Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (205)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = non-financial sustainability reporting

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
21 pages, 487 KiB  
Article
A Set of Sustainability Indicators for Brazilian Small and Medium-Sized Non-Alcoholic Beverage Industries
by Alexandre André Feil, Angie Lorena Garcia Zapata, Mayra Alejandra Parada Lazo, Maria Clair da Rosa, Jordana de Oliveira and Dusan Schreiber
Sustainability 2025, 17(15), 6794; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17156794 - 25 Jul 2025
Viewed by 354
Abstract
Sustainability in the non-alcoholic beverage industry requires effective metrics to assess environmental, social, and economic performance. However, the lack of standardised indicators for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) hinders the implementation of sustainable strategies. This study aims to select a set of sustainability [...] Read more.
Sustainability in the non-alcoholic beverage industry requires effective metrics to assess environmental, social, and economic performance. However, the lack of standardised indicators for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) hinders the implementation of sustainable strategies. This study aims to select a set of sustainability indicators for small and medium-sized non-alcoholic beverage industries in Brazil. Seventy-four indicators were identified based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) guidelines, which were subsequently evaluated and refined by industry experts for prioritisation. Statistical analysis led to the selection of 31 final indicators, distributed across environmental (10), social (12), and economic (9) dimensions. In the environmental dimension, priority indicators include water management, energy efficiency, carbon emissions, and waste recycling. The social dimension highlights working conditions, occupational safety, gender equity, and impacts on local communities. In the economic dimension, key indicators relate to supply chain efficiency, technological innovation, financial transparency, and anti-corruption practices. The results provide a robust framework to guide managers in adopting sustainable practices and support policymakers in improving the environmental, social, and economic performance of small and medium-sized non-alcoholic beverage industries. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 502 KiB  
Article
Ethical Leadership and Its Impact on Corporate Sustainability and Financial Performance: The Role of Alignment with the Sustainable Development Goals
by Aws AlHares
Sustainability 2025, 17(15), 6682; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17156682 - 22 Jul 2025
Viewed by 577
Abstract
This study examines the influence of ethical leadership on corporate sustainability and financial performance, highlighting the moderating effect of firms’ commitment to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Utilizing panel data from 420 automotive companies spanning 2015 to 2024, the analysis applies [...] Read more.
This study examines the influence of ethical leadership on corporate sustainability and financial performance, highlighting the moderating effect of firms’ commitment to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Utilizing panel data from 420 automotive companies spanning 2015 to 2024, the analysis applies the System Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) to control for endogeneity and unobserved heterogeneity. All data were gathered from the Refinitiv Eikon Platform (LSEG) and annual reports. Panel GMM regression is used to estimate the relationship to deal with the endogeneity problem. The results reveal that ethical leadership significantly improves corporate sustainability performance—measured by ESG scores from Refinitiv Eikon and Bloomberg—as well as financial indicators like Return on Assets (ROA) and Tobin’s Q. Additionally, firms that demonstrate breadth (the range of SDG-related themes addressed), concentration (the distribution of non-financial disclosures across SDGs), and depth (the overall volume of SDG-related information) in their SDG disclosures gain greater advantages from ethical leadership, resulting in enhanced ESG performance and higher market valuation. This study offers valuable insights for corporate leaders, policymakers, and investors on how integrating ethical leadership with SDG alignment can drive sustainable and financial growth. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 432 KiB  
Article
Does Financial Performance Improve the Quality of Sustainability Reporting? Exploring the Moderating Effect of Corporate Governance
by Aws AlHares
Sustainability 2025, 17(13), 6123; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17136123 - 3 Jul 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 631
Abstract
This study examines the interplay of financial performance, corporate governance, and sustainability reporting quality (SRQ), addressing the need to enhance corporate transparency and accountability in an emerging market context. Guided by agency and stakeholder theories, this study investigated the effects of board size, [...] Read more.
This study examines the interplay of financial performance, corporate governance, and sustainability reporting quality (SRQ), addressing the need to enhance corporate transparency and accountability in an emerging market context. Guided by agency and stakeholder theories, this study investigated the effects of board size, independence, diversity, and experience on SRQ, along with the moderating role of governance in the financial performance–SRQ relationship. Using an explanatory research design and quantitative approach, data from 88 listed firms in premier markets from 2015 to 2024 were analyzed using ordered logistic regression. All data were gathered from the Refinitiv Eikon Platform (LSEG), annual reports. Panel GMM regression is used to estimate the relationship to deal with the endogeneity problem. The findings reveal that board size and experience positively influence SRQ, highlighting the role of diverse expertise and seasoned directors in fostering sustainability. Financial performance alone was not significantly associated with SRQ. However, robust governance structures enhanced the translation of financial resources into improved reporting quality. Firm size emerged as a key determinant, with larger firms exhibiting higher SRQ, while financial firms lagged compared to non-financial sectors. This study concludes that corporate governance is pivotal in shaping SRQ, particularly in resource-constrained environments. This study contributes to the literature by bridging governance, financial performance, and sustainability, offering practical insights for policymakers and corporate leaders to improve SRQ through regulatory frameworks and governance reforms. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Economic and Business Aspects of Sustainability)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 759 KiB  
Article
Exploring How Corporate Maturity Moderates the Value Relevance of ESG Disclosures in Sustainable Reporting: Evidence from Bangladesh’s Developing Market
by Saleh Mohammed Mashehdul Islam
Sustainability 2025, 17(13), 5936; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17135936 - 27 Jun 2025
Viewed by 611
Abstract
This study investigated how corporate maturity—measured through firm age and lifecycle stage—moderates the value relevance of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) disclosures in a frontier market context, using Bangladesh as a case study. Drawing on panel data from 2011–2012 to 2023–2024 for 86 [...] Read more.
This study investigated how corporate maturity—measured through firm age and lifecycle stage—moderates the value relevance of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) disclosures in a frontier market context, using Bangladesh as a case study. Drawing on panel data from 2011–2012 to 2023–2024 for 86 publicly listed non-financial firms, the study employed a modified Ohlson valuation framework, panel regression analysis, and multiple robustness techniques (2SLS, PSM). ESG disclosure was measured using a researcher-developed index aligned with international reporting standards (GRI, SASB, TCFD, UN SDGs). ESG disclosures are positively associated with firm value, but this relationship is significantly moderated by corporate maturity. Younger firms exhibit a stronger valuation effect from ESG transparency, driven by higher signaling and legitimacy needs. In contrast, mature firms experience a diminished marginal benefit, reflecting routine compliance rather than strategic differentiation. These findings challenge the uniform application of ESG assessment models and suggest the need for lifecycle-adjusted disclosure ratings, particularly in nascent regulatory environments like Bangladesh. Investors and regulators should tailor ESG evaluation criteria by firm age and industry sustainability exposure. Younger firms, often overlooked, may carry outsized ESG signaling value in emerging markets. Enhancing ESG transparency among younger firms can foster greater stakeholder trust, support inclusive growth, and strengthen social accountability in emerging economies. This study contributes to the ESG literature by introducing corporate maturity as a key moderating variable in value relevance analysis. It provides new empirical insights from a developing economy and proposes lifecycle-based adaptations to global ESG rating methodologies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Business Model Innovation and Corporate Sustainability)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 315 KiB  
Systematic Review
A Systematic Review of the Effects of Mandatory Corporate Sustainability Reporting
by Triantafyllos Papafloratos and Tania Pantazi
Sustainability 2025, 17(12), 5336; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17125336 - 9 Jun 2025
Viewed by 1347
Abstract
An increasing number of countries are introducing regulations on mandatory sustainability reporting, while researchers from various disciplines are trying to evaluate the effects of rendering sustainability reports mandatory. We conducted a review of 171 articles in Scopus-indexed journals, aiming to identify the most [...] Read more.
An increasing number of countries are introducing regulations on mandatory sustainability reporting, while researchers from various disciplines are trying to evaluate the effects of rendering sustainability reports mandatory. We conducted a review of 171 articles in Scopus-indexed journals, aiming to identify the most prominent topics and key research outputs. Our findings are categorized into four broad themes: the effects of legislation on the quality and quantity of the reports, the effects of financial performance on firms, the effects of ESG performance on firms and other effects. This is the first review to include a large number of empirical and non-empirical studies from various disciplines, including law. The positive effect of legislation on the quality, credibility and comparability of reports is more pronounced for countries outside Europe. The effects related to the financial performance of firms are positive in the long run. At the same time, regulation induces companies to adopt more CSR initiatives and may therefore be seen as an effective tool in rendering businesses more sustainable. Other perceived effects of increasing regulation are the fragmentation, complexity and rapid evolvement of the legislative framework on sustainability reporting, as well as the role of the institutional environment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Governance: ESG Practices in the Modern Corporation)
27 pages, 1082 KiB  
Review
An Assessment of the Roles of the Government, Regulators, and Investors in ESG Implementation in South Africa: A Scoping Review
by Wilfreda Indira Chawarura, Mabutho Sibanda and Kuziva Mamvura
Adm. Sci. 2025, 15(6), 220; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15060220 - 5 Jun 2025
Viewed by 804
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to detect from the literature the roles of the Government, investors, and regulators in ESG implementation in South Africa from 2002 to 2022. ESG implementation in South Africa ensures sustainable business practices are adopted by firms operating [...] Read more.
The purpose of this study was to detect from the literature the roles of the Government, investors, and regulators in ESG implementation in South Africa from 2002 to 2022. ESG implementation in South Africa ensures sustainable business practices are adopted by firms operating within the country. The study used a scoping review methodology, with only articles in the English language being considered. A pilot search was carried out to identify key search phrases to be included in the search strategy. A total of 208 articles were identified and only 34 articles were eligible for the study. The results show an increase in ESG implementation by institutional investors, although investor activism is still low in South Africa. The South African Government actively enacted laws and regulations that supported ESG implementation after the global financial crisis of 2007–8. However, in recent years, there has been a lack of hard laws to support the non-legislative ESG rules that dominate ESG reporting. The study shows that the South African Government should improve its ESG laws for effective ESG adoption and avoid relying on the JSE, which enforces the King Code as a mandatory listing requirement to monitor ESG implementation. Training, capacity building, and active Government participation are critical for effective ESG implementation in South Africa. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Strategic Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 618 KiB  
Review
A Scoping Review for Hamstring Injury Risk Monitoring in Australian Rules Football
by Dale Wilson Chapman, Sorcha Humphreys, Shannon Spencer, Nathan Tai, Dag Øyen, Kevin Netto and Robert Waller
Encyclopedia 2025, 5(2), 72; https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5020072 - 27 May 2025
Viewed by 1092
Abstract
Hamstring strain injuries (HSIs) are the most common time loss injury sustained in male Australian Football League (AFL) athletes, causing significant financial cost, time cost, and impaired team and individual performance. In a squad of 42 players, HSIs accounted for 4.86 new injuries [...] Read more.
Hamstring strain injuries (HSIs) are the most common time loss injury sustained in male Australian Football League (AFL) athletes, causing significant financial cost, time cost, and impaired team and individual performance. In a squad of 42 players, HSIs accounted for 4.86 new injuries sustained by players per club per AFL season in 2020. This is consistent with injury reporting over the last decade in AFL, despite best efforts to reduce the rate. This scoping review sought to firstly identify the reported hamstring injury prevention risk factors in elite AFL, discern the impact of these factors, and map the gaps in the current literature using a biopsychosocial understanding of injury prevention. The scoping review process was based on the Askey and O’Malley framework. Five relevant online databases (MEDLINE, Proquest, CINAHL, SPORTdiscuss, and EMBASE) were systematically searched using a series of Boolean and operator terms following the PRISMA-ScR protocol using the criteria: (1) assessing male professional/elite athletes in AFL; (2) written in English and peer-reviewed; (3) full text available; and (4) published after 2006. Only manuscripts that fit the search terms and inclusion criteria were retained in the scoping review. Following an initial search, 246 potential studies were identified, with 12 studies meeting the inclusion criteria after full-text screening. The risk factors examined were subclassified into modifiable and non-modifiable categories. Modifiable factors include high-speed running exposure, gluteus medius activation, eccentric hamstring strength, shorter bicep femoris fascicle length, use of interchange, and hamstring stiffness. Non-modifiable factors include previous history of HSI and limb injury, age, and size of injury on MRI. This scoping review highlights the need for continued monitoring of high-speed running volumes as rapid increases in completed distances present as a substantial risk factor. The modifiable mechanistic risk factors of eccentric hamstring strength and hamstring stiffness were identified as important components of player screening to reduce the risk of future HSI. Risk factors identified throughout will help develop comprehensive injury profiling for athletes. Further research is warranted to develop a holistic approach to injury profiling. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Medicine & Pharmacology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

29 pages, 967 KiB  
Article
A Greener Paradigm Shift: The Moderating Role of Board Independence in Sustainability Reporting
by Abid Noor, Rohail Hassan, Costinela Fortea and Valentin Marian Antohi
Sustainability 2025, 17(11), 4776; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17114776 - 22 May 2025
Viewed by 929
Abstract
This study investigates the moderating role of independent directors on corporate boards in raising the ESG reporting for non-financial listed firms in Pakistan to strive for a greener revolution around the economy. A sample of 369 firms listed and operated on the Pakistan [...] Read more.
This study investigates the moderating role of independent directors on corporate boards in raising the ESG reporting for non-financial listed firms in Pakistan to strive for a greener revolution around the economy. A sample of 369 firms listed and operated on the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX) for a period covering 2012–2023 (both inclusive) have been taken out of a target population of 456 non-financial listed firms. The results are investigated using bivariate, multiple, and hierarchical regression analyses. This study has significant findings in the context of Pakistan and can be generalized to struggling economies around the globe. The interventional role of independent directors has significant findings for the full model. Findings from the Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy Score (CSRSS) are inconclusive irrespective of the measurement method used, i.e., environmental innovation score (EIS) or environmental pillar score (EPS). Environmental, Social, Governance Score (ESGS) has revealed a positive and significant impact when EIS is used as a performance variable, whereas when EPS is taken as a performance measure, the results are significant and negative. Under the lens of stakeholders’ theory, upper echelon theory, and agency theory, this study contributes to the corporate governance domain and the literature on environmental improvisation and ESG reporting. Researchers, statutory authorities, and academicians can benefit from it. The vital role of independent directors is the key to developing economies to strive for a sustained greener environment. This study is the first in the Asian and, specifically, Pakistani context to take on the interventional role of independent directors in promoting ESG reporting requirements for corporate greener revolution efforts. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 854 KiB  
Article
Measuring CSR with Accounting Information Systems Through a Managerial Model for Sustainable Economic Development
by Loredana Cristina Tănase, Valentin Radu, Alina Iuliana Tăbîrcă, Violeta State, Florin Radu, Laura Marcu and Cristina Maria Voinea
Sustainability 2025, 17(10), 4712; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17104712 - 20 May 2025
Viewed by 723
Abstract
In the European Union’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) context, organizations must increasingly integrate non-financial indicators into their reporting structures. The role of accounting information in establishing a comprehensive model for measuring corporate social responsibility (CSR) is critical due to its inherent characteristics. [...] Read more.
In the European Union’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) context, organizations must increasingly integrate non-financial indicators into their reporting structures. The role of accounting information in establishing a comprehensive model for measuring corporate social responsibility (CSR) is critical due to its inherent characteristics. This study proposes a structured model for measuring CSR performance using accounting information systems (AIS) as an analytical and operational support tool. The research investigates the extent to which financial analysts and auditors use AIS to evaluate specific CSR indicators related to employee satisfaction, environmental impact, and customer relations and how these contribute to a global CSR index. The study is based on a quantitative survey conducted among accounting professionals in Romania using a structured questionnaire, analyzed through correlation-based models. The findings reveal a statistically significant association between AIS usage and the capacity to quantify CSR performance, with clear distinctions based on professional roles and areas of expertise. This article contributes to the literature by demonstrating how AIS can operationalize sustainability reporting frameworks and support the transition toward evidence-based CSR assessments. The proposed model offers a practical tool for organizations to improve transparency, stakeholder engagement, and strategic alignment with sustainability objectives. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Economic Development and Business Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 1903 KiB  
Article
The Role of Reputation and Regulation in Shaping Non-Financial Information Reporting
by Melanie Grueso-Gala and Sergio Camisón-Haba
Adm. Sci. 2025, 15(5), 174; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15050174 - 7 May 2025
Viewed by 608
Abstract
This study explores how corporate reputation and regulation influence the quantity and quality of non-financial information (NFI) disclosure. While internal drivers of NFI reporting are well-studied, external pressures remain underexplored. Analyzing Ibex35 firms (2015–2019) during Spain’s adoption of Directive 2014/95/EU, the study uses [...] Read more.
This study explores how corporate reputation and regulation influence the quantity and quality of non-financial information (NFI) disclosure. While internal drivers of NFI reporting are well-studied, external pressures remain underexplored. Analyzing Ibex35 firms (2015–2019) during Spain’s adoption of Directive 2014/95/EU, the study uses panel data analysis to assess the impact of reputation and regulation on NFI reporting. The findings show that highly reputed firms disclose more extensive and higher-quality NFI, while regulatory changes significantly improve both variables of NFI reporting. Thus, firms go beyond mere compliance. By distinguishing between quality and quantity, the study clarifies conflicting prior findings and highlights the complementary roles of reputation and regulation in fostering transparency. The results offer valuable insights for managers and policymakers, enhancing stakeholder trust and the effectiveness of regulation in promoting corporate transparency. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 555 KiB  
Article
Digital Transformation, CEO Compensation, and ESG Performance: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies
by Caiming Nie, Dor Kushinsky and Ting Ren
Sustainability 2025, 17(9), 4033; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17094033 - 30 Apr 2025
Viewed by 1351
Abstract
As sustainability reporting and ESG disclosure gain global importance, understanding the factors influencing ESG outcomes becomes crucial for policymakers, investors, and corporate decision-makers. China, a major player in the global economy, has recently taken steps to align its stock exchanges with international ESG [...] Read more.
As sustainability reporting and ESG disclosure gain global importance, understanding the factors influencing ESG outcomes becomes crucial for policymakers, investors, and corporate decision-makers. China, a major player in the global economy, has recently taken steps to align its stock exchanges with international ESG reporting standards. In this context, the study examines the individual and joint effects of digital transformation and CEO compensation on ESG performance, considering moderating factors such as firm size, state ownership, and CEO age and gender. The research employs a comprehensive dataset containing 16,205 firm-year observations from 2018 to 2022, combining financial data, ESG ratings, and a matrix of word frequencies related to digital transformation extracted from annual reports. The study adopts a firm-year two-way fixed effect model, utilizing panel data and control variables to address potential endogeneity concerns and unobserved firm heterogeneity. The findings provide evidence supporting the positive impact of digital transformation and CEO compensation on ESG performance. The level of digital transformation is positively associated with ESG performance. This relationship is stronger for larger firms and firms with older CEOs, while state-owned enterprises show mixed results compared to non-SOEs. However, the effect of CEO compensation and ESG performance is stronger for male CEOs. This study thus contributes to the growing literature on ESG performance, digital transformation, and executive compensation by providing insights into their relationships in the context of Chinese listed companies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 658 KiB  
Article
Can Climate Risk Disclosure Attract Analyst Coverage? A Study Based on the Dual Perspective of Information Supply and Demand
by Mengxue Li and Sheng Yao
Sustainability 2025, 17(9), 3960; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17093960 - 28 Apr 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 812
Abstract
In the context of the intensifying global climate change and its associated risks, the interaction between corporate climate risk disclosure and analyst forecasting behavior has become a pivotal scholarly focus in sustainability research. This study uses a sample of 20,978 firm-year observations from [...] Read more.
In the context of the intensifying global climate change and its associated risks, the interaction between corporate climate risk disclosure and analyst forecasting behavior has become a pivotal scholarly focus in sustainability research. This study uses a sample of 20,978 firm-year observations from non-financial Chinese A-share listed companies over the period 2007–2021 to examine the impact of corporate climate risk disclosure on analyst coverage, applying ordinary least squares (OLS) regression. The results reveal a positive relationship between corporate climate risk disclosure and analyst coverage. This positive effect is more prominent in firms with lower annual report readability, a higher proportion of independent institutional investors, and in contexts involving team analysts or analysts from large brokerage firms. Mechanism analysis reveals two pathways for increased analyst coverage: increasing institutional investors’ demand for information and reducing analysts’ reliance on on-site research to uncover private information. Further research reveals that severe and chronic risk disclosures attract more analyst coverage than transition risk disclosures. Additionally, climate risk disclosure can significantly reduce analyst forecast dispersion and long-term forecast bias. Overall, this study holds important implications for improving corporate climate risk disclosure practices and enhancing analysts’ role as information intermediaries. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 253 KiB  
Article
Environmental Accounting Disclosures and Financial Performance: Evidence from the Banking Sector
by Meral Gündüz and Murat Gündüz
Sustainability 2025, 17(8), 3569; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083569 - 16 Apr 2025
Viewed by 1410
Abstract
This study aims to investigate the impact of environmental accounting disclosures on the financial performance of banks listed on Borsa Istanbul (BIST). In this study, sustainability and integrated reports for 2019–2023 are analyzed, and environmental accounting disclosures are classified into two categories as [...] Read more.
This study aims to investigate the impact of environmental accounting disclosures on the financial performance of banks listed on Borsa Istanbul (BIST). In this study, sustainability and integrated reports for 2019–2023 are analyzed, and environmental accounting disclosures are classified into two categories as operational and financial activities. Using the Environmental Accounting Reporting Score, the relationship with financial performance indicators such as return on assets, return on equity, earnings per share, and profit margin is analyzed using the seemingly unrelated regression (SUR) method. The results show that environmental accounting disclosures do not have a direct and statistically significant effect on financial performance. However, control variables such as bank size, debt-to-asset ratio, and loan-to-asset ratio are found to have a positive effect on financial performance. In particular, larger banks tend to have higher profitability and earnings per share, while higher non-interest expenses have a negative impact on profitability. The study shows that the direct contribution of environmental accounting practices to financial performance is limited, but that banks’ operational and financial structures are greater determinants of performance. These findings highlight the need for improvements in areas such as standardization of sustainability reporting, stakeholder awareness, and environmental risk management for policy makers and banks. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Economic and Business Aspects of Sustainability)
19 pages, 500 KiB  
Article
The Impact of Family Business Governance on Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance
by Hsiang-Hua Yang, Yung-Chih Lien and Bao-Huei Huang
Sustainability 2025, 17(8), 3472; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083472 - 13 Apr 2025
Viewed by 928
Abstract
This study examines the impact of family directors, family shareholding, and family control on the environmental and social dimensions of ESG in family business governance. Scholars debate whether family businesses prioritize short-term gains over long-term ESG issues or, due to their long-term focus, [...] Read more.
This study examines the impact of family directors, family shareholding, and family control on the environmental and social dimensions of ESG in family business governance. Scholars debate whether family businesses prioritize short-term gains over long-term ESG issues or, due to their long-term focus, integrate ESG into their strategies. One group of scholars argues that family businesses tend to focus excessively on short-term financial performance, neglecting long-term non-financial performance. In contrast, another group contends that due to socioemotional wealth considerations, family businesses place particular emphasis on long-term non-financial performance. This study utilizes data from publicly listed companies in Taiwan to conduct relevant research. Furthermore, we incorporate external governance variables to examine their impact on environmental and social performance. The research data come from the TEJ database. The sample is the annual data of listed companies in Taiwan. The sample period covers 2015 to 2022, with a total of 4377 company-year observations. The study finds that the corporate governance mechanisms of family enterprises have a negative and significant impact on environmental and social performance. However, external governance factors, such as higher institutional investor shareholding ratios, third-party-verified sustainability reports, and corporate governance evaluations, help mitigate these negative effects. Future research could extend the study period and explore additional external governance variables or alternative datasets to enhance the robustness and generalizability of the findings. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 350 KiB  
Article
The Effect of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Disclosure on the Profitability of Saudi-Listed Firms: Insights from Saudi Vision 2030
by Nadia Bushra Mohammed Ali, Hiba Awad Alla Ali Hussin, Howaida Mohammed Fadol Mohammed, Khaled Abd Alaziz Hassan Mohmmed, Amjad Abdullah S. Almutiri and Mohamed Ali Ali
Sustainability 2025, 17(7), 2977; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17072977 - 27 Mar 2025
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3450
Abstract
This study investigates the influence of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) disclosure on the profitability of Saudi-listed non-financial firms in the context of Saudi Vision 2030. The study uses a sample of 100 non-financial organizations from 2019 to 2023 (500 firm-year observations). This [...] Read more.
This study investigates the influence of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) disclosure on the profitability of Saudi-listed non-financial firms in the context of Saudi Vision 2030. The study uses a sample of 100 non-financial organizations from 2019 to 2023 (500 firm-year observations). This study uses panel data analysis and a random-effects regression model to examine the relationship between ESG disclosure and firm profitability as assessed by return on assets (ROA). To assess ESG disclosure, this study developed a comprehensive ESG disclosure index based on worldwide ESG guidelines and Saudi-related regulations. The regression results show a significantly positive relationship between ESG disclosure and firm profitability, emphasizing the financial benefits of corporate transparency and sustainability. This finding is consistent with the stakeholder theory, implying that firms with strong ESG commitments boost investor trust, improve risk management, and increase operational efficiency. Thus, this study adds to the ESG literature by presenting empirical evidence from Saudi Arabia, a growing country that is undergoing regulatory transition. Additionally, this study’s notable contribution is the development of a comprehensive ESG disclosure index tailored for the Saudi corporate landscape, integrating global reporting standards with local regulatory requirements. This index enhances the assessment of ESG transparency and offers a thorough tool for examining business sustainability strategies. The results offer substantial insights for policymakers, investors, and corporate leaders, emphasizing the significance of ESG in sustainable financial performance. Full article
Back to TopTop