Search Results (623)

Background: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a prevalent degenerative joint disease that can greatly affect quality of life in middle-aged and elderly individuals. Nutritional supplements are increasingly used for KOA due to their low risk, but direct comparative evidence on their efficacy and safety remains scarce. This study aimed to systematically compare the effectiveness and safety of seven common nutritional supplements for KOA. Methods: A systematic review and network meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library were searched through December 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating use of eggshell membrane, vitamin D, Boswellia, curcumin, ginger, krill oil, or collagen, versus placebo, in adults with KOA. Primary outcomes included changes in scores for WOMAC pain, stiffness and function, and pain visual analog scale (VAS). Adverse events were also assessed. Bayesian network meta-analyses estimated ranking probabilities for each intervention. Results: In total, 39 RCTs (42 studies; 4599 patients) were included. Compared with placebo, Boswellia showed significant improvements in WOMAC pain (mean difference [MD] = 10.58, 95% CI: 6.45 to 14.78, p < 0.05), stiffness (MD = 9.47, 95% CI: 6.39 254 to 12.74, p < 0.05), function (MD = 14.00, 95% CI: 7.74 to 20.21, p < 0.05), and VAS pain (MD = 17.26, 95% CI: 8.06 to 26.52, p < 0.05). Curcumin, collagen, ginger, and krill oil also demonstrated benefits in some outcomes. No supplement was associated with increased adverse events compared to placebo. Bayesian rankings indicated Boswellia had the highest probability of being most effective for pain and stiffness, with krill oil and curcumin showing potential for function improvement. Conclusions: Nutritional supplements, particularly Boswellia, appear to be effective and well-tolerated for improving KOA symptoms and function. These results suggest that certain supplements may be useful as part of non-pharmacological KOA management. However, further large-scale, well-designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed to confirm these findings, particularly those that include more standardized dosages and formulations, as well as to evaluate their long-term efficacy. Full article

Artificial intelligence (AI) techniques have propelled biomedical sensors beyond measuring physiological markers to interpreting subjective states like stress, pain, or emotions. Despite these technological advances, user trust is not guaranteed and is inadequately addressed in extant research. This review proposes the Cognition–Context–Contrast (CCC) conceptual framework to explain the trust and acceptance of AI-enabled sensors. First, we map cognition, comprising the expectations and stereotypes that humans have about machines. Second, we integrate task context by situating sensor applications along an intellective-to-judgmental continuum and showing how demonstrability predicts tolerance for sensor uncertainty and/or errors. Third, we analyze contrast effects that arise when automated sensing displaces familiar human routines, heightening scrutiny and accelerating rejection if roll-out is abrupt. We then derive practical implications such as enhancing interpretability, tailoring data presentations to task demonstrability, and implementing transitional introduction phases. The framework offers researchers, engineers, and clinicians a structured conceptual framework for designing and implementing the next generation of AI biosensors. Full article

Background and Objectives: Functional capacity assessment is essential in bariatric surgery candidates, but the Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) may be limited by fatigue, joint pain, and spatial constraints in individuals with severe obesity. Shorter tests such as the Two-Minute Walk Test (2MWT), Three-Minute Walk Test (3MWT), and One-Minute Sit-to-Stand Test (1MSTS) have been proposed as alternatives, yet comparative data in this population remain scarce. We aimed to evaluate the validity, reliability, and clinical utility of the 2MWT, 3MWT, and 1MSTS as substitutes for the 6MWT in patients preparing for bariatric surgery. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 142 obese adults (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m²) underwent standardized 2MWT, 3MWT, 6MWT, and 1MSTS protocols. Correlation, linear regression, test–retest reliability (ICC), and ROC analyses were used to determine each test’s correlation and discriminative accuracy for impaired exercise tolerance (6MWT < 450 m). Results: The 3MWT showed the strongest correlation with the 6MWT (r = 0.930) and the highest explained variance (R² = 0.865), especially in individuals with BMI > 50. It also exhibited excellent reliability (ICC > 0.9) and a strong ROC profile (AUC = 0.931; 212 m cut-off). The 2MWT demonstrated acceptable concurrent validity but slightly lower agreement. The 1MSTS showed weak and inconsistent associations with 6MWT performance, suggesting limited value in assessing aerobic capacity in this population. Conclusions: The 3MWT appears to be a valid, reliable, and clinically practical alternative to the 6MWT in individuals with severe obesity. The 2MWT may be used when time or patient tolerance is limited. The 1MSTS, while safe and simple, may reflect strength and coordination more than aerobic capacity, limiting its utility in this context. Full article

Background/objectives: This was a post hoc analysis of safety data across the bivalent respiratory syncytial virus prefusion F (RSVpreF) vaccine clinical trial development program. Methods: Data from eight clinical trials in 46,913 immunocompetent adults who received RSVpreF or placebo were analyzed. Local reactions and systemic events were assessed among non-pregnant ≥18-year-olds (n = 9517); adverse events (AEs) among pregnant and non-pregnant 18–59-year-olds (n = 9238); and vaccine-related AEs among non-pregnant ≥18-year-olds (n = 39,314). Post-marketing data in non-pregnant adults were considered. Results: Local reactions and systemic events were reported more frequently in RSVpreF versus placebo recipients; injection site pain was the most common local reaction (RSVpreF, 18.9%; placebo, 7.4%), and fatigue (23.5%; 18.4%) and headache (19.5%; 15.0%) were the most common systemic events. Percentages of AEs within 1 month after vaccination were similar across groups (RSVpreF, 12.8%; placebo, 13.1%); severe AEs were reported in ≤1.5% of participants. Differences in percentages of individuals reporting vaccine-related AEs between the RSVpreF and placebo groups were <0.2% for all related AEs. Serious AEs throughout the study were reported in ≤14.0% (RSVpreF, 12.6%; placebo, 14.0%). No atrial fibrillation, Guillain-Barré syndrome, or acute polyneuropathy cases were reported. The AE data from post-marketing data sources were consistent with the safety profile from the clinical trial program, with no new safety concerns. Conclusions: Integrated data demonstrated that RSVpreF was well tolerated with a favorable safety profile in non-pregnant and pregnant adults. Ongoing surveillance through real-world use and clinical trial experience continue to support the safety profile of RSVpreF. ClinicalTrials.gov: CT03529773/NCT04071158/NCT04785612/NCT05035212/NCT05096208/NCT05842967/NCT04032093/NCT04424316. Full article

Background/Objectives: Iron deficiency without anaemia (IDNA) is common in non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (CKD) and contributes to fatigue, reduced exercise tolerance, and impaired quality of life (QoL). While intravenous (IV) iron replacement is known to benefit anaemic patients, its role in IDNA remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of ferric derisomaltose (FDI) on patient-reported QoL outcomes in CKD patients with IDNA. Methods: This was a post hoc analysis of the double-blind, multicentre Iron and the Heart randomised controlled trial. Fifty-four participants with IDNA (ferritin < 100 µg/L or transferrin saturation < 20% and haemoglobin 110–150 g/L) and CKD stages G3b–G5 were randomised 1:1 to receive either 1000 mg FDI (n = 26) or placebo (n = 28). An additional 10 iron-replete CKD patients served as controls. SF-36v2 QoL surveys were collected at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months. Results: SF-36v2 scores declined across all domains, but deterioration was consistently milder in the FDI group. Role physical declined by 3% in the FDI group versus 12% with placebo and 4% in controls. Bodily pain improved by 2.8% with FDI but worsened by 1.5% in the placebo group. Mental health improved by 3.4 points with FDI and declined by 2.7 points in the placebo group, creating a 6.1-point separation. While differences did not reach statistical significance, likely due to small sample size, the consistent trends favour FDI. Conclusions: IV iron may attenuate QoL decline in non-dialysis-dependent CKD patients with IDNA. These findings support the need for larger, adequately powered trials to assess patient-centred outcomes in this population. Full article

Disruption of circadian rhythms by abnormal light exposure and reduced melatonin secretion has been linked to heightened pain sensitivity and opioid tolerance. This study evaluated how environmental light manipulation and exogenous melatonin supplementation influence pain perception and morphine tolerance in a rat model of neuropathic pain induced by partial sciatic nerve transection (PSNT). Rats were exposed to constant darkness, constant light, or a 12 h/12 h light–dark cycle for one week before PSNT surgery. Behavioral assays and continuous intrathecal (i.t.) infusion of morphine, melatonin, or their combination were conducted over a 7-day period beginning immediately after PSNT. On Day 7, after discontinued drugs infusion, an acute intrathecal morphine challenge (15 µg, i.t.) was administered to assess tolerance expression. Constant light suppressed melatonin levels, exacerbated pain behaviors, and accelerated morphine tolerance. In contrast, circadian-aligned lighting preserved melatonin rhythms and mitigated these effects. Melatonin co-infusion attenuated morphine tolerance and enhanced morphine analgesia. Reduced pro-inflammatory cytokine expression and increase anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 level and suppressed astrocyte activation were also observed by melatonin co-infusion during morphine tolerance induction. These findings highlight the potential of melatonin and circadian regulation in improving opioid efficacy and reduced morphine tolerance in managing neuropathic pain. Full article

Background: Emerging evidence indicates that some individuals recovering from COVID-19 develop persistent symptoms, including fatigue, pain, cognitive difficulties, and psychological distress, commonly known as Long COVID. These symptoms often overlap with those seen in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME), underscoring the need for integrative, non-pharmacological interventions. This Phase II controlled trial aimed to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRV-BF) in individuals with Long COVID who meet the diagnostic criteria for CFS/ME. Specific objectives included assessing feasibility indicators (drop-out rates, side effects, participant satisfaction) and changes in fatigue, depression, anxiety, pain, and health-related quality of life. Methods: Participants were assigned alternately and consecutively to the HRV-BF intervention or Treatment-as-usual (TAU), in a predefined 1:1 sequence (quasirandom assignment). The intervention consisted of 10 HRV-BF sessions, held twice weekly over 5 weeks, with each session including a 10 min respiratory preparation and 40 min of active training. Results: The overall drop-out rate was low (5.56%), and participants reported a generally high level of satisfaction. Regarding side effects, the mean total Simulator Sickness Questionnaire score was 24.31 (SD = 35.42), decreasing to 12.82 (SD = 15.24) after excluding an outlier. A significantly greater improvement in severe fatigue was observed in the experimental group (H = 4.083, p = 0.043). When considering all outcomes collectively, a tendency toward improvement was detected in the experimental group (binomial test, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: HRV-BF appears feasible and well tolerated. Findings support the need for Phase III trials to confirm its potential in mitigating fatigue in Long COVID. Full article

Objective: To compare the effect of different bone augmentation procedures, namely, autogenous bone blocks (ABBs) versus guided bone regeneration (GBR), on patient-reported outcomes (PROMs). Methods: This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. A MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science search was conducted by two independent reviewers in combination with a free-hand search in relevant journals until June 2025. Outcomes were PROMs to enhance our understanding of the evolution of these procedures. Results: The electronic search yielded 6291 articles. After title screening, 67 articles were further analyzed for abstract review, which resulted in 14 articles eligible for full-text reading. Six articles were finally included based on the exclusion and inclusion criteria with a total of 295 patients. The overall study quality was low, since only two RCTs could be included. One study demonstrated a high risk of bias. Different PROMs were examined and compared such as pain, edema, neurosensory disturbance, Patient-Reported Predominant Symptom, OHIP-14, postoperative analgesic usage, willingness to repeat, and likelihood to recommend. Meta-analysis was not achievable due to a lack of direct comparisons and heterogeneity in terms of PROMs. Evaluation points varied between pretreatment and up to nearly 10-years of follow-up. Conclusions: Despite significant heterogeneity and reporting, this systematic review concluded that ABB and GBR are well-tolerated procedures. Trends such as transient postoperative pain and swelling with a minor occurring of neurosensory disturbances were reported in a few studies. Overall, a good perception of postoperative recovery was reported for both treatment modalities. Good quality of life was noted related to GBR procedures. Patient-reported outcomes were only analyzed for patients who completed the entire follow-up period. This may introduce bias, as patients who dropped out and were more likely to experience complications were not represented, potentially resulting in a more favorable portrayal of the outcomes. Further well-conducted prospective studies with a long follow-up are needed for an evidence-based evaluation and comparison of PROMs for these procedures. Full article

Post-craniotomy pain is common yet often sub-optimally managed because systemic opioids can obscure postoperative neurologic examinations. The superficial cervical plexus block (SCPB) has, therefore, emerged as a targeted regional anesthesia option for occipital craniotomies. The SCPB targets the C2–C4 nerves to anesthetize the occipital scalp region, covering the lesser occipital nerve territory that lies within typical posterior scalp incisions. Clinical evidence shows the block is effective in reducing acute postoperative pain after occipital craniotomy and diminishes opioid requirements. Studies have demonstrated successful and long-lasting analgesia, reductions in 24-h opioid consumption, and a lower incidence of severe pain. Moreover, the technique exhibits a low complication rate and is safer than a deep cervical plexus block because the injection remains superficial and avoids critical vascular and neural structures. When delivered under ultrasound guidance, major adverse events are exceedingly rare. By reducing opioid use, the SCPB can help reduce postoperative complications, allowing earlier neurological assessments and fewer opioid-related side effects. Incorporation of the SCPB into multimodal analgesia regimens can, therefore, accelerate postoperative recovery by providing regionally focused, opioid-sparing pain control without clinically significant sedation. Overall, current data support the SCPB as a dependable, well-tolerated, and clinically practical approach for managing post-craniotomy pain in patients undergoing occipital approaches. In this narrative review, we will discuss the mechanism of action and anatomy, the clinical application, safety and tolerability, patient outcomes, and emerging future directions of the superficial cervical plexus block and how it mitigates post-occipital craniotomy pain. Full article

Opioids are among the most effective drugs for treating moderate to severe pain. Unfortunately, opioid use, even short-term, can lead to addiction, tolerance, overdose, and respiratory depression. Therefore, efforts to design and develop novel compounds that would retain analgesic activity while reducing side effects continue unabated. The present study was designed to investigate the respiratory and cardiovascular effects of the hybrid peptide LENART01, which has evidenced potent antinociceptive and antimicrobial activity. This hybrid peptide, composed of N-terminally located dermorphin and C-terminal modified ranatensin pharmacophore, was tested in vivo in anesthetized rats. The main effect of LENART01 was apnea in 70% of examined animals, sighing, and a significant increase in blood pressure. Interestingly, the hybrid induced sighs less frequently than ranatensin, and apnea dependent on vagus nerve mu opioid receptor activation much less frequently and less intensely than dermorphin itself. This shows that LENART01 is a safer opioid system-related agent as compared to dermorphin for its prospective use in the treatment of pain. Full article

Background and objectives: Duloxetine is widely used for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), and various types of neuropathic pain. While its efficacy is well documented in clinical trials, less is known about how it is perceived and utilized in routine psychiatric practice. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a cross-sectional observational study involving 80 psychiatrists from Spain to assess real-world clinical attitudes toward duloxetine. Methods: Participants completed a 20-item multiple-choice questionnaire that examined familiarity, perceived efficacy in multiple conditions (MDD, GAD, neuropathic pain, somatization, and quality of life), and perspectives on tolerability, safety, adherence, and overall satisfaction. Results: Survey results indicated that a large majority of psychiatrists frequently prescribe duloxetine, particularly for patients with MDD and comorbid chronic pain. Notably, 94% rated it as either “more effective” or “much more effective” for diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain. Psychiatrists reported a high perceived efficacy of duloxetine: 94% rated it as “more effective” or “much more effective” for diabetic peripheral neuropathy, and 93% gave similarly positive ratings for general neuropathic pain. For somatization, 70% found it “effective” or “very effective”, and 83% observed improvements in quality of life for many of their patients. Psychiatrists generally reported favorable perceptions of duloxetine’s tolerability profile: 97.5% rated it as the antidepressant associated with the least weight gain, and 82.5% perceived fewer sexual side effects compared to other options. Sedation and gastrointestinal side effects were generally considered mild or less severe. In terms of treatment adherence, 69% rated it as “better” or “much better” than other antidepressants, and 80% found its combination with other antidepressants to be “favorable” or “very favorable”. Overall satisfaction was high, with 99% of psychiatrists reporting being either “satisfied” or “very satisfied” with its use. The side effect profile was generally viewed as manageable, with low perceived rates of weight gain, sedation, and sexual dysfunction. Furthermore, 96% of respondents expressed a willingness to recommend duloxetine to their colleagues. Conclusions: Psychiatrists reported highly favorable attitudes toward duloxetine, viewing it as a flexible treatment option in routine care. However, these findings reflect clinicians’ subjective perceptions rather than objective clinical outcomes and should be interpreted accordingly. Full article

The effectiveness of ultrasound (US)-guided compared with blind corticosteroid injections for the treatment of plantar fasciitis (PF) remains uncertain. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical benefits of US-guided over blind injections in patients with PF. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus was conducted, collecting articles published up to 20 April 2025. Randomized controlled trials comparing US-guided and blind corticosteroid injections for PF were included. The extracted outcome measures, i.e., visual analog scale (VAS), heel tenderness index (HTI), tenderness threshold (TT), and plantar fascia thickness, were assessed at short- (2–6 weeks) and long-term (≥12 weeks) follow-ups. Compared with the blind injection group, the US-guided group showed significantly greater improvement in TT at both short- and long-term follow-ups, as well as a greater reduction in plantar fascia thickness. However, no significant differences were found between the two groups in VAS and HTI scores. US-guided corticosteroid injections provide superior clinical benefits compared with blind injections in patients with PF, particularly in enhancing mechanical pain tolerance and reducing plantar fascia thickness. Nevertheless, these findings should be interpreted with caution due to the limited methodological quality of the included studies. Full article

Objective: A combination of midazolam and opioid is usually used to achieve conscious sedation and analgesia during colonoscopy, but many patients may tolerate the procedure well without any sedation. This randomized trial aimed to compare the efficacy and recovery time of 3 different regimens consisting of (a) midazolam plus meperidine (b) midazolam plus fentanyl and (c) placebo. The endoscopists’ and patients’ satisfaction was assessed by an appropriate questionnaire. Methods: A total 248 consecutive, unselected patients attending outpatient colonoscopy at a University Hospital were enrolled with informed consent and were randomized to receive (a) midazolam with meperidine [group A] (b) midazolam with fentanyl [group B] or (c) placebo [group C]. Data for procedure times, perceived patient’s discomfort (using a relative patient questionnaire) and physician’s satisfaction from the procedure were collected. Patients and all endoscopy staff directly involved with the procedure except the research nurse were blinded to the regimens used. Results: The mean age of the patients was 58 ± 15 years (range 19–85 years) and 130 were males. The completion rate and time to reach cecum did not differ among the three groups. The recovery time was significantly shorter in group C (placebo, 10.4 ± 2.9 min) compared to the other groups (p < 0.000), but it was also shorter in group B (midazolam plus fentanyl, 43.0 ± 9.3 min) compared to group A (midazolam plus pethidine, 50.1 ± 9.0 min) (p = 0.001). Patients of group B (midazolam plus fentanyl) experienced less pain and discomfort than patients of group A (midazolam plus meperidine) (p = 0.02) and patients of group A experienced less pain than patients of group C (placebo). Many more patients in group B were extremely or very satisfied by the procedure(86.7%) compared to group A (59.7%) and group C (44.5%) (p = 0.001). Adverse events were mild in all groups and slightly less in group B. Conclusions: Sedation with midazolam and fentanyl was more effective, better tolerated and led to slightly faster recovery time than sedation with midazolam and meperidine. According to our findings and the literature, the most appropriate regimen for conscious sedation during colonoscopy is the combination of midazolam and fentanyl. However, both sedation regimens were proven to be effective and safe and even a significant proportion of unsedated patients could tolerate the procedure fairly well. Full article

Background: Oral mucositis (OM) is a common and debilitating complication of cancer therapy, particularly in patients undergoing chemotherapy and radiotherapy. It significantly impairs quality of life and may necessitate the interruption of cancer treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of OROSOL, an oral spray device, in managing oral mucositis in pediatric patients undergoing chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Methods: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial compared OROSOL to a placebo in children with oral mucositis aged 3 to 17 years. Participants were followed for 28 days with regular medical visits. The primary endpoints were changes in the Oral Assessment Guide (OAG) scores and key symptoms (mucositis score, difficulty in oral feeding, ulceration and erythema, and pain sensation). Safety was assessed via adverse events and local tolerability. Results: Both groups were demographically balanced at baseline (p > 0.6). OROSOL demonstrated significantly greater improvements in the mucositis score beginning on Day 7 (p = 0.0122) and maintained superiority through Day 28 (p = 0.0007). Notable reductions in mucositis severity were observed, with significantly faster relief in the OROSOL group compared to the placebo (p < 0.001 for most timepoints). Oral feeding difficulty also showed a marked decline, with significant improvements starting from Day 5 (p = 0.0153). Ulceration and erythema scores significantly decreased from Day 14 onwards (p = 0.0188). Pain sensation showed a marked reduction from Day 14 (p = 0.0014). No serious adverse events were reported, and tolerability was consistent across all participants. Conclusions: OROSOL has a significant impact on reducing mucositis severity, oral feeding difficulty, ulceration, erythema, and pain. Coupled with its excellent safety profile, it is a valuable therapeutic option. This treatment is particularly beneficial for pediatric patients, ensuring improved comfort and recovery without notable adverse effects. Full article

(1) Background: Previous studies indicate that individuals who engage in regular physical activity have a higher pain threshold than those who do not exercise. However, it remains unclear how this phenomenon behaves in individuals exposed to chronic hypoxia. This study evaluates pain perception at high altitude between high-altitude natives who exercised regularly and those who did not practice physical activity. (2) Methods: Eighty-four healthy volunteers aged 20 to 30 years old with a body mass index (BMI) within the normal range (18.5–24.9) residing in the city of Puno (3825 m) were recruited. The unilateral ischemia pain provocation test was used, applying pressure with a manual sphygmomanometer to generate transient ischemia in the arm while the patient opens and closes their hand. Onset, peak, and resolution times of pain, heart rate, and oxygen saturation were recorded. (3) Results: The average time to pain onset in the right arm was 30.2 s ± 14.1 during light physical activity, whereas, during moderate physical activity, it increased to 32.5 s ± 15.4. In the left arm, the average time until pain sensation was 27.9 s ± 16.8 during light physical activity and increased to 34.6 s ± 18.5 with moderate physical activity. Regarding the progression of pain intensity, the average time to reach unbearable pain in the right arm was 54.1 s ± 16.4 during light physical activity and 53.8 s ± 19.6 during moderate physical activity; in the left arm, it was 53.0 s ± 19.6 during light physical activity, increasing to 59.3 s ± 24.5 during moderate physical activity. (4) Conclusions: A more stable and slightly higher pain tolerance in the dominant arm was observed. Full article