Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (36)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = biofilm matrix protection mechanisms

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
24 pages, 957 KiB  
Review
Biofilm and Antimicrobial Resistance: Mechanisms, Implications, and Emerging Solutions
by Bharmjeet Singh, Manju Dahiya, Vikram Kumar, Archana Ayyagari, Deepti N. Chaudhari and Jayesh J. Ahire
Microbiol. Res. 2025, 16(8), 183; https://doi.org/10.3390/microbiolres16080183 - 6 Aug 2025
Abstract
Biofilms are a spontaneously formed slimy matrix of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) enveloping miniature bacterial colonies, which aid in pathogen colonization, shielding the bacteria from antibiotics, as well as imparting them resistance towards the same. Biofilms employ a robust communication mechanism called quorum [...] Read more.
Biofilms are a spontaneously formed slimy matrix of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) enveloping miniature bacterial colonies, which aid in pathogen colonization, shielding the bacteria from antibiotics, as well as imparting them resistance towards the same. Biofilms employ a robust communication mechanism called quorum sensing that serves to keep their population density constant. What is most significant about biofilms is that they contribute to the development of bacterial virulence by providing protection to pathogenic species, allowing them to colonize the host, and also inhibiting the activities of antimicrobials on them. They grow on animate surfaces (such as on teeth and intestinal mucosa, etc.) and inanimate objects (like catheters, contact lenses, pacemakers, endotracheal devices, intrauterine devices, and stents, etc.) alike. It has been reported that as much as 80% of human infections involve biofilms. Serious implications of biofilms include the necessity of greater concentrations of antibiotics to treat common human infections, even contributing to antimicrobial resistance (AMR), since bacteria embedded within biofilms are protected from the action of potential antibiotics. This review explores various contemporary strategies for controlling biofilms, focusing on their modes of action, mechanisms of drug resistance, and innovative approaches to find a solution in this regard. This review interestingly targets the extracellular polymeric matrix as a highly effective strategy to counteract the potential harm of biofilms since it plays a critical role in biofilm formation and significantly contributes to antimicrobial resistance. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

52 pages, 8144 KiB  
Review
Multiple Strategies for the Application of Medicinal Plant-Derived Bioactive Compounds in Controlling Microbial Biofilm and Virulence Properties
by Mulugeta Mulat, Riza Jane S. Banicod, Nazia Tabassum, Aqib Javaid, Abirami Karthikeyan, Geum-Jae Jeong, Young-Mog Kim, Won-Kyo Jung and Fazlurrahman Khan
Antibiotics 2025, 14(6), 555; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14060555 - 29 May 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 963
Abstract
Biofilms are complex microbial communities encased within a self-produced extracellular matrix, which plays a critical role in chronic infections and antimicrobial resistance. These enhance pathogen survival and virulence by protecting against host immune defenses and conventional antimicrobial treatments, posing substantial challenges in clinical [...] Read more.
Biofilms are complex microbial communities encased within a self-produced extracellular matrix, which plays a critical role in chronic infections and antimicrobial resistance. These enhance pathogen survival and virulence by protecting against host immune defenses and conventional antimicrobial treatments, posing substantial challenges in clinical contexts such as device-associated infections and chronic wounds. Secondary metabolites derived from medicinal plants, such as alkaloids, tannins, flavonoids, phenolic acids, and essential oils, have gained attention as promising agents against biofilm formation, microbial virulence, and antibiotic resistance. These natural compounds not only limit microbial growth and biofilm development but also disrupt communication between bacteria, known as quorum sensing, which reduces their ability to cause disease. Through progress in nanotechnology, various nanocarriers such as lipid-based systems, polymeric nanoparticles, and metal nanoparticles have been developed to improve the solubility, stability, and cellular uptake of phytochemicals. In addition, the synergistic use of plant-based metabolites with conventional antibiotics or antifungal drugs has shown promise in tackling drug-resistant microorganisms and revitalizing existing drugs. This review comprehensively discusses the efficacy of pure secondary metabolites from medicinal plants, both as individuals and in nanoformulated forms or in combination with antimicrobial agents, as alternative strategies to control biofilm-forming pathogens. The molecular mechanisms underlying their antibiofilm and antivirulence activities are discussed in detail. Lastly, the current pitfalls, limitations, and emerging directions in translating these natural compounds into clinical applications are critically evaluated. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1692 KiB  
Article
Klebsiella Lytic Phages Induce Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 Biofilm Formation
by Grzegorz Guła, Grazyna Majkowska-Skrobek, Anna Misterkiewicz, Weronika Salwińska, Tomasz Piasecki and Zuzanna Drulis-Kawa
Viruses 2025, 17(5), 615; https://doi.org/10.3390/v17050615 - 25 Apr 2025
Viewed by 730
Abstract
Bacterial biofilms, characterized by complex structures, molecular communication, adaptability to environmental changes, insensitivity to chemicals, and immune response, pose a big problem both in clinics and in everyday life. The increasing bacterial resistance to antibiotics also led to the exploration of lytic bacteriophages [...] Read more.
Bacterial biofilms, characterized by complex structures, molecular communication, adaptability to environmental changes, insensitivity to chemicals, and immune response, pose a big problem both in clinics and in everyday life. The increasing bacterial resistance to antibiotics also led to the exploration of lytic bacteriophages as alternatives. Nevertheless, bacteria have co-evolved with phages, developing effective antiviral strategies, notably modification or masking phage receptors as the first line of defense mechanism. This study investigates viral–host interactions between non-host-specific phages and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, assessing whether bacteria can detect phage particles and initiate protective mechanisms. Using real-time biofilm monitoring via impedance and optical density techniques, we monitored the phage effects on biofilm and planktonic populations. Three Klebsiella phages, Slopekvirus KP15, Drulisvirus KP34, and Webervirus KP36, were tested against the P. aeruginosa PAO1 population, as well as Pseudomonas Pbunavirus KTN6. The results indicated that Klebsiella phages (non-specific to P. aeruginosa), particularly podovirus KP34, accelerated biofilm formation without affecting planktonic cultures. Our hypothesis suggests that bacteria sense phage virions, regardless of specificity, triggering biofilm matrix formation to block potential phage adsorption and infection. Nevertheless, further research is needed to understand the ecological and evolutionary dynamics between phages and bacteria, which is crucial for developing novel antibiofilm therapies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bacteriophages and Biofilms 2.0)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

35 pages, 4197 KiB  
Review
New Insights in Natural Bioactive Compounds for Periodontal Disease: Advanced Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Potential
by Nada Tawfig Hashim, Rasha Babiker, Nallan C. S. K. Chaitanya, Riham Mohammed, Sivan Padma Priya, Vivek Padmanabhan, Ayman Ahmed, Shahista Parveen Dasnadi, Md Sofiqul Islam, Bakri Gobara Gismalla and Muhammed Mustahsen Rahman
Molecules 2025, 30(4), 807; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30040807 - 10 Feb 2025
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3183
Abstract
Periodontal disease is a chronic inflammatory condition that destroys the tooth-supporting structures due to the host’s immune response to microbial biofilms. Traditional periodontal treatments, such as scaling and root planing, pharmacological interventions, and surgical procedures, have significant limitations, including difficulty accessing deep periodontal [...] Read more.
Periodontal disease is a chronic inflammatory condition that destroys the tooth-supporting structures due to the host’s immune response to microbial biofilms. Traditional periodontal treatments, such as scaling and root planing, pharmacological interventions, and surgical procedures, have significant limitations, including difficulty accessing deep periodontal pockets, biofilm recolonization, and the development of antibiotic resistance. In light of these challenges, natural bioactive compounds derived from plants, herbs, and other natural sources offer a promising alternative due to their anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antimicrobial, and tissue-regenerative properties. This review focuses on the molecular mechanisms through which bioactive compounds, such as curcumin, resveratrol, epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), baicalin, carvacrol, berberine, essential oils, and Gum Arabic, exert therapeutic effects in periodontal disease. Bioactive compounds inhibit critical inflammatory pathways like NF-κB, JAK/STAT, and MAPK while activating protective pathways such as Nrf2/ARE, reducing cytokine production and oxidative stress. They also inhibit the activity of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), preventing tissue degradation and promoting healing. In addition, these compounds have demonstrated the potential to disrupt bacterial biofilms by interfering with quorum sensing, targeting bacterial cell membranes, and enhancing antibiotic efficacy.Bioactive compounds also modulate the immune system by shifting the balance from pro-inflammatory to anti-inflammatory responses and promoting efferocytosis, which helps resolve inflammation and supports tissue regeneration. However, despite the promising potential of these compounds, challenges related to their poor bioavailability, stability in the oral cavity, and the absence of large-scale clinical trials need to be addressed. Future strategies should prioritize the development of advanced delivery systems like nanoparticles and hydrogels to enhance bioavailability and sustain release, alongside long-term studies to assess the effects of these compounds in human populations. Furthermore, combining bioactive compounds with traditional treatments could provide synergistic benefits in managing periodontal disease. This review aims to explore the therapeutic potential of natural bioactive compounds in managing periodontal disease, emphasizing their molecular mechanisms of action and offering insights into their integration with conventional therapies for a more comprehensive approach to periodontal health. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomanufacturing of Natural Bioactive Compounds)
Show Figures

Figure 1

48 pages, 1664 KiB  
Review
Biofilm Resilience: Molecular Mechanisms Driving Antibiotic Resistance in Clinical Contexts
by Ahmad Almatroudi
Biology 2025, 14(2), 165; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14020165 - 6 Feb 2025
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 5746
Abstract
Healthcare-associated infections pose a significant global health challenge, negatively impacting patient outcomes and burdening healthcare systems. A major contributing factor to healthcare-associated infections is the formation of biofilms, structured microbial communities encased in a self-produced extracellular polymeric substance matrix. Biofilms are critical in [...] Read more.
Healthcare-associated infections pose a significant global health challenge, negatively impacting patient outcomes and burdening healthcare systems. A major contributing factor to healthcare-associated infections is the formation of biofilms, structured microbial communities encased in a self-produced extracellular polymeric substance matrix. Biofilms are critical in disease etiology and antibiotic resistance, complicating treatment and infection control efforts. Their inherent resistance mechanisms enable them to withstand antibiotic therapies, leading to recurrent infections and increased morbidity. This review explores the development of biofilms and their dual roles in health and disease. It highlights the structural and protective functions of the EPS matrix, which shields microbial populations from immune responses and antimicrobial agents. Key molecular mechanisms of biofilm resistance, including restricted antibiotic penetration, persister cell dormancy, and genetic adaptations, are identified as significant barriers to effective management. Biofilms are implicated in various clinical contexts, including chronic wounds, medical device-associated infections, oral health complications, and surgical site infections. Their prevalence in hospital environments exacerbates infection control challenges and underscores the urgent need for innovative preventive and therapeutic strategies. This review evaluates cutting-edge approaches such as DNase-mediated biofilm disruption, RNAIII-inhibiting peptides, DNABII proteins, bacteriophage therapies, antimicrobial peptides, nanoparticle-based solutions, antimicrobial coatings, and antimicrobial lock therapies. It also examines critical challenges associated with biofilm-related healthcare-associated infections, including diagnostic difficulties, disinfectant resistance, and economic implications. This review emphasizes the need for a multidisciplinary approach and underscores the importance of understanding biofilm dynamics, their role in disease pathogenesis, and the advancements in therapeutic strategies to combat biofilm-associated infections effectively in clinical settings. These insights aim to enhance treatment outcomes and reduce the burden of biofilm-related diseases. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 3353 KiB  
Review
Potential Use of Selected Natural Compounds with Anti-Biofilm Activity
by Dagmara Fydrych, Jagoda Jeziurska, Jana Wełna and Joanna Kwiecińska-Piróg
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(2), 607; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26020607 - 13 Jan 2025
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2492
Abstract
Antibiotic resistance in microorganisms is an escalating global concern, exacerbated by their formation of biofilms, which provide protection through an extracellular matrix and communication via quorum sensing, enhancing their resistance to treatment. This situation has driven the search for alternative approaches, particularly those [...] Read more.
Antibiotic resistance in microorganisms is an escalating global concern, exacerbated by their formation of biofilms, which provide protection through an extracellular matrix and communication via quorum sensing, enhancing their resistance to treatment. This situation has driven the search for alternative approaches, particularly those using natural compounds. This study explores the potential of phytochemicals, such as quercetin, apigenin, arbutin, gallic acid, proanthocyanidins, and rutin, known for their antibacterial properties and ability to inhibit biofilm formation and disrupt mature biofilms. The methods used in this study included a comprehensive review of current literature assessing the bioavailability, distribution, and effective concentrations of these compounds in treating biofilm-associated infections. The results indicate that these phytochemicals exhibit significant antibacterial effects, reduce biofilm’s structural integrity, and inhibit bacterial communication pathways. Moreover, their potential use in combination with existing antibiotics may enhance therapeutic outcomes. The findings support the conclusion that phytochemicals offer promising additions to anti-biofilm strategies and are capable of complementing or replacing conventional treatments, with appropriate therapeutic levels and delivery mechanisms being key to their effectiveness. This insight underscores the need for further research into their clinical applications for treating infections complicated by biofilms. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioactive Compounds in the Prevention of Chronic Diseases)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

26 pages, 7062 KiB  
Article
Gram Negative Biofilms: Structural and Functional Responses to Destruction by Antibiotic-Loaded Mixed Polymeric Micelles
by Tsvetozara Damyanova, Rumena Stancheva, Milena N. Leseva, Petya A. Dimitrova, Tsvetelina Paunova-Krasteva, Dayana Borisova, Katya Kamenova, Petar D. Petrov, Ralitsa Veleva, Ivelina Zhivkova, Tanya Topouzova-Hristova, Emi Haladjova and Stoyanka Stoitsova
Microorganisms 2024, 12(12), 2670; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12122670 - 23 Dec 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1422
Abstract
Biofilms are a well-known multifactorial virulence factor with a pivotal role in chronic bacterial infections. Their pathogenicity is determined by the combination of strain-specific mechanisms of virulence and the biofilm extracellular matrix (ECM) protecting the bacteria from the host immune defense and the [...] Read more.
Biofilms are a well-known multifactorial virulence factor with a pivotal role in chronic bacterial infections. Their pathogenicity is determined by the combination of strain-specific mechanisms of virulence and the biofilm extracellular matrix (ECM) protecting the bacteria from the host immune defense and the action of antibacterials. The successful antibiofilm agents should combine antibacterial activity and good biocompatibility with the capacity to penetrate through the ECM. The objective of the study is the elaboration of biofilm-ECM-destructive drug delivery systems: mixed polymeric micelles (MPMs) based on a cationic poly(2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate)-b-poly(ε-caprolactone)-b-poly(2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate) (PDMAEMA35-b-PCL70-b-PDMAEMA35) and a non-ionic poly(ethylene oxide)-b-poly(propylene oxide)-b-poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO100-b-PPO65-b-PEO100) triblock copolymers, loaded with ciprofloxacin or azithromycin. The MPMs were applied on 24 h pre-formed biofilms of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (laboratory strains and clinical isolates). The results showed that the MPMs were able to destruct the biofilms, and the viability experiments supported drug delivery. The biofilm response to the MPMs loaded with the two antibiotics revealed two distinct patterns of action. These were registered on the level of both bacterial cell-structural alterations (demonstrated by scanning electron microscopy) and the interaction with host tissues (ex vivo biofilm infection model on skin samples with tests on nitric oxide and interleukin (IL)-17A production). Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Contemporary Perspectives on Bacterial Virulence Factors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 2844 KiB  
Review
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm Lifecycle: Involvement of Mechanical Constraints and Timeline of Matrix Production
by Audrey David, Ali Tahrioui, Anne-Sophie Tareau, Adrien Forge, Mathieu Gonzalez, Emeline Bouffartigues, Olivier Lesouhaitier and Sylvie Chevalier
Antibiotics 2024, 13(8), 688; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13080688 - 24 Jul 2024
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 5695
Abstract
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic pathogen causing acute and chronic infections, especially in immunocompromised patients. Its remarkable adaptability and resistance to various antimicrobial treatments make it difficult to eradicate. Its persistence is enabled by its ability to form a biofilm. Biofilm is a [...] Read more.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic pathogen causing acute and chronic infections, especially in immunocompromised patients. Its remarkable adaptability and resistance to various antimicrobial treatments make it difficult to eradicate. Its persistence is enabled by its ability to form a biofilm. Biofilm is a community of sessile micro-organisms in a self-produced extracellular matrix, which forms a scaffold facilitating cohesion, cell attachment, and micro- and macro-colony formation. This lifestyle provides protection against environmental stresses, the immune system, and antimicrobial treatments, and confers the capacity for colonization and long-term persistence, often characterizing chronic infections. In this review, we retrace the events of the life cycle of P. aeruginosa biofilm, from surface perception/contact to cell spreading. We focus on the importance of extracellular appendages, mechanical constraints, and the kinetics of matrix component production in each step of the biofilm life cycle. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 1390 KiB  
Review
Medical Scope of Biofilm and Quorum Sensing during Biofilm Formation: Systematic Review
by Mulat Erkihun, Zelalem Asmare, Kirubel Endalamew, Birhanu Getie, Teklehaimanot Kiros and Ayenew Berhan
Bacteria 2024, 3(3), 118-135; https://doi.org/10.3390/bacteria3030008 - 24 Jun 2024
Cited by 17 | Viewed by 6215
Abstract
Biofilms are accumulations of microorganisms in an extracellular polymeric substance matrix which are composed of polysaccharides, proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids. Many bacteria can switch between a planktonic form and a biofilm form. The planktonic bacteria have relatively high cell growth and reproduction [...] Read more.
Biofilms are accumulations of microorganisms in an extracellular polymeric substance matrix which are composed of polysaccharides, proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids. Many bacteria can switch between a planktonic form and a biofilm form. The planktonic bacteria have relatively high cell growth and reproduction rates and have a reduced likelihood of survival but can adapt to occupy new habitats. The biofilm state appears to be a natural and predominant state of bacteria. The need for the formation of bacterial biofilm is that it enhances the tolerance of bacteria to harsh environmental conditions, thereby allowing bacteria to avoid being washed away by water flow or the bloodstream by simply attaching to a surface or tissue, and the EPS matrix protects bacteria cells, in deeper layers, against antimicrobial agents, probably by limiting the diffusion of these agents. Biofilm formation steps are initial contact/attachment to the surface, followed by micro-colony formation, maturation and formation of the architecture of the biofilm, and finally detachment/dispersion of the biofilm. Once formed, biofilm restricts bacterial mobility and increases cell density. Secretions of autoinducers into the environment are critical for cross-signaling between bacteria. This cross-talk is called quorum sensing (QS). Quorum sensing is a cell–cell communication mechanism between bacteria that allows specific processes to be controlled, such as biofilm formation and virulence factor expression. Bacterial quorum sensing signaling mainly consists of acyl-homoserine lactones (produced by Gram-negatives), autoinducing peptides (produced by Gram-positives), and autoinducer-2 (produced by both Gram-negatives and Gram-positives). Therefore, this review is aimed at how bacterial biofilms work and are formed. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 2581 KiB  
Review
Interactions of Neutrophils with the Polymeric Molecular Components of the Biofilm Matrix in the Context of Implant-Associated Bone and Joint Infections
by Davide Campoccia, Stefano Ravaioli, Rasoul Mirzaei, Gloria Bua, Maria Daglia and Carla Renata Arciola
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(23), 17042; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242317042 - 1 Dec 2023
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2384
Abstract
In the presence of orthopedic implants, opportunistic pathogens can easily colonize the biomaterial surfaces, forming protective biofilms. Life in biofilm is a central pathogenetic mechanism enabling bacteria to elude the host immune response and survive conventional medical treatments. The formation of mature biofilms [...] Read more.
In the presence of orthopedic implants, opportunistic pathogens can easily colonize the biomaterial surfaces, forming protective biofilms. Life in biofilm is a central pathogenetic mechanism enabling bacteria to elude the host immune response and survive conventional medical treatments. The formation of mature biofilms is universally recognized as the main cause of septic prosthetic failures. Neutrophils are the first leukocytes to be recruited at the site of infection. They are highly efficient in detecting and killing planktonic bacteria. However, the interactions of these fundamental effector cells of the immune system with the biofilm matrix, which is the true interface of a biofilm with the host cells, have only recently started to be unveiled and are still to be fully understood. Biofilm matrix macromolecules consist of exopolysaccharides, proteins, lipids, teichoic acids, and the most recently described extracellular DNA. The latter can also be stolen from neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) by bacteria, who use it to strengthen their biofilms. This paper aims to review the specific interactions that neutrophils develop when they physically encounter the matrix of a biofilm and come to interact with its polymeric molecular components. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Molecular Mechanisms of Biofilms)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1035 KiB  
Review
Advances in Material Modification with Smart Functional Polymers for Combating Biofilms in Biomedical Applications
by Luis Alberto Mejía-Manzano, Patricia Vázquez-Villegas, Luis Vicente Prado-Cervantes, Kristeel Ximena Franco-Gómez, Susana Carbajal-Ocaña, Daniela Lizeth Sotelo-Cortés, Valeria Atehortúa-Benítez, Miguel Delgado-Rodríguez and Jorge Membrillo-Hernández
Polymers 2023, 15(14), 3021; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15143021 - 12 Jul 2023
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 2840
Abstract
Biofilms as living microorganism communities are found anywhere, and for the healthcare sector, these constitute a threat and allied mechanism for health-associated or nosocomial infections. This review states the basis of biofilms and their formation. It focuses on their relevance for the biomedical [...] Read more.
Biofilms as living microorganism communities are found anywhere, and for the healthcare sector, these constitute a threat and allied mechanism for health-associated or nosocomial infections. This review states the basis of biofilms and their formation. It focuses on their relevance for the biomedical sector, generalities, and the major advances in modified or new synthesized materials to prevent or control biofilm formation in biomedicine. Biofilm is conceptualized as an aggregate of cells highly communicated in an extracellular matrix, which the formation obeys to molecular and genetic basis. The biofilm offers protection to microorganisms from unfavorable environmental conditions. The most frequent genera of microorganisms forming biofilms and reported in infections are Staphylococcus spp., Escherichia spp., and Candida spp. in implants, heart valves, catheters, medical devices, and prostheses. During the last decade, biofilms have been most commonly related to health-associated infections and deaths in Europe, the United States, and Mexico. Smart, functional polymers are materials capable of responding to diverse stimuli. These represent a strategy to fight against biofilms through the modification or synthesis of new materials. Polypropylene and poly-N-isopropyl acrylamide were used enough in the literature analysis performed. Even smart polymers serve as delivery systems for other substances, such as antibiotics, for biofilm control. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Smart Polymer in Biomedical Application)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 4798 KiB  
Article
New Approach to Improving the Efficiency of Disinfectants against Biofilms
by Elena V. Demkina, Ekaterina A. Ilicheva, Galina I. El-Registan, Timofey A. Pankratov, Yulia K. Yushina, Anastasia A. Semenova and Yuriy A. Nikolaev
Coatings 2023, 13(3), 582; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13030582 - 7 Mar 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2754
Abstract
The resistance of microorganisms’ biofilms to antibacterials is a problem both for medicine and for many industries. Increasing the effectiveness of antimicrobial agents is an urgent task. The goal of the present work was to develop a new approach to development of anti-biofilm [...] Read more.
The resistance of microorganisms’ biofilms to antibacterials is a problem both for medicine and for many industries. Increasing the effectiveness of antimicrobial agents is an urgent task. The goal of the present work was to develop a new approach to development of anti-biofilm compositions based on conventional disinfectants in combination with enhancers (adjuvants). Methods of microbiology (viable cells count, model biofilms) and electron microscopy were employed. This research formulates the principles for selection of adjuvants. The adjuvants should: (1) increase the efficiency of decomposition of the biofilm matrix or/and (2) suppress the microbial protective mechanisms. For testing anti-biofilm compositions, two models of biofilms have been developed, on a solid surface at the interface with air or liquid. It was demonstrated that hydrogen peroxide, ethanol, isopropanol, and 4-hexylresorcinol enhanced the biocidal effect of disinfectants based on oxidants (peroxides and chlorine-containing) and quaternary ammonium salts by three to six orders of magnitude. Mechanisms of adjuvant action were mechanical decomposition of the matrix (by oxygen bubbles formed inside a biofilm in the case of hydrogen peroxide), coagulation of matrix polymers (in the case of alcohols), and a decrease in metabolism (in the case of 4-hexylresorcinol). The use of approved chemicals as adjuvants will accelerate the design of effective anti-biofilm antiseptics for medicine, social hygiene, and food manufactures and other industries. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biofilms: Composition and Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 2419 KiB  
Review
A Review of Biofilm Formation of Staphylococcus aureus and Its Regulation Mechanism
by Qi Peng, Xiaohua Tang, Wanyang Dong, Ning Sun and Wenchang Yuan
Antibiotics 2023, 12(1), 12; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12010012 - 22 Dec 2022
Cited by 161 | Viewed by 21200
Abstract
Bacteria can form biofilms in natural and clinical environments on both biotic and abiotic surfaces. The bacterial aggregates embedded in biofilms are formed by their own produced extracellular matrix. Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is one of the most common pathogens of [...] Read more.
Bacteria can form biofilms in natural and clinical environments on both biotic and abiotic surfaces. The bacterial aggregates embedded in biofilms are formed by their own produced extracellular matrix. Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is one of the most common pathogens of biofilm infections. The formation of biofilm can protect bacteria from being attacked by the host immune system and antibiotics and thus bacteria can be persistent against external challenges. Therefore, clinical treatments for biofilm infections are currently encountering difficulty. To address this critical challenge, a new and effective treatment method needs to be developed. A comprehensive understanding of bacterial biofilm formation and regulation mechanisms may provide meaningful insights against antibiotic resistance due to bacterial biofilms. In this review, we discuss an overview of S. aureus biofilms including the formation process, structural and functional properties of biofilm matrix, and the mechanism regulating biofilm formation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Antimicrobial Resistance and Anti-Biofilms)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 5266 KiB  
Article
Characterization of Mixed-Species Biofilms Formed by Four Gut Microbiota
by Tao Xu, Yue Xiao, Hongchao Wang, Jinlin Zhu, Yuankun Lee, Jianxin Zhao, Wenwei Lu and Hao Zhang
Microorganisms 2022, 10(12), 2332; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10122332 - 25 Nov 2022
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 2977
Abstract
In natural settings, approximately 40–80% of bacteria exist as biofilms, most of which are mixed-species biofilms. Previous studies have typically focused on single- or dual-species biofilms. To expand the field of study on gut biofilms, we found a group of gut microbiota that [...] Read more.
In natural settings, approximately 40–80% of bacteria exist as biofilms, most of which are mixed-species biofilms. Previous studies have typically focused on single- or dual-species biofilms. To expand the field of study on gut biofilms, we found a group of gut microbiota that can form biofilms well in vitro: Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis, Enterococcus faecalis, Bacteroides ovatus, and Lactobacillus gasseri. The increase in biomass and bio-volume of the mixed-species biofilm was confirmed via crystal violet staining, field emission scanning electron microscopy, and confocal laser scanning microscopy, revealing a strong synergistic relationship in these communities, with B. longum being the key biofilm-contributing species. This interaction may be related to changes in the cell number, biofilm-related genes, and metabolic activities. After quantifying the cell number using quantitative polymerase chain reaction, B. longum and L. gasseri were found to be the dominant flora in the mixed-species biofilm. In addition, this study analyzed biological properties of mixed-species biofilms, such as antibiotic resistance, cell metabolic activity, and concentration of water-insoluble polysaccharides. Compared with single-species biofilms, mixed-species biofilms had higher metabolic activity, more extracellular matrix, and greater antibiotic resistance. From these results, we can see that the formation of biofilms is a self-protection mechanism of gut microbiota, and the formation of mixed-species biofilms can greatly improve the survival rate of different strains. Finally, this study is a preliminary exploration of the biological characteristics of gut biofilms, and the molecular mechanisms underlying the formation of biofilms warrant further research. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biofilm Formation and Survival Strategies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

32 pages, 7463 KiB  
Review
Prevention and Eradication of Biofilm by Dendrimers: A Possibility Still Little Explored
by Silvana Alfei and Debora Caviglia
Pharmaceutics 2022, 14(10), 2016; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14102016 - 22 Sep 2022
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 3093
Abstract
Multidrug resistance (MDR) among pathogens and the associated infections represent an escalating global public health problem that translates into raised mortality and healthcare costs. MDR bacteria, with both intrinsic abilities to resist antibiotics treatments and capabilities to transmit genetic material coding for further [...] Read more.
Multidrug resistance (MDR) among pathogens and the associated infections represent an escalating global public health problem that translates into raised mortality and healthcare costs. MDR bacteria, with both intrinsic abilities to resist antibiotics treatments and capabilities to transmit genetic material coding for further resistance to other bacteria, dramatically decrease the number of available effective antibiotics, especially in nosocomial environments. Moreover, the capability of several bacterial species to form biofilms (BFs) is an added alarming mechanism through which resistance develops. BF, made of bacterial communities organized and incorporated into an extracellular polymeric matrix, self-produced by bacteria, provides protection from the antibiotics’ action, resulting in the antibiotic being ineffective. By adhering to living or abiotic surfaces present both in the environment and in the healthcare setting, BF causes the onset of difficult-to-eradicate infections, since it is difficult to prevent its formation and even more difficult to promote its disintegration. Inspired by natural antimicrobial peptides (NAMPs) acting as membrane disruptors, with a low tendency to develop resistance and demonstrated antibiofilm potentialities, cationic polymers and dendrimers, with similar or even higher potency than NAMPs and with low toxicity, have been developed, some of which have shown in vitro antibiofilm activity. Here, aiming to incite further development of new antibacterial agents capable of inhibiting BF formation and dispersing mature BF, we review all dendrimers developed to this end in the last fifteen years. The extension of the knowledge about these still little-explored materials could be a successful approach to find effective weapons for treating chronic infections and biomaterial-associated infections (BAIs) sustained by BF-producing MDR bacteria. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Women in Pharmaceutics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop