Search Results (18)

Despite advances in surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation treatments for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), 5-year survival rates remain at nearly 11%. Cholangiocarcinoma, while not as severe, also possesses similar survival rates. Fewer than 20% of patients are surgical candidates at time of diagnosis; therefore, it is imperative that alternative therapies are effective for non-surgical patients. There are several thermal ablative techniques, including radiofrequency ablation (RFA), high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), microwave ablation (MWA), alcohol ablation, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), cryoablation, irreversible electroporation (IRE), biliary intraluminal brachytherapy, and biliary photodynamic therapy (PDT). Emerging literature in animal models and human patients has demonstrated that endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided RFA (EUS-RFA) prevents tumor progression through coagulative necrosis, protein denaturation, and activation of anticancer immunity in local and distant tumor tissue (abscopal effect). RFA treatment has been shown to not only reduce tumor-associated immunosuppressive cells but also increase functional T cells in distant tumor cells not treated with RFA. The remarkable ability to reduce tumor progression and promote tumor microenvironment (TME) remodeling makes RFA a very promising non-surgical therapy technique that has the potential to reduce mortality in this patient population. EUS-RFA offers superior precision and safety compared to other ablation techniques for pancreatic and biliary cancers, due to real-time imaging capabilities and minimally invasive nature. Future research should focus on optimizing RFA protocols, exploring combination therapies with chemotherapy or immunotherapy, and expanding its use in patients with metastatic disease. This review article will explore the current data and underlying pathophysiology of EUS-RFA while also highlighting the role of ablative therapies as a whole in immune activation response. Full article

Background: Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) is a rare pancreatic tumor with malignant potential. Its diagnosis has grown alongside increased use of abdominal imaging. SPN is suspected after classical findings in abdominal imaging studies; however, endoscopic ultrasound-guided (EUS) fine needle aspiration can support preoperative diagnosis. The treatment of choice is still surgical intervention, with an intent to reach curative resection. The prognosis is excellent. Recently, emerging data on EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) suggest changing the choice of treatment for small SPN. Methods: We provide a comprehensive overview on pancreatic SPN with a focus on treatment, adverse events, recurrence rate, and outcomes. In addition, we provide a literature summary and pool data analysis. Results: Overall, 70 papers including 6651 patients were identified. The mean SPN size was 5.8 cm, metastasis rate was 1.9%, and recurrence rate was 3%. Moreover, the mortality rate was low at 0.2%, although high postoperative adverse events were reported (32.4%). Small SPN (<2 cm) was present in 4.1% of the studies. Two studies reported EUS-RFA for small SPN <2 cm, without recurrence at a median follow-up of 18.5 months. Conclusions: SPN still necessitates surgical intervention given its malignant potential. However, EUS-RFA can represent a promising and safe therapeutic option for SPN < 2 cm. Full article

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the most challenging malignancies to treat, largely due to late diagnosis, limited surgical options, and profound resistance to systemic therapies, all of which contribute to a five-year survival rate of approximately 9%. The dense, hypoxic, and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) of PDAC plays a critical role in immune evasion and therapeutic failure. As conventional immunotherapies have shown limited efficacy in PDAC, attention has shifted toward local interventions capable of remodeling the TME to enhance immune responsiveness. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided ablative therapies have emerged as promising strategies to overcome these barriers. A range of modalities—including irreversible electroporation, microwave ablation, photodynamic therapy, and cryoablation—are under investigation. Among these, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) stands out as the most promising therapy as it not only induces direct tumor cytoreduction but also promotes antigen release, triggers immunogenic cell death, and may work synergistically with systemic therapies such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and adenosine pathway blockade. This review aims to explore the evolving role of endoscopic ablative therapies with a focus on RFA as a potential platform for immune activation in pancreatic cancer. Full article

Background/Objectives: Pancreatic neoplasms, including adenocarcinoma, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs), intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs), and high-grade cystic lesions, often require surgical resection as a form of curative treatment. However, comorbidities and high-risk features may preclude surgery. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative with proven cytoreductive efficacy in solid tumors. This case series evaluates the safety and efficacy of EUS-RFA in patients with various unresectable, non-metastatic pancreatic neoplasms. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on eight patients who underwent EUS-RFA at our institutions between July 2021 and February 2025. All patients were deemed unsuitable surgical candidates due to comorbidities such as advanced age, cardiovascular disease, renal insufficiency, and COPD or due to patient resistance to surgical intervention. EUS-RFA was performed using a 19-gauge RFA needle (Taewoong Corporation). Follow-up imaging was conducted 3 to 6 months after the completion of RFA treatment. Results: All eight patients demonstrated a good to excellent response in terms of tumor size reduction. The most notable response was observed in a patient with pNET, resulting in complete resolution from 15.6 × 12.0 mm to 0.0 × 0.0 mm after two RFA treatments. Other neoplasms, including pancreatic adenocarcinoma and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs), also demonstrated significant reductions. Mild post-procedure complications, including pancreatitis and abdominal pain, were noted in three cases. Conclusions: EUS-RFA is a promising alternative for managing unresectable pancreatic neoplasms in high-risk patients. Our findings support its use across various tumor types with favorable outcomes and minimal complications, reinforcing its role in expanding therapeutic options beyond surgery. Full article

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) represent approximately 2% of all solid pancreatic tumors. The incidence of pNENs has been increasing in the last decade. The clinical manifestations of pNENs range from hormone secretion syndromes in functioning neoplasms (F-pNENs) to local infiltration or distant metastases in late-stage diagnoses or incidental findings in small non-functioning neoplasms (NF-pNENs). While surgery is the gold-standard treatment for larger and more aggressive tumors, small and low-grade tumors (G1) may be followed-up due to the indolent course of disease. Recently, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided ablative techniques, such as ethanol injection (EUS-EI) and radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA), have emerged as promising options for loco-regional ablations in selected cases. Despite promising safety profile and efficacy, high-quality evidence is needed to support their widespread adoption. This article reviews the current state of EUS-guided locoregional therapies, patient selection criteria, procedural details, and associated risks. Full article

Background: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) has recently been proposed as an alternative treatment option for patients with unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma (uPDAC) or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC). This review aims to evaluate the technical feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes of EUS-RFA in treating PDAC, based on the available literature. Methods: Following the PRISMA-DTA guidelines, a comprehensive search of databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library, was conducted, focusing on studies reporting on EUS-RFA for PDAC. Articles involving human subjects diagnosed with PDAC and treated with EUS-RFA, written in English, and published up to 30 June 2024, were included. Key outcome measures such as technical success rate, adverse events, tumor response, and patient survival were extracted and analyzed. The review process involved title and abstract screening, followed by full-text review. A meta-analysis was performed for adverse event rates using a random-effects model. Results: We identified 11 studies according to our inclusion criteria, with a total of 137 patients with PDAC. Except for the initial experience with a lower technical success rate due to tumor-related stiffness, all subsequent studies reported a pooled success rate of 100%. Most studies referred to locally advanced or metastatic PDAC, while one reported EUS-RFA in resectable PDAC. A meta-analysis for adverse events was performed, indicating a pooled adverse event rate of 22.6% (95% confidence interval: 0.16–0.30), with the most common adverse event being mild abdominal pain. Severe complications were rare. One study reported a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 16.3 months. Overall survival and PFS were scarcely reported, with median overall survival ranging from 12 to 24 months, inferior to that of the standard approach for uPDAC consisting of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. Conclusions: EUS-RFA is a technically feasible and safe procedure for treating uPDAC or mPDAC and is under investigation for use in resectable PDAC. Even though the short-term outcomes are encouraging, larger cohort studies are necessary to understand long-term efficacy and survival benefits, including progression-free survival. Full article

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a promising minimally invasive technique for the treatment of pancreatic lesions. This review first focuses on the technical aspects in EUS-RFA: the procedure typically employs EUS probes with integrated radiofrequency electrodes, enabling accurate targeting and ablation of pancreatic lesions. Different types of RFA devices, monopolar and bipolar energy delivery systems, are discussed, along with considerations for optimal ablation, including energy settings, procedure time, and pre- and post-procedural management. This paper presents a comprehensive literature review of EUS-RFA applied to both solid and cystic pancreatic lesions, including functioning and non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs), pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs), pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), and pancreatic metastases (PMs), discussing current evidence on safety, efficacy, clinical outcomes, and adverse events (AEs). EUS-RFA is an emerging technique with expanding potential for the treatment of both benign and malignant conditions; however, further studies are needed to better define patient selection criteria, assess long-term benefits, and establish definitive indications for its use. Full article

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) has emerged as an effective and minimally invasive treatment for pancreatic lesions, particularly in patients at high surgical risk. Utilizing thermal energy, RFA induces the coagulative necrosis of the tissue and potentially triggers immunomodulation by releasing intracellular antigens. Numerous studies have confirmed the technical feasibility, safety, and efficacy of EUS-RFA in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and premalignant cystic lesions, with an acceptable profile of adverse events. The technique’s potential immunomodulatory effects offer intriguing implications for the treatment of advanced pancreatic malignancies, encouraging further evaluation. This review paper aims to highlight the EUS-RFA principles, technology, and clinical applications in various pancreatic lesions and safety, and the future research directions. Full article

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) under endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guidance has been developed and utilized over the last decade to provide the loco-regional treatment of solid and cystic pancreatic neoplastic lesions. The advantage of this approach relies on the close proximity of the EUS transducer to the target pancreatic lesion, which, coupled with the development of specifically designed RFA ablation devices, has made the procedure minimally invasive, with a clear reduction in adverse events as compared to the high morbidity of the surgical approach. EUS-RFA has been applied so far to pancreatic functional and non-functional neuroendocrine neoplasms, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma or metastases to the pancreas, and pancreatic neoplastic cysts. Excluding neuroendocrine tumors, for other indications, most of these procedures have been performed in patients who refused surgery or were at high surgical risk. More studies evaluating EUS-RFA in selected patients, not at surgical risk, are gradually becoming available and will pave the road to extend the indications for this therapeutic approach, also in association with other oncological therapies. The present manuscript will critically review the available evidence in the field of the EUS-guided RFA of solid and cystic pancreatic neoplasms. Full article

The growing importance of advanced endoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNETs) necessitates a comprehensive understanding of various biochemical markers, genetic testing methods, radiological techniques, and treatment approaches that encompass multiple disciplines within and beyond gastrointestinal oncology. This review aims to highlight key aspects of these topics, with a specific focus on emerging EUS-guided procedures for the management of PanNETs. Full article

Since its emergence as a diagnostic modality in the 1980s, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has provided the clinician profound access to gastrointestinal organs to aid in the direct visualization, sampling, and subsequent identification of pancreatic pathology. In recent years, advancements in EUS as an interventional technique have promoted the use of local ablative therapies as a minimally invasive alternative to the surgical management of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) and pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCNs), especially for those deemed to be poor operative candidates. EUS-guided local therapies have demonstrated promising efficacy in addressing a spectrum of pancreatic neoplasms, while also balancing local adverse effects on healthy parenchyma. This article serves as a review of the current literature detailing the mechanisms, outcomes, complications, and limitations of EUS-guided local ablative therapies such as chemical ablation and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of pNETs and PCNs, as well as a discussion of future applications of EUS-guided techniques to address a broader scope of pancreatic pathology. Full article

Introduction: The development of dedicated endoscopes and the technical evolution of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) have allowed a direct approach to pancreatic neoplastic lesions both for diagnosis and treatment. Among the more promising targets are pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (Pan-NETs). Aim: to describe the evolution of endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) with particular attention to the treatment of PanNETs, focusing on safety and clinical efficacy of the technique. Methods: MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies reporting about EUS-RFA for the treatment of PanNETs. Studies with outcomes of interest were selected and results were reported to describe clinical success, complications, fol-low-ups, and electrodes used. Clinical success was defined as the disappearance of clinical symp-toms for functional (F-) PanNETs and as complete ablation per nonfunctional (NF)-PanNETs. The pooled data were analyzed by a random-effects model. Results: Nineteen studies were selected, including 183 patients (82 males, 44.8%) with 196 lesions (101 F-PanNETs and 95 NF-PanNETs). Pooled estimates for the overall AE rates for the clinical efficacy were 17.8% (95% CI 9.1–26.4%) and 95.1% (95% CI 91.2–98.9%) for F-PanNETs and 24.6% (95% CI 7.4–41.8%) and 93.4% (95% CI 88.4–98.4%) for NF-PanNETs. Conclusions: EUS-RFA appears to be a mini-invasive technique with a good safety and efficacy profile for the treatment of F- and NF-PanNETs. EUS-RFA could be of-fered as possible alternative to surgery for the treatment of low-grade NF- or F-PanNETs, especially for those patients that are not eligible or are at high-risk for surgery. Full article

The morbidity associated with pancreatectomies limits surgical options for high-risk patients with pancreatic neoplasms that warrant resection. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) offers a minimally invasive and potentially definitive means to treat pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and precancerous pancreatic cystic lesions. In addition, EUS-RFA may play a role in the treatment and palliation of non-surgical cases of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The efficacy of RFA appears to be further enhanced by systemic immunomodulatory effects. Here, we review current studies on the developing role of EUS-RFA in these pancreatic pathologies. Full article

Background: Most patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are metastatic at presentation with dismal prognosis warranting improved systemic therapy options. Longitudinal sampling for the assessment of treatment response poses a challenge for validating novel therapies. In this case study, we evaluate the feasibility of collecting endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided longitudinal fine-needle aspiration biopsies (FNABs) from two PDAC patients and conduct gene expression studies associated with tumour microenvironment changes associated with radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Methods: EUS-guided serial/longitudinal FNABs of tumour were collected before and after treatment from two stage III inoperable gemcitabine-treated PDAC patients treated with targeted RFA three times. Biopsies were analysed using a custom NanoString panel (144 genes) consisting of cancer and cancer-associated fibroblast (CAFs) subtypes and immune changes. CAF culture was established from one FNAB and characterised by immunofluorescence and immunoblotting. Results: Two-course RFA led to the upregulation of the CD1E gene (involved in antigen presentation) in both patients 1 and 2 (4.5 and 3.9-fold changes) compared to baseline. Patient 1 showed increased T cell genes (CD4—8.7-fold change, CD8—35.7-fold change), cytolytic function (6.4-fold change) and inflammatory response (8-fold change). A greater than 2-fold upregulation of immune checkpoint genes was observed post-second RFA in both patients. Further, two-course RFA led to increased PDGFRα (4.5-fold change) and CAF subtypes B and C genes in patient 1 and subtypes A, B and D genes in patient 2. Patient 2-derived CAFs post-first RFA showed expression of PDGFRα, POSTN and MYH11 proteins. Finally, RFA led to the downregulation of classical PDAC subtype-specific genes in both patients. Conclusions: This case study suggests longitudinal EUS-FNAB as a potential resource to study tumour and microenvironmental changes associated with RFA treatment. A large sample size is required in the future to assess the efficacy and safety of the treatment and perform comprehensive statistical analysis of EUS-RFA-based molecular changes in PDAC. Full article

(1) Background: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) is an alternative treatment for pancreatic tumors. Currently, EUS-RFA has been trialled to treat hepatic tumors. However, little has been reported about optimal settings for EUS-RFA in patients with hepatic tumors. We evaluated the ablation effect after in vivo RFA using a new EUS-RFA electrode in a pig model. (2) Methods Four pigs were used for the in vivo test. The in vivo testing was divided into two tests based on the length of the RFA electrode (0.5, 0.7, 1 or 1.5 cm), the ablation power (30 W or 50 W), and the ablation time (10 or 15 s). In test one, ablation effect was evaluated based on the electrode length and power. In test two, ablation effect was assessed based on power and time. (3) Results: In test one, the ablation width and depth correlated with the length of the electrode and power (0.5 cm, 10 W, 10 s: width 0.46 cm, depth 0.65 cm vs. 1.5 cm, 75 W, 10 s: width 0.77 cm, depth 1.80 cm). In test two, ablation width and depth were similar when RFA was set at 1.5cm, 50 W, and 10 s or 1 cm, 30 W, and 15 s (0.65 cm, 1.14 cm vs. 0.65cm, 1.26 cm). (4) Conclusions: The relationship between electrode length, ablation power, and ablation time, and the resulting ablation effect in pig livers suggest that EUS-RFA produces effective ablation while minimizing thermal injury. Full article