Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (35)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = lumbar foraminal stenosis

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
12 pages, 712 KiB  
Article
Postoperative Radiologic Changes in Early Recurrent Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis After Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Foraminotomy for Lower Lumbar Segments
by Chi-Ho Kim, Pius Kim, Chang-Il Ju and Jong-Hun Seo
Diagnostics 2025, 15(10), 1299; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15101299 - 21 May 2025
Viewed by 478
Abstract
Background/Objectives: One of the surgical treatments for lumbar foraminal stenosis, full endoscopic foraminotomy, is known for its numerous advantages and favourable clinical outcomes. While previous studies have analyzed preoperative radiological risk factors associated with recurrence within one year after endoscopic foraminal decompression, no [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: One of the surgical treatments for lumbar foraminal stenosis, full endoscopic foraminotomy, is known for its numerous advantages and favourable clinical outcomes. While previous studies have analyzed preoperative radiological risk factors associated with recurrence within one year after endoscopic foraminal decompression, no research has investigated postoperative radiological changes. The aim of this study is to analyze the radiological changes occurring in cases of early recurrence within six months after endoscopic foraminal decompression. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on patients with unilateral lumbar foraminal stenosis who underwent full endoscopic foraminotomy at a single institution. The study included 11 recurrent patients who initially experienced symptomatic improvement and sufficient neural decompression on radiological evaluation, but exhibited recurrent radicular pain and radiological restenosis within six months postoperatively. Additionally, 33 control patients with favourable clinical outcomes and no evidence of restenosis were analyzed. Preoperative and postoperative plain X-ray imaging was used to evaluate sagittal and coronal parameters reflecting spinal anatomical characteristics, including disc height, foraminal height, disc wedging, coronal Cobb’s angle, total lumbar lordosis angle, segmental lumbar lordosis angle, and dynamic segmental lumbar lordosis angle. The study aimed to analyze postoperative changes in these parameters between the recurrent and control groups. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Results: There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of age, sex distribution, presence of adjacent segment disease, or existence of Grade 1 spondylolisthesis. Analysis of preoperative and postoperative radiological changes revealed that, in the recurrent group, disc height and foraminal height showed a significant decrease postoperatively, while disc wedging and the coronal Cobb’s angle demonstrated a significant increase. In contrast, the control group exhibited a significant postoperative increase in the total lumbar lordosis angle and segmental lumbar lordosis angle. Conclusions: Progressive worsening of disc wedging and the coronal Cobb’s angle, and reductions in disc and foraminal height, along with minimal improvement in lumbar lordosis following TELF, suggest the presence of irreversible preoperative degenerative changes. Careful radiologic assessment and close postoperative monitoring are essential to identify patients at risk of early recurrence. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Bone and Joint Imaging—2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 5936 KiB  
Article
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predictors of Surgical Difficulty in Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Far-Lateral Disc Herniation Under Local Anesthesia
by Yong Ahn, Sungsoo Bae, Dae-Jean Jo and Byung-Rhae Yoo
Biomedicines 2025, 13(4), 778; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13040778 - 23 Mar 2025
Viewed by 526
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD) is a minimally invasive spinal surgery known for its effectiveness, lower complication rates, faster recovery, and ability to be performed under local anesthesia. However, foraminal narrowing or access pain during the transforaminal approach can delay or [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD) is a minimally invasive spinal surgery known for its effectiveness, lower complication rates, faster recovery, and ability to be performed under local anesthesia. However, foraminal narrowing or access pain during the transforaminal approach can delay or hinder surgery in patients with far-lateral lumbar disc herniation (LDH). The objectives of this study were to identify predictive factors from preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings and demographics and discuss the optimization of surgical strategies. Methods: This retrospective study included 75 patients with far-lateral LDH who underwent TELD. Preoperative demographics and MRI findings were analyzed. Surgical data, including operative time, length of hospital stay, and intraoperative pain, were recorded. Postoperative outcomes, including complications, revision surgeries, and global outcomes based on the modified Macnab criteria, were evaluated. Preoperative clinical and radiological factors affecting the operative data and results were analyzed. Results: A higher foraminal stenosis grade was significantly correlated with prolonged operative time (p < 0.01) and extended hospital stay (p < 0.01). Extraforaminal LDH was associated with more severe access pain (p < 0.01) owing to increased nerve root irritation. Access pain was significantly correlated with operative time (p < 0.01) and hospital stay (p < 0.01). Appropriate surgical techniques and intraoperative pain management can mitigate these challenges. Conclusions: Preoperative MRI findings, particularly the grade of foraminal narrowing and herniation zone, can predict surgical difficulty and outcomes in TELD for far-lateral LDH. These insights can guide tailored strategies to reduce access pain and improve procedural success under local anesthesia. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applications of Imaging Technology in Human Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 2419 KiB  
Article
Multivariable Analysis of the Association Between Lumbar and Lumbosacral MRI-Diagnosed Spinal Pathologies and Pain in Dogs
by Roger Medina-Serra, Patricia López-Abradelo, Eliseo Belda, Holly Riding-Medina, Francisco G. Laredo, Rachel Marwood, Verónica Mortera and José I. Redondo
Animals 2025, 15(5), 761; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15050761 - 6 Mar 2025
Viewed by 1658
Abstract
Lumbar and lumbosacral pain in dogs often involves multiple concurrent spinal pathologies, complicating the identification of primary pain generators. This study assessed the associations between MRI-diagnosed spinal pathologies and pain to provide clinically relevant insights for their diagnosis and management. MRI scans and [...] Read more.
Lumbar and lumbosacral pain in dogs often involves multiple concurrent spinal pathologies, complicating the identification of primary pain generators. This study assessed the associations between MRI-diagnosed spinal pathologies and pain to provide clinically relevant insights for their diagnosis and management. MRI scans and clinical records of 518 client-owned dogs were retrospectively reviewed, documenting demographic data, pain status, and MRI findings. Multivariable logistic regression models evaluated the associations between spinal pathologies and pain, adjusting for age and weight. The intervertebral disc (IVD) extrusion was the primary pathology associated with lumbar pain, while radiculopathy had the strongest association with lumbosacral pain. Additional lumbosacral pathologies, including foraminal stenosis, IVD bulging, and IVD protrusion, were also significantly associated with pain. However, some dogs with MRI-diagnosed abnormalities showed no pain, whereas others with pain had no detectable MRI pathology, underscoring the need to interpret imaging within the clinical context. Pain responses observed during physical examination often overlapped between spinal and hip conditions, complicating diagnostic accuracy. These findings emphasise the importance of integrating imaging, clinical assessment, and targeted diagnostic techniques to improve pain localisation and treatment decisions, providing veterinarians with valuable data to refine the management of lumbar and lumbosacral pain in dogs. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 6198 KiB  
Article
Effects of the Severity of Stenosis on Clinical Outcomes of Indirect Decompression Using Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion
by Dong-Ho Kang, Jonghyuk Baek, Bong-Soon Chang, Hyoungmin Kim, Seong Hwa Hong and Sam Yeol Chang
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(15), 4421; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13154421 - 28 Jul 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1671
Abstract
Background: No consensus has been reached regarding the efficacy of indirect decompression through oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) in severe lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). This study investigated the impact of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based grading of central and foraminal stenosis on OLIF [...] Read more.
Background: No consensus has been reached regarding the efficacy of indirect decompression through oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) in severe lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). This study investigated the impact of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based grading of central and foraminal stenosis on OLIF outcomes in LSS patients and identified risk factors for postoperative clinical dissatisfaction. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed LSS patients who underwent OLIF with a minimum 1-year follow-up. Clinical scores obtained preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively were analyzed using the substantial clinical benefit (SCB) framework. The severity of central and foraminal stenosis in the initial MRI was assessed through qualitative grading systems. Results: Among the 145 patients, with a mean follow-up of 33.7 months, those with severe central stenosis showed a significantly higher proportion of patients achieving SCB in the visual analog scale for leg pain (94.5% versus 83.1%; p = 0.044) at one year postoperatively than those without. However, those with severe foraminal stenosis showed significantly higher Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores (p = 0.024), and lower walking ability scores in the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) (p = 0.004) at one year postoperatively than those without. The presence of a foraminal osteophyte of the superior articular process (SAP) was a significant risk factor responsible for not achieving SCB in ODI and walking ability in JOABPEQ at one year postoperatively (odds ratio: 0.20 and 0.22, respectively). Conclusions: After OLIF, patients with severe central stenosis showed clinical outcomes comparable to those without. The improvement in ODI and walking ability in JOABPEQ was limited in patients with severe foraminal stenosis. Surgeons should consider direct decompression in cases with the presence of foraminal osteophytes of SAP. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Lumbar Spine Surgery: Clinical Updates and Perspective)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 3237 KiB  
Systematic Review
Exploring Pathways for Pain Relief in Treatment and Management of Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis: A Review of the Literature
by Renat Nurmukhametov, Manuel De Jesus Encarnacion Ramirez, Medet Dosanov, Abakirov Medetbek, Stepan Kudryakov, Gervith Reyes Soto, Claudia B. Ponce Espinoza, Jeff Natalaja Mukengeshay, Tshiunza Mpoyi Cherubin, Vladimir Nikolenko, Artem Gushcha, Salman Sharif and Nicola Montemurro
Brain Sci. 2024, 14(8), 740; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14080740 - 24 Jul 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3512
Abstract
Background: Lumbar foraminal stenosis (LFS) involves the narrowing of neural foramina, leading to nerve compression, significant lower back pain and radiculopathy, particularly in the aging population. Management includes physical therapy, medications and potentially invasive surgeries such as foraminotomy. Advances in diagnostic and treatment [...] Read more.
Background: Lumbar foraminal stenosis (LFS) involves the narrowing of neural foramina, leading to nerve compression, significant lower back pain and radiculopathy, particularly in the aging population. Management includes physical therapy, medications and potentially invasive surgeries such as foraminotomy. Advances in diagnostic and treatment strategies are essential due to LFS’s complexity and prevalence, which underscores the importance of a multidisciplinary approach in optimizing patient outcomes. Method: This literature review on LFS employed a systematic methodology to gather and synthesize recent scientific data. A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane Library databases using specific keywords related to LFS. The search, restricted to English language articles from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2023, focused on peer-reviewed articles, clinical trials and reviews. Due to the heterogeneity among the studies, data were qualitatively synthesized into themes related to diagnosis, treatment and pathophysiology. Results: This literature review on LFS analyzed 972 articles initially identified, from which 540 remained after removing duplicates. Following a rigorous screening process, 20 peer-reviewed articles met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed. These studies primarily focused on evaluating the diagnostic accuracy, treatment efficacy and pathophysiological insights into LFS. Conclusion: The comprehensive review underscores the necessity for precise diagnostic and management strategies for LFS, highlighting the role of a multidisciplinary approach and the utility of a unified classification system in enhancing patient outcomes in the face of this condition’s increasing prevalence. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Trends and Technologies in Modern Neurosurgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 1709 KiB  
Article
Quantifying Lumbar Foraminal Volumetric Dimensions: Normative Data and Implications for Stenosis—Part 2 of a Comprehensive Series
by Renat Nurmukhametov, Manuel De Jesus Encarnacion Ramirez, Medet Dosanov, Abakirov Medetbek, Stepan Kudryakov, Laith Wisam Alsaed, Gennady Chmutin, Gervith Reyes Soto, Jeff Ntalaja Mukengeshay, Tshiunza Mpoyi Chérubin, Vladimir Nikolenko, Artem Gushcha, Sabino Luzzi, Andreina Rosario Rosario, Carlos Salvador Ovalle, Katherine Valenzuela Mateo, Jesus Lafuente Baraza, Juan Carlos Roa Montes de Oca, Carlos Castillo Rangel and Salman Sharif
Med. Sci. 2024, 12(3), 34; https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci12030034 - 22 Jul 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3345
Abstract
Introduction: Lumbar foraminal stenosis (LFS) occurs primarily due to degenerative changes in older adults, affecting the spinal foramina and leading to nerve compression. Characterized by pain, numbness, and muscle weakness, LFS arises from structural changes in discs, joints, and ligaments, further complicated by [...] Read more.
Introduction: Lumbar foraminal stenosis (LFS) occurs primarily due to degenerative changes in older adults, affecting the spinal foramina and leading to nerve compression. Characterized by pain, numbness, and muscle weakness, LFS arises from structural changes in discs, joints, and ligaments, further complicated by factors like inflammation and spondylolisthesis. Diagnosis combines patient history, physical examination, and imaging, while management ranges from conservative treatment to surgical intervention, underscoring the need for a tailored approach. Materials and Methods: This multicenter study, conducted over six years at a tertiary hospital, analyzed the volumetric dimensions of lumbar foramina and their correlation with nerve structures in 500 patients without lumbar pathology. Utilizing high-resolution MRI with a standardized imaging protocol, eight experienced researchers independently reviewed the images for accurate measurements. The study emphasized quality control through the calibration of measurement tools, double data entry, validation checks, and comprehensive training for researchers. To ensure reliability, interobserver and intraobserver agreements were analyzed, with statistical significance determined by kappa statistics and the Student’s t-test. Efforts to minimize bias included blinding observers to patient information and employing broad inclusion criteria to mitigate referral and selection biases. The methodology and findings aim to enhance the understanding of normal lumbar foramina anatomy and its implications for diagnosing and treating lumbar conditions. Results: The study’s volumetric analysis of lumbar foramina in 500 patients showed a progressive increase in foraminal volume from the L1/L2 to the L5/S1 levels, with significant enlargement at L5/S1 indicating anatomical and biomechanical complexity in the lumbar spine. Lateral asymmetry suggested further exploration. High interobserver and intraobserver agreement levels (ICC values of 0.91 and 0.95, respectively) demonstrated the reliability and reproducibility of measurements. The patient cohort comprised 58% males and 42% females, highlighting a balanced gender distribution. These findings underscore the importance of understanding foraminal volume variations for lumbar spinal health and pathology. Conclusion: Our study significantly advances spinal research by quantifying lumbar foraminal volumes, revealing a clear increase from the L1/L2 to the L5/S1 levels, indicative of the spine’s adaptation to biomechanical stresses. This provides clinicians with a precise tool to differentiate between pathological narrowing and normal variations, enhancing the detection and treatment of lumbar foraminal stenosis. Despite limitations like its cross-sectional design, the strong agreement in measurements underscores the method’s reliability, encouraging future research to further explore these findings’ clinical implications. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2340 KiB  
Article
Classification of Osteophytes Occurring in the Lumbar Intervertebral Foramen
by Abdullah Emre Taçyıldız and Feyza İnceoğlu
Tomography 2024, 10(4), 618-631; https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography10040047 - 19 Apr 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3385
Abstract
Background: Surgeons have limited knowledge of the lumbar intervertebral foramina. This study aimed to classify osteophytes in the lumbar intervertebral foramen and to determine their pathoanatomical characteristics, discuss their potential biomechanical effects, and contribute to developing surgical methods. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, [...] Read more.
Background: Surgeons have limited knowledge of the lumbar intervertebral foramina. This study aimed to classify osteophytes in the lumbar intervertebral foramen and to determine their pathoanatomical characteristics, discuss their potential biomechanical effects, and contribute to developing surgical methods. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, non-randomized, single-center study involving 1224 patients. The gender, age, and anatomical location of the osteophytes in the lumbar intervertebral foramina of the patients were recorded. Results: Two hundred and forty-nine (20.34%) patients had one or more osteophytes in their lumbar 4 and 5 foramina. Of the 4896 foramina, 337 (6.88%) contained different types of osteophytes. Moreover, four anatomical types of osteophytes were found: mixed osteophytes in 181 (3.69%) foramina, osteophytes from the lower endplate of the superior vertebrae in 91 (1.85%) foramina, osteophytes from the junction of the pedicle and lamina of the upper vertebrae in 39 foramina (0.79%), and osteophytes from the upper endplate of the lower vertebrae in 26 (0.53%) foramina. The L4 foramen contained a significantly higher number of osteophytes than the L5 foramen. Osteophyte development increased significantly with age, with no difference between males and females. Conclusions: The findings show that osteophytic extrusions, which alter the natural anatomical structure of the lumbar intervertebral foramina, are common and can narrow the foramen. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic AI in Medical Imaging and Image Processing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 3845 KiB  
Article
The Spatial Characteristics of Intervertebral Foramina within the L4/L5 and L5/S1 Motor Segments of the Spine
by Piotr Nowak, Mikołaj Dąbrowski, Adam Druszcz and Łukasz Kubaszewski
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(6), 2263; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14062263 - 7 Mar 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2603
Abstract
The prevalence of lower back pain and radicular pain in the population requires more and more accurate diagnostic methods to more effectively prevent and treat patients with these ailments. In this paper, we focused on one of the causes of lower back pain [...] Read more.
The prevalence of lower back pain and radicular pain in the population requires more and more accurate diagnostic methods to more effectively prevent and treat patients with these ailments. In this paper, we focused on one of the causes of lower back pain and radicular pain—lumbar foraminal stenosis (LFS). The aim of the study is to assess the morphometry of the intervertebral canals in the lumbar spine at the levels of the L4/L5 and L5/S1 motor segments. The obtained results showed correlations between the circumference and the surface area on individual cross-sections of the intervertebral canals at the L4/L5 and L5/S1 levels and determined the approximate shape of the root canal and its variability. On this basis, we were able to determine the influences of the patient’s age and sex on the morphometric parameters of the intervertebral canals at the L4/L5 and L5/S1 levels. Further research is needed in this area, taking into account additional factors influencing the shape of intervertebral canals. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Imaging in Orthopedic Biomechanics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 4584 KiB  
Article
Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Lateral Recess Decompression for Octogenarian Patients
by Yong Ahn and Jun-Hyeok Jung
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(2), 515; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13020515 - 17 Jan 2024
Viewed by 2024
Abstract
The incidence of radiculopathy due to lumbar spinal stenosis has been on the increase in the aging population. However, patients aged ≥ 80 years hesitate to undergo conventional open surgery under general anesthesia because of the risk of postoperative morbidity and adverse events. [...] Read more.
The incidence of radiculopathy due to lumbar spinal stenosis has been on the increase in the aging population. However, patients aged ≥ 80 years hesitate to undergo conventional open surgery under general anesthesia because of the risk of postoperative morbidity and adverse events. Therefore, less invasive surgical alternatives are required for the elderly or medically handicapped patients. Transforaminal endoscopic lumbar lateral recess decompression (TELLRD) may be helpful for those patients. This study aimed to demonstrate the efficacy of TELLRD for treating radiculopathy in octogenarian patients. A total of 21 consecutive octogenarian patients with lumbar foraminal stenosis underwent TELLRD between January 2017 and January 2021. The inclusion criterion was unilateral radiculopathy, which stemmed from lumbar lateral recess stenosis. The pain source was verified using imaging studies and selective nerve blocks. Full-scale lateral canal decompression was performed using a percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic approach under local anesthesia. We found the pain scores and functional status improved significantly during the 24-month follow-up period. The clinical improvement rate was 95.24% (20 of 21 patients) with no systemic complication. In conclusion, endoscopic lateral recess decompression via the transforaminal approach is practical for octogenarian patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1008 KiB  
Article
The Fate of Pre-Existing L5-S1 Degeneration following Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion of L4-L5 and Above
by Dong-Ho Kang, Ji Hwan Kim, Bong-Soon Chang, Hyoungmin Kim, Dongook Kim, Sanghyun Park, Seong Hwa Hong and Sam Yeol Chang
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(23), 7463; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12237463 - 1 Dec 2023
Viewed by 1620
Abstract
Background: Previous studies have identified various risk factors for adjacent segment disease (ASD) at the L5-S1 level after fusion surgery, including preoperative sagittal imbalance, longer fusion, and preoperative disc degeneration. However, only a few studies have explored the risk factors for ASD at [...] Read more.
Background: Previous studies have identified various risk factors for adjacent segment disease (ASD) at the L5-S1 level after fusion surgery, including preoperative sagittal imbalance, longer fusion, and preoperative disc degeneration. However, only a few studies have explored the risk factors for ASD at the L5-S1 level after oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) at the L4-L5 level and above. This study aimed to identify the risk factors for symptomatic ASD at the L5-S1 level in patients with pre-existing degeneration after OLIF at L4-L5 and above. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients who underwent OLIF at L4-L5 and above, with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. Patients with central stenosis or Lee grade 2 or 3 foraminal stenosis at L5-S1 preoperatively were excluded. Patients were divided into ASD and non-ASD groups based on the occurrence of new-onset L5 or S1 radicular pain requiring epidural steroid injection (ESI). The clinical and radiological factors were analyzed. Logistic regression was used to identify the risk factors for ASD of L5-S1. Results: A total of 191 patients with a mean age ± standard deviation of 68.6 ± 8.3 years were included. Thirty-four (21.7%) patients underwent ESI at the L5 root after OLIF. In the logistic regression analyses, severe disc degeneration (OR (95% confidence interval (CI)): 2.65 (1.16–6.09)), the presence of facet effusion (OR (95% CI): 2.55 (1.05–6.23)), and severe paraspinal muscle fatty degeneration (OR (95% CI): 4.47 (1.53–13.05)) were significant risk factors for ASD in L5-S1. Conclusions: In this study, the presence of facet effusion, severe disc degeneration, and severe paraspinal muscle fatty degeneration at the L5-S1 level were associated with the development of ASD at L5-S1 following OLIF at L4-L5 and above. For patients with these conditions, surgeons could consider including L5-S1 in the fusion when considering OLIF at the L4-L5 level and above. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 2902 KiB  
Case Report
Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF) for Lumbar Hemivertebra in an Adult Using Three-Dimensional-Printed Patient-Specific Implants and Virtual Surgery Planning: A Technical Report
by Tajrian Amin, William C. H. Parr, Pragadesh Natarajan, Andrew Lennox, Lianne Koinis and Ralph J. Mobbs
Surg. Tech. Dev. 2023, 12(4), 199-210; https://doi.org/10.3390/std12040019 - 8 Nov 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2516
Abstract
Introduction: Hemivertebrae are a common defect of vertebral formation, potentially resulting in debilitating congenital scoliosis and necessitating highly traumatic surgery. Virtual surgical planning (VSP) and 3D-printed patient-specific implants (PSIs) have increasingly been applied to complex spinal surgery, and offer a range of potential [...] Read more.
Introduction: Hemivertebrae are a common defect of vertebral formation, potentially resulting in debilitating congenital scoliosis and necessitating highly traumatic surgery. Virtual surgical planning (VSP) and 3D-printed patient-specific implants (PSIs) have increasingly been applied to complex spinal surgery, and offer a range of potential benefits. Research Question: We report the use of 3D-printed PSIs and VSP as part of a two-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) for the management of lateral hemivertebra and congenital scoliosis. Material and Methods: A 53-year-old male with chronic low-back pain, due to L4 hemivertebra and mild congenital scoliosis, presented with new-onset leg pain. CT revealed L4/5 and L5/S1 degeneration and foraminal stenosis. Given the complex anatomy and extensive multi-level osteophytosis, 3D-printed PSIs were designed, manufactured, and implanted as part of a two-level ALIF. Results: Excellent implant fit was achieved intraoperatively, confirmed via postoperative imaging. VSP assisted with navigating challenging bony and vascular anatomy. Three-month postoperative imaging demonstrated construct stability, early signs of bony fusion, with implant placement, spinal curvature, and disc height corrections closely matching the VSP. Clinically, the patient’s pain and functional impairment had effectively resolved by nine-month follow up, as demonstrated through subjective and objective measures. Discussion and Conclusions: Virtual surgical planning and 3D-printed PSIs can be useful surgical aids in the management of the often-complex cases involving hemivertebrae and congenital scoliosis. This case of congenital pathology adds to the growing reports of PSI application to a variety of complex spinal pathologies, with analyses showing a close match of the postoperative construct to the preoperative VSP. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 596 KiB  
Article
Predictive Factors Associated with Successful Response to Percutaneous Adhesiolysis in Chronic Lumbar Radicular Pain
by Halil Cihan Kose and Omer Taylan Akkaya
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(19), 6337; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12196337 - 3 Oct 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1407
Abstract
Percutaneous adhesiolysis (PEA) is of interest in the treatment of lumbar radicular pain. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of PEA in patients with chronic lumbar radicular pain refractory to epidural steroid injections and to determine predictive factors, including demographic, clinical, and [...] Read more.
Percutaneous adhesiolysis (PEA) is of interest in the treatment of lumbar radicular pain. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of PEA in patients with chronic lumbar radicular pain refractory to epidural steroid injections and to determine predictive factors, including demographic, clinical, and procedural data, to provide superior treatment efficacy. One hundred and ninety-three patients were reviewed. Successful treatment outcome was described as a 50% reduction in the visual analog scale score. Among the 193 patients, 109 (56.2%) exhibited a positive treatment response at 12 months. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, no depression (OR, 3.105; 95% CI, 1.127–8.547; p = 0.028), no spondylolisthesis (OR, 2.976; 95% CI, 1.246–7.092; p = 0.014), no previous lumbar surgery (OR, 2.242; 95% CI, 1.067–4.716; p = 0.033), mild foraminal stenosis (OR, 3.460; 95% CI, 1.436–8.333; p = 0.006), no opioid use (OR, 1.782; 95% CI, 0.854–3.717; p = 0.123), and baseline pain scores (OR, 0.787; 95% CI, 0.583–1.064; p = 0.120) were the predictive factors significantly associated with unsuccessful treatment outcome. PEA is a useful treatment option for patients with chronic lumbar radicular pain refractory to epidural steroid injections. A history of lumbar surgery, spondylolisthesis, depression, and severe foraminal stenosis could be associated with a poor prognosis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Neurology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 3794 KiB  
Article
Revisional Endoscopic Foraminal Decompression via Modified Interlaminar Approach at L5-S1 after Failed Posterior Instrumented Lumbar Fusion in Elderly Patients
by Zheng Cao, Zhenzhou Li, Hongliang Zhao, Jinchang Wang and Shuxun Hou
Bioengineering 2023, 10(9), 1097; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10091097 - 19 Sep 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1899
Abstract
Elderly people usually have poorer surgical tolerance and a higher incidence of complications when undergoing revision surgery after posterior instrumented lumbar fusion (PILF). Full-endoscopic transforaminal surgery is a safe and effective option, but sometimes, it is difficult to revise L5-S1 foraminal stenosis (FS) [...] Read more.
Elderly people usually have poorer surgical tolerance and a higher incidence of complications when undergoing revision surgery after posterior instrumented lumbar fusion (PILF). Full-endoscopic transforaminal surgery is a safe and effective option, but sometimes, it is difficult to revise L5-S1 foraminal stenosis (FS) after PILF. Therefore, we developed full-endoscopic lumbar decompression (FELD) at the arthrodesis level via a modified interlaminar approach under local anesthesia. This study aimed to describe the technical note and clinical efficacy of the technique. Eleven patients with unilateral lower limb radiculopathy after PILF underwent selective nerve root block and then underwent FELD. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computer tomography (CT) were performed on the second postoperative day. Their clinical outcomes were evaluated with a Visual analog scale (VAS) of low back pain and sciatica pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI), and the MacNab score. Complete decompression was achieved in every case with FELD without serious complications. Postoperative VAS of sciatica pain and ODI at each time point and VAS of low back pain and ODI after three months postoperatively were significantly improved compared with those preoperative (p < 0.05). According to the MacNab criteria, seven patients (63.6%) had excellent results at the two-year follow-up, and four patients (36.4%) had good results. No patients required further revision surgery. FELD, via a modified interlaminar approach, is effective for treating unilateral L5-S1 FS after PILF in elderly people. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 2476 KiB  
Article
Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Foraminotomy for Juxta-Fusional Foraminal Stenosis
by Yong Ahn and Han-Byeol Park
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(17), 5745; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12175745 - 4 Sep 2023
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2087
Abstract
Adjacent segment foraminal stenosis is a significant adverse event of lumbar fusion. Conventional revision surgery with an extended fusion segment may result in considerable surgical morbidity owing to extensive tissue injury. Transforaminal endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy (TELF) is a minimally invasive surgical approach for [...] Read more.
Adjacent segment foraminal stenosis is a significant adverse event of lumbar fusion. Conventional revision surgery with an extended fusion segment may result in considerable surgical morbidity owing to extensive tissue injury. Transforaminal endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy (TELF) is a minimally invasive surgical approach for symptomatic foraminal stenosis. This study aimed to demonstrate the surgical technique and clinical outcomes of TELF for the treatment of juxta-fusional foraminal stenosis. Full-scale foraminal decompression was performed via a transforaminal endoscopic approach under local anesthesia. A total of 22 consecutive patients who had undergone TELF were evaluated. The included patients had unilateral foraminal stenosis at the juxta-fusional level of the previous fusion surgery, intractable lumbar radicular pain despite at least six months of non-operative treatment, and verified pain focus by imaging and selective nerve root block. The visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores significantly improved after the two-year follow-up period. The modified MacNab criteria were excellent in six patients (27.27%), good in 12 (55.55%), fair in two (9.09%), and poor in two (9.09%), with a 90.91% symptomatic improvement rate. No significant surgical complications were observed. The minimally invasive TELF is effective for juxta-fusional foraminal stenosis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section General Surgery)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

18 pages, 1395 KiB  
Perspective
Personalized Interventional Surgery of the Lumbar Spine: A Perspective on Minimally Invasive and Neuroendoscopic Decompression for Spinal Stenosis
by Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski, Anthony Yeung, Morgan P. Lorio, Huilin Yang, Jorge Felipe Ramírez León, José Antonio Soriano Sánchez, Rossano Kepler Alvim Fiorelli, Kang Taek Lim, Jaime Moyano, Álvaro Dowling, Juan Marcelo Sea Aramayo, Jeong-Yoon Park, Hyeun-Sung Kim, Jiancheng Zeng, Bin Meng, Fernando Alvarado Gómez, Carolina Ramirez, Paulo Sérgio Teixeira De Carvalho, Manuel Rodriguez Garcia, Alfonso Garcia, Eulalio Elizalde Martínez, Iliana Margarita Gómez Silva, José Edgardo Valerio Pascua, Luis Miguel Duchén Rodríguez, Robert Meves, Cristiano M. Menezes, Luis Eduardo Carelli, Alexandre Fogaça Cristante, Rodrigo Amaral, Geraldo de Sa Carneiro, Helton Defino, Vicky Yamamoto, Babak Kateb and on behalf of Teams/Organizations/Institutionsadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13(5), 710; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13050710 - 23 Apr 2023
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 4483
Abstract
Pain generator-based lumbar spinal decompression surgery is the backbone of modern spine care. In contrast to traditional image-based medical necessity criteria for spinal surgery, assessing the severity of neural element encroachment, instability, and deformity, staged management of common painful degenerative lumbar spine conditions [...] Read more.
Pain generator-based lumbar spinal decompression surgery is the backbone of modern spine care. In contrast to traditional image-based medical necessity criteria for spinal surgery, assessing the severity of neural element encroachment, instability, and deformity, staged management of common painful degenerative lumbar spine conditions is likely to be more durable and cost-effective. Targeting validated pain generators can be accomplished with simplified decompression procedures associated with lower perioperative complications and long-term revision rates. In this perspective article, the authors summarize the current concepts of successful management of spinal stenosis patients with modern transforaminal endoscopic and translaminar minimally invasive spinal surgery techniques. They represent the consensus statements of 14 international surgeon societies, who have worked in collaborative teams in an open peer-review model based on a systematic review of the existing literature and grading the strength of its clinical evidence. The authors found that personalized clinical care protocols for lumbar spinal stenosis rooted in validated pain generators can successfully treat most patients with sciatica-type back and leg pain including those who fail to meet traditional image-based medical necessity criteria for surgery since nearly half of the surgically treated pain generators are not shown on the preoperative MRI scan. Common pain generators in the lumbar spine include (a) an inflamed disc, (b) an inflamed nerve, (c) a hypervascular scar, (d) a hypertrophied superior articular process (SAP) and ligamentum flavum, (e) a tender capsule, (f) an impacting facet margin, (g) a superior foraminal facet osteophyte and cyst, (h) a superior foraminal ligament impingement, (i) a hidden shoulder osteophyte. The position of the key opinion authors of the perspective article is that further clinical research will continue to validate pain generator-based treatment protocols for lumbar spinal stenosis. The endoscopic technology platform enables spine surgeons to directly visualize pain generators, forming the basis for more simplified targeted surgical pain management therapies. Limitations of this care model are dictated by appropriate patient selection and mastering the learning curve of modern MIS procedures. Decompensated deformity and instability will likely continue to be treated with open corrective surgery. Vertically integrated outpatient spine care programs are the most suitable setting for executing such pain generator-focused programs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Path to Personalized Pain Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop