Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (19)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = non-caloric artificial sweeteners

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
9 pages, 1470 KB  
Proceeding Paper
From Sweeteners to Sleeplessness: The Hidden Effects of Sucralose and Saccharin on the Gut–Brain Axis
by Anxo Carreira-Casais and Antia G. Pereira
Med. Sci. Forum 2026, 43(1), 1; https://doi.org/10.3390/msf2026043001 - 20 Jan 2026
Viewed by 330
Abstract
Sweetener consumption has increased considerably in recent decades, driven by the growing demand from consumers of low-calorie products for weight control and, especially, from diabetic patients who require safe sweetener alternatives without affecting their glucose levels. However, the latest scientific evidence seems to [...] Read more.
Sweetener consumption has increased considerably in recent decades, driven by the growing demand from consumers of low-calorie products for weight control and, especially, from diabetic patients who require safe sweetener alternatives without affecting their glucose levels. However, the latest scientific evidence seems to indicate that the continued consumption of various sweeteners could significantly alter the gut microbiota, triggering consequences that go beyond metabolic health and could affect sleep quality. Among the most used non-caloric sweeteners in the food industry are sucralose and saccharin. Several studies have shown that prolonged consumption of these sweeteners can significantly alter the composition of the gut microbiota. In particular, its consumption might lead to a decrease in beneficial bacteria such as Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, along with an increase in potentially pathogenic microorganisms such as Clostridium difficile and Escherichia coli. This dysbiosis creates a chronic low-grade inflammatory environment and contributes to the deterioration of glucose metabolism, factors that negatively impact the regulation of the gut–brain axis. Consequently, these alterations could interfere with the neuroendocrine mechanisms involved in sleep, promoting the development of disorders such as insomnia, sleep fragmentation, and decreased subjective sleep quality. The aim of this narrative review is to synthesize the current scientific evidence on the impact of artificial sweeteners on the gut microbiota and their potential involvement in sleep disorders. The underlying biological mechanisms will be analyzed and the clinical relevance of these interactions discussed, laying the groundwork for future research that will contribute to the development of dietary recommendations and therapeutic strategies aimed at modulating the microbiota to improve sleep health. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 2nd International Electronic Conference on Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 1659 KB  
Review
Disrupting the Gut–Brain Axis: How Artificial Sweeteners Rewire Microbiota and Reward Pathways
by Roberto Coccurello
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(20), 10220; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262010220 - 21 Oct 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 5800
Abstract
Artificial sweeteners, or non-caloric sweeteners (NCSs), are widely consumed as sugar substitutes to reduce energy intake and manage obesity. Once considered inert, accumulating evidence now shows that NCSs interact with host physiology, altering gut microbiota composition and neural circuits that regulate feeding. This [...] Read more.
Artificial sweeteners, or non-caloric sweeteners (NCSs), are widely consumed as sugar substitutes to reduce energy intake and manage obesity. Once considered inert, accumulating evidence now shows that NCSs interact with host physiology, altering gut microbiota composition and neural circuits that regulate feeding. This review synthesizes current knowledge on how NCSs disrupt the gut–brain axis (GBA), with particular focus on microbiota-mediated effects and neural reward processing. In homeostatic regulation, NCS-induced dysbiosis reduces beneficial taxa such as Akkermansia muciniphila and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, diminishes short-chain fatty acid production, impairs gut barrier integrity, and promotes systemic inflammation. These changes blunt satiety signaling and favor appetite-promoting pathways. Beyond homeostasis, NCSs also rewire hedonic circuits: unlike caloric sugars, which couple sweet taste with caloric reinforcement to robustly activate dopaminergic and hypothalamic pathways, NCSs provide sensory sweetness without energy, weakening reward prediction error signaling and altering neuropeptidergic modulation by orexin, neurotensin, and oxytocin. Microbial disruption further exacerbates dopaminergic instability by reducing precursors and metabolites critical for reward regulation. Together, these top-down (neural) and bottom-up (microbial) mechanisms converge to foster maladaptive food seeking, metabolic dysregulation, and increased vulnerability to overeating. Identifying whether microbiome-targeted interventions can counteract these effects is a key research priority for mitigating the impact of NCSs on human health. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Research of Gut Microbiota in Human Health and Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 590 KB  
Systematic Review
Impact of Artificial Sweeteners on Inflammation Markers: A Systematic Review of Animal Studies
by Pauline Celine Raoul, Maurizio Romano, Francesca Sofia Galli, Marco Cintoni, Esmeralda Capristo, Vincenzina Mora, Maria Cristina Mele, Antonio Gasbarrini and Emanuele Rinninella
Nutrients 2025, 17(20), 3251; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17203251 - 16 Oct 2025
Viewed by 5124
Abstract
Background: Artificial sweeteners, widely used as non-nutritive sugar substitutes, are increasingly prevalent in ultra-processed products. Although promoted for weight management due to their minimal caloric content, their impact on systemic inflammation remains uncertain. This systematic review of animal studies aims to evaluate the [...] Read more.
Background: Artificial sweeteners, widely used as non-nutritive sugar substitutes, are increasingly prevalent in ultra-processed products. Although promoted for weight management due to their minimal caloric content, their impact on systemic inflammation remains uncertain. This systematic review of animal studies aims to evaluate the association between artificial sweetener consumption and inflammatory biomarkers. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted up to May 2025 across PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus, following PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251084004). Risk of bias was assessed using the ARRIVE guidelines and SCYRCLE’s risk of bias tool. Results: Thirty-seven animal studies were included: aspartame (n = 17), sucralose (n = 16), acesulfame potassium (n = 5), and saccharin (n = 4). Protocols varied in terms of dosage, exposure duration, animal models, and assessment of inflammatory outcomes, including C-reactive protein, interleukins (IL-6 and IL-1β), and tumor necrosis factor alpha. Aspartame and sucralose could elevate inflammatory markers, with sucralose also disrupting gut integrity and microbiota. Acesulfame K and saccharin showed variable, dose-dependent effects. Conclusions: This systematic review of animal studies suggests a possible mechanistic association between the consumption of certain artificial sweeteners and systemic inflammation. However, this relationship remains to be clarified and warrants exploration through well-designed, large-scale randomized controlled trials. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hot Topics in Clinical Nutrition (3rd Edition))
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 506 KB  
Review
Monk Fruit Extract and Sustainable Health: A PRISMA-Guided Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
by Urszula Kaim and Karolina Labus
Nutrients 2025, 17(9), 1433; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17091433 - 24 Apr 2025
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 13437
Abstract
Sustainable health approaches promote functional food alternatives that support metabolic well-being while reducing reliance on added sugars and artificial sweeteners. Monk fruit extract (MFE), a natural, non-caloric sweetener, is gaining interest for its potential metabolic benefits, but its effects and regulatory status require [...] Read more.
Sustainable health approaches promote functional food alternatives that support metabolic well-being while reducing reliance on added sugars and artificial sweeteners. Monk fruit extract (MFE), a natural, non-caloric sweetener, is gaining interest for its potential metabolic benefits, but its effects and regulatory status require further evaluation. Objective: This PRISMA-guided systematic review synthesizes findings from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the impact of MFE on metabolic health, lipid profiles, inflammation, and regulatory considerations. Methods: The literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, covering studies published between 2015 and 2025. Inclusion criteria were human RCTs evaluating MFE’s metabolic effects, while animal studies, reviews, and mixed-intervention trials were excluded. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and the Jadad scale. Results: Five randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria, demonstrating that monk fruit extract (MFE) reduces postprandial glucose levels by 10–18% and insulin responses by 12–22%. No severe adverse effects were observed. Regulatory analysis indicated that MFE is approved for use in the United States and China, while its status remains under review in the European Union. Conclusions: MFE shows potential as a functional food ingredient for metabolic health. However, long-term clinical trials and a harmonized regulatory framework must confirm its safety and efficacy within sustainable health strategies Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Functional Foods and Sustainable Health (2nd Edition))
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

20 pages, 3056 KB  
Review
Artificial Sweeteners: A Double-Edged Sword for Gut Microbiome
by Helal F. Hetta, Nizar Sirag, Hassabelrasoul Elfadil, Ayman Salama, Sara F. Aljadrawi, Amani J. Alfaifi, Asma N. Alwabisi, Bothinah M. AbuAlhasan, Layan S. Alanazi, Yara A. Aljohani, Yasmin N. Ramadan, Noura H. Abd Ellah and Abdelazeem M. Algammal
Diseases 2025, 13(4), 115; https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases13040115 - 15 Apr 2025
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 24520
Abstract
Background and Aim: The human gut microbiome plays a crucial role in maintaining health. Artificial sweeteners, also known as non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS), have garnered attention for their potential to disrupt the balance of the gut microbiome. This review explores the complex relationship [...] Read more.
Background and Aim: The human gut microbiome plays a crucial role in maintaining health. Artificial sweeteners, also known as non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS), have garnered attention for their potential to disrupt the balance of the gut microbiome. This review explores the complex relationship between NNS and the gut microbiome, highlighting their potential benefits and risks. By synthesizing current evidence, we aim to provide a balanced perspective on the role of AS in dietary practices and health outcomes, emphasizing the need for targeted research to guide their safe and effective use. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted through searches in PubMed and Google Scholar, focusing on the effects of artificial sweeteners on gut microbiota. The search utilized key terms including “Gut Microbiome”, “gut microbiota”, “Eubiosis”, “Dysbiosis”, “Artificial Sweeteners”, and “Nonnutritive Sweeteners”. Results: NNS may alter the gut microbiome, but findings remain inconsistent. Animal studies often report a decrease in beneficial bacteria like Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus, and an increase in harmful strains such as Clostridium difficile and E. coli, potentially leading to inflammation and gut imbalance. Disruptions in short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) production and gut hormone signaling have also been observed. However, human studies generally show milder or no significant changes, highlighting the limitations in translating animal model findings directly to humans. Differences in study design, dosage, exposure time, and sweetener type likely contribute to these varied outcomes. Conclusions: While NNS offer certain benefits, including reduced caloric intake and improved blood sugar regulation, their impact on gut microbiome health raises important concerns. The observed reduction in beneficial bacteria and the rise in pathogenic strains underscore the need for caution in NNS consumption. Furthermore, the disruption of SCFA production and metabolic pathways illustrates the intricate relationship between diet and gut health. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microbiota in Human Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 3004 KB  
Review
Non/Low-Caloric Artificial Sweeteners and Gut Microbiome: From Perturbed Species to Mechanisms
by Jiahao Feng, Jingya Peng, Yun-Chung Hsiao, Chih-Wei Liu, Yifei Yang, Haoduo Zhao, Taylor Teitelbaum, Xueying Wang and Kun Lu
Metabolites 2024, 14(10), 544; https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo14100544 - 11 Oct 2024
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 15693
Abstract
Background: Non/low-caloric artificial sweeteners (NAS) are recognized as chemical additives substituting sugars to avoid caloric intake and subsequent sugar-derived diseases such as diabetes and hyperglycemia. Six NAS have been claimed safe and are authorized by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for [...] Read more.
Background: Non/low-caloric artificial sweeteners (NAS) are recognized as chemical additives substituting sugars to avoid caloric intake and subsequent sugar-derived diseases such as diabetes and hyperglycemia. Six NAS have been claimed safe and are authorized by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for public use, with acceptable daily intake information available: aspartame, acesulfame-K, saccharin, sucralose, neotame, and advantame. However, the impacts of NAS on the gut microbiome have raised potential concerns, since sporadic research revealed NAS-induced microbial changes in the gastrointestinal tracts and alterations in the microbiome–host interactive metabolism. Methods: Given the fact that the gut microbiome influences kaleidoscopic physiological functions in host health, this review aimed to decipher the impacts of NAS on the gut microbiome by implementing a comprehensive two-stage literature analysis based on each NAS. Results: This review documented disturbed microbiomes due to NAS exposure to a maximal resolution of species level using taxonomic clustering analysis, and recorded metabolism alterations involved in gut microbiome–host interactions. Conclusions: The results elucidated that specific NAS exhibited discrepant impacts on the gut microbiome, even though overlapping on the genera and species were identified. Some NAS caused glucose tolerance impairment in the host, but the key metabolites and their underlying mechanisms were different. Furthermore, this review embodied the challenges and future directions of current NAS–gut microbiome research to inspire advanced examination of the NAS exposure–gut microbiome–host metabolism axis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Effects of Environmental Exposure on Host and Microbial Metabolism)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

14 pages, 1748 KB  
Article
Intake of Artificial Sweeteners through Soft Drinks in the Preschool- and School-Aged Population
by Branka Jurcevic Zidar, Sanja Luetic, Katarina Jurcic, Zlatka Knezovic and Davorka Sutlovic
Nutrients 2024, 16(14), 2278; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16142278 - 15 Jul 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3155
Abstract
One of the main public health issues that has recently been observed in a greater number of children is being overweight. The cause certainly lies in the decreasing physical activity of children, but mostly in their eating habits. Soft drinks are recognized as [...] Read more.
One of the main public health issues that has recently been observed in a greater number of children is being overweight. The cause certainly lies in the decreasing physical activity of children, but mostly in their eating habits. Soft drinks are recognized as the most significant contributor to body overweight due to high sugar content; thus, as a result of numerous campaigns, part of the sugar is replaced by artificial sweeteners (ASs). Despite their advantage due to their low caloric value, WHO recommends that they should not be used to achieve weight control or as prevention for reducing the risk of non-communicable diseases, as there is no evidence of their effectiveness. Apart from beverages, artificial sweetener combinations are also added to a variety of “low fat” and “high protein” food products, which are highly favored especially among the young population. Therefore, it is necessary to take care of the cumulative intake. The conducted study included a survey of 323 parents of children aged 1–14 years, as well as an analysis of the AS content in the products most often consumed by the respondents. The results of the survey show that a large part of children (40%) aged 3–14 often consume soft drinks. Different products (soft drinks, juices/nectars, syrups) were sampled based on the respondents’ responses, and an analysis showed that 54% of them contained one or more ASs. In addition, the survey indicated parents’ lack of information about the presence of AS in products, as 51% of parents declared that they do not read the declarations of the products they buy. It is necessary to persist in consumer education and changes in dietary preferences and habits, especially among children. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Nutrition and Public Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1648 KB  
Review
Sucralose: From Sweet Success to Metabolic Controversies—Unraveling the Global Health Implications of a Pervasive Non-Caloric Artificial Sweetener
by José Alfredo Aguayo-Guerrero, Lucía Angélica Méndez-García, Helena Solleiro-Villavicencio, Rebeca Viurcos-Sanabria and Galileo Escobedo
Life 2024, 14(3), 323; https://doi.org/10.3390/life14030323 - 29 Feb 2024
Cited by 20 | Viewed by 36774
Abstract
Sucralose is a food additive initially used to mitigate glycemic peaks and calorie intake in patients with diabetes and obesity. Although sucralose has been considered safe for human consumption, the World Health Organization (WHO) issued a global alert in 2023 concerning the potential [...] Read more.
Sucralose is a food additive initially used to mitigate glycemic peaks and calorie intake in patients with diabetes and obesity. Although sucralose has been considered safe for human consumption, the World Health Organization (WHO) issued a global alert in 2023 concerning the potential health implications of this artificial sweetener. This review aims to comprehensively explore the effects of sucralose intake on human health by understanding sucralose absorption, metabolism, and excretion. We also outline the role of the sweet taste 1 receptor 3 (T1R3) in mediating sucralose-dependent signaling pathways that regulate satiety, incretin release, and insulin response. Finally, we discuss the impact of sucralose on microbiome dysbiosis, inflammatory response origin, liver damage, and toxicity. Gaining a deeper understanding of the manifold effects of sucralose on human physiology will help promote further studies to ensure its consumption is deemed safe for a broader population, including children, adolescents, and pregnant women. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Physiology and Pathology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 743 KB  
Article
Sugar-Sweetened Beverages and Artificially Sweetened Beverages Consumption and the Risk of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver (NAFLD) and Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)
by Tung-Sung Tseng, Wei-Ting Lin, Peng-Sheng Ting, Chiung-Kuei Huang, Po-Hung Chen, Gabrielle V. Gonzalez and Hui-Yi Lin
Nutrients 2023, 15(18), 3997; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15183997 - 15 Sep 2023
Cited by 23 | Viewed by 11430
Abstract
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) are fast becoming the most common chronic liver disease and are often preventable with healthy dietary habits and weight management. Sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption is associated with obesity and NAFLD. However, the impact of [...] Read more.
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) are fast becoming the most common chronic liver disease and are often preventable with healthy dietary habits and weight management. Sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption is associated with obesity and NAFLD. However, the impact of different types of SSBs, including artificially sweetened beverages (ASBs), is not clear after controlling for total sugar intake and total caloric intake. The aim of this study was to examine the association between the consumption of different SSBs and the risk of NAFLD and NASH in US adults. The representativeness of 3739 US adults aged ≥20 years old who had completed 24 h dietary recall interviews and measurements, including dietary, SSBs, smoking, physical activity, and liver stiffness measurements, were selected from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2017–2020 surveys. Chi-square tests, t-tests, and weighted logistic regression models were utilized for analyses. The prevalence of NASH was 20.5%, and that of NAFLD (defined without NASH) was 32.7% of US. adults. We observed a higher prevalence of NASH/NAFLD in men, Mexican-Americans, individuals with sugar intake from SSBs, light–moderate alcohol use, lower physical activity levels, higher energy intake, obesity, and medical comorbidities. Heavy sugar consumption through SSBs was significantly associated with NAFLD (aOR = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.05–2.45). In addition, the intake of ASBs only (compared to the non-SSB category) was significantly associated with NAFLD (aOR = 1.78, 95% CI = 1.04–3.05), after adjusting for demographic, risk behaviors, and body mass index. A higher sugar intake from SSBs and exclusive ASB intake are both associated with the risk of NAFLD. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Carbohydrates)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 732 KB  
Article
The Effect of Steviol Glycosides on Sensory Properties and Acceptability of Ice Cream
by Nannapas Muenprasitivej, Ran Tao, Sarah Jeanne Nardone and Sungeun Cho
Foods 2022, 11(12), 1745; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11121745 - 14 Jun 2022
Cited by 28 | Viewed by 8291
Abstract
There has been a challenge in overcoming the bitter aftertaste of stevia, a natural non-caloric sweetener. Recent research focuses on investigating various types of steviol glycosides, the sweet compounds in stevia leaves, as they exhibit different sensory characteristics. This study determined the sensory [...] Read more.
There has been a challenge in overcoming the bitter aftertaste of stevia, a natural non-caloric sweetener. Recent research focuses on investigating various types of steviol glycosides, the sweet compounds in stevia leaves, as they exhibit different sensory characteristics. This study determined the sensory properties and acceptability of ice cream sweetened solely with three steviol glycosides, rebaudioside (Reb) A, D, and M (0.09% w/v), using sucrose-sweetened ice cream as a control (14% w/v). Ice cream consumers (n = 92) rated their overall liking, attribute liking, and sweetness and bitterness intensities and described the aftertastes of each sample using check-all-that-apply. The liking scores of Reb D- and M-sweetened ice creams were significantly higher than those of Reb A-sweetened ice cream. Among the three glycosides, only Reb M showed a sweetness intensity comparable with that of sucrose. Consumers perceived the aftertastes of Reb D and M ice creams as being more sweet, pleasant, creamy, and milky, while Reb A was more artificial and chemical. Reb D and M ice creams were also plotted close to sucrose in the correspondence analysis graph, meaning that their aftertaste characteristics were similar to those of sucrose. The present study clearly highlights that Reb D and M have better tastes and provide better perceptions to consumers than Reb A, which is the most widely used glycoside in food industry. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Sensory and Consumer Sciences)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 800 KB  
Article
Potential Effects of Sucralose and Saccharin on Gut Microbiota: A Review
by Susana del Pozo, Sonia Gómez-Martínez, Ligia E. Díaz, Esther Nova, Rafael Urrialde and Ascensión Marcos
Nutrients 2022, 14(8), 1682; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14081682 - 18 Apr 2022
Cited by 57 | Viewed by 26852
Abstract
Artificial sweeteners are additives widely used in our diet. Although there is no consensus, current evidence indicates that sucralose and saccharin could influence the gut microbiota. The aim of this study was to analyze the existing scientific evidence on the effects of saccharin [...] Read more.
Artificial sweeteners are additives widely used in our diet. Although there is no consensus, current evidence indicates that sucralose and saccharin could influence the gut microbiota. The aim of this study was to analyze the existing scientific evidence on the effects of saccharin and sucralose consumption on gut microbiota in humans. Different databases were used with the following search terms: sweeteners, non-caloric-sweeteners, sucralose, splenda, saccharin, sugartwin, sweet’n low, microbiota, gut microbiota, humans, animal model, mice, rats, and/or in vitro studies. In vitro and animal model studies indicate a dose-dependent relationship between the intake of both sweeteners and gut microbiota affecting both diversity and composition. In humans, long-term study suggests the existence of a positive correlation between sweetener consumption and some bacterial groups; however, most short-term interventions with saccharin and sucralose, in amounts below the ADI, found no significant effect on those groups, but there seems to be a different basal microbiota-dependent response of metabolic markers. Although studies in vitro and in animal models seem to relate saccharin and sucralose consumption to changes in the gut microbiota, more long-term studies are needed in humans considering the basal microbiota of participants and their dietary and lifestyle habits in all population groups. Toxicological and basal gut microbiota effects must be included as relevant factors to evaluate food safety and nutritional consequences of non-calorie sweeteners. In humans, doses, duration of interventions, and number of subjects included in the studies are key factors to interpret the results. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

17 pages, 3589 KB  
Article
Process Simulation and Techno-Economic Analysis of Large-Scale Bioproduction of Sweet Protein Thaumatin II
by Kirolos D. Kelada, Daniel Tusé, Yuri Gleba, Karen A. McDonald and Somen Nandi
Foods 2021, 10(4), 838; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10040838 - 12 Apr 2021
Cited by 26 | Viewed by 9011
Abstract
There are currently worldwide efforts to reduce sugar intake due to the various adverse health effects linked with the overconsumption of sugars. Artificial sweeteners have been used as an alternative to nutritive sugars in numerous applications; however, their long-term effects on human health [...] Read more.
There are currently worldwide efforts to reduce sugar intake due to the various adverse health effects linked with the overconsumption of sugars. Artificial sweeteners have been used as an alternative to nutritive sugars in numerous applications; however, their long-term effects on human health remain controversial. This led to a shift in consumer preference towards non-caloric sweeteners from natural sources. Thaumatins are a class of intensely sweet proteins found in arils of the fruits of the West-African plant Thaumatococcus daniellii. Thaumatins’ current production method through aqueous extraction from this plant and uncertainty of the harvest from tropical rainforests limits its supply while the demand is increasing. Despite successful recombinant expression of the protein in several organisms, no large-scale bioproduction facilities exist. We present preliminary process design, process simulation, and economic analysis for a large-scale (50 metric tons/year) production of a thaumatin II variant using several different molecular farming platforms. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 3581 KB  
Article
Nutritional, Antioxidant, Antimicrobial, and Toxicological Profile of Two Innovative Types of Vegan, Sugar-Free Chocolate
by Delia Dumbrava, Liviana Alexandra Popescu, Codruța Marinela Soica, Alma Nicolin, Ileana Cocan, Monica Negrea, Ersilia Alexa, Diana Obistioiu, Isidora Radulov, Sofia Popescu, Claudia Watz, Roxana Ghiulai, Alexandra Mioc, Camelia Szuhanek, Cosmin Sinescu and Cristina Dehelean
Foods 2020, 9(12), 1844; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9121844 - 11 Dec 2020
Cited by 21 | Viewed by 6509
Abstract
Increased sugar consumption and unhealthy dietary patterns are key drivers of many preventable diseases that result in disability and death worldwide. However, health awareness has increased over the past decades creating a massive on-going demand for new low/non-caloric natural sweeteners that have a [...] Read more.
Increased sugar consumption and unhealthy dietary patterns are key drivers of many preventable diseases that result in disability and death worldwide. However, health awareness has increased over the past decades creating a massive on-going demand for new low/non-caloric natural sweeteners that have a high potential and are safer for consumption than artificial ones. The current study aims to investigate the nutritional properties, in vitro toxicological profile, total/individual polyphenols content, and the antioxidant, anti-cariogenic, and antimicrobial activity of two newly obtained vegan and sugar-free chocolate (VHC1 and VHC2). The energy values for the two finished products were very similar, 408.04 kcal/100 g for VHC1 and 404.68 kcal/100 g for VHC2. Both products, VHC1 and VHC2 present strong antioxidant activities, whereas antimicrobial results show an increased activity for VHC1 compared to VHC2, because of a higher phenolic content. In vitro toxicological evaluation revealed that both samples present a safe toxicological profile, while VHC2 increased cellular turnover of dermal cell lines, highlighting its potential use in skin treatments. The current work underlines the potential use of these vegetal mixtures as sugar-free substitutes for conventional products, as nutraceuticals, as well as topic application in skin care due to antimicrobial and antioxidant effects. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Food Quality and Safety)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

16 pages, 3540 KB  
Article
Saccharin Supplementation Inhibits Bacterial Growth and Reduces Experimental Colitis in Mice
by Annika Sünderhauf, René Pagel, Axel Künstner, Anika E. Wagner, Jan Rupp, Saleh M. Ibrahim, Stefanie Derer and Christian Sina
Nutrients 2020, 12(4), 1122; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12041122 - 17 Apr 2020
Cited by 26 | Viewed by 7009
Abstract
Non-caloric artificial sweeteners are frequently discussed as components of the “Western diet”, negatively modulating intestinal homeostasis. Since the artificial sweetener saccharin is known to depict bacteriostatic and microbiome-modulating properties, we hypothesized oral saccharin intake to influence intestinal inflammation and aimed at delineating its [...] Read more.
Non-caloric artificial sweeteners are frequently discussed as components of the “Western diet”, negatively modulating intestinal homeostasis. Since the artificial sweetener saccharin is known to depict bacteriostatic and microbiome-modulating properties, we hypothesized oral saccharin intake to influence intestinal inflammation and aimed at delineating its effect on acute and chronic colitis activity in mice. In vitro, different bacterial strains were grown in the presence or absence of saccharin. Mice were supplemented with saccharin before or after induction of acute or chronic colitis using dextran sodium sulfate (DSS) and the extent of colitis was assessed. Ex vivo, intestinal inflammation, fecal bacterial load and composition were studied by immunohistochemistry analyses, quantitative PCR, 16 S RNA PCR or next generation sequencing in samples collected from analyzed mice. In vitro, saccharin inhibited bacterial growth in a species-dependent manner. In vivo, oral saccharin intake reduced fecal bacterial load and altered microbiome composition, while the intestinal barrier was not obviously affected. Of note, DSS-induced colitis activity was significantly improved in mice after therapeutic or prophylactic treatment with saccharin. Together, this study demonstrates that oral saccharin intake decreases intestinal bacteria count and hence encompasses the capacity to reduce acute and chronic colitis activity in mice. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Nutrition and Metabolism)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1515 KB  
Article
Anthocyanin Metabolites in Human Urine after the Intake of New Functional Beverages
by Vicente Agulló, Débora Villaño, Cristina García-Viguera and Raúl Domínguez-Perles
Molecules 2020, 25(2), 371; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25020371 - 16 Jan 2020
Cited by 33 | Viewed by 5010
Abstract
Sugar intake abuse is directly related with the increase of metabolic diseases such as type 2 diabetes, obesity, and insulin resistance. Along this line, the development of new beverages using alternative sweeteners could help with combatting the pathophysiological disorders associated to the consumption [...] Read more.
Sugar intake abuse is directly related with the increase of metabolic diseases such as type 2 diabetes, obesity, and insulin resistance. Along this line, the development of new beverages using alternative sweeteners could help with combatting the pathophysiological disorders associated to the consumption of sugar. To provide evidence on this issue, in the present work, the bioavailability of anthocyanins was evaluated after the acute ingestion of a new maqui-citrus-based functional beverage rich in polyphenols, and supplemented with a range of sweeteners including sucrose (natural high caloric), stevia (natural non-caloric), and sucralose (artificial non-caloric), as an approach that would allow reducing the intake of sugars while providing bioactive phenolic compounds (anthocyanins). This approach allowed the evaluation of the maximum absorption and the diversity of metabolites excreted through urine. The beverages created were ingested by volunteers (n = 20) and the resulting anthocyanin metabolites in their urine were analyzed by UHPLC-ESI-MS/MS. A total of 29 degradation metabolites were detected: Caffeic acid, catechol, 3,4-dihidroxifenilacetic acid, hippuric acid, trans-ferulic acid, 2,4,6-trihydroxybenzaldehyde, trans-isoferulic acid, and vanillic acid derivatives, where peak concentrations were attained at 3.5 h after beverage intake. Sucralose was the sweetener that provided a higher bioavailability for most compounds, followed by stevia. Sucrose did not provide a remarkably higher bioavailability of any compounds in comparison with sucralose or stevia. The results propose two sweetener alternatives (sucralose and stevia) to sucrose, an overused high calorie sweetener that promotes some metabolic diseases. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop