Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (61)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = green price premium

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
30 pages, 866 KiB  
Article
Balancing Profitability and Sustainability in Electric Vehicles Insurance: Underwriting Strategies for Affordable and Premium Models
by Xiaodan Lin, Fenqiang Chen, Haigang Zhuang, Chen-Ying Lee and Chiang-Ku Fan
World Electr. Veh. J. 2025, 16(8), 430; https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj16080430 - 1 Aug 2025
Viewed by 221
Abstract
This study aims to develop an optimal underwriting strategy for affordable (H1 and M1) and premium (L1 and M2) electric vehicles (EVs), balancing financial risk and sustainability commitments. The research is motivated by regulatory pressures, risk management needs, and sustainability goals, necessitating an [...] Read more.
This study aims to develop an optimal underwriting strategy for affordable (H1 and M1) and premium (L1 and M2) electric vehicles (EVs), balancing financial risk and sustainability commitments. The research is motivated by regulatory pressures, risk management needs, and sustainability goals, necessitating an adaptation of traditional underwriting models. The study employs a modified Delphi method with industry experts to identify key risk factors, including accident risk, repair costs, battery safety, driver behavior, and PCAF carbon impact. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to examine premium adjustments under different risk scenarios, categorizing EVs into four risk segments: Low-Risk, Low-Carbon (L1); Medium-Risk, Low-Carbon (M1); Medium-Risk, High-Carbon (M2); and High-Risk, High-Carbon (H1). Findings indicate that premium EVs (L1 and M2) exhibit lower volatility in underwriting costs, benefiting from advanced safety features, lower accident rates, and reduced carbon attribution penalties. Conversely, budget EVs (H1 and M1) experience higher premium fluctuations due to greater accident risks, costly repairs, and higher carbon costs under PCAF implementation. The worst-case scenario showed a 14.5% premium increase, while the best-case scenario led to a 10.5% premium reduction. The study recommends prioritizing premium EVs for insurance coverage due to their lower underwriting risks and carbon efficiency. For budget EVs, insurers should implement selective underwriting based on safety features, driver risk profiling, and energy efficiency. Additionally, incentive-based pricing such as telematics discounts, green repair incentives, and low-carbon charging rewards can mitigate financial risks and align with net-zero insurance commitments. This research provides a structured framework for insurers to optimize EV underwriting while ensuring long-term profitability and regulatory compliance. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 3066 KiB  
Article
Optimal Strategies in Green Supply Chains When Considering Consumers’ Green Preferences and Government Subsidies
by Lei Wang, Tao Xu and Tingqiang Chen
Mathematics 2025, 13(13), 2209; https://doi.org/10.3390/math13132209 - 7 Jul 2025
Viewed by 247
Abstract
Green and low-carbon development of supply chains represents a practical approach to addressing climate change and enhancing corporate competitiveness. From the perspective of the relationship between policy subsidies and channel power structures, this paper constructs Stackelberg game models under four different scenarios to [...] Read more.
Green and low-carbon development of supply chains represents a practical approach to addressing climate change and enhancing corporate competitiveness. From the perspective of the relationship between policy subsidies and channel power structures, this paper constructs Stackelberg game models under four different scenarios to conduct theoretical analyses of the optimal strategies, supported by numerical simulations. The research findings reveal the following. (1) Under the product subsidy policy, the enhancement of consumers’ green preference will lead to a green premium, and in the case of the technology subsidy policy, consumers’ green preference will inhibit wholesale prices and retail prices. However, there is a threshold in the manufacturer-led case, and a “green premium” is also claimed when this threshold is exceeded. (2) The effects of the product subsidy policy and the green technology level subsidy policy on prices are opposite, where an increase in the product subsidy will increase the wholesale price and retail price, while an increase in the green technology level subsidy will reduce the wholesale price. The technology subsidy policy has a more significant effect on the promotion of green technology. (3) The power of supply chain channels will directly affect corporate profits, and the leader of the supply chain often has higher profits. Compared with product subsidies, technology subsidies can inhibit the channel power of retailers. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 1368 KiB  
Article
Unveiling the Value of Green Amenities: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Urban Greenspace Impact on Residential Property Prices Across Riyadh Neighborhoods
by Tahar Ledraa and Sami Abdullah Aldubikhi
Buildings 2025, 15(12), 2088; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15122088 - 17 Jun 2025
Viewed by 630
Abstract
The literature shows greenspaces generally increase nearby property values, but in Riyadh, this relationship is complex and understudied. Existing studies lack sector-specific analyses across Riyadh’s neighborhoods, overlook the impact of the Green Riyadh Project launched in 2019, and fail to address negative externalities [...] Read more.
The literature shows greenspaces generally increase nearby property values, but in Riyadh, this relationship is complex and understudied. Existing studies lack sector-specific analyses across Riyadh’s neighborhoods, overlook the impact of the Green Riyadh Project launched in 2019, and fail to address negative externalities associated with large greenspaces in an arid, privacy-conscious context. Such paradoxical impact of larger greenspaces bordering major roads at the neighborhood edge, unexpectedly reduce property values by 2–4% due to petty crime, congestion, poor upkeep, and privacy concerns, contrasting with 10–18% premiums for properties abutting greenspaces with restricted access in affluent neighborhoods. Global studies typically report positive greenspace effects, so negative impacts in specific Riyadh sectors are surprising. This highlights the city’s unique arid, cultural, and urban dynamics in addressing this research gap. The research uses purposive quota sampling of Riyadh neighborhood greenspaces and a mixed-methods approach of quantitative hedonic pricing analysis combined with qualitative semi-structured interviews with real estate agents. Findings underscore the need for tailored urban planning (e.g., mitigating petty crime, overcrowding, poor maintenance). This suggests the importance of integrating green infrastructure into urban planning, not only for its ecological and social benefits but also for its tangible positive impact on property values. Poor greenspace upkeep and safety concerns can reduce price premiums of abutting properties. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Architectural Design, Urban Science, and Real Estate)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 729 KiB  
Article
Dynamics of Green and Conventional Bonds: Hedging Effectiveness and Sustainability Implication
by Rihab Belguith
Int. J. Financial Stud. 2025, 13(2), 106; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs13020106 - 6 Jun 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 524
Abstract
This research examines the challenges of issuing green bonds due to a lack of established benchmarks. We compare regional differences between the U.S. and the E.U., hypothesizing that issuers of green bonds stand to benefit from comparing them to conventional (black) bonds. As [...] Read more.
This research examines the challenges of issuing green bonds due to a lack of established benchmarks. We compare regional differences between the U.S. and the E.U., hypothesizing that issuers of green bonds stand to benefit from comparing them to conventional (black) bonds. As most investors prioritize net positive returns as opposed to intangible sustainability metrics, the existence of a “green premium”, defined as the opportunity to price green bonds differently, remains to be proven. To this end, we employ a time-varying parameter vector autoregression (TVP-VAR), first deriving dynamic variance–covariance matrices and then conducting variance decomposition analysis to gauge connectedness and spillover effects of various bond benchmarks. Implementing multivariate portfolio construction strategies, we investigate the hedging capabilities of green and black bonds. Our findings show that both green and black bonds contribute to portfolio diversification as a risk management strategy. The paper highlights the role played by green bonds in promoting financial stability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Investment and Sustainable Finance)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 297 KiB  
Article
Green Washing, Green Bond Issuance, and the Pricing of Carbon Risk: Evidence from A-Share Listed Companies
by Zhenyu Zhu, Yixiang Tian, Xiaoying Zhao and Huiling Huang
Sustainability 2025, 17(11), 4788; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17114788 - 23 May 2025
Viewed by 999
Abstract
As global climate change intensifies and carbon emission policies become increasingly stringent, carbon risk has emerged as a crucial factor influencing corporate operations and financial markets. Based on data from A-share listed companies in China from 2009 to 2022, this paper empirically examines [...] Read more.
As global climate change intensifies and carbon emission policies become increasingly stringent, carbon risk has emerged as a crucial factor influencing corporate operations and financial markets. Based on data from A-share listed companies in China from 2009 to 2022, this paper empirically examines the pricing mechanism of carbon risk in the Chinese capital market and explores how different corporate signaling behaviors affect the carbon risk premium. The findings reveal the following: (1) Carbon risk exhibits a significant positive premium (annualized at about 1.33% per standard deviation), which remains robust over longer time windows and after replacing the measurement variables. (2) Heterogeneity analysis shows that the carbon risk premium is not significant in high-energy-consuming industries or before the signing of the Paris Agreement, possibly due to changes in investor expectations and increased green awareness. Additionally, a significant difference in the carbon risk premium exists between brown and green stocks, reflecting a “labeling effect” of green attributes. (3) Issuing green bonds, as an active corporate signaling behavior, effectively mitigates the carbon risk premium, indicating that market investors highly recognize and favor firms that actively convey green signals. (4) A “greenwashing” indicator constructed from textual analysis of environmental information disclosure suggests that greenwashing leads to a mispricing of the carbon risk premium. Companies that issue false green signals—publicly committing to environmental protection but failing to implement corresponding emission reduction measures—may mislead investors and create adverse selection problems. Finally, this paper provides recommendations for corporate carbon risk management and policy formulation, offering insights for both research and practice in the field. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Economic and Business Aspects of Sustainability)
22 pages, 2528 KiB  
Review
Sustainability-Linked Bonds Research: A Bibliometric and Content Analysis Review
by Clarisse Heck Machado, Miguel Sousa and Manuel Castelo Branco
Int. J. Financial Stud. 2025, 13(2), 62; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs13020062 - 9 Apr 2025
Viewed by 1554
Abstract
One of the most significant recent developments in the debt financing sector pertains to new products and standards applicable to sustainability-related issues. Therefore, research on this has increased substantially. One of the most recent such developments is that of sustainability-linked bonds (SLBs). In [...] Read more.
One of the most significant recent developments in the debt financing sector pertains to new products and standards applicable to sustainability-related issues. Therefore, research on this has increased substantially. One of the most recent such developments is that of sustainability-linked bonds (SLBs). In 2023, global sustainable bond issuance experienced an increase of three percent, nearly reaching USD 1 trillion with significant shifts observed in categories, including green-, social-, sustainability-, and sustainability-linked bonds (GSSSBs). This paper presents one of the most extensive literature reviews on SLBs research, examining trends, research evolution, thematic landscape, and underexplored topics by employing bibliometric and content analysis approaches. It identifies future research avenues and trends, including supporting issuers in transitioning towards net-zero emissions or broader objectives, such as implementing sustainability targets to fight climate change, the premium associated with bond pricing, the potential for greenwashing, and the blockchain technology for issuance and target’s monitoring transparency. In addition, this paper discusses the new trend of thematic bonds, such as those addressing gender characteristics, as innovative strategies to promote societal equity. The systematic literature review also explores the significance of SLBs as public instruments, like sovereign bonds or private instruments, while identifying research areas, including linking SLBs with the evolution of management theory. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Investing and Financial Services)
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 1409 KiB  
Article
Is the Energy Transition of Housing Financially Viable? Unlocking the Potential of Deep Retrofits with New Business Models
by Ezio Micelli, Giulia Giliberto and Eleonora Righetto
Buildings 2025, 15(7), 1175; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15071175 - 3 Apr 2025
Viewed by 846
Abstract
The transition to energy-efficient buildings is a priority of the European EPBD (Energy Performance Building Directive) and requires deep retrofits to reduce consumption and emissions. However, their financial viability remains underexplored. This research assesses the financial feasibility of deep retrofit interventions through innovative [...] Read more.
The transition to energy-efficient buildings is a priority of the European EPBD (Energy Performance Building Directive) and requires deep retrofits to reduce consumption and emissions. However, their financial viability remains underexplored. This research assesses the financial feasibility of deep retrofit interventions through innovative business models, focusing on the Managed Energy Services Agreement (MESA), which is considered the most effective for residential buildings. Additionally, we integrate off-site production from the Energiesprong model, which optimizes costs and time through long-term contracts and industrialized retrofit technologies. The analysis targets two investment profiles—owner/tenant and developer/entrepreneur—in Italian urban contexts with different market dynamics. A static analysis evaluates retrofits based on existing costs and technologies, while a dynamic analysis considers future profitability improvements because of cost reductions enabled by off-site production. The results indicate that, under current conditions, residential retrofitting is not financially sustainable without public subsidies. However, cost reductions driven by off-site technologies improve profitability, making large-scale retrofits feasible. Moreover, real estate market characteristics affect financial sustainability: in smaller cities, deeper cost reductions are necessary for retrofit interventions to become viable. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Study on Building Energy Efficiency Related to Simulation Models)
Show Figures

Figure 1

31 pages, 3997 KiB  
Article
Game Analysis of Green Technology Innovation Ecosystem Evolution at Carbon Peaking
by Zhengsong Zhou, Mingxing Li, Xiaomeng Chi and Asad Ullah Khan
Sustainability 2025, 17(6), 2728; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17062728 - 19 Mar 2025
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 454
Abstract
Green technological innovation is an essential pathway for transforming extensive production methods characterized by “high energy and high emissions”, achieving corporate green transformation, and ascending the value chain. Adhering to the scientific principles of energy conservation, emission reduction, and low-carbon development, this study, [...] Read more.
Green technological innovation is an essential pathway for transforming extensive production methods characterized by “high energy and high emissions”, achieving corporate green transformation, and ascending the value chain. Adhering to the scientific principles of energy conservation, emission reduction, and low-carbon development, this study, set against the backdrop of carbon peak, constructs a green technological innovation ecosystem comprising government, enterprises, and consumers. It analyzes the evolutionary processes of each stakeholder and the system under different scenarios, further simulating the impact of various factors on system equilibrium through numerical simulations. The research reveals that proactive government regulation can guide enterprises toward green technological innovation and the development of low-carbon production; an increase in consumers’ green preferences helps to expand the green consumer market and stimulates enterprises’ willingness to innovate greenly; and the initial strong willingness of each stakeholder significantly influences the system’s evolutionary path. Based on evolutionary game theory, this paper enriches the theory of green technological innovation ecosystems and provides references for overcoming barriers such as the difficulty in expanding the green consumer market and the premium pricing of green products during the green consumption process. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 6151 KiB  
Article
The Influencing Thresholds and Interactive Effects of Urban Green Spaces on Housing Prices: A Case Study of Beijing, China
by Kexin Cheng, Angshuo Zhan, Haoyuan Luo, Yujing Ma and Zhifang Wang
Land 2024, 13(12), 2161; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13122161 - 11 Dec 2024
Viewed by 1364
Abstract
As an important part of the urban ecosystem, the value of green spaces (GS) has become increasingly prominent. However, the interaction effect of GS characteristics are still not clear enough. This study explores the premium effect of different types of GS on housing [...] Read more.
As an important part of the urban ecosystem, the value of green spaces (GS) has become increasingly prominent. However, the interaction effect of GS characteristics are still not clear enough. This study explores the premium effect of different types of GS on housing prices (HP) in Beijing. The results show that all types of GS have a significant premium impact on HP, among which there are obvious distance and area thresholds for park GS. The distance range of municipal parks for premium effect is within 2000 m and, the closer to a community, the higher the value. In contrast, community-level parks only have a premium effect within 1500 m, and the most obvious distance is 500–1000 m away from the community. The area of parks has the greatest impact on HP when it is 20–50 ha, and municipal parks larger than 300 ha or community parks smaller than 2 ha do not produce a premium effect. Furthermore, GS surrounding and within communities can serve as substitutes for community-level parks, while municipal parks are irreplaceable and can synergistically influence HP increases with all types of GS. The study offers new findings on the influencing thresholds and interactive effects of GS, providing decision-making guidance for urban construction. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 3223 KiB  
Article
The Urban Park Green Spaces Landscape Premium Functional Value Accounting System: Construction and Application
by Lingling Duan, Xiang Niu and Bing Wang
Sustainability 2024, 16(23), 10612; https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310612 - 3 Dec 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1557
Abstract
Urban park green spaces have the functions of improving the urban ecological environment and providing recreational services, and at the same time, they have a certain effect on the value of the surrounding residential property. To quantitatively assess the value of the landscape [...] Read more.
Urban park green spaces have the functions of improving the urban ecological environment and providing recreational services, and at the same time, they have a certain effect on the value of the surrounding residential property. To quantitatively assess the value of the landscape premium function of park green space, many scholars have carried out research exploration and adopted a variety of methods (such as the contingent valuation method (CVM), travel cost method (TCM) and hedonic price method (HPM)), which have developed from simple theoretical models with single factors to complex empirical models with multiple factors. Among them, the hedonic price method has become the mainstream research method, and in recent years, it has been widely adopted in combination with GIS technology. In terms of research objects, single park green space or multiple park green spaces in large cities are the main focus, while there are fewer studies on park green spaces in built-up areas of small and medium-sized cities. In terms of research content, there are more studies on the value-added coefficient of landscape premium and influence distance, and there are fewer studies on the total value of landscape premium. This article aims to calculate the total landscape premium value of all park green spaces in the built-up areas of small and medium-sized cities, proposing a complete and operable accounting system for the functional value of park green space landscape premiums by combining GIS with a hedonic pricing model and remote sensing image interpretation methods. For the first time, a method for interpreting the height of residential buildings within the benefit range of landscape premium through remote sensing images is proposed, and then the floor area ratio of residential plots is estimated, so as to estimate the total area of actual beneficial buildings. Therefore, this paper takes Chifeng City, a small and medium-sized city, as a case study, and empirically demonstrates the assessment of the landscape premium function of parks and green spaces in the built-up area of Chifeng City by using this accounting system. Research shows that this method has certain feasibility, not only calculating the total value of landscape premium but also addressing the issue in existing studies where all areas within the potential range of landscape premium function are counted as appreciated areas, leading to an overestimation of the premium. It further advances the accuracy of accounting for the value of landscape premium function of urban park green space and provides theoretical reference for the planning and construction of urban park green space. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

34 pages, 4764 KiB  
Article
Multi-Party Collaboration in Agricultural Green Technology Innovation and Adoption: An Evolutionary Game Approach
by Xueli Ma, Tianyuan Ren and Sardar M. N. Islam
Sustainability 2024, 16(23), 10236; https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310236 - 22 Nov 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1498
Abstract
The collaborative promotion of agricultural green technology innovation and adoption (AGTIA) is essential for achieving green agriculture. However, there remains a need to raise both innovation and adoption levels, necessitating explorations of the effects of government subsidies and collaborative mechanisms. To this end, [...] Read more.
The collaborative promotion of agricultural green technology innovation and adoption (AGTIA) is essential for achieving green agriculture. However, there remains a need to raise both innovation and adoption levels, necessitating explorations of the effects of government subsidies and collaborative mechanisms. To this end, this paper builds an evolutionary game model to analyze the collaborative promotion of AGTIA. By introducing relevant parameters, such as government subsidies for AGTIA, dividends and liquidated damages within industrial technology innovation alliances (ITISAs), and cost reduction coefficients, this paper explores the impacts of the technology spillover effect, price premium of green agricultural products, and government subsidies on the strategic choices of related participants. The main findings are as follows: (1) The key factors influencing AGTIA are different and the government can implement different combinations of dynamic and static subsidy mechanisms at distinct stages of agricultural green development. Government subsidies play a major role at the initial stage, while ITISAs should take fuller advantage of AGTIA as green agriculture matures. (2) Increasing subsidies can promote AGTIA at the initial stage. However, an optimal range of subsidies exists, and when subsidies are higher than a certain threshold, government subsidy willingness fluctuations may lead to decreased stability. (3) There is a threshold of liquidated damages within ITISAs. Only when liquidated damages exceed the threshold can they facilitate the development of durable ITISAs and discourage free-rider behavior. The above findings can provide theoretical support for relevant government sectors when issuing policies to promote AGTIA and agricultural green development. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 8018 KiB  
Article
Leverage Effect of New-Built Green Spaces on Housing Prices in a Rapidly Urbanizing Chinese City: Regional Disparities, Impact Periodicity, and Park Size
by Siqi Yu, Shuxian Hu, Yujie Ren, Hao Xu and Weixuan Song
Land 2024, 13(10), 1663; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13101663 - 12 Oct 2024
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1877
Abstract
While newly built urban green spaces aim to address environmental concerns, the resulting green gentrification and social inequality caused by escalating property values have become critical topics of urban socio-spatial research. To prevent green initiatives from becoming unaffordable for their intended beneficiaries in [...] Read more.
While newly built urban green spaces aim to address environmental concerns, the resulting green gentrification and social inequality caused by escalating property values have become critical topics of urban socio-spatial research. To prevent green initiatives from becoming unaffordable for their intended beneficiaries in rapidly urbanizing cities, it is essential to examine the spatial and temporal relationships between the construction of new green spaces and rising housing prices. This study employs a difference-in-differences methodology to analyze regional disparities, impact periodicity, and the influence of park size on housing prices, using Nanjing, China as a case study. This result reveals that the introduction of new-built parks in Nanjing significantly impacts housing prices within an 800 m radius. The premium effect of these parks is substantially higher in urban core areas compared to suburban locales, demonstrating spatial differentials. Suburban parks temporally exhibit a prolonged lag and a shorter premium impact duration. Moreover, among various park areas, medium-sized parks demonstrate the most pronounced leverage effect, approximately double that of large parks, while small parks do not significantly affect housing prices. To mitigate the exacerbation of premium effects and enhance social justice in green strategies, we advocate prioritizing the development of small parks, particularly in urban core areas, and leveraging the temporal delay in new-built park impacts for urban policy interventions. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 1644 KiB  
Article
Navigating Geopolitical Risks: Deciphering the Greenium and Market Dynamics of Green Bonds in China
by Jiale Lian and Xiaohui Hou
Sustainability 2024, 16(15), 6354; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156354 - 25 Jul 2024
Viewed by 2337
Abstract
This study investigates whether green bonds have an issuance cost advantage over conventional bonds (greenium), examines the impact of geopolitical risks on their price dynamics, and explores the industry-specific effects of such risks in the financial sector. Using a dataset of 270 green [...] Read more.
This study investigates whether green bonds have an issuance cost advantage over conventional bonds (greenium), examines the impact of geopolitical risks on their price dynamics, and explores the industry-specific effects of such risks in the financial sector. Using a dataset of 270 green bonds and 667 conventional bonds from May 2018 to August 2021, this study applies a two-step panel estimation method to analyze the influence of geopolitical risks on green bond pricing. The findings indicate that green bonds in China have an issuance cost advantage compared to traditional bonds, with a premium of 10–12 bps. Additionally, both recent and historical geopolitical risks, including GPR threats and GPR acts, significantly reduce green bond financing costs, with the China-specific geopolitical risk index having the most substantial impact, lowering costs by up to 17.4 bps. This study also highlights the financial sector, where green bonds do not display an issuance premium, and geopolitical risk has a slightly lower effect compared to the overall market. These results provide a comprehensive analysis of the impact of geopolitical risks on the pricing of Chinese green bonds, utilize strict screening criteria and the latest two-stage panel estimation method for more reliable analytical conclusions, and establish green bonds as reliable tools for sustainable investment. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 409 KiB  
Article
Consumer Preferences for Wood-Pellet-Based Green Pricing Programs in the Eastern United States
by Sydney Oluoch, Pankaj Lal, Andres Susaeta, Meghann Smith and Bernabas Wolde
Energies 2024, 17(8), 1821; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17081821 - 10 Apr 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1560
Abstract
Co-firing wood pellets with coal is an attractive alternative energy generation method with economic, social, and environmental benefits for the US energy generation sector. One way to sustainably use wood pellets for co-firing is to create consumer-supported green pricing programs (GPPs). Our study [...] Read more.
Co-firing wood pellets with coal is an attractive alternative energy generation method with economic, social, and environmental benefits for the US energy generation sector. One way to sustainably use wood pellets for co-firing is to create consumer-supported green pricing programs (GPPs). Our study surveyed residents of five states (Alabama, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, and Virginia) to investigate preferences for the attributes of a hypothetical GPP. The study applied the Best Worst Choice method, which employs the Best Worst Scaling (BWS) and binary choice (BC) task. The BWS analysis showed that residents of all five states most value the flexibility of contracts, the location of energy generation, and the reduction of carbon emissions as attributes of GPPs. The BC analysis, however, showed that residents are willing to pay a premium for length of contract, followed by reduction of carbon emissions and variability of payments. This study shows that the adoption of optimal GPP attributes can create real customer value. The success of GPPs will depend on increasing enrollment and public support; hence, the next step will be to increase awareness levels and green consciousness through sensitization in the form of public education exercises and media campaigns. Such measures will serve to inform and educate residents on the benefits of GPPs and lessen the gap between intrinsic value and willingness to pay for select attributes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Energy Economics and Sustainable Development)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 3676 KiB  
Article
Profitability Model of Green Hydrogen Production on an Existing Wind Power Plant Location
by Andrea Dumančić, Nela Vlahinić Lenz and Lahorko Wagmann
Sustainability 2024, 16(4), 1424; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041424 - 8 Feb 2024
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3186
Abstract
This paper presents a new economic profitability model for a power-to-gas plant producing green hydrogen at the site of an existing wind power plant injected into the gas grid. The model is based on a 42 MW wind power plant, for which an [...] Read more.
This paper presents a new economic profitability model for a power-to-gas plant producing green hydrogen at the site of an existing wind power plant injected into the gas grid. The model is based on a 42 MW wind power plant, for which an optimal electrolyzer of 10 MW was calculated based on the 2500 equivalent full load hours per year and the projection of electricity prices. The model is calculated on an hourly level for all variables of the 25 years of the model. With the calculated breakeven electricity price of 74.23 EUR/MWh and the price of green hydrogen production of 99.44 EUR/MWh in 2045, the wind power plant would produce 22,410 MWh of green hydrogen from 31% of its total electricity production. Green hydrogen injected into the gas system would reduce the level of CO2 emissions by 4482 tons. However, with the projected prices of natural gas and electricity, the wind power plant would cover only 20% of the income generated by the electricity delivered to the grid by producing green hydrogen. By calculating different scenarios in the model, the authors concluded that the introduction of a premium subsidy model is necessary to accelerate deployment of electrolyzers at the site of an existing wind power plant in order to increase the wind farm profitability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Energy Economy and Sustainable Energy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop