Search Results (8)

This work addresses whether heterogeneity in player endowments influences investment decisions in common pool resource (CPR) games, shedding light on the relationship between inequality and economic decision making. We explore two theoretical avenues from behavioral economics—linear other-regarding preferences and inequity aversion—and examine the predictions of each with a laboratory experiment. Our experimental results roundly reject the majority of these explanations: in treatments with endowment inequality, high endowment individuals invest more in the common pool resource than low endowment individuals. We discuss these results in the context of the literature on psychological entitlement and positional preferences. Full article

Public goods games under asymmetric endowments have been widely discussed in the literature; however, few studies have addressed how inequality influences normative beliefs and the subsequent burden-sharing behaviors. To address this gap, we conducted two online survey experiments in both hypothetical and real-income scenarios, focusing on the mediation effects of self-serving bias and other-regarding preferences. The findings showed that while unequal endowment status induced self-serving personal beliefs and burden-sharing behaviors, it also enhanced reciprocity and offset self-serving bias in a real-income scenario. Only high-endowment status significantly influenced beliefs and behaviors. This study reveals a trade-off between self-serving bias and reciprocity in social cooperation, offering new insights for fairness beliefs. Full article

Despite heightened sustainability agendas, green purchase behavior (GPB) remains uneven. This study develops a motive–mechanism account that distinguishes personal (self-regarding) and civic (other-regarding) motivation and specifies how these parallel motives operate through a dual-barrier/relational-enabler layer. Using survey data from urban consumers in China (n = 420) and structural equation modeling with bias-corrected bootstrapped indirect effects, we test a dual-path mediation model in which perceived cost and perceived risk function as inhibitory mechanisms, while social capital operates as a relational amplifier. Results indicate that both motivations positively predict GPB; cost and risk suppress GPB; and social capital facilitates GPB. Indirect effects via all three mediators are significant, yet direct paths from both motivations to GPB remain, indicating partial mediation. Two regularities are noteworthy: a pattern of motivational symmetry, whereby personal and civic motives exhibit comparable direct associations with behavior, and an attenuated risk pathway relative to cost, suggesting affordability—more than uncertainty—constrains adoption in the observed market context. Theoretically, the findings integrate TPB–VBN insights into a dual-motive, dual-barrier, relational-enabler framework that positions social capital as a conversion-efficiency multiplier and clarifies scope conditions under which each pathway dominates. Practically, the results prioritize interventions that lower out-of-pocket costs, reduce the salience of uncertainty, and leverage community trust and peer visibility. Full article

Businesses are facing consistent pressures from stakeholders to be socially responsible although the economic benefits of corporate social responsibility (CSR) have been found to be mixed. We aim to reveal stakeholders’ motivations for demanding CSR by studying stakeholders’ stated preferences on companies’ contribution to the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in three different contexts, purchasing, investing, and job-seeking. We conducted conjoint survey experiments—embedded information treatments targeting the public in Japan (n = 12,098) in 2019 and 2020. The results showed that stakeholders demanded corporations to contribute to international-related issues rather than domestic-related issues. Stakeholders’ support was low when the companies profited from contributing to the SDGs. These results suggest that social context reflects the preferences of stakeholders on corporates’ SDG activities. Overall, raising awareness had effects on stakeholders’ support and to what extent the information affected the decisions of stakeholders was varied by stakeholders. Full article

Can differences in cognitive reflection explain other-regarding behavior? To test this, I use the three-item Cognitive Reflection Task to classify individuals as intuitive or reflective and correlate this measure with choices in three games that each subject participates in. The main sample consists of 236 individuals who completed the dictator game, ultimatum game and a third-party punishment task. Subjects afterwards completed the three-item Cognitive Reflection Test. Results showed that intuitive individuals acted more prosocially in all social dilemma tasks. These individuals were more likely to serve as a norm enforcer and third-party punish a selfish act in the dictator game. Reflective individuals were found more likely to act consistently in a self-interested manner across the three games. Full article

The paper investigates actions and decisions of agricultural resource users and explores their implications for institutional change and natural resource management in the post-socialist context of Central Asia. More specifically, the authors propose a novel methodological approach for the aforementioned context to support policy-relevant research that explicitly addresses behavioral responses of pastoralists in Kyrgyzstan. The paper builds on distributive and economic theories of institutional change and combines findings from lab and field framed economic experiments with complementary qualitative methods (questionnaires, group discussions and semi-structured interviews). By these means the authors test the impact of a specific variable on institutional change in pasture use: the role of power and specifically the difference in the ability of players to “survive” in a bargaining game without an agreement. The impact of power asymmetries and its implications for cooperation and the efficiency of bargaining outcomes are discussed and analyzed. Experimental results largely confirm findings reported in the literature: as players learn about the game and the behavior of others, they adjust their decisions accordingly; the subjects also exhibit other-regarding preferences, resulting to the prevalence of relatively equally distributed gains as an outcome. Furthermore, the findings of the study suggest that under the condition of incomplete information about the preferences of other players, the experimental subjects internalize the game as a group. The authors propose that an explanatory variable for such situations might be that actual shared beliefs of pasture users assist players to economize on information processing and coordinate the bargaining in an effective way. From this perspective, the paper raises a series of questions regarding the proposition that power asymmetry leads to inefficient bargaining outcomes, and provides some first insights for further investigation. Full article

Over the past decade, many researchers have used food donation tasks to test whether nonhuman primates show human-like patterns of prosocial behavior in experimental settings. Although these tasks are elegant in their simplicity, performance within and across species is difficult to explain under a unified theoretical framework. Here, we attempt to better understand variation in prosociality by examining the circumstances that promote and hinder the expression of prosocial preferences. To this end, we tested whether capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella)—a species that has previously demonstrated prosocial preferences—would behave prosocially using a novel touchscreen task. In contrast to previous studies, we found that capuchins as a group did not prosocially deliver food to a partner. Importantly however, data from control conditions revealed that subjects demonstrated limited understanding of the reward contingencies of the task. We also compared individuals’ performance in the current study with their performance in a previously published prosociality study. We conclude by discussing how continuing to explore intraspecies variation in performance on prosocial tasks may help inform debates regarding the existence of other-regarding preferences in nonhuman species. Full article

We investigate to what extent genuine social preferences can explain observed other-regarding behavior. In a dictator game variant subjects can choose whether to learn about the consequences of their choice for the receiver. We find that a majority of subjects showing other-regarding behavior when the payoffs of the receiver are known, choose to ignore these consequences if possible. This behavior is inconsistent with preferences about outcomes. Other-regarding behavior may also be explained by avoiding cognitive dissonance as in Konow (2000). Our experiment’s choice data is in line with this approach. In addition, we successfully relate individual behavior to proxies for cognitive dissonance. Full article