Search Results (121)

Background/Objectives: Left/right discrimination (LRD) training is increasingly being used in the treatment of chronic low back pain (CLBP). However, it is unclear whether trunk LRD-performance is impaired in CLBP patients and whether clinical parameters are related to LRD-performance. Therefore, this cross-sectional study aimed to examine (1) whether LRD-performance differs between CLBP patients and pain-free individuals; (2) whether these differences depend on the low back pain (LBP) history in pain-free individuals; (3) if clinical factors are related to LRD-performance; (4) whether LRD-task difficulty influences these results. Methods: Participants included 150 pain-free persons (107 with no LBP-history; 43 with past LBP) and 150 patients with CLBP. All participants performed the LRD-task in a simple and complex condition. Outcomes were reaction time and accuracy. Results: CLBP patients were significantly slower (Cohen’s d = 0.47 to 0.50, p < 0.001) and less accurate (Cohen’s d = 0.30 to 0.55, p < 0.001) than pain-free individuals without LBP-history, but not compared to those with past LBP (Cohen’s d reaction time = 0.07 to 0.15, p = 0.55; Cohen’s d accuracy = 0.03 to 0.28, p-value = 0.28). All participant groups were slower and less accurate in the complex condition, but between-groups differences were independent of task difficulty. Linear mixed models showed that older age and lower education were independently associated with less accuracy. When controlling for demographics, pain intensity, disability, fear of movement, pain-related worry and pain duration were not related to LRD-performance in patients with CLBP. Conclusions: Patients with CLBP showed impaired trunk LRD-performance compared to pain-free persons without LBP history, but not compared to those with past LBP. When controlling for demographics, clinical parameters were not related to LRD-performance in patients with CLBP. Our findings indicate that LRD-performance may remain impaired after recovering from LBP. Full article

Background/Objectives: Manual therapy techniques, including mobilization and manipulation, are commonly used for chronic low back pain (CLBP), with clinical guidelines recommending their use. This study aimed to compare the immediate hypoalgesic effects of mobilization and manipulation in patients with non-specific CLBP, evaluating their impact on pain sensitivity and range of motion. Methods: A cross-over randomized controlled trial was conducted with 27 participants with non-specific CLBP. Participants received either mobilization or manipulation on two different intervention days. Outcome measures included pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) assessed with a digital algometer, pain intensity using a numeric rating scale, and lumbar range of motion (ROM) measured with a digital inclinometer. Results: The results indicated no statistically significant differences between mobilization and manipulation for any outcome measures (all p > 0.05). However, significant within-intervention improvements were observed, including pain reduction, increased PPTs, and enhanced ROM of the lower back. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that both mobilization and manipulation provide similar immediate benefits for patients with CLBP. The choice between these techniques should be based on therapists’ clinical reasoning and individualized risk stratification, considering the potential benefits and risks of each approach for a specific patient. Full article

Background: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is the leading cause of disability both within the United States and globally. However, reliable diagnosis and treatment remains limited due to a lack of objective and image-based biomarkers. Modic changes (MCs) are visible vertebral endplate and bone marrow changes in signal intensity seen on MRI. MCs have emerged as promising correlates with degenerative disc disease and CLBP. Methods: This is a non-systematic literature review. Results: This review synthesizes current evidence on the classification, pathophysiology, and imaging of MCs, with a particular focus on their associations with patient-reported outcomes, including pain (Visual Analog Scale), functional status (Oswestry disability index and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire), and health-related quality of life (Short Form-36 and EuroQol 5-Dimension 5 Level). MC type 1 and 2 show significant correlations with symptom severity and predict positive response to basi-vertebral nerve (BVN) ablation, a minimally invasive intervention inhibiting the nerves’ ability to transmit pain signals. Conclusions: Across multiple trials, BVN ablation has shown significant sustained improvements in patient-reported outcomes among patients with MC, reinforcing their role as both a diagnostic and therapeutic biomarker. Full article

Background: Severe scoliosis can lead to chronic low back pain (cLBP) and may progress in adulthood. While day-time bracing is commonly used to alleviate pain and improve function, the role of night-time bracing remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the six-month effectiveness of a custom-made night-time brace in reducing pain in adults with scoliosis, compared to a prefabricated brace worn for 2–4 h during the day. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary outpatient clinic specializing in spinal deformities. Adults with scoliosis (≥30° Cobb) and cLBP were divided into two groups: the study group used a custom-made night-time thoracolumbosacral orthosis (TLSO), while the control group wore a prefabricated brace (Peak) for 2–4 h daily. Pain and functional outcomes were assessed at baseline and after six months. Results: The study group included 25 women (mean age, 62.3 ± 9.5 years; Cobb angle, 60.4 ± 17.7°) who wore the night-time brace for an average of 7.2 ± 2.2 h per night. The control group comprised 20 women (mean age, 67.8 ± 10.5 years; Cobb angle, 61.9 ± 12.6°). At six months, the worst pain significantly improved in the TLSO group compared to the Peak group (F = 6.32, p = 0.0158). However, no statistically significant differences were observed between groups for back pain, leg pain, Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI), or Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Conclusions: Night-time bracing shows interesting results on pain at six months in adults with severe scoliosis and back pain. These preliminary results open a new perspective that needs further verification and will help design more robust studies to verify what we found and identify the population more responsive to this approach. Full article

Background/Objectives: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a prevalent condition that significantly impacts the aging population. Among non-invasive assessment tools, infrared thermography (IRT) has been highlighted as a radiation-free method to evaluate thermal variations in the lumbar region. However, its applicability in clinical practice and correlation with functional and pain-related parameters remain unclear. This study aimed to analyze the thermal profile of the lumbar region in elderly individuals with CLBP and explore potential correlations between lumbar temperature patterns and clinical factors such as pain intensity and functional capacity. Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was performed in an outpatient setting. The population included thirty-one elderly individuals diagnosed with CLBP. IRT was used to assess the lumbar temperature distribution, including participants who reported pain radiating to the lower limbs. Pain intensity was measured using a numerical rating scale (0–10). The functional assessments included spine mobility tests and validated questionnaires evaluating clinical characteristics. Results: No significant differences in lumbar temperature patterns were observed among the participants. Additionally, no correlation was found between pain intensity and functional capacity based on a thermographic analysis. Nonetheless, individuals reporting lower fatigue levels and those with a higher body mass index (BMI) were generally associated with cooler thermal readings on the lumbar region’s thermographic maps. Conclusions: These findings suggest that IRT may require methodological refinements, including optimized technical specifications and image acquisition protocols, to enhance its applicability in assessing CLBP. Indeed, IRT might not be the most effective tool for evaluating pain-related thermal changes in elderly populations. Further research is needed to clarify its role in clinical assessments. Full article

Introduction: Chronic pain which tends to be localised particularly in the lower back and lower extremities is one of the risk factors for elevated blood pressure (BP). In this cross-sectional study, we evaluated whether chronic low back pain (cLBP) is associated with BP variability, which may be related to increased mortality and morbidity. Methods: We included 85 consecutive hypertensive patients with a median age of 62 years (IQR, 55–67) with cLBP, for which intensity was assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) was performed to evaluate the values and variability of systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) over 24 h, day- and nighttime BP variability assessed as BP standard deviation (SD). Results: In the whole study population, the median ODI questionnaire score was 16 (IQR, 11–20). Patients with an equal/higher than median ODI score had lower nighttime DBP compared with other patients (p = 0.028). Equal/higher than median ODI score correlated with 24 h SD values for SBP and MAP (r = 0.263; p = 0.016, and r = 0.229; p = 0.036, respectively), as well as with day–night differences in SBP (r = 0.229; p = 0.035), DBP (r = 0.253; p = 0.019), and MAP (r = 0.263; p = 0.015). We performed a multivariate regression analysis adjusted for potential confounders, and equal/higher than median ODI score was predicted by age (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.006–1.14; p = 0.031) and day–night DBP difference (OR 1.07; 95% CI 1.002–1.15; p = 0.044). Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study to show that more intense cLBP is associated with BP variability among patients with hypertension. Full article

Background: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a leading cause of disability, impacting quality of life (QoL), function, and work productivity. Traditional rehabilitation faces challenges in accessibility and adherence. Remote rehabilitation and virtual reality (VR) interventions using motion sensors offer real-time movement tracking, biofeedback, and personalized exercises. This systematic review evaluates their effectiveness in pain reduction, functional improvement, adherence, and QoL. Methods: A systematic search was performed across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and PEDro (2015–2025), including randomized controlled trials, observational, and feasibility studies on adults with CLBP undergoing sensor-based digital rehabilitation. The primary outcomes included pain, functional mobility, and movement biomechanics; secondary outcomes included adherence, QoL, and cost-effectiveness. Eight studies involving 7166 participants were included. Overall, sensor-based remote rehabilitation and VR interventions demonstrated positive effects on pain, function, and adherence. Pain reductions ranged from modest short-term decreases to over 60% in long-term programs (e.g., −68.5% in VAS). Functional improvements included lumbar ROM gains up to +9.9° and better movement control. Adherence was consistently high, with some programs reporting completion rates between 73% and 90%, particularly those incorporating gamification or real-time feedback. Selected studies also showed QoL improvements (e.g., +9.10 points on SF-36) and reductions in work impairment by over 60%. A few trials reported significant decreases in inflammatory markers (e.g., CRP −1.16 mg/L, TNF-α −8.9 pg/mL). Conclusions: Motion sensor-based remote rehabilitation and VR interventions show promising results in pain management, mobility, and adherence for individuals with CLBP. Gamification and biofeedback features enhance engagement, addressing a key challenge of conventional rehabilitation. However, more long-term RCTs and economic evaluations are needed to confirm their effectiveness and cost-efficiency. Full article

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) significantly impacts individuals’ quality of life and functional abilities. In non-oncological settings, CLBP is often treated for long periods using pharmacotherapy. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of pharmacological treatments for CLBP, detailing their mechanisms of action, adverse effects, and evidence supporting their use. We discuss various medication classes, including NSAIDs, acetaminophen, antidepressants, gabapentinoids, tramadol, major opioids, corticosteroids, antispasticity drugs, benzodiazepines, and antibiotics. Special emphasis is given to the opioid crisis, examining its history, the pathophysiology of opioid tolerance and dependence, the need for cautious opioid use, the key challenges in treatment and emerging medications for CLBP. We also share insights from our experiences with polypharmacy, commonly seen in CLBP patients, at a specialized pain centre in Belgium. Full article

Background/Objectives: This study aimed to create a pipeline for standardized data extraction from lumbar-spine MRI radiology reports using a large language model (LLM) and assess the agreement of the extracted data with research-grade semi-quantitative scoring. Methods: We included a subset of data from a multi-site NIH-funded cohort study of chronic low back pain (cLBP) participants. After initial prompt development, a secure application programming interface (API) deployment of OpenAIs GPT-4 was used to extract different classes of pathology from the clinical radiology report. Unsupervised UMAP and agglomerative clustering of the pathology terms’ embeddings provided insight into model comprehension for optimized prompt design. Model extraction was benchmarked against human extraction (gold standard) with F1 scores and false-positive and false-negative rates (FPR/FNR). Then, an expert MSK radiologist provided comprehensive research-grade scores of the images, and agreement with report-extracted data was calculated using Cohen’s kappa. Results: Data from 230 patients with cLBP were included (mean age 53.2 years, 54% women). The overall model performance for extracting data from clinical reports was excellent, with a mean F1 score of 0.96 across pathologies. The mean FPR was marginally higher than the FNR (5.1% vs. 3.0%). Agreement with comprehensive scoring was moderate (kappa 0.424), and the underreporting of lateral recess stenosis (FNR 63.6%) and overreporting of disc pathology (FPR 42.7%) were noted. Conclusions: LLMs can accurately extract highly detailed information on lumbar spine imaging pathologies from radiology reports. Moderate agreement between the LLM and comprehensive scores underscores the need for less subjective, machine-based data extraction from imaging. Full article

Background/Objectives: We present a case documenting the successful treatment for a patient with chronic low back pain (CLBP), chronic neck pain (CNP), and decreased quality of life improving after conservative therapy. CLBP has been the leading cause of disability globally for the past few decades, resulting in decreased quality of life physically and emotionally. This case is important in the medical literature to add to studies reporting successful conservative treatment of CLBP and CNP. Triage, diagnosis, and understanding of economical and conservative therapeutics can benefit patients; providers as well as institutions and third party payors benefit from improved outcomes. Methods: A 39-year old male presented with severe CLBP who had experienced no long-term success with prior chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy (SMT). After symptoms began to worsen in spite of receiving SMT, the patient sought treatment for his pain, abnormal spine alignment, and poor sagittal alignment at a local spine facility. History and physical examination demonstrated altered spine and postural alignment including significant forward head posture and reduced cervical and lumbar lordosis and coronal plane abnormalities. Treatment consisted of a multi-modal regimen focused on strengthening postural muscles, specific spine manipulation directed toward abnormal full-spine alignment, and specific Mirror Image® traction aiming to improve spine integrity by realigning the spine toward a more normal position. The treatment consisted of 36 treatments over three months. All original tests and outcome measures were repeated following care. Results: Objective and subjective outcome measures, patient-reported outcomes, and radiographic mensuration demonstrated improvement at the conclusion of treatment and maintained at 1-year follow-up re-examination. Conclusions: This case demonstrates that the CBP^® orthopedic chiropractic treatment approach may represent an effective method to treat abnormal spinal alignment and posture. This study adds to the literature regarding conservative methods of treating spine pain and spinal disorders. Full article

Background: Although previous studies have suggested a variety of sociodemographic and psychological factors as predictors of poor outcomes in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP), longitudinal studies remain rare. Objectives: To examine the prognostic indicators for poor outcome at 6 months on pain, disability, quality of life, anxiety, depression and somatic symptom disorders (SSDs) in Greek backache patients and to evaluate the medium-term effects of a conservative physiotherapeutic approach (massage, ultrasound, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, low-level laser and exercise program). Methods: A prospective cohort study of 145 volunteers receiving treatment for CLBP in a physiotherapy unit was conducted using random systematic sampling. The intervention was assessed by comparing pre-treatment, post-treatment and six-month measurements with Friedman’s test and the Bonferroni correction, using the pain numerical rating scale (PNRS), Roland–Morris disability questionnaire (RMDQ), EuroQol-5-dimension-5-level (EQ-5D-5L), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Somatic Symptom Scale-8 (SSS-8). Multiple linear regression analysis was carried out to determine the impact of demographics and pre-treatment scores with scores at six months. Results: The mean age was 60.6 years (±14.7). Post-treatment, statistically significant improvements were observed across all outcome measures, including PNRS, RMDQ, EQ-5D-5L and SSS-8 (all p ≤ 0.001), with anxiety showing a notable reduction (p = 0.002). After examining the multiple regression analysis, pre-treatment SSS-8 emerged as a predictor of elevated levels of pain, disability, anxiety and depression at 6 months. Conclusions: The findings yielded not only somatic symptom burden, greater age and pain intensity as prognostic indicators for poor outcomes at six months, but also reported favorable medium-term effects for a conventional physiotherapy regimen in CLBP management, as well. Full article

Chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNSLBP) might be associated with increased pain sensitivity and inflammation. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) has been suggested to reduce pain outcomes and inflammatory markers, but its effects compared to moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the acute effects of HIIT on pain sensitivity and inflammatory markers in persons with CNSLBP compared to healthy controls (HCs) and to determine how these effects differ from MICT. Twenty persons with CNSLBP and twenty HCs were assessed before (PRE) and after (POST) a single HIIT and MICT protocol for pain sensitivity (cuff pressure pain threshold (cPPT), temporal summation of pain (TS), conditioned pain modulation (CPM)), and inflammatory markers (IL-6, TNF-α). Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVAs, paired t-tests, and correlation analyses. At PRE, persons with CNSLBP exhibited lower cPPT (28.2 ± 7.1, Δ = −5.5, p = 0.040), higher TS (1.11 ± 0.89, Δ = 0.79, p = 0.042), and lower CPM (36.2 ± 11.6, Δ = −10.0, p = 0.023) compared to HCs. HIIT resulted in PRE–POST improvements in cPPT (38.9 ± 12.6, Δ = 5.2, p = 0.019) in HCs. No PRE–POST differences were observed in pain processing in those with CLBP. No PRE or PRE–POST differences were observed in the inflammatory markers in either group. The current exploratory study suggests that a single HIIT session might have a beneficial effect on pain sensitivity in HCs but does not alter acute pain sensitivity or inflammatory markers in persons with CNSLBP. Further research is needed to clarify the involved mechanisms and explore the (relation with the) long-term effects of HIIT. Full article

Background: Both transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and acupuncture are promising methods for managing chronic low back pain (cLBP), however, their underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Methods: To explore the neural mechanisms of tDCS and acupuncture on cLBP, we examined how real and sham tDCS applied to the bilateral motor cortex (M1), combined with real or sham acupuncture, influenced cerebral blood flow (CBF) using pulsed continuous arterial spin labeling (pCASL) imaging. tDCS was administered over six sessions, combined with real or sham acupuncture, over one month. Results: Following real tDCS, we observed increased CBF in the bilateral occipital cortex, precuneus, left hippocampus, and parahippocampal gyrus/posterior cingulate cortex. After sham tDCS, CBF decreased in regions including the bilateral superior parietal lobule, precuneus, bilateral precentral and postcentral gyri, and left angular gyrus. Real acupuncture led to reduced CBF in the bilateral occipital cortex and hippocampus, and left posterior cingulate gyrus, and increased CBF in the right postcentral gyrus, superior parietal lobule, and frontal areas. Sham acupuncture was associated with decreased CBF in the bilateral hippocampus and anterior cingulate gyrus. Conclusions: These results suggest both shared and distinct patterns of CBF changes between real and sham tDCS, as well as between real and sham acupuncture, reflecting mode-dependent effects on brain networks involved in pain processing and modulation. Our findings highlight the different neural circuits implicated in the therapeutic mechanisms of tDCS and acupuncture in the management of cLBP. Full article

Background: Chronic pain has been reported as one of the leading causes of disability in the world, being associated with a potential impact on autonomic balance. Objective: The aim was to compare sympathetic and parasympathetic activity through heart rate variability (HRV) between adults with and without chronic low back pain (CLBP). Methods: An observational study was conducted in which HRV parameters were recorded using time-domain measures—root mean square of successive differences between consecutive RR intervals (rMSSD), minimum and maximum heart rate variability (Min HR and Max HR), and mean heart rate (Mean HR)—and nonlinear measures—Poincaré plot indices SD1 and SD2, Stress Score (SS), and sympathetic/parasympathetic ratio (S:PS). Results: The results showed statistically significant differences between groups (p < 0.05), with higher parasympathetic activity parameters in the group of healthy subjects (rMSSD: p < 0.001; SD1: p = 0.030) and higher sympathetic activity in the CLBP group (SD2, SS, and S:PS ratio: p < 0.001). All parameters showed large effect sizes. Conclusions: These findings show the association between autonomic balance mechanisms and pain regulation in adults with CLBP. Full article

Chronic low back pain (cLBP) lacks clear physiological explanations, and the treatment options are of limited effect. We aimed to elucidate the underlying biology of cLBP in a subgroup of patients with Modic changes type I (suggestive of inflammatory vertebral bone marrow lesions) by correlating gene expression in blood with patient-reported outcomes on disability and pain intensity and explore sex differences. Patients were included from the placebo group of a clinical study on patients with cLBP and Modic changes. Blood was collected at the time of inclusion, after three months, and after one year, and gene expression was measured at all time points by high-throughput RNA sequencing. The patients reported disability using the Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire, and pain intensity was assessed as a mean of three scores on a 0–10 numeric rating scale: current LBP, worst LBP within the last two weeks, and mean LBP within the last two weeks. The gene expression profiles were then correlated to the reported outcomes. Changes in gene expression over time correlated significantly with changes in both disability and pain. The findings showed distinct patterns in men and women, with negligible overlap in correlated genes between the sexes. The genes involved were enriched in immunological pathways, particularly T cell receptor complex and immune responses related to neutrophils. Several of the genes harbour polymorphisms that previously have been found to be associated with chronic pain. Taken together, our results indicate gender differences in the underlying biology of disability and pain intensity in patients with low back pain. Full article