Search Results (21)

Background and Objectives: Transcatheter heart valve (THV) selection is challenging as self-expanding valves (SEVs) are associated with lower post-procedural mean aortic gradients, while balloon-expandable valves (BEVs) have lower rates of paravalvular leak (PVL) and permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI). We aimed to compare the 30-day and 1-year outcomes following Myval BEV (Meril Life Sciences, Vapi, Gujarat, India) and intra-annular Portico SEV (Abbott, St. Paul, MN, USA) implantation. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data from the all-comer TAVI registry of the University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia, from October 2017 to August 2023. Safety and efficacy outcomes following Myval BEV and Portico SEV implantation were compared overall and after propensity score matching. Results: Of the total 1152 THVs implanted, 97 patients (8%) received a Myval BEV and 47 (4%) a Portico SEV. After propensity score matching, there were no significant differences between the two patient cohorts regarding 30-day (Myval 0.0% vs. Portico 2.9%, p = 1.000) and 1-year mortality (Myval 0.0% vs. Portico 5.9%, p = 0.492). Likewise, the rates of new PPI, device failure (mean aortic gradient and more than mild PVL), and periprocedural in-hospital complications were comparable between the two groups. Conclusions: In this retrospective analysis of two intra-annular THVs, the Myval BEV was associated with comparable short- and mid-term outcomes as the Portico SEV. Full article

The main objective of this study was to compare the long-term outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with severe aortic stenosis, focusing on differences between self-expanding valve (SEV) versus balloon-expandable valve (BEV) prostheses and the influence of balloon pre- and post-dilatation on clinical results. The secondary objective was to report the long-term outcomes after TAVI in Romania. All patients who underwent a TAVI procedure for severe AS between November 2016 and May 2025 at a tertiary center in Romania were included in the present study. A total of 702 patients were included, of which 455 (64.8%) and 247 (35.1%) patients received a BEV (Sapien3 platform) and a SEV (Accurate, Boston, Portico, Evolut, or Navitor platforms), respectively. Pre-dilatation was performed in 514 (73.2%) cases, and post-dilatation was performed in 189 (26.9%) cases. There were 10.5 and 7.8 all-cause and cardiovascular-cause mortality event rates per 100 patient years, respectively. In regard to the univariable Cox regression, a BEV has significantly lower mortality than an SEV (HR = 0.67[0.46–0.96], p = 0.03), pre-dilatation did not influence mortality (HR = 0.71[0.48–1.04], p = 0.08), and post-dilatation significantly increased mortality (HR = 1.51[1.05–2.19], p = 0.03). In regard to the multivariable Cox regression, survival was not influenced by pre-dilatation or the valve platform, while post-dilatation had a trend towards higher mortality (p = 0.06). The BEV and SEV have similar survival rates, with no heterogeneity among a large number of TAVI platforms. While pre-dilatation had no impact on mortality, post-dilatation was associated with a trend towards increased mortality (p = 0.06), which was independent of the transprosthetic gradient. Survival after TAVI in Romania is comparable to that reported in Western registries. Full article

Background and Objectives: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation is associated with a higher risk for elevated trans-prosthetic gradients and prosthesis-patient mismatch in patients with a small aortic annulus. We aimed to assess the short-term hemodynamic performance of self-expanding transcatheter aortic valves with an intra-annular leaflet position in patients with small aortic anatomies. Materials and Methods: Consecutive patients with small aortic annuli (annular area < 430 mm²), who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a self-expanding Portico or Navitor (Abbott Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA) transcatheter aortic valve between October 2017 and August 2024 at the University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia, were analyzed. The main endpoints were the post-procedural mean trans-prosthetic gradient, the presence of moderate or severe prosthesis-patient mismatch or paravalvular regurgitation. Results: Overall, 37 patients were included in the study (29 patients with a native aortic valve and 8 patients undergoing valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation). The mean age was 81.6 ± 4.3 years, 32 patients (86.5%) were female. The median annular perimeter was 70.8 mm (interquartile range 67.3–74.1 mm) and the median annular area was 379 mm² (interquartile range 355–412 mm²). The post-procedural mean trans-prosthetic gradient was 9.0 ± 3.5 mmHg, with no cases with a mean gradient > 20 mmHg. Moderate and severe prosthesis-patient mismatch was observed in 21.2% and 3.0% of patients, respectively. Mild paravalvular regurgitation was noted in 44.1% of patients, there were no cases of moderate or severe paravalvular regurgitation. One patient (3.0%) had moderate valvular regurgitation. Conclusions: Self-expanding transcatheter aortic valves with an intra-annular leaflet position are associated with favorable hemodynamic performance in patients with a small aortic annulus. Full article

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as a well-established option for patients with severe aortic stenosis who present high or extreme surgical risk. Direct comparisons of outcomes between different valve prostheses are important to assist operators in making an informed device selection. We aimed to perform a comparative analysis of early clinical outcomes at 30 days and long-term outcomes up to 3 years after TAVR using self-expandable Portico or CoreValve Evolut R valve prostheses. Methods: Out of 396 patients treated with either Portico or CoreValve Evolut R valves from January 2018 to December 2021, 79 patients were assigned to each group after 1:1 propensity score matching based on baseline parameters. Peri- and postprocedural outcomes at 30 days and up to a 3-year follow-up period were retrospectively collected according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC-2) criteria. Results: The immediate survival rate was 100% in both groups. The 30-day mortality was 0.0% in the Portico group and 1.3% in the CoreValve Evolut group (p = 1). Minor postprocedural bleeding was more frequent in the Evolut group both at 30 days (8.9% vs. 0%, p = 0.02) and at 3 years (11.4% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.133). There were no statistically significant differences regarding the combined safety endpoint (p = 1), acute kidney injury (AKIN 2 or AKIN 3) (p = 1; p = 0.477), or new pacemaker implantation (p = 0.31), at either 30 days or 3 years. Postprocedural myocardial infarction and stroke showed comparable rates in both groups. Conclusions: In terms of early clinical outcomes, no statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups of self-expandable valve prostheses, except for a significantly higher rate of minor bleeding in the Evolut group at 30 days. Notably, this trend of increased minor bleeding in the Evolut group persisted over the 3-year follow-up period, although the difference did not reach statistical significance. Both groups demonstrated low rates of all-cause mortality and clinical complications at long-term follow-up. The choice of valve should be customized to the individual characteristics of each patient. Full article

The extensive bibliography on medieval architecture highlights that parish church porticoes are one of the most singular features of the Spanish Romanesque tradition. These structures, which regulated the transition to the Aula Dei, provided villagers with a safe space for conducting liturgical ceremonies and rituals, administering sacraments, and burying the dead. However, parish porticoes soon took on other uses of a secular nature. Thanks to their social role and privileged location, they became ideal spaces for admonishing and instructing the faithful through well-chosen visual repertoires. This article explores these functional and iconographic aspects through the lens of struggle: on the one hand, the earthly confrontation between ecclesiastical authorities and village communities as to the functions of the porticoes, and on the other, the allegorical struggle depicted in their reliefs, whose admonitory motives can be linked to the attributes and meaning of the architectural framework. Full article

An environmentally conscious architectural design of a railway station can have a substantial influence on government spending. Nevertheless, an extensive collection of guidelines for using sustainable design principles in the construction of a railway station can provide several advantages. The goal is to review design visions for railway stations in Thailand, as reflected in student theses and government proposals, from 1983 to 2022 for sustainable design aspects in tropical climates. We perform an analysis of architectural design aspects including service areas, shape, entrances, roofing, style, and development in order to uncover design trends and possible areas that may be enhanced. Station designs are mostly characterized by curved and gable roofs, with 3D curved buildings being the next most common feature. High speed rail (HSR) stations stress local cultural elements in their major entrances while also improving passenger flow. Public buildings frequently employ curved or gabled porticos to achieve a majestic look. Although university theses place a high importance on conceptual design and functionality, it is essential to also consider cost-effectiveness. Key design considerations for future railway stations are transparency, connection, efficient mobility, and cost–time efficiency. The research uncovers deficiencies in user-centered design for thermal comfort and inclusiveness (design-for-all) in Thailand’s tropical environment. Addressing these aspects is critical for future sustainable railway station design evaluations. Full article

Aims: We report 30-day, 1-year, and 3-year outcomes for a new TAVR programme that used five different transcatheter heart valve (THV) systems. Methods: From 2014 to 2020, 122 consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) received TAVR based on the Heart Team decision. Outcomes were analysed for the whole study population and in addition the first 63 patients (Cohort A, 2014 to 2019) were compared to the last 59 patients (Cohort B, 2019 to 2020). Outcomes included VARC-2 definitions and device performance assessed via transthoracic echocardiography by independent high-volume investigators. Results: The mean patient age was 77.9 ± 6.1 years old, and 48 (39.3%) were male. The mean logistic Euroscore II was 4.2 ± 4.5, and the mean STS score was 6.9 ± 4.68. The systems used were as follows: Medtronic Corevalve Evolute R/PRO (82 patients—67.2%); Abbott Portico (13—10.6%); Boston Scientific Lotus (10—8.2%); Meril Myval (11—9%); and Boston Scientific Neo Accurate (6—5%). Access was transfemoral (95.9% of patients); surgical cut down (18% vs. percutaneous 77.8%); subclavian (n = 2); trans-axillary (n = 2); and direct aorta (n = 1). VARC-2 outcomes were as follows: device success rate 97.5%; stroke rate 1.6%; major vascular complication 3.3%; permanent pacemaker implantation 12.4%. At discharge, the incidences of grade I and II aortic regurgitation were 39.95 and 55.5%, respectively. At one year, all-cause mortality was 7.4% without admissions for valve-related dysfunction. The 3-year all-cause mortality and all-stroke rates were 22.9% and 4.1%, respectively. Between the 1-year and 3-year follow-ups, valve-related dysfunction was detected in three patients; one had THV system endocarditis that led to death. There was a remarkable but statistically non-significant decrease in mortality from Cohort A to Cohort B [four (6.3%) vs. one patient (1.7%), p = 0.195] and major vascular complications occurred at a significantly higher rate in the Cohort B [zero (0%) vs. four (6.8% patient, p = 0.036)]. Overall, we found that using multiple devices was safe and allowed for a learning team to achieve a high device success rate from the beginning (97.5%). Conclusions: TAVR with different THV systems showed acceptable early and mid-term outcomes for survival, technical success, and valve-related adverse events in high-risk patients with significant AS, even in the learning curve phase. Full article

Introduction: The self-expanding, resheathable, repositionable transcatheter aortic heart valve Portico is being used successfully for transcatheter aortic valve implantation procedures (TAVI) in patients with severe aortic stenosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes at 2 years after TAVI with the Portico valve. Methods: Multicenter registry of clinical, echocardiographic and survival data from consecutive patients treated with the Portico TAVI system (Abbott, Chicago, IL, USA) in three cath labs in Northern Greece and Epirus during 2017–2020. The primary end point was all-cause mortality at 24 months. Secondary end points included procedural outcomes (efficacy and safety) and echocardiographic measurements. Results: A total of 90 patients (81 ± 6 years, 50% females, mean age 81 ± 6 years) were included in the registry. The indication for implantation was severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis (NYHA III, IV) in eighty-two (91.1%) and degeneration of a prosthetic aortic valve in eight (8.9%) patients. All patients were categorized as high surgical risk (mean Logistic Euroscore 25.9 ± 10, Euroscore II 7.7 ± 4.4 and STS score 10.8 ± 8.9). The procedure was performed transfemorally in all patients, under general anesthesia in 95.6%, under TOE guidance in 21.1%, with native valve predilatation in 46.7%, and the “resheath” option was used in 31.1% of the cases. The implantation was successful in 97.8% and there was a need for a second valve in 2.2% of the cases. Complications included permanent pacemaker implantation (16.7%), access cite complications (15.6%), arrythmias (23.3%), paravalvular leak (moderate 7.8%, severe 1.1%), acute kidney injury (7.8%), no strokes and one death during the procedure. Aortic valve peak velocity, peak and mean pressure gradients, were significantly reduced after the procedure. All-cause mortality at 1, 12 and 24 months was 4.4%, 6.7% and 7.8%, respectively. Conclusions: TAVI with the Portico system comprises an effective and safe solution for the management of severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis in high-risk surgical patients. Full article

Significant progress has been made in both valves and delivery systems (DSs) for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedures. We aimed to present one-year real-life data regarding TAVR procedures using Portico transcatheter heart valves (THVs) with new-generation, low-profile FlexNav DSs. This retrospective, single-center study enrolled 169 consecutive patients (mean age: 75.8 years, 68% females) with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR with Portico THVs and FlexNav DSs between 2020 and 2021. We evaluated safety and efficacy outcomes, following the VARC-3 consensus, periprocedurally and at 30 days and 1 year. Procedural success was observed in 95.9% of cases, and no procedural mortality occurred. At 30 days, the rates of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and neurological events were 4.7%, 3.6%, and 3.0%, respectively. Additionally, major vascular complications, acute kidney injury, and bleeding were recorded at rates of 11.2%, 14.8%, and 7.7%, respectively. The 1-year data showed all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and neurological event rates of 10.7%, 8.3%, and 7.7%, respectively. The moderate paravalvular leak and permanent pacemaker rates at 1 year were 2.6% and 12.2%, respectively. This real-life data provided evidence of positive outcomes and high technical success with Portico THVs and FlexNav DSs. Furthermore, we found low rates of mortality and neurological events, with satisfactory hemodynamic and functional results. Full article

The Castillejo de Monteagudo, which has been well known since excavations began in 1924, is a palatial residence built on a promontory. However, the fact that it was part of an extensive agricultural estate, known as Ḥiṣn al-Faraj, which included dry-farming, orchards, gardens, woodland, hunting areas, and marshes, as well as important hydraulic infrastructures, has not been sufficiently emphasised to date. Archaeological research on the irrigated plain during 2018 and 2019 has brought to light part of the palatine area, which was organised around a large garden presided by a residential complex with a porticoed pavilion and a pool at the centre. All known buildings date to the reign of Emir Ibn Mardanīš (1147–1171), although the possibility that the estate was created earlier cannot be ruled out. It was destroyed twice by the Almohads (1165 and 1171) and reused by the Castilian King Alfonso X, perhaps after being restored by Ibn Hūd al-Mutawakkil (1228–1238). Full article

Background: Third-generation transcatheter heart valves (THVs) are designed to improve outcomes. Data on the new intra-annular self-expanding NAVITOR are scarce. Aims: The aim of this analysis was to compare outcomes between the PORTICO and the NAVITOR systems. Methods: Data from 782 patients with severe native aortic stenosis treated with PORTICO (n = 645) or NAVITOR (n = 137) from 05/2012 to 09/2022 were evaluated. The clinical and hemodynamic outcomes of 276 patients (PORTICO, n = 139; NAVITOR, n = 137) were evaluated according to VARC-3 recommendations. Results: Rates of postprocedural more-than-mild paravalvular leakage (PVL) were significantly lower for NAVITOR than for PORTICO (7.2% vs. 1.5%, p = 0.041). In addition, severe bleeding rates (27.3% vs. 13.1%, p = 0.005) and major vascular complications (5.8% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.036) were lower in the NAVITOR group. The mean gradients (7 vs. 8 mmHg, p = 0.121) and calculated aortic valve areas (1.90 cm² vs. 1.99 cm², p = 0.235) were comparable. Rates of PPI were similarly high in both groups (15.3 vs. 21.6, p = 0.299). Conclusions: The NAVITOR demonstrated favorable in-hospital procedural outcome data, with lower rates of relevant PVL, major vascular complications, and severe bleeding than its predecessor the PORTICO and preserved favorable hemodynamic outcomes. Full article

Palazzo Valentini, the institutional head office of Città Metropolitana di Roma Capitale, stands in in a crucial position in the Roman archaeological and urban contexts, exactly between the Fora valley, Quirinal Hill slopes, and Campus Martius. It stands on a second-century A.D. complex to which belong, between other archeological remains, two richly decorated aristocratic domus. One of these buildings, the domus A, presents an outward porticoed room with a fourth-century AD central impluvium (open air part of the atrium designed to carry away rainwater) with a black/white tiled mosaic pavement, the preservation status of which is compromised by an incoherent degradation product that has caused gradual detachment of the mosaic tiles. To identify the product and determine the causes of degradation, samples of the product were taken and subjected to SEM-EDS, XRF, NMR, FT-IR and GC-MS analyses. The findings reported in this study can help restorers, archaeologists and conservation scientists in order to improve knowledge about the Roman mosaic, its construction phases, conservation problems and proper solutions. Full article

Background: In recent years, trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as an excellent alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Currently, there are several approved devices on the market, yet comparisons among them are scarce. We aimed to compare the various devices via a network meta-analysis. Methods: We performed a network meta-analysis including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and propensity-matched studies that provide comparisons of either a single TAVI with SAVR or two different TAVI devices and report clinical outcomes. Results: We included 12 RCT and 13 propensity-matched studies comprising 42,105 patients, among whom 27,134 underwent TAVI using various valve systems (Sapien & Sapien XT, Sapien 3, Corvalve, Evolut & Evolut Pro, Acurate Neo, Portico). The mean follow-up time was 23.4 months. Sapien 3 was superior over SAVR in the reduction of all-cause mortality (OR = 0.53; 95%CrI 0.31–0.91), while no significant difference existed between other devices and SAVR. Aortic regurgitation was more frequent among TAVI devices compared to SAVR. There was no significant difference between the various THVs and SAVR in cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, NYHA class III-IV, and endocarditis. Conclusions: Newer generation TAVI devices, especially Sapien 3 and Evolut R/Pro are associated with improved outcomes compared to SAVR and other devices of the older generation. Full article

A total of 1001 subjects (82.0 years, 62.5% female, 63.7% NYHA III/IV at baseline) with severe aortic stenosis at high surgical risk were enrolled in the prospective CONFIDENCE registry and treated with a Portico™ transcatheter heart valve (THV) using either a first-generation delivery system (DS) or the FlexNav™ DS. The objective of this registry is to characterize the procedural safety and device performance of the Portico™ THV at 30 days. The study collected ‘standard-of-care’ clinical and device performance data, with adverse events adjudicated by an independent clinical event committee according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria. The implantation of a single Portico™ THV was successful in 97.5% of subjects. The 30-day all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and disabling stroke rates were 2.6%, 2.1%, and 1.8%, respectively. A new pacemaker was implanted in 19.0% of subjects at 30 days. At 30 days, the effective orifice area and mean gradient values were 1.82 cm² and 7.1 mmHg, respectively. The 30-day rate of moderate paravalvular leak (PVL) was 2.1%, with no occurrence of severe PVL. The Portico™ THV demonstrated improved hemodynamic performance and low rates of safety events at 30 days in a large cohort of subjects implanted with the Portico™ THV with either the first-generation DS or FlexNav™ DS. Full article

Background: During the last years, several transcatheter aortic heart valves entered the clinical market and are commercially available. The prostheses differ regarding several technical and functional aspects. However, little is known regarding head-to-head comparative data of the ACURATE neo and the PORTICO valve prostheses. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare two self-expanding transcatheter aortic heart valves (THV), the ACURATE neo and the PORTICO, with regard to in-hospital and 30-day outcomes, as well as early device failures. Methods: A total of 1591 consecutive patients with severe native aortic valve stenosis from two centers were included in the analyses and matched by 1:1 nearest neighbor matching to identify one patient treated with PORTICO (n = 344) for each patient treated with ACURATE neo (n = 344). Results: In-hospital complications were comparable between both valves, including any kind of stroke (ACURATE neo = 3.5% vs. PORTICO = 3.8%; p = 1.0), major vascular complications (ACURATE neo = 4.5% vs. PORTICO = 5.4%; p = 0.99) or life-threatening bleeding (ACURATE neo = 1% vs. PORTICO = 2%; p = 0.68). The rate of device failure defined by the VARC-2 criteria were comparable, including elevated gradients and moderate-to-severe paravalvular leakage (ACURATE neo = 7.3% vs. PORTICO = 7.6%; p = 1.0). However, the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) was significantly more frequent after the use of PORTICO THV (9.5% vs. 18.7%; p = 0.002). Conclusions: In this two-center case-matched comparison, short-term clinical and hemodynamic outcomes showed comparable results between PORTICO and ACURATE neo prostheses. However, PORTICO was associated with a significant higher incidence of PPI. Full article