Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (20)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = lurbinectedin

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
22 pages, 5289 KB  
Article
The DNA Minor Groove Binders Trabectedin and Lurbinectedin Are Potent Antitumor Agents in Human Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
by Erwin Gäbele, Isabella Gigante, Mirella Pastore, Antonio Cigliano, Grazia Galleri, Thea Bauer, Elena Pizzuto, Serena Mancarella, Martina Müller, Fabio Marra, Heiko Siegmund, Gianluigi Giannelli, Matthias Evert, Chiara Raggi, Diego F. Calvisi and Sara M. Steinmann
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(18), 9085; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26189085 - 18 Sep 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2663
Abstract
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is the second most common primary liver tumor. Due to its aggressive nature and resistance to conventional treatments, there is a pressing need to develop novel and more effective therapies for this deadly malignancy. Here, we explored the therapeutic potential [...] Read more.
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is the second most common primary liver tumor. Due to its aggressive nature and resistance to conventional treatments, there is a pressing need to develop novel and more effective therapies for this deadly malignancy. Here, we explored the therapeutic potential of the DNA minor groove binders trabectedin (TRB) and lurbinectedin (LUR) for the treatment of iCCA using cell lines, spheroids, cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), patient-derived tumor organoids (PDOs), and the chicken chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) in vivo model. TRB and, more substantially, LUR, significantly inhibited cell growth in iCCA cell lines, spheroids, CAFs, and PDOs at very low nanomolar concentrations. Specifically, the two drugs significantly reduced proliferation, triggered apoptosis, and caused DNA damage in iCCA cells. At the metabolic level, TRB and LUR decreased mitochondrial respiration and glycolysis. At the molecular level, the two compounds effectively downregulated the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) and Hippo/YAP pathways and suppressed the expression of yes-associated protein 1 (YAP1), cellular myelocytomatosis oncogene (c-Myc), E2F transcription factor 1 (E2F1), Bromodomain-containing protein 4 (BRD4), TEA domain transcription factor 4 (TEAD4), and cluster of differentiation 7 (CD7) proto-oncogenes. Furthermore, LUR significantly restrained the in vivo growth of iCCA cells in the CAM model. Our data indicate that TRB and LUR possess strong anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic activities and could represent promising therapeutic agents for the treatment of iCCA. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Research on Cholangiocarcinoma: From Bench to Bedside)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

16 pages, 2203 KB  
Article
Therapeutic Effects of Lurbinectedin in PARP Inhibitor-Resistant High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Using Patient-Derived Cell Lines and Organoid Models
by Akshi Srivastava, Christine Unterweger, Sarah Guttmann, Andrea Wolf, Leonhard Müllauer, Martin Schepelmann, Dan Cacsire Castillo-Tong and Thomas Bartl
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(18), 8866; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26188866 - 11 Sep 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1425
Abstract
High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is an aggressive malignancy which is often treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and PARP inhibitors (PARPi). However, PARPi resistance remains a major clinical challenge, necessitating alternative therapeutic strategies. In this study, we establish the first known patient-derived organoid models [...] Read more.
High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is an aggressive malignancy which is often treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and PARP inhibitors (PARPi). However, PARPi resistance remains a major clinical challenge, necessitating alternative therapeutic strategies. In this study, we establish the first known patient-derived organoid models directly from PARPi-resistant HGSOC and demonstrate that they preserve the original tumor architecture and key biomarkers (EpCAM, CA125, PAX8, HER2, MEK1/2, Cyclin E1), thus providing unique preclinical models for drug testing. These organoids were used to evaluate lurbinectedin in comparison with standard carboplatin and paclitaxel. While lurbinectedin showed comparable apoptotic effects to paclitaxel and superior activity to carboplatin, it induced chromosomal breaks to different extents in different cell lines, suggesting a distinct mechanism of action. Importantly, this work does not advocate for lurbinectedin as a superior therapy but, rather, demonstrates the utility of organoid models in uncovering drug-specific genomic effects. Our findings underscore the critical need for expanded testing using clinically relevant models to identify more effective strategies against PARPi-resistant disease. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 4173 KB  
Article
The Effect of Lurbinectedin as a Monotherapy and in Combination with Ionizing Radiation on Sarcoma Cell Lines
by Hannah Alsheimer, Paula Schiller, Sabine Semrau, Felix Grabenbauer, Rainer Fietkau, Luitpold V. Distel and Laura S. Hildebrand
Cancers 2025, 17(17), 2930; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17172930 - 7 Sep 2025
Viewed by 1823
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Soft tissue sarcomas are rare, heterogeneous tumors with limited therapeutic options and suboptimal outcomes in advanced stages. Lurbinectedin is a promising new antineoplastic alkylating agent. This study investigates its cytotoxic effects and its potential as a radiosensitizing agent on soft tissue sarcoma. [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Soft tissue sarcomas are rare, heterogeneous tumors with limited therapeutic options and suboptimal outcomes in advanced stages. Lurbinectedin is a promising new antineoplastic alkylating agent. This study investigates its cytotoxic effects and its potential as a radiosensitizing agent on soft tissue sarcoma. Methods: Four soft tissue sarcoma cell lines were treated with lurbinectedin alone or in combination with ionizing radiation. Single-dose irradiation in a 4-day protocol was compared with prolonged treatment and an additional fractionated ionizing radiation scheme in a 6-day protocol. Cellular responses were analyzed by flow cytometry for apoptosis (Annexin V)/necrosis (7AAD) and cell cycle (Hoechst), clonogenic cell survival, and scratch assays for cell migration. Results: In the 4-day protocol, lurbinectedin induced G2/M arrest in all cell lines (p = 0.029) and significantly increased apoptosis/necrosis (p = 0.029) in SW-872. Lurbinectedin-treatment resulted in a decrease (p ≤ 0.002) of clonogenic cells in all cell lines. In the scratch assay, cell migration was delayed in two cell lines (p = 0.048) after lurbinectedin-treatment. Additional radiotherapy had no significant effect compared to lurbinectedin-monotherapy in apoptosis/necrosis and G/2M arrest in the 4-day protocol, clonogenic cell assay, and scratch assay. In the 6-day protocol, lurbinectedin induced an increase (p = 0.029) in G2/M arrest in all cell lines and apoptosis/necrosis in three cell lines, while resulting in a decrease (p < 0.001) of clonogenic cells. Additional radiotherapy had a significant effect on the decrease in clonogenic cells (p ≤ 0.048) in two cell lines but did not increase G2/M arrest and apoptosis/necrosis. Conclusions: Lurbinectedin had strong effects on three of the selected cell lines by inducing G2/M arrest, promoting apoptosis/necrosis, and reducing clonogenic survival, suggesting that it may be a promising chemotherapeutic agent in soft tissue sarcoma treatment. The effect on the fourth cell line was limited, as well as the effect on cell migration. Single-dose irradiation occasionally interfered with the effects of Lurbinectedin, whereas adding fractionated irradiation caused an additional decrease in clonogenic survival, indicating that the combination of Lurbinectedin with fractionated ionizing radiation may have promising effects. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Radiotherapy for Sarcoma)
Show Figures

Figure 1

1 pages, 126 KB  
Correction
Correction: Povo-Retana et al. Trabectedin and Lurbinectedin Modulate the Interplay between Cells in the Tumour Microenvironment—Progresses in Their Use in Combined Cancer Therapy. Molecules 2024, 29, 331
by Adrián Povo-Retana, Rodrigo Landauro-Vera, Carlota Alvarez-Lucena, Marta Cascante and Lisardo Boscá
Molecules 2025, 30(11), 2472; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30112472 - 5 Jun 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 737
Abstract
In the published publication [...] Full article
8 pages, 2089 KB  
Case Report
Durable Objective Response to Lurbinectedin in Small Cell Bladder Cancer with TP53 Mutation: A Molecular-Directed Strategy
by Mohammad Jad Moussa, Jaanki Khandelwal, Nathaniel R. Wilson, Sagar A. Naik, Vivek Subbiah, Matthew T. Campbell, Pavlos Msaouel, Parminder Singh and Omar Alhalabi
Curr. Oncol. 2024, 31(6), 3342-3349; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31060254 - 13 Jun 2024
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 5238
Abstract
Small cell bladder cancer (SCBC) is a rare and aggressive disease, often treated with platinum/etoposide-based chemotherapy. Key molecular drivers include the inactivation of onco-suppressor genes (TP53, RB1) and amplifications in proto-oncogenes (MYC). We report a patient with SCBC [...] Read more.
Small cell bladder cancer (SCBC) is a rare and aggressive disease, often treated with platinum/etoposide-based chemotherapy. Key molecular drivers include the inactivation of onco-suppressor genes (TP53, RB1) and amplifications in proto-oncogenes (MYC). We report a patient with SCBC who achieved an objective and prolonged response to lurbinectedin, which has been approved for metastatic small cell lung cancer, after developing disease progression on cisplatin/etoposide and nivolumab/ipilimumab. A genomic analysis of a metastatic biopsy prior to lurbinectedin initiation revealed a TP53 mutation and amplification of the cell cycle regulators E2F3 and MYCL. A repeat biopsy following the development of lurbinectedin resistance showed a new actionable ERBB2 alteration without significant change in the tumor mutation burden (six mutations/Mb). The present report suggests that lurbinectedin may be active and should be further explored in SCBC harboring TP53 mutations and amplifications in E2F3 and MYC family complexes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Genitourinary Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1834 KB  
Article
Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Lurbinectedin Administrated with Itraconazole in Cancer Patients: A Drug–Drug Interaction Study
by Irene Moreno, Tatiana Hernández, Emiliano Calvo, Salvador Fudio, Carmen Kahatt, Sara Martínez, Jorge Luis Iglesias, Román Octavio Calafati, Laura Pérez-Ramos, Lola Montilla, Ali Zeaiter and Rubin Lubomirov
Mar. Drugs 2024, 22(4), 178; https://doi.org/10.3390/md22040178 - 16 Apr 2024
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3760
Abstract
This open-label, two-part, phase Ib drug–drug interaction study investigated whether the pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety profiles of lurbinectedin (LRB), a marine-derived drug, are affected by co-administration of itraconazole (ITZ), a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor, in adult patients with advanced solid tumors. In Part A, [...] Read more.
This open-label, two-part, phase Ib drug–drug interaction study investigated whether the pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety profiles of lurbinectedin (LRB), a marine-derived drug, are affected by co-administration of itraconazole (ITZ), a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor, in adult patients with advanced solid tumors. In Part A, three patients were sequentially assigned to Sequence 1 (LRB 0.8 mg/m2, 1-h intravenous [IV] + ITZ 200 mg/day oral in Cycle 1 [C1] and LRB alone 3.2 mg/m2, 1 h, IV in Cycle 2 [C2]). In Part B, 11 patients were randomized (1:1) to receive either Sequence 1 (LRB at 0.9 mg/m2 + ITZ in C1 and LRB alone in C2) or Sequence 2 (LRB alone in C1 and LRB + ITZ in C2). Eleven patients were evaluable for PK analysis: three in Part A and eight in Part B (four per sequence). The systemic total exposure of LRB increased with ITZ co-administration: 15% for Cmax, area under the curve (AUC) 2.4-fold for AUC0–t and 2.7-fold for AUC0–∞. Co-administration with ITZ produced statistically significant modifications in the unbound plasma LRB PK parameters. The LRB safety profile was consistent with the toxicities described in previous studies. Co-administration with multiple doses of ITZ significantly altered LRB systemic exposure. Hence, to avoid LRB overexposure when co-administered with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors, an LRB dose reduction proportional to CL reduction should be applied. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Marine Pharmacology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1248 KB  
Article
In-Silico Identification of Novel Pharmacological Synergisms: The Trabectedin Case
by Laura Mannarino, Nicholas Ravasio, Maurizio D’Incalci, Sergio Marchini and Marco Masseroli
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(4), 2059; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25042059 - 8 Feb 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2779
Abstract
The in-silico strategy of identifying novel uses for already existing drugs, known as drug repositioning, has enhanced drug discovery. Previous studies have shown a positive correlation between expression changes induced by the anticancer agent trabectedin and those caused by irinotecan, a topoisomerase I [...] Read more.
The in-silico strategy of identifying novel uses for already existing drugs, known as drug repositioning, has enhanced drug discovery. Previous studies have shown a positive correlation between expression changes induced by the anticancer agent trabectedin and those caused by irinotecan, a topoisomerase I inhibitor. Leveraging the availability of transcriptional datasets, we developed a general in-silico drug-repositioning approach that we applied to investigate novel trabectedin synergisms. We set a workflow allowing the identification of genes selectively modulated by a drug and possible novel drug interactions. To show its effectiveness, we selected trabectedin as a case-study drug. We retrieved eight transcriptional cancer datasets including controls and samples treated with trabectedin or its analog lurbinectedin. We compared gene signature associated with each dataset to the 476,251 signatures from the Connectivity Map database. The most significant connections referred to mitomycin-c, topoisomerase II inhibitors, a PKC inhibitor, a Chk1 inhibitor, an antifungal agent, and an antagonist of the glutamate receptor. Genes coherently modulated by the drugs were involved in cell cycle, PPARalpha, and Rho GTPases pathways. Our in-silico approach for drug synergism identification showed that trabectedin modulates specific pathways that are shared with other drugs, suggesting possible synergisms. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Pharmacology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1558 KB  
Article
Impact of a Moderate CYP3A4 Inducer (Bosentan) on Lurbinectedin Pharmacokinetics and Safety in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors: An Open-Label, Two-Way, Crossover, Phase Ib Drug–Drug Interaction Study
by Irene Moreno, Tatiana Hernández, Emiliano Calvo, Salvador Fudio, Carmen Kahatt, Cristian Fernández, Jorge Luis Iglesias, Gema Corral, Laura Pérez-Ramos, Lola Montilla, Ali Zeaiter and Rubin Lubomirov
Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17(2), 182; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17020182 - 30 Jan 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2971
Abstract
This open-label, two-way, crossover, phase Ib drug–drug interaction study investigated whether the pharmacokinetics (PKs) and safety profile of lurbinectedin (LRB) are affected by co-administration of a moderate CYP3A4 inducer (bosentan, BOS) in adult patients with advanced solid tumors. Eleven patients were randomly assigned [...] Read more.
This open-label, two-way, crossover, phase Ib drug–drug interaction study investigated whether the pharmacokinetics (PKs) and safety profile of lurbinectedin (LRB) are affected by co-administration of a moderate CYP3A4 inducer (bosentan, BOS) in adult patients with advanced solid tumors. Eleven patients were randomly assigned to Sequence 1 (LRB + BOS in Cycle 1 [C1] and LRB alone in Cycle 2 [C2]) or Sequence 2 (LRB alone in C1 and LRB + BOS in C2), and finally, eight patients (four per sequence) were considered evaluable for PK assessment. LRB (3.2 mg/m2, 1 h [h], intravenous) was administered alone or combined with multiple BOS administration (125 mg/12 h oral; 5.5 days). Co-administration with BOS decreased the systemic total exposure (area under the curve, AUC) of LRB by 21% for AUC0–t and 20% for AUC0–∞ and increased clearance by 25%. Co-administration with BOS did not significantly modify the unbound plasma LRB PK parameters. BOS increased the conversion of LRB to its metabolite M1, with no changes on its metabolite M4. The LRB safety profile was consistent with the toxicities previously described for this drug. No differences in terms of toxicity were found between LRB with and without BOS. In summary, the magnitude of the observed changes precludes a clinically relevant effect of BOS co-administration on LRB exposure and its safety profile. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Drug-Drug Interactions (DDI) and Personalized Medicine in Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 1808 KB  
Review
Trabectedin and Lurbinectedin Modulate the Interplay between Cells in the Tumour Microenvironment—Progresses in Their Use in Combined Cancer Therapy
by Adrián Povo-Retana, Rodrigo Landauro-Vera, Carlota Alvarez-Lucena, Marta Cascante and Lisardo Boscá
Molecules 2024, 29(2), 331; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29020331 - 9 Jan 2024
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 8262 | Correction
Abstract
Trabectedin (TRB) and Lurbinectedin (LUR) are alkaloid compounds originally isolated from Ecteinascidia turbinata with proven antitumoral activity. Both molecules are structural analogues that differ on the tetrahydroisoquinoline moiety of the C subunit in TRB, which is replaced by a tetrahydro-β-carboline in LUR. TRB [...] Read more.
Trabectedin (TRB) and Lurbinectedin (LUR) are alkaloid compounds originally isolated from Ecteinascidia turbinata with proven antitumoral activity. Both molecules are structural analogues that differ on the tetrahydroisoquinoline moiety of the C subunit in TRB, which is replaced by a tetrahydro-β-carboline in LUR. TRB is indicated for patients with relapsed ovarian cancer in combination with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, as well as for advanced soft tissue sarcoma in adults in monotherapy. LUR was approved by the FDA in 2020 to treat metastatic small cell lung cancer. Herein, we systematically summarise the origin and structure of TRB and LUR, as well as the molecular mechanisms that they trigger to induce cell death in tumoral cells and supporting stroma cells of the tumoral microenvironment, and how these compounds regulate immune cell function and fate. Finally, the novel therapeutic venues that are currently under exploration, in combination with a plethora of different immunotherapeutic strategies or specific molecular-targeted inhibitors, are reviewed, with particular emphasis on the usage of immune checkpoint inhibitors, or other bioactive molecules that have shown synergistic effects in terms of tumour regression and ablation. These approaches intend to tackle the complexity of managing cancer patients in the context of precision medicine and the application of tailor-made strategies aiming at the reduction of undesired side effects. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 7342 KB  
Article
Preclinical Synergistic Combination Therapy of Lurbinectedin with Irinotecan and 5-Fluorouracil in Pancreatic Cancer
by Tej Tummala, Ashley Sanchez Sevilla Uruchurtu, Arielle De La Cruz, Kelsey E. Huntington, Andrew George, Nicholas R. Liguori, Leiqing Zhang, Lanlan Zhou, Abbas E. Abbas, Christopher G. Azzoli and Wafik S. El-Deiry
Curr. Oncol. 2023, 30(11), 9611-9626; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30110696 - 31 Oct 2023
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 5033
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is a devastating disease with a poor prognosis. Novel chemotherapeutics in pancreatic cancer have shown limited success, illustrating the urgent need for new treatments. Lurbinectedin (PM01183; LY-01017) received FDA approval in 2020 for metastatic small cell lung cancer on or after [...] Read more.
Pancreatic cancer is a devastating disease with a poor prognosis. Novel chemotherapeutics in pancreatic cancer have shown limited success, illustrating the urgent need for new treatments. Lurbinectedin (PM01183; LY-01017) received FDA approval in 2020 for metastatic small cell lung cancer on or after platinum-based chemotherapy and is currently undergoing clinical trials in a variety of tumor types. Lurbinectedin stalls and degrades RNA Polymerase II and introduces breaks in DNA, causing subsequent apoptosis. We now demonstrate lurbinectedin’s highly efficient killing of human-derived pancreatic tumor cell lines PANC-1, BxPC-3, and HPAF-II as a single agent. We further demonstrate that a combination of lurbinectedin and irinotecan, a topoisomerase I inhibitor with FDA approval for advanced pancreatic cancer, results in the synergistic killing of pancreatic tumor cells. Western blot analysis of combination therapy indicates an upregulation of γH2AX, a DNA damage marker, and the Chk1/ATR pathway, which is involved in replicative stress and DNA damage response. We further demonstrate that the triple combination between lurbinectedin, irinotecan, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) results in a highly efficient killing of tumor cells. Our results are developing insights regarding molecular mechanisms underlying the therapeutic efficacy of a novel combination drug treatment for pancreatic cancer. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Role of Tumor Microenvironment in Pancreatic Cancer Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 2485 KB  
Review
Drug Repurposing for Targeting Myeloid-Derived Suppressor-Cell-Generated Immunosuppression in Ovarian Cancer: A Literature Review of Potential Candidates
by Yani Berckmans, Yannick Hoffert, Ann Vankerckhoven, Erwin Dreesen and An Coosemans
Pharmaceutics 2023, 15(7), 1792; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15071792 - 22 Jun 2023
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 4052
Abstract
The lethality of patients with ovarian cancer (OC) remains high. Current treatment strategies often do not lead to the desired outcome due to the development of therapy resistance, resulting in high relapse rates. Additionally, clinical trials testing immunotherapy against OC have failed to [...] Read more.
The lethality of patients with ovarian cancer (OC) remains high. Current treatment strategies often do not lead to the desired outcome due to the development of therapy resistance, resulting in high relapse rates. Additionally, clinical trials testing immunotherapy against OC have failed to reach significant results to date. The OC tumor microenvironment and specifically myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) are known to generate immunosuppression and inhibit the anti-tumor immune response following immunotherapy treatment. Our review aims to characterize potential candidate treatments to target MDSC in OC through drug-repurposing. A literature search identified repurposable compounds with evidence of their suppressing the effect of MDSC. A total of seventeen compounds were withheld, of which four were considered the most promising. Lurbinectedin, metformin, celecoxib, and 5-azacytidine have reported preclinical effects on MDSC and clinical evidence in OC. They have all been approved for a different indication, characterizing them as the most promising candidates for repurposing to treat patients with OC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Drug Repurposing and Delivery Systems for Immunotherapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 1364 KB  
Article
Real World Patient Eligibility for Second Line Lurbinectedin Based Treatment in Small Cell Lung Cancer: Understanding Epidemiology and Estimating Health Care Utilization
by Rebekah Rittberg, Bonnie Leung, Zamzam Al-Hashami and Cheryl Ho
Curr. Oncol. 2022, 29(12), 9744-9752; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29120765 - 8 Dec 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3987
Abstract
Background: In the ATLANTIS study, second-line lurbinectedin/doxorubicin did not improve overall survival (OS), however patients with a chemotherapy-free interval (CTFI) of ≥180 days had an improved progression free survival (PFS). The objective of this retrospective study was to identify the proportion of real-world [...] Read more.
Background: In the ATLANTIS study, second-line lurbinectedin/doxorubicin did not improve overall survival (OS), however patients with a chemotherapy-free interval (CTFI) of ≥180 days had an improved progression free survival (PFS). The objective of this retrospective study was to identify the proportion of real-world small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients who are suitable for lurbinectedin-based therapy based on these criteria. Methods: A retrospective study of all SCLC referred to BC Cancer between 2012 and 2017 was conducted. Patient demographics, staging, treatment, and survival data were collected retrospectively. Baseline characteristics were compared using descriptive statistics. OS was calculated using Kaplan–Meier curves. Statistically significant p-value was <0.05. Results: A total of 1048 patients were identified. Baseline characteristics: median age 68 years, 47% male, 61% current smoking status, 68% extensive disease. Best supportive care was received by 22%. First-line systemic therapy was platinum doublet for 71% of the population. Second-line systemic therapy was delivered to 22%. Of the 219 patients who received second-line systemic therapy after platinum doublet, 183 patients had a CTFI of ≥90 days and 107 patients had a CTFI of ≥180 days. Patients originally treated as limited stage disease, received platinum doublet as second line, received thoracic radiation (RT) or prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) were more likely to have a CTFI of ≥90 and ≥180 days. Conclusion: In our real-world SCLC population, only 21% of the SCLC population received second-line therapy after platinum doublet with 17% achieving CTFI of ≥90 days and 10% CTFI of ≥180 days. Based on this retrospective review, only a small fraction of platinum-treated patients would be preferentially offered lurbinectedin in the second-line setting. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Advances in Anti-Cancer Drugs)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2590 KB  
Article
Antibody-Drug Conjugate Targeting c-Kit for the Treatment of Small Cell Lung Cancer
by Kwang-Hyeok Kim, Jin-Ock Kim, Jeong-Yang Park, Min-Duk Seo and Sang Gyu Park
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(4), 2264; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23042264 - 18 Feb 2022
Cited by 22 | Viewed by 6944
Abstract
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for 15–25% of all lung cancers. It exhibits a rapid doubling time and a high degree of invasiveness. Additionally, overexpression of c-Kit occurs in 70% of SCLC patients. [...] Read more.
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for 15–25% of all lung cancers. It exhibits a rapid doubling time and a high degree of invasiveness. Additionally, overexpression of c-Kit occurs in 70% of SCLC patients. In this study, we evaluated an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) that targets c-Kit, which is a potential therapeutic agent for SCLC. First, we generated and characterized 4C9, a fully human antibody that targets c-Kit and specifically binds to SCLC cells expressing c-Kit with a binding affinity of KD = 5.5 × 10−9 M. Then, we developed an ADC using DM1, a microtubule inhibitor, as a payload. 4C9-DM1 efficiently induced apoptosis in SCLC with an IC50 ranging from 158 pM to 4 nM. An in vivo assay using a xenograft mouse model revealed a tumor growth inhibition (TGI) rate of 45% (3 mg/kg) and 59% (5 mg/kg) for 4C9-DM1 alone. Combination treatment with 4C9-DM1 plus carboplatin/etoposide or lurbinectedin resulted in a TGI rate greater than 90% compared with the vehicle control. Taken together, these results indicate that 4C9-DM1 is a potential therapeutic agent for SCLC treatment. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1646 KB  
Article
Phase 2 Trial (POLA Study) of Lurbinectedin plus Olaparib in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors: Results of Efficacy, Tolerability, and the Translational Study
by Andres Poveda, Raquel Lopez-Reig, Ana Oaknin, Andres Redondo, Maria Jesus Rubio, Eva Guerra, Lorena Fariñas-Madrid, Alejandro Gallego, Victor Rodriguez-Freixinos, Antonio Fernandez-Serra, Oscar Juan, Ignacio Romero and Jose A. Lopez-Guerrero
Cancers 2022, 14(4), 915; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14040915 - 12 Feb 2022
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 5121
Abstract
We hypothesized that the combination of olaparib and lurbinectedin maximizes DNA damage, thus increasing its efficacy. The POLA phase 1 trial established the recommended phase 2 dose of lurbinectedin as being 1.5 mg (day 1) and that of olaparib as being 250 mg/12 [...] Read more.
We hypothesized that the combination of olaparib and lurbinectedin maximizes DNA damage, thus increasing its efficacy. The POLA phase 1 trial established the recommended phase 2 dose of lurbinectedin as being 1.5 mg (day 1) and that of olaparib as being 250 mg/12 h (days 1–5) for a 21-day cycle. In phase 2, we explore the efficacy of the combination in terms of clinical response and its correlation with mutations in the HRR genes and the genomic instability (GI) parameters. Results: A total of 73 patients with high-grade ovarian (n = 46), endometrial (n = 26), and triple-negative breast cancer (n = 1) were treated with lurbinectedin and olaparib. Most patients (62%) received ≥3 lines of prior therapy. The overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 9.6% and 72.6%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.54 months (95% CI 3.0–5.2). Twelve (16.4%) patients were considered long-term responders (LTR), with a median PFS of 13.3 months. No clinical benefit was observed for cases with HRR gene mutation. In ovarian LTRs, although a direct association with GI and a total loss of heterozygosity (LOH) events was observed, the association did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.055). Globally, the total number of LOHs might be associated with the ORR (p =0.074). The most common grade 3–4 toxicities were anemia and thrombocytopenia, in 6 (8.2%) and 3 (4.1%) patients, respectively. Conclusion: The POLA study provides evidence that the administration of lurbinectedin and olaparib is feasible and tolerable, with a DCR of 72.6%. Different GI parameters showed associations with better responses. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 3781 KB  
Article
Evaluation of the Preclinical Efficacy of Lurbinectedin in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma
by Dario P. Anobile, Paolo Bironzo, Francesca Picca, Marcello F. Lingua, Deborah Morena, Luisella Righi, Francesca Napoli, Mauro G. Papotti, Alessandra Pittaro, Federica Di Nicolantonio, Chiara Gigliotti, Federico Bussolino, Valentina Comunanza, Francesco Guerrera, Alberto Sandri, Francesco Leo, Roberta Libener, Pablo Aviles, Silvia Novello, Riccardo Taulli, Giorgio V. Scagliotti and Chiara Rigantiadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Cancers 2021, 13(10), 2332; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13102332 - 12 May 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 5610
Abstract
Background: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a highly aggressive cancer generally diagnosed at an advanced stage and characterized by a poor prognosis. The absence of alterations in druggable kinases, together with an immune-suppressive tumor microenvironment, limits the use of molecular targeted therapies, making [...] Read more.
Background: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a highly aggressive cancer generally diagnosed at an advanced stage and characterized by a poor prognosis. The absence of alterations in druggable kinases, together with an immune-suppressive tumor microenvironment, limits the use of molecular targeted therapies, making the treatment of MPM particularly challenging. Here we investigated the in vitro susceptibility of MPM to lurbinectedin (PM01183), a marine-derived drug that recently received accelerated approval by the FDA for the treatment of patients with metastatic small cell lung cancer with disease progression on or after platinum-based chemotherapy. Methods: A panel of primary MPM cultures, resembling the three major MPM histological subtypes (epithelioid, sarcomatoid, and biphasic), was characterized in terms of BAP1 status and histological markers. Subsequently, we explored the effects of lurbinectedin at nanomolar concentration on cell cycle, cell viability, DNA damage, genotoxic stress response, and proliferation. Results: Stabilized MPM cultures exhibited high sensitivity to lurbinectedin independently from the BAP1 mutational status and histological classification. Specifically, we observed that lurbinectedin rapidly promoted a cell cycle arrest in the S-phase and the activation of the DNA damage response, two conditions that invariably resulted in an irreversible DNA fragmentation, together with strong apoptotic cell death. Moreover, the analysis of long-term treatment indicated that lurbinectedin severely impacts MPM transforming abilities in vitro. Conclusion: Overall, our data provide evidence that lurbinectedin exerts a potent antitumoral activity on primary MPM cells, independently from both the histological subtype and BAP1 alteration, suggesting its potential activity in the treatment of MPM patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Malignant Mesothelioma)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop