Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (72)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = robot-assisted partial nephrectomy

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
12 pages, 245 KB  
Article
Evaluating the Transition from 3D Laparoscopy to Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: Trifecta Achievement and Nephrometry Score Differences
by Piotr Kania, Paweł Marczuk, Jakub Biedrzycki, Markijan Kubis, Szymon Kania, Kajetan Juszczak and Maciej Salagierski
Cancers 2025, 17(24), 3976; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17243976 - 13 Dec 2025
Viewed by 335
Abstract
Background: Partial nephrectomy (PN) is the standard treatment for localized renal tumors where nephron preservation is feasible. The evolution of minimally invasive surgery has progressed from conventional two-dimensional laparoscopy to three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy and, more recently, to robotic-assisted techniques. Although robotic and laparoscopic [...] Read more.
Background: Partial nephrectomy (PN) is the standard treatment for localized renal tumors where nephron preservation is feasible. The evolution of minimally invasive surgery has progressed from conventional two-dimensional laparoscopy to three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy and, more recently, to robotic-assisted techniques. Although robotic and laparoscopic PN have been widely compared, evidence focusing on a complete transition from 3D laparoscopy to robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) remains scarce. Methods: This retrospective single-surgeon study included 80 consecutive patients treated between 2018 and 2024, encompassing the full transition period from 3D LPN to RAPN. Thirty-six patients underwent 3D laparoscopy and forty-four underwent robotic surgery, excluding the first ten robotic cases representing the learning phase. Propensity score weighting was applied to minimize baseline differences. Results: Tumors treated with RAPN had significantly higher RENAL scores (median 8 vs. 6, p = 0.001), indicating greater complexity, while perioperative outcomes—including hospital stay, operative time, and complication rates—remained comparable. Warm ischemia time was significantly shorter in the RAPN group (17.5 vs. 22 min, p = 0.005), and the TRIFECTA rate was higher though not statistically significant. Conclusions: These results indicate that a complete transition from 3D laparoscopy to robotic partial nephrectomy is safe and feasible, maintaining or improving outcomes even in more complex tumors and broadening the applicability of nephron-sparing surgery. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Optimizing Surgical Procedures and Outcomes in Renal Cancer)
14 pages, 6149 KB  
Article
Combined Laparoscopic–Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: A Comparative Analysis of Technical Efficiency and Safety
by Irfan Safak Barlas, Mehmet Yilmaz, Halil Cagri Aybal, Mehmet Duvarci, Selcuk Guven and Lutfi Tunc
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(24), 8693; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14248693 - 8 Dec 2025
Viewed by 321
Abstract
Background/Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of a combined approach to partial nephrectomy, which involves laparoscopic dissection for kidney as well as renal hilum mobilization, followed by robotic assistance for tumor resection and intracorporeal suturing, integrating the technical advantages of [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of a combined approach to partial nephrectomy, which involves laparoscopic dissection for kidney as well as renal hilum mobilization, followed by robotic assistance for tumor resection and intracorporeal suturing, integrating the technical advantages of both laparoscopic and robotic surgery. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 99 patients with clinical stage 1 renal tumors who underwent laparoscopic (LPN, n = 31), robot-assisted (RAPN, n = 16), or combined partial nephrectomy (CPN, n = 52) between 2016 and 2024. CPN involved laparoscopic mobilization of the kidney and renal hilum, followed by robotic tumor excision and intracorporeal suturing. Perioperative and postoperative outcomes were compared across groups. Results: Comparative analysis of the demographic characteristics of patients who underwent LPN, RAPN and CPN revealed no significant differences. The mean operative time (OT) was 126.75 ± 25.28 min for CPN, 121.9 ± 9.5 min for LPN (p = 0.014), and 155.5 ± 18.03 min for RAPN (p < 0.001). The median warm ischemia time (WIT) was 20.0 min (10.0–26.0) for CPN, which is comparable to RAPN at 18.5 min (14.0–23.0) (p = 0.158), but it was significantly longer for LPN at 23.0 min (18.0–28.0) (p < 0.001). The estimated blood loss (EBL) was 120.0 mL (50.0–350.0) for CPN, which is similar to RAPN at 110.0 mL (50.0–300.0) (p = 0.158), while it was higher for LPN at 180.0 mL (100.0–250.0) (p < 0.001). No major intraoperative or postoperative complications classified as Clavien–Dindo grade ≥3 were observed in any group. Conclusions: CPN is a feasible and safe approach for clinical stage 1 renal tumors, combining the efficiency of laparoscopy with the precision of robotics. Compared with LPN and RAPN, CPN showed comparable early oncological and functional results and had shorter operative duration and improved perioperative parameters. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Nephrology & Urology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 451 KB  
Article
Impact of On-Demand Selective Suturing on Renal Function Preservation During Clampless Robotic-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: Insights from a Large Multicentric Italian Cohort
by Angelo Porreca, Davide De Marchi, Filippo Marino, Marco Giampaoli, Daniele D’Agostino, Francesca Simonetti, Antonio Amodeo, Paolo Corsi, Francesco Claps, Alessandro Crestani, Daniele Romagnoli, Pier Paolo Prontera, Gian Maria Busetto and Luca Di Gianfrancesco
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(21), 7534; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14217534 - 24 Oct 2025
Viewed by 465
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate perioperative outcomes, renal function preservation, and short-term oncologic results of off-clamp, sutureless, or selectively sutured robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) in patients with renal tumors treated at multiple high-volume centers. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included 250 patients who [...] Read more.
Objectives: To evaluate perioperative outcomes, renal function preservation, and short-term oncologic results of off-clamp, sutureless, or selectively sutured robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) in patients with renal tumors treated at multiple high-volume centers. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included 250 patients who underwent off-clamp, sutureless/selectively sutured RAPN between January 2018 and December 2024. Patients with solitary kidneys, tumors > 7 cm, or prior renal surgery were excluded. All procedures were performed without renal artery clamping, using hemostatic agents and selective suturing when necessary. Perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes were compared with 313 patients who underwent standard RAPN with parenchymal suturing. Results: The median operative time was 110 min (IQR 100–140), and the median estimated blood loss was 180 mL (IQR 100–250). The overall complication rate was 8.4%, predominantly Clavien–Dindo grade I–II, with no conversions to open surgery. The median decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at three months was 5.5% (IQR 3.5–8.9; p = 0.56), and no cases of acute kidney injury were recorded. The positive surgical margin rate was 3.7%, and no tumor recurrences were observed during the 12-month follow-up period. Conclusions: Off-clamp, sutureless or selectively sutured robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) was not associated with increased perioperative risk, renal functional decline, or compromised short-term oncologic control compared with conventional sutured RAPN. These findings indicate that the technique is feasible and safe in appropriately selected patients, although prospective studies with longer follow-up are needed to confirm long-term outcomes and refine patient selection criteria. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Status and Future of Urological Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1240 KB  
Article
Renal Functional Outcomes in Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy with Minimum Layer Resection Using Virtual Three-Dimensional Image Assistance
by Shuji Isotani, Tomoki Kimura, Taiki Ogasa, Takuro Kobayashi, Ippei Hiramatsu, Takeshi Ieda, Toshiyuki China, Fumitaka Shimizu, Masayoshi Nagata, Yuki Nakagawa, Hisamitsu Ide and Shigeo Horie
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(20), 7133; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14207133 - 10 Oct 2025
Viewed by 1004
Abstract
Background: Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is a standard approach for localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC), emphasizing renal functional preservation. The Minimum Layer Resection (MLR) method, guided by 3D virtual partial nephrectomy (3DvPN) planning, was developed to balance oncological safety with parenchymal preservation. [...] Read more.
Background: Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is a standard approach for localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC), emphasizing renal functional preservation. The Minimum Layer Resection (MLR) method, guided by 3D virtual partial nephrectomy (3DvPN) planning, was developed to balance oncological safety with parenchymal preservation. This study evaluated functional and oncological outcomes of RAPN with MLR and identified predictors of renal functional decline. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 237 patients (after screening 312 cases) who underwent RAPN between 2012 and 2022 with ≥36-month follow-up. 3DvPN planning was used to guide MLR when feasible; both MLR and non-MLR were available and applied throughout the study period according to predefined indications. The primary endpoint was the percentage of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) preservation at 36 months; a ≥10% decline was clinically significant. Secondary endpoints included perioperative outcomes, acute kidney injury (AKI), and oncological outcomes such as margin involvement and recurrence. Results: The median age was 60 years, tumor size 29 mm, and warm ischemia time 21 min, with selective or superselective clamping achieved in 62.8% of cases. Postoperative AKI occurred in 25.0% (no patient required dialysis). At 3 years, the median eGFR preservation rate was 84.4%, and 28.5% of patients experienced a ≥10% decline. Independent predictors of short-term decline (14 days) were BMI > 25 kg/m2, AKI, and WIT > 25 min, whereas long-term decline (36 months) was associated with tumor size > 30 mm and WIT > 25 min. Margin involvement was 1.7%, recurrence 3.8%, and major complications (Clavien–Dindo ≥IV) occurred in 1.7%. Conclusions: In conclusion, RAPN with the MLR technique under 3DvPN guidance demonstrated favorable perioperative outcomes, acceptable oncologic safety, and good mid-term renal functional preservation (up to 36 months). The approach provides a reproducible surgical strategy that maximizes parenchymal preservation while maintaining negative surgical margins. Prospective multicenter studies with longer follow-up are warranted to confirm long-term durability and to define the role of MLR in routine practice. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Robotic Urological Surgery: Clinical Updates for Better Outcomes)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

10 pages, 515 KB  
Article
Metastatic Potential of Very Small (≤2 cm) Renal Cell Carcinoma: Insights from a Single-Center Experience and Review of the Literature
by Lorenzo Giuseppe Luciani, Tommaso Ceccato, Tommaso Cai, Stefano Chiodini, Simone Botti, Valentino Vattovani, Marco Puglisi, Andrea Abramo and Daniele Mattevi
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(19), 6781; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14196781 - 25 Sep 2025
Viewed by 1547
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Small renal masses (SRMs) are being detected more often due to the increasing use of imaging techniques. Many of these lesions are benign or grow slowly, but a small proportion can exhibit aggressive behavior. Several reports have shown that synchronous metastases may [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Small renal masses (SRMs) are being detected more often due to the increasing use of imaging techniques. Many of these lesions are benign or grow slowly, but a small proportion can exhibit aggressive behavior. Several reports have shown that synchronous metastases may occur even in small renal cell carcinomas (RCCs). Our aim is to assess the malignant potential and the metastatic risk of very small RCCs (≤2 cm). Methods: We reviewed consecutive patients who underwent partial nephrectomy for SRMs at our tertiary referral center between 2005 and 2024, focusing on those with a maximum pathologic diameter ≤ 2 cm. Clinical and pathological data were collected, and cases with aggressive features were described. In addition, a literature search on the Medline/PubMed database was performed to identify previously published cases of RCC ≤ 2 cm and to assess their risk of synchronous metastases (SM). Results: Among 578 patients who underwent partial nephrectomy, 116 patients (20%) had tumors ≤ 2 cm, 90 (77.5%) of which were malignant, whereas 22.5% were benign (oncocytoma = 13%; angiomyolipoma = 5%). Median age and tumor size were 51 yrs and 1.7 cm, respectively. Histology showed clear cell (72.2%), papillary (20%), chromophobe (6.6%), and mixed (0.9%). Two patients (2.2%) experienced aggressive disease: one with synchronous metastases and one with recurrence and later progression. From the literature, we identified 16 additional cases of RCC ≤ 2 cm with synchronous metastases and found an important heterogeneity of results regarding the metastatic potential of SRMs. Conclusions: Although uncommon, synchronous metastases can occur in RCCs even smaller than 1–2 cm. Reported rates for SM of SRMs across the literature range between 1% and 13%, with higher risk observed in tumors larger than 3 cm, but without an absolute safe cutoff. Tumor size alone is therefore insufficient to exclude aggressive potential. Clinical decision-making should consider histology, grade, patient age, radiologic features, and emerging molecular markers to guide surveillance and treatment in this growing patient population. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Advancements in Urologic Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 4341 KB  
Systematic Review
The Role of Near-Infrared Fluorescence with Indocyanine Green in Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: Results from an Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of Controlled Studies
by Andrea Panunzio, Rossella Orlando, Federico Greco, Clara Cerrato, Serena Domenica D’Elia, Laura Marinaci, Federica Manno, Aliasger Shakir, Michele Battaglia, Willy Baccaglini, Antonio Benito Porcaro, Alessandro Antonelli, Andre Abreu and Alessandro Tafuri
Medicina 2025, 61(10), 1735; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61101735 - 24 Sep 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1065
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Partial nephrectomy is the standard treatment for small renal tumors, balancing cancer control with renal function preservation. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) has improved surgical precision and reduced morbidity. Near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging with indocyanine green (ICG) improves intraoperative visualization [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Partial nephrectomy is the standard treatment for small renal tumors, balancing cancer control with renal function preservation. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) has improved surgical precision and reduced morbidity. Near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging with indocyanine green (ICG) improves intraoperative visualization of renal vasculature and tissue perfusion, potentially enabling selective arterial clamping to reduce ischemic injury. This study updates contemporary evidence on NIRF/ICG-guided RAPN, focusing on intraoperative, perioperative, and renal function outcomes. Materials and Methods: We systematically queried PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases up to June 2025 for controlled prospective and retrospective studies comparing NIRF/ICG-guided RAPN (selective clamping or zero-ischemia) versus conventional RAPN with main artery clamping in adults with renal masses. Data were synthesized narratively, and random-effects meta-analyses were performed on warm ischemia time (WIT), operative time, estimated blood loss, transfusion rate, length of hospital stay, complication rate, positive surgical margins, and variation in renal function. Results: Eleven studies (10 full-text and one abstract), including two randomized controlled trials, encompassing a patient population of 893 patients (403 NIRF/ICG-guided RAPN and 490 conventional RAPN), were included. Ischemia strategies varied between no clamping, selective or super-selective clamping for NIRF/ICG, and main artery clamping for controls. ICG doses ranging from 3 to 7.5 mg or 0.5–7 mL. Most evidence was classified as level 2b or 3b, indicating a moderate to serious risk of bias. Meta-analysis showed that compared to conventional RAPN, NIRF/ICG-guided RAPN was associated with a shorter WIT (MD: −1.30 min, 95% CI: −2.51 to −0.09; p = 0.039), with no differences in other outcomes. Renal function favored NIRF/ICG at discharge and short-term follow-up, although the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusions: NIRF/ICG reduces WIT during RAPN without increasing perioperative risks. The technique shows promise for better preserving functional outcomes. However, further well-designed, large-scale trials with longer follow-up are needed to confirm these benefits and define clinical indications. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1325 KB  
Article
Evaluating the Efficacy of Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy in Complex Renal Tumours: A Single-Centre Retrospective Study
by Mohammad Hifzi Mohd Hashim, Iqbal Hussain Rizuana, Zulkifli Md Zainuddin, Li Yi Lim, Hau Chun Khoo, Suzliza Shukor, Muhammad Hasif Azizi and Xeng Inn Fam
Medicina 2025, 61(9), 1702; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61091702 - 19 Sep 2025
Viewed by 1400
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is a preferred minimally invasive option for renal tumours, but its use in highly complex cases (RENAL score ≥ 9) remains underexplored. Only four Asian countries, India, China, South Korea, and Japan, have published studies [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is a preferred minimally invasive option for renal tumours, but its use in highly complex cases (RENAL score ≥ 9) remains underexplored. Only four Asian countries, India, China, South Korea, and Japan, have published studies on RAPN for complex kidney tumours, highlighting limited evidence. The aim of this study is to assess the perioperative, functional, and oncological effects of RAPN for complex renal tumours at a single tertiary centre in Malaysia. Materials and Methods: Patient demographics, tumour characteristics, perioperative parameters, and postoperative results were collected through a retrospective review that was conducted on 35 patients who had undergone RAPN between January 2023 and June 2024. The outcomes were analyzed using descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and comparative tests between surgical approaches (transperitoneal vs. retroperitoneal). Results: Of the 35 patients, all had high-complexity tumours. RAPN achieved a “trifecta” outcome in 88.6% of patients. Significantly lower intraoperative blood loss is associated with the retroperitoneal approach in comparison with the transperitoneal approach, whereas other perioperative parameters, which include warm ischaemia time, did not show any significant differences. No positive surgical margins were observed, and no local recurrences or port-site metastases were detected during a mean follow-up of 11.31 ± 5.78 months. Postoperative changes in renal function were negligible, with a mean creatinine change of 5.69 ± 20.39 µmol/L. Conclusions: RAPN is a safe and effective option for complex renal tumours, offering excellent functional and oncological outcomes. The choice between transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches should be tailored to tumour characteristics for optimal surgical outcomes. This single-centre Malaysian study contributes to the limited Southeast Asian literature on RAPN for complex renal tumours. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Urology & Nephrology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 270 KB  
Review
Single-Port vs. Multi-Port Robotic Surgery in Urologic Oncology: A Comparative Analysis of Current Evidence and Future Directions
by Stamatios Katsimperis, Lazaros Tzelves, Georgios Feretzakis, Themistoklis Bellos, Konstantinos Douroumis, Nikolaos Kostakopoulos and Andreas Skolarikos
Cancers 2025, 17(17), 2847; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17172847 - 29 Aug 2025
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1893
Abstract
The evolution of robotic surgery in urologic oncology has led to the emergence of single-port (SP) robotic systems as a potential alternative to the widely adopted multi-port (MP) platforms. This narrative review provides a comprehensive comparison between SP and MP robotic systems, the [...] Read more.
The evolution of robotic surgery in urologic oncology has led to the emergence of single-port (SP) robotic systems as a potential alternative to the widely adopted multi-port (MP) platforms. This narrative review provides a comprehensive comparison between SP and MP robotic systems, the former of which received FDA approval in 2018 and CE marking in 2024, focusing on their application across radical prostatectomy, partial and radical nephrectomy, and radical cystectomy. Drawing from the most current literature, we examine perioperative outcomes, oncologic efficacy, postoperative recovery, and complication rates. The review highlights the technical challenges unique to SP surgery, including restricted triangulation, limited instrumentation, and a defined learning curve, while also emphasizing innovations such as transvesical prostatectomy and the Supine Anterior Retroperitoneal Access (SARA) approach. Additionally, we explore the potential impact of emerging technologies—such as artificial intelligence, augmented reality, and telesurgery—on the future of SP platforms. Despite early limitations, SP systems have demonstrated comparable safety and effectiveness in selected cases and may offer unique advantages in specific anatomical scenarios. Continued innovation, structured training, and robust long-term outcome data will be essential for the broader adoption and integration of SP robotic surgery in clinical practice. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Robot-Assisted Surgery for Urologic Cancer)
10 pages, 825 KB  
Article
Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes for Complex Renal Tumors Between the Da Vinci and Hinotori Surgical Robot System During Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
by Daisuke Motoyama, Kyohei Watanabe, Yuto Matsushita, Hiromitsu Watanabe, Keita Tamura, Hideaki Miyake and Teruo Inamoto
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(16), 5850; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14165850 - 19 Aug 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1598
Abstract
Background/Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for complex renal tumors performed using the novel Japanese Hinotori Surgical Robot System (HSRS) and the established Da Vinci Surgical System (DVSS). Methods: Of 484 [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for complex renal tumors performed using the novel Japanese Hinotori Surgical Robot System (HSRS) and the established Da Vinci Surgical System (DVSS). Methods: Of 484 consecutive patients who underwent RAPN at our institution, 126 with complex renal tumors were included in the DVSS group, and 48 such patients were included in the HSRS group. Complex tumors in this series were defined by the presence of at least one of the following factors: cT1b, completely endophytic, hilar, cystic, or ipsilateral multiple tumors. Results: Following 1:2 propensity score matching, 74 and 37 patients were included in the DVSS and HSRS groups, respectively. Post-matching, most covariates’ absolute standardized mean difference (SMD) was less than 0.1, indicating effective baseline imbalance correction. All RAPN procedures using HSRS were completed without conversion to open surgery, nephrectomy, or Clavien–Dindo ≥3 postoperative complications. No significant differences in major perioperative outcomes were observed between DVSS and HSRS, including operative time (178 vs. 186 min), console time (115 vs. 115 min; encompassing cockpit time for HSRS), warm ischemia time (15 vs. 15 min), and estimated blood loss (51 vs. 30 mL). Positive surgical margin rates (DVSS 1.4% vs. HSRS 5.4%) and Trifecta achievement rates (94.6% vs. 91.9%) were also comparable, with no significant differences. Conclusions: These findings suggest that, even in patients with complex renal tumors, RAPN performed using the HSRS can achieve perioperative outcomes comparable to those obtained with the established DVSS. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Robotic Urological Surgery: Clinical Updates for Better Outcomes)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 489 KB  
Review
Early Clinical Outcomes of the Novel Hinotori Robotic System in Urological Surgery—A Review of Existing Literature
by Simone Meiqi Ong, Hong Min Peng, Wei Zheng So and Ho Yee Tiong
Soc. Int. Urol. J. 2025, 6(4), 56; https://doi.org/10.3390/siuj6040056 - 19 Aug 2025
Viewed by 2082
Abstract
Robotic-assisted surgery has gradually established its role in uro-oncological cases that demand a high level of precision, optimising surgeon ergonomics and decreasing fatigue whilst maintaining optimal clinical outcomes. With the novel Hinotori surgical robot (Medicaroid Corporation (Kobe, Hyogo, Japan)) launched in Japan back [...] Read more.
Robotic-assisted surgery has gradually established its role in uro-oncological cases that demand a high level of precision, optimising surgeon ergonomics and decreasing fatigue whilst maintaining optimal clinical outcomes. With the novel Hinotori surgical robot (Medicaroid Corporation (Kobe, Hyogo, Japan)) launched in Japan back in 2019, it has now demonstrated its use case across various clinical series of different surgeries. We sought to narratively synthesise the initial feasibility of the Hinotori robotic system in urology. A systematic, comprehensive literature search was conducted across various databases from September 2024 to October 2024. Relevant keywords within the scope of this study were generated for a more accurate search. After exclusion and removal of duplicates, a total of nine articles were included for review. Among the included studies, one study reported data solely on radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer, two studies reported on robotic-assisted nephroureterectomy for renal tumours, two studies reported on partial nephrectomy performed for renal masses, two studies reported on radical nephrectomy carried out for renal malignancies and one study reported on robotic-assisted adrenalectomy for adrenal cancer. Lastly, one study collectively reported on outcomes pertaining to partial nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy, vesicourethral anastomosis and pelvic lymph node dissection in a porcine model, as well as partial nephrectomy, radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection in cadavers. The current literature supports its non-inferiority to the well-established Da Vinci system, with no major drawbacks or concerns identified when comparing parameters such as intraoperative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), perioperative events (transfusions, conversion to open surgery), length of hospital stay and major postoperative complications. Future studies involving larger cohorts and more complex surgical cases are essential to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Hinotori system. The new Hinotori robotic system offers unique three-dimensional features as a non-inferior robotic platform alternative that has proven clinically safe thus far in its use. Larger scale studies and randomised trials are eagerly awaited to assess and validate more holistically its clinical utility. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 773 KB  
Article
Off-Clamp Robotic-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: Retrospective Comparative Analysis from a Large Italian Multicentric Series
by Angelo Porreca, Filippo Marino, Davide De Marchi, Marco Giampaoli, Francesca Simonetti, Antonio Amodeo, Paolo Corsi, Francesco Claps, Daniele Romagnoli, Alessandro Crestani and Luca Di Gianfrancesco
Cancers 2025, 17(16), 2645; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17162645 - 13 Aug 2025
Viewed by 1413
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the perioperative outcomes, functional impact, and oncologic efficacy of off-clamp robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) in patients with renal masses across multiple high-volume centers. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study including 563 patients (group 1) who underwent clampless [...] Read more.
Objective: To evaluate the perioperative outcomes, functional impact, and oncologic efficacy of off-clamp robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) in patients with renal masses across multiple high-volume centers. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study including 563 patients (group 1) who underwent clampless RAPN between January 2018 and December 2024. Patients with solitary kidneys, tumors >7 cm, or prior renal surgery were excluded. The standardized surgical technique involved tumor resection without clamping of the renal artery, followed by the use of hemostatic agents and standard/selective suturing of the resection bed on demand. Patients in group 1 were compared to 244 consecutive patients treated in the same centres and treated with RAPN with an on-clamp procedure (group 2). Primary outcomes included operative time, blood loss, and complications, while secondary outcomes assessed renal function preservation and oncologic control at an at least 12-month follow-up. Results: The median operative time was 118 min (IQR: 100–140 min), and median estimated blood loss was 150 mL (range: 50–400 mL). The overall complication rate was 9.2%, with most classified as Clavien–Dindo Grade I–II. No intraoperative conversions to open surgery were recorded. Renal function was well preserved, with a median estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline of 4.1% at three months (p > 0.05), and no cases of acute kidney injury. Oncologic outcomes were favorable, with a positive surgical margin rate (PSM) of 2.4% and two cases of tumor recurrences (0.36%) documented at a 12-month follow-up. Conclusions: The off-clamp RAPN is a safe and effective nephron-sparing approach, offering significant renal function preservation while maintaining oncologic efficacy. This technique minimizes ischemia–reperfusion injury and post-surgical fibrosis, providing a viable alternative to on-clamp RAPN. Further prospective trials are warranted to confirm long-term benefits and refine patient selection criteria. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 990 KB  
Review
Practical Strategies to Predict, Avoid and Manage the Complications of Robotic-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy
by Andrew R. H. Shepherd and Benjamin J. Challacombe
Complications 2025, 2(3), 21; https://doi.org/10.3390/complications2030021 - 8 Aug 2025
Viewed by 2225
Abstract
Background/objectives: Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is increasingly utilised for the management of renal masses, with the growing use of different robotic platforms and increasing complexity of renal masses managed robotically. Appropriate patient selection, the development of operative skills and experience and sensible surgical [...] Read more.
Background/objectives: Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is increasingly utilised for the management of renal masses, with the growing use of different robotic platforms and increasing complexity of renal masses managed robotically. Appropriate patient selection, the development of operative skills and experience and sensible surgical decision making are required to optimise the outcomes of RAPN and minimise the risk of complications. We provide a comprehensive review of strategies to predict, avoid and manage the complications of RAPN. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature review to outline many of the reported complications arising from RAPN, with a focus on preoperative considerations (patient selection, imaging, 3D modelling and predictive models), intraoperative considerations (positioning and kidney exposure complications) and practical management strategies to identify and manage the complications of this procedure. Results: Many complications of RAPN can be predicted, and we outline strategies to mitigate these risks through careful preparation prior to surgery, including descriptions of preventative strategies and important preoperative considerations. We also present a detailed outline of management for the most common complications of RAPN, including bleeding/haemorrhage, urine leak and intraoperative complications such as adjacent organ injuries. Conclusions: RAPN can be a challenging procedure with a significant risk of complications. Assiduous preoperative planning, thoughtful intraoperative decision making and the early recognition and management of complications are essential to optimise patient outcomes following RAPN. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 771 KB  
Article
The Anesthesiologic Impact of Single-Port Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: A Tertiary Referral Comparative Analysis Between Full-Flank Transperitoneal, Retroperitoneal, and Supine Lower Anterior Access (LAA)
by Luca Lambertini, Matteo Pacini, Paolo Polverino, Nikki R. Wilkinson, Ruben Sauer Calvo, Donato Cannoletta, Antony Angelo Pellegrino, Greta Pettenuzzo, Fabrizio Di Maida, Andrea Mari, Gabriele Bignante, Francesco Lasorsa, Alessandro Zucchi, Sergio Serni, Andrea Minervini, David B. Glick and Simone Crivellaro
J. Pers. Med. 2025, 15(7), 306; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15070306 - 11 Jul 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1373
Abstract
Objective: To explore the impact of supine retroperitoneal single-port robot-assisted partial nephrectomy with lower anterior access on perioperative ventilatory, cardiovascular, and pain-related outcomes compared to a cohort of patients treated with single-port robot-assisted retroperitoneal or transperitoneal partial nephrectomy with standard flank patient positioning. [...] Read more.
Objective: To explore the impact of supine retroperitoneal single-port robot-assisted partial nephrectomy with lower anterior access on perioperative ventilatory, cardiovascular, and pain-related outcomes compared to a cohort of patients treated with single-port robot-assisted retroperitoneal or transperitoneal partial nephrectomy with standard flank patient positioning. Materials and Methods: Clinical and surgical data of all consecutive patients treated with single-port robot-assisted partial nephrectomy between March 2019 and January 2024 were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. Specific same-day-discharge guidelines were applied to all cases. Failed same-day discharge was defined as the presence of early (<90 days) perioperative complications or the absence of opioid-free postoperative recovery. Results: Overall, 105 consecutive patients treated with single-port robot-assisted partial nephrectomy were analyzed. No differences emerged in baseline features. Peak inspiratory pressure and plateau pressure changes were significantly lower in the supine retroperitoneal lower anterior access group from the time of CO2 insufflation throughout every 30-min operative setpoint assessment (p = 0.02, p = 0.03, and p = 0.02, respectively). The transperitoneal group showed significantly higher values of mean, systolic, and diastolic blood pressure compared to retroperitoneal approaches. The supine lower anterior access group also showed significantly lower non-surgical operative room time, perioperative opioid administration, and postoperative median VAS pain score. Conclusions: The adoption of supine lower anterior access improved perioperative ventilatory, cardiovascular, and pain-related outcomes, also optimizing operating room efficiency. Further multicenter series with longer follow-ups are still needed to validate our preliminary results. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 2713 KB  
Article
Assessing Oncologic and Functional Outcomes of 3D Image-Guided Robotic-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy (3D-IGRAPN): A Prospective Study (UroCCR-186)
by Alice Pitout, Gaëlle Margue, Federico Rubat Baleuri, Abderrahmane Khaddad, Maxime Pattou, Franck Bladou, Grégoire Robert and Jean-Christophe Bernhard
Cancers 2025, 17(13), 2127; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17132127 - 25 Jun 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1003
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Three-dimensional (3D) image-guided robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (3D-IGRAPN) integrates patient-specific anatomical models to optimize surgical planning and intraoperative guidance in the management of renal tumors. This study aimed to assess medium-term functional and oncologic outcomes of 3D-IGRAPN in a large, prospective cohort. Methods: [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Three-dimensional (3D) image-guided robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (3D-IGRAPN) integrates patient-specific anatomical models to optimize surgical planning and intraoperative guidance in the management of renal tumors. This study aimed to assess medium-term functional and oncologic outcomes of 3D-IGRAPN in a large, prospective cohort. Methods: All consecutive patients undergoing 3D-IGRAPN between January 2016 and March 2023 at a tertiary referral center were prospectively included in the UroCCR database (NCT03293563). Patient-specific 3D models were generated from preoperative CT scans and used intraoperatively. The primary endpoint was trifecta achievement, defined as an absence of major complications (Clavien–Dindo ≥ 3), negative surgical margins for malignant tumors, and ≥90% preservation of baseline renal function at 3 months. Secondary endpoints included functional outcomes, complication rates, local recurrence, and metastasis rates, as well as cancer-specific and overall survivals. Results: Among 568 patients (586 surgeries), the trifecta was achieved in 55.2% of evaluable malignant cases. Severe complications occurred in 33 cases (5.6%), and positive surgical margins were reported in 27 cases (5.1%) out of 528 surgeries involving malignant lesions. Renal function was preserved in 59.9% of patients at 3 months. At a mean follow-up of 31.5 months, recurrence and metastasis rates were 7.4% and 8.6%, respectively. Cancer-specific and overall survival at follow-up were 96.5% and 89%. Conclusions: 3D-IGRAPN demonstrates favorable functional and oncologic outcomes, even in complex tumors. These results support the integration of 3D modeling as a standard tool in image-guided nephron-sparing surgery. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Research of Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 308 KB  
Article
Contemporary Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: Results from Two European Referral Institutions
by Francesco Barletta, Nicola Frego, Mario de Angelis, Stefano Resca, Marco Ticonosco, Enrico Vecchio, Sara Tamburini, Alessandro Pissavini, Andrea Noya Mourullo, Bin K. Kroon, Geert Smits, Bernke Papenburg, Edward Lambert, Frederick D’Hondt, Ruben De Groote, Peter Schatteman, Alexandre Mottrie and Geert De Naeyer
Cancers 2025, 17(13), 2104; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17132104 - 23 Jun 2025
Viewed by 1295
Abstract
Introduction: Available guidelines recommend performing nephron-sparing surgery in selected renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients. Many studies provided robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) functional and oncological outcomes, with most of these including a wide timespan and a number of surgeons with different experiences, which might [...] Read more.
Introduction: Available guidelines recommend performing nephron-sparing surgery in selected renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients. Many studies provided robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) functional and oncological outcomes, with most of these including a wide timespan and a number of surgeons with different experiences, which might lead to the heterogeneity of the results. In this study, we aim to provide a contemporary report of RAPN patient outcomes performed at two referral centers by experienced surgeons. Materials and Methods: Overall, 333 RAPN patients treated at two European referral centers between 2019 and 2021 were identified. Continuous and categorical variables were reported using medians and proportions. Multi-variable logistic regression (MLR) models were fitted to test predictors of off-clamp technique use and trifecta achievement. Results: The median age was 65 (IQR: 57–73) years. The clinical stage distribution was as follows: 224 (67%) cT1a vs. 89 (26%) cT1b vs. 20 cT2 (7%). The median warm ischemia time was 14 (10–18) minutes, with trifecta being achieved in 74% (n = 240) of patients. In MLR models predicting off-clamp surgery, an increasing R.E.N.A.L. score was independently associated with a lower chance of attempting such a technique (OR: 0.69, p-value < 0.001). In models predicting trifecta achievement, both a higher R.E.N.A.L. score (OR: 0.78, p-value = 0.007) and the presence of multiple lesions (OR: 0.29, p-value = 0.007) were independently associated with lower chances of reaching the outcome. Significant upstaging of chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage was recorded in 9.4% of patients after one year of follow-up. Conclusions: We reported the contemporary outcomes of patients treated with RAPN by highly experienced surgeons from two referral centers. This report represents a valid benchmark that could be used for individual patient counseling in the decision-making process. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Treatment and Prognostic Factors of Urologic Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop