Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (6,246)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = post-COVID

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
37 pages, 801 KB  
Systematic Review
A Systematic Review of Urban Heat Island (UHI) Impacts and Mitigation: Health, Equity, and Policy
by Zhenzhu Zheng, Chng Saun Fong, Nasrin Aghamohammadi and Yoo Kee Law
Systems 2026, 14(1), 82; https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14010082 - 12 Jan 2026
Abstract
Urban heat islands pose intensifying threats to public health, equity, and urban livability as climate change amplifies temperature extremes. This systematic review synthesizes evidence from 33 primary studies (2021–2025) examining health impacts, mitigation strategies, and policy integration. The analysis focuses on interaction mechanisms, [...] Read more.
Urban heat islands pose intensifying threats to public health, equity, and urban livability as climate change amplifies temperature extremes. This systematic review synthesizes evidence from 33 primary studies (2021–2025) examining health impacts, mitigation strategies, and policy integration. The analysis focuses on interaction mechanisms, specifically how mitigation strategies differentially reduce health burdens across vulnerable populations, to advance systems-level understanding of urban heat dynamics. Following PRISMA guidelines, the review examined these mechanisms across three interconnected domains: health burdens, physical mitigation effectiveness, and post-pandemic policy synergies. Findings reveal profound inequities in heat exposure and associated health outcomes, with disadvantaged populations experiencing 26–45% higher heat-related mortality risk and 3–4 °C greater exposure than affluent communities, even after controlling for income. Physical mitigation strategies show measurable effectiveness, providing 1–6 °C cooling from green infrastructure and 2–22 °C from cool surfaces. Optimal interventions vary by socioeconomic context, with urban trees being more effective in disadvantaged areas, while cool roofs are better suited to affluent zones. COVID-19 natural experiments demonstrated 30–50% anthropogenic heat reductions, revealing strategic opportunities for integrating heat mitigation with 15-Minute City planning and work-from-home normalization. Effective implementation requires moving beyond isolated interventions toward spatially differentiated, equity-centered strategies aligned across planning, transportation, and governance domains. The post-pandemic period presents a critical window for embedding heat mitigation into broader urban transformation agendas. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 4818 KB  
Article
Temporal Trends in Lower Respiratory Infection Mortality in Ecuador, 2012–2022
by Reena Krishna, Luis Furuya-Kanamori and Harriet L. S. Lawford
Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2026, 11(1), 21; https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed11010021 - 12 Jan 2026
Abstract
Lower respiratory infections (LRIs) are responsible for significant morbidity and mortality in Ecuador; however, evidence to support prevention strategies is limited. This study aimed to identify age-specific trends, spatial patterns, and sociodemographic risk factors of LRI mortality in Ecuador between 2012–2022, utilizing national [...] Read more.
Lower respiratory infections (LRIs) are responsible for significant morbidity and mortality in Ecuador; however, evidence to support prevention strategies is limited. This study aimed to identify age-specific trends, spatial patterns, and sociodemographic risk factors of LRI mortality in Ecuador between 2012–2022, utilizing national mortality data sourced from the Ecuadorian National Institute for Statistics and Censuses (INEC). Age-sex-specific trend analysis was performed using Joinpoint regression. LRI age-standardized mortality rates (ASMRs) were mapped by province of death, and percentage change was calculated between 2012 and 2019. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess risk factors pre- and post-2020. A change in trend in LRI mortality rate, from a decreasing trend to a marginal increasing trend, was identified for both genders in children aged 0–4 and 5–15 years. There were significant increasing trends for males (2014–2019 APC: 2.21%, 95% CI: 0.57, 6.70) and females (2016–2019 APC: 4.62%, 95% CI: 0.84, 10.58) aged ≥ 70 years. From 2012 to 2019, the highest average LRI ASMR was in Guayas (30.90 deaths per 100,000 inhabitants), and the greatest percentage increase was observed in Orellana (419.54%). Before 2020, LRI mortality, compared to deaths of other causes, was significantly associated with sex, age, education, ethnicity, place of death and climate region, with major shifts post COVID-19 pandemic. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Respiratory Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1318 KB  
Article
A Retrospective Observational Study of Pulmonary Impairments in Long COVID Patients
by Lanre Peter Daodu, Yogini Raste, Judith E. Allgrove, Francesca I. F. Arrigoni and Reem Kayyali
Biomedicines 2026, 14(1), 145; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines14010145 - 10 Jan 2026
Viewed by 97
Abstract
Background/Objective: Pulmonary impairments have been identified as some of the most complex and debilitating post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC) or long COVID. This study identified and characterised the specific forms of pulmonary impairments detected using pulmonary function tests (PFT), chest X-rays (CXR), [...] Read more.
Background/Objective: Pulmonary impairments have been identified as some of the most complex and debilitating post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC) or long COVID. This study identified and characterised the specific forms of pulmonary impairments detected using pulmonary function tests (PFT), chest X-rays (CXR), and computed tomography (CT) scans in patients with long COVID symptoms. Methods: We conducted a single-centre retrospective study to evaluate 60 patients with long COVID who underwent PFT, CXR, and CT scans. Pulmonary function in long COVID patients was assessed using defined thresholds for key test parameters, enabling categorisation into normal, restrictive, obstructive, and mixed lung-function patterns. We applied exact binomial (Clopper–Pearson) 95% confidence intervals to calculate the proportions of patients falling below the defined thresholds. We also assessed the relationships among spirometric indices, lung volumes, and diffusion capacity (DLCO) using scatter plots and corresponding linear regressions. The findings from the CXRs and CT scans were categorised, and their prevalence was calculated. Results: A total of 60 patients with long COVID symptoms (mean age 60 ± 13 years; 57% female) were evaluated. The cohort was ethnically diverse and predominantly non-smokers, with a mean BMI of 32.4 ± 6.3 kg/m2. PFT revealed that most patients had preserved spirometry, with mean Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) and Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) above 90% predicted. However, a significant proportion exhibited reductions in lung volumes, with total lung capacity (TLC) decreasing in 35%, and diffusion capacity (DLCO/TLCO) decreasing in 75%. Lung function pattern analysis showed 88% of patients had normal function, while 12% displayed a restrictive pattern; no obstructive or mixed patterns were observed. Radiographic assessment revealed that 58% of chest X-rays were normal, whereas CT scans showed ground-glass opacities (GGO) in 65% of patients and fibrotic changes in 55%, along with findings such as atelectasis, air trapping, and bronchial wall thickening. Conclusions: Spirometry alone is insufficient to detect impairment of gas exchange or underlying histopathological changes in patients with long COVID. Our findings show that, despite normal spirometry results, many patients exhibit significant diffusion impairment, fibrotic alterations, and ground-glass opacities, indicating persistent lung and microvascular damage. These results underscore the importance of comprehensive assessment using multiple diagnostic tools to identify and manage chronic pulmonary dysfunction in long COVID. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

12 pages, 541 KB  
Article
Changes in Alcohol-Based Handrub Usage Among Hospital Staff Four Years After the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Single-Centre Observational Time-Series Study
by Filip Waligóra, Anastazja Tobolewska-Kielar and Maciej Kielar
Healthcare 2026, 14(2), 177; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14020177 - 9 Jan 2026
Viewed by 74
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Alcohol-based handrub (ABHR) consumption is commonly used as an indirect proxy for hand hygiene practices. Hand hygiene compliance increased significantly during COVID-19, but sustainability remains uncertain. This study assessed ABHR consumption trends from 2022 to 2024 and compared them with pre-pandemic [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Alcohol-based handrub (ABHR) consumption is commonly used as an indirect proxy for hand hygiene practices. Hand hygiene compliance increased significantly during COVID-19, but sustainability remains uncertain. This study assessed ABHR consumption trends from 2022 to 2024 and compared them with pre-pandemic and pandemic-era rates. Methods: We conducted a follow-up observational study tracking quarterly ABHR consumption in a surgical department and hospital-wide (2022–2024). Consumption was normalized as mL per patient-day and compared with 2019–2020 data. Time-series regression with Newey–West standard errors assessed temporal trends. Results: Surgical department consumption declined 27.5% (55.9 to 40.5 mL/patient-day), returning to 2019 pre-pandemic levels. Hospital-wide consumption increased 36% (36.4 to 49.6 mL/patient-day). Neither trend reached statistical significance (p > 0.05). The 2024 surgical rate remained substantially below the 2020 pandemic peak (320 mL/patient-day). Conclusions: Pandemic-era ABHR consumption gains were not sustained in the surgical department despite maintained educational infrastructure, accessible dispensers, and consistent staffing. The critical missing element was systematic monitoring and feedback. Institutions relying solely on passive education may experience erosion of hand hygiene compliance post-crisis, highlighting the need for active surveillance programs to maintain behavioral gains. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 1461 KB  
Article
Impact of Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Physical, Mental Health and Quality of Life in Children with Post-COVID-19 Condition: A 12-Month Quasi-Experimental Study
by Aroia Goicoechea-Calvo, Natalia Navarro Expósito, Roser Coll-Fernández, Marc Colomer Giralt, Alberto Martín Saavedra, Alba González-Aumatell, María Méndez-Hernández, Clara Carreras-Abad, Mónica Moreira, Maria Giralt-López, Natàlia Pallarès, Cristian Tebe Cordomi, Agustí Rodríguez-Palmero, Carlos Rodrigo and Maria José Durà Mata
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(2), 535; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15020535 - 9 Jan 2026
Viewed by 70
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Evidence on pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in paediatric post-COVID-19 condition (PPCC) is scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the association of a PR programme with changes in physical and mental health and quality of life in PPCC over a 12-month follow-up. Methods: A [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Evidence on pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in paediatric post-COVID-19 condition (PPCC) is scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the association of a PR programme with changes in physical and mental health and quality of life in PPCC over a 12-month follow-up. Methods: A quasi-experimental pre–post single-arm study was conducted, with no control group, in PPCC patients attending an outpatient PR unit. The primary outcome was change in exercise capacity (6 min walk test, 6MWT). Secondary outcomes included inspiratory and peripheral muscle strength, quadriceps muscle morphology by ultrasound, fatigue, physical activity, quality of life, and psychiatric symptoms, assessed using validated paediatric instruments. Results: A total of 115 PPCC patients (mean age 13.3 years; 66.1% female) completed the PR. 6MWD distance increased from 509 ± 87 to 546 ± 86 (+37 m; p < 0.001; D: 0.50). Handgrip strength increased by 2.4 kg, maximal inspiratory pressure increased by 15 cmH2O, physical activity increased by 2.4 points, fatigue score improved by 9.3 points, and quality of life improved by 11 points (all p < 0.001). Rectus femoris thickness increased by 0.56 mm (p = 0.005), psychiatric symptom scores decreased by 4.5 points (p < 0.001), and rectus femoris echo-intensity decreased (p = 0.003). Conclusions: Multidisciplinary PR appears feasible and potentially effective in improving physical function, psychological well-being, and quality of life in PPCC, supporting the need for evidence-based paediatric rehabilitation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue POTS, ME/CFS and Long COVID: Recent Advances and Future Direction)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 413 KB  
Article
Persistence of Symptoms and Long-Term Recovery in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: Results from a Five-Year Follow-Up Cohort
by Ana Roel Conde, Francisco Javier Membrillo de Novales, María Navarro Téllez, Carlos Gutiérrez Ortega and Miriam Estébanez Muñoz
Infect. Dis. Rep. 2026, 18(1), 8; https://doi.org/10.3390/idr18010008 - 9 Jan 2026
Viewed by 71
Abstract
Background/Objectives: This study aimed to determine the prevalence of persistent symptoms and the radiological and laboratory evolution at 6 months and 5 years after discharge in patients hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia during the first wave of the pandemic in Spain and to estimate [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: This study aimed to determine the prevalence of persistent symptoms and the radiological and laboratory evolution at 6 months and 5 years after discharge in patients hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia during the first wave of the pandemic in Spain and to estimate the healthcare impact of their follow-up. Methods: A retrospective longitudinal observational study was conducted at the “Hospital Central de la Defensa”. A total of 200 patients aged >18 years with a diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia were screened. Clinical, radiological, and laboratory data were collected from electronic medical records. Patients with symptoms or radiological abnormalities at discharge underwent in-person evaluations, while the remainder were assessed by telephone. Results: A total of 182 patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of these, 112 were assessed in the outpatient setting; 60.7% required in-person evaluations, with normal pulmonary auscultation in 93.6%, complete radiological resolution in 85%, and normalized laboratory parameters in almost all cases. At 6 months, 26.5% presented at least one residual symptom, whereas only three patients (4.5%) reported symptoms at 5 years. No risk factors associated with symptom persistence were identified. The estimated cumulative healthcare cost was EUR 21,627.50. Conclusions: Among patients hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia during the first wave of the pandemic, 26.7% and 4.46% presented at least one persistent symptom at 6 months and 5 years after discharge, respectively. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Viral Infections)
Show Figures

Figure 1

30 pages, 1851 KB  
Review
Telehealth for Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare: Evidence Map of Effectiveness, Patient and Provider Experiences and Preferences, and Patient Engagement Strategies
by Romil R. Parikh, Nishka U. Shetty, Chinar Singhal, Prachi Patel, Priyanka Manghani, Ashwin A. Pillai, Luz Angela Chocontá-Piraquive and Mary E. Butler
Clin. Pract. 2026, 16(1), 14; https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract16010014 - 9 Jan 2026
Viewed by 101
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to systematically map evidence to inform best practices for sexual and reproductive healthcare delivered via telehealth (TeleSRH) in United States-based Title X-funded clinics. Methods: We searched three databases (2017–2025) for studies evaluating effectiveness, harms, patient and [...] Read more.
Objective: The aim of this study was to systematically map evidence to inform best practices for sexual and reproductive healthcare delivered via telehealth (TeleSRH) in United States-based Title X-funded clinics. Methods: We searched three databases (2017–2025) for studies evaluating effectiveness, harms, patient and provider experiences, barriers/facilitators, and engagement strategies encompassing TeleSRH for sexually transmitted infections (STIs), contraceptive care/family planning (CC/FP), and sexual wellness, in countries with a human development index of ≥0.8. Results: From 5963 references and 436 articles, we included 142 eligible publications. TeleSRH use declined since the COVID-19 pandemic’s peak but remains higher than pre-pandemic. Evidence comes mostly from poor-quality studies. TeleSRH increases access and adherence to STI prevention (e.g., pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV). Tele-follow-up may safely facilitate HIV care continuity. For CC/FP, TeleSRH is comparable to in-person care for patient satisfaction and uptake; patients are less likely to select long-acting reversible contraception but post-initiation tele-follow-up may increase its continuation rates. Vasectomy completion rates may be similar between pre-procedural counseling via telehealth versus in-person. TeleSRH’s potential benefits might include reduced travel time, wait times, no-show rates, and clinic human resource burden (via tele-triaging) and increased preventative screening rates for STIs and non-communicable diseases, prescription refill rates, ability to receive confidential care in preferred settings, and rural/marginalized community outreach. Implementation challenges span technological and capital constraints, provider availability, staff capability building, restrictive policies, language incompatibility, and patient mistrust. Supplementing synchronous TeleSRH with asynchronous communication (e.g., mobile application) may improve continued patient engagement. Conclusions: Preventive, diagnostic, and therapeutic TeleSRH can be effective, with high patient acceptability; however, effectiveness and adoption hinge on contextual factors outlined in this review. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 4833 KB  
Article
CRHR1 Gene Copy Number Variations, Chronic Viral Infections, and Age as Correlates of Cognitive Impairment in Adults After SARS-CoV-2 Infection
by Yekaterina Hovhannisyan, Hermine Yeritsyan, Hayk Harutyunyan, Allen Azizian and Konstantin Yenkoyan
Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2026, 48(1), 69; https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb48010069 - 8 Jan 2026
Viewed by 88
Abstract
Cognitive impairment is a frequent but heterogeneous consequence of SARS-CoV-2 infection, with objective cognitive deficits not always aligning with subjective cognitive complaints. Age, nutritional status, and stress-related biological pathways may contribute to this variability. The corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor 1 (CRHR1), a key regulator [...] Read more.
Cognitive impairment is a frequent but heterogeneous consequence of SARS-CoV-2 infection, with objective cognitive deficits not always aligning with subjective cognitive complaints. Age, nutritional status, and stress-related biological pathways may contribute to this variability. The corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor 1 (CRHR1), a key regulator of stress and neuroendocrine responses, represents a biologically plausible candidate for post-infection cognitive vulnerability. In this pilot case–control study, we investigated associations between CRHR1 copy number variations (CNVs), prior viral exposures, and cognitive outcomes in adults following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Objective cognitive performance was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and RBANS, alongside evaluation of subjective cognitive complaints and depressive symptoms. Analyses accounted for age and circulating levels of vitamins B12, B9, and vitamin D. CRHR1 CNVs affecting specific exons (Exon 1 [210 nucleotides] and Exon 11) were associated with objective cognitive impairment, whereas subjective cognitive complaints were more closely related to depressive symptoms than measurable cognitive deficits. Associations with age and certain viral seropositivities (HSV-1, HSV-2, and Hepatitis A) were also observed with objective cognitive outcomes; however, these findings should be interpreted cautiously given their exploratory nature. This study highlights CRHR1 CNVs as potential modifiers of objectively measured post-COVID-19 cognitive impairment and underscores the importance of distinguishing subjective cognitive complaints from objective cognitive dysfunction, providing a framework for future mechanistic and longitudinal studies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Bioinformatics Approaches to Biomedicine)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

25 pages, 3834 KB  
Article
Analysis of Japanese Twitter Posts Related to COVID-19 Vaccination Focusing on Frequently Occurring Words and Emotional Expressions
by Keisuke Utsu and Osamu Uchida
Information 2026, 17(1), 59; https://doi.org/10.3390/info17010059 - 8 Jan 2026
Viewed by 252
Abstract
The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and its prolonged effects have been widely discussed on social media, and these discussions have been analyzed in various studies. A long-term analysis of Twitter (now “X”) posts regarding COVID-19 vaccination is essential for informing policy and [...] Read more.
The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and its prolonged effects have been widely discussed on social media, and these discussions have been analyzed in various studies. A long-term analysis of Twitter (now “X”) posts regarding COVID-19 vaccination is essential for informing policy and improving public health communication strategies. In addition, to prevent the spread of infectious diseases, it is crucial to rapidly promote vaccination while mitigating the impact of negative sentiment toward vaccination on social media platforms. Therefore, identifying the key factors behind negative discussions is important for guiding policy decisions and shaping responses. In this study, we collected Japanese tweets (posts) containing the words “Corona” and “vaccine” that were posted from February 2021 to December 2022. The results indicate that negative sentiment was primarily driven by concerns about adverse reactions and general fear and anxiety, which were particularly prominent before vaccination for the general public began, as well as mentions of pain during and after vaccination. While concerns about adverse reactions persisted throughout the analysis period, their prominence decreased over time as positive reactions became more frequent. Our findings provide insights into the characteristics and key factors behind negative discussions on COVID-19 vaccination in the Japanese context and may help improve public health communication strategies. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

9 pages, 480 KB  
Article
Minimal Detectable Changes by the 2-Minute Marching Test for Easy Evaluation of Cardiorespiratory Response in Youth Following COVID-19 Infection
by Patchareeya Amput, Weerasak Tapanya, Noppharath Sangkarit and Sirima Wongphon
COVID 2026, 6(1), 16; https://doi.org/10.3390/covid6010016 - 8 Jan 2026
Viewed by 64
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the reliability and minimal detectable change (MDC) of the 2 min marching test (2MMT) for cardiovascular response, as well as to compare its outcomes with those of the 6 min walk test (6MWT), in youth recovering from post-COVID-19 [...] Read more.
This study aims to evaluate the reliability and minimal detectable change (MDC) of the 2 min marching test (2MMT) for cardiovascular response, as well as to compare its outcomes with those of the 6 min walk test (6MWT), in youth recovering from post-COVID-19 condition. Forty-four youth with post-COVID-19 condition underwent two assessment sessions, separated by five days, utilizing both the 6MWT and 2MMT to measure cardiorespiratory response parameters. Test–retest reliability was found to be excellent for the 6MWT (ICC = 0.83; MDC95 = 8.06%) and good for the 2MMT (ICC = 0.78; MDC95 = 15.61%) between initial and follow-up measurements. The 2MMT demonstrates good reliability and validity for assessing cardiovascular response in youth with post-COVID-19 condition. The reported MDC values provide clinically meaningful thresholds that enable clinicians to distinguish true changes in performance from measurement error. These findings support the use of the 2MMT as a practical tool for clinical assessment, providing preliminary guidance for interpreting changes in performance. However, longitudinal monitoring of patient progress was not directly assessed in this study. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section COVID Clinical Manifestations and Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 635 KB  
Review
Predictors of Mortality in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bloodstream Infections: A Scoping Review
by Kartini Abdul Jabar, Nur Izzatul Auni Romli, Kumutha Malar Vellasamy, Vinod Pallath and Anis Rageh Al-Maleki
Pathogens 2026, 15(1), 61; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens15010061 - 7 Jan 2026
Viewed by 120
Abstract
Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infections (PABSIs) are a major clinical challenge due to their association with significant mortality and antimicrobial resistance mechanisms. The COVID-19 pandemic changed antimicrobial practices, intensive care management, and patient risk profiles, potentially influencing the epidemiology and outcomes of PABSIs. In [...] Read more.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infections (PABSIs) are a major clinical challenge due to their association with significant mortality and antimicrobial resistance mechanisms. The COVID-19 pandemic changed antimicrobial practices, intensive care management, and patient risk profiles, potentially influencing the epidemiology and outcomes of PABSIs. In the post-pandemic period, practices were expected to revert to normal. The objective of this scoping review was to identify and summarize reported mortality rates and risk factors for PABSIs in studies published between 2023 and 2025. Literature searches were conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus. Screening was performed in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Twenty-two eligible studies were included. Mortality rates varied across the study setting and populations; however, several consistent predictors were consistently identified, including carbapenem exposure, multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, hematologic disease or malignancy, corticosteroid therapy, sepsis or septic shock, mechanical ventilation, and higher severity-of-illness scores. Few studies have linked molecular mechanisms to patient outcomes, highlighting important gaps in knowledge. Notably, only a small number of studies included the post-pandemic period but did not analyze the data separately. Despite limited available evidence, critically ill and immunocompromised patients remain at greatest risk of death from PABSIs. This review highlights the need for a broader comparative analysis in future. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antimicrobial Resistance in the Post-COVID Era: A Silent Pandemic)
Show Figures

Figure 1

38 pages, 2813 KB  
Article
Long COVID Does Not Impair Hemodynamic, Vascular, or Autonomic Responses to Maximal Exercise: Sex-Stratified Study in Young Adults
by Carla Nascimento dos Santos Rodrigues, Fernanda Rico Angelotto, Vitória Luiz Diotto, Daniel da Motta Cristofoletti, Tatiana Oliveira Passos de Araújo, Marco Antonio de Lima, José Campanholi Neto, Jonato Prestes, James Navalta and Guilherme Borges Pereira
J. Pers. Med. 2026, 16(1), 38; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm16010038 - 7 Jan 2026
Viewed by 206
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Long COVID (LC) has been linked to fatigue, exercise intolerance, and autonomic dysfunction, but sex-stratified data on cardiovascular responses to maximal exercise—an essential component of personalized medicine—are scarce. This study aimed to examine hemodynamic, autonomic, and functional responses during and up [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Long COVID (LC) has been linked to fatigue, exercise intolerance, and autonomic dysfunction, but sex-stratified data on cardiovascular responses to maximal exercise—an essential component of personalized medicine—are scarce. This study aimed to examine hemodynamic, autonomic, and functional responses during and up to 24 h after a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) in young adults with and without Long COVID (LC). Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we assessed 38 physically active adults, who were allocated into four subgroups stratified by clinical condition (LC or control) and biological sex: control–female (CON-F; n = 10), LC–female (LC-F; n = 10), control–male (CON-M; n = 10), and LC–male (LC-M; n = 8). Outcomes included systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate (HR), cardiac output (CO), total (TPR) and peripheral vascular resistance (PVR), pulse wave velocity (PWV), augmentation index (AIx@75), and heart rate variability (HF, LF, LF/HF), assessed at rest, peak effort, recovery (1, 3, 5, 10, 30, and 60 min), and through 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) after CPET. Results: SBP increase appropriately during exercise, with higher peaks in males (p < 0.01), and returned to baseline within 5 min across all groups. HR recovery was preserved; however, LC-F showed lower values than CON-F at 3, 5, and 10 min (126 vs. 144 bpm, p = 0.020; 119 vs. 136 bpm, p = 0.020; 94 vs. 109 bpm, p = 0.011), though all groups normalized by 60 min. PWV, AIx@75, TPR and PVR exhibited expected sex-related patterns without LC-related impairments. HRV indices showed transient post-exercise shifts (HF↓, LF↑, LF/HF↑). Ambulatory monitoring confirmed preserved circadian modulation, with normal systolic dipping (11–13%) and no abnormal nocturnal patterns. Conclusions: Young physically active adults with LC showed preserved hemodynamic, autonomic, and vascular responses during and after maximal exercise. These findings contribute to personalized medicine by showing that individualized, sex-stratified cardiovascular assessments reveal no clinically relevant impairments in this population, supporting tailored clinical decision making and exercise prescription. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 741 KB  
Article
Unmasking COVID-19 Headaches in Healthcare Professionals: Phenotypic Continuity Across Infection, Reinfection, Vaccination and Post-COVID
by Marta Domínguez Gallego, Paula Panos Basterra, Alba Somovilla, Alicia Gonzalez-Martinez, Carmen Ramos, Ana Belen Lopez-Rodriguez, Álvaro Morales Caballero, Amparo López-Guerrero Almansa, Manuela García Cebrián, Jose Vivancos Mora and Ana Beatriz Gago-Veiga
COVID 2026, 6(1), 14; https://doi.org/10.3390/covid6010014 - 6 Jan 2026
Viewed by 110
Abstract
Headache is a common symptom during SARS-CoV-2 infection and may persist beyond three months. Both tension-type and migraine-like headaches have been described during SARS-CoV-2 infection and after immunization. The main objective was to characterize headache phenotype during SARS-CoV-2 infection and its relationship with [...] Read more.
Headache is a common symptom during SARS-CoV-2 infection and may persist beyond three months. Both tension-type and migraine-like headaches have been described during SARS-CoV-2 infection and after immunization. The main objective was to characterize headache phenotype during SARS-CoV-2 infection and its relationship with headache recurrence following reinfection and COVID-19 vaccination in a cohort of healthcare professionals. Secondary aims included profiling primary headaches and identifying predictors of post-COVID-19 headache persistence. We included 109 participants (86.2% women, mean age 45.3 ± 2.5 years). During infection, 49.5% met ICHD-3 criteria for tension-type headache and 12.8% for migraine. Headache recurred in 62.5% after reinfection and 59.2% after vaccination. A primary-headache history was present in 77.9% of sampled patients (25.9% migraine, 47.1% tension-type). The COVID-19 headache phenotype typically mirrored patients’ previous headache type during reinfection and post-vaccination. Persistent headache beyond three months from SARS-CoV-2 infection occurred in 22.9% and was associated with fibromyalgia and obesity. These findings suggest that COVID-19-related headache often mirrors the patient’s pre-existing primary headache and tends to recur with the same phenotype following reinfection or vaccination. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section COVID Clinical Manifestations and Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 2594 KB  
Article
Hospital Readmission, Transitions of Care Bundle, and a Cohort of COVID-19 Patients—An Observational Study
by Jenny Bernard, Jazmin Cascante, Themba Nyirenda, Aimee Gabuya and Victor Carrillo
COVID 2026, 6(1), 13; https://doi.org/10.3390/covid6010013 - 6 Jan 2026
Viewed by 366
Abstract
Vulnerable populations experience higher mortality and readmission after hospital discharge. We sought to evaluate the impact of the Transitions Of Care Bundle (TOCB™) on COVID-19 patient outcomes post-discharge compared to a control cohort. This retrospective study used electronic health record data collected for [...] Read more.
Vulnerable populations experience higher mortality and readmission after hospital discharge. We sought to evaluate the impact of the Transitions Of Care Bundle (TOCB™) on COVID-19 patient outcomes post-discharge compared to a control cohort. This retrospective study used electronic health record data collected for 243 COVID-19 patients (65 TOCB™, 178 control) during the initial pandemic months at a large academic facility in Northeast New Jersey (NJ). Data included demographics, comorbidities, readmissions, mortality, and payor. The TOCB™ cohort had proportionally more Hispanic patients (56.92% vs. 48.3%, p = 0.0885). All TOCB™ patients were discharged home without needing additional services, compared to only 36% of the control group. The implementation of TOCB™ was associated with shorter hospital stays, a potential decrease in readmission rates, and fewer emergency department visits. These results imply that well-coordinated post-discharge services are linked to a diminished risk of mortality, possible hospital readmission, and other adverse health outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section COVID Clinical Manifestations and Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 1338 KB  
Review
Cognition, Cytokines, Blood–Brain Barrier, and Beyond in COVID-19: A Narrative Review
by Ana Barajas, Gemma Riquelme-Alacid, América Vera-Montecinos and Belén Ramos
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27(1), 546; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27010546 - 5 Jan 2026
Viewed by 250
Abstract
Numerous studies report cognitive impairment in COVID-19 patients from the acute to post-acute phases, linked to blood inflammation affecting blood–brain barrier (BBB) permeability and causing leakage of glial and neuronal proteins. However, a clear classification of these cognitive deficits and molecular blood events [...] Read more.
Numerous studies report cognitive impairment in COVID-19 patients from the acute to post-acute phases, linked to blood inflammation affecting blood–brain barrier (BBB) permeability and causing leakage of glial and neuronal proteins. However, a clear classification of these cognitive deficits and molecular blood events over time is still lacking. This narrative review summarizes the neuropsychological consequences of COVID-19 and evidence of altered cytokines and BBB disruption as potential mediators of cognitive impairment across post-infection phases. Post-COVID-19 cognitive dysfunction appears to follow a temporal course, evolving from acute focal deficits in attention, working memory, and executive function to more persistent multidomain impairments. We reviewed key cytokines released into the blood during COVID-19 infection, including antiviral (IFNγ, CXCL1, CXCL10), inflammatory (IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-10, GM-CSF, TNFα), and monocyte chemoattractants (MCP1/CCL2, MCP3/CCL7, MIP-1α/CCL3, GM-CSF, G-CSF). This analysis shows that several inflammatory and viral cytokines remain elevated beyond the acute phase and are associated with cognitive deficits, including IL-6, IL-13, IL-8, IL-1β, TNFα, and MCP1 in long-term post-COVID-19 patients. In addition, we examined studies analyzing changes over time in neurovascular unit proteins as biomarkers of BBB disruption, including extracellular matrix proteins (PPIA, MMP-9), astrocytes (S100β, GFAP), and neurons (NFL). These proteins are elevated in acute COVID-19 but generally return to control levels within six months, suggesting BBB restoration. However, in patients followed for over a year, BBB disruption persists only in those with cognitive impairment and is associated with systemic inflammation, with TGFβ as a related biomarker. Although cognitive sequelae can persist for over 12 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection, further studies are needed to investigate long-term neurocognitive outcomes and their link to sustained proinflammatory cytokine elevation and brain impact. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Neurobiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop