Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (68)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = delayed graft function (DGF)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
48 pages, 2354 KB  
Review
Kidney Transplantation and the Gut–Kidney Axis: Microbial, Metabolic, and Nutritional Implications for Graft and Patient Outcomes
by Leon Smółka, Miłosz Strugała, Karolina Kursa, Karolina Blady and Agata Stanek
Nutrients 2026, 18(13), 2056; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18132056 (registering DOI) - 24 Jun 2026
Abstract
Background: Kidney transplantation is the preferred treatment for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), but long-term outcomes remain limited by chronic allograft injury, infections, metabolic complications, and cardiovascular risk. Gut microbiota alterations and microbiota-derived metabolites may influence immune regulation, inflammation, drug metabolism, and graft outcomes [...] Read more.
Background: Kidney transplantation is the preferred treatment for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), but long-term outcomes remain limited by chronic allograft injury, infections, metabolic complications, and cardiovascular risk. Gut microbiota alterations and microbiota-derived metabolites may influence immune regulation, inflammation, drug metabolism, and graft outcomes through the gut–kidney axis. This review summarizes evidence on the gut microbiota in kidney transplantation, emphasizing immune tolerance, complications, cardiovascular risk, graft function, and perspectives. Methods: A structured search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to May 2026. Eligible publications included studies involving kidney transplant recipients (KTR), kidney disease or solid organ transplant populations, and mechanistic models. Evidence was synthesized narratively. Results: Gut microbiota alterations in KTR reflect pre-transplant dysbiosis and post-transplant exposures, including antibiotics, immunosuppression, infection, diet, hospitalization, and graft function. Dietary factors and nutrient-derived substrates may modulate microbial composition and production of relevant metabolites, including short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO), tryptophan-derived compounds, bile acid derivatives, and uremic toxins. Microbiota-related pathways may involve barrier dysfunction, microbial translocation, innate immune activation, altered regulatory T cell/T helper 17 (Treg/Th17) balance, metabolite signaling, uremic toxin generation, and endothelial stress. Clinical studies associate dysbiosis and microbial metabolites with diarrhea, infections, delayed graft function (DGF), rejection-related shifts, tacrolimus variability, cardiovascular risk, graft dysfunction, graft failure, and mortality. Most findings need validation. Conclusions: Gut microbiota signatures and microbial metabolites are promising markers of transplant-related risk, but not established causal determinants or therapeutic targets. Clinical translation requires standardized methods, multi-omics integration, and prospective patient- and graft-centered trials. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dietary Patterns and Nutritional Support for Kidney Diseases)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

9 pages, 303 KB  
Article
Kidney Transplantation over 65 Years: Clinical and Immunological Long-Term Outcomes—Single Center Experience
by Lucia Federica Stefanelli, Marianna Alessi, Martina Cacciapuoti, Rime Khalf, Dorella Del Prete, Francesca Katiana Martino, Lorenzo A. Calò and Federico Nalesso
Geriatrics 2026, 11(3), 66; https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics11030066 - 2 Jun 2026
Viewed by 735
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Kidney transplantation (KT) in older recipients remains challenging due to age-related conditions such as frailty and comorbidities, as well as immunological changes related to immunosenescence, which expose older KTRs to a higher risk of infection and infection-related complications. The aim of [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Kidney transplantation (KT) in older recipients remains challenging due to age-related conditions such as frailty and comorbidities, as well as immunological changes related to immunosenescence, which expose older KTRs to a higher risk of infection and infection-related complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical and immunological outcomes in older KTRs, analyzing the incidence of cardiovascular, infective, and neoplastic complications, as well as graft and patient survival and the associated risk factors. Methods: This monocentric study includes 157 KTRs aged over 65 years, followed at the Transplant Ambulatory of Padua University Hospital and transplanted between January 2013 and December 2023. Clinical and immunological outcomes were evaluated, including surgical complications, incidence of delayed graft function (DGF), and renal function at 1, 3, and 5 years after KT. Results: Patient survival rates were 96%, 91.5%, and 71.6% at 1, 3, and 5 years after KT, respectively, while graft survival rates were 94%, 87%, and 68%. Major complications were malignancies (40.1%), cardiovascular disease (33.1%), and bacterial infections (22%). In the multivariate analysis, donor age and history of malignancy were identified as independent risk factors for mortality (p = 0.048 and p = 0.056, respectively). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis confirmed donor age as the only significant risk factor for patient survival. Regarding graft survival, multivariate analysis identified hypertension as an independent risk factor for graft failure (p = 0.009), while Kaplan–Meier analysis showed diabetes (p = 0.040) and single-kidney transplantation (p = 0.003) as significant risk factors. Conclusions: KT in older recipients represents a safe and beneficial therapeutic option, offering favorable patient and graft survival outcomes. However, this epidemiological study highlights the need for personalized follow-up strategies and improved prognostic assessment in older KTRs. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 672 KB  
Article
99mTc-MAG3 Scintigraphy Within 48 h of Kidney Transplantation Predicts Long-Term Graft Survival: A Retrospective Single-Center Cohort Study
by Joseba Salguero, Laura Chamorro, Juan Marquez, Enrique Gomez-Gomez, Javier A. Cienfuegos, Juan P. Campos, Juan A. Vallejo and Jose E. Robles
Transplantology 2026, 7(2), 11; https://doi.org/10.3390/transplantology7020011 - 6 May 2026
Viewed by 433
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Renal scintigraphy with 99mTc-MAG3 is a non-invasive tool for assessing early post-kidney-transplant function and detecting complications. While its utility in predicting delayed graft function (DGF) is established, evidence regarding its capacity to predict long-term graft survival remains limited. This study aimed [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Renal scintigraphy with 99mTc-MAG3 is a non-invasive tool for assessing early post-kidney-transplant function and detecting complications. While its utility in predicting delayed graft function (DGF) is established, evidence regarding its capacity to predict long-term graft survival remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate whether early post-transplant scintigraphy provides independent prognostic information for long-term graft survival. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of kidney transplantations performed at a single tertiary-care academic institution (2015–2019). Patients undergoing simultaneous multi-organ transplantation or experiencing complications precluding early scintigraphy were excluded. All included patients underwent 99mTc-MAG3 scintigraphy within 48 h post-transplantation. Renogram curves were categorized using the Heaf and Iversen classification (Grades 1–4). Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to assess death-censored graft survival. The study followed STROBE reporting guidelines. Results: Among the 317 included patients, renogram curves were distributed as follows: Grade 1 (n = 31, 9.8%), Grade 2 (n = 69, 21.8%), Grade 3 (n = 92, 29.0%), and Grade 4 (n = 125, 39.4%). The overall DGF incidence was 25.9%, with rates progressively increasing across the grades: 0% (Grade 1), 4.3% (Grade 2), 16.3% (Grade 3), and 51.2% (Grade 4) (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis adjusting for recipient BMI, donation technique, Kidney Donor Risk Index (KDRI), and DGF, grafts with reduced uptake (Grade 4) demonstrated a significantly higher risk of graft loss compared to those with normal uptake (Grades 1–3 combined) (HR: 3.15; 95% CI: 1.34–7.40; p = 0.008). The mean follow-up was 45.6 months (IQR: 34.5–60). Conclusions: 99mTc-MAG3 scintigraphy performed within 48 h of kidney transplantation provides independent prognostic information for long-term graft survival. The Grade 4 renogram pattern identifies a high-risk subgroup with over threefold increased risk of subsequent graft loss. These findings support the integration of early scintigraphy into post-transplant risk stratification protocols, though prospective validation is warranted. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

33 pages, 2336 KB  
Article
Machine Learning-Assisted FTIR Spectroscopy Analysis of Kidney Preservation Fluids for Delayed Graft Function Risk Stratification
by Luis Ramalhete, Rúben Araújo, Miguel Bigotte Vieira, Emanuel Vigia, Ana Pena, Sofia Carrelha, Cristiana Teixeira, Anibal Ferreira and Cecilia R. C. Calado
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(7), 2762; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15072762 - 6 Apr 2026
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 592
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Delayed graft function (DGF) remains a common early complication after deceased donor kidney transplantation and is challenging to anticipate using routine pre-implant clinical variables alone. We investigated whether high-throughput Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy of static cold storage preservation fluid (not [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Delayed graft function (DGF) remains a common early complication after deceased donor kidney transplantation and is challenging to anticipate using routine pre-implant clinical variables alone. We investigated whether high-throughput Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy of static cold storage preservation fluid (not machine perfusion perfusate) captures biochemical information associated with DGF and warrants further evaluation alongside routine pre-implant clinical predictors. Methods: In this single-center retrospective cohort, we analyzed preservation fluid samples from 56 kidney transplants originating from 49 deceased donors (7 donors contributed two kidneys); DGF occurred in 14/56 (25.0%). Dried-film FTIR spectra were acquired using a plate-based high-throughput accessory, and analyses focused on the fingerprint region (900–1800 cm−1) with prespecified preprocessing and quality control. We developed and compared clinical-only, FTIR-only, and combined predictive models and estimated performance using donor-blinded 5-fold StratifiedGroupKFold cross-validation (grouped by donor code) to prevent leakage across paired kidneys. Results: Donor-blinded discrimination (pooled out-of-fold ROC-AUC) was 0.775 for the clinical-only model, 0.814 for the FTIR-only model, and 0.796 for the combined model; probabilistic accuracy (Brier score; lower is better) was 0.162, 0.194, and 0.177, respectively. Calibration intercepts were negative and slopes were <1, indicating overly extreme risk estimates under strict donor-blinded validation and supporting recalibration prior to deployment. Decision curve analysis suggested a positive net benefit for clinically plausible thresholds. Conclusions: These findings support the feasibility of rapid, low-cost FTIR profiling of routinely available preservation fluid as a proof-of-concept approach for exploratory DGF risk stratification, rather than as a clinically deployable prediction tool. Given the small sample size and the instability of subgroup estimates, the main next steps are external validation in larger multicenter cohorts, prospective workflow studies, and model updating/recalibration. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Nephrology & Urology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 229 KB  
Article
Perioperative Factors Associated with Delayed Graft Function in Adults Undergoing Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation
by Edel Rafael Rodea-Montero, Paulina Millán-Ramos, Luis David Delgadillo-Mora, Ricardo Garcia-Mora and Miguel Ángel Aguayo-Preciado
Anesth. Res. 2026, 3(2), 8; https://doi.org/10.3390/anesthres3020008 - 27 Mar 2026
Viewed by 669
Abstract
Introduction: In adult patients undergoing deceased donor kidney transplantation, anesthesia management impacts graft function and survival and is influenced by various donor and recipient clinical factors. The aim of this study was to describe the perioperative factors and to evaluate their association [...] Read more.
Introduction: In adult patients undergoing deceased donor kidney transplantation, anesthesia management impacts graft function and survival and is influenced by various donor and recipient clinical factors. The aim of this study was to describe the perioperative factors and to evaluate their association with delayed graft function (DGF) during the first seven days after transplantation. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study of adult patients who underwent deceased donor kidney transplantation at a tertiary care hospital from 2022–2023 was performed to evaluate pre-, trans- and postoperative patient’s characteristics. Comparisons or association tests were implemented between patient characteristics grouped by the absence or presence of DGF. In the case of the variables with clinical relevance, univariate and multivariate logistic models were constructed to evaluate the predictive capacity of these variables to predict delayed graft function. Crude and adjusted odds ratio (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each variable. Results: DGF was present in 25/69 (36.23%) patients. The anesthesia time was significantly longer (310.28 vs. 273.55 min; p = 0.043) and the post-transplantation stay was significantly longer (11.04 vs. 8.11 days; p < 0.001) in patients with delayed graft function. In univariable analyses, male sex (p = 0.018), platelet count (p = 0.025), and surgical time (p = 0.062) showed significant or borderline associations with DGF. In the multivariable model, male sex remained independently associated with DGF (adjusted OR 10.64; 95% CI 1.23–92.1; p = 0.031). Platelet count (per 50 × 103 µL increase) demonstrated a borderline inverse association (adjusted OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.32–1.02; p = 0.057). Conclusions: Our results suggest that male sex was independently associated with delayed graft function after deceased donor kidney transplantation, while platelet count showed a borderline association. Full article
12 pages, 1445 KB  
Article
Hypothermic Machine Perfusion Allows Safe Delay in Kidney Transplantation After Cold Storage
by Michal Macech, Tadeusz R. Grochowiecki, Ewa Wojtaszek, Slawomir Nazarewski, Tomasz Glogowski, Andrii Mondryk, Michal S. Proczka, Milena N. Michalska, Jolanta Malyszko and Zbigniew Galazka
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(6), 2173; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15062173 - 12 Mar 2026
Viewed by 805
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Static cold storage (SCS) remains the standard method of kidney preservation. As a referral transplant center, we frequently receive kidneys initially preserved with SCS and subsequently initiate prolonged hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) to extend allocation time and optimize recipient matching. The [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Static cold storage (SCS) remains the standard method of kidney preservation. As a referral transplant center, we frequently receive kidneys initially preserved with SCS and subsequently initiate prolonged hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) to extend allocation time and optimize recipient matching. The clinical impact of this sequential preservation strategy remains incompletely defined. To compare outcomes between kidneys preserved with SCS followed by prolonged HMP (SCS+HMP) and SCS alone. Methods: This single-center retrospective study included 200 adult recipients of kidney transplants from brain-dead donors (67 SCS+HMP; 133 SCS). Outcomes were primary graft non-function (PNF), delayed graft function (DGF), patient and death-censored graft survival, and renal function over 24 months. Univariable and multivariable analyses identified predictors of DGF. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for baseline imbalances. Results: In the SCS+HMP group, grafts underwent a median of 244 min of SCS followed by 1300 min of HMP, resulting in longer total cold ischemia time than SCS alone (1545 vs. 1104 min; p < 0.001). After matching, 51 pairs (n = 102) were analyzed. In the matched cohort, PNF occurred in 2 patients (3.9%) in the SCS+HMP group and 3 patients (5.9%) in the SCS group (p = 1.0). DGF occurred less frequently in the SCS+HMP group than in the SCS group (17.6% vs. 39.2%; p = 0.027). In multivariable Firth penalized logistic regression, HMP was independently associated with lower odds of DGF (OR 0.34; 95% CI 0.13–0.82). During the 24-month follow-up, patient survival, death-censored graft survival, and creatinine trajectories were comparable between groups. Conclusions: Sequential HMP after initial SCS enables extended preservation and was associated with a lower incidence of delayed graft function. This strategy does not compromise patient survival, death-censored graft survival, or renal function at 24 months. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1209 KB  
Article
Association Between Donor Kidney Function and Post-Transplant Graft Function in Deceased-Donor Kidney Transplantation
by Arefeh Sadat Pezeshk, Maximilian Nösser, Leke Wiering, Otajan Bobonov, Kim Tehyung, Brigitta Globke, Paul Viktor Ritschl, Andreas Kahl, Klemens Budde, Mira Choi, Fabian Halleck, Johann Pratschke, Robert Öllinger and Tomasz Dziodzio
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(3), 939; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15030939 - 23 Jan 2026
Viewed by 569
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Donor kidney function measured by glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is widely used as a selection criterion in kidney transplantation (KT). This study addresses the knowledge gap regarding the relationship between donor GFR at organ procurement and graft function in deceased donor KT. [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Donor kidney function measured by glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is widely used as a selection criterion in kidney transplantation (KT). This study addresses the knowledge gap regarding the relationship between donor GFR at organ procurement and graft function in deceased donor KT. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 918 deceased donor KTs and compared donor GFRs at procurement and recipient GFRs after KT at hospital discharge and in the one-year follow-up. The Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formula was used to estimate and compare GFRs. Donor baseline GRF was defined as the last available estimated GRF prior to organ procurement. The Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to estimate recipient and graft survival. Results: The median donor GFR was 92.8 mL/min/1.73 m2, while the median recipient GFR at hospital discharge was 37.5 mL/min/1.73 m2 (−60% to donor baseline, p < 0.001), increasing to 51.4 mL/min/1.73 m2 (+37%, p < 0.001) at one-year follow-up. One-year graft and patient survival rates were 95.3% and 98.1%, respectively. Except for grafts from donors with a GFR < 15 mL/min/1.73 m2 due to acute renal failure that resulted in a significantly higher delayed graft function (DGF) rate and inferior graft survival (71.4%), no correlation was observed between baseline GFRs and DGF occurrence nor graft survival. Conclusions: Excellent results can be achieved in KT with subnormal donor GFR. The decision to refuse a kidney offer for KT should not solely be based on donor GFR. Kidneys from donors with very low GFR (<15 mL/min/1.73 m2) may be transplanted, but our observation is based on a very small sample (n = 7) and should therefore be interpreted with caution, particularly given the associated higher risk of DGF and lower graft survival. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Kidney Transplantation: Challenges, Advances and Lessons Learnt)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 3437 KB  
Article
Early and Mid-Term Results of Solid Organ Transplantation After Circulatory Death: A 4-Year Single Centre Experience
by Antonella Galeone, Marilena Casartelli Liviero, Alex Borin, Rostand Emmanuel Nguefouet Momo, Leonardo Gottin, Francesco Onorati, Irene Maffei, Marco Schiavon, Paolo Persona, Tiziano Menon, Luigino Boschiero, Alessandro Antonelli, Giovanni Battista Luciani and Amedeo Carraro
Medicina 2025, 61(12), 2126; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61122126 - 28 Nov 2025
Viewed by 1130
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The use of controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) donors has significantly increased during the past decades and successfully expanded the donors’ pool. However, warm ischemia may have detrimental effects on graft function. Italian Law requires a no-touch period [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: The use of controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) donors has significantly increased during the past decades and successfully expanded the donors’ pool. However, warm ischemia may have detrimental effects on graft function. Italian Law requires a no-touch period of at least 20 min, which is much longer compared to the 5 min accepted in most European countries. Materials and Methods This is an Italian single-centre retrospective review of all cDCD procedures performed from April 2021 to June 2025. Patients with severe brain injury undergoing withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy (WLST) were considered for cDCD. After cardiac arrest and a no-touch period of 20 min, organ reperfusion was performed using abdominal or thoraco-abdominal normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) through femoral vessels cannulation. The primary endpoint was 30-day graft survival; secondary endpoints included: incidence of primary non-function (PNF) and non-anastomotic biliary stricture (NAS) in liver transplantation, PNF and delayed graft function (DGF) in kidney transplantation, primary graft dysfunction (PGD) in heart and lung transplantation, and recipient’s survival. Results: A total of 52 patients, 33 (63%) males, median age 74 (65–79) years, underwent WLST during the study period and were included in the cDCD program. Median functional warm ischemic time (WIT), total WIT, asystolic phase, and NRP duration were 37 (34–40), 40 (37–42), 24 (23–26), and 192 (166–212) min, respectively. A total of 123 organs (46 livers, 61 kidneys, 8 hearts, and 8 lungs) were considered suitable for transplantation, procured, and successfully transplanted in 115 recipients. We report the early and mid-term outcomes of 84 recipients, including 41 liver recipients, 32 kidney recipients, and 8 heart recipients transplanted at the Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona, and 3 lung recipients transplanted at the Azienda Ospedale Università of Padova. The 30-day graft survival was 95% in liver recipients, 97% in kidney recipients, and 100% in heart and lung recipients. PNF was observed in two liver recipients, and PGD in two lung recipients. DGF was recorded in 3 (9%) kidney recipients. Six recipients died during the follow-up, and the mean survival time was 3.9 ± 0.1 years. Conclusions: Solid organ transplantation using cDCD donors is feasible and provides excellent early and mid-term results despite longer donor asystolic times. Larger data and longer follow-up are necessary to confirm these promising results. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 653 KB  
Article
Absolute Eosinophil Count and Albumin–Globulin Ratio as Predictors of Delayed Graft Function in Deceased Donor Kidney Transplant: A Retrospective Analysis
by Anupam Choudhary, A. V. B. Krishnakanth, K. R. Surag, Kasi Viswanath, Abhijit Shah, Sunil Pillai and Padmaraj Hegde
Kidney Dial. 2025, 5(4), 56; https://doi.org/10.3390/kidneydial5040056 - 17 Nov 2025
Viewed by 1188
Abstract
Background: Delayed graft function (DGF) is a frequent early complication after deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT), leading to prolonged hospitalization, increased risk of acute rejection, and reduced graft survival. Reliable and easily measurable preoperative biomarkers for DGF prediction remain limited. This study aimed [...] Read more.
Background: Delayed graft function (DGF) is a frequent early complication after deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT), leading to prolonged hospitalization, increased risk of acute rejection, and reduced graft survival. Reliable and easily measurable preoperative biomarkers for DGF prediction remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of pre-operative Absolute Eosinophil Count (AEC) and Albumin-to-Globulin Ratio (AGR) for DGF in DDKT recipients. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on all DDKT procedures performed at our institution between January 2018 and December 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (DGF) and Group 2 (non-DGF). DGF was defined as the requirement for hemodialysis within the first seven postoperative days. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data—including pre-operative AEC and AGR—were collected and compared between groups. Statistical analysis was performed using appropriate parametric and nonparametric tests. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to assess the individual and combined predictive performance of AEC and AGR for DGF. Results: A total of 38 patients underwent DDKT, comprising 27 males (71.05%) and 11 females (28.95%), with a mean age of 43.3 ± 9.41 years. Fifteen patients (39.47%) developed DGF. The mean AEC and AGR were significantly lower in the DGF group compared to the non-DGF group (AEC: 0.20 ± 0.16 vs. 0.40 ± 0.35, p = 0.04; AGR: 1.43 ± 0.22 vs. 1.66 ± 0.39, p = 0.02). ROC analysis demonstrated that both AEC (p = 0.04) and AGR (p = 0.04) were significant predictors of DGF. Combining both parameters resulted in a higher area under the curve (AUC), improved sensitivity, and enhanced negative predictive value (NPV) compared to either marker alone. Conclusions: DGF occurred in nearly two-fifths of DDKT recipients in this cohort. Patients with lower preoperative AEC and AGR were more likely to develop DGF, suggesting that these easily available hematological and biochemical indices can serve as potential preoperative predictors of early graft dysfunction. Future multicentric prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings and explore their integration into DGF risk prediction models. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 931 KB  
Article
Uncontrolled Donation After Circulatory Death Kidney Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience in Israel with Propensity-Matched Analysis
by Fahim Kanani, Yael Ben Avraham, Vladimir Tennak, Wadim Mezebovsky, Michael Gurevich, Sigal Eisner, Aviad Gravetz and Eviatar Nesher
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(22), 8068; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14228068 - 14 Nov 2025
Viewed by 841
Abstract
Background: Uncontrolled donation after circulatory death (uDCD) remains underutilized globally, despite critical organ shortages. We report outcomes from Israel’s uDCD kidney transplant program compared with the matched donation after brain death (DBD) recipients. Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed all uDCD kidney transplants [...] Read more.
Background: Uncontrolled donation after circulatory death (uDCD) remains underutilized globally, despite critical organ shortages. We report outcomes from Israel’s uDCD kidney transplant program compared with the matched donation after brain death (DBD) recipients. Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed all uDCD kidney transplants performed at the Rabin Medical Center between January 2018 and December 2024, compared with DBD transplants during the same period. Propensity score matching (1:3 ratio) was performed using recipient demographics, comorbidities, and donor characteristics. Primary outcomes included delayed graft function (DGF), graft failure, and patient survival. Results: Among 92 kidney transplants, 21 (22.8%) were from uDCD donors. After propensity-matching (21 uDCD, 63 DBD), significant baseline differences persisted: uDCD recipients were younger (47.2 ± 11.8 vs. 57.5 ± 10.9 years, p < 0.001) despite a similar dialysis vintage (7.2 ± 3.2 vs. 7.7 ± 3.7 years, p = 0.569). Warm ischemia time was 58.5 ± 12.3 vs. 3.0 ± 0.0 min (p < 0.001), and cold ischemia time was longer in uDCD (13.7 ± 5.9 vs. 8.4 ± 2.5 h, p < 0.001). DGF occurred in 90.5% of uDCD versus 54.1% of DBD recipients (p = 0.006). Graft failure was markedly higher in uDCD (28.6% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.001), yet mortality was lower (14.3% vs. 27.9%, p = 0.339). After a median follow-up of 60 months (IQR 48–72) for both groups, the death-censored 5 year graft survival rate was 71.4% for uDCD versus 98.4% for DBD (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Despite higher rates of DGF and graft failure, uDCD kidney transplantation demonstrated an acceptable 5 year patient survival rate in carefully selected younger recipients. These findings support cautious expansion of uDCD programs with rigorous recipient selection criteria and realistic outcome expectations. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 2834 KB  
Article
Delayed Graft Function and Its Duration as Predictors of Medium-Term Kidney Transplant Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study from an Eastern European Center
by Oana Antal, Tudor Moisoiu, Robert Simon, Alina Daciana Elec, Adriana Milena Muntean, Georgeta Horciag, Florina Maria Gabor Harosa, Vlad Pastor, Horia Iuga and Florin Ioan Elec
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(20), 7240; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14207240 - 14 Oct 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1388
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Delayed graft function (DGF) is a major complication after kidney transplantation, affecting graft and patient survival. Although well-studied in Western populations, data from Eastern Europe are limited, and the prognostic significance of DGF severity, particularly renal replacement therapy (RRT) duration, is not [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Delayed graft function (DGF) is a major complication after kidney transplantation, affecting graft and patient survival. Although well-studied in Western populations, data from Eastern Europe are limited, and the prognostic significance of DGF severity, particularly renal replacement therapy (RRT) duration, is not well-defined. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 479 adult recipients of brain-dead donor (DBD) kidney transplants at a high-volume transplant center in Romania (2017–2024). DGF was defined as the need for dialysis within seven days’ post-transplant. Baseline characteristics, graft function, and survival outcomes were compared between DGF and non-DGF groups. Kidney function was evaluated using the Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR). Patient and graft survival were assessed using Kaplan–Meier curves and log-rank tests. DGF severity was stratified by RRT duration (≤14 vs. >14 days). Results: DGF occurred in 28.8% of patients (adjusted 24%). Those with DGF had a higher Body Mass Index (BMI), greater comorbidity (Charlson Index, Estimated Post-Transplant Survival (EPTS) score), longer pre-transplant dialysis, and higher Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) donor kidneys. DGF was associated with lower graft survival at one, three, and five years and reduced patient survival at three and five years. Longer RRT was associated with progressively worse outcomes, with the poorest prognosis in patients needing >14 days. Conclusions: Delayed graft function was significantly associated with reduced graft and patient survival. Prolonged DGF time was found to be predictive for poorer outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Nephrology & Urology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 539 KB  
Article
Outcomes of Kidney Transplantation from Deceased Donors with Severe Acute Kidney Injury (AKIN Stage 3): A Preliminary Single-Centre Analysis
by Juan A. Encarnación, Elisabeth Coll, Clara Manso, Santiago Llorente, Francisco Morales, Isabel Saura, Pedro López-Cubillana, Pablo Luis Guzman Martínez-Valls, Gloria Martínez, Isabel De la Fuente, Enrique Cárdenas, Jose L. Alonso-Romero, Paula Ruiz, José Moya, Beatriz Domínguez-Gil and Mario Royo-Villanova
Med. Sci. 2025, 13(3), 188; https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci13030188 - 14 Sep 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1975
Abstract
Background: The shortage of donor kidneys has prompted interest in using organs from donors with severe acute kidney injury (AKI), but robust data on outcomes from donors with AKIN stage 3 remain limited. Methods: This single-centre, retrospective cohort study compared outcomes of kidney [...] Read more.
Background: The shortage of donor kidneys has prompted interest in using organs from donors with severe acute kidney injury (AKI), but robust data on outcomes from donors with AKIN stage 3 remain limited. Methods: This single-centre, retrospective cohort study compared outcomes of kidney transplants from deceased donors with AKIN stage 3 AKI to matched non-AKI donors (n = 57 per group; matched by donor age ±5 years, year of transplant, and major cardiovascular risk factors). Primary outcomes were delayed graft function (DGF), death-censored graft survival, and patient survival. Secondary outcomes included renal function at follow-up. Results: DGF occurred in 54.4% (31/57) of AKIN 3 recipients vs. 33.3% (19/57) of non-AKI recipients (risk difference 21.1%, 95% CI 3.1–39.2; p = 0.037). Five-year death-censored graft survival was 94.7% vs. 96.4% (HR 1.28, 95% CI 0.25–6.52; p = 0.645). Five-year patient survival was 84.8% vs. 84.0% (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.30–3.05; p = 0.979). Median follow-up was 32 months. Conclusions: In this preliminary, selected kidneys from AKIN stage 3 donors yielded similar medium-term graft and patient survival to non-AKI donors, despite higher DGF incidence. Findings should be interpreted cautiously and confirmed in adequately powered, multicentre studies with extended follow-up. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Nephrology and Urology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 750 KB  
Article
Risk Factors of Acute Rejection: Impact on Graft Outcomes in a Cohort of Kidney Transplant Recipients
by Valeria Corradetti, Elisa Gessaroli, Federico Bari, Claudia Bini, Valeria Grandinetti, Angelodaniele Napoletano, Vania Cuna, Valeria Pizzuti, Marcello Demetri, Matteo Ravaioli, Michele Provenzano, Gaetano La Manna and Giorgia Comai
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(10), 3373; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14103373 - 12 May 2025
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3198
Abstract
Background: Acute rejection (AR) in kidney transplant (KT) recipients remains a significant challenge for short- and long-term graft survival even in the most recent years characterized by extended criteria donors and older and more comorbid recipients. Methods: We analyzed risk factors [...] Read more.
Background: Acute rejection (AR) in kidney transplant (KT) recipients remains a significant challenge for short- and long-term graft survival even in the most recent years characterized by extended criteria donors and older and more comorbid recipients. Methods: We analyzed risk factors and outcomes of AR in 339 KT recipients treated at St. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna (Italy), between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2021. Demographic, immunological, and transplant data (type, cold ischemia time, complications) were recorded with a follow-up period of up to 24 months. Key outcomes included estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), 24 h proteinuria, delayed graft function (DGF), biopsy-proven AR, and graft loss. Results: During the first year after transplant, 57 AR episodes occurred: 19 antibody-mediated rejections (AMR), 18 borderline T cell-mediated rejections (TCMR), 18 TCMR, 2 mixed AMR/TCMR, and 11 graft losses. AR was linked to older donor age (59.9 ± 12.8 vs. 55.5 ± 15.1, p = 0.040), longer cold ischemia time (690 vs. 570 min, p = 0.044), higher DGF rates (61.40% vs. 39.57%, p = 0.002), and lower eGFR (39 vs. 52 mL/min, p = 0.003). AR was consistently prevalent in patients who underwent an AB0-incompatible (AB0-i) transplant (8.8% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.020). HLA matching was strongly associated with a reduced risk of AMR (HLA-DR: OR 0.35, HLA-A: OR 0.33, HLA-C: OR 0.35), while DGF was linked to a higher risk (OR 4.04). TCMR risk was associated with donor age (OR 1.05). The development of post-transplant donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) at 24 months showed no significant association with AR (AMR: p = 0.769; TCMR: p = 0.938). The decline in eGFR over time (24 months) did not differ between patients with and without AR (difference, −0.69 mL/min/year; Standard Error, 0.92; p = 0.452). Similarly, 24 h proteinuria change over time did not differ between patients with and without AR (difference, −0.12 g/24 h; Standard Error, 0.28; p = 0.657). Conclusions: Understanding the risk factors of AR is crucial to identifying KTs at more risk of rejection and to guiding targeted therapeutic decisions. In the most recent era of extended criteria donors and more vulnerable recipients, early diagnosis and prompt and tailored treatment of AR play a critical role in stabilizing renal function over time. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Practice and Personalized Medicine in Kidney Transplantation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 1956 KB  
Article
The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathway Is Safe, Feasible and Cost-Effective in Delayed Graft Function After Kidney Transplant
by Francesca Romano, Roberta Angelico, Luca Toti, Michela Orsi, Valentina Enrica Marsella, Tommaso Maria Manzia, Leonardo Emberti Gialloreti and Giuseppe Tisone
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(7), 2387; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14072387 - 31 Mar 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2003
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways are still underutilized in kidney transplantation (KT), and their feasibility after delayed graft function (DGF) is unknown. We aimed to evaluate safety and cost savings after ERAS implementation in KT recipients with DGF. Methods: A retrospective [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways are still underutilized in kidney transplantation (KT), and their feasibility after delayed graft function (DGF) is unknown. We aimed to evaluate safety and cost savings after ERAS implementation in KT recipients with DGF. Methods: A retrospective analysis of KT recipients enrolled in the ERAS program with DGF (≥1 dialytic treatment during the first postoperative week or creatinine≥ 2.5 mg/dL on postoperative day 10) between 2010 and 2019 was performed. Recipient, donor, and transplant data, outcomes, and 1-year post-KT costs were collected, comparing recipients within the ERAS target (≤5 days, “early discharge group”) to those discharged later (>5 days, “late discharge group”). Results: Out of 170 KT recipients with DGF, 33 (19.4%) were in the “early discharge group” and 137 (80.5%) in the “late discharge group”. Recipient, donor, and transplant characteristics were similar in the two groups. The length of hospital stay (LOS) of the “early discharge group” was significantly shorter, with fewer in-hospital dialysis sessions (p < 0.001) compared to the “late discharge group”. One year post-KT, no significant differences were observed in postoperative complications, readmissions, or number of outpatient visits. Five-year graft and patient survival along with five-year graft function were similar between the two cohorts. First-year costs were significantly higher in the “late discharge group” (p < 0.001), with a median excess cost (Δ) of EUR 4515.76/patient. Factors influencing first-year costs post-KT were LOS for KT, recipient age, and use of expanded-criteria grafts. Conclusions: The ERAS approach is safe in KT recipients with DGF and allows for economic savings, while its implementation does not cause worse clinical outcomes in recipients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Kidney Transplantation: Current Challenges and Future Perspectives)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

9 pages, 736 KB  
Article
Comparative Analysis Between Insulated Gel Bags and Direct Cooling for Temperature Management During Kidney Transplant Vascular Anastomosis
by Yuichi Machida, Tomoaki Iwai, Kazuya Kabei and Junji Uchida
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(7), 2368; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14072368 - 29 Mar 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1117
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Ischemic time plays a crucial role in graft function and survival during kidney transplantation. Cooling methods, including cold perfusion and ice slush, are predominantly applied to preserve the kidney, but they may cause uneven cooling and complications. The Organ Pocket®, [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Ischemic time plays a crucial role in graft function and survival during kidney transplantation. Cooling methods, including cold perfusion and ice slush, are predominantly applied to preserve the kidney, but they may cause uneven cooling and complications. The Organ Pocket®, an insulated gel bag, has been introduced as an alternative cooling method. However, no studies have compared renal temperature changes between the Organ Pocket® and conventional cooling methods. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 49 cases of living-donor kidney transplantation. Among these, 33 received kidney grafts preserved with the Organ Pocket® (OP group), and 16 underwent conventional cooling (control group). Renal surface temperatures were recorded at 5 min intervals during vascular anastomosis using thermography. Postoperative renal function was assessed with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), serum creatinine (sCr), and liver-type fatty acid-binding protein (L-FABP) levels. Results: The OP group demonstrated significantly higher renal surface temperatures than the control group during vascular anastomosis (p < 0.05). Renal surface temperature before reperfusion was 20.4 °C ± 2.5 °C and 17.2 °C ± 2.5 °C in the OP and control groups, respectively. No significant differences in postoperative eGFR, sCr, and L-FABP levels; delayed graft function (DGF); or acute rejection rates were observed between the groups. Conclusions: The Organ Pocket® effectively stabilized renal temperatures during vascular anastomosis without direct cooling, thereby reducing continuous manual cooling requirements. Short-term renal function outcomes were comparable between groups; however, the Organ Pocket® may improve surgical efficiency and be particularly beneficial in robot-assisted kidney transplantation. Further studies are warranted to investigate its long-term benefits. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustaining Success Through Innovation in Kidney Transplantation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop