Search Results (9)

Background/Objectives: A significantly higher fracture risk characterizes Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients when compared to the non-diabetic population, even though their average bone mineral density (BMD) tends to be normal or high. This elevated risk is primarily driven by defective bone quality. The trabecular bone score (TBS) and radiofrequency echographic multispectrometry (REMS) have recently been proposed to improve the assessment of bone quality in T2DM individuals. This study aimed to evaluate whether TBS and REMS can improve the identification of osteoporosis and fracture risk in these patients. Methods: BMD was measured in 223 consecutive T2DM patients (126 women and 97 man) and 102 controls. BMD values for the lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN), and total hip (TH) were obtained via both dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and radiofrequency echographic multi-spectrometry (REMS). In all patients, TBS and Fragility Score (FS) by REMS were measured and prior major osteoporotic fractures (MOF) were assessed. Results: All BMD T-scores measured by REMS were significantly lower than those obtained by DXA at both lumbar and femoral sites. T2DM patients with previous MOF exhibited lower T-scores for both BMD-LS and BMD-TH, as assessed by DXA and REMS, compared with patients without fractures. However, these differences reached statistical significance for BMD-TH with both techniques and for BMD-LS with REMS, but not for BMD-LS with DXA. Moreover, patients with a history of MOF had significantly lower TBS values (p < 0.05) and significantly higher FS values at both lumbar (p < 0.05) and femoral (p < 0.01) sites compared with those without fractures. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that the parameters obtained using REMS technology (BMD and FS) may be valuable tools for improving the diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessing fracture risk in patients with T2DM. Full article

Abstract: Objectives: Bone mineral density (BMD) variation under vitamin D supplementation, determined using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), is the gold standard and the main tool used in most studies in this domain. However, the scientific literature is lacking with regard to the usefulness of REMS in BMD follow-up, especially the importance of the fragility score (FS). The main objective of this study was to determine whether FS follow-up is relevant in a group of patients with axial spondyloarthritis and whether REMS could have clinical applicability. Methods: Patients with a certain diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA) were recruited from two medical healthcare centers and were scanned using Radiofrequency Echographic Multi-Spectrometry in order to obtain their fragility score (FS), an objective measurement of bone quality. The main group was randomized into a vitamin D supplementation branch and a non-supplementation branch and followed up every 6 months for 18 months in total. Comparisons between the branches were made using MiniTab v.20 statistical software. Results: Lower FS values were obtained in patients who initially had high scores, suggesting a positive impact of vitamin D on bone quality (p = 0.008). Muscle strength was evaluated through a visual analogue scale (VAS), with improvements being seen in the supplementation branch (p < 0.005). Furthermore, although some patients had experienced falls in previous years, during the study period, no new events were recorded in either group. Conclusions: The FS is a reliable tool for evaluating bone architecture and is useful in everyday practice for the management of patients taking vitamin D supplements. Full article

Background/Objectives: Radiofrequency echographic multispectrometry (REMS) technology has emerged as a promising alternative for osteoporosis diagnosis. This non-ionising, portable and accessible method enables early detection of osteoporosis in primary healthcare settings. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of REMS in evaluating osteoporosis within primary healthcare. Methods: Bone mineral density was assessed in 86 participants trough 172 scans of the lumbar spine and femur, using REMS technology in two Portuguese primary healthcare units in Guarda. Results: In the lumbar spine evaluation, 51.2% of the participants had osteopenia and 31.4% osteoporosis; in the femur evaluation, 43.0% had osteopenia and 34.9% osteoporosis. The data indicated a significant prevalence of bone fragility. The bone mineral density estimated by radiofrequency echographic multispectrometry showed good agreement with the clinical diagnosis, suggesting that this technology is effective in the early detection of osteoporosis. Conclusions: Bone densitometry using REMS method, performed by a radiographer in primary healthcare settings, offers a viable and innovative alternative for the effective detection of osteoporosis and osteopenia. Full article

Background: This study aimed to investigate the impact of physical performance of geriatric women on their fracture risk and bone mineral density (BMD) assessed with radiofrequency echographic multispectrometry (REMS). Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study to assess the physical performance, BMD and fracture risk in 182 geriatric women aged 60 years and older. BMD was measured using REMS scanning (developed by Echolight S. p. a., Lecce, Italy), and the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) was utilized to estimate fracture risk. Physical performance was assessed using hand grip strength (HGS), Timed Up and Go (TUG), Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test (5XSST) and Flamingo test. Results: The mean HGS of both hands differed significantly between the groups with normal BMD, osteopenia and osteoporosis measured at the lumbar spine and hip. The mean TUG time of the subjects with osteoporosis was significantly higher (13.77 s) than those with osteopenia (7.14 s) and normal BMD (6.05 s) of the hip (p = 0.024). The mean 5XSST time of the subjects with normal BMD (8.86 s) was lower than those with osteopenia (9.30 s) and osteoporosis (13.6 s) of the hip (p = 0.012). Conclusions: This study revealed strong associations between physical performance and fracture risk. Rehabilitation programs focused on strength and mobility may be essential for fracture prevention. Full article

Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) in the lumbar spine can potentially lead to an overestimation of bone mineral density (BMD), and this can be a challenge in accurately diagnosing conditions like osteoporosis, where precise measurement of BMD is crucial. Radiofrequency Echographic Multi Spectrometry (REMS) is being recognized as an innovative diagnostic tool for assessing bone status. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the use of REMS may enhance the identification of osteoporosis in patients with osteoarthritis. Methods: A cohort of 500 patients (mean age: 63.9 ± 11.2 years) diagnosed with osteoarthritis and having a medical prescription for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) were recruited for the study. All patients underwent BMD measurements at lumbar spine and femoral sites by both DXA and REMS techniques. Results: The T-score values for BMD at the lumbar spine (BMD-LS) by DXA were significantly higher with respect to BMD-LS by REMS across all OA severity scores, and the differences were more pronounced in patients with a higher degree of OA severity (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the percentage of subjects classified as “osteoporotic”, on the basis of BMD by REMS was markedly higher than those classified by DXA, both when considering all skeletal sites (39.4% vs. 15.1%, respectively) and the lumbar spine alone (30.5% vs. 6.0%, respectively). A similar pattern was observed when OA patients were grouped according to the Kellgren–Lawrence grading score. Conclusions: The findings from our study indicate that, in a population with varying severity levels of osteoarthritis, REMS demonstrated a higher capability to diagnose osteoporosis compared to DXA, and this could lead to earlier intervention and improved outcomes for patients with bone fragility, reducing the likelihood of fractures and associated complications. Full article

Radiofrequency echographic multi-spectrometry (REMS) is an ultrasound technique that has been recently introduced in the medical field to detect osteoporosis and fracture risk at axial sites. The use of sonography to visualize the region of interest (ROI) of the hip neck provides the opportunity to identify occult fractures. A 91-year-old woman with persistent right leg pain was referred to rheumatologist due to a known history of arthritis and osteoporosis. She was able to walk using a crutch, although experiencing an antalgic gait. The patient had recently fallen on her right side from standing height. During the visualization of the ROI of the right femoral neck using REMS, an abrupt break of the femoral cortex suspected to be a fracture was seen; therefore, the measurement of the femoral neck was performed on the left side. The T-score had value of −2.9 SD and the fragility score was 86.7. Due to unclear signs of a fracture after an X-ray of the hip, a computed tomography (CT) exam of the hip was performed, which revealed a femoral neck fracture. Occult fractures of the femoral neck are challenging to diagnose and require numerous radiologic exams. The use of ultrasound as a method to measure bone density allows the simultaneous diagnosis of osteoporosis and detection of fractures. Full article

This study aimed to estimate the utility of the Radiofrequency Echographic Multispectrometry (REMS) approach in the assessment of bone mineral density (BMD) in subjects with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI). In 41 subjects (40.5 ± 18.7 years) with OI and in 36 healthy controls, we measured BMD at the lumbar spine (LS-BMD), femoral neck (FN-BMD) and total hip (TH-BMD), employing a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry tool. Additionally, REMS scans were also performed at the lumbar and femoral sites. The presence and number of reported fractures were assessed in the study population. Patients characterized by a history of fragility fractures represented 84.5% of the study population. OI subjects showed significantly reduced BMD values both at the level of the lumbar spine and the femoral subregions (p < 0.01) compared to healthy controls when performed using both the DXA and the REMS method. Dividing OI patients on the basis of the Sillence classification, no differences were found between the LS-BMD values carried out using the DXA technique between the OI type I group and OI Type III and IV groups. On the contrary, the OI Type III and IV groups presented significantly lower values of both Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) and LS-BMD through REMS with respect to OI type I patients (p < 0.05). Based on the data of this study, it is possible to conclude that even the new REMS assessment, which does not use ionizing radiation, represents an excellent method for studying the bone status in subjects affected by OI. Full article

To determine the short-term intra-operator precision and inter-operator repeatability of radiofrequency echographic multi-spectrometry (REMS) at the lumbar spine (LS) and proximal femur (FEM). All patients underwent an ultrasound scan of the LS and FEM. Both precision and repeatability, expressed as root-mean-square coefficient of variation (RMS-CV) and least significant change (LSC) were obtained using data from two consecutive REMS acquisitions by the same operator or two different operators, respectively. The precision was also assessed in the cohort stratified according to BMI classification. The mean (±SD) age of our subjects was 48.9 ± 6.8 for LS and 48.3 ± 6.1 for FEM. Precision was assessed on 42 subjects at LS and 37 subjects on FEM. Mean (±SD) BMI was 24.71 ± 4.2 for LS and 25.0 ± 4.84 for FEM. Respectively, the intra-operator precision error (RMS-CV) and LSC resulted in 0.47% and 1.29% at the spine and 0.32% and 0.89% at the proximal femur evaluation. The inter-operator variability investigated at the LS yielded an RMS-CV error of 0.55% and LSC of 1.52%, whereas for the FEM, the RMS-CV was 0.51% and the LSC was 1.40%. Similar values were found when subjects were divided into BMI subgroups. REMS technique provides a precise estimation of the US-BMD independent of subjects’ BMI differences. Full article

We aimed to investigate the reproducibility and accuracy of Radiofrequency Echographic Multi-Spectrometry (REMS) for femoral BMD estimation and the reproducibility and discriminative power of the REMS-derived femoral fragility score. 175 patients with primary and disuse-related osteoporosis were recruited: one femoral Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) scan and two femoral REMS scans were acquired. No significant test—retest differences were observed for all REMS-derived variables. The diagnostic concordance between DXA and REMS was 63% (Cohen’s kappa = 0.31) in patients with primary osteoporosis and 13% (Cohen’s kappa: −0.04) in patients with disuse-related osteoporosis. No significant difference was observed between REMS and DXA for either femoral neck BMD (mean difference between REMS and DXA: −0.015 g/cm²) or total femur BMD (mean difference: −0.004 g/cm²) in patients with primary osteoporosis. Significant differences between the two techniques were observed in patients with disuse-related osteoporosis (femoral neck BMD difference: 0.136 g/cm²; total femur BMD difference: 0.236 g/cm²). Statistically significant differences in the fragility score were obtained between the fractured and non-fractured patients for both populations. In conclusion, REMS showed excellent test-retest reproducibility, but the diagnostic concordance between DXA and REMS was between minimal and poor. Further studies are required to improve the REMS—derived estimation of femoral BMD. Full article