
Abstract
Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) are a rare subset of non-Hodgkin lymphomas that often carry significant difficulty in diagnosis and classification because of their rarity and biological complexity. Previous editions of the World Health Organization (WHO) classifications of hemopoietic neoplasms in 2001, 2008, and [...] Read more.
Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) are a rare subset of non-Hodgkin lymphomas that often carry significant difficulty in diagnosis and classification because of their rarity and biological complexity. Previous editions of the World Health Organization (WHO) classifications of hemopoietic neoplasms in 2001, 2008, and 2017 aimed to standardize hemopoietic neoplasm diagnosis in general. Since then, crucial clinico-pathological, immunophenotypic, and recent molecular discoveries have been made in the field of lymphomas, contributing to refining diagnostic criteria of several diseases, upgrading entities previously defined as provisional, and identifying new entities. In 2022, two different models were proposed to classify hematolymphoid neoplasms: the 5th edition of the WHO classification (WHO-HAEM5) and the International Consensus Classification (ICC). Of note, a common nosography is mandatory to ensure progress in health science and ensure the basis for a real precision medicine. In this article, the authors summarized the main differences with the previous fourth WHO edition and reviewed the main discrepancies between the two newest classifications, as far as PTCLs are concerned. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Pathogenesis and Treatment of Cell Lymphomas)
24 pages, 859 KB  
Review
Definitions, Biology, and Current Therapeutic Landscape of Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
by Margo B. Gerke, Ilias Christodoulou and Theodoros Karantanos
Cancers 2023, 15(15), 3815; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15153815 - 27 Jul 2023
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 5123
Abstract
Myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN) are hematological disorders characterized by both proliferative and dysplastic features. According to the 2022 International Consensus Classification (ICC), MDS/MPN consists of clonal monocytosis of undetermined significance (CMUS), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML), MDS/MPN with SF3B1 mutation [...] Read more.
Myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN) are hematological disorders characterized by both proliferative and dysplastic features. According to the 2022 International Consensus Classification (ICC), MDS/MPN consists of clonal monocytosis of undetermined significance (CMUS), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML), MDS/MPN with SF3B1 mutation (MDS/MPN-T-SF3B1), MDS/MPN with ring sideroblasts and thrombocytosis not otherwise specified (MDS/MPN-RS-T-NOS), and MDS/MPN-NOS. These disorders exhibit a diverse range of genetic alterations involving various transcription factors (e.g., RUNX1), signaling molecules (e.g., NRAS, JAK2), splicing factors (e.g., SF3B, SRSF2), and epigenetic regulators (e.g., TET2, ASXL1, DNMT3A), as well as specific cytogenetic abnormalities (e.g., 8 trisomies, 7 deletions/monosomies). Clinical studies exploring therapeutic options for higher-risk MDS/MPN overlap syndromes mostly involve hypomethylating agents, but other treatments such as lenalidomide and targeted agents such as JAK inhibitors and inhibitors targeting PARP, histone deacetylases, and the Ras pathway are under investigation. While these treatment modalities can provide partial disease control, allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (allo-BMT) is the only potentially curative option for patients. Important prognostic factors correlating with outcomes after allo-BMT include comorbidities, splenomegaly, karyotype alterations, and the bone marrow blasts percentage at the time of transplantation. Future research is imperative to optimizing therapeutic strategies and enhancing patient outcomes in MDS/MPN neoplasms. In this review, we summarize MDS/MPN diagnostic criteria, biology, and current and future treatment options, including bone marrow transplantation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1875 KB  
Review
Myelodysplastic Syndromes/Myeloproliferative Overlap Neoplasms and Differential Diagnosis in the WHO and ICC 2022 Era: A Focused Review
by Diletta Fontana, Elena M. Elli, Fabio Pagni and Rocco Piazza
Cancers 2023, 15(12), 3175; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15123175 - 13 Jun 2023
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 5939
Abstract
The myelodysplastic syndromes/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN) category comprises a varied group of myeloid neoplastic diseases characterized by clinical and pathologic overlapping features of both myelodysplastic and myeloproliferative neoplasms. For these reasons, these tumors are challenging in terms of diagnosis. The recent World Health Organization [...] Read more.
The myelodysplastic syndromes/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN) category comprises a varied group of myeloid neoplastic diseases characterized by clinical and pathologic overlapping features of both myelodysplastic and myeloproliferative neoplasms. For these reasons, these tumors are challenging in terms of diagnosis. The recent World Health Organization (WHO) 2022 classification and the International Consensus Classification (ICC) made changes in the classification of MDS/MPN compared to the previous 2016 WHO classification and improved the diagnostic criteria of these entities. The aim of this review is to describe the main entities reported in the more recent classifications, focusing on chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), MDS/MPN with neutrophilia (or atypical CML [aCML]), and MDS/MPN with SF3B1 mutation and thrombocytosis/MDS/MPN with ring sideroblasts and thrombocytosis. A particular emphasis is given to the differential diagnosis and analysis of subtle divergences and semantic differences between the WHO classification and the ICC for these entities. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Genetics and Treatment of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 1955 KB  
Perspective
What’s New in the Classification, Diagnosis and Therapy of Myeloid Leukemias
by Marco Pizzi, Carmela Gurrieri and Attilio Orazi
Hemato 2023, 4(2), 112-134; https://doi.org/10.3390/hemato4020011 - 29 Mar 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 22892
Abstract
Myeloid leukemias are a broad group of hematological disorders, characterized by heterogeneous clinical and biological features. In recent years, unprecedented genetic discoveries and clinical–biological correlations have revolutionized the field of myeloid leukemias. The most relevant changes have specifically occurred in acute myeloid leukemia [...] Read more.
Myeloid leukemias are a broad group of hematological disorders, characterized by heterogeneous clinical and biological features. In recent years, unprecedented genetic discoveries and clinical–biological correlations have revolutionized the field of myeloid leukemias. The most relevant changes have specifically occurred in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and myeloid neoplasms (MNs) with eosinophilia. The recently published International Consensus Classification (ICC) of myeloid neoplasms has addressed these changes, providing an updated framework and revised diagnostic criteria for such entities. This is also the aim of the 5th edition of the WHO classification of hematopoietic tumors, whose preliminary version was published in 2022. Parallel to this, new therapeutic options and novel molecular targets have changed the management of many myeloid entities, including AML and CML. This review aims to address the most relevant updates in the classification and diagnosis of AML, CMML, CML and MNs with eosinophilia. The state of the art of treatment and future therapeutic options for such disorders are also discussed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Leukemias)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 15935 KB  
Review
Mast Cell Leukemia: An Update with a Practical Review
by Magda Zanelli, Martina Quintini, Salvatore Magnasco, Lara Aprile, Andrea Palicelli, Maurizio Zizzo, Francesca Sanguedolce, Stefano Ricci, Saverio Pancetti, Valeria Zuccalà, Veronica Martino, Giuseppe Broggi, Rosario Caltabiano, Alberto Cavazza, Paola Parente, Cristina Mecucci, Giovanni Martino and Stefano Ascani
Cancers 2023, 15(6), 1664; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15061664 - 8 Mar 2023
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 4318
Abstract
Mast cell leukemia (MCL) is the leukemic form of SM with at least 20% mostly immature mast cells on bone marrow aspirate. MCL may develop de novo, in the absence of a prior SM, or it may represent a progression from a previous [...] Read more.
Mast cell leukemia (MCL) is the leukemic form of SM with at least 20% mostly immature mast cells on bone marrow aspirate. MCL may develop de novo, in the absence of a prior SM, or it may represent a progression from a previous SM. MCL may be sub-divided into the more frequent, aggressive acute form with signs of organ damage (C-findings) and the chronic form lacking C-findings and presenting a more stable course, although over time, progression to acute MCL is common. The 2022 WHO subtype of MCL with an associated hematological neoplasm was renamed MCL with an associated myeloid neoplasm in the 2022 International Consensus Classification (ICC). The relevance of the distinction between the leukemic and aleukemic forms based on the percentage of circulating mast cells is a matter of debate. The current knowledge on MCL is restricted mainly to single reports or case series with a limited number of larger studies. Our aim is to provide a comprehensive overview of this rare disease in terms of clinical manifestations, morphology, phenotype, molecular characteristics, differential diagnosis, outcome and treatment. A general overview on mastocytosis is also included. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Lymphoma, Plasma Cell Myeloma, and Leukemia Diagnostics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop