Search Results (38)

Biofilms are structured communities of microorganisms encased in a self-produced extracellular matrix, and they represent one of the most widespread forms of microbial life on Earth. Their presence poses serious challenges in both environmental and clinical settings. In natural and industrial systems, biofilms contribute to water contamination, pipeline corrosion, and biofouling. Clinically, biofilm-associated infections are responsible for approximately 80% of all microbial infections, including endocarditis, osteomyelitis, cystic fibrosis, and chronic sinusitis. A particularly critical concern is their colonization of medical devices, where biofilms can lead to chronic infections, implant failure, and increased mortality. Implantable devices, such as orthopedic implants, cardiac pacemakers, cochlear implants, urinary catheters, and hernia meshes, are highly susceptible to microbial attachment and biofilm development. These infections are often recalcitrant to conventional antibiotics and frequently necessitate surgical revision. In the United States, over 500,000 biofilm-related implant infections occur annually, with prosthetic joint infections alone projected to incur revision surgery costs exceeding USD 500 million per year—a figure expected to rise to USD 1.62 billion by 2030. To address these challenges, surface modification of medical devices has emerged as a promising strategy to prevent bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation. This review focuses on recent advances in chemical surface functionalization using non-antibiotic agents, such as enzymes, chelating agents, quorum sensing quenching factors, biosurfactants, oxidizing compounds and nanoparticles, designed to enhance antifouling and mature biofilm eradication properties. These approaches aim not only to prevent device-associated infections but also to reduce dependence on antibiotics and mitigate the development of antimicrobial resistance. Full article

Background/Objectives: The rising demand for total joint arthroplasty (TJA) and increasing incidence of prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) significantly burden patients and healthcare systems. This retrospective study describes the epidemiology, clinical characteristics and outcomes of PJIs in Iceland from 2003 to 2020. Methods: PJI cases were identified through synovial fluid cultures and ICD codes, with classification per EBJIS criteria. Unlikely cases were excluded. Results: Among 293 cases with a mean age of 70 years, 60% (176/293) were males and 58% (171/293) involved the knee. Over half of infections occurred within two years post TJA, with an incidence rate of 0.94%, increasing significantly over time (p = 0.012). Males had significantly higher incidence rates than females (incidence rate ratio 0.42; p < 0.001). The most common pathogens were coagulase-negative staphylococci (30%, 88/293), and 9% (27/293) of cases were culture-negative. DAIR was the first-line treatment in about 50% (147/293) of cases but it failed in nearly half, contributing to an overall treatment failure rate of 38% (98/259). PJI-related mortality was 2% (6/293). Conclusions: The results indicate an increased incidence, with the highest risk within two years of TJA. Males are at greater risk, while females more commonly undergo TJA. DAIR success rates were lower than reported elsewhere but improved significantly over time. Better methods to prevent PJIs are needed. Full article

Surgical site infections (SSIs) and prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) remain significant challenges in orthopedic surgery, particularly in joint arthroplasty. Intraoperative irrigation is a widely used strategy for infection prevention, yet traditional solutions such as saline, povidone-iodine, hydrogen peroxide, and sodium hypochlorite are limited by cytotoxicity, short antimicrobial duration, and poor biofilm penetration. This review evaluates commonly used irrigation agents and highlights the growing evidence supporting a novel citrate-based solution as a potentially superior alternative. These agents combine broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity, effective biofilm disruption through ionic chelation, and prolonged postoperative protection with minimal harm to host tissues. Early clinical studies and ongoing randomized trials have demonstrated promising results, including reductions in postoperative swelling, opioid use, and infection rates. As more data become available, citrate-based solutions may emerge as the preferred standard for intraoperative irrigation in orthopedic procedures. Full article

Background/Objectives: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) primarily results from bacterial biofilms adhering to prosthetic surfaces, making treatment challenging without prosthesis removal. This in vitro study aims to investigate whether the materials used in contemporary femoral head prosthesis influences bacterial biofilm development. Methods: Femoral head prostheses made of three different materials—cobalt–chrome, oxinium, and ceramic—were inoculated with either Staphylococcus aureus or Pseudomonas aeruginosa in separate experiments, with each pathogen tested independently. The samples were cultured under shaking conditions at 37 °C for 96 h to promote biofilm formation. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to confirm the presence of biofilms, and adherent biofilms were quantified by counting colony-forming units (CFUs) after sonication. Additionally, crystal violet staining was performed to assess biofilm distribution on the femoral head surfaces. Statistical analyses compared CFU counts across the different materials. Results: The mean CFU counts for S. aureus were 7.6 × 10⁵ ± 9.7 × 10⁴ for cobalt–chrome, 6.9 × 10⁵ ± 3.6 × 10⁵ for oxinium, and 1.1 × 10⁶ ± 3.0 × 10⁵ for ceramic femoral head prostheses. For P. aeruginosa, the CFU counts were 2.3 × 10⁶ ± 7.2 × 10⁵, 3.7 × 10⁶ ± 2.5 × 10⁶, and 2.2 × 10⁶ ± 8.9 × 10⁵, respectively. Regardless of the bacterial strain, differences among the three materials were within one log range, and no statistical significance was observed. While biofilms were confirmed using SEM, limited adherence was observed on the bearing surface, with the biofilm predominantly localized in the taper hole. Conclusions: The findings suggest that the material used in contemporary femoral head prostheses has minimal impact on bacterial biofilm formation. Surgeons’ choice of femoral head prosthesis material should base their material selection on factors other than PJI prevention. Full article

Introduction: The prosthetic knee infection (PKI) rate in most centers ranges from 0.5 to 2% for knee replacements, depending on risk factors. Current PKI definitions may miss the identification of both early and late complications. There is no consensus on preventive or early empiric antibiotic therapy (EEAT) in the one-step exchange strategy for low-risk patients pending microbiology results. The aim of the study was to evaluate the potential role of EEAT in patients with comorbidities in preventing PKI and to evaluate differences in septic failure at 3, 6 and 9 months after prosthetic revision between patients undergoing EEAT and patients not undergoing EEAT. Methods: All adult patients undergoing one-step knee revision surgery at IRCCS Sacro-Cuore Don Calabria Negrar, from January 2018 to February 2021, were retrospectively included in a cohort observational study. Patients on antibiotic therapy before surgery or with preoperative ascertained PKI were excluded. Demographic characteristics, Charlson score, comorbidities, inflammatory markers, microbiological tests, imaging, infectious disease risk score and EEAT data were collected. Any postoperative complication or modification of antibiotic therapy at 14, 30, 90, 180 and 270 days after surgery was collected. Results: A total of 227 patients were included: 114 comorbid low-risk patients received EEAT after surgery, pending microbiological results; while 113 non-comorbid low-risk patients did not receive any antibiotic therapy in the postoperative period. Among the EEAT group, 16 were diagnosed with PKI, compared with 10 in the untreated group. Regarding septic failure during the 9-month follow-up after revision surgery, we registered nine cases in the EEAT arm and four in the untreated arm. In three out of nine cases treated with EEAT who had a post-revision septic failure, the causative microorganism was not successfully empirically targeted by EEAT; in the untreated group, two out of four cases had a post-revision septic failure, despite the targeted treatment of intraoperatively identified causative microorganisms. Conclusions: According to our results, EEAT after revision surgery in patients with comorbidities, who are at higher risk of infection, did not prevent prosthetic knee infections. There was also no evidence of a reduction in subsequent septic failure within nine months of revision surgery between groups. More accurate risk-defining scores are needed to identify patients at risk of PKI complications. Full article

Prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) remain a significant challenge, occurring in 1% to 2% of joint arthroplasties and potentially leading to a 20% to 30% mortality rate within 5 years. The primary pathogens responsible for PJIs include Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci, and Gram-negative bacteria, typically treated with intravenous antibiotic drugs. However, this conventional approach fails to effectively eradicate biofilms or the microbial burden in affected tissues. As a result, innovative strategies are being explored to enhance the efficacy of infection prevention through the development of antibacterial-coated implants. These coatings are required to demonstrate broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity, minimal local and systemic toxicity, favorable cost-effectiveness, and support for bone healing. In the present review, the analysis of various methodologies for developing antibacterial coatings was performed, emphasizing studies that conducted in vivo tests to advance potential clinical applications. A diversity of techniques employed for the development of coatings incorporating antimicrobial agents highlights promising avenues for reducing infection-related surgical failures. Full article

Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are a dangerous complication of joint replacement surgeries which have become much more common in recent years (mostly hip and knee replacement surgeries). Such a condition can lead to many health issues and often requires reoperation. Staphylococci is a bacterial group most common in terms of the pathogens causing PJIs. S. aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci are found in around two-thirds of PJI cases. Recently, the numbers of staphylococci that cause such infections and that are methicillin-resistant are increasing. This trend leads to difficulties in the treatment and prevention of such infections. That is why MRSA and MRSE groups require extraordinary attention when dealing with PJIs in order to successfully treat them. Controlling carriage, using optimal prosthetic materials, and implementing perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis are crucial strategies in infection prevention and are as essential as quick diagnosis and effective targeted treatment. The comprehensive professional procedures presented in this review show how to deal with such cases. Full article

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a major complication following total arthroplasty. Rising antimicrobial resistance (AMR) to antibiotics will further increase therapeutic insufficiency. New antibacterial technologies are being developed to prevent PJI. In vivo models are still needed to bridge the translational gap to clinical implementation. Though rabbit models have been used most frequently, there is no consensus about methodology and measured outcomes. The PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE databases were searched for literature on PJI in rabbit models. Data extraction included bias control, experimental design, and outcome measures of the NZW rabbit models in the articles. A total of 60 articles were included in this systematic literature review. The articles were divided into six groups based on the PJI intervention: no intervention used (21%), revision surgery (14%), prevention with only antibiotics (21%), prevention with surface modifications (7%), prevention with coatings (23%), and others (14%). Despite the current availability of guidelines and recommendations regarding experimental design, bias control, and outcome measures, many articles neglect to report on these matters. Ultimately, this analysis aims to assist researchers in determining suitable clinically relevant methodologies and outcome measures for in vivo PJI models using NZW rabbits to test new antimicrobial technologies. Full article

Background: Megaprostheses were first employed in oncological orthopedic surgery, but more recently, additional applications have arisen. These implants are not without any risks and device failure is quite frequent. The most feared complication is undoubtedly the implants’ infection; however, the exact incidence is still unknown. This systematic review aims to estimate in the current literature the overall incidence of megaprosthesis infections and to investigate possible risk/protective factors. Methods: We conducted a systematic search for studies published from July 1971 to December 2023 using specific keywords. To be included, studies needed to report either the megaprosthesis anatomical site, and/or whether the megaprosthesis was coated, and/or the surgical indication as oncological or non-oncological reasons. Results: The initial literature search resulted in 1281 studies. We evaluated 10,456 patients and the overall infection rate was 12%. In cancer patients, the infection rate was 22%, while in non-oncological patients, this was 16% (trauma 12%, mechanical failure 17%, prosthetic joint infections 26%). The overall infection rates comparing coated and uncoated implants were 10% and 12.5%, respectively. Conclusions: The number of megaprosthesis implants is increasing considerably. In traumatological patients, the infection rate is lower compared to all the other subgroups, while the infection rate remains higher in the cancer patient group. As these devices become more common, focused studies exploring epidemiological data, clinical outcomes, and long-term complications are needed to address the uncertainties in prevention and management. Full article

Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are one of the most worrying complications orthopedic surgeons could face; thus, methods to prevent them are evolving. Apart from systemic antibiotics, targeted strategies such as local antimicrobial coatings applied to prosthetics have been introduced. This narrative review aims to provide an overview of the main antimicrobial coatings available in arthroplasty orthopedic surgery practice. The search was performed on the PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and EMBASE databases, focusing on antimicrobial-coated devices used in clinical practice in the arthroplasty world. While silver technology has been widely adopted in the prosthetic oncological field with favorable outcomes, recently, silver associated with hydroxyapatite for cementless fixation, antibiotic-loaded hydrogel coatings, and iodine coatings have all been employed with promising protective results against PJIs. However, challenges persist, with each material having strengths and weaknesses under investigation. Therefore, this narrative review emphasizes that further clinical studies are needed to understand whether antimicrobial coatings can truly revolutionize the field of PJIs. Full article

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the most common mode of failure of megaprostheses, yet the literature on the topic is scarce, and studies report conflicting data regarding the optimal treatment strategy. Patients with megaprostheses PJI are often immunosuppressed, and surgeons must balance the trade-off between treatment efficacy and morbidity associated with the surgery aiming for infection eradication. Our review on megaprostheses PJI focuses on two axes: (1) risk factors and preventative strategies; and (2) surgical strategies to manage this condition. Risk factors were classified as either unmodifiable or modifiable. Attempts to decrease the risk of PJI should target the latter group. Strategies to prevent PJI include the use of silver-coated implants, timely discontinuation of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis, and adequate soft tissue coverage to diminish the amount of dead space. Regarding surgical treatment, main strategies include debridement, antibiotics, implant retention (DAIR), DAIR with modular component exchange, stem retention (DAIR plus), one-stage, and two-stage revision. Two-stage revision is the “gold standard” for PJI in conventional implants; however, its success hinges on adequate soft tissue coverage and willingness of patients to tolerate a spacer for a minimum of 6 weeks. DAIR plus and one-stage revisions may be appropriate for a select group of patients who cannot endure the morbidity of two surgeries. Moreover, whenever DAIR is considered, exchange of the modular components should be performed (DAIR plus). Due to the low volume of megaprostheses implanted, studies assessing PJI should be conducted in a multi-institutional fashion. This would allow for more meaningful comparison of groups, with sufficient statistical power. Level of evidence: IV. Full article

There is a growing interest in tissue engineering, in which biomaterials play a pivotal role in promoting bone regeneration. Furthermore, smart functionalization can provide biomaterials with the additional role of preventing orthopedic infections. Due to the growing microbial resistance to antimicrobials used to treat those infections, metal ions, such as silver, thanks to their known wide range of bactericidal properties, are believed to be promising additives in developing antibacterial biomaterials. In this work, novel poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL)-based 3D scaffolds have been designed and developed, where the polymer matrix was modified with both silver (Ag), to supply antibacterial behavior, and calcium phosphates (biphasic calcium phosphate, BCP) particles to impart bioactive/bioresorbable properties. The microstructural analysis showed that constructs were characterized by square-shaped macropores, in line with the morphology and size of the templating salts used as pore formers. Degradation tests demonstrated the important role of calcium phosphates in improving PCL hydrophilicity, leading to a higher degradation degree for BCP/PCL composites compared to the neat polymer after 18 days of soaking. The appearance of an inhibition halo around the silver-functionalized PCL scaffolds for assayed microorganisms and a significant (p < 0.05) decrease in both adherent and planktonic bacteria demonstrate the Ag+ release from the 3D constructs. Furthermore, the PCL scaffolds enriched with the lowest silver percentages did not hamper the viability and proliferation of Saos-2 cells. A synergic combination of antimicrobial, osteoproliferative and biodegradable features provided to 3D scaffolds the required potential for bone tissue engineering, beside anti-microbial properties for reduction in prosthetic joints infections. Full article

Due to the increase in the life span and mobility at older ages, the number of implanted prosthetic joints is constantly increasing. However, the number of periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs), one of the most severe complications after total joint arthroplasty, also shows an increasing trend. PJI has an incidence of 1–2% in the case of primary arthroplasties and up to 4% in the case of revision operations. The development of efficient protocols for managing periprosthetic infections can lead to the establishment of preventive measures and effective diagnostic methods based on the results obtained after the laboratory tests. In this review, we will briefly present the current methods used in PJI diagnosis and the current and emerging synovial biomarkers used for the prognosis, prophylaxis, and early diagnosis of periprosthetic infections. We will discuss treatment failure that may result from patient factors, microbiological factors, or factors related to errors during diagnosis. Full article

Prosthetic joint infection is an uncommon entity, but it supposes high costs, both from the economic side to the health systems and from the emotional side of the patient. The evaluation of the bacterial adherence to different materials frequently involved in joint prostheses allows us to better understand the mechanisms underlying this and provide information for the future development of prevention strategies. This study evaluated the bacterial adherence of four different species (Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) on Ti6Al4V and CoCrMo. The topography, surface contact angles, and linear average roughness were measured in the samples from both alloys. The interaction with the surface of both alloys was significantly different, with the CoCrMo showing an aggregating effect on all the species, with additional anti-adherent activity in the case of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The viability also changes, with a significant decrease (p < 0.05) in the CoCrMo alloy. In the case of S. epidermidis, the viability in the supernatant from the samples was different, too, with a decrease in the colony-forming units in the Ti6Al4V, which could be related to cation release from the surface. Beyond adhesion is a multifactorial and complex process, and considering that topography and wettability were similar, the chemical composition could play a main role in the different properties observed. Full article

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) presents several clinical challenges. This is in large part due to the formation of biofilm which can make infection eradication exceedingly difficult. Following an extensive literature search, this review surveys a variety of non-pharmacological methods of preventing and/or treating biofilm within the body and how they could be utilized in the treatment of PJI. Special attention has been paid to physical strategies such as heat, light, sound, and electromagnetic energy, and their uses in biofilm treatment. Though these methods are still under study, they offer a potential means to reduce the morbidity and financial burden related to multiple stage revisions and prolonged systemic antibiotic courses that make up the current gold standard in PJI treatment. Given that these options are still in the early stages of development and offer their own strengths and weaknesses, this review offers an assessment of each method, the progress made on each, and allows for comparison of methods with discussion of future challenges to their implementation in a clinical setting. Full article