Next Article in Journal
Stem Cells: Present Understanding and Prospects for Regenerative Dentistry
Next Article in Special Issue
Electrodepositing Ag on Anodized Stainless Steel for Enhanced Antibacterial Properties and Corrosion Resistance
Previous Article in Journal
Early Effects of Porcine Placental Extracts and Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes on Aging Stress in Skin Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Antibacterial Size Effect of ZnO Nanoparticles and Their Role as Additives in Emulsion Waterborne Paint
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Prosthetic Joint Infection Research Models in NZW Rabbits: Opportunities for Standardization—A Systematic Review

by
Julia L. van Agtmaal
1,
Sanne W. G. van Hoogstraten
1 and
Jacobus J. C. Arts
1,2,*
1
Laboratory for Experimental Orthopaedics, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Centre, 6229 Maastricht, The Netherlands
2
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Orthopaedic Biomechanics, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5612 Eindhoven, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Funct. Biomater. 2024, 15(10), 307; https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb15100307
Submission received: 20 August 2024 / Revised: 8 October 2024 / Accepted: 10 October 2024 / Published: 15 October 2024

Abstract

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a major complication following total arthroplasty. Rising antimicrobial resistance (AMR) to antibiotics will further increase therapeutic insufficiency. New antibacterial technologies are being developed to prevent PJI. In vivo models are still needed to bridge the translational gap to clinical implementation. Though rabbit models have been used most frequently, there is no consensus about methodology and measured outcomes. The PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE databases were searched for literature on PJI in rabbit models. Data extraction included bias control, experimental design, and outcome measures of the NZW rabbit models in the articles. A total of 60 articles were included in this systematic literature review. The articles were divided into six groups based on the PJI intervention: no intervention used (21%), revision surgery (14%), prevention with only antibiotics (21%), prevention with surface modifications (7%), prevention with coatings (23%), and others (14%). Despite the current availability of guidelines and recommendations regarding experimental design, bias control, and outcome measures, many articles neglect to report on these matters. Ultimately, this analysis aims to assist researchers in determining suitable clinically relevant methodologies and outcome measures for in vivo PJI models using NZW rabbits to test new antimicrobial technologies.
Keywords: prosthetic joint infection; NZW rabbit; in vivo; antibacterial technologies; ARRIVE guidelines prosthetic joint infection; NZW rabbit; in vivo; antibacterial technologies; ARRIVE guidelines

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

van Agtmaal, J.L.; van Hoogstraten, S.W.G.; Arts, J.J.C. Prosthetic Joint Infection Research Models in NZW Rabbits: Opportunities for Standardization—A Systematic Review. J. Funct. Biomater. 2024, 15, 307. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb15100307

AMA Style

van Agtmaal JL, van Hoogstraten SWG, Arts JJC. Prosthetic Joint Infection Research Models in NZW Rabbits: Opportunities for Standardization—A Systematic Review. Journal of Functional Biomaterials. 2024; 15(10):307. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb15100307

Chicago/Turabian Style

van Agtmaal, Julia L., Sanne W. G. van Hoogstraten, and Jacobus J. C. Arts. 2024. "Prosthetic Joint Infection Research Models in NZW Rabbits: Opportunities for Standardization—A Systematic Review" Journal of Functional Biomaterials 15, no. 10: 307. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb15100307

APA Style

van Agtmaal, J. L., van Hoogstraten, S. W. G., & Arts, J. J. C. (2024). Prosthetic Joint Infection Research Models in NZW Rabbits: Opportunities for Standardization—A Systematic Review. Journal of Functional Biomaterials, 15(10), 307. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb15100307

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop