Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (217)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
17 pages, 2095 KB  
Review
Emerging Therapies Targeting Lipoprotein(a): A Clinical Trial Landscape Review of Investigational Lp(a)-Lowering Therapies
by Reema M. Alotaibi, Rimas H. Al-Salmi, Renad O. Shosho, Yahya A. Alzahrani and Maan H. Harbi
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(13), 5233; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15135233 - 4 Jul 2026
Viewed by 465
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an independent cardiovascular risk factor associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and calcific aortic valve disease. Historically, therapeutic options for reducing Lp(a) have been limited. This study aimed to characterize the clinical development landscape of emerging Lp(a)-targeted therapies, [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an independent cardiovascular risk factor associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and calcific aortic valve disease. Historically, therapeutic options for reducing Lp(a) have been limited. This study aimed to characterize the clinical development landscape of emerging Lp(a)-targeted therapies, evaluate endpoint assessment strategies, and summarize available efficacy evidence from investigational agents. Methods: A qualitative clinical trial landscape review was conducted using ClinicalTrials.gov. Interventional Phase I–III studies evaluating therapies specifically targeting Lp(a) were identified through a structured registry search performed on 5 November 2025. Eligible studies were screened according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Extracted data included trial characteristics, therapeutic class, endpoint methodologies, and published efficacy outcomes. Data were synthesized narratively. Results: Twenty clinical trials met the eligibility criteria. Three therapeutic classes were identified: antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs), small interfering RNA (siRNA)-based therapies, and small-molecule inhibitors. Pelacarsen represented the sole ASO program, whereas siRNA-based therapies constituted the largest therapeutic category. Five studies were designed as cardiovascular outcomes trials. Percent change from baseline in circulating Lp(a) concentration was the most frequently used efficacy endpoint. Published data demonstrated substantial reductions in Lp(a) concentrations across all major therapeutic platforms. Available non-head-to-head published evidence showed substantial Lp(a) reductions across several investigational agents, including siRNA-based therapies, pelacarsen, and muvalaplin, although differences between studies preclude direct comparison between therapeutic platforms. Conclusions: The Lp(a) therapeutic landscape has rapidly evolved, with RNA-based therapies demonstrating unprecedented reductions in circulating Lp(a) concentrations. Ongoing cardiovascular outcomes trials will determine whether these reductions translate into meaningful cardiovascular benefits, establish Lp(a) as a therapeutic target in cardiovascular prevention and clarify the long-term safety and risk–benefit profile of Lp(a)-targeted therapies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 5255 KB  
Review
Molecular Diagnosis to Individualized Therapies in Rare Genetic Diseases: New Approach Methodologies, RNA Therapeutics, and the Case for a Human-First Filter
by Saeed Anwar and Toshifumi Yokota
Genes 2026, 17(7), 780; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes17070780 - 3 Jul 2026
Viewed by 878
Abstract
Rare genetic diseases are heterogeneous across mechanisms, trajectories, and treatment responses. To date, approved therapies remain available for only a small proportion of rare genetic diseases. Oligonucleotide-based RNA therapeutics, particularly antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) and small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), offer a promising therapeutic avenue [...] Read more.
Rare genetic diseases are heterogeneous across mechanisms, trajectories, and treatment responses. To date, approved therapies remain available for only a small proportion of rare genetic diseases. Oligonucleotide-based RNA therapeutics, particularly antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) and small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), offer a promising therapeutic avenue for rare genetic diseases with sequence-level precision. However, traditional preclinical paths may mis-predict human outcomes when disease biology diverges from animal models. New approach methodologies (NAMs), including patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), organoid models, and clinical-trials-in-a-dish (CTiD), aim to bring human biology earlier into the translational pipeline. NAMs enable variant-to-function studies, efficacy screening, and safety triage at clinically relevant speed and scale. While critics argue that NAMs are unvalidated and cannot replace preclinical animal models, proponents report that they are increasingly able to recapitulate human phenotypes and predict clinical liabilities, although their predictive validity remains context-dependent. Here, a front-loaded human filter refers to the use of human-derived systems early in development to support mechanistic interpretation, candidate prioritization, and early liability assessment before broader nonclinical evaluation. Recent studies pairing NAMs with ASOs support rapid, patient-specific preclinical screening in selected settings, while also showing the need for broader evidence on delivery, pharmacology, safety, and clinical relevance. This review places these developments within the translational realities of oligonucleotide-based therapeutics, including model fidelity, ASO chemistry and optimization, delivery challenges, pharmacology, regulatory pathways for individualized ASOs, and accessibility. We also propose a pragmatic validation framework to assess the scientific and translational credibility of NAMs across rare genetic diseases. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis, Management and Therapy of Rare Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 3046 KB  
Review
Beyond Coding Variants: RNA-Level Mechanisms in Human Disease and Precision Therapeutics
by Himanshu Goel
Genes 2026, 17(7), 777; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes17070777 - 30 Jun 2026
Viewed by 291
Abstract
Clinical genomics has traditionally focused on protein-coding variation, yet many pathogenic mechanisms arise through alterations in RNA processing, stability, localisation, translation, and surveillance. Prior reviews have addressed individual RNA layers, splicing, non-coding RNAs, RNA therapeutics, or RNA diagnostics in isolation. This review presents [...] Read more.
Clinical genomics has traditionally focused on protein-coding variation, yet many pathogenic mechanisms arise through alterations in RNA processing, stability, localisation, translation, and surveillance. Prior reviews have addressed individual RNA layers, splicing, non-coding RNAs, RNA therapeutics, or RNA diagnostics in isolation. This review presents an integrated, mechanism-matched framework linking RNA-level disease mechanisms to diagnostic reasoning and therapeutic selection across all major RNA layers, offering a practical resource for clinical geneticists and translational researchers. I examine how splicing defects, pseudoexon inclusion, polyadenylation disruption, RNA editing loss, untranslated-region variants, premature termination codons, stop-loss variants, RNA-binding protein dysfunction, non-coding RNA dysregulation, altered codon usage, ribosome stalling, and surveillance pathway failure, including nonsense-mediated decay, nonstop decay, and no-go decay, each create distinct and mechanistically addressable disease states. A central argument of this review is that treatment selection must be mechanism-matched rather than gene- or variant-class-based: splice defects may require antisense oligonucleotide (ASO)-mediated correction or small-molecule splice modulation; toxic transcripts may require ASO- or siRNA-mediated silencing; haploinsufficiency may require mRNA replacement or transcript rescue; premature termination codons are candidates for readthrough only when transcript and protein context are favourable. I further argue that RNA sequencing, long-read transcriptomics, allele-specific expression analysis, and functional assays are essential for both diagnosis and therapeutic stratification. The framework described here moves clinical variant interpretation beyond descriptive classification toward mechanism-based, RNA-centric precision medicine. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Targeting RNA Coding Mechanisms in Disease Molecular Pathways)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 15966 KB  
Review
Survivin-Targeting Antisense Oligonucleotides in Cancer Therapy
by Bal Hari Poudel, Suxiang Chen and Rakesh N. Veedu
Molecules 2026, 31(13), 2283; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31132283 - 30 Jun 2026
Viewed by 366
Abstract
Survivin (BIRC5) is a key inhibitor of apoptosis that is highly overexpressed in many cancers, where it promotes tumour cell survival, mitotic progression, and resistance to therapy. Because survivin is largely absent from normal adult tissues, it represents a selective and promising target [...] Read more.
Survivin (BIRC5) is a key inhibitor of apoptosis that is highly overexpressed in many cancers, where it promotes tumour cell survival, mitotic progression, and resistance to therapy. Because survivin is largely absent from normal adult tissues, it represents a selective and promising target for cancer treatment. Antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) provide a precise approach to silence survivin by targeting its transcripts. Preclinical studies have shown that ASO-mediated reduction of survivin is associated with increased cancer cell death, inhibition of tumour growth, and enhanced sensitivity to other treatments. Early-phase clinical trials of survivin-targeting ASOs have shown evidence of target engagement but ultimately failed to demonstrate consistent clinical benefit and/or encountered dose-limiting toxicities, which hindered their further development. This review outlines survivin’s central role in cancer biology, the principles of ASO therapeutics (sequence design, mechanisms of action, chemical modifications, and delivery strategies), and the progress in preclinical and clinical development of survivin-targeting ASOs, while also discussing key challenges that may contribute to their clinical limitations, including inefficient delivery, off-target effects, and systemic toxicities. Collectively, the current status of survivin-targeting ASOs underscores the need for synergistic optimization of delivery platforms and molecular chemistry to improve efficacy and safety, thereby enabling their use in personalised and combination cancer treatment approaches. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecules Medicinal Chemistry Reviews, 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

30 pages, 1372 KB  
Review
The Versatile Applications of Antisense Oligonucleotides in Modern Medicine
by Xue-Hai Liang and Lingdi Zhang
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27(12), 5612; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27125612 - 22 Jun 2026
Viewed by 456
Abstract
Antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) are a class of nucleic acid therapeutics that modulate gene expression through diverse mechanisms. Since their initial demonstration in inhibiting viral genes, advances in medicinal chemistry, pharmacology, and delivery have enabled robust and durable target engagement across multiple tissues. Chemical [...] Read more.
Antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) are a class of nucleic acid therapeutics that modulate gene expression through diverse mechanisms. Since their initial demonstration in inhibiting viral genes, advances in medicinal chemistry, pharmacology, and delivery have enabled robust and durable target engagement across multiple tissues. Chemical modifications to the backbone, ribose, and nucleobases have improved nuclease resistance, binding affinity, and pharmacokinetics, while conjugation and delivery technologies have expanded tissue accessibility. Beyond classical RNase H–mediated RNA degradation, ASOs regulate gene expression via splicing modulation, microRNA inhibition, transcriptional activation, and translation modulation, supporting both gene silencing and upregulation strategies. Multiple ASO drugs are now approved, particularly for genetic diseases, with many more in clinical development. This review outlines the evolution of antisense technology, key chemical and delivery innovations, ASO pharmacokinetics and intracellular trafficking, the mechanisms underlying gene regulation, and current clinical applications and future opportunities. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antisense Oligonucleotides: Versatile Tools with Broad Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1113 KB  
Review
Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Targets of RNA-Based and Traditional Lipid-Lowering Agents in Residual Cardiovascular Risk: A Scoping Review of Key Directions Towards Future Perspectives
by Diana Tatarciuc, Irina Mihaela Esanu, Mioara Florentina Trandafirescu, Ana Maria Raluca Pauna, Teodor Flaviu Vasilcu, Iolanda Foia, Adina Oana Armencia, Magda Ecaterina Antohe, Dragos Catalin Ghica, Ovidiu Stamatin and Roxana Ionela Vasluianu
Biomolecules 2026, 16(6), 807; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom16060807 - 29 May 2026
Viewed by 387
Abstract
Residual cardiovascular risk arises from dysregulated expression of genes encoding apolipoprotein(a) (LPA), apolipoprotein C-III (APOC3), angiopoietin-like gene 3 (ANGPTL3), and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9). RNA-based therapies, small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), and antisense oligonucleotides [...] Read more.
Residual cardiovascular risk arises from dysregulated expression of genes encoding apolipoprotein(a) (LPA), apolipoprotein C-III (APOC3), angiopoietin-like gene 3 (ANGPTL3), and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9). RNA-based therapies, small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), and antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) modulate these targets at the post-transcriptional level through RNA interference and RNase H-mediated degradation, respectively. This scoping review maps the molecular mechanisms, target involvement, and pharmacodynamic outcomes of RNA therapies for managing residual cardiovascular risk, with contextual comparison to traditional lipid-lowering agents. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus was performed from 2020 to February 2026. Of the 1088 records identified, 30 studies met the inclusion criteria. RNA therapies have demonstrated potential for engagement, with 80–98% reductions in Lp(a) (pelacarsen, olpasiran, zerlasiran, lepodisiran), 50–80% reductions in triglycerides (olezarsen, plozasiran, volanesorsen), and 36–44% reductions in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Mechanistically, siRNAs achieve gene silencing through RISC-mediated mRNA cleavage, with sustained pharmacodynamic effects (3–6 months) because of Argonaute-2 stability, while gapmer ASOs recruit RNase H1 for mRNA degradation. Conjugation with GalNAc allows for hepatocyte-specific delivery with a subcutaneous bioavailability of 70–85%. Safety profiles were favorable, with injection site reactions (4–12%) being the most common adverse event. This analysis maps the emerging molecular landscape of RNA therapies, highlighting their substantial precision for targeting residual cardiovascular risk pathways that cannot be addressed by traditional agents. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1029 KB  
Review
RNA Therapeutics Targeting Skeletal Muscle: Emerging Antisense and Gene-Modifying Strategies
by Takayuki Kuroda and Toshifumi Yokota
Biomolecules 2026, 16(6), 794; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom16060794 - 28 May 2026
Viewed by 1277
Abstract
RNA-based therapeutics are reshaping the treatment landscape for skeletal muscle disorders by enabling modulation of RNA processing or direct correction of disease-causing alleles. In Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), four antisense oligonucleotides—eteplirsen, golodirsen, viltolarsen, and casimersen—have received FDA approval; these phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligomers (PMOs) [...] Read more.
RNA-based therapeutics are reshaping the treatment landscape for skeletal muscle disorders by enabling modulation of RNA processing or direct correction of disease-causing alleles. In Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), four antisense oligonucleotides—eteplirsen, golodirsen, viltolarsen, and casimersen—have received FDA approval; these phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligomers (PMOs) induce exon skipping to restore the reading frame and enable expression of internally truncated dystrophin. Beyond splice switching, RNA therapeutics include RNase H-active gapmers and steric-blocking antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs), small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) that mediate post-transcriptional gene silencing, and RNA-guided gene-modifying technologies such as CRISPR systems that can reframe or repair endogenous alleles. Despite major progress in DMD, broader clinical impact remains constrained by inefficient delivery to skeletal and especially cardiac muscle, the need for repeat administration for most modalities, and safety considerations that limit dose escalation and durability. Next-generation approaches aim to overcome these barriers through peptide- or antibody-conjugated oligonucleotides that enhance cellular uptake and tissue distribution, alternative chemistries with improved stability and potency, and viral or non-viral platforms for durable splice modulation. In parallel, CRISPR-based strategies—including base and prime editing—offer the prospect of one-time correction, while raising important questions regarding delivery, immunogenicity, editing specificity, and long-term safety. This review synthesizes recent advances in antisense and gene-modifying strategies for skeletal muscle and highlights practical priorities for translation, including improved muscle/heart delivery, controllable safety mechanisms, scalable manufacturing, and standardized biomarker-to-clinical outcome relationships. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 6645 KB  
Review
Targeting CFTR Ubiquitination: Current Advances in Therapeutic Strategies for Cystic Fibrosis
by Yuka Kamada and Tsukasa Okiyoneda
Kinases Phosphatases 2026, 4(2), 13; https://doi.org/10.3390/kinasesphosphatases4020013 - 26 May 2026
Viewed by 401
Abstract
Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a monogenic disease caused by mutations in the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR), whose folding, trafficking, and stability are tightly controlled by ubiquitination-dependent protein quality control (PQC) pathways. Although CFTR modulators have transformed CF therapy, their efficacy remains limited [...] Read more.
Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a monogenic disease caused by mutations in the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR), whose folding, trafficking, and stability are tightly controlled by ubiquitination-dependent protein quality control (PQC) pathways. Although CFTR modulators have transformed CF therapy, their efficacy remains limited by persistent ubiquitination and degradation of rescued CFTR. This limitation is particularly evident in class I mutations, where premature termination codons (PTCs) reduce full-length CFTR protein production and no approved mutation-specific therapies are broadly available for canonical PTC variants. Recent advances highlight ubiquitination as a critical and druggable determinant of CFTR stability. The E3 ligase RFFL regulates peripheral CFTR PQC, restricting the stability of rescued CFTR at the plasma membrane (PM). Inhibition of RFFL, including via antisense oligonucleotides (ASO) and small molecules, enhances CFTR rescue and improves outcomes in combination with modulators and translational readthrough therapies. In parallel, deubiquitinase (DUB)-targeting chimeras (DUBTACs) have emerged as a novel modality to stabilize proteins by reversing ubiquitination. Here, we review current advances in targeting CFTR ubiquitination, with a focus on RFFL inhibition and DUBTAC-based strategies, and discuss their opportunities and translational limitations as components of next-generation CF therapies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 521 KB  
Review
Current and Emerging Pharmacological Therapies for Hypertriglyceridemia
by Ibrahim S. Alhomoud
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27(8), 3573; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27083573 - 16 Apr 2026
Viewed by 1026
Abstract
Hypertriglyceridemia is a well-recognized contributor to residual atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk and a predisposing factor for acute pancreatitis. Despite the availability of pharmacologic agents and lifestyle interventions, patients with severe and refractory hypertriglyceridemia often fail to achieve adequate control. Recent advances in the [...] Read more.
Hypertriglyceridemia is a well-recognized contributor to residual atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk and a predisposing factor for acute pancreatitis. Despite the availability of pharmacologic agents and lifestyle interventions, patients with severe and refractory hypertriglyceridemia often fail to achieve adequate control. Recent advances in the molecular understanding of triglyceride metabolism have driven the development of targeted therapies that selectively modulate key regulatory pathways. This study sought to provide an overview of triglyceride regulation, the atherogenic role of remnant lipoproteins, and clinical evidence of emerging triglyceride-lowering therapies. Lipoprotein metabolism is regulated by a complex network of regulatory proteins that include lipoprotein lipase (LPL), apolipoproteins such as apolipoprotein C-III (ApoC-III), and angiopoietin-like proteins (ANGPTLs). Targeting these proteins in the metabolic cascade has shown promising results in reducing triglyceride levels. Emerging therapies such as antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) and small interfering RNA (siRNA) directed against ApoC-III (volanesorsen, olezarsen, and plozasiran), inhibitors of ANGPTL3 (evinacumab and zodasiran), and fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF-21) analogs (pegozafermin) have demonstrated substantial triglyceride-lowering efficacy. These agents have achieved reductions in triglyceride levels of up to 80% in clinical trials. Additionally, preliminary evidence suggests that these agents may also reduce the incidence of acute pancreatitis and improve cardiometabolic risk profiles, although dedicated trials are still needed to confirm these outcomes. The therapeutic landscape for hypertriglyceridemia is rapidly evolving. Integrating these novel agents into clinical practice will require individualized treatment plans, sustained lifestyle modification, and careful safety monitoring. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2516 KB  
Article
CTLA-4 Antisense Oligonucleotide Contributes to Enhanced Immunogenicity of an Adjuvanted Recombinant Sporothrix spp. Enolase Antigen
by Giovanna Justino Momente, Deivys Leandro Portuondo, Adriana Fernandes de Deus, Matheus Ricardo Curti Gonçalves, Fernanda Luiza Piccineli, Tarcila Pavicic Catalan de Oliveira Campos, Damiana Téllez-Martínez, Iracilda Zeppone Carlos and Alexander Batista-Duharte
Vaccines 2026, 14(4), 334; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines14040334 - 9 Apr 2026
Viewed by 830
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Sporotrichosis is an emerging zoonotic subcutaneous fungal infection with limited therapeutic options, highlighting the need for improved immunomodulatory strategies. CTLA-4 is an inhibitory immune checkpoint that negatively regulates T-cell activation. In this study, we evaluated whether a CTLA-4 antisense oligonucleotide (CTLA-4 [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Sporotrichosis is an emerging zoonotic subcutaneous fungal infection with limited therapeutic options, highlighting the need for improved immunomodulatory strategies. CTLA-4 is an inhibitory immune checkpoint that negatively regulates T-cell activation. In this study, we evaluated whether a CTLA-4 antisense oligonucleotide (CTLA-4 ASO) is associated with enhanced immune responses to an adjuvanted recombinant Sporothrix sp. enolase antigen (rSsEno) formulation. Methods: CTLA-4 ASO uptake, cytotoxicity, and gene-silencing activity were assessed in murine splenocytes in vitro. BALB/c mice were immunized with rSsEno formulated with Montanide Gel 01, either alone or in combination with 5 µg CTLA-4 ASO. Antigen-specific serum antibody responses were quantified by ELISA. Splenocytes from immunized mice were restimulated with enolase, and cytokine production (IFN-γ, IL-2, IL-17, and TNF-α) was measured using Cytometric Bead Array (CBA). Results: CTLA-4 ASO was efficiently internalized by splenocytes and was associated with reduced expression of CTLA-4 without detectable cytotoxicity in vitro. Mice receiving the ASO-supplemented formulation developed significantly higher anti-enolase antibody titers compared to those immunized with adjuvant alone. Upon antigen restimulation, splenocytes from ASO-treated mice produced higher levels of IFN-γ, IL-2, TNF-α, and IL-17, consistent with an enhanced recall response characterized by a mixed Th1/Th17 cytokine profile. Conclusions: CTLA-4 ASO was associated with an enhanced recall response characterized by a mixed Th1/Th17 cytokine profile. These findings suggest a potential immunomodulatory effect of CTLA-4 targeting. Further studies incorporating dose optimization, infection challenge models, and appropriate sequence controls are required to determine the specificity and relevance of these effects for protective immunity against sporotrichosis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Human Immune Responses to Infection and Vaccination)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 783 KB  
Review
Lipoprotein(a) in Cardiovascular Disease: What Clinicians Need to Know: A Narrative Review
by Elisabetta Ricottini, Nicolò Graziano Ciavaroli, Anna Di Cristo, Antonio Emanuele Lentini, Teresa Trunfio, Luca D’Antonio, Fabio Mangiacapra, Annunziata Nusca, Valeria Cammalleri, Rosetta Melfi, Nino Cocco, Paolo Gallo, Raffaele Rinaldi, Annamaria Tavernese, Francesco Piccirillo, Martina Gelfusa, Giorgio Antonelli, Laura Gatto, Saverio Muscoli and Gian Paolo Ussia
Therapeutics 2026, 3(2), 11; https://doi.org/10.3390/therapeutics3020011 - 7 Apr 2026
Viewed by 1462
Abstract
Extensive evidence now confirms Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] as a causal, independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Elevated Lp(a) levels are detected in approximately 20% of the global population, positioning it as a major contributor to residual cardiovascular risk. Circulating Lp(a) levels are determined [...] Read more.
Extensive evidence now confirms Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] as a causal, independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Elevated Lp(a) levels are detected in approximately 20% of the global population, positioning it as a major contributor to residual cardiovascular risk. Circulating Lp(a) levels are determined predominantly by genetic factors, so they are largely unresponsive to lifestyle modifications or conventional lipid-lowering therapies. Therefore, multiple international guidelines now endorse a one-time, lifetime measurement of Lp(a), as lowering Lp(a) concentrations is expected to have a positive impact on the reduction of cardiovascular risk. Currently, the therapeutic landscape of Lp(a) lowering drugs is rapidly evolving. Some RNA-based therapies (antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) and small interfering RNAs (siRNAs)) have been demonstrated to reduce plasma Lp(a) concentrations by up to 98% in early-phase clinical trials. The efficacy and safety of these compounds are currently being evaluated in large-scale cardiovascular outcome trials. The results of these studies will be critical in validating the “Lp(a) hypothesis”: specific reduction of Lp(a) levels can lead to a measurable decrease in cardiovascular events. The purpose of this narrative review is to examine and discuss the available evidence on the role of Lp(a) as a risk factor and pharmacological target to provide a practical tool for decision-making in clinical practice. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

39 pages, 2757 KB  
Review
Antisense Oligonucleotides: Technological Advances, Clinical Progress, and Expanding Therapeutic Frontiers
by Liping Xu, Huaqun Zhang, Bingchen Jiang, Yuanying Jiang and Hui Lu
Pharmaceutics 2026, 18(4), 446; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics18040446 - 4 Apr 2026
Viewed by 1875
Abstract
Antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) are emerging therapeutic agents that modulate gene expression at the RNA level, offering distinct therapeutic advantages over conventional small-molecule drugs and biologics. By directly targeting RNA, ASOs expand the spectrum of druggable targets to include those previously considered “undruggable”, and [...] Read more.
Antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) are emerging therapeutic agents that modulate gene expression at the RNA level, offering distinct therapeutic advantages over conventional small-molecule drugs and biologics. By directly targeting RNA, ASOs expand the spectrum of druggable targets to include those previously considered “undruggable”, and enable shorter development timelines with improved research and development efficiency. These attributes position ASOs as a highly promising platform for precision and personalized medicine. Recent advances in chemical modification strategies and delivery technologies have markedly accelerated their clinical translation. This review systematically examines the technological evolution of ASO therapeutics, detailing their mechanisms of action, key chemical modification strategies, and advanced delivery systems. It also provides a comprehensive overview of the current global clinical landscape, including approved drugs, discontinued candidates, and ongoing clinical trials. Finally, this review discusses the major challenges facing the field and outlines future directions, with the aim of informing subsequent basic research and clinical development efforts. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Gene and Cell Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

32 pages, 1455 KB  
Review
The Future of Liver-Targeted Protein Synthesis Inhibition: Current Treatments, Emerging Strategies, and Next-Generation Therapeutics
by Julia Horwacik, Mateusz Maligłówka, Łukasz Bułdak and Bogusław Okopień
Livers 2026, 6(2), 25; https://doi.org/10.3390/livers6020025 - 1 Apr 2026
Viewed by 2507
Abstract
The liver produces the majority of plasma proteins, maintaining the metabolic homeostasis. The dysregulation of liver protein synthesis underlies many systemic conditions. Therefore, there is a great potential in therapies that inhibit the hepatic protein production. This is the mechanism of action of [...] Read more.
The liver produces the majority of plasma proteins, maintaining the metabolic homeostasis. The dysregulation of liver protein synthesis underlies many systemic conditions. Therefore, there is a great potential in therapies that inhibit the hepatic protein production. This is the mechanism of action of antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) and small interfering RNA (siRNA). These therapeutics have undergone rapid development and are revolutionizing the pharmacological landscape of many liver-related diseases (e.g., inclisiran in familial hypercholesterolemia). Furthermore, gene-editing technologies that allow a direct correction of impaired genes in the liver are currently being evaluated. They hold a promise for future advances in treatment, especially of monogenic disorders such as hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis or alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency. In this review, we describe the most relevant systemic diseases caused by dysfunction of protein synthesis in liver cells, in which significant therapeutic progress has been made over the last decades. Moreover, we present currently available drugs and their mechanisms of action, including six siRNA agents and five ASOs that have been approved to date. Finally, we discuss emerging strategies, focusing on novel RNA-based therapeutics that are the subjects of ongoing clinical trials. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1669 KB  
Case Report
A Homozygous Deep Intronic SNX14 Variant Activates Pseudo-Exon Inclusion in a Patient with SCAR20
by Doriana Misceo, Petter Strømme, Arvind Y. M. Sundaram, Pål Marius Bjørnstad, Mari Elen Strand, Maninder Singh Chawla and Eirik Frengen
Genes 2026, 17(4), 378; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes17040378 - 26 Mar 2026
Viewed by 755
Abstract
Background: The contribution of intronic variants to the etiology of Mendelian diseases is still underrecognized, impacting the diagnostic yield. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) detects intronic variants, but besides canonical splice-sites, intronic variants are frequently excluded from the interpretation step or are classified [...] Read more.
Background: The contribution of intronic variants to the etiology of Mendelian diseases is still underrecognized, impacting the diagnostic yield. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) detects intronic variants, but besides canonical splice-sites, intronic variants are frequently excluded from the interpretation step or are classified as variants of uncertain significance (VUS). In fact, assessing their clinical significance often requires validation via RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) or in vitro studies. Methods: We studied a 31-year-old patient with spinocerebellar ataxia who lacked a molecular diagnosis after WGS analysis. We applied the Detection of RNA Outliers Pipeline (DROP) to analyze RNA-seq data from patient fibroblasts. DROP integrates OUTRIDER and FRASER 2.0 algorithms designed to identify aberrant gene expression and splicing, respectively. Results: DROP identified differential expression and aberrant splicing of SNX14. Retrospective WGS data analysis revealed a homozygous NM_153816.6(SNX14): c.867+288A>G deep intronic variant, which caused pseudo-exon activation and reduced transcript levels. Biallelic loss-of-function variants in SNX14 cause autosomal recessive spinocerebellar ataxia type 20 (SCAR20; OMIM 616354), consistent with the clinical presentation of this case. Conclusions: We identify a deep intronic SNX14 variant as the genetic basis of SCAR20. We demonstrate the utility of RNA-seq to increase the diagnostic yield by identifying and resolving the pathogenicity of deep intronic variants. Defining aberrant splicing events is therapeutically relevant, as these mechanisms are targets for antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) based interventions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Genetics and Genomics of Rare Disorders)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

24 pages, 919 KB  
Review
RNA Therapeutics for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Exon Skipping, RNA Editing, and Translational Insights from Genome-Edited Microminipig Models
by Alex Chassin, Hiroya Ono, Yuki Ashida, Michihiro Imamura and Yoshitsugu Aoki
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27(6), 2755; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27062755 - 18 Mar 2026
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2032
Abstract
Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a severe X-linked neuromuscular disease (NMD) caused by loss-of-function mutations in the DMD gene. RNA-based therapies, especially antisense oligonucleotides (ASO)-mediated exon skipping and adenosine deaminase acting on RNA (ADAR)-guided RNA editing, have emerged as complementary approaches that modulate [...] Read more.
Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a severe X-linked neuromuscular disease (NMD) caused by loss-of-function mutations in the DMD gene. RNA-based therapies, especially antisense oligonucleotides (ASO)-mediated exon skipping and adenosine deaminase acting on RNA (ADAR)-guided RNA editing, have emerged as complementary approaches that modulate pre-mRNA splicing or correct transcripts without altering genomic DNA. Current phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligomer (PMO) drugs targeting exons 51, 53, and 45 provide mutation-class-specific benefit. At the same time, next-generation delivery strategies (e.g., peptide-conjugated PMOs (PPMOs), antibody–oligonucleotide conjugates (AOC), and endosomal-escape vehicles) aim to improve skeletal, cardiac, and diaphragm exposure. In parallel, RNA editing strategies offer a route to correct select nonsense or missense variants at the base level and may, in principle, restore near-native dystrophin expression. Meaningful translation of these modalities requires predictive large-animal models. A genome-edited microminipig (MMP) bearing DMD exon-23 mutations faithfully recapitulates hallmark features of human DMD. That includes early locomotor deficits, elevated serum creatine kinase (CK) and cardiac troponin T, progressive myocardial fibrosis, and a decline in left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), while maintaining a manageable lifespan of approximately 30 months suitable for long-term studies. In particular, the MMP model provides a practical platform for addressing the persistent challenge of efficient therapeutic delivery to the heart and diaphragm through longitudinal dosing, imaging, and biopsy. In this review, we synthesize clinical progress in exon skipping, outline the promise of RNA editing, and integrate recent insights from Duchenne muscular dystrophy model for microminipigs (DMD-MMPs) as an advanced surrogate for preclinical development and translational evaluation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Genome-Edited Animal Models)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop