Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (56)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = proximal humeral fracture

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
11 pages, 764 KiB  
Article
Subscapularis CT-Scan Evaluation in Patients with Proximal Humerus Fracture: Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Versus Hemi-Arthroplasty
by Edoardo Gaj, Andrea Redler, Alessandro Maggiori, Susanna Pagnotta, Natale Criseo, Vikranth Mirle, Matthew Daggett and Angelo De Carli
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(15), 5257; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155257 - 24 Jul 2025
Viewed by 342
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Hemiarthroplasty (HA) and Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (RTSA) are both reliable treatment options for complex proximal humerus fractures. The role of the subscapularis tendon is well-defined in HA, whereas it plays a controversial role in RTSA. The purpose of our study [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Hemiarthroplasty (HA) and Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (RTSA) are both reliable treatment options for complex proximal humerus fractures. The role of the subscapularis tendon is well-defined in HA, whereas it plays a controversial role in RTSA. The purpose of our study is to evaluate its role in patients with proximal humerus fractures treated with HA and RTSA and investigate its association with clinical outcomes. Methods: Sixty-eight consecutive patients with proximal humeral fracture were prospectively enrolled into the study from June 2015 to May 2020 (RTSA = 36; HA = 32). Pre- and postoperative shoulder CT scans were performed to measure the subscapularis muscle cross-sectional area (SMCSA) and the supraspinatus fossa cross-sectional area (SFCSA). The SMCSA/SFCSA ratio was employed to normalize measurements against individual patient anatomy. Patient reported outcomes (PROs) and range of motion (ROM) were evaluated at the final follow-up. Results: The RTSA group demonstrated superior patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and range of motion (ROM) compared to the HA group. Notably, the Constant Score was significantly higher in the RTSA group (58.00 vs. 38.50; p = 0.0001), as well as forward flexion (147.50° vs. 90.00°; p < 0.0001). A postoperative reduction in subscapularis size of >35% occurred more frequently in RTSA patients (55.6%) than in HA patients (25%) (p = 0.01). The loss of subscapularis surface was greater in the RTSA patients (p = 0.018). Conclusions: RTSA demonstrated better results compared to HA, providing better ROM and PROs. Postoperative reduction in subscapularis size was significantly higher in RTSA compared to HA. Subscapularis condition seems to show no correlation with functional outcome in RTSA. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Orthopedics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

6 pages, 2009 KiB  
Case Report
A Longitudinal Peri-Implant Diaphyseal Fracture Around a Locked Humeral Nail: A Case Report
by Ana del Potro Jareño, Alfonso González Menocal, Ana Antonia Couceiro Laredo, Laura Conde Ruiz and Daniel López Dorado
Reports 2025, 8(2), 89; https://doi.org/10.3390/reports8020089 - 5 Jun 2025
Viewed by 511
Abstract
Background and Clinical Significance: Non-prosthetic peri-implant fractures (NPPIFs) are rare injuries occurring around internal fixation devices, and are distinct from periprosthetic fractures. While most studies focus on the femur, humeral NPPIFs remain poorly documented. This case illustrates a complex humeral NPPIF and [...] Read more.
Background and Clinical Significance: Non-prosthetic peri-implant fractures (NPPIFs) are rare injuries occurring around internal fixation devices, and are distinct from periprosthetic fractures. While most studies focus on the femur, humeral NPPIFs remain poorly documented. This case illustrates a complex humeral NPPIF and highlights key surgical considerations. Case Presentation: A 62-year-old woman presented with a spiral humeral shaft fracture (AO 12B2) after a fall. Following closed reduction and antegrade intramedullary nailing, an intraoperative peri-implant fracture occurred at the distal interlocking screw. CT imaging revealed a complex fracture extending from the lateral condyle to the proximal humerus. Treatment included implant removal and open reduction with dual plate fixation—lateral distal and helically contoured proximal plates—plus cerclage bands and antibiotic-loaded beads. Recovery was uneventful, with a full range of motion achieved at six months. At one year, the DASH score and MEPS were 86 and 75, respectively. Conclusions: Humeral NPPIFs are challenging and require individualized, biomechanically sound strategies. This case reinforces the importance of intraoperative assessment and careful implant selection in humeral fracture management. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Orthopaedics/Rehabilitation/Physical Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1028 KiB  
Article
Comparative Analysis of Anterolateral and Posterior Approaches for Distal Humerus Shaft Fractures: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
by Yong-Cheol Yoon, Hyoung-Keun Oh, Hyung-Suh Kim and Joon-Woo Kim
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(9), 2890; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14092890 - 22 Apr 2025
Viewed by 687
Abstract
Background: Distal humeral shaft fractures (DHSFs) pose surgical challenges due to the proximity to the elbow joint, limited bone stock, and the risk of radial nerve injury. This study compared clinical and radiographic outcomes of anterolateral and posterior triceps-sparing approaches to determine [...] Read more.
Background: Distal humeral shaft fractures (DHSFs) pose surgical challenges due to the proximity to the elbow joint, limited bone stock, and the risk of radial nerve injury. This study compared clinical and radiographic outcomes of anterolateral and posterior triceps-sparing approaches to determine the most effective surgical strategy. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included 75 patients who underwent surgery for a DHSF between 2015 and 2021, with a minimum one-year follow-up, a distal fragment ≥3 cm, and no preoperative radial nerve injury. Fifty patients underwent anterior plating via anterolateral approach, and twenty-five underwent posterior plating. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were evaluated. Results: Bone union was achieved in 74 patients (98.7%), with no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.21). The anterolateral approach resulted in a shorter operative time (116 ± 29.4 vs. 143 ± 31.4 min, p = 0.03). However, intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.36), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (p = 0.71), range of motion (p = 0.36), and complication rates (p = 0.21) were not significantly different. Two cases of transient radial nerve palsy occurred in the posterior group (p = 0.17), and four cases required implant removal due to discomfort (p = 0.18) in the anterolateral group. Conclusions: Both approaches effectively treat DHSFs with high union rates and comparable functional outcomes. However, the anterolateral approach significantly reduces operative time due to supine positioning, direct access, and avoiding radial nerve dissection. Posterior plating remains viable when stable anterior fixation is unachievable. Further studies should assess the long-term outcomes and factors influencing approach selection. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Accelerating Fracture Healing: Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 2019 KiB  
Article
Trends and Changes in Treating Proximal Humeral Fractures in Italy: Is Arthroplasty an Increasingly Preferred Option? A Nation-Wide, Population-Based Study over a Period of 22 Years
by Enrico Ciminello, Andrea Modesti, Emilio Romanini, Stefano Lepore, Gabriele Tucci, Stefano Di Gennaro, Giandomenico Logroscino, Paola Ciccarelli, Tiziana Falcone and Marina Torre
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(19), 5780; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13195780 - 27 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1115
Abstract
Background: Proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) are common, especially in the elderly, and account for 4% to 10% of all fractures, with women more often affected than men. Treatments include conservative methods, internal fixation and arthroplasty, with surgical approaches increasingly being used due [...] Read more.
Background: Proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) are common, especially in the elderly, and account for 4% to 10% of all fractures, with women more often affected than men. Treatments include conservative methods, internal fixation and arthroplasty, with surgical approaches increasingly being used due to technological advancements. This study analyzes the evolution of PHF treatments in Italy from 2001 to 2022, using data from the Italian Hospital Discharge Records (HDRs) Database, and includes a stratified analysis by age and sex. Methods: Using HDR data from 2001 to 2022, records with ICD9-CM codes for proximal humeral fractures (812.0 and 812.1) among diagnoses were selected and categorized into three treatment groups: arthroplasty, fixation and conservative. Time series were analyzed with stratification by sex and age. Results: The extracted data included 486,368 records of PHFs, with 223,742 cases treated surgically (arthroplasty or internal fixation) and 262,626 treated conservatively; the average patient age was 66.6 years, with a higher proportion of women, especially among arthroplasty patients. Over time, the use of fixation and arthroplasty increased from 20% of treatments in 2001 to over 60% in 2022, with fixation becoming the most common treatment method by 2014 and arthroplasty significantly increasing among women, particularly in the 65–74 and 75–84 age groups. Conclusions: The study shows that in Italy, over the past two decades, treatment for PHFs has shifted from conservative methods to a preference for internal fixation and increasingly for arthroplasty, particularly among women and patients aged 65–84, reflecting evolving trends and technological improvements. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Acute Trauma and Trauma Care in Orthopedics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 532 KiB  
Review
Locking Plate Fixation with Calcium Phosphate Bone Cement Augmentation for Elderly Proximal Humerus Fractures—A Single-Center Experience and Literature Review
by Chun-Chi Peng, Ting-Han Tai and Chih-Yu Chen
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(17), 5109; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13175109 - 28 Aug 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1510
Abstract
Proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) are among the most common upper-extremity fractures, with a rising incidence linked to the growing elderly population. Treatment options include non-surgical and surgical methods, but the best approach for geriatric PHFs remains debated. Patient selection for treatment must consider [...] Read more.
Proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) are among the most common upper-extremity fractures, with a rising incidence linked to the growing elderly population. Treatment options include non-surgical and surgical methods, but the best approach for geriatric PHFs remains debated. Patient selection for treatment must consider clinical and functional outcomes and the potential complications of surgery. Osteoporosis, a key factor in elderly PHFs, meaning those in patients over 65 years old, often results from low-energy trauma and necessitates treatments that enhance bone healing. Bone cement, such as calcium phosphate, is widely used to improve fracture stability and healing. However, the benefits of surgical fixation with bone cement augmentation (BCA) for elderly PHF patients remain controversial. Hence, in this article, we searched databases including MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science to analyze the evidence on locking plate fixation (LPF) with BCA for proximal humeral fractures. We aim to provide readers with updates concerning the above issues. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Orthopedics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1169 KiB  
Article
Head–Shaft Angle Influences Isometric Shoulder Strength Levels after Intramedullary Nailing of Proximal Humerus Fractures: A Pilot Study
by Sebastian Grimme, Hermann Josef Bail, Johannes Rüther, Michael Millrose, Roland Biber, Markus Gesslein and Maximilian Willauschus
J. Pers. Med. 2024, 14(9), 907; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14090907 - 27 Aug 2024
Viewed by 1225
Abstract
Background: Proximal humerus fractures are common fractures of the elderly population which can lead to long-term compromise of a patient’s shoulder function. Closed reduction and internal fixation with intramedullary nailing is a well-established surgical technique yielding good outcomes, as perceived by patients, obtained [...] Read more.
Background: Proximal humerus fractures are common fractures of the elderly population which can lead to long-term compromise of a patient’s shoulder function. Closed reduction and internal fixation with intramedullary nailing is a well-established surgical technique yielding good outcomes, as perceived by patients, obtained via Patient-Reported Outcome Measures, and objectified by clinical shoulder testing. Apart from conventional range-of-motion testing and clinical shoulder tests, strength testing of the shoulder is a yet-neglected but meaningful and standardizable outcome parameter. In this study, isometric shoulder strength is evaluated in relation to fracture morphology/postoperative reduction quality as well as with patient-reported outcomes. Methods: 25 patients (mean age 73.2 ± 10.5 years) underwent isometrics strength-testing of the shoulder joint in the scapular plane (abduction) as well as in the sagittal plane (flexion) as well as hand-grip strength-testing at 4.5 ± 1.88 years follow-up. Pre- and postoperative radiographs were analysed. Patients completed ASES and CMS questionnaires. Results: Patients exhibited a decrease in abduction and flexion force (−24.47% and −25.30%, respectively, p < 0.001) using the contralateral, uninjured arm as reference. Abduction force tended to be decreased in three- and four-part fractures. Patient satisfaction correlated negatively with the relatively reduced force of the affected arm. Varus-angulated humeral heads produced significantly lower abduction force output than valgus- or physiologic angulation (p = 0.014), whereas flexion force was unaffected (p = 0.468). The anatomical reduction had no influence on shoulder strength. Conclusions: Proximal humerus fractures may cause a significant reduction in shoulder function, both reported by patients and objectified by shoulder strength testing. Varus head angulation demonstrated the greatest loss of shoulder strength and should be avoided to ensure proper functioning. Further, strength testing seems a valuable outcome parameter for a thorough shoulder examination with easy obtainability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Personalized Management in Orthopedics and Traumatology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1390 KiB  
Article
Comparison of Short Uncemented Metaphyseal Stem and Long-Stem Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in Proximal Humerus Fractures: Preliminary Study at 2-Year Follow-Up
by Giorgio Ippolito, Riccardo Maria Lanzetti, Sergio Ferraro, Valerio Pace, Marco Damo, Michele Francesco Surace, Alessio Davide Enrico Giai Via, Michele Crivellaro, Giancarlo De Marinis and Marco Spoliti
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(16), 4665; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13164665 - 8 Aug 2024
Viewed by 1446
Abstract
Introduction: In the last few years, short metaphyseal-socket prosthetic humeral stems have been introduced for reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). A short stem may have advantages in humeral force distribution, reducing shear stress and preserving bone stock, keeping in mind the need for [...] Read more.
Introduction: In the last few years, short metaphyseal-socket prosthetic humeral stems have been introduced for reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). A short stem may have advantages in humeral force distribution, reducing shear stress and preserving bone stock, keeping in mind the need for possible future revision surgery. The main objective of our study was to validate the use of a short stem prosthesis in the surgical treatment of humeral fractures by comparing clinical and radiological outcomes of our studied implant with those obtained with the use of traditional long-stem implants. Methods: In this multicentric, controlled prospective study, 125 patients with proximal three- or four-fragment humerus fractures were selected and treated with RSA. A short stem was used in group A (n = 53, mean age: 75.6 ± 5.6 years old), and a long stem was used in group B (n = 72, mean age: 71.76 ± 3). Active range of motion (ROM), Constant score (CS), Quick DASH, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder (ASES) score, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores were collected and analyzed at 2 years mean follow-up, as well as humeral and glenoid bone resorption (sum Inoue scores and Sirveaux scores were used). Results: No statistically significant differences were observed between group A and B in ROM, Constant score (51.69 ± 15.8 vs. 53.46 ± 15.96, p > 0.05), Quick DASH (31.5 ± 21.81 vs. 28.79 ± 13.72, p = 0.85), ASES (82.53 ± 17.79 vs. 84.34 ± 15.24, p = 0.57), or the VAS (0.53 ± 1 vs. 0.56 ± 1.07, p = 0.14) at the final follow-up. No statistically significant differences were found in the radiographic parameters between the two groups. No statistically significant differences were found for the average degree of humeral and glenoid bone resorption either. Conclusions: The use of a short metaphyseal-socket stem can be considered a safe, effective, and feasible option in reverse shoulder arthroplasty for treating proximal humerus fractures. Our results are encouraging, with no statistically significant differences identified between the proposed treatment and traditional long stems. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Updates on Shoulder Arthroplasty)
Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 440 KiB  
Review
Management of Pediatric Elbow Fractures and Dislocations
by Marko Bašković, Domagoj Pešorda, Luca Zaninović, Damir Hasandić, Katarina Lohman Vuga and Zenon Pogorelić
Children 2024, 11(8), 906; https://doi.org/10.3390/children11080906 - 27 Jul 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3626
Abstract
Pediatric elbow fractures and dislocations have always been a challenge from a diagnostic and therapeutic point of view, primarily due to the complex nature of the pediatric elbow, especially its developmental anatomy. They must be diagnosed and treated on time to prevent numerous [...] Read more.
Pediatric elbow fractures and dislocations have always been a challenge from a diagnostic and therapeutic point of view, primarily due to the complex nature of the pediatric elbow, especially its developmental anatomy. They must be diagnosed and treated on time to prevent numerous complications with long-term consequences. With the development of radiology and pediatric surgery and orthopedics, as well as the development of modern osteosynthesis materials, concerning current scientific and professional knowledge, the outcomes are getting better, with fewer acute and chronic complications. This comprehensive review aims to provide clinicians current knowledge about pediatric elbow fractures and dislocations so that in daily practice they have as few doubts as possible with the best possible treatment outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pediatric Orthopedics & Sports Medicine)
11 pages, 8433 KiB  
Article
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Proximal Humeral Fractures: Is the Bigliani-Flatow Stem Suitable for Tuberosity Fixation and Healing?
by Enrico Bellato, Valeria Fava, Andrea Arpaia, Michel Calò, Antonio Marmotti and Filippo Castoldi
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(12), 3388; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13123388 - 9 Jun 2024
Viewed by 1602
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The aim of the study was to investigate the clinical, functional, and radiographic results of patients affected by three- or four-part proximal humeral fractures treated with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, to investigate whether a prosthetic stem nonspecifically designed for fractures (i.e., [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The aim of the study was to investigate the clinical, functional, and radiographic results of patients affected by three- or four-part proximal humeral fractures treated with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, to investigate whether a prosthetic stem nonspecifically designed for fractures (i.e., the Bigliani-Flatow stem) promotes tuberosities’ healing, and to evaluate the impact of tuberosity fixation and healing on the outcomes. Methods: Patients’ data such as gender, age, side and dominancy, comorbidities, complications during or after surgery, and time lapse between trauma and surgery were prospectively collected. The type of fixation of the stem, the thickness and type of liner, and whether the tuberosities were fixed or not were also recorded. The Constant score weighted on the contralateral limb, QuickDASH, Oxford Shoulder Score, and Subjective Shoulder Value were collected. Tuberosities’ healing was assessed with X-rays (anteroposterior, Grashey, and axillary views). Results: Overall, 34 patients were included, with an average follow-up of 42 months. Tuberosities were reinserted in 24 cases and their healing rate was 83%. The mean values were the following: a Constant score of 64, Oxford Shoulder Score of 39, Subjective Shoulder Value of 71, and QuickDASH score of 27. There were no significant differences in the scores or range of motion between patients with tuberosities healed, reabsorbed, or not reattached. There was a better external rotation in the group with healed tuberosities and a longer duration of surgery to reattach tuberosities. Conclusions: The treatment of proximal humerus fractures with the Bigliani-Flatow stem is associated with good clinical and functional results. The healing rate of the tuberosities was high and comparable, if not even better, than the mean rates reported for the stems dedicated to fractures of the proximal humerus and was, therefore, also appropriate for this indication. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Shoulder and Elbow Disease: Current Treatment and Future Options)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 2504 KiB  
Article
Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis for Proximal Humeral Fractures: Primary Treatment vs. Salvage Procedure
by Antonio Caldaria, Luca Saccone, Nicolò Biagi, Edoardo Giovannetti de Sanctis, Angelo Baldari, Alessio Palumbo and Francesco Franceschi
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(11), 3063; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13113063 - 23 May 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2114
Abstract
Background: The optimal treatment for complex proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) lacks consensus, with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) often being a final resort rather than a primary approach. This study aimed to compare outcomes and satisfaction rates of primary RTSA for PHFs versus [...] Read more.
Background: The optimal treatment for complex proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) lacks consensus, with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) often being a final resort rather than a primary approach. This study aimed to compare outcomes and satisfaction rates of primary RTSA for PHFs versus salvage RTSA for previously unsuccessful treatments. We hypothesized that primary RTSA would yield superior clinical outcomes, functional scores, and patient satisfaction. Methods: A retrospective analysis of RSA procedures between 2011 and 2021 was conducted, focusing on primary RTSA for PHFs or salvage RTSA for failed osteosynthesis. Patients meeting inclusion criteria underwent clinical and radiological follow-up for at least two years. Demographic characteristics, outcomes scores, and range of motion (ROM) were assessed. Results: Of 63 patients, 42 underwent primary RTSA and 21 underwent salvage RTSA. The median follow-up was 50 months. Statistically significant differences favored primary RTSA in forward flexion, abduction, internal rotation, and Constant shoulder score. Patient satisfaction levels did not significantly differ between groups. Complications occurred in 7.15% of primary RTSA cases and 14.28% of salvage RTSA cases. Conclusions: Primary RTSA may yield slightly better outcomes and lower complication rates compared to salvage RTSA. Further prospective studies are necessary to validate these findings. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Shoulder and Elbow Surgery: Current Hurdles and Future Perspectives)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 3889 KiB  
Case Report
Novel Use of a Fibular Strut Allograft with Fibular Head in an Elderly Patient with Proximal Humeral Fracture and Severe Metaphyseal Comminution: An Alternative to Shoulder Arthroplasty
by Jun-Hyuk Lim, Yeong-Seub Ahn, Sungmin Kim and Myung-Sun Kim
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(8), 2200; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13082200 - 11 Apr 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1948
Abstract
Treatment of a comminuted proximal humerus fracture (PHF) in elderly patients with severe osteoporosis is challenging, often leading to arthroplasty (such as hemiarthroplasty or reverse shoulder arthroplasty) as the treatment of choice. However, arthroplasty does not always guarantee favorable outcomes. In contrast, the [...] Read more.
Treatment of a comminuted proximal humerus fracture (PHF) in elderly patients with severe osteoporosis is challenging, often leading to arthroplasty (such as hemiarthroplasty or reverse shoulder arthroplasty) as the treatment of choice. However, arthroplasty does not always guarantee favorable outcomes. In contrast, the use of intramedullary fibular strut allografts provides additional reduction stability during locking plate fixation; however, to our knowledge, there is limited literature on the use of fibular strut allografts, including the fibular head. Here we aim to report the advantages of using a fibular strut containing the fibular head in severe osteoporotic PHFs. We present the case of an 88-year-old female patient with severe osteoporosis diagnosed with a left PHF accompanied by severe metaphyseal comminution following a fall from a chair. Rather than shoulder arthroplasty, we performed osteosynthesis using a fibular strut allograft containing the fibular head. At the one-year follow-up after surgery, we observed excellent bony union and a favorable functional outcome without major complications, such as reduction loss. The novel use of a fibular strut allograft containing the fibular head could be promising for PHFs with severe metaphyseal comminution, potentially avoiding the need for arthroplasty. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

14 pages, 1984 KiB  
Review
Overview of Cochrane Systematic Reviews for Rehabilitation Interventions in Individuals with Upper Limb Fractures: A Mapping Synthesis
by Sara Liguori, Antimo Moretti, Giuseppe Toro, Chiara Arienti, Michele Patrini, Carlotte Kiekens, Stefano Negrini, Giovanni Iolascon and Francesca Gimigliano
Medicina 2024, 60(3), 469; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60030469 - 12 Mar 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3480
Abstract
Background and Objectives. This overview of Cochrane systematic reviews (CSRs) reports on current evidence on the effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions for persons with upper limb fractures (ULFs), and the quality of the evidence. Materials and Methods. Following the inclusion criteria defined [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives. This overview of Cochrane systematic reviews (CSRs) reports on current evidence on the effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions for persons with upper limb fractures (ULFs), and the quality of the evidence. Materials and Methods. Following the inclusion criteria defined by the World Health Organization, all CSRs tagged in the Cochrane Rehabilitation database that were relevant for persons with ULFs were included. A mapping synthesis was used to group outcomes and comparisons of included CSRs, indicating the effect of rehabilitation interventions and the certainty of evidence. Results. A total of three CSRs were included in the evidence map. The certainty of evidence was judged as low to very low. Early occupational and hand therapy, cyclic pneumatic soft tissue compression, and cross-education, when started during immobilization, may improve grip strength and wrist range of motion, with results maintained up to 12 weeks from the cast removal, compared to no intervention. Approaches such as occupational therapy and passive mobilisation, started post-immobilization, are probably safe in terms of secondary complications. However, the overall evidence of rehabilitative interventions related to proximal humeral fractures has been judged insufficient for all the outcomes considered. A paucity of primary studies and CSRs for elbow fractures was noted. Conclusions. This overview provided the effect and the certainty of evidence of rehabilitation interventions available after ULFs using a mapping synthesis. To date, there is a need to further the effectiveness and safety of these interventions for persons with ULFs, improving methodological quality of the research in the field. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 16043 KiB  
Case Report
The Treatment of Periprosthetic Fracture Revision of the Humerus with “Bamboo Support” Structural Allograft Technique—Atrophic Non-Union of a Post-Operative Periprosthetic Fracture after Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Case Report
by Hsien-Hao Chang, Joon-Ryul Lim, Tae-Hwan Yoon, Yong-Min Chun and Hyoung-Sik Kim
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(3), 825; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13030825 - 31 Jan 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1948
Abstract
Periprosthetic fractures are a serious complication of joint replacement surgery. With the growing prevalence of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA), the incidence of relatively uncommon periprosthetic humeral fractures has increased. Here, we present the unique case of a 74-year-old woman who developed atrophic [...] Read more.
Periprosthetic fractures are a serious complication of joint replacement surgery. With the growing prevalence of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA), the incidence of relatively uncommon periprosthetic humeral fractures has increased. Here, we present the unique case of a 74-year-old woman who developed atrophic non-union after plate osteosynthesis for a periprosthetic fracture associated with RTSA. Fixation failure was evident 3 months after the surgical intervention; the patient underwent a 3-month course of arm sling immobilization. However, bone resorption continued, and varus angulation of the fracture developed. In this case, surgical strategy involved the use of long proximal humerus internal locked system plate (DePuy Synthes, Paoli, PA, USA), augmented with autologous iliac bone graft and allogenic humerus structural bone graft with the “bamboo support technique”, fixed with Cable System (DePuy Synthes, Paoli, PA, USA). No reports have addressed the management of failed periprosthetic fractures using allogeneic humeral strut bone grafts. This report aims to fill the gap by presenting a novel surgical technique for the management of periprosthetic fractures associated with RTSA in case of treatment failure. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Management and Outcome of Periprosthetic Fracture)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 5112 KiB  
Case Report
The Arterial Axis Lesions in Proximal Humeral Fractures—Case Report and Literature Review
by Cosmin Ioan Faur, Razvan Nitu, Simona-Alina Abu-Awwad, Cristina Tudoran and Ahmed Abu-Awwad
J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13(12), 1712; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13121712 - 14 Dec 2023
Viewed by 1515
Abstract
Background: This comprehensive review delves into the nuanced domain of arterial axis lesions associated with proximal humeral fractures, elucidating the intricate interplay between fracture patterns and vascular compromise. Proximal humeral fractures, a common orthopedic occurrence, often present challenges beyond the skeletal realm, necessitating [...] Read more.
Background: This comprehensive review delves into the nuanced domain of arterial axis lesions associated with proximal humeral fractures, elucidating the intricate interplay between fracture patterns and vascular compromise. Proximal humeral fractures, a common orthopedic occurrence, often present challenges beyond the skeletal realm, necessitating a profound understanding of the vascular implications. Methods: The study synthesizes the existing literature, presenting a collective analysis of documented cases and their respective clinical outcomes. The spectrum of arterial axis lesions, from subtle vascular compromise to overt ischemic events, is systematically examined, highlighting the varied clinical manifestations encountered in proximal humeral fractures. Diagnostic modalities, including advanced imaging techniques such as angiography and Doppler ultrasound, are scrutinized for their efficacy in identifying arterial axis lesions promptly. The review emphasizes the critical role of early and accurate diagnosis in mitigating the potential sequelae associated with vascular compromise, thereby underscoring the importance of a vigilant clinical approach. Results: Therapeutic strategies, ranging from conservative management to surgical interventions, are critically evaluated in the context of existing evidence. The evolving landscape of endovascular interventions and their applicability in addressing arterial axis lesions specific to proximal humeral fractures is explored, providing valuable insights for clinicians navigating the therapeutic decision-making process. Furthermore, the review addresses gaps in current knowledge and proposes avenues for future research, emphasizing the need for tailored, evidence-based guidelines in the management of arterial axis lesions in proximal humeral fractures. By consolidating current understanding and pointing towards areas warranting further exploration, this review contributes to the ongoing discourse surrounding the intricacies of vascular complications in orthopedic trauma. Conclusions: this comprehensive review provides a synthesized overview of arterial axis lesions in proximal humeral fractures, offering a valuable resource for clinicians, researchers, and educators alike. The findings underscore the multifaceted nature of these lesions and advocate for a holistic, patient-centered approach to their management. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1619 KiB  
Article
Helical Plating Compared with Straight Plating and Nailing for Treatment of Proximal Third Humeral Shaft Fractures—A Biomechanical Study
by Torsten Pastor, Ivan Zderic, Tatjana Pastor, Ludmil Drenchev, Hristo Kostov Skulev, Kenneth P. van Knegsel, Mark Lenz, Björn-Christian Link, Boyko Gueorguiev and Frank J. P. Beeres
Medicina 2023, 59(11), 2043; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59112043 - 20 Nov 2023
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2252
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The surgical treatment of proximal humeral shaft fractures usually considers application of either long straight plates or intramedullary nails. By being able to spare the rotator cuff and avoid the radial nerve distally, the implementation of helical plates might [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: The surgical treatment of proximal humeral shaft fractures usually considers application of either long straight plates or intramedullary nails. By being able to spare the rotator cuff and avoid the radial nerve distally, the implementation of helical plates might overcome the downsides of common fixation methods. The aims of the current study were (1) to explore the biomechanical competence of different plate designs and (2) to compare their performance versus the alternative treatment option of using intramedullary nails. Materials and Methods: Twenty-four artificial humeri were assigned to the following four groups for simulation of an unstable proximal humeral shaft fracture and instrumentation: Group 1 (Straight-PHILOS), Group 2 (MULTILOC-Nail), Group 3 (45°-Helical-PHILOS), and Group 4 (90°-Helical-PHILOS). All specimens underwent non-destructive, quasi-static biomechanical testing under loading in axial compression, torsion in internal/external rotation, and pure bending in four directions, accompanied by motion tracking. Results: Axial stiffness/displacement in Group 2 was significantly higher/smaller than in all other groups (p ≤ 0.010). Torsional displacement in Group 2 was significantly bigger than in all other groups (p ≤ 0.017). Significantly smaller coronal plane displacement was identified in Group 2 versus all other groups (p < 0.001) and in Group 4 versus Group 1 (p = 0.022). Significantly bigger sagittal plane displacement was detected in Group 4 versus all other groups (p ≤ 0.024) and in Group 1 versus Group 2 (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Intramedullary nails demonstrated higher axial stiffness and smaller axial interfragmentary movements compared with all investigated plate designs. However, they were associated with bigger torsional movements at the fracture site. Although 90°-helical plates revealed bigger interfragmentary movements in the sagittal plane, they demonstrated improved resistance against displacements in the coronal plane when compared with straight lateral plates. In addition, 45°-helical plates manifested similar biomechanical competence to straight plates and may be considered a valid alternative to the latter from a biomechanical standpoint. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Orthopedics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop