Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (480)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = adverse effects (AEs)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
34 pages, 1543 KiB  
Review
Treatment Strategies for Cutaneous and Oral Mucosal Side Effects of Oncological Treatment in Breast Cancer: A Comprehensive Review
by Sanja Brnić, Bruno Špiljak, Lucija Zanze, Ema Barac, Robert Likić and Liborija Lugović-Mihić
Biomedicines 2025, 13(8), 1901; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13081901 - 4 Aug 2025
Viewed by 240
Abstract
Cutaneous and oral mucosal adverse events (AEs) are among the most common non-hematologic toxicities observed during breast cancer treatment. These complications arise across various therapeutic modalities including chemotherapy, targeted therapy, hormonal therapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy. Although often underrecognized compared with systemic side effects, [...] Read more.
Cutaneous and oral mucosal adverse events (AEs) are among the most common non-hematologic toxicities observed during breast cancer treatment. These complications arise across various therapeutic modalities including chemotherapy, targeted therapy, hormonal therapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy. Although often underrecognized compared with systemic side effects, dermatologic and mucosal toxicities can severely impact the patients’ quality of life, leading to psychosocial distress, pain, and reduced treatment adherence. In severe cases, these toxicities may necessitate dose reductions, treatment delays, or discontinuation, thereby compromising oncologic outcomes. The growing use of precision medicine and novel targeted agents has broadened the spectrum of AEs, with some therapies linked to distinct dermatologic syndromes and mucosal complications such as mucositis, xerostomia, and lichenoid reactions. Early detection, accurate classification, and timely multidisciplinary management are essential for mitigating these effects. This review provides a comprehensive synthesis of current knowledge on cutaneous and oral mucosal toxicities associated with modern breast cancer therapies. Particular attention is given to clinical presentation, underlying pathophysiology, incidence, and evidence-based prevention and management strategies. We also explore emerging approaches, including nanoparticle-based delivery systems and personalized interventions, which may reduce toxicity without compromising therapeutic efficacy. By emphasizing the integration of dermatologic and mucosal care, this review aims to support clinicians in preserving treatment adherence and enhancing the overall therapeutic experience in breast cancer patients. The novelty of this review lies in its dual focus on cutaneous and oral complications across all major therapeutic classes, including recent biologic and immunotherapeutic agents, and its emphasis on multidisciplinary, patient-centered strategies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Biology and Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1033 KiB  
Article
Transcranial Pulse Stimulation in Alzheimer’s: Long-Term Feasibility and a Multifocal Treatment Approach
by Celine Cont-Richter, Nathalie Stute, Anastasia Galli, Christina Schulte and Lars Wojtecki
Brain Sci. 2025, 15(8), 830; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15080830 - 1 Aug 2025
Viewed by 253
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Neuromodulation is under investigation as a possibly effective add-on therapy in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). While transcranial pulse stimulation (TPS) has shown positive short-term effects, long-term effects have not yet been fully explored. This study aims to evaluate the long-term feasibility, safety, and [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Neuromodulation is under investigation as a possibly effective add-on therapy in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). While transcranial pulse stimulation (TPS) has shown positive short-term effects, long-term effects have not yet been fully explored. This study aims to evaluate the long-term feasibility, safety, and potential cognitive benefits of TPS over one year in patients with Alzheimer’s disease, focusing on domains such as memory, speech, orientation, visuo-construction, and depressive symptoms. Methods: We analyzed preliminary data from the first ten out of thirty-five patients enrolled in a prospective TPS study who completed one year of follow-up and were included in a dedicated long-term database. The protocol consisted of six initial TPS sessions over two weeks, followed by monthly booster sessions delivering 6000 pulses each for twelve months. Patients underwent regular neuropsychological assessments using the Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS), Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II). All adverse events (AEs) were documented and monitored throughout the study. Results: Adverse events occurred in less than 1% of stimulation sessions and mainly included mild focal pain or transient unpleasant sensations, as well as some systemic behavioral or vigilance changes, particularly in patients with underlying medical conditions, with some potentially related to the device’s stimulation as adverse device reactions (ADRs). Cognitive test results showed significant improvement after the initial stimulation cycle (ADAS total improved significantly after the first stimulation cycle (M_pre = 28.44, M_post = 18.56; p = 0.001, d = 0.80, 95% CI (0.36, 1.25)), with stable scores across all domains over one year. Improvements were most notable in memory, speech, and mood. Conclusions: TPS appears to be a generally safe and feasible add-on treatment for AD, although careful patient selection and monitoring are advised. While a considerable number of participants were lost to follow-up for various reasons, adverse events and lack of treatment effect were unlikely primary causes. A multifocal stimulation approach (F-TOP2) is proposed to enhance effects across more cognitive domains. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Noninvasive Neuromodulation Applications in Research and Clinics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1474 KiB  
Review
Treatment Strategies for First-Line PD-L1-Unselected Advanced NSCLC: A Comparative Review of Immunotherapy-Based Regimens by PD-L1 Expression and Clinical Indication
by Blerina Resuli, Diego Kauffmann-Guerrero, Maria Nieves Arredondo Lasso, Jürgen Behr and Amanda Tufman
Diagnostics 2025, 15(15), 1937; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15151937 - 31 Jul 2025
Viewed by 425
Abstract
Background: Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Advances in screening, diagnosis, and management have transformed clinical practice, particularly with the integration of immunotherapy and target therapies. Methods: A systematic literature search was carried out for the period between October [...] Read more.
Background: Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Advances in screening, diagnosis, and management have transformed clinical practice, particularly with the integration of immunotherapy and target therapies. Methods: A systematic literature search was carried out for the period between October 2016 to September 2024. Phase II and III randomized trials evaluating ICI monotherapy, ICI–chemotherapy combinations, and dual ICI regimens in patients with advanced NSCLC were included. Outcomes of interest included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment-related adverse events (AEs). Results: PD-1-targeted therapies demonstrated superior OS compared to PD-L1-based regimens, with cemiplimab monotherapyranking highest for OS benefit (posterior probability: 90%), followed by sintilimab plus platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) and pemetrexed—PBC. PFS atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and PBC, and camrelizumab plus PBC were the most effective regimens. ICI–chemotherapy combinations achieved higher ORRs but were associated with greater toxicity. The most favorable safety profiles were observed with cemiplimab, nivolumab, and avelumab monotherapy, while atezolizumab plus PBC and sugemalimab plus PBC carried the highest toxicity burdens. Conclusions: In PD-L1-unselected advanced NSCLC, PD-1 blockade—particularly cemiplimab monotherapy—and rationally designed ICI–chemotherapy combinations represent the most efficacious treatment strategies. Balancing efficacy with safety remains critical, especially in the absence of predictive biomarkers. These findings support a patient-tailored approach to immunotherapy and highlight the need for further biomarker-driven and real-world investigations to optimize treatment selection. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Lung Cancer: Screening, Diagnosis and Management: 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1279 KiB  
Article
Real-World Toxicity and Effectiveness Study of Abemaciclib in Greek Patients with Hormone Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Breast Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Study
by Elena Fountzilas, Eleni Aravantinou-Fatorou, Katerina Dadouli, Panagiota Economopoulou, Dimitrios Tryfonopoulos, Anastasia Vernadou, Eleftherios Vorrias, Anastasios Vagionas, Adamantia Nikolaidi, Sofia Karageorgopoulou, Anna Koumarianou, Ioannis Boukovinas, Davide Mauri, Stefania Kokkali, Athina Christopoulou, Nikolaos Tsoukalas, Avraam Assi, Nikolaos Spathas, Paris Kosmidis, Angelos Koutras, George Fountzilas and Amanda Psyrriadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Cancers 2025, 17(15), 2543; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17152543 - 31 Jul 2025
Viewed by 157
Abstract
Background/Objectives: This study aimed to assess real-world toxicity and efficacy data of patients with early and advanced breast cancer (BC) who received treatment with abemaciclib. Methods: This was a prospective/retrospective multi-institutional collection of clinicopathological, toxicity, and outcome data from patients with early or [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: This study aimed to assess real-world toxicity and efficacy data of patients with early and advanced breast cancer (BC) who received treatment with abemaciclib. Methods: This was a prospective/retrospective multi-institutional collection of clinicopathological, toxicity, and outcome data from patients with early or metastatic hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative BC who received treatment with abemaciclib in combination with endocrine therapy in departments of oncology in Greece. Treatment combinations of abemaciclib with any endocrine therapy were accepted. The primary end point was toxicity rate in all patients of the study. Results: From June/2021 to May/2024, 245 women received abemaciclib/endocrine combination therapy; the median age was 57 years. Of these, 169 (69%) received abemaciclib as adjuvant therapy for early-stage disease, while 76 (31%) were treated for advanced BC. At the time of the data cutoff, 133 (84.7%) patients remained in the 2-year treatment period. The most common adverse event (AE) was diarrhea (51%), primarily Grade ≤ 2. Dose modifications due to AEs were required in 19.2% of cases, while treatment discontinuation occurred in 5.1%. There was no difference in dose modification/discontinuation rates between older patients (>65 years) and the remaining patients. For early-stage BC patients, the 2-year DFS and OS rates were 90.8% and 100%, respectively. In patients with advanced cancer (70, 30.8%), 1-year PFS and OS rates were 78% and 96.3%, respectively. Conclusions: This study confirms the safety and effectiveness of abemaciclib in alignment with registrational trials offering valuable insights into toxicity management and clinical outcomes in routine practice without identifying new safety concerns. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04985058. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Survivorship and Quality of Life)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1591 KiB  
Systematic Review
Efficacy of Adding Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors to Chemotherapy Plus Bevacizumab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
by Fumihiko Ando, Akihisa Matsuda, Yuji Miyamoto, Yu Sunakawa, Tomoko Asatsuma-Okumura, Yoshiko Iwai and Hiroshi Yoshida
Cancers 2025, 17(15), 2538; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17152538 - 31 Jul 2025
Viewed by 195
Abstract
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have limited efficacy in proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) and microsatellite stability (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or cytotoxic chemotherapy can boost immunogenicity and has the potential to upregulate ICI efficacy. Methods: [...] Read more.
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have limited efficacy in proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) and microsatellite stability (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or cytotoxic chemotherapy can boost immunogenicity and has the potential to upregulate ICI efficacy. Methods: A comprehensive electronic literature search was conducted up to April 2025 to identify randomized controlled trials comparing cytotoxic chemotherapy plus bevacizumab with or without ICI. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and severe adverse events (AEs: grade 3 or more). A meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) or odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Four studies involving 986 patients (With-ICI group, n = 651; Without-ICI group, n = 335) were included. The meta-analysis demonstrated a significant improvement in PFS in the With-ICI group compared with the Without-ICI group, with an HR of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.70–0.96, p = 0.01) without statistical heterogeneity. No significant improvements were observed between the With- and Without-ICI groups in OS and ORR meta-analyses, but the With-ICI group had a favorable trend in OS. A significant increase in serious AEs was not observed in the With-ICI group. Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests a potential benefit of adding ICIs to chemotherapy plus bevacizumab in pMMR mCRC; however, the evidence remains preliminary and hypothesis-generating, warranting further investigation in biomarker-driven trials and clarification of long-term outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Systematic Review or Meta-Analysis in Cancer Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 1813 KiB  
Review
The Review on Adverse Effects of Energy Drinks and Their Potential Drug Interactions
by Lukasz Dobrek
Nutrients 2025, 17(15), 2435; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17152435 - 25 Jul 2025
Viewed by 987
Abstract
Background: Energy drinks (EDs) are non-alcoholic, functional beverages sold worldwide in more than 165 countries. These products are very popular and often consumed by children, teenagers, and young adults to improve physical performance, reduce drowsiness, and improve memory and concentration with increased intellectual [...] Read more.
Background: Energy drinks (EDs) are non-alcoholic, functional beverages sold worldwide in more than 165 countries. These products are very popular and often consumed by children, teenagers, and young adults to improve physical performance, reduce drowsiness, and improve memory and concentration with increased intellectual effort. However, their consumption is associated with an increased risk of various health consequences. Objectives: The purpose of this non-systematic review was to discuss the components of EDs and their effects, summarize the AEs reported in the literature associated with the consumption of EDs, and briefly characterize the possible ED-related drug interactions. Methods: Scientific evidence was extracted by searching the databases PubMed and Google Scholar. In addition, the reference lists of the retrieved papers were reviewed and cross-referenced to reveal additional relevant scientific evidence. Results: The most common ingredients in EDs are caffeine, taurine, glucuronolactone, B vitamins, the vitamin-like compound inositol, and sweeteners (sugar, fructose, glucose–fructose syrup or artificial sweeteners). Although it is difficult to conclusively prove a cause-and-effect relationship between the consumption of EDs and the observed pathophysiological abnormalities, most scientific evidence (mostly clinical case reports) indicates that both occasional and especially chronic use of EDs is associated with the occurrence of numerous adverse effects (AEs). Among these, the best documented AEs are those on the cardiovascular system. It should also be noted that the components of EDs (primarily caffeine) may have drug interactions; therefore, EDs may be an important factor influencing the safety of pharmacotherapy in patients consuming EDs. Conclusions: Consuming energy drinks lead to various health problems and may interfere with pharmacotherapy due to the potential development of drug interactions. Due to the widespread availability of EDs, their suggestive advertising aimed at the youngest customers, and ambiguous regulations, new legislative policies are required to limit the widespread consumption of such products and their negative health effects. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Food Security, Food Insecurity, and Nutritional Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1751 KiB  
Article
Causal Inference of Adverse Drug Events in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Pharmacovigilance Study
by Hongmei Li, Xiaojun He, Cui Chen, Qiao Ni, Linghao Ni, Jiawei Zhou and Bin Peng
Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18(8), 1084; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18081084 - 22 Jul 2025
Viewed by 260
Abstract
Objective: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive and life-threatening disease. Adverse events (AEs) related to its drug treatment seriously damaged the patient’s health. This study aims to clarify the causal relationship between PAH drugs and these AEs by combining pharmacovigilance signal detection [...] Read more.
Objective: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive and life-threatening disease. Adverse events (AEs) related to its drug treatment seriously damaged the patient’s health. This study aims to clarify the causal relationship between PAH drugs and these AEs by combining pharmacovigilance signal detection with the Bayesian causal network model. Methods: Patient data were obtained from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), covering reports from 2013 to 2023. In accordance with standard pharmacovigilance methodologies, disproportionality analysis was performed to detect signals. Target drugs were selected based on the following criteria: number of reports (a) ≥ 3, proportional reporting ratio (PRR) ≥ 2, and chi-square (χ2) ≥ 4. Bayesian causal network models were then constructed to estimate causal relationships. The do-calculus and adjustment formula were applied to calculate the causal effects between drugs and AEs. Results: Signal detection revealed that Ambrisentan, Bosentan, and Iloprost were associated with serious AEs, including death, dyspnea, pneumonia, and edema. For Ambrisentan, the top-ranked adverse drug events (ADEs) based on average causal effect (ACE) were peripheral swelling (ACE = 0.032) and anemia (ACE = 0.021). For Iloprost, the most prominent ADE was hyperthyroidism (ACE = 0.048). Conclusions: This study quantifies causal drug–event relationships in PAH using Bayesian causal networks. The findings offer valuable evidence regarding the clinical safety of PAH medications, thereby improving patient health outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pharmacology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2015 KiB  
Systematic Review
Immunotherapy and Advanced Vulvar Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survival and Safety Outcomes
by Mauro Francesco Pio Maiorano, Vera Loizzi, Gennaro Cormio and Brigida Anna Maiorano
Cancers 2025, 17(14), 2392; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17142392 - 19 Jul 2025
Viewed by 557
Abstract
Background: Advanced and recurrent vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) presents a major therapeutic challenge with limited treatment options and poor outcomes. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown efficacy in other HPV-associated malignancies, but their role in VSCC remains poorly defined due to [...] Read more.
Background: Advanced and recurrent vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) presents a major therapeutic challenge with limited treatment options and poor outcomes. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown efficacy in other HPV-associated malignancies, but their role in VSCC remains poorly defined due to the rarity of the disease and limited clinical trial data. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251067565). A comprehensive literature search identified prospective clinical trials evaluating ICIs in patients with advanced, unresectable, recurrent, or metastatic VSCC. The primary outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Risk of bias was assessed using the MINORS tool. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models, with subgroup analyses based on PD-L1 status and treatment regimens (monotherapy vs. combination therapy). Results: Six non-randomized single-arm trials involving 181 patients were included. The pooled ORR was 21%, with higher response rates observed in combination therapy (46%) compared to monotherapy (11%), though not statistically significant. Median PFS and OS were 2.2 months and 6.4 months, respectively. ORRs were similar between PD-L1-positive and PD-L1-negative subgroups. A safety analysis showed treatment-related adverse events (AEs) in 73% of patients and grade ≥ 3 AEs in 23%. The incidence of treatment-related death was 3%. Conclusions: ICIs demonstrate modest but durable efficacy and an acceptable safety profile in advanced VSCC. The current evidence supports their use in selected patients. However, response variability and the lack of reliable predictive biomarkers, such as PD-L1 or HPV status, underscore the need for biomarker-driven clinical trials and improved patient selection strategies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 1808 KiB  
Systematic Review
Effectiveness and Safety of Acupuncture for Nausea and Vomiting in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Sung-A Kim, Sujung Yeo and Sabina Lim
Medicina 2025, 61(7), 1287; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61071287 - 17 Jul 2025
Viewed by 543
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Nausea and vomiting (NV) are common and distressing adverse effects among cancer patients undergoing treatment. Despite the widespread use of pharmacological antiemetics, these medications are often insufficient for controlling nausea and may cause medication interactions and side effects. Acupuncture [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Nausea and vomiting (NV) are common and distressing adverse effects among cancer patients undergoing treatment. Despite the widespread use of pharmacological antiemetics, these medications are often insufficient for controlling nausea and may cause medication interactions and side effects. Acupuncture has been proposed as a complementary therapy; however, the comprehensive analysis of its effects on NV across all emetogenic cancer treatments remains limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture in managing NV in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or surgery. Materials and Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search across three electronic databases and two clinical registry platforms from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating acupuncture for NV in cancer patients were included. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Safety outcomes were assessed based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Results: Seventeen RCTs met the inclusion criteria, with twelve studies included in the meta-analysis. Acupuncture did not demonstrate significant effects on acute nausea (RR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.84–1.15; p = 0.80) or acute vomiting (RR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.65–1.32; p = 0.67). However, it significantly reduced delayed vomiting (RR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.61–0.95; p = 0.02). Subgroup analysis demonstrated significant effects when acupuncture was administered for at least five days (RR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.39–0.81; p = 0.002). The most frequently used acupoints were PC6, ST36, CV12, LI4, LR3, and ST25. No serious adverse events related to acupuncture treatments were reported, with only minor AEs such as localized bleeding and mild bruising observed. Conclusions: Acupuncture represents a safe and effective complementary therapy for managing delayed vomiting in cancer patients receiving emetogenic treatments. Clinicians can anticipate optimal benefits from at least five days of treatment, particularly using acupoints PC6, ST36, CV12, LI4, LR3, and ST25. Further high-quality studies are needed to establish standardized treatment regimens and explore its comprehensive effects on NV. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 697 KiB  
Systematic Review
Comparative Meta-Analysis of Survival, Risk, and Treatment Efficacy in Immunotherapy for Metastatic Melanoma Using Random-, Fixed-, and Mixed-Effects Models
by Jelena Ivetić, Jovana Dedeić, Srđan Milićević, Katarina Vidojević and Marija Delić
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(14), 5017; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14145017 - 15 Jul 2025
Viewed by 324
Abstract
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have reshaped the treatment landscape of metastatic melanoma. While combination regimens often demonstrate improved response and survival compared to monotherapy, they are also associated with a higher incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Understanding the balance between benefit [...] Read more.
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have reshaped the treatment landscape of metastatic melanoma. While combination regimens often demonstrate improved response and survival compared to monotherapy, they are also associated with a higher incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Understanding the balance between benefit and risk is essential for making informed treatment decisions, especially given the variability in reported outcomes across clinical trials. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 14 clinical trials (comprising 22 treatment arms and >5000 patients) comparing ICI monotherapy (nivolumab, ipilimumab, or pembrolizumab) and combination therapy (nivolumab + ipilimumab) in advanced melanoma. Treatment-related outcomes were synthesized using fixed-effects, random-effects, or generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs), depending on study variability. Survival data were extracted from published Kaplan–Meier curves and analyzed using longitudinal GLMMs to capture trends over time. Results: Compared to monotherapy, combination immunotherapy achieved higher clinical benefit, with an overall response of 52.2% (vs. 31.6%), a five-year overall survival of 55.7% (vs. 34.3%), and a five-year progression-free survival of 39.0% (vs. 17.2%). However, this benefit came with a higher risk of toxicity: immune-related adverse events occurred in 93.2% of patients receiving combination therapy versus in 81.9% receiving monotherapy. Differences were consistent across all individual severe toxicities. Conclusions: Combination immunotherapy offers greater long-term clinical benefit than monotherapy in metastatic melanoma but at the cost of increased toxicity. By applying models adapted to study variability, we provide more reliable estimates of treatment efficacy and risk. GLMMs provide the most robust estimates and enable the modeling of survival dynamics over time. These findings support evidence-based decision-making and highlight the value of model-informed meta-analysis in oncology. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Skin Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 2845 KiB  
Article
Circulating Plasma Proteins as Biomarkers for Immunotherapy Toxicity: Insights from Proteome-Wide Mendelian Randomization and Bioinformatics Analysis
by Liansha Tang, Wenbo He, Handan Hu, Jiyan Liu and Zhike Li
Biomedicines 2025, 13(7), 1717; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13071717 - 14 Jul 2025
Viewed by 513
Abstract
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed cancer treatment, yet severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs) often necessitate immunotherapy discontinuation and cause life-threatening complications. Circulating plasma proteins, dynamically accessible and functionally linked to immunity, may predict and offer novel targets for irAEs. Methods: Leveraging [...] Read more.
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed cancer treatment, yet severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs) often necessitate immunotherapy discontinuation and cause life-threatening complications. Circulating plasma proteins, dynamically accessible and functionally linked to immunity, may predict and offer novel targets for irAEs. Methods: Leveraging multi-omics integration, we conducted bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) using protein quantitative trait loci (pQTLs) from 4998 plasma proteins and genome-wide association data of irAE phenotypes. A causal inference framework combining colocalization analysis, multivariable MR (MVMR) adjusting for body mass index (BMI) confounding, and mediation MR elucidated BMI-independent pathways. Systems biology approaches including tissue-specific expression profiling, pathway enrichment, and protein interaction network analysis revealed spatial and functional drivers of irAE pathogenesis. Results: Proteome-wide MR mapping identified eight plasma proteins (CCL20, CSF1, CXCL9, CD40, TGFβ1, CLSTN2, TNFSF12, TGFα) causally associated with all-grade irAEs, and five (CCL20, CCL25, CXCL10, ADA, TGFα) with high-grade irAEs. Colocalization prioritized CD40/TNFSF12 (all-grade) and ADA/CCL25 (high-grade) as therapeutic targets (PPH4 > 0.7). CXCL9/TNFSF12 (all-grade) and CCL25 (high-grade) exerted BMI-independent effects, suggesting intrinsic immune dysregulation mechanisms. Tissue-specific gene expression patterns, CSF1, TGFβ1 in lung, TNFSF12 in the ileum may explain organ-specific irAE vulnerabilities. High-grade irAEs correlated with compartmentalized immune dysregulation and IL-17/immunodeficiency pathway activation. Conclusions: This study establishes the causal atlas of plasma proteins in irAE pathogenesis, bridging biomarker discovery with actionable therapeutic targets. These advances align with next-generation immunotherapy goals: maximizing efficacy while taming the immune storm. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cell Biology and Pathology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1548 KiB  
Article
CD19-ReTARGTPR: A Novel Fusion Protein for Physiological Engagement of Anti-CMV Cytotoxic T Cells Against CD19-Expressing Malignancies
by Anne Paulien van Wijngaarden, Isabel Britsch, Matthias Peipp, Douwe Freerk Samplonius and Wijnand Helfrich
Cancers 2025, 17(14), 2300; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17142300 - 10 Jul 2025
Viewed by 426
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The physiological activation of cytotoxic CD8pos T cells (CTLs) relies on the engagement of the TCR/CD3 complex with cognate peptide-HLA class I (pHLA-I) on target cells, triggering cell lysis with appropriate cytokine release and minimized off-target toxicity. In contrast, current [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The physiological activation of cytotoxic CD8pos T cells (CTLs) relies on the engagement of the TCR/CD3 complex with cognate peptide-HLA class I (pHLA-I) on target cells, triggering cell lysis with appropriate cytokine release and minimized off-target toxicity. In contrast, current immunotherapies for CD19-expressing hematological malignancies, such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells and bispecific T cell engagers (BiTEs), bypass TCR/pHLA interactions, resulting in CTL hyperactivation and excessive cytokine release, which frequently cause severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Thus, there is a pressing need for T cell-based therapies that preserve physiological activation while maintaining antitumor efficacy. Methods: To address this, we developed CD19-ReTARGTPR, a novel fusion protein consisting of the immunodominant cytomegalovirus (CMV) pp65-derived peptide TPRVTGGAM (TPR) covalently presented by a soluble HLA-B*07:02/β2-microglobulin complex fused to a high-affinity CD19-targeting Fab antibody fragment. The treatment of CD19-expressing cancer cells with CD19-ReTARGTPR makes them recognizable for pre-existing anti-CMVpp65 CTLs via physiological TCR-pHLA engagement. Results: Our preclinical data demonstrate that CD19-ReTARGTPR efficiently redirects anti-CMV CTLs to eliminate CD19-expressing cancer cells, including both established cell lines and primary chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells. Unlike CD19-directed CAR T cells or the CD19/CD3 BiTE blinatumomab, CD19-ReTARGTPR mediated robust cytotoxic activity without triggering supraphysiological cytokine release. Importantly, this approach retained efficacy even against cancer cells with low CD19 expression. Conclusions: In summary, we provide a robust proof-of-concept study and show that CD19-ReTARGTPR offers a promising alternative strategy for T cell redirection, enabling the selective and effective killing of CD19-expressing malignancies while minimizing cytokine-driven toxicities through physiological CTL activation pathways. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights of Hematology in Cancer)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

16 pages, 876 KiB  
Article
The Real-World Efficacy and Side Effects of Different Nivolumab Regimens in Japanese Patients with Advanced Melanoma: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
by Ken Horisaki, Shusuke Yoshikawa, Wataru Omata, Arata Tsutsumida and Yoshio Kiyohara
Cancers 2025, 17(14), 2299; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17142299 - 10 Jul 2025
Viewed by 407
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Nivolumab is a key therapy for advanced-stage melanoma; however, limited data are available from Asian populations comparing the efficacy and side effects of four dosing regimens: 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks (3mg/kgQ2W), 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks (2mg/kgQ3W), 240 mg every [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Nivolumab is a key therapy for advanced-stage melanoma; however, limited data are available from Asian populations comparing the efficacy and side effects of four dosing regimens: 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks (3mg/kgQ2W), 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks (2mg/kgQ3W), 240 mg every 2 weeks (240mgQ2W), and 480 mg every 4 weeks (480mgQ4W). This retrospective study evaluated Japanese patients with advanced melanoma treated with various nivolumab regimens to assess the impact of dosing interval and dosage on treatment efficacy and immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Methods: We reviewed the records of 153 participants with stage IV melanoma who received nivolumab monotherapy between February 2012 and December 2024 at Shizuoka Cancer Center. Patients were categorized by nivolumab regimen, dosing interval, and dose per body weight. We then compared treatment efficacy and incidence of irAEs across groups. Results: No significant differences were observed in objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), or irAE incidence between the 240mgQ2W and 480mgQ4W groups. Similar results were observed in the 3mg/kgQ2W and 2mg/kgQ3W groups. However, participants who received nivolumab within 3 weeks exhibited a significantly higher ORR than those who received nivolumab more than 3 weeks. No significant differences were found in PFS or OS. Conclusions: The administration of nivolumab at shorter intervals may provide short-term benefits in Japanese patients with advanced melanoma. However, long-term efficacy and side effects did not differ significantly across the studied nivolumab regimens. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 1875 KiB  
Systematic Review
PARP Inhibitors for Metastatic CRPC: More Answers than Questions, a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Ray Manneh, Javier Molina-Cerrillo, Guillermo de Velasco, Linda Ibatá, Susan Martínez, Álvaro Ruiz-Granados and Teresa Alonso-Gordoa
Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18(7), 1015; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18071015 - 8 Jul 2025
Viewed by 498
Abstract
PARP inhibitors (PARPi), alone or in combination with androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSi), have shown clinical benefit in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), particularly in tumors with homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene alterations. Recent data from the TALAPRO-2 trial complete the current evidence [...] Read more.
PARP inhibitors (PARPi), alone or in combination with androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSi), have shown clinical benefit in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), particularly in tumors with homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene alterations. Recent data from the TALAPRO-2 trial complete the current evidence on PARPi–ARSi combination strategies in this setting. Background/Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of PARPi-based therapies—monotherapy and combination with ARSi—in patients with mCRPC, focusing on molecular subgroups defined by DNA repair alterations. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing PARPi as monotherapy or in combination with ARSi. Searches were performed in PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and oncology conference proceedings up to February 2025. Outcomes included radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), overall survival (OS), second progression-free survival (PFS2), and grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs). Data were pooled using a random-effects model, with subgroup analyses by DNA repair status. Results: Five RCTs (n = 2921) were I confirmincluded: three on combination therapy (n = 2271) and two on monotherapy (n = 650). Combination therapy improved rPFS in the ITT (HR = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.56–0.74), HRRm (HR = 0.55; 95% CI: 0.44–0.68), and BRCAm (HR = 0.33; 95% CI: 0.18–0.58) subgroups. OS was also improved in the ITT (HR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.70–0.92), HRRm (HR = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.55–0.83), and BRCAm (HR = 0.54; 95% CI: 0.34–0.85) groups. No benefit was observed in non-HRRm patients. PFS2 favored combination therapy (HR = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.64–0.91). Grade ≥3 AEs were more frequent (RR = 1.44; 95% CI: 1.20–1.73). Monotherapy improved rPFS in ITT (HR = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.20–0.81) and BRCAm (HR = 0.33; 95% CI: 0.15–0.75); OS benefit was seen only in BRCAm (HR = 0.73; 95% CI: 0.57–0.95). Conclusions: PARPi therapies improve outcomes mainly in HRR- and BRCA-mutated mCRPC. Molecular selection is key to optimizing benefit and minimizing toxicity. Further research on the activity of PARPi combinations in non-HRR mutated mCRPC is needed to better understand the underlying mechanisms of efficacy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Prostate Cancer Therapeutics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 5443 KiB  
Article
Impact of Early-Age Curing and Environmental Conditions on Shrinkage and Microcracking in Concrete
by Magdalena Bacharz, Kamil Bacharz and Wiesław Trąmpczyński
Materials 2025, 18(13), 3185; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18133185 - 5 Jul 2025
Viewed by 398
Abstract
This study analyzed the effects of curing and maturation on the formation of shrinkage strain and destructive processes in concrete. Experimental tests were performed on commonly used concrete, class C30/37, with basalt aggregate and blast furnace cement tested: at constant temperature after water [...] Read more.
This study analyzed the effects of curing and maturation on the formation of shrinkage strain and destructive processes in concrete. Experimental tests were performed on commonly used concrete, class C30/37, with basalt aggregate and blast furnace cement tested: at constant temperature after water curing, at constant temperature without water curing, and under cyclically changing temperature without prior curing. Shrinkage strain was measured for 46 days with an extensometer on 150 × 150 × 600 mm specimens, and the acoustic emission (AE) method was used to monitor microcracks and processes in concrete in real time. The results were compared with the model according to EN 1992-1-1:2023. It was found that this model correctly estimates shrinkage strain for wet-curing concrete, but there are discrepancies for air-dried concrete, regardless of temperature and moisture conditions (constant/variable). Correlation coefficients between shrinkage strain increments and process increments in early-age concrete are proposed. Correlations between shrinkage strain and destructive processes occurring in concrete were confirmed. It was found that by using correlation coefficients, it is possible to estimate internal damage in relation to shrinkage strain. The results indicate the need to develop guidelines for estimating shrinkage strain in non-model environmental conditions and demonstrate the usefulness of the nondestructive AE method in diagnosing early damage, especially in concrete structures exposed to adverse service conditions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Concrete and Building Materials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop