Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (25)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = propeller–wing interaction

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
25 pages, 21107 KB  
Article
CFD Aerodynamic Analysis of Tandem Tilt-Wing UAVs in Cruise Flight and Tilt Transition Flight
by Bin Xiang, Guoquan Tao, Long Jin, Jizheng Zhang and Jialin Chen
Drones 2025, 9(8), 522; https://doi.org/10.3390/drones9080522 - 24 Jul 2025
Viewed by 964
Abstract
The tandem tilt-wing UAV features an advanced aerodynamic layout design and is regarded as a solution for small-scale urban air mobility. However, the tandem wing configuration exhibits complex aerodynamic interactions between the front and rear wings during cruise flight and the wing tilt [...] Read more.
The tandem tilt-wing UAV features an advanced aerodynamic layout design and is regarded as a solution for small-scale urban air mobility. However, the tandem wing configuration exhibits complex aerodynamic interactions between the front and rear wings during cruise flight and the wing tilt transition process. The objective of this paper is to investigate the aerodynamic coupling characteristics between the front and rear wings of the tandem tilt-wing UAV under level flight and tilt transition conditions while also assessing the influence of the propellers on the aircraft’s aerodynamic performance. Through CFD numerical analysis, the aerodynamic characteristics of various aircraft components are examined at different angles of attack and wing tilt angles, and the underlying reasons for the observed differences and variations are explored. The results indicate that, during level flight, the aerodynamic interference between the wings is primarily dominated by the detrimental influence of the front wing on the rear wing. During the tilt transition process, mutual interactions between the front and rear wings occur as wing tilt angle changes, leading to more drastic variations in lift coefficients and increased control difficulty. However, the propeller’s effect contributes to smoother changes in lift and drag, thereby enhancing aircraft stability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Drone Design and Development)
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 6357 KB  
Review
Biomimetic Hydrofoil Propulsion: Harnessing the Propulsive Capabilities of Sea Turtles and Penguins for Robotics
by Yayi Shen, Zheming Ding, Xin Wang, Zebing Mao, Zhong Huang and Bai Chen
Biomimetics 2025, 10(5), 272; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics10050272 - 28 Apr 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1950
Abstract
This review synthesizes current research on hydrofoil-propelled robots inspired by the swimming mechanisms of sea turtles and penguins. It begins by summarizing the swimming kinematics of these organisms, highlighting their superior aquatic performance as the primary motivation for biomimetic design. Next, established analytical [...] Read more.
This review synthesizes current research on hydrofoil-propelled robots inspired by the swimming mechanisms of sea turtles and penguins. It begins by summarizing the swimming kinematics of these organisms, highlighting their superior aquatic performance as the primary motivation for biomimetic design. Next, established analytical methods for characterizing hydrofoil locomotion patterns are presented, along with a clear delineation of the decoupled motion components exhibited by sea turtle flippers and penguin wings. Such decoupling provides a systematic framework for guiding the design of driving mechanisms. Building on this biomechanical foundation, the review critically examines recent advances in biomimetic flexible hydrofoils that enhance propulsion efficiency through three synergistic mechanisms to enhance thrust generation, while identifying key challenges in material durability and non-linear fluid–structure interactions. The review then surveys existing hydrofoil actuation systems, which commonly reproduce coupled motions with multiple degrees of freedom (DOFs). Finally, representative biomimetic robots are examined: sea turtle-inspired forelimbs typically incorporate three DOFs, whereas penguin-inspired wings usually offer two DOFs. By aligning robotic designs with the decoupled motion patterns of the source organisms, this review offers critical insights to advance the development of hydrofoil propulsion systems for enhanced aquatic performance. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 5034 KB  
Article
Flight Dynamics Modeling and Verification for a Novel Compound Rotorcraft Considering Rotor/Propeller/Fuselage Aerodynamic Interference
by Xinfan Yin, Bowen Nie, Chang Wang, Honglei An, Shengde Jia, Hongxu Ma, Haoxuan Deng and Long He
Drones 2025, 9(5), 329; https://doi.org/10.3390/drones9050329 - 24 Apr 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1039
Abstract
The flight controllability and safety of unmanned compound rotorcraft are closely related to their aerodynamic characteristics. During forward flight, complex aerodynamic interference effects arise among the rotor, propeller, wing, fuselage, and horizontal–vertical tail. These interactions change dramatically with variations in forward speed, which [...] Read more.
The flight controllability and safety of unmanned compound rotorcraft are closely related to their aerodynamic characteristics. During forward flight, complex aerodynamic interference effects arise among the rotor, propeller, wing, fuselage, and horizontal–vertical tail. These interactions change dramatically with variations in forward speed, which may have a substantial impact on flight performance. This paper investigates aerodynamic interference related to the rotor, propeller, and fuselage of a sample unmanned compound rotorcraft with a novel configuration. On this basis, a flight dynamics model that incorporates the identified aerodynamic interference is formulated. Firstly, an analysis of rotor/propeller/fuselage aerodynamic interference is performed using the momentum source method (MSM). Subsequently, the aerodynamic models for the wing, fuselage, and horizontal–vertical tail are updated by integrating aerodynamic interference factors, leading to the development of a nonlinear flight dynamics model for the sample unmanned compound rotorcraft. Finally, to validate the updated flight dynamics model, numerical simulation results are systematically compared against wind tunnel test results. The results reveal a significant correlation between the numerical simulation data and wind tunnel test results, which indicates that the updated flight dynamics model possesses high accuracy and reliability and can characterize the dynamic characteristics of the sample unmanned compound rotorcraft within the flight speed envelope. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 12890 KB  
Article
Effects of Propeller Distribution on the Aeroelastic Characteristics of Large-Deformation Wings
by Xuan Wu, Zhou Zhou and Zhengping Wang
Aerospace 2024, 11(12), 971; https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11120971 - 26 Nov 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1203
Abstract
Considering the large-deformation and multi-propeller characteristics of very flexible aircraft, propeller effects are introduced and accessed in the wing static and dynamic aeroelastic analysis and different propeller distributions are utilized to obtain more aeroelastic benefits. The propeller–wing aeroelastic interactions are innovatively modeled in [...] Read more.
Considering the large-deformation and multi-propeller characteristics of very flexible aircraft, propeller effects are introduced and accessed in the wing static and dynamic aeroelastic analysis and different propeller distributions are utilized to obtain more aeroelastic benefits. The propeller–wing aeroelastic interactions are innovatively modeled in the paper. For propeller–wing aerodynamic interaction, propeller-induced velocities are considered and added in the nonplanar steady and unsteady vortex lattice methods. For propeller–wing structural interaction, the conversion of loads and displacements between attached propellers and the large-deformation wing is derived. Static aeroelastic cases indicate that thrust can reduce structural deformation and slipstream can cause considerable lift increment. Dynamic cases indicate that thrust can reduce the wing’s maximum response to gust and bring an improvement of 9.4% in the wing’s critical velocity, while slipstream can reduce the gust response amplitude. In addition, using smaller and more propellers is recommended instead of an individual larger propeller. Decreasing and increasing propeller speeds toward the wingtip is more beneficial for cruise status and gust alleviation, respectively. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Aeronautics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 4363 KB  
Article
Impact of Aerodynamic Interactions on Aeroelastic Stability of Wing-Propeller Systems
by Nils Böhnisch, Carsten Braun, Pier Marzocca and Vincenzo Muscarello
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(19), 8709; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14198709 - 26 Sep 2024
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2540
Abstract
This paper presents initial findings from aeroelastic studies conducted on a wing-propeller model, aimed at evaluating the impact of aerodynamic interactions on wing flutter mechanisms and overall aeroelastic performance. The flutter onset is assessed using a frequency-domain method. Mid-fidelity tools based on the [...] Read more.
This paper presents initial findings from aeroelastic studies conducted on a wing-propeller model, aimed at evaluating the impact of aerodynamic interactions on wing flutter mechanisms and overall aeroelastic performance. The flutter onset is assessed using a frequency-domain method. Mid-fidelity tools based on the time-domain approach are then exploited to account for the complex aerodynamic interaction between the propeller and the wing. Specifically, the open-source software DUST and MBDyn are leveraged for this purpose. The investigation covers both windmilling and thrusting conditions. During the trim process, adjustments to the collective pitch of the blades are made to ensure consistency across operational points. Time histories are then analyzed to pinpoint flutter onset, and corresponding frequencies and damping ratios are identified. The results reveal a marginal destabilizing effect of aerodynamic interaction on flutter speed, approximately 5%. Notably, the thrusting condition demonstrates a greater destabilizing influence compared to the windmilling case. These comprehensive findings enhance the understanding of the aerodynamic behavior of such systems and offer valuable insights for early design predictions and the development of streamlined models for future endeavors. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Unsteady Aerodynamics and Aeroelasticity)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 32031 KB  
Article
RANS-Based Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of a Wing with a Propeller in Front of the Wingtip
by Shamsheer S. Chauhan and Joaquim R. R. A. Martins
Aerospace 2024, 11(7), 512; https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11070512 - 25 Jun 2024
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2555
Abstract
Accounting for propeller–wing interaction allows for the design of more efficient propeller aircraft through strategic propulsion integration. In this paper, the cruise drag of a wing with a propeller located in front of the wingtip is minimized using twist and airfoil-shape design variables. [...] Read more.
Accounting for propeller–wing interaction allows for the design of more efficient propeller aircraft through strategic propulsion integration. In this paper, the cruise drag of a wing with a propeller located in front of the wingtip is minimized using twist and airfoil-shape design variables. Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes computational fluid dynamics with an actuator-disk approach is used for the flow simulations, and a gradient-based algorithm is used for the optimization. Changing the rotation direction of the propeller and optimizing the twist and airfoil shapes of the wing are found to impact the aerodynamic performance significantly, as expected. However, optimizing the wing while accounting for the propeller slipstream during optimization provides little benefit over optimizing it without accounting for the propeller slipstream—a difference of less than one drag count. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Aeronautics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 6782 KB  
Article
Aerodynamic Performance Assessment of Distributed Electric Propulsion after the Wing Trailing Edge
by Yao Lei and Xiangzheng Zhao
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(1), 280; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14010280 - 28 Dec 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1973
Abstract
Distributed electric propulsion (DEP) with four propellers distributed along the rear edge of the wing (pusher DEP configuration) promote aerodynamic interactions to a higher level. To study the aerodynamic performance of DEP with the rear wing through simulations and experiments, the multi-reference frame [...] Read more.
Distributed electric propulsion (DEP) with four propellers distributed along the rear edge of the wing (pusher DEP configuration) promote aerodynamic interactions to a higher level. To study the aerodynamic performance of DEP with the rear wing through simulations and experiments, the multi-reference frame (MRF) with sliding grid is combined with wind tunnel tests. The obtained results demonstrate that the lift and drag of DEP increase with the angle of attack (AoA) and are related to the relative position of the propellers and wing. The propeller has no significant effect on the lift of the wing, and the lift and the AoA remain linear when the AoA is less than 16°. By contrast, the lift coefficient is much higher than the baseline (isolated wing), and the lift is greatly improved with the increasing drag when the AoA is greater than 16°. This is because the flow around the wing of the pusher configuration remains attached due to the suction of the inflow of the propeller on the trailing edge vortex. In addition, the acceleration effect on the free flow improves the kinetic energy of the airflow, which effectively delays the separation of the airflow in the slipstream region. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Application of Aerodynamics in Aerospace)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 7902 KB  
Article
An Unsteady Reynolds–Averaged Navier–Stokes–Large Eddy Simulation Study of Propeller–Airframe Interaction in Distributed Electric Propulsion
by Omkar Walvekar and Satyanarayanan Chakravarthy
Aerospace 2024, 11(1), 17; https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11010017 - 24 Dec 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1962
Abstract
A conceptual framework is presented to determine the improvement in the aerodynamic performance of a canard aircraft fitted with distributed propellers along its main wing. A preliminary study is described with four airframe–propeller configurations predominantly studied in academic and commercial designs. The leading [...] Read more.
A conceptual framework is presented to determine the improvement in the aerodynamic performance of a canard aircraft fitted with distributed propellers along its main wing. A preliminary study is described with four airframe–propeller configurations predominantly studied in academic and commercial designs. The leading edge–based tractors and trailing edge–based pushers are identified as configurations of interest for the main study. Subsequently, a Navier–Stokes solver is used to simulate the flow using two numerical approaches–a modified steady-state actuator disk and an unsteady rotating propeller profile. Moving meshes with rotating sub-domains are used with a hybrid RANS-LES-based turbulence model while the actuator disks are modified to include viscous swirl effects. The preliminary study shows a local minimum in the change in CL and CD at 10 for the pusher and tractor configurations. The main study then demonstrates the outperformance of the pushers over tractors quantified using CL and CL/CD. There is a clear preference for the pushers as they increase the lifting capacity of the aircraft without disproportionately increasing the drag due to the flow smoothening by the suction of the pusher propellers over the main wing. The pushers also delay the separation of the boundary layer whereas the tractors are unable to prevent the formation of the separation bubble despite injecting momentum through their slipstreams into the flow. The results from the two numerical approaches are then compared for accuracy in designing DEP configurations for an airframe. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 15136 KB  
Article
Research on the Distributed Propeller Slipstream Effect of UAV Wing Based on the Actuator Disk Method
by Mingzhi Cao, Kun Liu, Chunqiang Wang, Jingbo Wei and Zijie Qin
Drones 2023, 7(9), 566; https://doi.org/10.3390/drones7090566 - 4 Sep 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2906
Abstract
Distributed electric propulsion technology has great potential and advantages in the development of drones. In this paper, to study the slipstream effect of distributed propellers, the actuator disk method was used to verify a single propeller, and the calculated thrust was in good [...] Read more.
Distributed electric propulsion technology has great potential and advantages in the development of drones. In this paper, to study the slipstream effect of distributed propellers, the actuator disk method was used to verify a single propeller, and the calculated thrust was in good agreement with the test results. Then, based on the actuator disk method, the influence of different installation positions on the slipstream effect was studied, and the distributed propeller layout was optimized by a genetic algorithm to improve the low-speed performance of the unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) during the take-off phase and increase the cruise duration. The analysis results showed that the lift of the wing will be larger when the propellers are higher than the wing. The wing lift and drag of the counter-rotating are less than those of the co-rotating. Compared with the original layout, the lift coefficient of the optimized distributed propeller layout is significantly increased by 30.97%, while the lift/drag ratio is increased by 7.34%. Finally, we designed the test platform and qualitatively verified the calculated results without quantitative verification. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 7048 KB  
Article
Conceptual Design and Optimization of Distributed Electric Propulsion General Aviation Aircraft
by Jiang Wu, Feng Gao, Shengwen Li and Fengtian Yang
Aerospace 2023, 10(5), 387; https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10050387 - 22 Apr 2023
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 4971
Abstract
The interaction between the slipstream of the propellers and the wing of an aircraft with distributed electric propulsion (DEP) could benefit aerodynamics. A conceptual design and optimization are carried out in order to increase the range of an electric general aviation aircraft without [...] Read more.
The interaction between the slipstream of the propellers and the wing of an aircraft with distributed electric propulsion (DEP) could benefit aerodynamics. A conceptual design and optimization are carried out in order to increase the range of an electric general aviation aircraft without affecting its takeoff and landing velocity in the same fuselage condition. Propellers are modelled using the actuator disk (AD) theory, and the aircraft is modelled using the vortex lattice method (VLM) to obtain DEP aircraft’s aerodynamics in conceptual design. The DIRECT method is used for global optimization. To concentrate on the layout of the propellers and wing, a propeller with the same chord distribution, twist distribution, and number of blades is selected. The design and optimization of DEP aircraft’s range is carried out with the objective of achieving the maximum product of the lift–drag ratio with propeller efficiency under force balance constrains. Additionally, to decrease the takeoff and landing distance, the DEP aircraft’s takeoff and landing performance are optimized with the objective of the smallest velocity at an angle near the tail down angle under the constrains of acceleration bigger than 0 and a Mach number at the tip of blades smaller than 0.7. The CFD simulation was used to confirm the DEP aircraft’s pretty accurate aerodynamics. Compared to the reference aircraft, the improved DEP aircraft with 10 high-lift propellers on the leading edge of the wing and 2 wing-tip propellers may boost cruise performance by 6% while maintaining takeoff and landing velocity. Furthermore, it has been shown that the stall speed of DEP aircraft with smaller wings would rise proportionally when compared to conventional design aircraft, and the power need of DEP aircraft will be increased as a result of the operation of high-lift propellers. The conceptual design and optimal approach suggested in this work has some reference value for the design and research of the fixed-wing DEP general aviation aircraft. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

42 pages, 16735 KB  
Article
Aero-Propulsive Interactions between UAV Wing and Distributed Propellers Due to Their Relative Position
by Danilo Ciliberti, Pierluigi Della Vecchia, Vincenzo Orticalco and Fabrizio Nicolosi
Drones 2023, 7(1), 49; https://doi.org/10.3390/drones7010049 - 11 Jan 2023
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 4611
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is the evaluation of the aero-propulsive effects on a UAV wing model with distributed propulsion. An array of three propellers is placed ahead of the leading edge of a rectangular wing with flap. The investigation was performed with [...] Read more.
The purpose of this paper is the evaluation of the aero-propulsive effects on a UAV wing model with distributed propulsion. An array of three propellers is placed ahead of the leading edge of a rectangular wing with flap. The investigation was performed with high-fidelity numerical analyses to provide insights into the phenomenology and to screen the interesting positions to be validated in the wind tunnel. The propellers’ array is moved into twelve different positions, allowing longitudinal and vertical translations. The wing has an untwisted and constant section profile, with a single slot trailing-edge flap that is deflected into three positions. The flap span is entirely covered by the propellers’ blowing. Results show an increment of lift, drag, and pitching moment coefficients with distributed propellers enabled. For a given thrust level, the magnitude of such increments depends on the propellers’ positions, the flap configuration, and the angle of attack. The lift enhancement sought in distributed propulsion applications comes at the expense of a significant increase in drag and pitching moment magnitude. In some combinations, the wing’s contribution to the aircraft longitudinal stability is severely affected. Conversely, the propellers’ inflow is altered such that thrust is increased in all the investigated configurations, with a small reduction of propulsive efficiency. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Drone Design and Development)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 6990 KB  
Article
Computational Fluid Dynamics Analyses of a Wing with Distributed Electric Propulsion
by Oreste Russo, Andrea Aprovitola, Donato de Rosa, Giuseppe Pezzella and Antonio Viviani
Aerospace 2023, 10(1), 64; https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10010064 - 8 Jan 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 4885
Abstract
The efficiency increase that distributed propulsion could deliver for future hybrid-electric aircraft is in line with the urgent demand for higher aerodynamic performances and a lower environmental impact. Several consolidated proprietary tools (not always available) are developed worldwide for distributed propulsion simulation. Therefore, [...] Read more.
The efficiency increase that distributed propulsion could deliver for future hybrid-electric aircraft is in line with the urgent demand for higher aerodynamic performances and a lower environmental impact. Several consolidated proprietary tools (not always available) are developed worldwide for distributed propulsion simulation. Therefore, prediction and comparisons of propeller performances, with computational fluid dynamic codes featuring different implementation of solvers, numerical schemes, and turbulence models, is of interest to a wider audience of research end-users. In this framework, the paper presents a cross-comparison study among different CFD solvers, the SU2 Multiphysics Simulation and Design Software, the CIRA proprietary flow solver UZEN, and the commercial ANSYS-FLUENT code, for the simulation of a wing section with a tractor propeller at different flow attitudes. The propeller is modelled as an actuator disk according to the general momentum theory and is accounted for in the flow solvers as a boundary condition, for the momentum and energy equations. In this study, a propeller with a fixed advance ratio J=0.63 is considered, while propeller performances are assumed variable along with the radius. To perform the comparisons among the solvers, an in-house procedure, which provides the input thrust and torque distributions in a unified format among the three solvers, is developed. Steady RANS simulations are performed at Re=1.7×106 and M=0.11, for the flowfield of an isolated propeller. Successively, a wing section with a fixed forward-mounted propeller configuration with no nacelle, is studied at α=0,4, and 8 angles of attack. The comparisons in terms of the lift coefficient show a good agreement among the three flow solvers both in power-off and power-on conditions. Simulations also evidenced the strong stability preserving property of upwind schemes, applied to propeller simulation at low-Mach number. Some discrepancies in the drag coefficient are observed and related to different levels of numerical diffusion between the three codes, which affects the downstream wake. Differences in flow properties in near disk region are observed and explained considering the different hub implementations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fluid Flow Mechanics (2nd Edition))
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 12102 KB  
Article
Influence of Aerodynamic Interaction on Performance of Contrarotating Propeller/Wing System
by Zhitao Zhang, Changchuan Xie, Kunhui Huang and Chao Yang
Aerospace 2022, 9(12), 813; https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace9120813 - 10 Dec 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2422
Abstract
This paper gives a quantitative account of the influence of slipstream on the aerodynamic performance of a contrarotating propeller (CRP)/wing system, and compares it with the CRP and clean wing. To accurately evaluate the complex aerodynamic interaction, the unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes approach using [...] Read more.
This paper gives a quantitative account of the influence of slipstream on the aerodynamic performance of a contrarotating propeller (CRP)/wing system, and compares it with the CRP and clean wing. To accurately evaluate the complex aerodynamic interaction, the unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes approach using the sliding mesh method is performed at a typical freestream velocity of 30 m/s. Four different critical parameters, including the freestream angle of attack (AoA), axial spacing between the front propeller (FP) and rear propeller (RP), number of blades, and rotational speed, are considered in the present work. The results show that the thrust coefficient, power coefficient, and propulsion efficiency of the CRP/wing system change sharply and the difference in amplitude between adjacent waves is large. In particular, the propeller slipstream has a significant impact on the lift–drag performance of the wing in the case of a nonzero AoA. The presence of a wing also increases the efficiency of propulsion due to the recovery of vortices. In the case of a small axial spacing, the thrust coefficient value of the FP is significantly smaller than that of the RP. However, when the axial spacing exceeds a certain value, the opposite relationship is obtained. When the rotational speed increases from 3695 RPM to 8867 RPM, the lift coefficient and drag coefficient of the wing gradually increase. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Aeronautics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 13290 KB  
Article
Aerodynamic Analysis of a Low-Speed Tandem-Channel Wing for eVTOL Aircraft Considering Propeller–Wing Interaction
by Min Chang, Zhongyuan Zheng, Xiaoxuan Meng, Junqiang Bai and Bo Wang
Energies 2022, 15(22), 8616; https://doi.org/10.3390/en15228616 - 17 Nov 2022
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 3536
Abstract
Fixed-wing aircraft with vertical takeoff and landing capabilities need a lower speed and a higher lift during transition. To meet these needs, a tandem-channel wing layout has been developed, including a FLR (front wing lower than rear wing) configuration and a FUR (front [...] Read more.
Fixed-wing aircraft with vertical takeoff and landing capabilities need a lower speed and a higher lift during transition. To meet these needs, a tandem-channel wing layout has been developed, including a FLR (front wing lower than rear wing) configuration and a FUR (front wing upper than rear wing) configuration, which differ in height differences between the front and rear wings. Numerical simulations have been performed to investigate the aerodynamic characteristics of the two configurations. The results show that a significant increase in lift coefficient occurs when the propeller rotational speed and the angle of attack increase. The lift at a small angle of attack increases by more than 50% at a high propeller rotational speed, and the stall angle of attack increases by more than 10 degrees. For the FLR configuration, the downwash effect of the front wing impacts the rear wing, decreasing the local angle of attack and delaying airflow separation on the top surface. For the FUR configuration, the up surface of the rear wing is induced by the wake flow of the front wing propeller at a high propeller rotational speed, which increases the lift and the stall angle of attack but makes the aircraft have static instability. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

49 pages, 16928 KB  
Article
Nature-Inspired Design and Advanced Multi-Computational Investigations on the Mission Profile of a Highly Manoeuvrable Unmanned Amphibious Vehicle for Ravage Removals in Various Oceanic Environments
by Vijayanandh Raja, Senthil Kumar Madasamy, Parvathy Rajendran, Sangeetha Ganesan, Dharshini Murugan, Hussein A. Z. AL-bonsrulah and Mohammed Al-Bahrani
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10(11), 1568; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10111568 - 22 Oct 2022
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 3862
Abstract
Recent large-scale operations, including frequent maritime transportation and unauthorised as well as unlawful collisions of drainage wastes, have polluted the ocean’s ecology. Due to the ocean’s unsuitable ecology, the entire globe may experience drastic aberrant conditions, which will force illness onto all living [...] Read more.
Recent large-scale operations, including frequent maritime transportation and unauthorised as well as unlawful collisions of drainage wastes, have polluted the ocean’s ecology. Due to the ocean’s unsuitable ecology, the entire globe may experience drastic aberrant conditions, which will force illness onto all living things. Therefore, an advanced system is very necessary to remove the undesired waste from the ocean’s surface and interior. Through the use of progressive unmanned amphibious vehicles (UAV), this study provides a dynamic operational mode-based solution to damage removal. In order to successfully handle the heavy payloads of ravage collections when the UAV reveals centre of gravity concerns, a highly manoeuvrable-based design inspired by nature has been imposed. The ideal creatures to serve as the inspiration for this piece are tropical birds, which have a long tail for navigating tricky situations. The design initialization was carried out by focusing on the outer body of tropical birds. Following this, special calculations were conducted and the full design parameters of the UAV were established. This study proposes a unique mathematical formulation for the development of primary and secondary design parameters of an UAV. The proposed mission profile of this application is computationally tested with the aid of sophisticated computational methodologies after the modelling of this UAV. The computational methods that are required are one-way coupling-based hydro-structural interaction assessments and computational hydrodynamic analyses. Computing is used to determine the aerodynamic and hydrodynamic forces over the UAV, the lightweight materials to withstand high fluid dynamic loads, and the buoyancy forces to complete the UAV components. These computational methods have been used to produce a flexible and fine-tuned UAV design for targeted real-time applications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Marine Vehicles, Automation and Robotics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop