Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (9)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = progesterone (PRG)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
25 pages, 5696 KiB  
Article
Whole-Genome Omics Elucidates the Role of CCM1 and Progesterone in Cerebral Cavernous Malformations within CmPn Networks
by Jacob Croft, Brian Grajeda, Liyuan Gao, Johnathan Abou-Fadel, Ahmed Badr, Victor Sheng and Jun Zhang
Diagnostics 2024, 14(17), 1895; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14171895 - 28 Aug 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1262
Abstract
Cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs) are abnormal expansions of brain capillaries that increase the risk of hemorrhagic strokes, with CCM1 mutations responsible for about 50% of familial cases. The disorder can cause irreversible brain damage by compromising the blood–brain barrier (BBB), leading to fatal [...] Read more.
Cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs) are abnormal expansions of brain capillaries that increase the risk of hemorrhagic strokes, with CCM1 mutations responsible for about 50% of familial cases. The disorder can cause irreversible brain damage by compromising the blood–brain barrier (BBB), leading to fatal brain hemorrhages. Studies show that progesterone and its derivatives significantly impact BBB integrity. The three CCM proteins (CCM1, CCM2, and CCM3) form the CCM signaling complex (CSC), linking classic and non-classic progesterone signaling within the CmPn network, which is crucial for maintaining BBB integrity. This study aimed to explore the relationship between CCM1 and key pathways of the CmPn signaling network using three mouse embryonic fibroblast lines (MEFs) with distinct CCM1 expressions. Omics and systems biology analysis investigated CCM1-mediated signaling within the CmPn network. Our findings reveal that CCM1 is essential for regulating cellular processes within progesterone-mediated CmPn/CmP signaling, playing a crucial role in maintaining microvessel integrity. This regulation occurs partly through gene transcription control. The critical role of CCM1 in these processes suggests it could be a promising therapeutic target for CCMs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vascular Malformations: Diagnosis and Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 893 KiB  
Review
CmPn/CmP Signaling Networks in the Maintenance of the Blood Vessel Barrier
by Revathi Gnanasekaran, Justin Aickareth, Majd Hawwar, Nickolas Sanchez, Jacob Croft and Jun Zhang
J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13(5), 751; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13050751 - 28 Apr 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3225
Abstract
Cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs) arise when capillaries within the brain enlarge abnormally, causing the blood–brain barrier (BBB) to break down. The BBB serves as a sophisticated interface that controls molecular interactions between the bloodstream and the central nervous system. The neurovascular unit (NVU) [...] Read more.
Cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs) arise when capillaries within the brain enlarge abnormally, causing the blood–brain barrier (BBB) to break down. The BBB serves as a sophisticated interface that controls molecular interactions between the bloodstream and the central nervous system. The neurovascular unit (NVU) is a complex structure made up of neurons, astrocytes, endothelial cells (ECs), pericytes, microglia, and basement membranes, which work together to maintain blood–brain barrier (BBB) permeability. Within the NVU, tight junctions (TJs) and adherens junctions (AJs) between endothelial cells play a critical role in regulating the permeability of the BBB. Disruptions to these junctions can compromise the BBB, potentially leading to a hemorrhagic stroke. Understanding the molecular signaling cascades that regulate BBB permeability through EC junctions is, therefore, essential. New research has demonstrated that steroids, including estrogens (ESTs), glucocorticoids (GCs), and metabolites/derivatives of progesterone (PRGs), have multifaceted effects on blood–brain barrier (BBB) permeability by regulating the expression of tight junctions (TJs) and adherens junctions (AJs). They also have anti-inflammatory effects on blood vessels. PRGs, in particular, have been found to play a significant role in maintaining BBB integrity. PRGs act through a combination of its classic and non-classic PRG receptors (nPR/mPR), which are part of a signaling network known as the CCM signaling complex (CSC). This network couples both nPR and mPR in the CmPn/CmP pathway in endothelial cells (ECs). Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

29 pages, 10037 KiB  
Article
Key Members of the CmPn as Biomarkers Distinguish Histological and Immune Subtypes of Hepatic Cancers
by Johnathan Abou-Fadel, Victoria Reid, Alexander Le, Jacob Croft and Jun Zhang
Diagnostics 2023, 13(6), 1012; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13061012 - 7 Mar 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2774
Abstract
Liver cancer, comprising hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The liver is a primary metabolic organ for progesterone (PRG) and PRG exerts its effects through classic nuclear PRG receptors (nPRs) and non-classic membrane PRG receptors [...] Read more.
Liver cancer, comprising hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The liver is a primary metabolic organ for progesterone (PRG) and PRG exerts its effects through classic nuclear PRG receptors (nPRs) and non-classic membrane PRG receptors (mPRs) or a combination of both. Previous studies have shown that the CCM signaling complex (CSC) couples both nPRs and mPRs to form the CmPn (CSC-mPR-PRG-nPR) signaling network, which is involved in multiple cellular signaling pathways, including tumorigenesis of various cancers. Despite advances in treatment, 5-year survival rates for liver cancer patients remain low, largely due to the chemoresistant nature of HCCs. The lack of sensitive and specific biomarkers for liver cancer diagnosis and prognosis emphasizes the need for identifying new potential biomarkers. We propose the potential use of CmPn members’ expression data as prognostic biomarkers or biomarker signatures for the major types of hepatic cancer, including HCCs and CCAs, as well as rare subtypes such as undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) and hepatic angiosarcoma (HAS). In this study, we investigated the CmPn network through RNAseq data and immunofluorescence techniques to measure alterations to key cancer pathways during liver tumorigenesis. Our findings reveal significant differential expression of multiple CmPn members, including CCM1, PAQR7, PGRMC1, and nPRs, in both HCCs and CCAs, highlighting the crucial roles of mPRs, nPRs, and CSC signaling during liver tumorigenesis. These key members of the CmPn network may serve as potential biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of liver cancer subtypes, including rare subtypes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Measurements and Standards for Cancer Biomarkers in Clinical Testing)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

15 pages, 685 KiB  
Review
Membrane Progesterone Receptors (mPRs/PAQRs) Are Going beyond Its Initial Definitions
by Justin Aickareth, Majd Hawwar, Nickolas Sanchez, Revathi Gnanasekaran and Jun Zhang
Membranes 2023, 13(3), 260; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13030260 - 22 Feb 2023
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 4274
Abstract
Progesterone (PRG) is a key cyclical reproductive hormone that has a significant impact on female organs in vertebrates. It is mainly produced by the corpus luteum of the ovaries, but can also be generated from other sources such as the adrenal cortex, Leydig [...] Read more.
Progesterone (PRG) is a key cyclical reproductive hormone that has a significant impact on female organs in vertebrates. It is mainly produced by the corpus luteum of the ovaries, but can also be generated from other sources such as the adrenal cortex, Leydig cells of the testes and neuronal and glial cells. PRG has wide-ranging physiological effects, including impacts on metabolic systems, central nervous systems and reproductive systems in both genders. It was first purified as an ovarian steroid with hormonal function for pregnancy, and is known to play a role in pro-gestational proliferation during pregnancy. The main function of PRG is exerted through its binding to progesterone receptors (nPRs, mPRs/PAQRs) to evoke cellular responses through genomic or non-genomic signaling cascades. Most of the existing research on PRG focuses on classic PRG-nPR-paired actions such as nuclear transcriptional factors, but new evidence suggests that PRG also exerts a wide range of PRG actions through non-classic membrane PRG receptors, which can be divided into two sub-classes: mPRs/PAQRs and PGRMCs. The review will concentrate on recently found non-classical membrane progesterone receptors (mainly mPRs/PAQRs) and speculate their connections, utilizing the present comprehension of progesterone receptors. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 693 KiB  
Review
Zinc’s Association with the CmPn/CmP Signaling Network in Breast Cancer Tumorigenesis
by Mellisa Renteria, Ofek Belkin, Justin Aickareth, David Jang, Majd Hawwar and Jun Zhang
Biomolecules 2022, 12(11), 1672; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12111672 - 11 Nov 2022
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 2473
Abstract
It is well-known that serum and cellular concentrations of zinc are altered in breast cancer patients. Specifically, there are notable zinc hyper-aggregates in breast tumor cells when compared to normal mammary epithelial cells. However, the mechanisms responsible for zinc accumulation and the consequences [...] Read more.
It is well-known that serum and cellular concentrations of zinc are altered in breast cancer patients. Specifically, there are notable zinc hyper-aggregates in breast tumor cells when compared to normal mammary epithelial cells. However, the mechanisms responsible for zinc accumulation and the consequences of zinc dysregulation are poorly understood. In this review, we detailed cellular zinc regulation/dysregulation under the influence of varying levels of sex steroids and breast cancer tumorigenesis to try to better understand the intricate relationship between these factors based on our current understanding of the CmPn/CmP signaling network. We also made some efforts to propose a relationship between zinc signaling and the CmPn/CmP signaling network. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Zinc in Health and Disease Conditions)
Show Figures

Figure 1

33 pages, 6833 KiB  
Article
mPR-Specific Actions Influence Maintenance of the Blood–Brain Barrier (BBB)
by Johnathan Abou-Fadel, Xiaoting Jiang, Akhil Padarti, Dinesh G. Goswami, Mark Smith, Brian Grajeda, Muaz Bhalli, Alexander Le, Wendy E. Walker and Jun Zhang
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(17), 9684; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23179684 - 26 Aug 2022
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 2881
Abstract
Cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs) are characterized by abnormally dilated intracranial microvascular sinusoids that result in increased susceptibility to hemorrhagic stroke. It has been demonstrated that three CCM proteins (CCM1, CCM2, and CCM3) form the CCM signaling complex (CSC) to mediate angiogenic signaling. Disruption [...] Read more.
Cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs) are characterized by abnormally dilated intracranial microvascular sinusoids that result in increased susceptibility to hemorrhagic stroke. It has been demonstrated that three CCM proteins (CCM1, CCM2, and CCM3) form the CCM signaling complex (CSC) to mediate angiogenic signaling. Disruption of the CSC will result in hemorrhagic CCMs, a consequence of compromised blood–brain barrier (BBB) integrity. Due to their characteristically incomplete penetrance, the majority of CCM mutation carriers (presumed CCM patients) are largely asymptomatic, but when symptoms occur, the disease has typically reached a clinical stage of focal hemorrhage with irreversible brain damage. We recently reported that the CSC couples both classic (nuclear; nPRs) and nonclassic (membrane; mPRs) progesterone (PRG)-receptors-mediated signaling within the CSC-mPRs-PRG (CmP) signaling network in nPR(−) breast cancer cells. In this report, we demonstrate that depletion of any of the three CCM genes or treatment with mPR-specific PRG actions (PRG/mifepristone) results in the disruption of the CmP signaling network, leading to increased permeability in the nPR(−) endothelial cells (ECs) monolayer in vitro. Finally, utilizing our in vivo hemizygous Ccm mutant mice models, we demonstrate that depletion of any of the three CCM genes, in combination with mPR-specific PRG actions, is also capable of leading to defective homeostasis of PRG in vivo and subsequent BBB disruption, allowing us to identify a specific panel of etiological blood biomarkers associated with BBB disruption. To our knowledge, this is the first report detailing the etiology to predict the occurrence of a disrupted BBB, an indication of early hemorrhagic events. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Feature Papers in “Molecular Biology”)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 703 KiB  
Review
The Divergent Effects of Ovarian Steroid Hormones in the MCF-7 Model for Luminal A Breast Cancer: Mechanistic Leads for Therapy
by Nitin T. Telang
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(9), 4800; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23094800 - 27 Apr 2022
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 3193
Abstract
The growth modulating effects of the ovarian steroid hormones 17β-estradiol (E2) and progesterone (PRG) on endocrine-responsive target tissues are well established. In hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer, E2 functions as a potent growth promoter, while the function of PRG is less defined. [...] Read more.
The growth modulating effects of the ovarian steroid hormones 17β-estradiol (E2) and progesterone (PRG) on endocrine-responsive target tissues are well established. In hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer, E2 functions as a potent growth promoter, while the function of PRG is less defined. In the hormone-receptor-positive Luminal A and Luminal B molecular subtypes of clinical breast cancer, conventional endocrine therapy predominantly targets estrogen receptor function and estrogen biosynthesis and/or growth factor receptors. These therapeutic options are associated with systemic toxicity, acquired tumor resistance, and the emergence of drug-resistant cancer stem cells, facilitating the progression of therapy-resistant disease. The limitations of targeted endocrine therapy emphasize the identification of nontoxic testable alternatives. In the human breast, carcinoma-derived hormone-receptor-positive MCF-7 model treatment with E2 within the physiological concentration range of 1 nM to 20 nM induces progressive growth, upregulated cell cycle progression, and downregulated cellular apoptosis. In contrast, treatment with PRG at the equimolar concentration range exhibits dose-dependent growth inhibition, downregulated cell-cycle progression, and upregulated cellular apoptosis. Nontoxic nutritional herbs at their respective maximum cytostatic concentrations (IC90) effectively increase the E2 metabolite ratio in favor of the anti-proliferative metabolite. The long-term exposure to the selective estrogen-receptor modulator tamoxifen selects a drug-resistant phenotype, exhibiting increased expressions of stem cell markers. The present review discusses the published evidence relevant to hormone metabolism, growth modulation by hormone metabolites, drug-resistant stem cells, and growth-inhibitory efficacy of nutritional herbs. Collectively, this evidence provides proof of the concept for future research directions that are focused on novel therapeutic options for endocrine therapy-resistant breast cancer that may operate via E2- and/or PRG-mediated growth regulation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 2112 KiB  
Article
The Modulation of Functional Status of Bovine Spermatozoa by Progesterone
by Vitaly Denisenko, Irena Chistyakova, Natalia Volkova, Ludmila Volkova, Baylar Iolchiev and Tatyana Kuzmina
Animals 2021, 11(6), 1788; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11061788 - 15 Jun 2021
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3490
Abstract
The aim of this study is to identify the effects of progesterone (PRG) on the capacitation and the acrosome reaction in bovine spermatozoa. The fresh sperm samples were incubated with and without capacitation inductors (heparin, dibutyryl cyclic adenosine monophosphate (dbcAMP)), hormones (prolactin (PRL), [...] Read more.
The aim of this study is to identify the effects of progesterone (PRG) on the capacitation and the acrosome reaction in bovine spermatozoa. The fresh sperm samples were incubated with and without capacitation inductors (heparin, dibutyryl cyclic adenosine monophosphate (dbcAMP)), hormones (prolactin (PRL), PRG), inhibitors of microfilaments (cytochalasin D) and microtubules (nocodazole) during capacitation and acrosome reactions. The functional status of spermatozoa was examined using the chlortetracycline assay. Supplementation of heparin stimulated capacitation in the presence and absence of PRG. Cytochalasin D blocked the stimulating effect of heparin on capacitation. The addition of PRL during capacitation (without PRG) did not affect the functional status of spermatozoa, while in PRG-treated cells PRL stimulated the acrosome reaction. PRL (with and without PRG) increased the acrosome reaction in capacitated cells. These PRL-dependent effects were inhibited by nocodazole. During the acrosome reaction, in presence of dbcAMP, PRG decreased the proportion of acrosome-reacted cells compared to PRG-untreated cells. This effect in PRG-treated cells was canceled in the presence of nocodazole. In conclusion, PRG under the action of PRL and dbcAMP determines the changes in the functional status of native sperm cells, which indicates PRG modulating effect on the indicators of post-ejaculatory maturation of spermatozoa. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights into Animal Spermatogenesis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1883 KiB  
Article
A Sensitive Impedimetric Aptasensor Based on Carbon Nanodots Modified Electrode for Detection of 17ß-Estradiol
by Mohd Hazani Mat Zaid, Jaafar Abdullah, Normazida Rozi, Aliff Aiman Mohamad Rozlan and Sharina Abu Hanifah
Nanomaterials 2020, 10(7), 1346; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10071346 - 10 Jul 2020
Cited by 39 | Viewed by 4166
Abstract
A simple and sensitive aptasensor based on conductive carbon nanodots (CDs) was fabricated for the detection of 17ß-Estradiol (E2). In the present study, the hydrothermal synthesis of carbon nanodots was successfully electrodeposited on a screen-printed electrode (SPE) as a platform for immobilization of [...] Read more.
A simple and sensitive aptasensor based on conductive carbon nanodots (CDs) was fabricated for the detection of 17ß-Estradiol (E2). In the present study, the hydrothermal synthesis of carbon nanodots was successfully electrodeposited on a screen-printed electrode (SPE) as a platform for immobilization of 76-mer aptamer probe. The morphology and structure of the nanomaterial were characterized by UV-visible absorption spectra, Fluorescence spectra, Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Moreover, cyclic voltammetry and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy were used to investigate the electrochemical performance of the prepared electrodes. Subsequently, impedimetric (EIS) measurements were employed to investigate the relative impedances changes before and after E2 binding, which results in a linear relationship of E2 concentration in the range of 1.0 × 10−7 to 1.0 × 10 −12 M, with a detection limit of 0.5 × 10−12 M. Moreover, the developed biosensor showed high selectivity toward E2 and exhibited excellent discrimination against progesterone (PRG), estriol (E3) and bisphenol A (BPA), respectively. Moreover, the average recovery rate of spiked river water samples with E2 ranged from 98.2% to 103.8%, with relative standard deviations between 1.1% and 3.8%, revealing the potential application of the present biosensor for E2 detection in water samples. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop