Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (1,624)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = supportive cancer care

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
36 pages, 1589 KB  
Systematic Review
Technology-Enabled (P)rehabilitation for Patients Undergoing Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Tiffany R. Tsoukalas, Zirong Bai, Claire Jeon, Roy Huynh, Eva Gu, Kate Alexander, Paula R. Beckenkamp, Adrian Boscolo, Kilian Brown, Phyllis Butow, Sharon Carey, Fang Chen, Meredith Cummins, Haryana M. Dhillon, Vesna Dragoje, Kailey Gorman, Matthew Halpin, Abby Haynes, Ilona Juraskova, Sascha Karunaratne, Jamie Keck, Bora Kim, Cherry Koh, Qiang Li, Lara Lipton, Xiaoqiu Liu, Jaime Macedo, Rebecca Mercieca-Bebber, Renee Moreton, Rachael L. Morton, Julie Redfern, Bernhard Riedel, Angus Ritchie, Charbel Sandroussi, Cathy Slattery, Allan Ben Smith, Michael Solomon, Flora Tao, Kate White, Kate Wilson, Kahlia Wolsley, Kun Yu and Daniel Steffensadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Cancers 2026, 18(2), 296; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18020296 (registering DOI) - 18 Jan 2026
Abstract
Background/Objectives: (P)rehabilitation, comprising structured exercise, nutritional optimisation, and/or psychological support delivered pre- or postoperatively, has demonstrated efficacy in improving outcomes across the cancer care continuum. However, access remains limited. Technology-enabled (p)rehabilitation offers a novel solution with the potential to enhance equity and continuity [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: (P)rehabilitation, comprising structured exercise, nutritional optimisation, and/or psychological support delivered pre- or postoperatively, has demonstrated efficacy in improving outcomes across the cancer care continuum. However, access remains limited. Technology-enabled (p)rehabilitation offers a novel solution with the potential to enhance equity and continuity of care. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of technology-enabled (p)rehabilitation on perioperative and patient-reported outcomes among individuals undergoing thoracic and/or abdominopelvic cancer surgery. Methods: Six databases were search from inception to October 2024. Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing technology-enabled (p)rehabilitation with usual care, placebo, or non-technology-based interventions in adults undergoing thoracic and/or abdominopelvic cancer surgery. Outcomes included postoperative complications, hospital readmissions, hospital length of stay (LOS), quality of life (QoL), pain, anxiety, depression, fatigue, distress, and satisfaction. Higher scores indicated improved QoL or worse symptom severity. Risk of bias was assessed using the revised Cochrane tool, and evidence strength was determined using GRADE methodology. Relative risks (RR) and mean differences (MD) were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis. Results: Seventeen RCTs (18 publications, n = 1690) were included. Trials most commonly evaluated application-based platforms (n = 8) and the majority exhibited some risk of bias. Technology-enabled (p)rehabilitation was associated with a significant reduction in LOS (MD = 1.33 days; 95% CI: 0.59–2.07; seven trials), and improvements in pain (MD = 6.12; 95% CI: 3.40–8.84; four trials), depression (MD = 2.82; 95% CI: 0.65–4.99; five trials), fatigue (MD = 10.10; 95% CI: 6.97–13.23; three trials) and distress (MD = 1.23; 95% CI: 0.30–2.16; single trial) compared with controls. Conclusions: Technology-enabled (p)rehabilitation shows promise in reducing LOS and improving selected patient-reported outcomes following thoracic and abdominopelvic cancer surgery. Although evidence is limited due to the small number of studies, modest sample sizes, methodological heterogeneity, and intervention variability, the overall findings justify further investigation. Large-scale, adequately powered clinical trials are required to confirm efficacy and guide clinical effectiveness and implementation studies. Full article
20 pages, 529 KB  
Article
Training and Recruitment to Implement the CASA Psychosocial Intervention in Cancer Care
by Normarie Torres-Blasco, Stephanie D. Torres-Marrero, Ninoshka Rivera-Torres, Denise Cortés-Cortés and Sabrina Pérez-De Santiago
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2026, 23(1), 116; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph23010116 (registering DOI) - 17 Jan 2026
Abstract
Practical training and recruitment strategies are critical for the sustainable implementation of psychosocial interventions. However, few studies have examined how to prepare community partners and doctoral students to support culturally adapted psycho-oncology interventions. This pre-pilot study aims first to evaluate two distinct training [...] Read more.
Practical training and recruitment strategies are critical for the sustainable implementation of psychosocial interventions. However, few studies have examined how to prepare community partners and doctoral students to support culturally adapted psycho-oncology interventions. This pre-pilot study aims first to evaluate two distinct training programs and recruitment procedures, and second to explore preliminary pre-post outcomes of the Caregiver-Patients Support to Cope with Advanced Cancer (CASA) intervention, using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Three clinical psychology graduate students received CASA training, and two community partners completed Recruitment training. We present descriptive pre- and post-assessments, along with qualitative feedback, for both training and institutional (Puerto Rico Biobank) and community-based recruitment outcomes. A related-samples nonparametric analysis examined pre- and post-CASA intervention signals. Results indicated knowledge gains among doctoral students (pre-test M = 3.3; post-test M = 9.3) and community partners (pre-test M = 4.5; post-test M = 9.5). Preliminary outcomes revealed significant improvements in spiritual well-being (Z = −2.618, p = 0.009) and quality of life (Z = −2.957, p = 0.003) and a reduction in depressive (Z = −2.764, p = 0.006), anxiety (Z = −2.667, p = 0.008), and distress (Z = −2.195, p = 0.028) symptoms following CASA. Of 26 recruited dyads, institutional referrals enrolled 16 dyads (61.5%), while community partners referred 10 dyads with a 90.9% success rate. Findings support the feasibility of both training and CASA exploratory outcomes suggest meaningful psychosocial benefits for Latino dyads coping with advanced cancer. Combining institutional infrastructure with community engagement may enhance sustainability and equitable access to psycho-oncology care. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 636 KB  
Review
Artificial Intelligence in Prostate MRI: Redefining the Patient Journey from Imaging to Precision Care
by Giuseppe Pellegrino, Francesca Arnone, Maria Francesca Girlando, Donatello Berloco, Chiara Perazzo, Sonia Triggiani and Gianpaolo Carrafiello
Appl. Sci. 2026, 16(2), 893; https://doi.org/10.3390/app16020893 - 15 Jan 2026
Viewed by 77
Abstract
Prostate cancer remains the most frequently diagnosed malignancy in men and a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) has become the gold standard for non-invasive diagnosis, staging, and follow-up. Yet, its widespread adoption is hampered by long acquisition times, inter-reader variability, [...] Read more.
Prostate cancer remains the most frequently diagnosed malignancy in men and a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) has become the gold standard for non-invasive diagnosis, staging, and follow-up. Yet, its widespread adoption is hampered by long acquisition times, inter-reader variability, and interpretative complexity. Though most papers focus on specific applications without offering a cohesive therapeutic perspective, artificial intelligence (AI) has recently attracted attention as a potential solution to these shortcomings. For instance, deep learning models can help optimize imaging protocols for biparametric and multiparametric MRI, and AI-based reconstruction techniques have shown promise for reducing acquisition times without sacrificing diagnostic performance. Several systems have produced outcomes in the diagnostic phase that are comparable to those of skilled radiologists, as demonstrated in multicenter settings such as PI-CAI. Radiomics and radiogenomics provide more detailed insights into the biology of the disease by extracting quantitative features associated with tumor aggressiveness, extracapsular expansion, and treatment response, in addition to detection. Despite these developments, methodological variability, a lack of multicenter validation, proprietary algorithms, and unresolved standardization and governance difficulties continue to restrict clinical translation. Our work emphasizes the maturity of existing technologies, ongoing gaps, and the progressive integration necessary for successful clinical adoption by presenting AI applications aligned with the patient pathway. In this context, this review aims to outline how AI can support the entire patient journey—from acquisition and protocol selection to detection, quantitative analysis, treatment assessment, and follow-up—while maintaining a clinically centered perspective that emphasizes practical relevance over theoretical discussion, potentially enabling more reliable, effective, and customized patient care in the field of prostate cancer. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 223 KB  
Article
Cognitive Impairment in Cancer Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Cross-Sectional Study
by Betul Aktepe and Oktay Halit Aktepe
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(2), 689; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15020689 - 15 Jan 2026
Viewed by 70
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed cancer care, but their impact on cognition is unclear. This study examined the prevalence and clinical correlates of cognitive impairment in patients receiving ICIs. Materials and Methods: In this two-center, cross-sectional cohort of 189 [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed cancer care, but their impact on cognition is unclear. This study examined the prevalence and clinical correlates of cognitive impairment in patients receiving ICIs. Materials and Methods: In this two-center, cross-sectional cohort of 189 adults with solid tumors treated with ICIs, cognitive function was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Cognitive impairment was defined as MoCA ≤ 21. Age, sex, education, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, treatment line, number of metastatic sites, and ICI exposure were compared between cognitive groups using chi-square tests. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify independent predictors of cognitive impairment. Results: The median age was 65 years and 73% of patients were male. Overall, 102 of 189 participants (54%) met criteria for cognitive impairment. Patients with impaired cognition were more often aged ≥65 years, female, and educated at or below high school level, and more frequently had ECOG ≥ 1, second- or later-line ICI therapy, and ≥2 metastatic sites (all p < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, independent predictors of cognitive impairment were age ≥ 65 years (OR: 2.98, 95% CI 1.45–6.12, p = 0.003), female sex (OR: 2.48, 1.09–5.67, p = 0.030), lower education (OR: 3.10, 1.35–7.07, p = 0.007), later-line therapy (OR: 3.51, 1.56–7.88, p = 0.002), ECOG ≥ 1 (OR: 3.38, 1.46–7.83, p = 0.004), and ≥2 metastatic sites (OR: 2.85, 1.37–5.90, p = 0.005). Conclusions: More than half of patients receiving ICIs exhibit objective cognitive deficits. Systematic cognitive screening in high-risk subgroups may allow for earlier recognition of impairment and more timely supportive care. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Oncology)
12 pages, 644 KB  
Article
Impact of Computational Histology AI Biomarkers on Clinical Management Decisions in Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Multi-Center Real-World Study
by Vignesh T. Packiam, Saum Ghodoussipour, Badrinath R. Konety, Hamed Ahmadi, Gautum Agarwal, Lesli A. Kiedrowski, Viswesh Krishna, Anirudh Joshi, Stephen B. Williams and Armine K. Smith
Cancers 2026, 18(2), 249; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18020249 - 14 Jan 2026
Viewed by 196
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) management is increasingly complex due to conflicting guideline-based risk classifications, ongoing Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) shortages, and emerging alternative therapies. Computational Histology Artificial Intelligence (CHAI) tests are clinically available, providing insights from tumor specimens including predicting BCG [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) management is increasingly complex due to conflicting guideline-based risk classifications, ongoing Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) shortages, and emerging alternative therapies. Computational Histology Artificial Intelligence (CHAI) tests are clinically available, providing insights from tumor specimens including predicting BCG responsiveness and individualized recurrence and progression risks, which may support precision medicine. This technology features biomarkers purpose-built for clinically unmet needs and has practical advantages including a fast turnaround time and no need for consumption of tissue or other specimens. We assessed the impact of such tests on physicians’ decision-making in routine, real-world NMIBC management. Methods: Physicians at six centers ordered CHAI tests (Vesta Bladder) at their discretion during routine NMIBC care. Tumor specimens were processed by a CLIA/CAP-accredited laboratory (Valar Labs, Houston, TX, USA) where H&E-stained slides were analyzed with the CHAI assay to extract histomorphic features of the tumor and microenvironment, which were algorithmically assessed to generate biomarker test results. For each case from 24 June 2024 to 18 July 2025, ordering physicians were surveyed to assess pre- and post-test management plans and post-test result usefulness. Results: Among 105 high-grade NMIBC cases with complete survey results available, primary management changed in 67% (70/105). Changes included modality shifts (n = 7; three to radical cystectomy with high prognostic risk scores; four avoiding cystectomy with low scores) and intravesical agent change (n = 63). Surveillance was intensified in 7%, predominantly among those with ≥90th percentile risk scores. The therapeutic agent changed in 80% (40/50) of predictive biomarker-present (indicative of poor response to BCG) tumors vs. 48% (23/48) of biomarker-absent tumors. Conclusions: In two thirds of cases, CHAI biomarker results influenced clinical decision-making during routine care. BCG predictive biomarker results frequently guided intravesical agent selection. These results have implications for optimizing clinical outcomes, especially in the setting of ongoing BCG shortages. Prognostic risk stratification results guided treatment escalation vs. de-escalation, including surveillance intensification and surgical vs. bladder-sparing decisions. CHAI biomarkers are currently utilized in routine clinical care and informing precision NMIBC management. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1295 KB  
Article
Advancing the Identification of Risk Factors for Invasive Fungal Disease in Children with Cancer
by Marlon Barraza, Romina Valenzuela, Valentina Gutiérrez, Claudia Greppi, Ana M. Álvarez, Jaime Cerda and María Elena Santolaya
J. Fungi 2026, 12(1), 60; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof12010060 - 13 Jan 2026
Viewed by 226
Abstract
Invasive fungal disease (IFD) is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised pediatric patients. This is a multicenter prospective cohort study with a nested retrospective analysis aimed at identifying risk factors for IFD in immunocompromised children with cancer and [...] Read more.
Invasive fungal disease (IFD) is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised pediatric patients. This is a multicenter prospective cohort study with a nested retrospective analysis aimed at identifying risk factors for IFD in immunocompromised children with cancer and episodes of persistent high-risk febrile neutropenia (HRFN). One hundred and seventy-four episodes of persistent HRFN were analyzed, of which 34 (19.5%) were confirmed as IFD, 52.9% were caused by filamentous fungi, and 47.1% by yeasts. Logistic regression and survival analyses identified the following significant risk factors for IFD: male sex (OR 4.04), adolescence (OR 4.65), C-reactive protein ≥ 90 mg/L at admission (OR 3.13), and transfer to a critical care unit (OR 10.73). The predictive model demonstrated strong discriminatory capacity (AUC 0.84), with 79.4% sensitivity and 82.1% specificity. These findings highlight that adolescents, particularly males with severe clinical conditions and elevated inflammatory markers, are at the highest risk for IFD during episodes of HRFN. The proposed risk factor-based model may support early risk stratification and guide targeted antifungal prophylaxis or therapy, potentially improving outcomes in this population. Validation an external cohort is required to confirm these results and optimize clinical applicability. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 2270 KB  
Article
Guided Implant Surgery in Oral Cancer Patients: Initial Clinical Experience from an Academic Point-of-Care Manufacturing Unit
by Manuel Tousidonis, Jose-Ignacio Salmeron, Santiago Ochandiano, Ruben Perez-Mañanes, Estela Gomez-Larren, Elena Aguilera-Jimenez, Carla de Gregorio-Bermejo, Diego Fernández-Acosta, Borja Gonzalez-Moure, Saad Khayat and Carlos Navarro-Cuellar
Medicina 2026, 62(1), 151; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62010151 - 12 Jan 2026
Viewed by 176
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Implant-supported rehabilitation after oral cancer surgery remains technically and biologically demanding due to altered anatomy, scar tissue, and prior radiotherapy. Digital workflows and hospital-based point-of-care (POC) manufacturing now enable personalized, prosthetically driven implant placement with static surgical guides fabricated [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Implant-supported rehabilitation after oral cancer surgery remains technically and biologically demanding due to altered anatomy, scar tissue, and prior radiotherapy. Digital workflows and hospital-based point-of-care (POC) manufacturing now enable personalized, prosthetically driven implant placement with static surgical guides fabricated within the clinical environment. This study reports the initial clinical experience of an academic POC manufacturing unit (UPAM3D) implementing static guided implant surgery in oral cancer patients and compares this approach with conventional outsourcing and dynamic navigation methods. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of 30 consecutive cases (2021–2024) treated with POC-manufactured static guides was conducted using data from the UPAM3D registry. Each record included design, fabrication, and sterilization parameters compliant with ISO 13485 standards. Demographic, surgical, and prosthetic variables were analyzed, including anatomical site (maxilla or mandible), guide type, material, radiotherapy history, number of Ticare Implants®, and loading strategy. Results: All surgical guides were designed and 3D printed in-house using biocompatible resins (BioMed Clear, Dental SG, or LT Clear). The annual number of POC procedures increased progressively (2 → 6 → 6 → 16). Most cases involved oncologic reconstructions of the maxilla or mandible, including irradiated fields. When recorded, primary stability values (mean ISQ ≈ 79) allowed immediate or early loading (ISQ ≥ 70). No major intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred, and all guides met sterilization and traceability standards. Conclusions: Point-of-care manufacturing enables efficient, accurate, and patient-specific guided implant rehabilitation after oral cancer surgery, optimizing functional and esthetic outcomes while reducing procedural time and dependence on external providers. Integrating this process into clinical workflows supports personalized treatment planning and broadens access to advanced implant reconstruction within multidisciplinary oncology care. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research on Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 462 KB  
Article
The Role of TARE for Bridging and Downstaging of HCC Before Resection or Liver Transplant
by Abdullah Alshamrani, Sung Ki Cho, Namkee Oh, Jinsoo Rhu, Gyu-Seong Choi, Dong-Ho Hyun and Jongman Kim
Cancers 2026, 18(2), 225; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18020225 - 11 Jan 2026
Viewed by 104
Abstract
Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a major cause of cancer-related mortality. Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) has emerged as a locoregional therapy to downstage tumors and expand surgical eligibility. Methods: This retrospective study included patients with HCC who underwent TARE as a bridging [...] Read more.
Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a major cause of cancer-related mortality. Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) has emerged as a locoregional therapy to downstage tumors and expand surgical eligibility. Methods: This retrospective study included patients with HCC who underwent TARE as a bridging treatment. The primary outcomes assessed were the efficacy of TARE in facilitating curative surgery and long-term oncological outcomes, specifically overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Results: This study included 25 patients. 17 patients subsequently underwent surgical resection and eight underwent living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT). At a median follow-up of 33.4 months, the median disease-free survival (DFS) was 11.2 months. Patients with recurrence had a median DFS of 3.65 months, and those without recurrence had a median DFS of 27.1 months. The median overall survival (OS) for the cohort was 33.4 months. At the last follow-up, 76% of patients were alive and disease-free. Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated sustained OS in the LDLT group, while resection patients gradually declined within the first two years. Conclusions: TARE is an effective bridging strategy that enables curative-intent surgery in selected patients with HCC and supports favorable long-term oncological outcomes. Careful patient selection and multidisciplinary management remain essential to optimize survival benefits. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Surgical Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 311 KB  
Article
Dental Treatment Discontinuation for Financial Reasons Among Patients with Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study with Non-Cancer Controls
by Kyunghee Lee
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(2), 565; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15020565 - 10 Jan 2026
Viewed by 159
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The extent to which patients with cancer discontinue dental treatment for financial reasons remains unclear. This study compared the prevalence of financially driven dental treatment discontinuation between patients with cancer and without cancer (controls) and identified factors associated with discontinuation among [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The extent to which patients with cancer discontinue dental treatment for financial reasons remains unclear. This study compared the prevalence of financially driven dental treatment discontinuation between patients with cancer and without cancer (controls) and identified factors associated with discontinuation among patients with cancer. Methods: This cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey conducted in November 2024 comprised 500 patients who had one of five common cancers in Japan and 500 non-cancer participants allocated to reflect the cancer group age distributions, sex, and household income. Only patients who received cancer treatment within the past 5 years and had a family dental clinic were included. Discontinuation was assessed from self-reported dental treatment cessation for economic reasons. Univariate analyses were employed for group comparisons (p < 0.05). Results: Dental treatment discontinuation for financial reasons occurred in 3.4% (95% CI 2.1–5.4%) of patients with cancer and 5.8% (95% CI 4.1–8.2%) of controls (p = 0.096). Among the patients with cancer, those who discontinued were younger (58.8 vs. 66.1 years, p = 0.010) and frequently reported physical or psychological barriers to dental care and discontinuation being financially driven (all p < 0.001). They also had poor oral health-related quality of life (Oral Health Impact Profile-14: 17.4 vs. 7.8, p < 0.001) and greater financial toxicity (Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity: 24.6 vs. 29.3, p = 0.001). Conclusions: Oral health-related quality of life was lower among participants reporting dental treatment discontinuation. Early identification of financial barriers and support may warrant further study. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Dentistry, Oral Surgery and Oral Medicine)
41 pages, 1474 KB  
Review
Revisiting the Warburg-Based “Sugar Feeds Cancer” Hypothesis: A Critical Appraisal of Epidemiological, Experimental and Mechanistic Evidence
by Karim Khaled, Hala Jardaly and Byeongsang Oh
Onco 2026, 6(1), 5; https://doi.org/10.3390/onco6010005 - 8 Jan 2026
Viewed by 302
Abstract
Background: The belief that “sugar feeds cancer” is widespread and has strongly influenced public perceptions, patient behavior, and dietary recommendations, despite uncertainty regarding its scientific validity. This belief largely stems from misinterpretation of the Warburg effect, which describes altered glucose metabolism in cancer [...] Read more.
Background: The belief that “sugar feeds cancer” is widespread and has strongly influenced public perceptions, patient behavior, and dietary recommendations, despite uncertainty regarding its scientific validity. This belief largely stems from misinterpretation of the Warburg effect, which describes altered glucose metabolism in cancer cells rather than dietary sugar dependence. The objective of this review was to critically evaluate whether dietary sugar intake directly contributes to cancer development or progression by examining the totality of epidemiological, experimental, and mechanistic evidence. Methods: We conducted a narrative review of human epidemiological studies, experimental animal and cell-based models, and mechanistic investigations published between 1980 and July 2025. Evidence was synthesized across cancer types, sugar sources, and biological pathways, with careful consideration of study design, exposure relevance, and key confounders, including obesity, insulin resistance, and overall dietary patterns. Results: Across cancer types, epidemiological evidence showed predominantly null or inconsistent associations between sugar intake and cancer risk or outcomes, with positive findings largely confined to metabolically susceptible subgroups and often attenuated after adjustment for adiposity and energy intake. Experimental studies suggested potential tumor-promoting effects under non-physiological conditions, while mechanistic data indicated that sugar influences cancer risk indirectly through insulin signaling, inflammation, and metabolic dysfunction rather than direct tumor fueling. Conclusions: Current evidence does not support the hypothesis that dietary sugar directly “feeds” cancer in humans. Overemphasis on sugar avoidance risks nutritional and psychological harm, particularly among cancer patients. Evidence-based guidance should prioritize overall dietary quality, metabolic health, and patient well-being rather than isolated sugar restriction. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 875 KB  
Systematic Review
Pain and Suicide Behavior in Cancer Patients: Implications for Personalized Treatment—A Systematic Review
by Alessio Simonetti, Davide Tripaldella, Francesca Bardi, Mario Pinto, Romina Caso, Gianmarco Stella, Leonardo Monacelli, Giovanni Camardese, Antonio Maria D’Onofrio, Silvia Montanari, Delfina Janiri and Gabriele Sani
J. Pers. Med. 2026, 16(1), 42; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm16010042 - 8 Jan 2026
Viewed by 207
Abstract
Objective: Pain is among the most common and debilitating symptoms experienced by oncology patients and has been associated with adverse mental health outcomes, including depression and suicide. Nevertheless, the relationship between pain and suicide in oncology populations remains insufficiently characterized. A clearer understanding [...] Read more.
Objective: Pain is among the most common and debilitating symptoms experienced by oncology patients and has been associated with adverse mental health outcomes, including depression and suicide. Nevertheless, the relationship between pain and suicide in oncology populations remains insufficiently characterized. A clearer understanding of this interplay is essential to guide personalized approaches aimed at reducing cancer-related burden and improving quality of life. Methods: We searched PubMed and PsycInfo without imposing limits regarding publication date using pain* AND (suicid* OR “self-harm” OR “self-injurious behavior” OR “self-inflicted injury” or “self-killing”) AND (cancer* OR oncolog* OR tumor* OR neoplasm* OR metasta*). A total of 832 articles were identified, and 15 of them were included in our review. Results: Inadequately managed pain in cancer patients is associated with a significantly elevated risk of suicidal ideation. This association is further exacerbated in individuals presenting with depressive symptoms, advanced-stage disease, or limited access to timely psychological support. These factors may interact synergistically, intensifying the emotional and cognitive burden of pain, thereby increasing vulnerability in cancer patients. Conclusions: Cancer-related pain should be conceptualized as a highly variable indicator of psychological vulnerability. Factors influencing this variability include cancer type and severity, as well as the presence of past psychopathology. These findings support the need for a personalized medicine approach, whereby pain management and psychosocial interventions are tailored to patient-specific factors such as disease stage, psychological comorbidity, and access to supportive care. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights into Personalized Medicine for Anesthesia and Pain)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 497 KB  
Systematic Review
Evidence-Based Consensus on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Advanced HER2-Positive and HER2-Low Breast Cancer in Colombia
by Mauricio Lema, Luz F. Sua, Abrahám José Hernández Blanquisett, William Mantilla, Marc Edy Pierre, Hernán Carranza, Julio Ricardo Zuluaga Peña, Aura Victoria Gutiérrez Raba and Sandra Ximena Franco
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(2), 514; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15020514 - 8 Jan 2026
Viewed by 415
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The management of advanced HER2-positive and HER2-low breast cancer is evolving rapidly. This study aimed to generate national, evidence-based clinical recommendations for Colombia, addressing the lack of standardized local guidance. Methods: A systematic literature search (2020–2024) was conducted. The evidence was evaluated [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The management of advanced HER2-positive and HER2-low breast cancer is evolving rapidly. This study aimed to generate national, evidence-based clinical recommendations for Colombia, addressing the lack of standardized local guidance. Methods: A systematic literature search (2020–2024) was conducted. The evidence was evaluated using AGREE II, RoB 2, ROBINS-I, and JBI tools. Recommendations were developed using the GRADE approach and a structured modified Delphi consensus process involving 34 national experts. Results: A total of 22 clinical recommendations were formulated. These address HER2 quantification and reporting, first-line and subsequent-line therapy, and management of brain metastases. Five recommendations (23%) were classified as strong, supported by high-certainty evidence, while 17 (77%) were conditional, reflecting the need for adaptation to local contexts and resource availability. Conclusions: This consensus provides updated, context-specific clinical guidance to optimize the care of patients with advanced HER2-positive and HER2-low breast cancer in Colombia. The recommendations are designed to standardize care, improve patient outcomes, and promote equitable access to innovative therapies within the Colombian healthcare system. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Obstetrics & Gynecology)
Show Figures

Figure A1

2 pages, 867 KB  
Correction
Correction: Kingshott et al. Alteration of Metabolic Conditions Impacts the Regulation of IGF-II/H19 Imprinting Status in Prostate Cancer. Cancers 2021, 13, 825
by Georgina Kingshott, Kalina Biernacka, Alex Sewell, Paida Gwiti, Rachel Barker, Hanna Zielinska, Amanda Gilkes, Kathryn McCarthy, Richard M. Martin, J. Athene Lane, Lucy McGeagh, Anthony Koupparis, Edward Rowe, Jon Oxley, Jeff M. P. Holly and Claire M. Perks
Cancers 2026, 18(2), 204; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18020204 - 8 Jan 2026
Viewed by 105
Abstract
In the original publication [...] Full article
Show Figures

Figure 2

13 pages, 657 KB  
Article
Pre- and Post-Evaluation of an Interprofessional Education Program Combining Online and In-Person Instruction on Enhancing Empathy of Medical Students
by Kaori Yamada, Yoko Inaguma, Sayuri Nakamura, Masatsugu Ohtsuki, Hitomi Kataoka and Atsuhiko Ota
Int. Med. Educ. 2026, 5(1), 11; https://doi.org/10.3390/ime5010011 - 8 Jan 2026
Viewed by 174
Abstract
This pre–post study aimed to determine whether interprofessional education (IPE) combining online and in-person instruction enhanced medical students’ empathy. The IPE program was conducted during the academic years 2022 and 2023 for medical (n = 240) and other healthcare students. Subjects discussed [...] Read more.
This pre–post study aimed to determine whether interprofessional education (IPE) combining online and in-person instruction enhanced medical students’ empathy. The IPE program was conducted during the academic years 2022 and 2023 for medical (n = 240) and other healthcare students. Subjects discussed a case scenario involving a patient with chronic myeloid leukemia, sharing their ideas within their team and with other teams. The medical students’ empathy was assessed before and after the IPE program using the Japanese version of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy for Health Professions Students (JSE-HPS). Medical students provided written responses to the question, “What do you think is necessary for the care of patients with cancer, besides medical skills and knowledge?” Empathy-related terms were identified using frequency and co-occurrence analyses. The frequencies before and after the IPE were compared. The median JSE-HPS score rose from 98.0 to 114.0 (p < 0.001, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). The frequency of words categorized as demonstrating empathy increased from 37.9% to 52.9% after the IPE (p < 0.01, chi-square test). Our hybrid IPE program enhanced medical students’ empathy, which was supported by both quantitative and qualitative methods. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1280 KB  
Article
Real-World Survival Outcomes Following Metastasectomy in RAS Wild-Type mCRC: Insights from a Multicentre National Cohort Study
by İlker Nihat Ökten, Tuba Baydaş, Mahmut Emre Yıldırım, Cemil Bilir, Şuayib Yalçın, Erdem Çubukçu, Eda Tanrıkulu Şimşek, Çağatay Aslan, Faysal Dane, Sinemis Çelik, Ahmet Bilici, Mehmet Ali Nahit Şendur, Bala Başak Öven, Abdurrahman Işıkdoğan, Hacı Mehmet Türk, Mustafa Karaca, Bülent Karabulut, Melike Özçelik, Mahmut Gümüş, Umut Kefeli and Nuri Karadurmuşadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(2), 467; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15020467 - 7 Jan 2026
Viewed by 231
Abstract
Background: Metastasectomy is a cornerstone of multimodal management in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), yet contemporary real-world data focusing specifically on RAS wild-type (RAS-WT) disease remain limited. We aimed to evaluate survival outcomes and prognostic factors associated with metastasectomy in patients with RAS-WT [...] Read more.
Background: Metastasectomy is a cornerstone of multimodal management in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), yet contemporary real-world data focusing specifically on RAS wild-type (RAS-WT) disease remain limited. We aimed to evaluate survival outcomes and prognostic factors associated with metastasectomy in patients with RAS-WT mCRC using a large national multicentre registry. Methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized data from the ONKO-KOLON Türkiye registry. A total of 1079 patients with pathologically confirmed KRAS/NRAS wild-type mCRC were identified and categorized according to receipt of metastasectomy. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared with log-rank tests across multiple clinically relevant time origins, including metastatic diagnosis, initial colorectal cancer diagnosis, and time of metastasectomy. Prognostic factors within the metastasectomy cohort were assessed using univariate Cox proportional hazards models. Serum CEA and CA19-9 were analyzed after log10 transformation. Results: Among 1079 patients, 185 (17.1%) underwent metastasectomy. Patients receiving metastasectomy demonstrated significantly longer OS compared with those managed non-surgically when survival was calculated from the time of metastatic diagnosis (hazard ratio [HR] for death 0.36, 95% CI 0.27–0.47; p < 0.001), as well as improved PFS (HR for progression or death 0.39, 95% CI 0.30–0.52; p < 0.001). The survival advantage remained consistent when OS was measured from the time of initial colorectal cancer diagnosis (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.25–0.50; p < 0.001). Median OS following metastasectomy was 43 months (95% CI 31.4–45.6). In univariate analyses within the metastasectomy cohort, higher baseline CA19-9 levels were significantly associated with inferior OS when analyzed both as a continuous variable (per log10 increase; HR 1.81, 95% CI 1.20–2.75; p = 0.005) and as a categorical variable (above vs. below threshold; HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.16–0.86; p = 0.021). Other clinicopathologic factors, including age, CEA, tumor sidedness, grade, MSI status, and metastatic burden, were not significantly associated with survival. Conclusions: In this large, real-world national cohort of RAS-WT mCRC, metastasectomy was strongly associated with prolonged survival across multiple clinically relevant time frames. Within surgically treated patients, baseline CA19-9 emerged as the most informative prognostic marker, while traditional clinicopathologic variables showed limited discriminatory value. These findings highlight the importance of careful patient selection and support further prospective studies integrating molecular and biomarker-based strategies to refine prognostication and optimize surgical decision-making in RAS-WT mCRC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop