Search Results (48)

Background: The study aims to compare the short-term clinical outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with the novel self-expandable, intra-annular Navitor valve (NAV) and the balloon-expandable, intra-annular Sapien 3 Ultra valve (S3U). Methods: From a single-center TAVI database, patients receiving NAV and S3U were identified. We applied 1:2 propensity score matching for the selected variables (gender, age, aortic valve perimeter, area, diameter, mean aortic valve gradient, EuroScore2, coronary artery disease (CAD), previous stroke and previous pacemaker implantation), resulting in 153 patients. Results: Clinical outcomes at 30 days of 51 patients with NAV [mean age: 80.4 ± 6.7 years; 51% female; mean annulus diameter: 24.1 ± 1.40 mm; EuroScore2: 3.4 ± 3.1%] and 102 patients with S3U [mean age: 79.9 ± 6.5 years (p = 0.7); 51% female (p > 0.99); mean annulus diameter: 24.1 ± 1.4 mm (p > 0.99); EuroScore2: 3.2 ± 2.7 (p = 0.7)] were analyzed according to VARC-3 recommendations. Post-TAVI aortic valve mean (S3U: 11.0 [3–27] mmHg; NAV: 7 [3–15] mmHg; p < 0.001) and maximum (S3U: 22 [6–44] mmHg; NAV: 12 [5–28] mmHg; p < 0.001) gradients at discharge were significantly lower with NAV, whereas the effective orifice area (EOA) of the aortic valve measured significantly larger with NAV (S3U: 1.5 [0.8–3.8] cm²; NAV: 2.1 [0.9–3.5] cm²; p < 0.001). Rates of no to mild paravalvular regurgitation (PVL) were 92.1% after NAV and 91.2% after S3U implantation (p = 0.15), mild to moderate PVL were 2.0% after NAV vs. 2.9% after S3U (p = 0.1) and moderate PVL were 2% after NAV and 1% after S3U (p = 0.07). None of the patients had a severe regurgitation. Severe patient–prosthesis mismatch (PPM) occurred significantly less with NAV (S3U: 14.7%; NAV: 7.8%; p = 0.002). One (1%) non-disabling stroke occurred within the S3U group and none occurred within the NAV group (p = 0.1). Life-threatening (S3U: 2.9%; NAV= 1%; p > 0.99) and major (S3U: n = 2.9; NAV: 0%; p = 0.55) bleeding events were comparable between both groups. The incidence of major (S3U: 2.9%; NAV: 2.0%; p > 0.99) vascular complications and the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (S3U: 9.8%; NAV: 11.8%; p = 0.8) were comparable in both groups. The 30-day mortality rate was 0.7% [1 in NAV group (2%), none in S3U; p = 0.3]. Conclusions: In conclusion, at 30-day follow-up, the self-expanding intra-annular Navitor valve demonstrated excellent acute safety and superior early hemodynamic performance, characterized by significantly lower transvalvular gradients and lower rates of severe PPM compared to the balloon-expandable Sapien 3 Ultra. However, whether these acute hemodynamic advantages translate into superior long-term clinical outcomes remains to be determined in long-term follow-up studies. Full article

Background/Objectives: Nowadays, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is widespread in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis. New prosthesis designs are becoming available to address the shortcomings of their predecessors and improve clinical outcomes. Methods: Electronic databases were screened for studies comparing outcomes of TAVI with Portico and SAPIEN 3. In a random-effects meta-analysis the pooled incidence rates of procedural, clinical and functional outcomes, according to VARC-2 definitions, were assessed. Results: Thirteen observational studies and one multi-center randomized clinical trial enrolling 20,522 patients (Portico N = 3001 and SAPIEN 3 N = 17,521) were included in the analysis. The need for more than one prosthesis during initial implantation was significantly higher among Portico recipients compared to SAPIEN 3 recipients: (RR 2.72 [1.36, 5.45] p = 0.005). Pre- and post-dilatation were performed more frequently in the Portico group (RR 1.53 [1.12, 2.09], p = 0.008 and RR 4.21 [2.83, 6.26], p < 0.00001, respectively). Moderate-to-severe paravalvular leak (PVL) was significantly more common in the Portico arm (RR 3.27 [1.80, 5.91] p < 0.0001). In contrast, the mean gradient and rate of prosthesis–patient mismatch (PPM) was significantly lower in the Portico group (MD −31.58 [−37.02; −26.14] mmHg and RR 0.42 [0.32, 0.55], p < 0.00001). Recipients of Portico demonstrated over 60% higher risk of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) compared to SAPIEN 3 (RR 1.62 [1.25, 2.10], p = 0.0002). Other procedural and short-term clinical outcomes, including neurologic events, major vascular complications, life threatening or major bleeding, acute kidney injury, myocardial infarction and mortality did not differ between the devices. A difference in mortality was observed at the 1-year follow-up (RR 1.26 [1.06, 1.51], p = 0.01; I² = 5%). Conclusions: The evidence shows good short-term outcomes for both valves. Compared to SAPIEN 3, Portico was associated with a significantly higher rate of moderate-to-severe PVL and PPI, but a lower mean gradient and incidence of PPM. A significantly higher 1-year mortality was observed in the Portico group. Full article

Background and Objectives: Recent studies have focused on evaluating the hemodynamic results in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with small aortic annuli. There is limited data on the incidence, clinical characteristics, and mortality of prosthesis–patient mismatch (PPM) in patients undergoing TAVI with large aortic annuli. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis and large annuli who underwent TAVI at a single UK center. PPM was defined according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC-3) criteria and identified using echocardiography within 4–6 weeks following TAVI. Measurements were analyzed by an experienced operator who was blinded to the type of valve platform and clinical outcomes. Results: A total of 447 patients were screened, of whom 353 patients were included in the analysis. The incidence of any PPM or severe PPM was 38% and 15% of patients, respectively. Patients with severe PPM were younger, had larger body surface area, and were more likely to receive a balloon-expandable valve (BEV). At a mean follow-up of 35 months, mortality was numerically higher in patients with severe PPM (46% vs. 36%, p = 0.20) but this did not reach statistical significance. Similar mortality rates were observed among patients with or without severe PPM in those who received SEV as well as BEV. There was a differential role of body surface area in mortality in patients who developed severe PPM versus non-severe PPM. Conclusions: Severe PPM was evident in patients with large aortic annuli undergoing TAVI, particularly those who received BEV. Nonetheless, severe PPM did not impact mortality rate at three-year follow-up. Longer-term follow-up may be required to assess the impact of severe PPM on mortality. Full article

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has transformed the management of severe aortic stenosis and is now widely used across a broad spectrum of surgical risk. With expanding indications and increasing use in younger patients, contemporary practice increasingly emphasizes lifetime management of aortic valve disease, a shift further supported by recent developments including findings from the EARLY TAVR trial and the May 2025 U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval of TAVR for asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis. This narrative review summarizes recent developments in TAVR, including advances in device technology, procedural techniques, and patient selection. Focus is placed on the importance of optimal first valve selection, prevention of prosthesis–patient mismatch (PPM), and planning for future reintervention such as valve-in-valve (ViV) TAVR. Emerging procedural strategies including bioprosthetic valve fracture and leaflet modification techniques have expanded treatment options for patients at risk of elevated gradients or coronary obstruction. The review also highlights evolving approaches to TAVR in complex clinical scenarios and discusses future directions in device design and imaging-based procedural planning. As TAVR continues to evolve, careful procedural planning and multidisciplinary heart team collaboration remain essential to optimizing long-term outcomes. Full article

Bone resorption secondary to stress shielding is a leading cause of hip implant failure, primarily due to the stiffness mismatch between the femur and the prosthesis. Although anatomical stem designs generally provide improved load transfer, Dorr type C femurs often require straight stems to ensure adequate primary stability. This work presents a systematic approach to designing a straight, additively manufactured porous titanium hip stem aimed at minimizing stress shielding. The lattice architecture is customized to replicate the mechanical properties of bone based on patient-specific femoral CT scans. The performance of the resulting porous implant is numerically assessed under simplified physiological gait loading conditions. The implant behavior is evaluated through a homogenization strategy to model the lattice structure, significantly reducing the computational effort and making the methodology easily replicable. Compared to its full counterpart, the porous design achieves a significant reduction in predicted bone loss, suggesting that the proposed framework is a promising proof of concept for patient-specific implants. While further experimental validation and larger cohort studies are required, these findings highlight the potential of mechanically tunable porous structures to mitigate the stress shielding phenomenon in anatomical conditions such as Dorr type C femurs, which require straight stems. Full article

Aortic valve disease is increasingly recognized as a chronic, progressive condition in which the initial valve intervention exerts a decisive influence on all subsequent therapeutic options. The persistence of prosthesis–patient mismatch (PPM), often driven by implantation of small surgical prostheses (≤21–23 mm), is associated with higher residual transvalvular gradients, attenuated left ventricular reverse remodeling, inferior long-term survival, and compromised outcomes following valve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter procedures. Accumulating clinical and imaging evidence indicates that aortic annular enlargement (AAE), particularly using contemporary Y-incision and extended “roof” reconstruction techniques, can safely and reproducibly expand the annulus, sinuses of Valsalva, and sinotubular junction, thereby permitting implantation of larger prostheses and substantially reducing the risk of PPM. Insights from computational fluid dynamics further demonstrate that annular and root enlargement favorably alters postoperative flow dynamics, resulting in lower peak velocities, reduced pressure gradients, and more physiologic flow patterns in both primary surgical valve replacement and simulated ViV settings. From a lifetime management perspective, valve diameter optimization emerges as a critical determinant of both immediate hemodynamic performance and future procedural feasibility. Surgical programs that adopt a systematic approach to anatomic assessment, valve sizing strategy, PPM surveillance, and ViV preparedness may achieve meaningful improvements in short- and long-term outcomes. This review integrates anatomic, operative, hemodynamic, and quality-oriented evidence to support consideration of valve upsizing as a central principle in contemporary aortic valve replacement. Full article

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has revolutionized the treatment of severe aortic stenosis, evolving from a therapy reserved for inoperable patients to a first-line option across all surgical risk categories. As TAVR expands to younger patients with longer life expectancies, lifetime management strategies become paramount. This comprehensive review examines the important role of computed tomography (CT) planning in optimizing initial valve selection and predicting future reintervention feasibility. We discuss the decision framework between TAVR and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) as initial therapy, strategies to optimize the index TAVR procedure, including minimizing patient-prosthesis mismatch, reducing paravalvular regurgitation, preventing conduction abnormalities and coronary obstruction, and facilitating future reinterventions. For patients requiring redo procedures, we analyse TAVR-in-TAVR considerations, including risk plane assessment, coronary access preservation, and leaflet modification techniques. Future directions include advances in valve design, artificial intelligence integration in procedural planning, and development of personalized risk assessment tools. Successful lifetime management requires multidisciplinary collaboration and individualized treatment planning to optimize outcomes throughout a patient’s lifetime journey with aortic valve disease. Full article

(1) Background: Prosthesis–patient mismatch (PPM) after aortic valve replacement (AVR) impairs left ventricular (LV) recovery and is more common in women due to smaller aortic dimensions. Although the Perceval sutureless valve provides larger effective orifice areas, sex-specific PPM outcomes remain unclear. This study evaluated sex-related differences in PPM incidence, severity, and early impact after Perceval AVR. (2) Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 139 patients (68 males, 71 females) who underwent Perceval AVR between 2016 and 2020. PPM was defined per Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 (VARC-3) criteria using indexed effective orifice area (EOAi) and stratified by body-mass-index (BMI) (<30 vs. ≥30 kg/m²). Echocardiography assessed hemodynamic performance. (3) Results: PPM was markedly more frequent in women than men (74.6% vs. 22.1%, p < 0.001). Among non-obese patients, 47.9% of females versus 16.2% of males developed PPM (p < 0.001). Women received smaller valves and consistently exhibited lower EOAi despite similar gradients. Postoperatively, females had reduced EOAi (0.8 vs. 0.9 cm²/m², p < 0.001) but higher LV ejection fraction (55.8% vs. 49.5%, p = 0.004). Early clinical outcomes were comparable between sexes. (4) Conclusions: Despite favorable hemodynamics of sutureless AVR, anatomical sex differences result in persistently higher PPM rates in women, predominantly of moderate severity. Tailored strategies—including aortic root enlargement and sex-specific EOAi thresholds—may improve prosthesis selection and outcomes in female patients. Full article

Since the initial use of transcatheter pulmonary valves (TPVs), various generations of balloon-expandable and self-expanding valves have become available to effectively treat dysfunctional right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT), providing a less invasive alternative to surgery. In this review, we summarize the most up-to-date TPVR outcomes and mechanisms of TPV dysfunction. Full article

Background: Prosthesis patient mismatch (PPM) is associated with poor outcomes in literature. Prevention of mismatch is crucial in aortic valve replacement, yet there is no current consensus on preventative strategies. Objectives: This study introduces a novel clinical framework, nomenclature, and algorithm for contemporary Heart Team practice, providing a systematic approach for a tailored surgical strategy to anticipate and prevent mismatch. Methods: This was a single-center observational study performing a descriptive analysis of an evolving practice on 100 consecutive patients operated for aortic valve stenosis between 2020 and 2024. A step-by-step No-Mismatch algorithm was designed for the Heart Team to triage, discuss, and decide the surgical strategy prior to the procedure, identifying patients at risk of mismatch, and guiding the surgeon’s plan to prevent PPM and consider a Lifetime Valve Strategy. Results: The algorithm identified 26% of patients at risk of mismatch requiring a No-Mismatch strategy, and 20% at risk of small valve implantation requiring a Lifetime Valve Strategy. This cohort included 51 urgent cases. Valve pathology included 35% congenital, 59% degenerative, 1% rheumatic, and 5% redo operations. Valve implant type: 82% biological, including 29% rapid deployment valve (RDV), and 18% mechanical; 20% of patients required aortic root enlargements (AREs). Pre-, intra-, and post-operative data are presented. Mortality occurred at 1%. All degrees of mismatch were prevented. Conclusions: The surgeon was able to predict mismatch and elected either ARE, RDV, or a mechanical valve as required. Patient selection and a No-Mismatch Heart Team approach are essential to provide a tailored strategy for aortic valve interventions. Full article

Objective: Prosthesis–patient mismatch (PPM) occurs after aortic valve replacement (AVR) when the effective orifice area of the implanted prosthetic valve is small relative to the patient’s body surface area. Beyond simply elevating transvalvular gradient, PPM profoundly affects cardiac remodeling, coronary physiology, and ultimately patient survival. This comprehensive review synthesizes current evidence regarding PPM pathophysiology, clinical consequences, and therapeutic strategies. Methods: We conducted a narrative review of PPM in surgical (SAVR) and transcatheter (TAVR) aortic valve replacement. PubMed and Embase were systematically searched using terms related to AVR and PPM and reference lists of key studies and reviews were screened. Studies addressing PPM prevalence, hemodynamic impact, clinical outcomes, and mitigation strategies were included. Results: PPM, defined as an iEOA ≤ 0.85 cm²/m² (moderate) or ≤0.65 cm²/m² (severe), demonstrates variable prevalence across studies, typically ranging from 5 to 30% after SAVR and 2–35% after TAVR. It is associated with increased transvalvular gradients, reduced left ventricular mass regression, persistent coronary flow abnormalities, higher rates of heart failure, and both early and late mortality. Supra-annular self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) devices and newer generation stentless or bovine pericardial surgical valves exhibit lower PPM rates than older stented or porcine valves. Valve-in-valve (ViV) TAVR and bioprosthetic valve fracture (BVF) can improve outcomes in failed surgical valves but are less effective in small annuli. TAVR-in-TAVR procedures are limited by anatomic and technical constraints, especially in maintaining coronary access and minimizing residual gradients. Conclusions: PPM remains a common and clinically consequential complication of AVR that compromises long-term outcomes. It is largely preventable through accurate preoperative imaging, valve sizing, and consideration of annular enlargement. Optimal outcomes require matching valve characteristics to individual patient anatomy and physiology. In an era of expanding TAVR use, preventing PPM during the index procedure is critical to optimizing survival and preserving future reintervention options. Full article

Background/Objectives: To report our single-centre experience with the first 100 patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with the new balloon-expandable Myval system. We report 3-year outcomes in low- to high-risk TAVR patient populations. Methods: From November 2019 to July 2021, 100 consecutive patients underwent TAVR, and their outcomes were classified according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 definitions. Device performance was assessed using transthoracic echocardiography. Data collection was approved by the local ethical committee. Results: Among the 100 patients, most were male (n = 63), the mean age was 74.7 years, the mean EuroSCORE II score was 4.8 ± 4.9, and the mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 5.6 ± 3.9. All patients were followed up for three years or until death. The rates of all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality and stroke were 28%, 7% and 5%, respectively. After three years, residual moderate aortic regurgitation was detected in eight patients without severe grade, and bioprosthetic valve dysfunction was observed in 17: structural valve deterioration in 10 (only stage 2), non-structural valve deterioration in three (paravalvular leak in one, patient–prosthesis mismatch in two), and endocarditis in four. Definite transcatheter heart valve thrombosis (hypoattenuated leaflet thickening) was not observed. Bioprosthetic valve failure was detected in four patients (stage 1: 1, stage 2: 0, stage 3: 3). After three years of follow-up, survival analysis revealed no significant differences in all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, or the composite endpoint (including cardiac mortality, stroke and valve-related dysfunction) between patients with bicuspid (BAV) and tricuspid (TAV) aortic valve morphology and across annulus sizes (small, intermediate and large). Conclusions: TAVR resulted in significant and sustained improvements in valve haemodynamics with low rates of valve dysfunction and adverse clinical outcomes over a three-year follow-up period. Valve morphology (BAV vs. TAV) and annulus size did not significantly impact survival, haemodynamic performance, or valve durability. These results support the expanded use of TAVR in diverse patient populations, although extended follow-up is essential to fully establish long-term durability. Full article

Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is still the gold-standard treatment for aortic stenosis. However, the increasing use of biological prostheses, even in young patients, makes Valve-in-Valve (ViV) transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) an attractive option compared to redo SAVR, thanks to its lower invasiveness and sometimes greater safety. However, there are several technical and anatomical aspects to consider. Therefore, the aim of our review is to examine the main mechanisms responsible for the degeneration of biological prostheses and, subsequently, to analyze the hemodynamic (transvalvular gradients, patient–prosthesis mismatch, paravalvular leakage) and technical (risk of coronary obstruction, prosthetic implantation strategy) aspects that most influence the procedure’s success and long-term outcomes. To this end, we present a case we treated in order to enhance our readers’ experience with this procedure. Currently, ViV TAVI is approved for patients at high surgical risk, but it could become a valid option compared to redo SAVR; however, more clinical trials are needed to better analyze the survival differences between these two procedures. Furthermore, it remains a therapeutic strategy reserved for highly specialized centers due to the technical difficulties involved in its execution. Full article

Introduction: Prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) in surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is known to be a poor prognostic factor. However, the parameters for preventing postoperative PPM in SAVR have not been established. Materials and Methods: Two hundred and five patients (mean age 72.5 ± 7.4 years, 129 males) who underwent SAVR were analyzed. Preoperatively, we determined the recommended prosthesis valve size from the mean aortic valve (AV) diameter derived from the AV annulus area by preoperative three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (3D-TEE). We investigated the association between pre- and postoperative changes in annulus diameter and the occurrence of PPM. Results: PPM was present in 6 patients (2.9%). Pre- and postoperative AV annulus diameter change ratio was greater in the group with PPM than in that without PPM (10.4 ± 3.6% vs. 3.0 ± 5.6%, p = 0.002). The use of prosthetic valve rings smaller than the recommended size was higher in the group with PPM than in that without PPM. (83.3% vs. 20.6%, p = 0.002). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, use of a valve smaller than the recommended size was an independent predictor of PPM (odds ratio 19.3, 95% confidence interval 2.14–174.5, p = 0.008). Conclusions: The recommended prosthetic AV size based on preoperative 3D-TEE is useful for determining the optimal prosthetic AV size to prevent PPM after SAVR. Full article

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) was first introduced as a minimally invasive treatment for patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) who are at high or intermediate surgical risk. Recently, its application has expanded to include younger and lower-risk patients, establishing TAVR as a less invasive alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) across the entire surgical spectrum. The expanding utilization of TAVR has driven significant advancements that have greatly enhanced its safety and effectiveness, resulting in a substantial reduction in complications such as paravalvular leak, conduction abnormalities, and periprocedural strokes. Numerous trials have demonstrated the potential superiority of TAVR over conventional surgery in achieving favorable clinical outcomes. Furthermore, the increasing number of long-term trials has provided valuable insight into TAVR outcomes in previously under-studied populations, including patients with complex anatomies. However, significant challenges remain, particularly in ensuring the long-term durability of transcatheter valves, with younger patients likely to outlive their bioprosthetic valves. Consequently, the focus is shifting towards lifetime management strategies, including considerations for coronary re-access, the risk of coronary obstruction, and prosthesis–patient mismatch. This review explores key developments in the field, including TAVR for aortic regurgitation and bicuspid anatomy, the emerging role of TAVR in moderate and asymptomatic AS, and innovations in valve design and procedural planning. We also examine novel imaging tools, adjunctive technologies, and strategies to address coronary access and re-intervention. As long-term data accumulate, these evolving trends will shape the future of TAVR and its role in managing aortic valve disease across increasingly complex clinical scenarios. Full article