Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (69)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = aggressive-variant prostate cancer

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
13 pages, 963 KB  
Review
Choline PET/CT in the PSMA Era: Clinical Repositioning, Biological Perspectives, and Emerging Applications
by Virginia Rossetti, Lorenzo Fantini, Irene Marini, Monica Celli, Ilaria Grassi, Maddalena Sansovini, Silvia Nicolini, Federica Matteucci and Paola Caroli
Diagnostics 2026, 16(13), 2108; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16132108 - 6 Jul 2026
Viewed by 214
Abstract
The widespread adoption of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted PET/CT has profoundly reshaped molecular imaging in prostate cancer and has substantially reduced the routine use of radiolabeled choline tracers. However, the transition from choline to PSMA imaging should not be interpreted simply as the [...] Read more.
The widespread adoption of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted PET/CT has profoundly reshaped molecular imaging in prostate cancer and has substantially reduced the routine use of radiolabeled choline tracers. However, the transition from choline to PSMA imaging should not be interpreted simply as the replacement of one radiopharmaceutical by another, but rather as part of a broader evolution from metabolism-based imaging toward receptor-targeted and biology-driven imaging strategies. This narrative review critically reassesses the residual and emerging role of choline PET/CT in the PSMA era, with particular attention to the biological rationale of choline uptake, selected prostate cancer scenarios, and extra-prostatic applications. In prostate cancer, PSMA PET/CT remains the dominant imaging modality because of its superior diagnostic performance, particularly in biochemical recurrence; nevertheless, choline PET/CT may provide complementary metabolic information in highly selected settings, including PSMA-low or heterogeneous disease, aggressive or dedifferentiated variants, neuroendocrine transformation, equivocal PSMA findings, and limited PSMA availability. These prostate cancer applications, however, are supported mainly by biological rationale, indirect evidence, and limited clinical data and should therefore be regarded as exploratory rather than established indications. By contrast, 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT has emerged as a clinically established imaging modality in primary hyperparathyroidism, particularly after negative or inconclusive conventional imaging, with prospective studies and meta-analyses demonstrating high detection rates and superior performance compared with conventional scintigraphic techniques. Additional applications in hepatocellular carcinoma and selected neuro-oncologic settings remain exploratory and require further validation. Overall, choline PET/CT should not be considered obsolete in the PSMA era, but selectively repositioned within biology-driven and multiparametric imaging strategies, with its strongest evidence currently supporting primary hyperparathyroidism and its other applications requiring cautious interpretation and further prospective validation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Medical Imaging and Theranostics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 6003 KB  
Review
Incidental Findings in [18F]-PSMA PET/CT for Prostate Cancer: Structured Reporting Across PET and Low-Dose CT, Clinical Relevance, and Cascade-Aware Management
by Katarzyna Sklinda, Marek Kasprowicz, Michał Małek, Bartlomiej Olczak, Tadeusz Budlewski, Malgorzata Kobylecka, Jerzy Walecki and Martyna Rajca
Uro 2026, 6(2), 17; https://doi.org/10.3390/uro6020017 - 17 Jun 2026
Viewed by 349
Abstract
[18F]-PSMA PET/CT is a high-impact modality for the staging and restaging of prostate cancer, but its wide anatomic coverage and tracer biology generate frequent incidental findings on both PET and the accompanying low-dose CT (LDCT). This narrative review is restricted in [...] Read more.
[18F]-PSMA PET/CT is a high-impact modality for the staging and restaging of prostate cancer, but its wide anatomic coverage and tracer biology generate frequent incidental findings on both PET and the accompanying low-dose CT (LDCT). This narrative review is restricted in scope to fluorine-18 PSMA tracers because tracer-specific biodistribution and pitfall profiles shape what is perceived as incidentaloma: how confidently lesions can be categorized, and how often borderline findings trigger downstream testing, particularly for skeletal foci with [18F]-PSMA-1007. Specifically, [18F]-PSMA-1007 shows substantially higher rates of focal unspecific bone uptake than [68Ga]-PSMA-11—reported in multicenter studies as affecting up to 40–50% of patients—which directly inflates the pool of potential incidentalomas and creates a tracer-specific false-positive problem with no parallel in gallium-68 practice. Additionally, [18F]-DCFPyL has different urinary clearance kinetics that affect bladder and ureteral uptake patterns, altering what qualifies as physiologic versus incidental in the pelvis. These differences mean that the threshold for Category B versus C classification—and the appropriate cascade-resistant language—must be tuned to the specific tracer in use. A framework built on [68Ga]-PSMA-11 data would systematically underestimate bone pitfall frequency in [18F]-PSMA-1007 practice and could therefore paradoxically increase rather than reduce cascades if applied uncritically across tracers. These biodistribution differences have direct and concrete consequences for reporting behaviour and downstream management. In [18F]-PSMA-1007 practice, a focal bone uptake without a CT correlate in a mechanically plausible location—such as an anterior rib or vertebral endplate—should trigger Category B language in the report conclusion: the finding is documented in the body with explicit safety netting (“most consistent with unspecific uptake; no routine workup unless interval growth, new pain, or aggressive CT morphology”), and no referral to bone scintigraphy or MRI is generated. Without tracer-specific awareness, the same finding would typically prompt a reflex bone scan or whole-body MRI referral, delaying definitive prostate cancer management by weeks and adding imaging costs without diagnostic gain. By contrast, in [68Ga]-PSMA-11 practice, an equivalent focal bone uptake without a CT correlate carries a higher prior probability of true metastatic disease given the lower background rate of unspecific uptake and should more often be reported at Category B with a lower threshold for escalation or more cautious language. For [18F]-DCFPyL, the higher urinary activity in the pelvis means that ureteral segments can mimic lymph node disease; recognizing this as a physiologic variant (Category C) rather than an equivocal nodal finding (Category B) avoids unnecessary pelvic MRI referrals that would otherwise be triggered by an uncontextualized report. In practical terms, the tracer-specific calibration of the overlay therefore changes not only the category assigned but also the specific safety-netting language and the escalation trigger, which directly modifies the downstream management pathway for each affected finding type. The scanned population—predominantly older men with a high prevalence of degenerative, inflammatory, and vascular abnormalities—creates substantial background noise that can drive low-value diagnostic cascades if incidental findings are communicated without actionability context. We integrate society-endorsed frameworks (EANM/SNMMI procedure guideline 2.0; E-PSMA; PSMA-RADS; and PROMISE/miTNM with miPSMA score) and propose a cascade-aware overlay for incidental findings that can be appended to existing PSMA reporting standards rather than replacing them. The A/B/C actionability overlay is a structured expert-consensus framework informed by existing evidence-based guidelines for specific finding types and by tracer-specific cohort data; it has not yet been prospectively validated as a standalone tool, and its current level of evidence is therefore analogous to a structured expert recommendation rather than an evidence-based clinical guideline. We operationalize a three-tier actionability scheme across PET- and CT-dominant findings, provide cascade-resistant language for conclusions, and clarify why SUVmax-only “probability scales” for lymph nodes are not recommended in routine reports. Three practical tables summarize PET incidental findings, lymph node reporting frameworks, and LDCT incidental findings, and two structured report templates are provided (concise and extended), with the extended version explicitly labelling actionability tiers and escalation triggers. Finally, we outline concrete AI use cases for standardization and triage while emphasizing governance to avoid the amplification of false positives and paradoxical growth of cascades. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 1090 KB  
Review
Evolving Systemic Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Pivotal Clinical Trials, Biomarker-Driven Combinations, and Practical Sequencing in the ARSI–PARP–Radioligand Era
by Takatoshi Somoto, Takanobu Utsumi, Rino Ikeda, Tatsuharu Sugimoto, Naoki Ishitsuka, Yodai Kadono, Takahide Noro, Yuta Suzuki, Shota Iijima, Yuka Sugizaki, Ryo Oka, Takumi Endo, Naoto Kamiya and Hiroyoshi Suzuki
Cancers 2026, 18(12), 1966; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18121966 - 17 Jun 2026
Viewed by 455
Abstract
Systemic therapy for metastatic prostate cancer is increasingly defined by upfront intensification and biomarker-guided mechanism switching. This narrative review synthesizes pivotal randomized trials, guideline recommendations, and implementation-focused literature across metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Evidence was organized [...] Read more.
Systemic therapy for metastatic prostate cancer is increasingly defined by upfront intensification and biomarker-guided mechanism switching. This narrative review synthesizes pivotal randomized trials, guideline recommendations, and implementation-focused literature across metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Evidence was organized around decision points at mCSPC diagnosis and at mCRPC transition, while incorporating biological mechanisms of resistance, including AR-axis reactivation, AR splice variants, lineage plasticity, DNA repair–hormone signaling interactions, and PSMA expression heterogeneity. In mCSPC, androgen deprivation therapy plus docetaxel and/or androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) improves survival, with triplet regimens favored for selected chemotherapy-fit patients with aggressive de novo disease. In mCRPC, cross-resistance limits routine ARSI-to-ARSI switching, and randomized data support mechanism-distinct options, including taxanes, PARP-based therapy in homologous recombination repair (HRR)-altered disease, and PSMA-targeted radioligand therapy (RLT) in selected PSMA-positive patients. As RLT moves earlier, PSMA heterogeneity, renal function, bone marrow reserve, and emerging dosimetry-based optimization should inform practical implementation. Ongoing trials are evaluating earlier theranostics, alpha-emitting radioligands, and biomarker-enriched combinations. An implementation-first approach that intensifies treatment when appropriate, tests early and acts on HRR results, uses PSMA PET to guide RLT, and preserves hematologic reserve may maximize access to multiple life-prolonging mechanisms. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Trials and Evolving Treatment Paradigms in Urologic Cancers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 855 KB  
Review
The Role of PET Tracers in Small-Cell Prostate Cancer (SCPC): An Overview in Clinical and Preclinical Settings
by Flaminia Vocaturo, Silvia Taralli, Valentina Scolozzi, Lucia Leccisotti and Carmelo Caldarella
Cancers 2026, 18(10), 1645; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18101645 - 20 May 2026
Viewed by 654
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Small-cell prostate cancer (SCPC) is a rare, aggressive variant of prostate cancer with poor prognosis, arising “de novo” or through lineage plasticity from conventional adenocarcinoma under androgen receptor-targeted therapies. Characterized by low PSA levels despite high tumor burden and visceral metastases, SCPC [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Small-cell prostate cancer (SCPC) is a rare, aggressive variant of prostate cancer with poor prognosis, arising “de novo” or through lineage plasticity from conventional adenocarcinoma under androgen receptor-targeted therapies. Characterized by low PSA levels despite high tumor burden and visceral metastases, SCPC poses diagnostic challenges with conventional and PSMA-targeted imaging due to variable tracer uptake. This narrative review aims to evaluate the role of PET/CT tracers in clinical and preclinical settings for SCPC diagnosis, staging, and management. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed and Scopus up to December 2025 using terms “PET OR positron emission tomography AND prostate OR prostatic AND small-cell NOT non-small-cell”. Eight studies (five clinical, three preclinical) on the role of PET/CT imaging in SCPC were included and analyzed for study design, population, tracers, and findings, with comparative evaluation of diagnostic performance across PET tracers. Results: Clinical studies showed that 11C-choline detects progression at low PSA but misses SCPC; 18F-FDG exhibited a high SUVmax value for distinguishing SCPC from adenocarcinomas with neuroendocrine differentiation, predicting poor survival; 68Ga-DOTATATE identified NEPC/SCPC with promising prognostic/therapeutic value for selected cases. Preclinical models evaluated 89Zr-tracers targeting DLL3 or CDCP1 (an antigen expressed in aggressive neuroendocrine tumours) and 18F-BnTP (a target of mitochondrial activity) in SCPC subtypes, focusing on translational imaging. Conclusions: From this review, although still based on limited literature evidence and mostly derived from retrospective and small SCPC sub-cohorts,18F-FDG PET/CT currently appears as the most reliable tracer for SCPC, aiding tumor detection and prognostication when PSMA/choline imaging fails. In the preclinical setting, DLL3/CDCP1-targeted agents emerge as promising theranostics tools. Multimodal imaging approach and prospective trials are needed for standardization and patient-based SCPC management. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in the Use of PET/CT and MRI in Prostate Cancer: 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 6620 KB  
Article
The M1 Paradox: Pro-Tumorigenic Effect of Macrophage Cytotoxicity in Prostate Cancer
by Olga V. Kovaleva, Vasiliy V. Sinyov, Madina A. Rashidova, Olga S. Malashenko, Polina A. Podlesnaya, Pavel B. Kopnin, Maria V. Vasileva, Alexander S. Balkin, Andrey Plotnikov and Alexei Gratchev
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27(8), 3655; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27083655 - 20 Apr 2026
Viewed by 675
Abstract
Macrophages are highly plastic cells of the tumor microenvironment, and although classically activated M1 macrophages are generally regarded as anti-tumor effectors, their prolonged cytotoxic activity may also promote tumor adaptation. In this study, we investigated whether sustained exposure of prostate cancer cells to [...] Read more.
Macrophages are highly plastic cells of the tumor microenvironment, and although classically activated M1 macrophages are generally regarded as anti-tumor effectors, their prolonged cytotoxic activity may also promote tumor adaptation. In this study, we investigated whether sustained exposure of prostate cancer cells to cytotoxic M1-like macrophages results in the selection of tumor cell populations with enhanced malignant properties. Macrophage-resistant derivatives of the human prostate cancer cell lines PC3 and DU145 were generated by repeated co-culture with cytotoxic THP-1-derived macrophages and characterized in vitro and in vivo. Macrophage-selected tumor cells showed increased proliferative activity and enhanced clonogenic survival. In vivo, these cells formed larger xenograft tumors with more aggressive histopathological features. At the same time, their migratory activity was not significantly increased, although they displayed partial epithelial–mesenchymal transition-like changes, including increased vimentin expression without a marked loss of epithelial markers. Transcriptomic profiling revealed coordinated inflammatory and adaptive reprogramming, characterized by the enrichment of cytokine- and immune-response pathways together with the suppression of metabolic and differentiation-associated programs. These changes were accompanied by the selective activation of p38 MAPK signaling, while sensitivity to paclitaxel remained unchanged. Taken together, the results indicate that macrophage cytotoxicity may act as a selective pressure promoting the emergence of inflammation-adapted tumor cell variants with increased malignant potential, supporting re-evaluation of the role of M1-like macrophages in tumor progression. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 3353 KB  
Article
Theranostic vNAR-Based Immunoconjugates Achieve Selective Intracellular Cisplatin Delivery in Embedded 3D HER2-Positive Breast Cancer In Vitro Model
by Andrea C. Alfonseca-Ladrón de Guevara, Alejandro Manzanares-Guzmán, Jessica A. Badillo-Mata, Mirna Burciaga-Flores, Pavel H. Lugo-Fabres and Tanya A. Camacho-Villegas
Pharmaceuticals 2026, 19(4), 633; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph19040633 - 17 Apr 2026
Viewed by 894
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Precise intracellular delivery of chemotherapeutics remains a major challenge in HER2-positive breast cancer, where intratumoral heterogeneity and limited tissue penetration constrain efficacy. A key contributor is the tumor-restricted epidermal growth factor receptor variant III (EGFRvIII), a constitutively active, ligand-independent mutant generated [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Precise intracellular delivery of chemotherapeutics remains a major challenge in HER2-positive breast cancer, where intratumoral heterogeneity and limited tissue penetration constrain efficacy. A key contributor is the tumor-restricted epidermal growth factor receptor variant III (EGFRvIII), a constitutively active, ligand-independent mutant generated by deletion of exons 2–7. Although classically associated with glioblastoma, lung (NSCLC), head/neck, and prostate cancers, EGFRvIII is also present in subsets of HER2-positive breast cancers, where low-abundance subclones drive aggressive phenotypes and attenuate therapeutic responses. HER2–EGFRvIII co-expression amplifies oncogenic signaling, supported by frequent co-expression in ErbB2-positive primary tumors and metastases, and by sustained receptor phosphorylation in the absence of EGFR gene amplification, depicting EGFRvIII as a compelling therapeutic target. Methods: We evaluated the shark-derived single-domain antibody vNAR R426 as a modular theranostic platform for receptor-mediated cisplatin delivery. Conjugation to cisplatin and fluorescein enabled simultaneous intracellular drug transport and immunofluorescence-based detection in EGFRvIII-positive SKBR3 cells and 3D spheroids. The compact vNAR-based immunoconjugates support efficient receptor recognition, internalization, and intracellular trafficking, features rarely achieved by conventional IgG antibodies. Results: vNARCDDP elicited robust, receptor-mediated cytotoxicity, achieving an IC50 of 2.68 µM—approximately 50-fold lower than that of free cisplatin—while unconjugated vNAR maintained scaffold biocompatibility. In three-dimensional spheroid models, the theranostic vNAR (vNARCDDP+FITC) exhibited deep and uniform penetration throughout tumor-like architectures, with immunofluorescence intensity closely correlating with regions of intracellular drug delivery and the initiation of cytotoxic responses. Notably, cisplatin conjugation did not impair tissue diffusion or receptor engagement, facilitating effective payload delivery to both peripheral and central cell populations. Conclusions: By integrating tumor-restricted targeting and efficient intracellular drug delivery within a modular single-domain scaffold, vNAR R426 represents a next-generation theranostic platform capable of addressing intratumoral heterogeneity. This approach combines potent cytotoxic activity with immunofluorescence-based detection, thereby advancing the rational design of precision therapeutics for HER2-positive breast cancer. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

15 pages, 6568 KB  
Article
From Plastics to Prognosis: ANO4 Susceptibility Links Phthalate Exposure to Prostate Cancer Progression
by Chi-Fen Chang, Shu-Pin Huang, Yei-Tsung Chen, Lih-Chyang Chen, Chao-Yuan Huang, Chia-Cheng Yu, Victor C. Lin, Te-Ling Lu and Bo-Ying Bao
Diagnostics 2026, 16(5), 794; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16050794 - 7 Mar 2026
Viewed by 673
Abstract
Background/Objective: Di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate and its bioactive metabolite mono-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (MEHP) are ubiquitous endocrine-disrupting chemicals implicated in carcinogenesis. However, the molecular mechanisms linking MEHP exposure, host genetic susceptibility, and prostate cancer progression remain incompletely defined. Methods: We integrated transcriptomic profiling of MEHP-exposed human prostate [...] Read more.
Background/Objective: Di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate and its bioactive metabolite mono-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (MEHP) are ubiquitous endocrine-disrupting chemicals implicated in carcinogenesis. However, the molecular mechanisms linking MEHP exposure, host genetic susceptibility, and prostate cancer progression remain incompletely defined. Methods: We integrated transcriptomic profiling of MEHP-exposed human prostate epithelial cells with a genetic association study of 630 patients with prostate cancer receiving androgen deprivation therapy. MEHP-responsive genes were identified from public microarray datasets and subjected to pathway enrichment analyses. Germline single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in MEHP-regulated genes were evaluated for their association with progression-free survival, overall survival, and cancer-specific survival. The clinical and functional relevance of the key genes was further assessed using large-scale public prostate cancer expression datasets. Results: MEHP exposure induced widespread transcriptional reprogramming, prominently suppressing focal adhesion and cell–matrix interaction pathways. Genetic analyses identified multiple prognostically relevant SNPs within MEHP-responsive genes, with anoctamin 4 (ANO4) variants showing consistent associations across all clinical endpoints. The minor allele of rs17485225 in ANO4 was significantly associated with reduced all-cause and prostate cancer-specific mortality. Pooled analyses revealed reduced ANO4 expression levels in prostate cancer tissues and improved survival in patients with high ANO4 expression levels. Pathway analyses linked low ANO4 expression levels with enhanced cell cycle activity and compromised cell adhesion. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that ANO4 may act as a mediator of MEHP-associated prostate cancer progression and support a gene–environment interaction model in which environmental toxicant exposure and germline variation converge on focal adhesion dysregulation to potentially contribute to aggressive disease. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Predictive Biomarkers in Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 8697 KB  
Review
Radiomics-Based Characterization of Aggressive Prostate Cancer Variants: Diagnostic Challenges and Opportunities
by Katarzyna Sklinda, Martyna Rajca, Marek Kasprowicz, Łukasz Michałowski, Michał Małek, Bartłomiej Olczak and Jerzy Walecki
Cancers 2026, 18(5), 780; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18050780 - 28 Feb 2026
Viewed by 890
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Aggressive variants of prostate cancer pose significant diagnostic and prognostic challenges due to atypical imaging appearances, variable prostate-specific antigen behavior, and distinct molecular features. Conventional imaging may underestimate their biological aggressiveness. This review aimed to synthesize current evidence on imaging characteristics, biomarker [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Aggressive variants of prostate cancer pose significant diagnostic and prognostic challenges due to atypical imaging appearances, variable prostate-specific antigen behavior, and distinct molecular features. Conventional imaging may underestimate their biological aggressiveness. This review aimed to synthesize current evidence on imaging characteristics, biomarker dynamics, tumor localization, histology, and radiomic features of aggressive prostate cancer variants, and to evaluate the potential role of radiomics in early recognition and risk stratification. Methods: A structured narrative review was performed of studies reporting imaging, clinical, and molecular features of aggressive prostate cancer variants. Imaging modalities included multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography with prostate-specific membrane antigen or fluorodeoxyglucose, bone scintigraphy, and transrectal ultrasound. Data on prostate-specific antigen levels and kinetics, intraprostatic tumor location, tumor size, metastatic patterns, and molecular alterations were extracted. Evidence for rare entities such as basaloid and primary squamous carcinomas was derived from published case reports and series, while selected variants were complemented by institutional imaging and histopathologic observations. Results: Neuroendocrine and small cell carcinomas frequently showed low prostate-specific antigen levels, high fluorodeoxyglucose uptake, low prostate-specific membrane antigen expression, and central or transitional zone involvement with large tumor size at diagnosis. Ductal adenocarcinoma demonstrated marked diffusion restriction and elevated prostate-specific antigen, whereas basal cell carcinoma often appeared inconspicuous on conventional imaging. Radiomic analysis consistently captured tumor heterogeneity and spatial complexity beyond standard qualitative metrics. Conclusions: Aggressive prostate cancer variants represent a diagnostic blind spot in routine imaging. Radiomics offers complementary quantitative information that may improve early detection, subtype differentiation, and risk stratification when integrated into multimodal imaging workflows. Further prospective and radiogenomic studies are warranted to validate these findings. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Radiomics in Cancer Imaging: Theory and Applications in Solid Tumours)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1795 KB  
Case Report
CDX2 Expression and Fluoropyrimidine Response in Rare Non-GI Tumors: A Three-Case Series
by Riham Suleiman, Andrea Dipp Garcia, Binav Baral, Thorvardur Halfdanarson and Harry Fuentes-Bayne
Curr. Oncol. 2026, 33(2), 126; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol33020126 - 21 Feb 2026
Viewed by 820
Abstract
Caudal type homeobox 2 (CDX2) is an intestine-specific transcription factor that serves as a diagnostic marker of enteric differentiation and may also reflect tumor behavior and therapeutic susceptibility. Emerging evidence suggests that CDX2 expression may predict sensitivity to fluoropyrimidine-based therapy independent of tissue [...] Read more.
Caudal type homeobox 2 (CDX2) is an intestine-specific transcription factor that serves as a diagnostic marker of enteric differentiation and may also reflect tumor behavior and therapeutic susceptibility. Emerging evidence suggests that CDX2 expression may predict sensitivity to fluoropyrimidine-based therapy independent of tissue of origin. We report a retrospective case series of three patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma (aggressive variant prostate, minor salivary gland, and intestinal-type sinonasal tract) exhibiting strong CDX2 nuclear expression. In all cases, tumors were refractory to or lacked established standard systemic therapy. Treatment decisions were informed by the CDX2-positive enteric phenotype, leading to the initiation of fluoropyrimidine-based regimens. Response was assessed using PET-CT and MRI. All three patients achieved marked metabolic and clinical responses, including a sustained complete metabolic response in the prostate cancer case and durable disease control in the salivary gland and sinonasal tumors. These findings highlight CDX2 as a potential biomarker requiring validation, which may identify tumors intrinsically susceptible to fluoropyrimidines regardless of anatomical origin. CDX2 immunohistochemistry is widely available and inexpensive, and may complement genomic profiling in rare malignancies or in settings where standard treatment algorithms are limited. This report is hypothesis-generating and not intended to estimate response rates or treatment efficacy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Oncology Biomarkers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 1072 KB  
Review
PD-L1 Expression in Prostate Cancer: Anatomopathological Features, Methodological Pitfalls, and Therapeutic Potential
by Ludovica Pepe, Cristina Pizzimenti, Pietro Tralongo, Valeria Zuccalà, Antonio Ieni, Pietro Pepe, Gabriele Ricciardi, Vincenzo Cianci, Cristina Mondello, Maurizio Martini, Guido Fadda and Vincenzo Fiorentino
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27(4), 1797; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27041797 - 13 Feb 2026
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1139
Abstract
Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) has become a central biomarker and therapeutic target across multiple solid tumors, yet its clinical meaning in prostate cancer (PCa) remains unsettled. PCa is commonly described as an immunologically ‘cold’ malignancy, characterized by limited baseline cytotoxic T-cell infiltration and [...] Read more.
Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) has become a central biomarker and therapeutic target across multiple solid tumors, yet its clinical meaning in prostate cancer (PCa) remains unsettled. PCa is commonly described as an immunologically ‘cold’ malignancy, characterized by limited baseline cytotoxic T-cell infiltration and a tumor microenvironment (TME) shaped by myeloid-driven suppression and low neoantigen load in many cases. Against this background, PD-L1 expression in PCa is typically low in untreated primary tumors but can increase in aggressive variants, advanced stages, and metastatic castration-resistant disease, where therapy pressure and microenvironmental cues may select for immune-evasive phenotypes. The literature is further complicated by major analytic variability, including differences in antibody clones and platforms, scoring algorithms (tumor proportion score, combined positive score, immune-cell scoring), cut-offs, tissue sites and timing, and pre-analytical variables such as fixation and decalcification. Collectively, available studies suggest that higher PD-L1 expression tends to be associated with adverse clinicopathological features and may enrich for responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors in selected settings, but PD-L1 immunohistochemistry alone is insufficient as a stand-alone predictive tool in unselected patients. This review synthesizes the biological drivers of PD-L1 regulation in PCa, dissects key methodological sources of heterogeneity in PD-L1 assessment, summarizes clinicopathological and therapeutic correlations, and outlines emerging biomarkers and approaches (including mismatch repair deficiency/microsatellite instability, tumor mutational burden, gene-expression signatures, liquid biopsies, and neuro-immune interactions) that may enable more actionable patient stratification. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pathogenesis and Treatment of Prostate Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 3005 KB  
Article
Phenotypic Plasticity and Androgen Receptor Bypass Drive Cross-Resistance to Apalutamide in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Cell Models
by Iris Simon, Jose Manuel Sanchez-Manas, Sonia Perales, Gonzalo Martinez-Navajas, Jorge Ceron-Hernandez and Pedro J. Real
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(13), 5939; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26135939 - 20 Jun 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1961
Abstract
The treatment of choice for prostate cancer is androgen deprivation (ADT) and novel hormonal agents such as Abiraterone, Enzalutamide, or Apalutamide. Initially, this therapy is highly effective, but a significant challenge arises as most patients eventually develop resistance, resulting in castration-resistant prostate cancer [...] Read more.
The treatment of choice for prostate cancer is androgen deprivation (ADT) and novel hormonal agents such as Abiraterone, Enzalutamide, or Apalutamide. Initially, this therapy is highly effective, but a significant challenge arises as most patients eventually develop resistance, resulting in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Furthermore, the sequential use of these drugs can lead to cross-resistance, diminishing their efficacy. Tumor heterogeneity plays a pivotal role in the development of resistance to different treatments. This study utilized cellular models of CRPC to assess the response to Apalutamide when it was administered as a second- or third-line treatment. Functional and genetic analyses were conducted in various CRPC cell models exposed to Apalutamide. These analyses included real-time cell monitoring assays, flow cytometry, clonogenicity assays, and RT-qPCR. CRPC cell models were capable of continued proliferation, maintained cell cycle profiles similar to those of untreated cells, and retained their clonogenic potential. Cross-resistance to Apalutamide in models of ADT, ADT plus Enzalutamide, or Abiraterone resistance did not correlate with the expression levels of AR-V7 and AR-V9 variants. Gene expression analysis of resistant prostate cancer cell lines revealed that treatment with Apalutamide induced the emergence of more aggressive phenotypes, including cancer stem cells or neuroendocrine differentiation profiles. Most CRPC cell models developed cross-resistance to Apalutamide and were able to proliferate and retain their clonogenic capability. Apalutamide resistance was not linked to the expression of AR-V7 or AR-V9 variants but was instead associated to bypass of AR signaling pathway and the emergence of more aggressive expression profiles. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Pathology, Diagnostics, and Therapeutics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 955 KB  
Review
SIU-ICUD: Germline Genetic Susceptibility to Prostate Cancer: Utility and Clinical Implementation
by James T. Kearns, Annabelle Ashworth, Elena Castro, Rosalind A. Eeles, Liesel M. FitzGerald, Peter J. Hulick, Stacy Loeb, Christian P. Pavlovich, Timothy R. Rebbeck, Susan T. Vadaparampil, Zhuqing Shi, Huy Tran, Jun Wei, Jianfeng Xu and Brian T. Helfand
Soc. Int. Urol. J. 2025, 6(3), 45; https://doi.org/10.3390/siuj6030045 - 13 Jun 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2139
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Prostate cancer is the most common cancer among men globally and a leading cause of cancer-related death. Germline genetic evaluation is increasingly recognized as essential for men with high-risk features such as a strong family history or advanced disease. Methods: Comprehensive genetic [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Prostate cancer is the most common cancer among men globally and a leading cause of cancer-related death. Germline genetic evaluation is increasingly recognized as essential for men with high-risk features such as a strong family history or advanced disease. Methods: Comprehensive genetic risk assessment should integrate three components: family history (FH), rare pathogenic mutations (RPMs), and polygenic risk scores (PRS). RPMs in DNA repair genes (e.g., BRCA2, CHEK2, ATM) can inform screening, prognosis, and treatment strategies, particularly for metastatic or aggressive disease. PRS, derived from common genetic variants, provides a personalized and independent measure of prostate cancer risk and may guide decisions on screening intensity and timing. Results: Although PRS cannot yet differentiate between indolent and aggressive cancer, it has the potential to stratify men into low and high-risk categories more effectively than FH or RPMs alone. Knowledge of specific RPMs can influence treatment decisions in clinically advanced prostate cancer. Challenges in clinical implementation include limited provider awareness, underutilization of genetic counseling, and lack of diversity in genomic datasets, which can lead to misdiagnoses. Emerging technologies and digital tools are being developed to streamline genetic testing and counseling. Population-level strategies and tailored screening protocols based on genetic risk are under active investigation. Conclusions: While early evidence suggests high satisfaction with genetic testing among patients, further studies in diverse populations are needed. Integration of germline genetic information into prostate cancer management offers promising avenues for personalized screening, surveillance, and treatment, ultimately aiming to reduce morbidity and mortality. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 735 KB  
Article
Integrating Aggressive-Variant Prostate Cancer-Associated Tumor Suppressor Gene Status with Clinical Variables to Refine Prognosis and Predict Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitor Response in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Setting
by Martino Pedrani, Giuseppe Salfi, Sara Merler, Irene Testi, Chiara Maria Agrippina Clerici, Giovanna Pecoraro, Luis Castelo-Branco, Fabio Turco, Luigi Tortola, Ursula Vogl, Silke Gillessen, Jean-Philippe Theurillat, Thomas Zilli and Ricardo Pereira Mestre
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(11), 5309; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26115309 - 31 May 2025
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2153
Abstract
Alterations in aggressive-variant prostate cancer-associated tumor suppressor genes (AVPC-TSG: TP53, RB1, PTEN) are related with androgen insensitivity and aggressive disease. However, their prognostic and predictive role in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) is unclear. This single-center retrospective study assesses the [...] Read more.
Alterations in aggressive-variant prostate cancer-associated tumor suppressor genes (AVPC-TSG: TP53, RB1, PTEN) are related with androgen insensitivity and aggressive disease. However, their prognostic and predictive role in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) is unclear. This single-center retrospective study assesses the value of AVPC-TSG alterations in refining prognosis and predicting the response to androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) in mHSPC. We included 158 patients with genomic tumor sequencing undergoing treatment for mHSPC between 2013 and 2023. We compared patients with AVPC-TSGalt tumors (≥1 alteration in TP53, RB1, or PTEN/PI3K/AKT pathway genes) to those with AVPC-TSGwt tumors (i.e., without alterations in AVPC-TSG). Cox analyses were performed for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). AVPC-TSGwt status was associated with improved PFS and OS in both univariate and multivariate (MV) analyses (MV PFS: HR 0.58, 95%CI: 0.38–0.89, p = 0.012; MV OS: HR 0.48, 95%CI: 0.26–0.91, p = 0.025). AVPC-TSGalt mHSPC patients seemed to derive no PFS benefit from ARPI addition (PFS: HR 1.13, 95%CI: 0.58–2.19, p = 0.721), while AVPC-TSGwt mHSPC patients did (PFS: HR 0.51, 95%CI: 0.28–0.93 p = 0.029). Integrating AVPC-TSG status with CHAARTED volume criteria, we identified three distinct subgroups: “good risk” (AVPC-TSGwt low volume), “intermediate risk” (either AVPC-TSGalt low volume or AVPC-TSGwt high volume), and “poor risk” (AVPC-TSGalt high volume) with median PFS of 46.8, 28.2, and 15.7 months, respectively. Only the “intermediate risk” subgroup seemed to derive PFS benefit from ARPI addition (HR 0.36, 95%CI: 0.19–0.70, p = 0.002). AVPC-TSG status assessment refines prognosis and may predict PFS benefits of ARPIs in mHSPC. AVPC-TSGalt mHSPC patients should be considered for clinical trials as they may not benefit from current standard approaches. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Research in Prostate Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 5751 KB  
Article
Targeting Aggressive Prostate Carcinoma Cells with Mesothelin-CAR-T Cells
by Apolline de Testas de Folmont, Angèle Fauvel, Francis Vacherot, Pascale Soyeux, Abdérémane Abdou, Salem Chouaib and Stéphane Terry
Biomedicines 2025, 13(5), 1215; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13051215 - 16 May 2025
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1794
Abstract
Background: Advancing chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy for solid tumors remains a major challenge in cancer immunotherapy. Prostate cancer (PCa), particularly in its aggressive forms, may be a suitable target for CAR-T therapy given the range of associated tumor antigens. [...] Read more.
Background: Advancing chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy for solid tumors remains a major challenge in cancer immunotherapy. Prostate cancer (PCa), particularly in its aggressive forms, may be a suitable target for CAR-T therapy given the range of associated tumor antigens. However, due to the high plasticity and heterogeneity of aggressive PCa and the complexity of the tumor environment, there is a need to broaden the repertoire of targetable antigens and deepen our understanding of CAR-T behavior in stressed microenvironmental conditions. Growing evidence supports mesothelin as a promising cancer-associated marker and a compelling target for CAR-T cell approaches in solid tumors. Objectives and Methods: Here, we employed gene expression datasets to investigate mesothelin expression in both primary and metastatic PCa tumors. Additionally, we evaluated mesothelin expression across various preclinical PCa models and assessed the therapeutic efficacy of second-generation mesothelin-targeted CAR-T (meso-CAR-T) cells under both normoxic and hypoxic conditions, with hypoxia as a representative tumor-associated stress condition. Results: Our results revealed a significant enrichment of mesothelin in 3–10% of metastatic prostate tumors, contrasting with its minimal expression in primary tumors. In line with these findings, we observed increased mesothelin expression in an aggressive variant of the 22Rv1 cell line, which displayed an epithelial–mesenchymal plasticity (EMP) phenotype. Meso-CAR-T cells demonstrated potent cytotoxicity and remarkable selectivity toward these carcinoma cells under both severe hypoxia (1% O2) or normoxia (21% O2), highlighting their ability to withstand metabolic stress within the tumor microenvironment. Conclusions: Our study underscores the potential of meso-CAR-T cells as a promising strategy for targeting specific subtypes of metastatic prostate cancer. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Development of Cancer Immunotherapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 1542 KB  
Review
Ancestry-Specific DNA Damage Repair Gene Mutations and Prostate Cancer
by Talaibek Borbiev, Kevin Babcock, Kayleigh Sinopole, Gregory T. Chesnut and Gyorgy Petrovics
Cancers 2025, 17(4), 682; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17040682 - 18 Feb 2025
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 8825
Abstract
This review is intended to reflect the currently available literature on both clinically significant germline mutations in DNA damage repair (DDR) genes as well as the importance of ancestral diversity in the pathogenesis of prostate cancer (PCa). The second most prevalent cancer worldwide [...] Read more.
This review is intended to reflect the currently available literature on both clinically significant germline mutations in DNA damage repair (DDR) genes as well as the importance of ancestral diversity in the pathogenesis of prostate cancer (PCa). The second most prevalent cancer worldwide in men is PCa, causing significant morbidity and mortality in its advanced stage. Emerging data highlight the substantial role of germline mutations of DDR genes in PCa pathogenesis, especially in progression to aggressive forms of the disease. Germline genetic testing is recognized as a necessary tool for efficient, individualized patient care. NCCR guidelines recommend inquiring about the family history of PCa and known germline variants and, if indicated, proceeding with germline multigene testing followed by post-test genetic counseling. Depending on the germline mutations in HR repair genes or in MMR genes, specific treatment options may provide clinical benefit. We will discuss specific germline mutations that are involved in PCa progression and prognosis in racially diverse populations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights into Urologic Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop