Search Results (224)

Background/Objectives: Sarcopenia is defined by the progressive loss of muscle mass, strength, and/or physical performance associated with aging. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the medial branch nerves is a well-established and effective treatment for lumbar facetogenic pain. While sarcopenia is associated with poor outcomes following epidural steroid injections and lumbar spine surgeries, its impact on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing RFA for facetogenic pain remains unexplored. This study aims to evaluate the influence of sarcopenia on treatment outcomes in this patient cohort. Methods: Patients were classified into sarcopenia (n = 35) and non-sarcopenia groups (n = 67) based on predefined psoas muscle index (PMI) thresholds. The primary outcomes included changes in back pain intensity and the proportion of responders at 1, 3, and 6 months following RFA. The secondary outcome was to identify demographic, clinical, and sarcopenia-related factors predictive of treatment response at each follow-up interval. Results: Both groups demonstrated statistically significant improvements in pain scores compared to baseline at all follow-up points. However, the median pain scores at 3 months post-RFA remained significantly higher in the sarcopenia group. Despite this, the proportion of responders did not differ significantly between the two groups at any time point. At 3 months, the absence of prior spinal surgery was identified as a significant predictor of treatment response. At 6 months, favorable outcomes were significantly associated with the absence of diabetes, no history of spinal surgery, and a higher PMI. Conclusions: Sarcopenia may influence the extent of pain improvement following medial branch nerve RFA. Additionally, patient-specific factors, such as diabetes, prior spinal surgery, and PMI, should be considered when predicting treatment outcomes. Full article

Despite advances in surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation treatments for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), 5-year survival rates remain at nearly 11%. Cholangiocarcinoma, while not as severe, also possesses similar survival rates. Fewer than 20% of patients are surgical candidates at time of diagnosis; therefore, it is imperative that alternative therapies are effective for non-surgical patients. There are several thermal ablative techniques, including radiofrequency ablation (RFA), high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), microwave ablation (MWA), alcohol ablation, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), cryoablation, irreversible electroporation (IRE), biliary intraluminal brachytherapy, and biliary photodynamic therapy (PDT). Emerging literature in animal models and human patients has demonstrated that endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided RFA (EUS-RFA) prevents tumor progression through coagulative necrosis, protein denaturation, and activation of anticancer immunity in local and distant tumor tissue (abscopal effect). RFA treatment has been shown to not only reduce tumor-associated immunosuppressive cells but also increase functional T cells in distant tumor cells not treated with RFA. The remarkable ability to reduce tumor progression and promote tumor microenvironment (TME) remodeling makes RFA a very promising non-surgical therapy technique that has the potential to reduce mortality in this patient population. EUS-RFA offers superior precision and safety compared to other ablation techniques for pancreatic and biliary cancers, due to real-time imaging capabilities and minimally invasive nature. Future research should focus on optimizing RFA protocols, exploring combination therapies with chemotherapy or immunotherapy, and expanding its use in patients with metastatic disease. This review article will explore the current data and underlying pathophysiology of EUS-RFA while also highlighting the role of ablative therapies as a whole in immune activation response. Full article

Background: Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) is a rare pancreatic tumor with malignant potential. Its diagnosis has grown alongside increased use of abdominal imaging. SPN is suspected after classical findings in abdominal imaging studies; however, endoscopic ultrasound-guided (EUS) fine needle aspiration can support preoperative diagnosis. The treatment of choice is still surgical intervention, with an intent to reach curative resection. The prognosis is excellent. Recently, emerging data on EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) suggest changing the choice of treatment for small SPN. Methods: We provide a comprehensive overview on pancreatic SPN with a focus on treatment, adverse events, recurrence rate, and outcomes. In addition, we provide a literature summary and pool data analysis. Results: Overall, 70 papers including 6651 patients were identified. The mean SPN size was 5.8 cm, metastasis rate was 1.9%, and recurrence rate was 3%. Moreover, the mortality rate was low at 0.2%, although high postoperative adverse events were reported (32.4%). Small SPN (<2 cm) was present in 4.1% of the studies. Two studies reported EUS-RFA for small SPN <2 cm, without recurrence at a median follow-up of 18.5 months. Conclusions: SPN still necessitates surgical intervention given its malignant potential. However, EUS-RFA can represent a promising and safe therapeutic option for SPN < 2 cm. Full article

Postamputation pain (PAP), including residual limb pain (RLP) and phantom limb pain (PLP), remains a significant and debilitating complication after limb loss. Despite advances in pharmacological management, many patients experience inadequate pain relief, underscoring the need for alternative therapeutic strategies. Objective: This narrative review critically synthesizes current interventional therapies for PAP, focusing on mechanisms, clinical efficacy and practical application. Methods: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and Web of Science databases for studies published between 2015 and 2025. Relevant articles on peripheral nerve interventions as well as different neuromodulation techniques were included. Results: Peripheral interventions (such as alcohol neurolysis, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and cryoneurolysis (CNL)) and neuromodulation techniques (including spinal cord stimulation (SCS), dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation and cauda equina stimulation (CES)) demonstrate promising outcomes for PAP. Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) shows favorable safety and efficacy profiles and may help prevent the chronification of pain. Conclusions: Contemporary interventional therapies represent valuable options in the multidisciplinary management of PAP. Nevertheless, further research is required to standardize clinical algorithms, optimize therapeutic decision-making and improve long-term outcomes and quality of life for individuals with PAP. Full article

Background and Objectives: Percutaneous liver radiofrequency ablation (RFA) under monitored anesthesia care (MAC) carries a risk of hypoxia due to respiratory depression. Ensuring adequate oxygenation during such procedures is essential for patient safety. This study aimed to evaluate whether a high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) improves oxygenation compared to a simple facemask during RFA. Materials and Methods: In this prospective, randomized controlled trial, 51 patients undergoing ultrasound-guided RFA under MAC were allocated to receive oxygen via an HFNC (30 L/min) or a facemask (6 L/min). Arterial blood gases were collected at the baseline and 5 min after oxygenation. The primary outcome was the arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO₂). Secondary outcomes included hypoxia incidence (SpO₂ < 95%), the difference in the ratio of the arterial partial pressure of oxygen to the fraction of inspired oxygen concentration (ΔP/F ratio), the difference in the arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (ΔPaCO₂), respiratory rate (RR) changes, and patient satisfaction. Results: After adjustment for the baseline PaO₂, the HFNC group showed significantly higher intra-procedural PaO₂ compared to the facemask group (299 ± 18.6 vs. 194 ± 19.0 mmHg, p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in the ΔP/F ratio, ΔPaCO₂, or patient satisfaction. Among the secondary outcomes, RR was more stable in the HFNC group throughout the procedure (Group × Time interaction, p = 0.003). Conclusions: The HFNC significantly improved intra-procedural PaO₂ during RFA under MAC but did not reduce hypoxia incidence or improve other clinical outcomes compared to facemask oxygenation. The stability of RR observed with the HFNC may reflect a physiological advantage, though further studies are needed to determine its clinical relevance. Full article

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the most challenging malignancies to treat, largely due to late diagnosis, limited surgical options, and profound resistance to systemic therapies, all of which contribute to a five-year survival rate of approximately 9%. The dense, hypoxic, and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) of PDAC plays a critical role in immune evasion and therapeutic failure. As conventional immunotherapies have shown limited efficacy in PDAC, attention has shifted toward local interventions capable of remodeling the TME to enhance immune responsiveness. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided ablative therapies have emerged as promising strategies to overcome these barriers. A range of modalities—including irreversible electroporation, microwave ablation, photodynamic therapy, and cryoablation—are under investigation. Among these, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) stands out as the most promising therapy as it not only induces direct tumor cytoreduction but also promotes antigen release, triggers immunogenic cell death, and may work synergistically with systemic therapies such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and adenosine pathway blockade. This review aims to explore the evolving role of endoscopic ablative therapies with a focus on RFA as a potential platform for immune activation in pancreatic cancer. Full article

Background: Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) are relatively rare neoplasms with heterogeneous behavior, ranging from indolent to aggressive disease. The evolution of nuclear medicine has allowed the development of an efficient and advanced toolkit for the diagnosis and treatment of PanNETs. Case: A 45-year-old woman was diagnosed with a grade 1 PanNET and multiple liver metastases. She underwent distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy, extended liver resection, and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Surgical planning was guided by [^99mTc]Tc-EDDA/HYNIC-TOC SPECT/CT (single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography) and preoperative [^99mTc]Tc-mebrofenin-based functional liver volumetry. Functional liver volumetry based on dynamic [^99mTc]Tc-mebrofenin SPECT/CT facilitated precise surgical planning and reliable assessment of the efficacy of parenchymal modulation, thereby aiding in the prevention of post-hepatectomy liver failure. Liver fibrosis was non-invasively evaluated using two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE). Tumor progression was monitored using somatostatin receptor scintigraphy, chromogranin A, and contrast-enhanced CT. Recurrent disease was treated with somatostatin analogues (SSAs) and [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). Despite progression to grade 3 disease (Ki-67 from 1% to 30%), the patient remains alive 53 months post-diagnosis, in complete remission, with an ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) status of 0. Conclusions: Functional imaging played a pivotal role in guiding therapeutic decisions throughout the disease course. This case not only underscores the clinical utility of advanced nuclear imaging but also illustrates the dynamic nature of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. The transition from low-grade to high-grade disease highlights the need for further studies on tumor progression mechanisms and the potential role of adjuvant therapies in managing PanNETs. Full article

Background: Chronic thoracic pain is commonly caused by thoracic facet dysfunction, intercostal neuralgia, surgery, or thoracic pain secondary to cancer and is present in approximately 15% of the population. Conventional treatments, including pharmacotherapy and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, are often ineffective and are often associated with poorly tolerated adverse effects. Cooled radiofrequency ablation (c-RFA) is a minimally invasive procedure that uses radiofrequency energy delivered through a probe to lesion the targeted nerve and provide significant and lasting relief. Methods: This study was a retrospective analysis of data extracted from UW-Health Electronic Medical Health records from October 2015 through June 2024. Patient data were collected, including diagnosis, pre-operative pain score, post-operative pain score, duration of relief, age, sex, and BMI. A two-tailed paired t-test was used to analyze the pre-operative and post-operative pain scores. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: A total of 111 thoracic c-RFA procedures were reviewed; 43 were excluded due to absent pre-operative or post-operative pain scores in medical records. A total of 68 procedures were included in the analysis, comprising 55 patients: 25 females and 30 males with an average age of 51.31 ± 18.22 years and a BMI of 29.79 ± 6.48 kg/m². Improvement in pain scores was reported in 77.94% (n = 53), 16.18% (n = 11) reported no change, and 5.88% (n = 4) reported worsening pain. Patients reported an average pre-operative pain score of 5.98 (M = 5.98, SD = 1.91) and an average post-operative pain score of 3.06 (M = 3.06, SD = 2.52); this achieved significance (p < 0.0001). Of the 77.94% (n = 53) charts that noted improvement, there is an average of 62.83 ± 28.48% reduction from their pre-operative pain scores. The average duration of relief lasted 11.85 ± 13.42 months. Conclusions: This study supports the efficacy and safety of c-RFA as a minimally invasive therapy for chronic thoracic pain refractory to conservative measures. Full article

Background: Frequent premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) are associated with adverse outcomes in patients with structural heart disease (SHD), including increased risk of mortality and impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). While radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of idiopathic PVCs is well established, its role in patients with SHD remains less clear. Objective: To review the evidence on the efficacy of RFA for PVC suppression in patients with SHD, specifically evaluating its impact on LVEF and clinical outcomes. Methods: A review of the literature was conducted using PubMed and the Cochrane Library, focusing on studies published after 2010 that included adult patients with SHD and a PVC burden >4% on 24 h Holter monitoring. Studies including patients with presumed PVC-induced cardiomyopathy without underlying SHD were excluded. Key outcomes were LVEF recovery, functional status, and procedural success rates. Results: In ischemic cardiomyopathy, RFA reduced PVC burden significantly and resulted in modest but significant LVEF improvement. In non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, successful ablation improved LVEF by 8–12% on average and enhanced NYHA class. Across mixed cohorts, patients with sustained PVC suppression showed significant improvements in LVEF, functional status, which, in many cases, removed the indication for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Notably, procedural success rates ranged from 60 to 94%, and the high baseline PVC burden (>13–20%) consistently predicted LVEF recovery regardless of SHD etiology. Conclusions: RFA of frequent PVCs in patients with SHD leads to meaningful improvements in systolic function and symptoms, particularly in those with high PVC burden. These benefits are seen across ischemic and non-ischemic substrates, although procedural complexity and recurrence rates may be higher. PVC burden, rather than SHD presence alone, should guide patient selection for ablation. Full article

Introduction: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the genicular nerve is an increasingly common treatment for chronic knee pain, refractory to conservative measures. However, RFA often provides significant but temporary relief, and patients return for repeat RFAs for the treatment of their pain. This study investigates the efficacy of repeat RFAs compared to the initial RFA for patients who receive repeat RFAs for chronic knee pain. Methods: This study is a retrospective chart review and analysis that was conducted between 2015 and 2023. Groups were determined by the number of RFA procedures that patients received, and a one-tailed ANOVA test was performed to assess the statistical significance of the initial RFA and the three repeat RFA groups. A one-way ANOVA was performed to analyze statistical differences between percent improvement, preoperative pain scores, and the duration of improvement using the visual analog scale (VAS). A p-value of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. A paired two-tailed T-test was carried out, individually comparing the initial RFA to the three repeat groups for percent improvement. A paired t-test was also carried out to compare initial and first repeat RFAs for preoperative pain score and duration of improvement. Results: A total of 42 patients underwent repeat RFA procedures, with 8 receiving bilateral treatments, totaling 50 knees and 116 procedures. The original RFA group demonstrated a mean percent improvement of 75% ± 25% (mean ± SD) and a duration of improvement of 9.46 ± 5.45 months. The first repeat group had a mean percent improvement of 66% ± 29% and a duration of improvement of 8.77 ± 7.32 months. The second repeat group had a mean percent improvement of 67% ± 24% and a duration of improvement of 10.00 ± 2.45 months. The third repeat group had a mean percent improvement of 85% ± 20% and a duration of improvement of 4.00 months. ANOVA revealed no statistically significant differences among the groups in preoperative scores (p = 0.40), percent improvement (p = 0.25), or duration of improvement (p = 0.79). Paired t-tests showed a significant decrease in percent improvement in the first repeat RFA compared to the original RFA (p = 0.04), but no significant differences were observed in preoperative scores (p = 0.057) or duration of improvement (p = 0.175). No significant differences were found in percent improvement via paired T-test between the original RFA and the second (p = 0.75) or third repeats (p = 0.21). Conclusions: The repeat RFA of genicular nerves retains a clinically significant level of pain reduction for chronic knee pain. However, this study demonstrated decreased pain relief following the first repeat RFA compared to the initial RFA when analyzing individual knees sequentially via a paired T-test. An analysis of initial, first, second, and third repeat groups via ANOVA showed no difference in percent improvement, duration of pain relief, or preoperative pain scores. Full article

Background/Objectives: The degree of vascularization of myomas plays an important role in both diagnosis and the selection of appropriate treatment. This is particularly relevant for minimally invasive therapies such as uterine artery embolization (UAE), high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), or radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in uterine myomas, as their effectiveness is highest in well-vascularized lesions. This study aimed to analyze the perfusion of uterine myomas using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and to develop a new quantitative classification of lesion vascularization, referencing the Funaki classification. Methods: The study included 56 female patients. Three parameters were determined for each lesion: the maximum signal enhancement (Ratio), time to peak, and mean signal intensity (Mean). A KMeans cluster analysis (k = 3) was performed, dividing the data into three groups corresponding to Funaki types I–III. Results: Significant differences were observed between the groups. Type III myomas were found only in older patients, which may be relevant when qualifying patients for vascularization-targeted therapies such as HIFU or radiofrequency ablation. Conclusions: The proposed classification may serve as a basis for automating the assessment of myomas and supporting clinical decision-making. Full article

Background/Objectives: The image guidance of choice for the combination therapy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and vertebral augmentation (VA) in the context of vertebral disease from spinal metastases are fluoroscopy and computer tomography (CT). Here, we aimed to assess the roles of both imaging modalities and if adoption of either would influence clinical outcomes of pain, physical function, and quality of life (QoL). RFA has been favored as a minimally invasive option for managing painful spinal metastases, and it is often coupled with VA to treat underlying osseous structural instability. This combination therapy of RFA with VA, which could be performed under CT or fluoroscopy, has in recent years been recognized as highly successful for pain control and functional restoration of metastatic spine lesions. Methods: Our scoping review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). The databases accessed were Medline and Embase, and the time frame of the search was set from database inception to 2 January 2025. The inclusion eligibility included primary research studies utilizing clearly defined imaging modalities of interest with measurable clinical end points of pain, quality of life (QoL), analgesic use, or complications. Results: Twenty-two articles were identified after screening fifty-eight papers using the databases. Fluoroscopy alone was the more frequently adopted imaging modality (n = 17/22, 77.3%). Almost all of the papers, regardless of the imaging modality used, consistently demonstrated reduction in pain, improvement in QoL, as well as a decrease in analgesia use. Complications were present but had minimal clinical implications, aside from a single article which appeared to demonstrate significantly higher cement leak rates with a singular case of resultant paraplegia. Conclusions: Fluoroscopy- and CT-guided RFA with VA have both proven to be efficacious in reducing patient discomfort and improving functionality while keeping risks of permanent neurological injuries to a minimum. Full article

Background/Objectives: Pancreatic neoplasms, including adenocarcinoma, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs), intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs), and high-grade cystic lesions, often require surgical resection as a form of curative treatment. However, comorbidities and high-risk features may preclude surgery. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative with proven cytoreductive efficacy in solid tumors. This case series evaluates the safety and efficacy of EUS-RFA in patients with various unresectable, non-metastatic pancreatic neoplasms. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on eight patients who underwent EUS-RFA at our institutions between July 2021 and February 2025. All patients were deemed unsuitable surgical candidates due to comorbidities such as advanced age, cardiovascular disease, renal insufficiency, and COPD or due to patient resistance to surgical intervention. EUS-RFA was performed using a 19-gauge RFA needle (Taewoong Corporation). Follow-up imaging was conducted 3 to 6 months after the completion of RFA treatment. Results: All eight patients demonstrated a good to excellent response in terms of tumor size reduction. The most notable response was observed in a patient with pNET, resulting in complete resolution from 15.6 × 12.0 mm to 0.0 × 0.0 mm after two RFA treatments. Other neoplasms, including pancreatic adenocarcinoma and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs), also demonstrated significant reductions. Mild post-procedure complications, including pancreatitis and abdominal pain, were noted in three cases. Conclusions: EUS-RFA is a promising alternative for managing unresectable pancreatic neoplasms in high-risk patients. Our findings support its use across various tumor types with favorable outcomes and minimal complications, reinforcing its role in expanding therapeutic options beyond surgery. Full article

Stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are common ablative techniques for lung metastases. A retrospective review of all patients treated with either modality at a single institution between 2011 and 2019 was conducted. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared. Local and distant progression, and overall survival were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Univariable analysis was carried out using Cox regression; this was followed by multivariable modelling. In total, 106 patients treated with RFA and 70 treated with SBRT were identified. Tumours treated with SBRT were larger (median size 18 mm vs. 11 mm) and primarily oligometastatic (91.4% vs. 20%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.5 months for SBRT and 7.9 months for RFA (p = 0.009). Median OS was similar (p = 0.66). In multivariable analysis, lesion size > 20 mm was predictive of adverse local PFS (p = 0.001), PFS (p = 0.0034) and OS (p = 0.001). A statistically significant interaction effect suggested that RFA was associated with better local PFS within colorectal primary patients (p = 0.035). This study highlights differences in patient selection and outcomes for RFA or SBRT in the treatment of lung metastases at our institution. Future studies for SBRT should focus on the optimum dose schedules required for different histologies. For less-radiosensitive tumours, RFA may offer a superior alternative where dose-escalated SBRT is not possible. Full article

Objective: The American Urological Association recommends ablation as an alternative treatment option for T1a RCC smaller than 3 cm. Our objective is to describe our technique and evaluate the outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for biopsy-proven T1a RCC measuring 3–4 cm, compared to outcomes for tumors <3 cm. Materials and Methods: A single-center, retrospective review included patients with solitary, de novo, biopsy-proven T1a RCC who underwent RFA between January 2001 and December 2020. Using propensity score matching, patients with 3–4 cm lesions (Group A) were matched with patients with lesions less than 3 cm (Group B) based on the pathology, grade, duration of follow-up, another primary malignancy, age, and sex. Survival outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan and Meier product-limit estimator, and both groups were compared. Results: A total of 122 patients were included in the matched analyses. Eight patients were missing data on disease recurrence, leaving 114 patients with data on RFS and DFS (55 patients in Group A and 59 patients in Group B). The median tumor size in groups A and B was 3.3 cm and 2.2 cm, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the complication rate (p = 0.11) and local recurrence at the ablation site (p = 0.15). There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival (p = 0.93), recurrence-free survival (p = 0.45), or disease-free survival (p = 0.37). The metastasis-free survival and cancer-specific survival were 100% in both groups. Conclusions: RFA is a highly effective modality for the treatment of 3–4 cm T1a RCC, with long-term favorable oncologic and survival outcomes. Full article