Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (40)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = electronic-cigarette-generated aerosol

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
29 pages, 15822 KB  
Article
Acute E-Cigarette Aerosol Condensate Exposure Disrupts the Transcriptome and Proteome Profiles of Human Bronchial Epithelial BEAS-2B Cells
by Sara Trifunovic, Jelena Kušić-Tišma, Katarina Smiljanić, Aleksandra Divac Rankov, Jelena Dinić and Mila Ljujić
Cells 2026, 15(6), 525; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells15060525 - 16 Mar 2026
Viewed by 957
Abstract
The growing popularity of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) necessitates a better understanding of their biological effects. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of e-cigarette aerosol condensates generated from either e-cigarette carrier liquid alone or with e-cigarette liquid with nicotine and flavor [...] Read more.
The growing popularity of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) necessitates a better understanding of their biological effects. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of e-cigarette aerosol condensates generated from either e-cigarette carrier liquid alone or with e-cigarette liquid with nicotine and flavor on bronchial epithelial cells. BEAS-2B cells were exposed to e-cigarettes for 24 h, and transcriptional and proteomic profiling, including assessment of protein modifications, was performed. Additionally, cell-based assays were used to evaluate mitochondrial function, rate of protein synthesis, lysosomal signal, lipid droplet quantity and actin formation. Our findings reveal that short-term exposure to both types of aerosol condensates altered transcriptome and proteome profiles, disrupting cellular homeostasis in BEAS-2B cells through impaired proteostasis and mitochondrial function in response to both types of condensates. Changes in lipid and lysosome content, as well as a reduction in polymerized actin, were observed with nicotine- and flavor-containing condensate. E-cigarette exposure also induced irreversible protein modifications, including different chemical derivatives (25 out of 49 in nicotine/flavor condensate; 20 out of 48 in nicotine/flavor-free condensate; 4 out of 35 in control), suggesting their particularly harmful effect. Together, these findings point to early-onset cellular stress and impaired lung epithelial fitness caused by acute e-cigarette exposure. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

19 pages, 963 KB  
Article
Impacts of Mislabeled ECIG Liquids on Primary Particulate Matter Emissions
by Sarah E. Fresquez, Vijay Sivaraman, Yogesh Saini, Daniel Walker, Talia Chavis, Eric Soule and Sinan Sousan
Toxics 2026, 14(3), 256; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics14030256 - 13 Mar 2026
Viewed by 864
Abstract
Electronic cigarette (ECIG) liquids are marketed with labeled nicotine concentrations and propylene glycol (PG) to vegetable glycerin (VG) ratios, yet quality control inconsistencies may alter vaping emissions. We quantified discrepancies between labeled and measured chemical content and evaluated how these differences affect emissions [...] Read more.
Electronic cigarette (ECIG) liquids are marketed with labeled nicotine concentrations and propylene glycol (PG) to vegetable glycerin (VG) ratios, yet quality control inconsistencies may alter vaping emissions. We quantified discrepancies between labeled and measured chemical content and evaluated how these differences affect emissions of particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 µm or smaller (PM2.5). Flavor-free liquids (n = 20) spanning nicotine labels of 0, 9, 18, and 48 mg/mL and PG content from 0% to 80% were purchased. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy measured nicotine, PG, and VG. Aerosols were generated using a standardized device in a controlled exposure chamber. PM2.5 was measured using a pDR-1500 and SMPS/APS, with gravimetric correction factors calculated. Labeling inaccuracies were widespread: “nicotine-free” liquids contained 0.1 to 0.4 mg/mL nicotine, and labeled nicotine deviated by up to ±30%. PG/VG ratios were frequently incorrect; 70% of samples contained higher VG than labeled, including “100% VG” products with about 10% PG. Higher VG consistently increased PM2.5 mass, while nicotine had a minimal effect. The pDR overestimated mass, whereas SMPS/APS underestimated due to volatilization losses. Overall, inaccurate ECIG liquid labeling can alter measured PM2.5 emissions under controlled conditions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Air Pollution and Health)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

16 pages, 2189 KB  
Article
Electronic Cigarette Exposure Induces Adverse Cellular Alterations in Skeletal Muscle in Male Mice Subjected to a High-Fat Diet
by Juan Carlos Rivera, Jorge Espinoza-Derout, Kamrul Hasan, Candice J. Lao, Julian Wilson, Yin Tintut, Xuesi M. Shao, Maria C. Jordan, Kenneth P. Roos, Yanjun Liu, Amiya P. Sinha-Hikim, Vishwajeet Puri and Theodore C. Friedman
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(23), 11491; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262311491 - 27 Nov 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1038
Abstract
Electronic cigarettes (E-Cig) are a new way of delivering nicotine, gaining popularity among adolescents and young adults, who often do not realize their harmful effects. Although the adverse effects of E-Cigs on the liver and heart have been demonstrated, their effects on the [...] Read more.
Electronic cigarettes (E-Cig) are a new way of delivering nicotine, gaining popularity among adolescents and young adults, who often do not realize their harmful effects. Although the adverse effects of E-Cigs on the liver and heart have been demonstrated, their effects on the skeletal muscle have not been well studied. In this study, we evaluated the skeletal muscle effects of E-Cig aerosol, delivered in a manner similar to human vaping, in a mouse model of obesity induced by a high-fat diet (HFD). C57BL/6 mice, fed either a normal chow diet (NCD) or HFD, were exposed to either saline aerosol control or aerosol generated from Blu PLUSTM containing 0% or 2.4% nicotine for 12 weeks. Mice fed an NCD were included to distinguish whether E-Cig effects on the skeletal muscle required the presence of obesity induced by an HFD. The soleus muscle, an oxidative muscle rich in mitochondria, was assessed by Western blotting, electron microscopy, and biochemical assays. An NCD group was included to assess the baseline effects of HFD-induced obesity, on the skeletal muscle. The skeletal muscle from HFD-fed mice exposed to E-Cig 2.4% had reduced levels of phospho-AMPK compared with saline and E-Cig 0% groups, while E-Cigs had no effect on NCD-fed mice. Levels of phospho-adipose triglyceride lipase were also reduced in both E-Cig 2.4% and 0% compared with the saline group. These metabolic protein impairments were accompanied by increased levels of oxidative stress and phospho-p38 MAPK. Deregulation of the autophagy markers, microtubule-associated protein 1A/1B-light chain 3 (LC3-I; inactive form) and LC3-II (active form), was also observed, evidenced by decreased levels of LC3-II, ratio LC3-II/LC3-I, and increased levels of p62. Transmission electron microscopy analysis showed that E-Cig 2.4% induced damage to mitochondrial structure compared with the saline or E-Cig 0% groups. These findings suggest that E-Cig exposure on HFD impairs the skeletal muscle, adding to the growing list of affected organs for ongoing regulatory efforts concerning nicotine-containing substances. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Research on Skeletal Muscle Metabolism and Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 425 KB  
Review
Clinical Impact of Vaping
by Francesco Petrella, Paola Faverio, Andrea Cara, Enrico Mario Cassina, Lidia Libretti, Sara Lo Torto, Emanuele Pirondini, Federico Raveglia, Francesca Spinelli, Antonio Tuoro, Elisa Perger and Fabrizio Luppi
Toxics 2025, 13(6), 470; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13060470 - 1 Jun 2025
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 22448
Abstract
The term ‘vaping’ refers to the use of electronic cigarettes or other devices to inhale a variety of heated and aerosolized substances. Vaping has been promoted as a less harmful and potentially oncogenic alternative to nicotine cigarettes, particularly to help heavy smokers quit. [...] Read more.
The term ‘vaping’ refers to the use of electronic cigarettes or other devices to inhale a variety of heated and aerosolized substances. Vaping has been promoted as a less harmful and potentially oncogenic alternative to nicotine cigarettes, particularly to help heavy smokers quit. While vaping products do not produce the same carcinogenic substances—such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons—generated by the combustion of tobacco, and while their fluids lack tobacco-related carcinogens like nitrosamines, it is now well established that they still generate harmful and potentially oncogenic byproducts. Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain the potential oncogenic effects of vaping fluids, including direct chemical action, epithelial–mesenchymal transition induction, redox stress, mitochondrial toxicity, and DNA damage. In addition to cancer risk, there have been reports of adverse effects on cardiovascular health, reproductive function, and non-oncologic lung injuries. These include exogenous lipoid pneumonia, diffuse alveolar hemorrhage with proven alveolar injury, and vaping-associated bronchiolitis obliterans. The aim of this review is to examine vaping devices, their potential role in lung carcinogenesis, vaping-associated lung injury, and other clinical implications, including impacts on cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and respiratory diseases, and also pregnancy and fetus health. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Human Toxicology and Epidemiology)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

9 pages, 1320 KB  
Article
Effects of E-Cigarette (e-cig) Aerosols on Mutagenesis in Selected Organs in a C57 lacI (BigBlueTM) Mouse Model
by Dweet Chhaya, Merna Gress, Amna Raja, Wieslawa Kosinska, Terry Gordon, Judith Zelikoff and Joseph B. Guttenplan
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2024, 21(12), 1693; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21121693 - 19 Dec 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2463
Abstract
The objective of this study is to investigate the potential mutagenic effects of the exposure of mice to aerosols produced from the component liquids of an electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS). The use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigs) and ENDSs has increased tremendously over [...] Read more.
The objective of this study is to investigate the potential mutagenic effects of the exposure of mice to aerosols produced from the component liquids of an electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS). The use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigs) and ENDSs has increased tremendously over the past two decades. From what we know to date, ENDSs contain much lower levels of known carcinogens than tobacco smoke. While conventional tobacco smoke is a well-established mutagen, little is known about the mutagenicity of ENDS aerosols. Here, we report the mutagenic effects of a 3-month whole body exposure of C57 lacI mice (BigBlueTM) to filtered air (AIR) or ENDS aerosols in several tissues. Aerosols were generated from a 50/50 vegetable glycerin (VG)/propylene glycol (PG) mixture with and without nicotine. The results revealed that in the lung, bladder urothelial tissue, and tongue, mutagenesis was significantly greater in the VG/PG/nicotine group than in the AIR group. In all organs except the bladder, mutagenesis in the VG/PG only group was similar to those exposed to AIR. In the bladder, mutagenesis in the VG/PG group was elevated compared to that in the AIR group. In the liver, mutagenesis was modestly elevated in the VG/PG/nicotine group, but the elevation failed to reach statistical significance. Overall, there were no consistent differences in mutagenesis between the sexes. The results of this study suggest that exposure to e-cig aerosols containing nicotine represents a risk factor for carcinogenesis in several organ systems, and exposure to VG/PG alone may be a risk factor for bladder cancer. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

14 pages, 3842 KB  
Article
Applications of an Electrochemical Sensory Array Coupled with Chemometric Modeling for Electronic Cigarettes
by Bryan Eng and Richard N. Dalby
Sensors 2024, 24(17), 5676; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24175676 - 31 Aug 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1960
Abstract
This study investigates the application of an eNose (electrochemical sensory array) device as a rapid and cost-effective screening tool to detect increasingly prevalent counterfeit electronic cigarettes, and those to which potentially hazardous excipients such as vitamin E acetate (VEA) have been added, without [...] Read more.
This study investigates the application of an eNose (electrochemical sensory array) device as a rapid and cost-effective screening tool to detect increasingly prevalent counterfeit electronic cigarettes, and those to which potentially hazardous excipients such as vitamin E acetate (VEA) have been added, without the need to generate and test the aerosol such products are intended to emit. A portable, in-field screening tool would also allow government officials to swiftly identify adulterated electronic cigarette e-liquids containing illicit flavorings such as menthol. Our approach involved developing canonical discriminant analysis (CDA) models to differentiate formulation components, including e-liquid bases and nicotine, which the eNose accurately identified. Additionally, models were created using e-liquid bases adulterated with menthol and VEA. The eNose and CDA model correctly identified menthol-containing e-liquids in all instances but were only able to identify VEA in 66.6% of cases. To demonstrate the applicability of this model to a commercial product, a Virginia Tobacco JUUL product was adulterated with menthol and VEA. A CDA model was constructed and, when tested against the prediction set, it was able to identify samples adulterated with menthol 91.6% of the time and those containing VEA in 75% of attempts. To test the ability of this approach to distinguish commercial e-liquid brands, a model using six commercial products was generated and tested against randomized samples on the same day as model creation. The CDA model had a cross-validation of 91.7%. When randomized samples were presented to the model on different days, cross-validation fell to 41.7%, suggesting that interday variability was problematic. However, a subsequently developed support vector machine (SVM) identification algorithm was deployed, increasing the cross-validation to 84.7%. A prediction set was challenged against this model, yielding an accuracy of 94.4%. Altered Elf Bar and Hyde IQ formulations were used to simulate counterfeit products, and in all cases, the brand identification model did not classify these samples as their reference product. This study demonstrates the eNose’s capability to distinguish between various odors emitted from e-liquids, highlighting its potential to identify counterfeit and adulterated products in the field without the need to generate and test the aerosol emitted from an electronic cigarette. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Electrochemical Sensors: Technologies and Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 4771 KB  
Article
Effects of E-Liquids and Their Aerosols on Biofilm Formation and Growth of Oral Commensal Streptococcal Communities: Effect of Cinnamon and Menthol Flavors
by Nicole Christian, Daniel Burden, Alexander Emam, Alvin Brenk, Sarah Sperber, Michael Kalu, Giancarlo Cuadra and Dominic Palazzolo
Dent. J. 2024, 12(8), 232; https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12080232 - 23 Jul 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3834
Abstract
(1) Background: The rise in electronic cigarette (E-cigarette) popularity, especially among adolescents, has prompted research to investigate potential effects on health. Although much research has been carried out on the effect on lung health, the first site exposed to vaping—the oral cavity—has received [...] Read more.
(1) Background: The rise in electronic cigarette (E-cigarette) popularity, especially among adolescents, has prompted research to investigate potential effects on health. Although much research has been carried out on the effect on lung health, the first site exposed to vaping—the oral cavity—has received relatively little attention. The aims of this study were twofold: to examine the effects of E-liquids on the viability and hydrophobicity of oral commensal streptococci, and the effects of E-cigarette-generated aerosols on the biomass and viability of oral commensal streptococci. (2) Methods: Quantitative and confocal biofilm analysis, live–dead staining, and hydrophobicity assays were used to determine the effect on oral commensal streptococci after exposure to E-liquids and/or E-cigarette-generated aerosols. (3) Results: E-liquids and flavors have a bactericidal effect on multispecies oral commensal biofilms and increase the hydrophobicity of oral commensal streptococci. Flavorless and some flavored E-liquid aerosols have a bactericidal effect on oral commensal biofilms while having no effect on overall biomass. (4) Conclusions: These results indicate that E-liquids/E-cigarette-generated aerosols alter the chemical interactions and viability of oral commensal streptococci. Consequently, the use of E-cigarettes has the potential to alter the status of disease and health in the oral cavity and, by extension, affect systemic health. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Oral Microbiology and Related Research)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

19 pages, 1762 KB  
Article
A Practical Framework for Novel Electronic Nicotine Delivery System Evaluation: Chemical and Toxicological Characterization of JUUL2 Aerosol and Comparison with Reference Cigarettes
by David K. Cook, Guy Lalonde, Michael J. Oldham, Jiaming Wang, Austin Bates, Sifat Ullah, Christina Sulaiman, Karen Carter, Candice Jongsma, Gary Dull and I. Gene Gillman
Toxics 2024, 12(1), 41; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12010041 - 4 Jan 2024
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 5811
Abstract
Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDSs) are designed as a non-combustible alternative to cigarettes, aiming to deliver nicotine without the harmful byproducts of tobacco combustion. As the category evolves and new ENDS products emerge, it is important to continually assess the levels of toxicologically [...] Read more.
Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDSs) are designed as a non-combustible alternative to cigarettes, aiming to deliver nicotine without the harmful byproducts of tobacco combustion. As the category evolves and new ENDS products emerge, it is important to continually assess the levels of toxicologically relevant chemicals in the aerosols and characterize any related toxicology. Herein, we present a proposed framework for characterizing novel ENDS products (i.e., devices and formulations) and determining the reduced risk potential utilizing analytical chemistry and in vitro toxicological studies with a qualitative risk assessment. To demonstrate this proposed framework, long-term stability studies (12 months) analyzing relevant toxicant emissions from six formulations of a next-generation product, JUUL2, were conducted and compared to reference combustible cigarette (CC) smoke under both non-intense and intense puffing regimes. In addition, in vitro cytotoxicity, mutagenicity, and genotoxicity assays were conducted on aerosol and smoke condensates. In all samples, relevant toxicants under both non-intense and intense puffing regimes were substantially lower than those observed in reference CC smoke. Furthermore, neither cytotoxicity, mutagenicity, nor genotoxicity was observed in aerosol condensates generated under both intense and non-intense puffing regimes, in contrast to results observed for reference cigarettes. Following the proposed framework, the results demonstrate that the ENDS products studied in this work generate significantly lower levels of toxicants relative to reference cigarettes and were not cytotoxic, mutagenic, or genotoxic under these in vitro assay conditions. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1527 KB  
Review
E-Cigarettes and Associated Health Risks: An Update on Cancer Potential
by Rakesh Sahu, Kamal Shah, Rishabha Malviya, Deepika Paliwal, Sakshi Sagar, Sudarshan Singh, Bhupendra G. Prajapati and Sankha Bhattacharya
Adv. Respir. Med. 2023, 91(6), 516-531; https://doi.org/10.3390/arm91060038 - 14 Nov 2023
Cited by 62 | Viewed by 19135
Abstract
The potential cancer risk associated with electronic-cigarette (e-cigarette) use is ongoing and remains a subject of debate. E-Cigarettes work by heating a liquid that usually contains nicotine, flavorings, and other chemicals. When the liquid is heated, users inhale an aerosol into their lungs. [...] Read more.
The potential cancer risk associated with electronic-cigarette (e-cigarette) use is ongoing and remains a subject of debate. E-Cigarettes work by heating a liquid that usually contains nicotine, flavorings, and other chemicals. When the liquid is heated, users inhale an aerosol into their lungs. While e-cigarettes are generally considered less harmful than traditional tobacco products, they still contain potentially harmful chemicals, which can damage DNA and lead to cancer. Several studies have investigated the potential cancer risk associated with e-cigarette use, while other studies have suggested that e-cigarette aerosol may contain carcinogenic chemicals that could increase the risk of lung and bladder cancer in humans. However, these studies are limited in their scope and do not provide conclusive evidence. Overall, the long-term cancer risk associated with e-cigarette use remains uncertain, more research is needed to fully understand the potential risks and benefits of e-cigarettes. However, this review will allow the investigator to get more recent updates about e-cigarettes. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 286 KB  
Review
Adolescents and Electronic Vapor Product Use: A Dangerous Unknown
by Sarah Yale, Vanessa McFadden and Theresa Mikhailov
Adolescents 2023, 3(4), 667-677; https://doi.org/10.3390/adolescents3040047 - 3 Nov 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 4149
Abstract
Electronic vapor products (EVPs) are non-conventional tobacco products that use a battery to heat liquid, generating an aerosol to be inhaled by the user. Despite being initially proposed as a harm reduction tool for adults looking to quit conventional tobacco cigarettes, EVP usage [...] Read more.
Electronic vapor products (EVPs) are non-conventional tobacco products that use a battery to heat liquid, generating an aerosol to be inhaled by the user. Despite being initially proposed as a harm reduction tool for adults looking to quit conventional tobacco cigarettes, EVP usage has grown significantly in the adolescent population over the past decade. Data from the 2021 Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS) show that currently, in the United States, 36% of adolescents have ever used an EVP, 18% currently use an EVP, and 5% use EVPs daily. Initial studies have raised concerns about the health effects on multiple organ systems (e.g., respiratory, cardiovascular, and neurodevelopmental), and little information is known about the long-term effects, as well as the impacts specific to the still-developing adolescent body. EVP usage in the adolescent population is a public health crisis. The purpose of this narrative review is to address what is known thus far and to advise areas of focus for future research and advocacy. Full article
22 pages, 2876 KB  
Article
Photometric Monitoring of Electronic Cigarette Puff Topography
by Keith Kolaczyk and Hao Jiang
Sensors 2023, 23(19), 8220; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23198220 - 2 Oct 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 5265
Abstract
To study and monitor the adverse health consequences of using electronic cigarettes, a user’s puff topography, which are quantification parameters of the user’s vaping habits, plays a central role. In this work, we introduce a topography sensor to measure the mass of total [...] Read more.
To study and monitor the adverse health consequences of using electronic cigarettes, a user’s puff topography, which are quantification parameters of the user’s vaping habits, plays a central role. In this work, we introduce a topography sensor to measure the mass of total particulate matter generated in every puff and to estimate the nicotine yield. The sensor is compact and low-cost, and is integrated into the electronic cigarette device to promptly and conveniently monitor the user’s daily puff topography. The topography sensor is comprised of a photometric sensor and a pressure sensor. The photometric sensor measures the mass concentration of the aerosol, based on scattering of near-infrared light from airborne particles, while the pressure sensor measures the flow rate. The topography sensor was tested under various conditions including a wide range of atomizer power, puff duration, and inhalation pressure. The sensor’s accuracy was validated by comparing the sensor’s readings with reference measurements, and the results matched closely with the trends reported by existing studies on electronic cigarettes. An example application for tracking a user’s puff topography was also demonstrated. Our topography sensor holds great promise in mitigating the health risks of vaping, and in promoting quality control of electronic cigarette products. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 819 KB  
Review
Heated Tobacco Products: Insights into Composition and Toxicity
by Swapna Upadhyay, Mizanur Rahman, Gunnar Johanson, Lena Palmberg and Koustav Ganguly
Toxics 2023, 11(8), 667; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11080667 - 2 Aug 2023
Cited by 79 | Viewed by 19742
Abstract
Heated tobacco products (HTPs) are novel products that allow users to inhale nicotine by heating (350 °C) reconstituted tobacco rather than combustion (900 °C) as in conventional cigarettes. HTP sticks containing reconstituted tobacco come in various flavours such as menthol, citrus, etc., like [...] Read more.
Heated tobacco products (HTPs) are novel products that allow users to inhale nicotine by heating (350 °C) reconstituted tobacco rather than combustion (900 °C) as in conventional cigarettes. HTP sticks containing reconstituted tobacco come in various flavours such as menthol, citrus, etc., like electronic cigarette liquids. Thus, the composition of HTP aerosol will also vary according to the flavouring agents added. Overall, the content of toxic chemicals in HTP aerosol appears to be lower than in cigarette smoke. However, the concentrations of more than twenty harmful and potentially harmful constituents have been reported to be higher in HTP aerosol than in cigarette smoke. Further, several toxic compounds not detected in cigarette smoke are also reported in HTP aerosol. Thus, the risks of HTP use remain unknown. Most of the available data on the composition and health effects of mainstream HTP aerosol exposure are generated by the tobacco industry. Few independent studies have reported short-term pathophysiological effects of HTP use. Currently available HTP toxicity data are mainly on the pulmonary and cardiovascular systems. Moreover, there are no long-term toxicity data and, therefore, the claims of the tobacco industry regarding HTPs as a safer alternative to traditional combustible cigarettes are unsubstantiated. Furthermore, HTP aerosol contains the highly addictive substance nicotine, which is harmful to the adolescent brain, developing foetuses, pregnant women, and also adults. Hence, comprehensive studies addressing the safety profiling related to long-term HTP use are warranted. With this background, the following review summarizes the current state of knowledge on HTP toxicity on four broad lines: composition of mainstream HTP aerosol compared to traditional combustible cigarette smoke, biomarkers of HTP exposure, health effects of HTP exposure, and the harm reduction aspect. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Assessing Novel Tobacco Products)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1920 KB  
Review
An Overview of E-Cigarette Impact on Reproductive Health
by Debbie Montjean, Marie-Hélène Godin Pagé, Marie-Claire Bélanger, Moncef Benkhalifa and Pierre Miron
Life 2023, 13(3), 827; https://doi.org/10.3390/life13030827 - 18 Mar 2023
Cited by 31 | Viewed by 27387
Abstract
Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are often considered a “safe substitute” for conventional cigarette cessation. The composition of the fluid is not always clearly defined and shows a large variation within brands and manufacturers. More than 80 compounds were detected in liquids and aerosols. E-cigarettes [...] Read more.
Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are often considered a “safe substitute” for conventional cigarette cessation. The composition of the fluid is not always clearly defined and shows a large variation within brands and manufacturers. More than 80 compounds were detected in liquids and aerosols. E-cigarettes contain nicotine, and the addition of flavorings increases the toxicity of e-cigarette vapour in a significant manner. The heat generated by the e-cigarette leads to the oxidation and decomposition of its components, eventually forming harmful constituents in the inhaled vapour. The effects of these toxicants on male and female reproduction are well established in conventional cigarette smokers. Although toxins were measured at much lower levels in e-cigarette aerosols compared to smoke from a conventional cigarette, there are concerns about their potential impact on male and female reproduction. The information available was mainly obtained from studies conducted in animal models, and investigations in humans are scarce. However, the effects observed in animal models suggest that caution should be taken when vaping and that more research needs to be conducted to identify its potential adverse effects on fertility. The prevalence of e-cigarette usage is alarming, and warnings should be made about the impact of vaping on reproductive health. This document reviews the data regarding the impact of e-cigarette use on male and female reproduction. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Medical Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1675 KB  
Article
Toxicological Assessment of Particulate and Metal Hazards Associated with Vaping Frequency and Device Age
by Jennifer Jeon, Qian Zhang, Patrick S. Chepaitis, Roby Greenwald, Marilyn Black and Christa Wright
Toxics 2023, 11(2), 155; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11020155 - 7 Feb 2023
Cited by 24 | Viewed by 10311
Abstract
Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) aerosols are complex mixtures of chemicals, metals, and particles that may present inhalation hazards and adverse respiratory health risks. Despite being considered a safer alternative to tobacco cigarettes, metal exposure levels and respiratory effects associated with device aging [...] Read more.
Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) aerosols are complex mixtures of chemicals, metals, and particles that may present inhalation hazards and adverse respiratory health risks. Despite being considered a safer alternative to tobacco cigarettes, metal exposure levels and respiratory effects associated with device aging and vaping frequency have not been fully characterized. In this study, we utilize an automated multi-channel ENDS aerosol generation system (EAGS) to generate aerosols from JUUL pod-type ENDS using tobacco-flavored e-liquid. Aerosol puff fractions (1–50) and (101–150) are monitored and sampled using various collection media. Extracted aerosols are prepared for metal and toxicological analysis using human primary small airway epithelial cells (SAEC). ENDS aerosol-mediated cellular responses, including reactive oxygen species (ROS), oxidative stress, cell viability, and DNA damage, are evaluated after 24 h and 7-day exposures. Our results show higher particle concentrations in later puff fractions (0.135 mg/m3) than in initial puff fractions (0.00212 mg/m3). Later puff fraction aerosols contain higher toxic metal concentrations, including chromium, copper, and lead, which elicit increased levels of ROS followed by significant declines in total glutathione and cell viability. Notably, a 30% increase in DNA damage was observed after 7 days because of later puff fraction exposures. This work is consistent with ENDS aerosols becoming more hazardous across the use of pre-filled pod devices, which may threaten respiratory health. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

17 pages, 1065 KB  
Article
Non-Targeted Chemical Characterization of JUUL-Menthol-Flavored Aerosols Using Liquid and Gas Chromatography
by Mark R. Crosswhite, Lena N. Jeong, Patrick C. Bailey, J. Brian Jameson, Anastasia Lioubomirov, David Cook, Clarissa Yang, Adam Ozvald, Matthew Lyndon and I. Gene Gillman
Separations 2022, 9(11), 367; https://doi.org/10.3390/separations9110367 - 11 Nov 2022
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 3879
Abstract
The aerosol constituents generated from JUUL Menthol pods with 3.0% and 5.0% nicotine by weight (Me3 and Me5) are characterized by a non-targeted approach, which was developed to detect aerosol constituents that are not known to be present beforehand or that may be [...] Read more.
The aerosol constituents generated from JUUL Menthol pods with 3.0% and 5.0% nicotine by weight (Me3 and Me5) are characterized by a non-targeted approach, which was developed to detect aerosol constituents that are not known to be present beforehand or that may be measured with targeted methods. Three replicates from three production batches (n = 9) were aerosolized using two puffing regimens (intense and non-intense). Each of the 18 samples were analyzed by gas chromatography electron ionization mass spectrometry and by liquid chromatography electrospray ionization high-resolving power mass spectrometry. All chemical constituents determined to differ from control were identified and semi-quantified. To have a complete understanding of the aerosol constituents and chemistry, each chemical constituent was categorized into one of five groups: (1) flavorants, (2) harmful and potentially harmful constituents, (3) leachables, (4) reaction products, and (5) chemical constituents that were unable to be identified or rationalized (e.g., chemical constituents that could not be categorized in groups (1–4). Under intense puffing, 74 chemical constituents were identified in Me3 aerosols and 68 under non-intense puffing, with 53 chemical constituents common between both regimens. Eighty-three chemical constituents were identified in Me5 aerosol using an intense puffing regimen and seventy-five with a non-intense puffing regimen, with sixty-two chemical constituents in common. Excluding primary constituents, reaction products accounted for the greatest number of chemical constituents (approximately 60% in all cases, ranging from about 0.05% to 0.1% by mass), and flavorants—excluding menthol—comprised the second largest number of chemical constituents (approximately 25%, ranging consistently around 0.01% by mass). The chemical constituents detected in JUUL aerosols were then compared to known constituents from cigarette smoke to determine the relative chemical complexities and commonalities/differences between the two. This revealed (1) a substantial decrease in the chemical complexity of JUUL aerosols vs. cigarette smoke and (2) that there are between 55 (Me3) and 61 (Me5) unique chemical constituents in JUUL aerosols not reported in cigarette smoke. Understanding the chemical complexity of JUUL aerosols is important because the health effects of combustible cigarette smoke are related to the combined effect of these chemical constituents through multiple mechanisms, not just the effects of any single smoke constituent. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop