Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (16)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = minibeam radiation therapy

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
16 pages, 3129 KB  
Article
Design and Optimization of X-Ray Collimators for Preclinical Minibeam Radiation Therapy
by Umberto Crimaldi, Nastassja Luongo, Laura Antonia Cerbone, Roberto Pacelli, Paolo Russo and Giovanni Mettivier
Appl. Sci. 2026, 16(7), 3282; https://doi.org/10.3390/app16073282 - 28 Mar 2026
Viewed by 468
Abstract
Spatially fractionated radiotherapy with X-ray minibeams (x-MBRT) aims to increase normal-tissue tolerance by delivering alternating high- and low-dose regions. We provide a Monte Carlo-based framework to design and optimize multi-slit collimators, quantifying how geometry and material govern peak–valley modulation. A validated digital twin [...] Read more.
Spatially fractionated radiotherapy with X-ray minibeams (x-MBRT) aims to increase normal-tissue tolerance by delivering alternating high- and low-dose regions. We provide a Monte Carlo-based framework to design and optimize multi-slit collimators, quantifying how geometry and material govern peak–valley modulation. A validated digital twin of the SmART X-RAD225Cx irradiator was implemented in TOPAS/Geant4. Various x-MBRT collimators were simulated with parallel or divergent slits. The parameter space covered a slit width w (0.1–0.9 mm), center-to-center spacing CTC (1–3 mm), thickness T (1–5 mm), and acceptance angle θ. Dose was scored in a 2 × 2 × 2 cm3 water phantom at a 1 cm depth. For fixed w/CTC, peak-valley dose ratio PVDR increases with larger CTC via an increase in peak dose, with the valley dose nearly constant. Peak transmission saturated at θ ≈ 3°, indicating minimal benefit from larger acceptance. Divergent slits yielded flatter lateral profiles but higher valley doses than parallel slits, reducing PVDR around the central axis. This Monte Carlo study provides insights for optimizing collimator geometries in x-MBRT using small-animal irradiators, informing the design of more effective collimation systems to enhance treatment precision and normal-tissue sparing. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Technologies in Radiology: Diagnosis, Prediction and Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 2112 KB  
Article
Minibeam Spatially-Fractionated Radiation Therapy Is Superior to Uniform Dose Radiation Therapy for Abscopal Effect When Combined with PD-L1 Checkpoint Inhibitor Immunotherapy in a Dual Tumor Murine Mammary Carcinoma Model
by Judith N. Rivera, Keith Laemont, Artak Tovmasyan, Stefan Stryker, Kenneth Young, Theresa Charity, Gregory M. Palmer and Sha Chang
Radiation 2025, 5(1), 3; https://doi.org/10.3390/radiation5010003 - 2 Jan 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 4531
Abstract
Spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) has a long history of treating bulky and hypoxic tumors. Recent evidence suggests that, compared to conventional uniform dose radiation therapy, SFRT may utilize different mechanisms of tumor cell killing, potentially including bystander and immune-activating effects. The abscopal [...] Read more.
Spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) has a long history of treating bulky and hypoxic tumors. Recent evidence suggests that, compared to conventional uniform dose radiation therapy, SFRT may utilize different mechanisms of tumor cell killing, potentially including bystander and immune-activating effects. The abscopal effect in radiation therapy refers to the control or even elimination of distant untreated tumors following the treatment of a primary tumor with radiation, a process believed to be immune-mediated. Such effects have been shown to be enhanced by immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibition. In this manuscript, we explore the potential synergy of spatially fractionated radiation therapy, in the form of kV x-ray minibeam, combined with PD-L1 checkpoint inhibition in a murine mammary carcinoma model at conventional dose-rate. We found that minibeam of peak/valley doses of 50 Gy/3.7 Gy performed statistically equivalent but trending better than that of 100 Gy/7.4 Gy in its abscopal effect and so 50 Gy/3.7 Gy was selected for further studies. Our findings indicate that the abscopal effect is significantly greater in the minibeam plus anti-PD-L1 treated animals compared to those receiving uniform dose radiation therapy plus anti-PD-L1 (p = 0.04948). Immune cell profiling in the minibeam plus anti-PD-L1 group compared to uniform dose reveals a consistent trend towards greater immune cell infiltration in the primary tumor, as well as a higher percentage of CD8+ T cells, both systemically and at the abscopal tumor site. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 2333 KB  
Article
Superior Anti-Tumor Response After Microbeam and Minibeam Radiation Therapy in a Lung Cancer Mouse Model
by Narayani Subramanian, Aleksandra Čolić, Marina Santiago Franco, Jessica Stolz, Mabroor Ahmed, Sandra Bicher, Johanna Winter, Rainer Lindner, Susanne Raulefs, Stephanie E. Combs, Stefan Bartzsch and Thomas E. Schmid
Cancers 2025, 17(1), 114; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17010114 - 1 Jan 2025
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3316
Abstract
Objectives: The present study aimed to compare the tumor growth delay between conventional radiotherapy (CRT) and the spatially fractionated modalities of microbeam radiation therapy (MRT) and minibeam radiation therapy (MBRT). In addition, we also determined the influence of beam width and the peak-to-valley [...] Read more.
Objectives: The present study aimed to compare the tumor growth delay between conventional radiotherapy (CRT) and the spatially fractionated modalities of microbeam radiation therapy (MRT) and minibeam radiation therapy (MBRT). In addition, we also determined the influence of beam width and the peak-to-valley dose ratio (PVDR) on tumor regrowth. Methods: A549, a human non-small-cell lung cancer cell line, was implanted subcutaneously into the hind leg of female CD1-Foxn1nu mice. The animals were irradiated with sham, CRT, MRT, or MBRT. The spatially fractionated fields were created using two specially designed multislit collimators with a beam width of 50 μm and a center-to-center distance (CTC) of 400 μm for MRT and a beam width of 500 μm and 2000 μm CTC for MBRT. Additionally, the concept of the equivalent uniform dose (EUD) was chosen in our study. A dose of 20 Gy was applied to all groups with a PVDR of 20 for MBRT and MRT. Tumor growth was recorded until the tumors reached at least a volume that was at least three-fold of their initial value, and the growth delay was calculated. Results: We saw a significant reduction in tumor regrowth following all radiation modalities. A growth delay of 11.1 ± 8 days was observed for CRT compared to the sham, whereas MBRT showed a delay of 20.2 ± 7.3 days. The most pronounced delay was observed in mice irradiated with MRT PVDR 20, with 34.9 ± 26.3 days of delay. Conclusions: The current study highlights the fact that MRT and MBRT modalities show a significant tumor growth delay in comparison to CRT at equivalent uniform doses. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Research of Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 5418 KB  
Article
Challenges for the Implementation of Primary Standard Dosimetry in Proton Minibeam Radiation Therapy
by John Cotterill, Samuel Flynn, Russell Thomas, Anna Subiel, Nigel Lee, Michael Homer, Hugo Palmans, Ludovic De Marzi, Yolanda Prezado, David Shipley and Ana Lourenço
Cancers 2024, 16(23), 4013; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16234013 - 29 Nov 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1890
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Spatial fractionation of proton fields as sub-millimeter beamlets to treat cancer has shown better sparing of healthy tissue whilst maintaining the same tumor control. It is critical to ensure primary standard dosimetry is accurate and ready to support the modality’s clinical [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Spatial fractionation of proton fields as sub-millimeter beamlets to treat cancer has shown better sparing of healthy tissue whilst maintaining the same tumor control. It is critical to ensure primary standard dosimetry is accurate and ready to support the modality’s clinical implementation. Methods: This work provided a proof-of-concept, using the National Physical Laboratory’s Primary Standard Proton Calorimeter (PSPC) to measure average absorbed dose-to-water in a pMBRT field. A 100 MeV mono-energetic field and a 2 cm wide SOBP were produced with a spot-scanned proton beam incident on a collimator comprising 15 slits of 400 µm width, each 5 cm long and separated by a center-to-center distance of 4 mm. Results: The results showed the uncertainty on the absorbed dose-to-water in the mono-energetic beam was dominated by contributions of 1.4% and 1.1% (k = 1) for the NPL PSPC and PTW Roos chambers, respectively, originating from the achievable positioning accuracy of the devices. In comparison, the uncertainty due to positioning in the SOBP for both the NPL PSPC and PTW Roos chambers were 0.4%. Conclusions: These results highlight that it may be more accurate and reliable to perform reference dosimetry measuring the Dose-Area Product or in an SOBP for spatially fractionated fields. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Steps towards the Clinics in Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 4000 KB  
Article
Mini-Beam Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy for Whole-Brain Re-Irradiation—A Pilot Toxicity Study in a Healthy Mouse Model
by Hong Yuan, Judith N. Rivera, Jonathan E. Frank, Jonathan Nagel, Colette Shen and Sha X. Chang
Radiation 2024, 4(2), 125-141; https://doi.org/10.3390/radiation4020010 - 8 May 2024
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 4028
Abstract
For patients with recurrent brain metastases, there is an urgent need for a more effective and less toxic treatment approach. Accumulating evidence has shown that spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) is able to provide a significantly higher therapeutic ratio with lower toxicity compared [...] Read more.
For patients with recurrent brain metastases, there is an urgent need for a more effective and less toxic treatment approach. Accumulating evidence has shown that spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) is able to provide a significantly higher therapeutic ratio with lower toxicity compared to conventional radiation using a uniform dose. The purpose of this study was to explore the potential low toxicity benefit of mini-beam radiotherapy (MBRT), a form of SFRT, for whole-brain re-irradiation in a healthy mouse model. Animals first received an initial 25 Gy of uniform whole-brain irradiation. Five weeks later, they were randomized into three groups to receive three different re-irradiation treatments as follows: (1) uniform irradiation at 25 Gy; (2) MBRT at a 25 Gy volume-averaged dose (106.1/8.8 Gy for peak/valley dose, 25 Gy-MBRT); and (3) MBRT at a 43 Gy volume-averaged dose (182.5/15.1 Gy for peak/valley dose, 43 Gy-MBRT). Animal survival and changes in body weight were monitored for signs of toxicity. Brains were harvested at 5 weeks after re-irradiation for histologic evaluation and immunostaining. The study showed that 25 Gy-MBRT resulted in significantly less body weight loss than 25 Gy uniform irradiation in whole-brain re-irradiation. Mice in the 25 Gy-MBRT group had a higher level of CD11b-stained microglia but also maintained more Ki67-stained proliferative progenitor cells in the brain compared to mice in the uniform irradiation group. However, the high-dose 43 Gy-MBRT group showed severe radiation toxicity compared to the low-dose 25 Gy-MBRT and uniform irradiation groups, indicating dose-dependent toxicity. Our study demonstrates that MBRT at an appropriate dose level has the potential to provide less toxic whole-brain re-irradiation. Future studies investigating the use of MBRT for brain metastases are warranted. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Innovative Radiation Therapies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 3094 KB  
Article
Influence of the Hypersensitivity to Low Dose Phenomenon on the Tumor Response to Hypofractionated Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
by Eymeric Le Reun, Adeline Granzotto, Adeline Pêtre, Larry Bodgi, Guillaume Beldjoudi, Thomas Lacornerie, Véronique Vallet, Audrey Bouchet, Joëlle Al-Choboq, Michel Bourguignon, Juliette Thariat, Jean Bourhis, Eric Lartigau and Nicolas Foray
Cancers 2023, 15(15), 3979; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15153979 - 5 Aug 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2730
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has made the hypofractionation of high doses delivered in a few sessions more acceptable. While the benefits of hypofractionated SBRT have been attributed to additional vascular, immune effects, or specific cell deaths, a radiobiological and mechanistic model is [...] Read more.
Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has made the hypofractionation of high doses delivered in a few sessions more acceptable. While the benefits of hypofractionated SBRT have been attributed to additional vascular, immune effects, or specific cell deaths, a radiobiological and mechanistic model is still needed. By considering each session of SBRT, the dose is divided into hundreds of minibeams delivering some fractions of Gy. In such a dose range, the hypersensitivity to low dose (HRS) phenomenon can occur. HRS produces a biological effect equivalent to that produced by a dose 5-to-10 times higher. To examine whether HRS could contribute to enhancing radiation effects under SBRT conditions, we exposed tumor cells of different HRS statuses to SBRT. Four human HRS-positive and two HRS-negative tumor cell lines were exposed to different dose delivery modes: a single dose of 0.2 Gy, 2 Gy, 10 × 0.2 Gy, and a single dose of 2 Gy using a non-coplanar isocentric minibeams irradiation mode were delivered. Anti-γH2AX immunofluorescence, assessing DNA double-strand breaks (DSB), was applied. In the HRS-positive cells, the DSB produced by 10 × 0.2 Gy and 2 Gy, delivered by tens of minibeams, appeared to be more severe, and they provided more highly damaged cells than in the HRS-negative cells, suggesting that more severe DSB are induced in the “SBRT modes” conditions when HRS occurs in tumor. Each SBRT session can be viewed as hyperfractionated dose delivery by means of hundreds of low dose minibeams. Under current SBRT conditions (i.e., low dose per minibeam and not using ultra-high dose-rate), the response of HRS-positive tumors to SBRT may be enhanced significantly. Interestingly, similar conclusions were reached with HRS-positive and HRS-negative untransformed fibroblast cell lines, suggesting that the HRS phenomenon may also impact the risk of post-RT tissue overreactions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 6745 KB  
Article
Orthovoltage X-ray Minibeam Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Ocular Tumours—An In Silico Evaluation
by Tim Schneider, Denis Malaise, Frédéric Pouzoulet and Yolanda Prezado
Cancers 2023, 15(3), 679; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15030679 - 21 Jan 2023
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 4306
Abstract
(1) Background: Radiotherapeutic treatments of ocular tumors are often challenging because of nearby radiosensitive structures and the high doses required to treat radioresistant cancers such as uveal melanomas. Although increased local control rates can be obtained with advanced techniques such as proton therapy [...] Read more.
(1) Background: Radiotherapeutic treatments of ocular tumors are often challenging because of nearby radiosensitive structures and the high doses required to treat radioresistant cancers such as uveal melanomas. Although increased local control rates can be obtained with advanced techniques such as proton therapy and stereotactic radiosurgery, these modalities are not always accessible to patients (due to high costs or low availability) and side effects in structures such as the lens, eyelids or anterior chamber remain an issue. Minibeam radiation therapy (MBRT) could represent a promising alternative in this regard. MBRT is an innovative new treatment approach where the irradiation field is composed of multiple sub-millimetric beamlets, spaced apart by a few millimetres. This creates a so-called spatial fractionation of the dose which, in small animal experiments, has been shown to increase normal tissue sparing while simultaneously providing high tumour control rates. Moreover, MBRT with orthovoltage X-rays could be easily implemented in widely available and comparably inexpensive irradiation platforms. (2) Methods: Monte Carlo simulations were performed using the TOPAS toolkit to evaluate orthovoltage X-ray MBRT as a potential alternative for treating ocular tumours. Dose distributions were simulated in CT images of a human head, considering six different irradiation configurations. (3) Results: The mean, peak and valley doses were assessed in a generic target region and in different organs at risk. The obtained doses were comparable to those reported in previous X-ray MBRT animal studies where good normal tissue sparing and tumour control (rat glioma models) were found. (4) Conclusions: A proof-of-concept study for the application of orthovoltage X-ray MBRT to ocular tumours was performed. The simulation results encourage the realisation of dedicated animal studies considering minibeam irradiations of the eye to specifically assess ocular and orbital toxicities as well as tumour response. If proven successful, orthovoltage X-ray minibeams could become a cost-effective treatment alternative, in particular for developing countries. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Innovative Radiation Therapies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2735 KB  
Article
Longitudinally Heterogeneous Tumor Dose Optimizes Proton Broadbeam, Interlaced Minibeam, and FLASH Therapy
by Matthias Sammer, Aikaterini Rousseti, Stefanie Girst, Judith Reindl and Günther Dollinger
Cancers 2022, 14(20), 5162; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14205162 - 21 Oct 2022
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 2754
Abstract
The prerequisite of any radiation therapy modality (X-ray, electron, proton, and heavy ion) is meant to meet at least a minimum prescribed dose at any location in the tumor for the best tumor control. In addition, there is also an upper dose limit [...] Read more.
The prerequisite of any radiation therapy modality (X-ray, electron, proton, and heavy ion) is meant to meet at least a minimum prescribed dose at any location in the tumor for the best tumor control. In addition, there is also an upper dose limit within the tumor according to the International Commission on Radiation Units (ICRU) recommendations in order to spare healthy tissue as well as possible. However, healthy tissue may profit from the lower side effects when waving this upper dose limit and allowing a larger heterogeneous dose deposition in the tumor, but maintaining the prescribed minimum dose level, particularly in proton minibeam therapy. Methods: Three different longitudinally heterogeneous proton irradiation modes and a standard spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) irradiation mode are simulated for their depth-dose curves under the constraint of maintaining a minimum prescribed dose anywhere in the tumor region. Symmetric dose distributions of two opposing directions are overlaid in a 25 cm-thick water phantom containing a 5 cm-thick tumor region. Interlaced planar minibeam dose distributions are compared to those of a broadbeam using the same longitudinal dose profiles. Results and Conclusion: All longitudinally heterogeneous proton irradiation modes show a dose reduction in the healthy tissue compared to the common SOBP mode in the case of broad proton beams. The proton minibeam cases show eventually a much larger mean cell survival and thus a further reduced equivalent uniform dose (EUD) in the healthy tissue than any broadbeam case. In fact, the irradiation mode using only one proton energy from each side shows better sparing capabilities in the healthy tissue than the common spread-out Bragg peak irradiation mode with the option of a better dose fall-off at the tumor edges and an easier technical realization, particularly in view of proton minibeam irradiation at ultra-high dose rates larger than ~10 Gy/s (so-called FLASH irradiation modes). Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Steps towards the Clinics in Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 3144 KB  
Article
Dose Profile Modulation of Proton Minibeam for Clinical Application
by Myeongsoo Kim, Ui-Jung Hwang, Kyeongyun Park, Dohyeon Kim, Hak Soo Kim, Sang Hyoun Choi, Jong Hwi Jeong, Dongho Shin, Se Byeong Lee, Joo-Young Kim, Tae Hyun Kim, Hye Jung Baek, Hojin Kim, Kihwan Kim, Sang Soo Kim and Young Kyung Lim
Cancers 2022, 14(12), 2888; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14122888 - 11 Jun 2022
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 3726
Abstract
The feasibility of proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) using a multislit collimator (MSC) and a scattering device was evaluated for clinical use at a clinical proton therapy facility. We fabricated, through Monte Carlo (MC) simulations, not only an MSC with a high peak-to-valley [...] Read more.
The feasibility of proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) using a multislit collimator (MSC) and a scattering device was evaluated for clinical use at a clinical proton therapy facility. We fabricated, through Monte Carlo (MC) simulations, not only an MSC with a high peak-to-valley dose ratio (PVDR) at the entrance of the proton beam, to prevent radiation toxicity, but also a scattering device to modulate the PVDR in depth. The slit width and center-to-center distance of the diverging MSC were 2.5 mm and 5.0 mm at the large end, respectively, and its thickness and available field size were 100 mm and 76 × 77.5 mm2, respectively. Spatially fractionated dose distributions were measured at various depths using radiochromic EBT3 films and also tested on bacterial cells. MC simulation showed that the thicker the MSC, the higher the PVDR at the phantom surface. Dosimetric evaluations showed that lateral dose profiles varied according to the scatterer’s thickness, and the depths satisfying PVDR = 1.1 moved toward the surface as their thickness increased. The response of the bacterial cells to the proton minibeams’ depth was also established, in a manner similar to the dosimetric pattern. Conclusively, these results strongly suggest that pMBRT can be implemented in clinical centers by using MSC and scatterers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Application of Proton Beam Therapy in Cancer Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 4947 KB  
Article
Planar Proton Minibeam Irradiation Elicits Spatially Confined DNA Damage in a Human Epidermis Model
by Harry Scherthan, Stephanie-Quinta Wagner, Jan Grundhöfer, Nicole Matejka, Jessica Müller, Steffen Müller, Sarah Rudigkeit, Matthias Sammer, Sarah Schoof, Matthias Port and Judith Reindl
Cancers 2022, 14(6), 1545; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14061545 - 17 Mar 2022
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 4129
Abstract
Purpose: High doses of ionizing radiation in radiotherapy can elicit undesirable side effects to the skin. Proton minibeam radiotherapy (pMBRT) may circumvent such limitations due to tissue-sparing effects observed at the macro scale. Here, we mapped DNA damage dynamics in a 3D [...] Read more.
Purpose: High doses of ionizing radiation in radiotherapy can elicit undesirable side effects to the skin. Proton minibeam radiotherapy (pMBRT) may circumvent such limitations due to tissue-sparing effects observed at the macro scale. Here, we mapped DNA damage dynamics in a 3D tissue context at the sub-cellular level. Methods: Epidermis models were irradiated with planar proton minibeams of 66 µm, 408 µm and 920 µm widths and inter-beam-distances of 2.5 mm at an average dose of 2 Gy using the scanning-ion-microscope SNAKE in Garching, GER. γ-H2AX + 53BP1 and cleaved-caspase-3 immunostaining revealed dsDNA damage and cell death, respectively, in time courses from 0.5 to 72 h after irradiation. Results: Focused 66 µm pMBRT induced sharply localized severe DNA damage (pan-γ-H2AX) in cells at the dose peaks, while damage in the dose valleys was similar to sham control. pMBRT with 408 µm and 920 µm minibeams induced DSB foci in all cells. At 72 h after irradiation, DNA damage had reached sham levels, indicating successful DNA repair. Increased frequencies of active-caspase-3 and pan-γ-H2AX-positive cells revealed incipient cell death at late time points. Conclusions: The spatially confined distribution of DNA damage appears to underlie the tissue-sparing effect after focused pMBRT. Thus, pMBRT may be the method of choice in radiotherapy to reduce side effects to the skin. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 2457 KB  
Article
Proton Minibeam Radiation Therapy and Arc Therapy: Proof of Concept of a Winning Alliance
by Ramon Ortiz, Ludovic De Marzi and Yolanda Prezado
Cancers 2022, 14(1), 116; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14010116 - 27 Dec 2021
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 4332
Abstract
(1) Background: Proton Arc Therapy and Proton Minibeam Radiation Therapy are two novel therapeutic approaches with the potential to lower the normal tissue complication probability, widening the therapeutic window for radioresistant tumors. While the benefits of both modalities have been individually evaluated, their [...] Read more.
(1) Background: Proton Arc Therapy and Proton Minibeam Radiation Therapy are two novel therapeutic approaches with the potential to lower the normal tissue complication probability, widening the therapeutic window for radioresistant tumors. While the benefits of both modalities have been individually evaluated, their combination and its potential advantages are being assessed in this proof-of-concept study for the first time. (2) Methods: Monte Carlo simulations were employed to evaluate the dose and LET distributions in brain tumor irradiations. (3) Results: a net reduction in the dose to normal tissues (up to 90%), and the preservation of the spatial fractionation of the dose were achieved for all configurations evaluated. Additionally, Proton Minibeam Arc Therapy (pMBAT) reduces the volumes exposed to high-dose and high-LET values at expense of increased low-dose and intermediate-LET values. (4) Conclusions: pMBAT enhances the individual benefits of proton minibeams while keeping those of conventional proton arc therapy. These results might facilitate the path towards patients’ treatments since lower peak doses in normal tissues would be needed than in the case of a single array of proton minibeams. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research in Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapies for Cancers)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

14 pages, 2327 KB  
Article
Converging Proton Minibeams with Magnetic Fields for Optimized Radiation Therapy: A Proof of Concept
by Marco Cavallone, Yolanda Prezado and Ludovic De Marzi
Cancers 2022, 14(1), 26; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14010026 - 22 Dec 2021
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 4240
Abstract
Proton MiniBeam Radiation Therapy (pMBRT) is a novel strategy that combines the benefits of minibeam radiation therapy with the more precise ballistics of protons to further optimize the dose distribution and reduce radiation side effects. The aim of this study is to investigate [...] Read more.
Proton MiniBeam Radiation Therapy (pMBRT) is a novel strategy that combines the benefits of minibeam radiation therapy with the more precise ballistics of protons to further optimize the dose distribution and reduce radiation side effects. The aim of this study is to investigate possible strategies to couple pMBRT with dipole magnetic fields to generate a converging minibeam pattern and increase the center-to-center distance between minibeams. Magnetic field optimization was performed so as to obtain the same transverse dose profile at the Bragg peak position as in a reference configuration with no magnetic field. Monte Carlo simulations reproducing realistic pencil beam scanning settings were used to compute the dose in a water phantom. We analyzed different minibeam generation techniques, such as the use of a static multislit collimator or a dynamic aperture, and different magnetic field positions, i.e., before or within the water phantom. The best results were obtained using a dynamic aperture coupled with a magnetic field within the water phantom. For a center-to-center distance increase from 4 mm to 6 mm, we obtained an increase of peak-to-valley dose ratio and decrease of valley dose above 50%. The results indicate that magnetic fields can be effectively used to improve the spatial modulation at shallow depth for enhanced healthy tissue sparing. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research in Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapies for Cancers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

30 pages, 7102 KB  
Article
A Multi-Scale and Multi-Technique Approach for the Characterization of the Effects of Spatially Fractionated X-ray Radiation Therapies in a Preclinical Model
by Mariele Romano, Alberto Bravin, Alberto Mittone, Alicia Eckhardt, Giacomo E. Barbone, Lucie Sancey, Julien Dinkel, Stefan Bartzsch, Jens Ricke, Marianna Alunni-Fabbroni, Heidrun Hirner-Eppeneder, Dmitry Karpov, Cinzia Giannini, Oliver Bunk, Audrey Bouchet, Viktoria Ruf, Armin Giese and Paola Coan
Cancers 2021, 13(19), 4953; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13194953 - 1 Oct 2021
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 4782
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to use a multi-technique approach to detect the effects of spatially fractionated X-ray Microbeam (MRT) and Minibeam Radiation Therapy (MB) and to compare them to seamless Broad Beam (BB) irradiation. Healthy- and Glioblastoma (GBM)-bearing male Fischer rats [...] Read more.
The purpose of this study is to use a multi-technique approach to detect the effects of spatially fractionated X-ray Microbeam (MRT) and Minibeam Radiation Therapy (MB) and to compare them to seamless Broad Beam (BB) irradiation. Healthy- and Glioblastoma (GBM)-bearing male Fischer rats were irradiated in-vivo on the right brain hemisphere with MRT, MB and BB delivering three different doses for each irradiation geometry. Brains were analyzed post mortem by multi-scale X-ray Phase Contrast Imaging–Computed Tomography (XPCI-CT), histology, immunohistochemistry, X-ray Fluorescence (XRF), Small- and Wide-Angle X-ray Scattering (SAXS/WAXS). XPCI-CT discriminates with high sensitivity the effects of MRT, MB and BB irradiations on both healthy and GBM-bearing brains producing a first-time 3D visualization and morphological analysis of the radio-induced lesions, MRT and MB induced tissue ablations, the presence of hyperdense deposits within specific areas of the brain and tumor evolution or regression with respect to the evaluation made few days post-irradiation with an in-vivo magnetic resonance imaging session. Histology, immunohistochemistry, SAXS/WAXS and XRF allowed identification and classification of these deposits as hydroxyapatite crystals with the coexistence of Ca, P and Fe mineralization, and the multi-technique approach enabled the realization, for the first time, of the map of the differential radiosensitivity of the different brain areas treated with MRT and MB. 3D XPCI-CT datasets enabled also the quantification of tumor volumes and Ca/Fe deposits and their full-organ visualization. The multi-scale and multi-technique approach enabled a detailed visualization and classification in 3D of the radio-induced effects on brain tissues bringing new essential information towards the clinical implementation of the MRT and MB radiation therapy techniques. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research in Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapies for Cancers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 18744 KB  
Article
First Evaluation of Temporal and Spatial Fractionation in Proton Minibeam Radiation Therapy of Glioma-Bearing Rats
by Annaïg Bertho, Ramon Ortiz, Marjorie Juchaux, Cristèle Gilbert, Charlotte Lamirault, Frederic Pouzoulet, Laura Polledo, Alethea Liens, Nils Warfving, Catherine Sebrie, Laurène Jourdain, Annalisa Patriarca, Ludovic de Marzi and Yolanda Prezado
Cancers 2021, 13(19), 4865; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13194865 - 28 Sep 2021
Cited by 51 | Viewed by 4342
Abstract
(1) Background: Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is a new radiotherapy technique using spatially modulated narrow proton beams. pMBRT results in a significantly reduced local tissue toxicity while maintaining or even increasing the tumor control efficacy as compared to conventional radiotherapy in small [...] Read more.
(1) Background: Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is a new radiotherapy technique using spatially modulated narrow proton beams. pMBRT results in a significantly reduced local tissue toxicity while maintaining or even increasing the tumor control efficacy as compared to conventional radiotherapy in small animal experiments. In all the experiments performed up to date in tumor bearing animals, the dose was delivered in one single fraction. This is the first assessment on the impact of a temporal fractionation scheme on the response of glioma-bearing animals to pMBRT. (2) Methods: glioma-bearing rats were irradiated with pMBRT using a crossfire geometry. The response of the irradiated animals in one and two fractions was compared. An additional group of animals was also treated with conventional broad beam irradiations. (3) Results: pMBRT delivered in two fractions at the biological equivalent dose corresponding to one fraction resulted in the highest median survival time, with 80% long-term survivors free of tumors. No increase in local toxicity was noted in this group with respect to the other pMBRT irradiated groups. Conventional broad beam irradiations resulted in the most severe local toxicity. (4) Conclusion: Temporal fractionation increases the therapeutic index in pMBRT and could ease the path towards clinical trials. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research in Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapies for Cancers)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

15 pages, 584 KB  
Article
Conceptual Design of a Novel Nozzle Combined with a Clinical Proton Linac for Magnetically Focussed Minibeams
by Tim Schneider, Annalisa Patriarca, Alberto Degiovanni, Manuel Gallas and Yolanda Prezado
Cancers 2021, 13(18), 4657; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13184657 - 16 Sep 2021
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 3298
Abstract
(1) Background: Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is a novel therapeutic approach with the potential to significantly increase normal tissue sparing while providing tumour control equivalent or superior to standard proton therapy. For reasons of efficiency, flexibility and minibeam quality, the optimal implementation [...] Read more.
(1) Background: Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is a novel therapeutic approach with the potential to significantly increase normal tissue sparing while providing tumour control equivalent or superior to standard proton therapy. For reasons of efficiency, flexibility and minibeam quality, the optimal implementation of pMBRT should use magnetically focussed minibeams which, however, could not yet be generated in a clinical environment. In this study, we evaluated our recently proposed minibeam nozzle together with a new clinical proton linac as a potential implementation. (2) Methods: Monte Carlo simulations were performed to determine under which conditions minibeams can be generated and to evaluate the robustness against focussing magnet errors. Moreover, an example of conventional pencil beam scanning irradiation was simulated. (3) Results: Excellent minibeam sizes between 0.6 and 0.9 mm full width at half maximum could be obtained and a good tolerance to errors was observed. Furthermore, the delivery of a 10 cm × 10 cm field with pencil beams was demonstrated. (4) Conclusion: The combination of the new proton linac and minibeam nozzle could represent an optimal implementation of pMBRT by allowing the generation of magnetically focussed minibeams with clinically relevant parameters. It could furthermore be used for conventional pencil beam scanning. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research in Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapies for Cancers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop