Search Results (84)

The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the rapid development and distribution of various vaccine platforms, resulting in a significant reduction in disease severity, hospitalizations, and mortality. However, persistent challenges remain concerning the durability and breadth of vaccine-induced protection, especially in the face of emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. This review aimed to evaluate the factors influencing the immunogenicity and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines to inform future vaccine advancement strategies. A narrative review with systematic approach was conducted following PRISMA guidelines for narrative review. Literature was sourced from databases including PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for studies published between December 2019 and May 2025. Encompassed studies assessed vaccine efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety across various populations and vaccine platforms. Data were collected qualitatively, with quantitative data from reviews highlighted where available. We have uncovered a decline in vaccine efficacy over time and weakened protection against novel variants such as Delta and Omicron. Booster doses, specifically heterologous regimens, improved immunogenicity and increased protection. Vaccine-induced neutralizing antibody titers have been found to correlate with clinical protection, although the long-term correlates of immunity remain poorly defined. The induction of IgG4 antibodies after repeated mRNA vaccinations raised concerns about potential modulation of the immune response. COVID-19 vaccines have contributed significantly to pandemic control; however, their efficacy is limited by the evolution of the virus and declining immunity. Forthcoming vaccine strategies should focus on broad-spectrum, variant-adapted formulations and defining robust comparisons of protection. Recognizing the immunological basis of vaccine response, including the role of specific antibody subclasses, is fundamental for optimizing long-term protection. Full article

Background/Objectives: Foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) poses a continuous threat to livestock health and agricultural economies. Current vaccines require high biosafety standards and are costly to produce. While novel vaccine technologies have been explored, most fail to meet industrial scalability, cost-efficiency, or multiserotype flexibility required for effective FMD control. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using a high-cell density transient gene expression (TGE) system in CHO cells for the production of FMDV virus-like particles (VLPs) as a recombinant vaccine platform. Methods: VLP expression was optimized by adjusting cDNA and polyethyleneimine (PEI) concentrations. Expression yields were compared at 24 and 48 h post-transfection to determine optimal harvest timing. We further tested the system’s capacity to express different serotypes and chimeric constructs, incorporating VP1 sequences from various FMDV strains. Immunogenicity was evaluated in swine using VLPs from the A2001 Argentina strain as a model. Results: Optimal VLP expression was achieved at 24 h post-transfection. Chimeric constructs incorporating heterologous VP1 regions were successfully expressed. Immunized pigs developed protective antibody titers as measured by a virus neutralization test (VNT, log₁₀ titer 1.43) and liquid-phase blocking ELISA (LPBE, titer 2.20) at 28 days post-vaccination (dpv). Titers remained above protective thresholds up to 60 dpv with a single dose. A booster at 28 dpv further elevated titers to levels comparable to those induced by the inactivated vaccine. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate the feasibility of using CHO cell-based TGE for producing immunogenic FMDV VLPs. This platform shows promise for scalable, cost-effective, and biosafe development of recombinant FMD vaccines. Full article

Background: In recent years, the COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted global health, largely driven by the emergence of various genetic mutations within the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Although the pandemic phase has passed, the full extent of the virus’s evolutionary trajectory remains uncertain, highlighting the need for continued research in vaccine development to establish a cross-reactive approach that can effectively address different variants. This proof-of-concept study aimed to assess the effectiveness of microparticulate vaccine delivery through the minimally invasive microneedle route of administration, using a heterologous prime–booster strategy against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Method: This strategy uses the whole inactivated virus of the Delta variant for the prime dose and the whole inactivated virus of the Omicron variant for the booster dose, with alum as an adjuvant. The formulation of microparticles involves encapsulating the antigens in poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) polymer, which provides sustained release and enhances immunogenicity while protecting the antigen. Microparticles were tested for in vitro assays, and characterization included particle size, zeta potential, and encapsulation efficacy. Furthermore, serum was collected post-administration of the vaccine in mice and was tested for antibody levels. Result: In vitro assays confirmed the non-cytotoxicity and the ability of microparticles to activate the immune response of the vaccine particles. Administering this microparticulate vaccine via microneedles has proven effective for delivering vaccines through the skin. We also observed significantly higher antigen-specific antibody levels and cross-reactivity in the strains. Conclusions: Our adjuvanted microparticulate-based heterologous prime–booster vaccine strategy showed cross-reactivity among the strains and was successfully delivered using microneedles. Full article

Background: Pre-existing adenovirus immunity restricts the utilization of adenovirus-vectored vaccines. The current study aims to conduct a pooled analysis of eight clinical trials to evaluate the influence of pre-existing Ad5 neutralizing antibodies on immunogenicity of Ad5-nCoV. Methods: The primary outcome indicator of this pooled analysis is the geometric mean titers (GMTs) of live SARS-CoV-2 NAbs against the wild-type strain on day 28 post-vaccination. Participants were divided into two cohorts: an adolescent cohort comprising individuals aged 6–17 years and an adult cohort with individuals aged 18 years and older. Within each cohort, individuals were further categorized into three subgroups based on their Ad5-nCoV vaccination schedules: one subgroup received a single intramuscular dose as the primary regimen (Ad5-IM-prime), another received an intramuscular dose as the heterologous prime-boost regimen (Ad5-IM-boost), and the last subgroup received an aerosolized dose as the heterologous prime-boost regimen (Ad5-IH-boost). Results: A total of 3512 participants were included in this pooled analysis. In the Ad5-IM-prime subgroup, there were 1001 adolescents and 1450 adults; in the Ad5-IM-boost subgroup, there were 65 adolescents and 396 adults; and in the Ad5-IH-boost subgroup, there were 207 adolescents and 393 adults. In the adult cohort, the GMTs of NAbs against wild-type SARS-CoV-2 on day 28 post-vaccination for the Ad5-IM-prime, Ad5-IM-boost, and Ad5-IH-boost subgroups were 35.6 (95% CI: 32.0, 39.7), 358.3 (95% CI: 267.6, 479.6), and 2414.1 (95% CI: 2006.9, 2904.0), respectively, with negative (less than 1:12) pre-existing NAb titers compared to 10.7 (95% CI: 9.1, 12.6), 116.9 (95% CI: 84.9, 161.1), and 762.7 (95% CI: 596.2, 975.8), respectively, with high (greater than 1:1000) pre-existing NAb titers. A similar trend was observed in the adolescent cohort, where pre-existing immunity was found to reduce the peak of live SARS-CoV-2 Nabs post-vaccination. Conclusions: Regardless of whether Ad5-nCoV is administered as a primary vaccination regimen or as a heterologous prime-boost strategy, a negative impact on immunogenicity can still be observed in the presence of high pre-existing immunity. However, when primary immunization is achieved with inactivated COVID-19 vaccines, aerosol inhalation can significantly enhance the immunogenicity of Ad5-nCoV compared to intramuscular injections of Ad5-nCoV as a booster. Full article

Background/Objectives: COVID-19 vaccines have significantly reduced the mortality and morbidity associated with SARS-CoV-2. In the fall of 2021, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration amended its emergency use authorization guidelines for COVID-19 vaccines to allow the administration of booster vaccine doses based on sound scientific evidence of the increase in effectiveness conferred by boosters. The effectiveness of the Ad26.COV2.S COVID-19 booster vaccine during the periods of Delta and Omicron variant dominance is unknown. This study used real-world data to estimate the effectiveness of booster heterologous or homologous Ad26.COV2.S vaccination compared to that of a primary Ad26.COV2.S or mRNA COVID-19 vaccination series. Methods: A retrospective, observational, longitudinal cohort study design was used with a total eligible sample population consisting of 72,461,026 individuals in the HealthVerity dataset. The study cohort consisted of individuals ≥18 years in the United States with evidence of a COVID-19 primary vaccination series (Ad26.COV2.S or mRNA) administered between 1 January 2021 and 6 July 2022. Two exposure groups were considered based on retrospective database classification: a heterologous Ad26.COV2.S booster and a homologous Ad26.COV2.S booster. Individuals eligible for the referent groups, defined as those with a primary vaccine series alone, were identified through exact matching by age, sex, time since primary series vaccine, location, and Gagne comorbidity score. Propensity score-matched Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate outcomes, including COVID-19-related hospitalization and medically attended COVID-19. Results: Depending on the comparison group of interest, the adjusted hazard ratios for COVID-19-related hospitalization ranged from 0.63 (95% CI: 0.56, 0.72) to 0.82 (95% CI: 0.75, 0.90), and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.90, 0.96) to 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91, 0.97) for medically attended COVID-19, both favoring booster vaccination. Conclusions: The results of this study demonstrate the effectiveness of an Ad26.COV2.S booster vaccination compared to primary series vaccination in preventing COVID-19 hospitalization and medically attended COVID-19 for at least 12 months. This study adds to the scientific evidence that demonstrates the importance of COVID-19 booster vaccinations to support public health policy. Full article

Background: Vaccination has played a crucial role in mitigating the spread of COVID-19 and reducing its severe outcomes. While over 90% of Bangladesh’s population has received at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose, the comparative effectiveness of homologous versus heterologous booster strategies, along with the complex interplay of factors within the population, remains understudied. This study aimed to compare antibody responses between these booster approaches. Methods: This cross-sectional study enrolled 723 adults in urban Dhaka who had received COVID-19 booster doses within the last six months. Participants were grouped based on homologous or heterologous booster vaccination. Data were collected through structured household surveys, and 2 mL blood samples were collected for measuring antibody titers. Results: Heterologous booster recipients showed higher median antibody titers (8597.0 U/mL, IQR 5053.0–15,482.3) compared to homologous recipients (6958.0 U/mL, IQR 3974.0–12,728.5). In the adjusted analysis, the type of booster dose had no significant impact on antibody levels. However, the duration since the last booster dose was significantly associated with antibody levels, where each additional month since receiving the booster corresponded to approximately a 15–16% reduction in antibody levels (Adj. coeff: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.81, 0.88; p < 0.001). Participants over 40 years demonstrated higher antibody levels than younger individuals (Adj. coeff: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.07, 1.43; p = 0.005). Sex, BMI, and prior COVID-19 infection showed no significant associations with antibody levels after adjustment. Conclusion: The results underscore the complexity of immune responses across different demographic groups and suggest potential benefits of ongoing heterologous booster strategies in sustaining immunity. Full article

Background: COVID-19 became a global health crisis in early 2020, and the way out of the crisis was the rapid development of vaccines by Sinopharm, Pfizer, and Sputnik, among others, which played a crucial role in controlling the pandemic. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the long-term immune response by measuring the levels of anti-S1 IgG antibodies induced by homologous and heterologous vaccination regimens. Methods: We investigated the titer of the anti-S1 IgG antibody produced for the viral surface antigen 3, 6 months after the second dose, before the third dose, and 1, 3, and 6 months after the third dose. Results: Anti-S1 IgG antibody levels significantly increased three/six months after the second dose and following the booster in individuals without prior COVID-19 infection who received all three homologous vaccine doses. The group that initially responded poorly to Sinopharm showed a significant and sustained increase after receiving the Pfizer booster. Additionally, prior SARS-CoV-2 infection between primary and booster vaccination boosted anti-S1 antibody titers in all individuals, regardless of the vaccine used. The highest vaccine efficacy was observed during the primary vaccination period and declined over time, especially during the omicron-dominant period. Conclusions: The results suggest that while homologous and heterologous booster doses can significantly enhance anti-S1 IgG antibody levels, prior SARS-CoV-2 infection and the type of vaccine administered influence the duration and magnitude of the immune response. Full article

Background: Cellular and humoral immunity are key to the immune response against SARS-CoV-2, but the comparability and correlation across different assays remain underexplored. This study compares three T-cell and three antibody assays in two vaccine groups. Methods: This prospective longitudinal cohort study involved 46 naïve healthcare workers: a total of 11 in the homologous mRNA-1273 group (three doses) and 35 in the heterologous ChAd group (two ChAd doses followed by a BNT booster). Blood samples were collected at five time points. Cellular immunity was assessed using ELISPOT and two commercial interferon-gamma release assays: (IGRA)-QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 (QF) and Covi-FERON ELISA (CoVF). Humoral immunity was evaluated using total and IgG antibody assays and a surrogate virus neutralization test. Results: The mRNA-1273 group exhibited stronger and more consistent responses than the ChAd group. The correlations between ELISPOT and IGRA varied from weak to moderate (ρ = 0.300–0.410), while QF-IGRA and CoVF-IGRA showed stronger correlations (ρ = 0.700–0.737). The ELISPOT assay showed substantial agreement with QF [Ag2]-IGRA (k = 0.697–0.774) and CoVF [O-sp]-IGRA (k = 0.641–0.718), and an 80.4% agreement rate (k = 0.608) was found between the QF [Ag2]- and CoVF [O-sp]-IGRA tests. Three antibody assays demonstrated very strong correlations with each other and substantial to near-perfect agreement with ELISPOT (k = 0.866–0.949), QF [Ag2]-IGRA (k = 0.807–0.831), and CoVF [O-sp]-IGRA (k = 0.753–0.777). Conclusions: SARS-CoV-2-specific cellular and antibody responses vary by platform and vaccine type, highlighting the importance of measuring both T-cell and B-cell responses using multiple assays to comprehensively assess immune status. Full article

Adolescents are vulnerable to Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections; thus, their antibodies should be maintained above the protective value. This study aimed to evaluate the immune response and safety to the SARS-CoV-2 protein subunit recombinant vaccine (IndoVac^®) as a heterologous booster dose against COVID-19 in Indonesian adolescents. This open-label prospective intervention study enrolled 150 clinically healthy adolescents aged 12–17 years who had received complete primary doses of the CoronaVac^® vaccine from Garuda Primary Care Centres in Bandung City. The result of immunogenicity was presented with a 95% confidence interval (CI) and analyzed with t-tests from 14 days and 3, 6, and 12 months. The neutralizing antibody geometric mean titers (GMTs) (IU/mL) at baseline and 14 days after booster dose were 303.26 and 2661.2, respectively. The geometric mean fold rises (GMFR) at 3, 6, and 12 months after booster dose were 6.67 (5.217–8.536), 3.87 (3.068–4.886), and 2.87 (2.232–3.685), respectively. Both the neutralizing antibody and IgG antibody were markedly higher in the adolescents than in the adults at every timepoint. The incidence rate of adverse effects (AEs) until 28 days after booster dose was 82.7%, with a higher number of local events reported. Most reported solicited AEs were local pain followed by myalgia with mild intensity. Unsolicited AEs varied with each of the incidence rates < 10%, mostly with mild intensity. Adverse events of special interest (AESI) were not observed. At the 12-month follow-up after the booster dose, four serious adverse events (SAEs) not related to investigational products and research procedures were noted. This study showed that IndoVac^® has a favorable immunogenicity and safety profile as a booster in adolescents and that the antibody titer decreases over time. Full article

The SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant and its sublineages continue to cause COVID-19-associated pediatric hospitalizations, severe disease, and death globally. BNT162b2 and CoronaVac are the main vaccines used in Chile. Much less is known about the Wuhan-Hu-1 strain-based vaccines in the pediatric population compared to adults. Given the worldwide need for booster vaccinations to stimulate the immune response against new Omicron variants of SARS-CoV-2, we characterized the humoral and cellular immune response against Omicron variant BA.1 in a pediatric cohort aged 10 to 16 years who received heterologous vaccination based on two doses of CoronaVac, two doses of CoronaVac (2x) plus one booster dose of BNT162b2 [CoronaVac(2x) + BNT162b2 (1x)], two doses of CoronaVac plus two booster doses of BNT162b2 [CoronaVac(2x) + BNT162b2 (2x)], and three doses of BNT162b2. We observed that the [CoronaVac(2x) + BNT162b2 (2x)] vaccination showed higher anti-S1 and neutralizing antibody titers and CD4 and CD8 T cell immunity specific to the Omicron variant compared to immunization with two doses of CoronaVac alone. Furthermore, from all groups tested, immunity against Omicron was highest in individuals who received three doses of BNT162b2. We conclude that booster vaccination with BNT162b2, compared to two doses of CoronaVac alone, induces a greater protective immunity. Full article

Several technological approaches have been used to develop vaccines against COVID-19, including those based on inactivated viruses, viral vectors, and mRNA. This study aimed to monitor the maintenance of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in individuals from Brazil according to the primary vaccination regimen, as follows: BNT162b2 (group 1; 22) and ChAdOx1 (group 2; 18). Everyone received BNT162b2 in the first booster while in the second booster CoronaVac, Ad26.COV2.S, or BNT162b2. Blood samples were collected from 2021 to 2023 to analyze specific RBD (ELISA) and neutralizing antibodies (PRNT50). We observed a progressive increase in anti-RBD and neutralizing antibodies in each subsequent dose, remaining at high titers until the end of follow-up. Group 1 had higher anti-RBD antibody titers than group 2 after beginning the primary regimen, with significant differences after the 2nd and 3rd doses. Group 2 showed a more expressive increase after the first booster with BNT162B2 (heterologous booster). Group 2 also presented high levels of neutralizing antibodies against the Gamma and Delta variants until five months after the second booster. In conclusion, the circulating levels of anti-RBD and neutralizing antibodies against the two variants of SARS-CoV-2 were durable even five months after the 4th dose, suggesting that periodic booster vaccinations (homologous or heterologous) induced long-lasting immunity. Full article

Background: Several COVID-19 vaccines were developed and approved in China. Of these, the BIBB-CorV and CoronaVac inactivated whole-virion vaccines were widely distributed in China and developing countries. However, the performance of the two vaccines in the real world has not been summarized. Methods: A living systematic review based on findings from ongoing post-licensure studies was conducted, applying standardized algorithms. Articles published between 1 May 2020 and 31 May 2022 in English and Chinese were searched for in Medline, Embase, WanFang Data, medRxiv, bioRxiv, arXiv, SSRN, and Research Square, using SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, and vaccine as the MeSH terms. Studies with estimates of safety, immunogenicity, and effectiveness from receiving the BIBB-CorV or CoronaVac vaccine that met the predefined screening criteria underwent a full-text review. The Joanna Briggs Institute’s Critical Appraisal Checklist and the Cochrane risk of bias were used for assessment of the quality. A random-effects meta-regression model was applied to identify the potential impact factors on the vaccines’ effectiveness. Results: In total, 32578 articles were identified, of these, 770 studies underwent a full-text review. Eventually, 213 studies were included. The pooled occurrence of solicited and unsolicited adverse events after any dose of either vaccine varied between 10% and 40%. The top five commonly reported rare adverse events were immunization stress-related responses (211 cases, 50.0%), cutaneous responses (43 cases, 10.2%), acute neurological syndrome (39 cases, 9.2%), anaphylaxis (17 cases, 4.0%), and acute stroke (16 cases, 3.8%). The majority (83.3%) recovered or were relieved within several days. The peak neutralization titers against the ancestral strain was found within 1 month after the completion of the primary series of either vaccine, with a GMT (geometric mean titer) of 43.7 (95% CI: 23.2–82.4), followed by a dramatic decrease within 3 months. At Month 12, the GMT was 4.1 (95% CI: 3.8–4.4). Homologous boosting could restore humoral immunity, while heterologous boosting elicited around sixfold higher neutralization titers in comparison with homologous boosting. The effectiveness of receiving either vaccine against death and severe disease was around 85% for both shortly after the primary series. At Month 12, the protection against death did not decline, while the protection against severe disease decreased to ~75%. Conclusions: Both the BIBP-CorV and CoronaVac inactivated vaccines are safe. Sustained vaccine effectiveness against death was determined 12 months after the primary series, although protection against severe disease decreased slightly over time. A booster dose could strengthen the waning effectiveness; however, the duration of the incremental effectiveness and the additional benefit provided by a heterologous booster need to be studied. Full article

Mumps virus (MuV) causes an acute contagious human disease characterized by swelling of the parotid glands. Despite the near elimination of mumps in many countries, the disease has recurred, even in vaccinated populations, especially adolescents. Immunization effectivity of the genotype A vaccine strain Jeryl Lynn (JL) is declining as genotype A is no longer predominant; therefore, a new vaccine strain and booster vaccine are required. We generated a cell culture-adapted MuV genotype F called F30 and evaluated its immunogenicity and cross-protective activity against diverse genotypes. F30 genome nucleotide sequence determination revealed changes in the NP, L, SH, and HN genes, leading to five amino acid changes compared to a minimally passaged stock (F10). F30 showed delayed growth, smaller plaque size in Vero cells, and lower neurotoxicity in neonatal mice than F10. Furthermore, F30 was immunogenic to other genotypes, including the JL vaccine strain, with higher efficacy than that of JL for homologous and heterologous immunization. Further, F30 exhibited cross-protective immunity against MuV genotypes F and G in Ifnar^−/− mice after a third immunization with F30 following two doses of JL. Our data suggest that the live-attenuated virus F30 could be an effective booster vaccine to control breakthrough infections and mumps epidemics. Full article

COVID-19 vaccination strategies, including heterologous prime–boost regimens and additional booster doses, aim to optimize immune responses. However, seroepidemiological studies on immune responses to different COVID-19 vaccine types and schedules remain limited. This study investigated antibody levels following homologous and heterologous prime-and-boost COVID-19 vaccination in Bangladesh. In a cohort of 606 participants who received first/second/booster doses of vaccines (AstraZeneca, Moderna, Pfizer-BioNTech, and Sinopharm), anti-spike IgG and anti-nucleocapsid IgG levels were measured. Antibody titer variations with respect to age, gender, intervals between doses, and prior infection status were analyzed. mRNA vaccines elicited the highest antibody levels after homologous and heterologous boosting. The AstraZeneca booster resulted in a sharp titer decline rate of ~0.04 units per day. Second or booster vaccine doses significantly increased antibody levels, especially in males (p < 0.05). Older age correlated with higher titers, likely reflecting previous infection, which was further confirmed by the elevation of anti-nucleocapsid IgG levels. About 95.5% of non-Sinopharm recipients were anti-nucleocapsid IgG positive, suggesting prior exposure exceeding self-reported infections (12.5%). mRNA and heterologous COVID-19 boosting enhances humoral immunity over homologous prime–boost vector/inactivated vaccination. However, waning immunity merits further investigation across vaccine platforms. Full article

Booster doses of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine have been recommended to improve and prolong immunity, address waning immunity over time, and contribute to the control of the COVID-19 pandemic. A heterologous booster vaccine strategy may offer advantages over a homologous approach. To compare the immunogenicity of two doses of BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine with a ChAdOx1-S booster dose, immunoglobulin G (IgG) anti-spike (anti-S) and anti-nucleocapsid (anti-N) antibody titers (Ab) were compared over 1 year and post-booster vaccination. Results showed that, at 3- to 9-month assessments in vaccinated subjects, an-ti-N Ab were undetectable in participants with no history of COVID-19. In contrast, anti-S Ab measurements were lower than those with COVID-19, and a decrease was observed during the 9 months of observation. After booster vaccination, no differences were found in anti-S between participants who reported a history of COVID-19 and those who did not. Anti-S levels were higher after booster vaccination measurement vs. at 9 months in participants with COVID-19 and without COVID-19, i.e., independent of an infection history. Vaccine administration elicited a response of higher anti-S IgG levels in those infected before vaccination, although levels decreased during the first nine months. IgG anti-N titers were higher in participants with a history of declared infection and who were asymptomatic. The ChAdOx1-S booster increased anti-S Ab levels in participants regardless of whether they had been infected or not to a significantly higher value than with the first two vaccines. These findings underscore the importance of booster vaccination in eliciting a robust and sustained immune response against COVID-19, regardless of the prior infection status. Full article