Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (184)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
27 pages, 5667 KiB  
Article
Pre-Vaccination Immune Profiles and Responsiveness to Innate Stimuli Predict Reactogenicity and Antibody Magnitude Following mRNA Vaccination
by Amanda E. Zelkoski, Emilie Goguet, Emily Samuels Darcey, Mohamad-Gabriel Alameh, Hooda Said, Simon Pollett, John H. Powers, Eric D. Laing, Cara Olsen, Edward Mitre and Allison M. W. Malloy
Vaccines 2025, 13(7), 718; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13070718 - 1 Jul 2025
Viewed by 694
Abstract
Background: While mRNA vaccines effectively limit hospitalization and severe COVID-19 disease, the precise early innate immune mechanisms associated with their efficacy and reactogenicity remain underexplored. The identification of innate immune correlates prior to vaccination could provide mechanistic insights and potentially predict responses. Methods: [...] Read more.
Background: While mRNA vaccines effectively limit hospitalization and severe COVID-19 disease, the precise early innate immune mechanisms associated with their efficacy and reactogenicity remain underexplored. The identification of innate immune correlates prior to vaccination could provide mechanistic insights and potentially predict responses. Methods: We developed an in vitro model to study the innate immune activation of pre-vaccination peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) collected from participants enrolled in a well-characterized COVID-19 BioNTech/Pfizer BNT162b2 vaccine (BNT162b2 vaccine) cohort. Pre-vaccination PBMCs were stimulated with empty lipid nanoparticle (LNP), mRNA-LNP, or Toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists. Using multiparameter spectral flow cytometry, we analyzed the baseline immune state, innate responsiveness to stimuli, and cytokine profiles of study participants. These pre-vaccination in vitro results were analyzed for correlations with post-vaccination symptoms and spike-specific IgG responses. Results: Baseline dendritic cell (DC) states inversely correlated with the magnitude of symptoms following BNT162b2 vaccination. Heightened conventional (cDC) and weaker plasmacytoid DC (pDC) responses to RNA stimuli correlated with the magnitude of an acute IgG response. IgG durability modestly correlated with a lower pDC state but higher cDC2 and monocyte baseline states and inversely correlated with TLR3 agonist responsiveness. Conclusions: The pre-vaccination assessment of innate immune function and resting states can be used to fit models potentially predictive of immunogenicity and reactogenicity to BNT162b2 vaccination. Pre-vaccination DC states may influence reactogenicity, while the response to RNA may impact antibody responses. Our data suggest that pre-vaccination assessment offers insights into the innate mechanisms driving mRNA vaccine responses and has predictive potential. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Nucleic Acid (DNA and mRNA) Vaccines)
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 1095 KiB  
Case Report
A Rare Case of Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis Following the Second Dose of BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine—Just a Coincidence? A Case Report
by David Matyáš, Roman Herzig, Libor Šimůnek and Mohamed Abuhajar
Reports 2025, 8(2), 50; https://doi.org/10.3390/reports8020050 - 16 Apr 2025
Viewed by 1083
Abstract
Background and Clinical Significance: The occurrence of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST), both with or without thrombocytopenia, following COVID-19 vaccination, is well documented and more common in recipients of vector vaccines. Cases of CVST following immunization with the COVID-19 messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine [...] Read more.
Background and Clinical Significance: The occurrence of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST), both with or without thrombocytopenia, following COVID-19 vaccination, is well documented and more common in recipients of vector vaccines. Cases of CVST following immunization with the COVID-19 messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine are rare; most of these cases occur within 28 days of the first dose of the vaccine. Case Presentation: We present the case of a 38-year-old male with a history of two episodes of deep vein thrombosis in the lower limbs, but without a specific thrombophilic condition, who developed CVST 13 days after the second dose of the Pfizer/BioNTech BNT162b2 vaccine. He suffered from diffuse tension-type headache of progressively increasing intensity, and his objective neurological findings were normal. Magnetic resonance venography showed thrombosis of the transverse and right sigmoid sinuses, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain revealed no cerebral infarction. Two months later, a follow-up MR venography showed partial recanalization of the affected sinuses, and a brain MRI showed no infarction. Conclusions: Given the temporal sequence and the absence of other possible causes, we speculate that the second dose of the COVID-19 BNT162b2 vaccine may have triggered the development of CVST. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Neurology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 202 KiB  
Article
COVID-19 Vaccination and Acute Anterior Uveitis—A Case Control Study
by Asaf Shemer, Amit Toledano, Aya Altarescu, Biana Dubinsky-Pertzov, Assaf Rozenberg, Idan Hecht, Adi Einan-Lifshitz and Eran Pras
Vaccines 2025, 13(2), 176; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13020176 - 12 Feb 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 851
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the association between the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech®) coronavirus disease vaccine and new-onset anterior uveitis. Methods: A retrospective case control study of patients admitted and diagnosed with new-onset acute anterior uveitis, and matched controls admitted for other reasons (1:3 ratio), [...] Read more.
Objective: To evaluate the association between the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech®) coronavirus disease vaccine and new-onset anterior uveitis. Methods: A retrospective case control study of patients admitted and diagnosed with new-onset acute anterior uveitis, and matched controls admitted for other reasons (1:3 ratio), was completed. Rates of exposure to the BNT162b2 vaccine were compared between groups, and odds ratios for exposure to the vaccine were calculated. A secondary analysis of the overall number of patients with new-onset anterior uveitis in the six preceding years was conducted. This study was conducted in one academic center in Israel. Results: A total of 16 patients were admitted for acute anterior uveitis during the study period. Of the 16 cases, 11 (69%) received the first dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine prior to presentation and 8 (50%) also received the second dose. This compares to 39 (81.2%) in the control group. The odds ratio for exposure to the vaccine among cases was 0.508 (95% confidence interval 0.141–1.829, p = 0.300). Compared with preceding years, the rate of cases diagnosed with acute anterior uveitis in 2021 was similar to the six preceding years (mean 11.8 ± 3.4 cases). Conclusions: In this case control study and comparison with preceding years, we found no evidence to suggest an association between vaccination with the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech®) COVID-19 vaccine and new-onset acute anterior uveitis. Full article
10 pages, 916 KiB  
Case Report
Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome Associated with BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine in a Kidney Transplant Recipient: A Case Report and Literature Review
by Eleonora Francesca Pattonieri, Marilena Gregorini, Maria Antonietta Grignano, Tefik Islami, Gioacchino D’Ambrosio, Gianluigi Ardissino and Teresa Rampino
Infect. Dis. Rep. 2025, 17(1), 14; https://doi.org/10.3390/idr17010014 - 11 Feb 2025
Viewed by 1198
Abstract
Case Report: We report a case of a 37-year-old female with kidney transplant, who was admitted at our hospital due to worsening renal function, nephrotic proteinuria, and anemia developed 21 days after the second dose of BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech). Laboratory tests revealed [...] Read more.
Case Report: We report a case of a 37-year-old female with kidney transplant, who was admitted at our hospital due to worsening renal function, nephrotic proteinuria, and anemia developed 21 days after the second dose of BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech). Laboratory tests revealed hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and acute kidney injury. Given the clinical picture of Thrombotic Micro-angiopathy (TMA) and severe renal impairment, plasma exchange (PEX) and dialysis were immediately started. Laboratory workup showed low C3 and C4 levels, normal activity of ADAMTS13, and the absence of anti-factor H antibodies. Molecular biology investigations revealed a heterozygous variant in exon 22 (SCR20) of the CFH gene (c.3628C>T; p.Arg1210Cys) described as an atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (aHUS) causative mutation. Our patient completed two sessions of PEX followed by eculizumab treatment with hematological improvement but no recovery of renal function. This is the first reported case of aHUS triggered by SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in a kidney transplant patient without recovery of renal function. Conclusion: Although rare, clinicians should be aware of possible nephrological complications that may appear after vaccination. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Immunology and Vaccines)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 892 KiB  
Article
Immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Schedules Including a Booster Dose in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Data from a Prospective Multicenter Study
by Natália Sarzi Sartori, Ketty Lysie Libardi Lira Machado, Samira Tatiyama Miyamoto, Flávia Zon Pretti, Maria da Penha Gomes Gouveia, Yasmin Gurtler Pinheiro de Oliveira, Vanezia Gonçalves da Silva, Filipe Faé, Ana Paula Neves Burian, Karina Rosemarie Lallemand Tapia, Anna Carolina Simões Moulin, Luiza Lorenzoni Grillo, Paula dos Santos Athayde, Helena da Silva Corona, Sabrina de Souza Ramos, Flávia Maria Matos Melo Campos Peixoto, Priscila Dias Cardoso Ribeiro, Vanessa de Oliveira Magalhães, Mariana Freitas de Aguiar, Erika Biegelmeyer, Cristiane Kayser, Alexandre Wagner Silva de Souza, Charlles Heldan de Moura Castro, Juliana Bühring, Sandra Lúcia Euzébio Ribeiro, Sérgio Henrique Oliveira dos Santos, Clara Pinheiro Martins, Jonathan Willian da Silva Rodrigues, Marcos Mavignier Sousa Dias, Bruna Guimarães Dutra, Camila Maria Paiva França Telles, Samuel Elias Basualto Dias, Rodrigo Poubel Vieira de Rezende, Katia Lino Baptista, Rodrigo Cutrim Gaudio, Ana Karla Guedes de Melo, Valéria Bezerra da Silva, Vitor Alves Cruz, Jozelia Rêgo, Rejane Maria Rodrigues de Abreu Vieira, Adah Sophia Rodrigues Vieira, Adriana Maria Kakehasi, Anna Carolina Faria Moreira Gomes Tavares, Victória Dornelas Paz Carvalho, Renata Henriques de Azevedo, Valderilio Feijó Azevedo, Olindo Assis Martins-Filho, Vanessa Peruhype-Magalhães, Andrese Aline Gasparin, Vanessa Hax, Valéria Valim, Gilda Aparecida Ferreira, Andréa Teixeira-Carvalho, Edgard Torres dos Reis-Neto, Emília Inoue Sato, Marcelo de Medeiros Pinheiro, Viviane Angelina de Souza, Ricardo Machado Xavier, Gecilmara Salviato Pileggi and Odirlei André Monticieloadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Vaccines 2025, 13(2), 127; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13020127 - 27 Jan 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1355
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the humoral response to and impact of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in a multicenter cohort design. Methods: Data for this analysis were obtained from the Study of Safety, Effectiveness and Duration of Immunity after Vaccination against [...] Read more.
Objective: To evaluate the humoral response to and impact of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in a multicenter cohort design. Methods: Data for this analysis were obtained from the Study of Safety, Effectiveness and Duration of Immunity after Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in Patients with Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases (SAFER), a prospective, multicenter, phase IV, real-world study conducted across different regions of Brazil from June/2021 to March/2024. Patients aged >18 years with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who received any one of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines approved by the Brazilian health regulatory agency (CoronaVac [inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine], ChAdOx-1 [AstraZeneca], or BNT162b2 [Pfizer-BioNTech]) were included. Immunogenicity was assessed in pre- and post-vaccination blood samples, and patients were monitored in person and remotely for the occurrence and severity of COVID-19. Results: Two hundred and thirty-five patients with SLE who had completed their vaccination schedules (two doses + booster dose) were included in this study. Most patients were female (89.3%) and had low disease activity or were in remission (72.4%); the majority were also on some form of immunosuppressive therapy (58.1%). One hundred and sixteen patients received two doses of CoronaVac followed by one dose of BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine, eighty-seven received two doses of ChAdOx1-S (AstraZeneca) followed by one dose of BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine, and thirty-two received three doses of BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine. Twenty-eight cases of COVID-19, none meeting criteria for severe COVID-19, were recorded in patients with respiratory symptoms after the second dose of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Regarding immunogenicity, an increase in seroconversion rate was observed following consecutive vaccine doses, with no difference between vaccination schedules, reaching 97.57% seropositivity after a booster dose. The geometric mean IgG titers differed between the different vaccination schedules after the first and the second vaccine dose, being lowest for the CoronaVac-based schedule, but titers were similar after the administration of a booster dose. Conclusion: In patients with SLE, SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are immunogenic, inducing a robust humoral response. No severe outcomes associated with death or hospitalization were found in the evaluated patient sample. Complete vaccination schedules including a booster dose induced higher humoral responses than incomplete schedules, especially in patients initially immunized with an inactivated virus vaccine schedule and those with a suboptimal humoral response. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 441 KiB  
Review
Pemphigus and Bullous Pemphigoid Following COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review
by Fabrizio Martora, Teresa Battista, Luca Potestio, Maddalena Napolitano, Cataldo Patruno, Matteo Megna and Michela D’Agostino
Viruses 2024, 16(12), 1896; https://doi.org/10.3390/v16121896 - 9 Dec 2024
Viewed by 2750
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has encouraged the rapid development and licensing of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. Currently, numerous vaccines are available on a global scale and are based on different mechanisms of action, including mRNA technology, viral vectors, inactive viruses, and subunit particles. Mass vaccination [...] Read more.
The COVID-19 pandemic has encouraged the rapid development and licensing of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. Currently, numerous vaccines are available on a global scale and are based on different mechanisms of action, including mRNA technology, viral vectors, inactive viruses, and subunit particles. Mass vaccination conducted worldwide has highlighted the potential development of side effects, including ones with skin involvement. This review synthesizes data from 62 manuscripts, reporting a total of 142 cases of autoimmune blistering skin diseases (AIBDs) following COVID-19 vaccination, comprising 59 cases of pemphigus and 83 cases of bullous pemphigoid. Among the 83 bullous pemphigoid cases, 78 were BP, with additional cases including 2 oral mucous membrane pemphigoid, 1 pemphigoid gestationis, 1 anti-p200 BP, and 1 dyshidrosiform BP. The mean age of affected individuals was 72 ± 12.7 years, with an average symptom onset of 11 ± 10.8 days post-vaccination. Notably, 59% of cases followed vaccination with BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech), 51.8% were new diagnoses, and 45.8% occurred after the second dose. The purpose of our review is to analyze the cases of pemphigus and bullous pemphigoid associated with COVID-19 vaccination and to investigate the pathogenetic mechanisms underlying the new development or flare-up of these diseases in association with vaccination. Our results show that the association between COVID-19 vaccines and AIBDs is a possible event. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cutaneous Reactions Following Virus Infections and Antiviral Vaccines)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 2094 KiB  
Article
Immunogenicity and Safety According to Immunosuppressive Drugs and Different COVID-19 Vaccine Platforms in Immune-Mediated Disease: Data from SAFER Cohort
by Ketty Lysie Libardi Lira Machado, Ana Paula Neves Burian, Olindo Assis Martins-Filho, José Geraldo Mill, Lunara Baptista Ferreira, Karina Rosemarie Lallemand Tapia, Anna Carolina Simões Moulin, Isac Ribeiro Moulaz, Priscila Dias Cardoso Ribeiro, Vanessa de Oliveira Magalhães, Erika Biegelmeyer, Flávia Maria Matos Melo Campos Peixoto, Sandra Lúcia Euzébio Ribeiro, Camila Maria Paiva França Telles, Juliana Bühring, Natalia Sarzi Sartorio, Vanessa Hax, Rodrigo Poubel Vieira de Rezende, Katia Lino Baptista, Ana Karla Guedes de Melo, Vitor Alves Cruz, Rejane Maria Rodrigues de Abreu Vieira, Renata Henriques de Azevedo, Valderilio Feijó Azevedo, Marcelo de Medeiros Pinheiro, Odirlei André Monticielo, Edgard Torres Dos Reis Neto, Andréa Teixeira-Carvalho, Ricardo Machado Xavier, Emilia Inoue Sato, Viviane Angelina de Souza, Gilda Aparecida Ferreira, Gecilmara Salviato Pileggi and Valeria Valimadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Vaccines 2024, 12(12), 1367; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12121367 - 3 Dec 2024
Viewed by 1489
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccine in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID) depends on the underlying disease, immunosuppression degree and the vaccine regimens. We evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of different COVID-19 vaccine schedules. Methods: The SAFER study: “Safety and effectiveness of [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccine in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID) depends on the underlying disease, immunosuppression degree and the vaccine regimens. We evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of different COVID-19 vaccine schedules. Methods: The SAFER study: “Safety and effectiveness of the COVID-19 Vaccine in Rheumatic Disease”, is a Brazilian multicentric prospective observational phase IV study in the real-life. Data were analyzed after 2 or 3 doses of COVID-19 vaccines: adenoviral vectored vaccine (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, Astrazeneca), mRNA vaccine (BNT162b2, Pfizer–BioNTech) or inactivated SARS-COV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac, Sinovac Biotech). IgG antibody against SARS-CoV-2 spike (IgG-S) receptor-binding domain level were quantified at baseline (T1) and 28 days after the first (T2), 2nd (T3) and 3rd (T4) doses by chemiluminescence (SARS-CoV-2-IgG-II Quant-assay, Abbott-Laboratories). Results: 721 patients with IMID were included in the analysis. The median titers of IgG-S (BAU/mL) increased progressively over the times: at baseline was 6.26 (5.41–7.24), T2: 73.01 (61.53–86.62), T3: 200.0 (174.36–229.41) and T4: 904.92 (800.49–1022.97). The multivariate linear regression showed that greater IgG-S titers were associated with pre-exposure to COVID-19 (p < 0.001) and BNT162b2 booster vaccine (p < 0.001). Rituximab and immunosuppressant drugs were independent factors for low titers (p = 0.002, p < 0.001, respectively). No serious adverse event was reported. Conclusions: All platforms were safe and induced an increase in IgG-S antibodies. COVID-19 pre-exposure and BNT162b2 booster regimens were predictors of higher humoral immune responses, which is relevant in immunosuppressed populations. Immunosuppressants (mainly rituximab) predicted the lowest antibodies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue COVID-19 Vaccine-Associated Autoimmune Diseases and Disorders)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 1026 KiB  
Article
Antibody Response to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines in Transplant Recipients and Hemodialysis Patients: Data from the Dominican Republic
by Lisette Alcantara Sanchez, Eloy Alvarez Guerra, Dongmei Li, Samantha M. King, Shannon P. Hilchey, Qian Zhou, Stephen Dewhurst, Kevin Fiscella and Martin S. Zand
Vaccines 2024, 12(12), 1312; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12121312 - 23 Nov 2024
Viewed by 1581
Abstract
Background: The global COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in approximately 7 million deaths and a historic vaccination effort, with over 13.6 billion doses administered. Despite this, understanding of immune responses in vulnerable populations, such as transplant recipients (TR) and hemodialysis patients (HD), remains [...] Read more.
Background: The global COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in approximately 7 million deaths and a historic vaccination effort, with over 13.6 billion doses administered. Despite this, understanding of immune responses in vulnerable populations, such as transplant recipients (TR) and hemodialysis patients (HD), remains limited, especially outside the US and Europe. Methods: To address this gap, we analyzed blood samples and deidentified data from the Instituto Nacional de Coordinación de Trasplante (INCORT) in The Dominican Republic, measuring antibody levels to SARS-CoV-2 post-infection and vaccination with BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and Sinovac-CoronaVac (Sinovac) in TR, HD, and healthy controls (CO). Using a fluorescent multiplex assay (mPlex-CoV) and mixed-effects modeling, we assessed variations in anti-S, anti-RBD, and anti-N IgG antibodies. Results: The results indicate that the CO group experienced an early peak in anti-S and anti-RBD antibodies, followed by stabilization. In contrast, the TR and HD groups showed a slower, gradual increase in antibodies. Despite fluctuations in the HD group, both the TR and HD groups maintained high anti-S and anti-RBD IgG levels, indicating a back-boosting effect from vaccination. However, elevated anti-N IgG levels in the TR and HD groups suggest potential reinfections. Additionally, prior SARS-CoV-2 infection led to higher anti-S IgG levels, with BNT162b2 associated with higher anti-S IgG and CoronaVac associated with higher anti-N IgG levels. Conclusion: These findings highlight the variability in antibody responses and the need for targeted public health strategies to diverse immunological profiles. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

36 pages, 3132 KiB  
Review
The Ambivalence of Post COVID-19 Vaccination Responses in Humans
by Radha Gopalaswamy, Vivekanandhan Aravindhan and Selvakumar Subbian
Biomolecules 2024, 14(10), 1320; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom14101320 - 17 Oct 2024
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 4692
Abstract
The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), has prompted a massive global vaccination campaign, leading to the rapid development and deployment of several vaccines. Various COVID-19 vaccines are under different phases of clinical trials and include [...] Read more.
The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), has prompted a massive global vaccination campaign, leading to the rapid development and deployment of several vaccines. Various COVID-19 vaccines are under different phases of clinical trials and include the whole virus or its parts like DNA, mRNA, or protein subunits administered directly or through vectors. Beginning in 2020, a few mRNA (Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 and Moderna mRNA-1273) and adenovirus-based (AstraZeneca ChAdOx1-S and the Janssen Ad26.COV2.S) vaccines were recommended by WHO for emergency use before the completion of the phase 3 and 4 trials. These vaccines were mostly administered in two or three doses at a defined frequency between the two doses. While these vaccines, mainly based on viral nucleic acids or protein conferred protection against the progression of SARS-CoV-2 infection into severe COVID-19, and prevented death due to the disease, their use has also been accompanied by a plethora of side effects. Common side effects include localized reactions such as pain at the injection site, as well as systemic reactions like fever, fatigue, and headache. These symptoms are generally mild to moderate and resolve within a few days. However, rare but more serious side effects have been reported, including allergic reactions such as anaphylaxis and, in some cases, myocarditis or pericarditis, particularly in younger males. Ongoing surveillance and research efforts continue to refine the understanding of these adverse effects, providing critical insights into the risk-benefit profile of COVID-19 vaccines. Nonetheless, the overall safety profile supports the continued use of these vaccines in combating the pandemic, with regulatory agencies and health organizations emphasizing the importance of vaccination in preventing COVID-19’s severe outcomes. In this review, we describe different types of COVID-19 vaccines and summarize various adverse effects due to autoimmune and inflammatory response(s) manifesting predominantly as cardiac, hematological, neurological, and psychological dysfunctions. The incidence, clinical presentation, risk factors, diagnosis, and management of different adverse effects and possible mechanisms contributing to these effects are discussed. The review highlights the potential ambivalence of human response post-COVID-19 vaccination and necessitates the need to mitigate the adverse side effects. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 840 KiB  
Article
Predictors of Hospitalization in Breakthrough COVID-19 among Fully Vaccinated Individuals with Immune-Mediated Rheumatic Diseases: Data from SAFER-Study
by Débora Cerqueira Calderaro, Valéria Valim, Gilda Aparecida Ferreira, Ketty Lysie Libardi Lira Machado, Priscila Dias Cardoso Ribeiro, Sandra Lúcia Euzébio Ribeiro, Natalia Sarzi Sartori, Rodrigo Poubel Vieira de Rezende, Ana Karla Guedes de Melo, Vitor Alves Cruz, Adah Sophia Rodrigues Vieira, Adriana Maria Kakehasi, Aline Teixeira de Landa, Ana Paula Neves Burian, Flávia Maria Matos Melo Campos Peixoto, Camila Maria Paiva França Telles, Rafaela Cavalheiro do Espírito Santo, Katia Lino Baptista, Yasmin Gurtler Pinheiro de Oliveira, Vanessa de Oliveira Magalhães, Raquel Lima de Lima, Erika Biegelmeyer, Pietra Zava Lorencini, Andréa Teixeira-Carvalho, Edgard Torres dos Reis-Neto, Emília Inoue Sato, Marcelo de Medeiros Pinheiro, Odirlei André Monticielo, Viviane Angelina de Souza, Ricardo Machado Xavier and Gecilmara Salviato Pileggiadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Vaccines 2024, 12(9), 1031; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12091031 - 9 Sep 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2052
Abstract
Breakthrough COVID-19 (occurring in fully vaccinated people) has been described. Data on its characteristics among immune-mediated rheumatic disease (IMRD) patients are scarce. This study describes breakthrough COVID-19 occurring in IMRD patients participating in the SAFER-study, a Brazilian multicentric cohort evaluating the safety, effectiveness, [...] Read more.
Breakthrough COVID-19 (occurring in fully vaccinated people) has been described. Data on its characteristics among immune-mediated rheumatic disease (IMRD) patients are scarce. This study describes breakthrough COVID-19 occurring in IMRD patients participating in the SAFER-study, a Brazilian multicentric cohort evaluating the safety, effectiveness, and immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with autoimmune diseases. A descriptive analysis of the population and a binary logistic regression model were performed to evaluate the predictors of COVID-19-related hospitalization. A p-value < 0.05 was significant. The included 160 patients were predominantly females (83.1%), with a mean (SD) age of 40.23 (13.19) years. The patients received two (19%), three (70%), or four (11%) vaccine doses. The initial two-dose series was mainly with ChAdOx1 (Oxford/AstraZeneca) (58%) or BBIBP-CorV (Sinopharm-Beijing) (34%). The first booster (n = 150) was with BNT162b2 (BioNtech/Fosun Pharma/Pfizer) (63%) or ChAdOx1 (29%). The second booster (n = 112) was with BNT162b2 (40%) or ChAdOx1 (26%). The COVID-19 hospitalization rate was 17.5%. IMRD moderate/high activity (OR: 5.84; CI: 1.9–18.5; p = 0.002) and treatment with corticosteroids (OR: 2.94; CI: 1.02–8.49; p = 0.0043) were associated with higher odds of hospitalization, while increasing the number of vaccine doses was protective (OR: 0.37; CI: 0.15–0.9; p = 0.032). These findings, along with previous reassuring results about the safety of the COVID-19 vaccines, argue in favor of booster vaccination in IMRD patients. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 407 KiB  
Brief Report
Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) Vaccine Effectiveness against Symptomatic Laboratory-Confirmed COVID-19 Infection among Outpatients in Sentinel Sites, Lebanon, July–December 2021
by Lina Chaito, Pawel Stefanoff, Joaquin Baruch, Zeina Farah, Mona Albuaini and Nada Ghosn
Vaccines 2024, 12(9), 954; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12090954 - 23 Aug 2024
Viewed by 1247
Abstract
On 14 February 2021, Lebanon implemented nationwide vaccination, offering the Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) vaccine to adults over 50 years of age. We estimated the effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine in preventing symptomatic laboratory-confirmed COVID-19. We conducted a test-negative case–control (TND) study among symptomatic adults [...] Read more.
On 14 February 2021, Lebanon implemented nationwide vaccination, offering the Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) vaccine to adults over 50 years of age. We estimated the effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine in preventing symptomatic laboratory-confirmed COVID-19. We conducted a test-negative case–control (TND) study among symptomatic adults aged 50 years and older who presented with influenza-like illness (ILI) or COVID-19-like illness (CLI) in surveillance sentinel sites between 1 July and 31 December 2021. Unvaccinated participants did not receive any vaccine dose before symptom onset. Vaccinated participants received at least one dose within 14 days before onset of symptoms. We estimated vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic laboratory-confirmed COVID-19, adjusted for demographic and behavioral factors, using multivariable logistic regression. Out of 457 participants with symptoms, 150 (33%) were positive and 307 (67%) were negative for SARS-CoV-2. Adjusted vaccine effectiveness was 22% (95% CI: −70–65%) for those partially vaccinated and 44% (95% CI: 6–67%) for those fully vaccinated. Vaccination with two doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine was effective in preventing COVID-19 symptomatic illness in the older population. Vaccine effectiveness was lower for those partially vaccinated. We recommend enhancing vaccine uptake with at least one dose among risk groups for COVID-19 and keeping general recommendations on contact and droplet precautions in the general population. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section COVID-19 Vaccines and Vaccination)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1992 KiB  
Article
Booster Vaccination with BNT162b2 Improves Cellular and Humoral Immune Response in the Pediatric Population Immunized with CoronaVac
by Diego A. Díaz-Dinamarca, Simone Cárdenas-Cáceres, Nicolás A. Muena, Pablo Díaz, Gisselle Barra, Rodrigo Puentes, Daniel F. Escobar, Michal Díaz-Samirin, Natalia T. Santis-Alay, Cecilia Canales, Janepsy Díaz, Heriberto E. García-Escorza, Alba Grifoni, Alessandro Sette, Nicole D. Tischler and Abel E. Vasquez
Vaccines 2024, 12(8), 919; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12080919 - 15 Aug 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1891
Abstract
The SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant and its sublineages continue to cause COVID-19-associated pediatric hospitalizations, severe disease, and death globally. BNT162b2 and CoronaVac are the main vaccines used in Chile. Much less is known about the Wuhan-Hu-1 strain-based vaccines in the pediatric population compared to [...] Read more.
The SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant and its sublineages continue to cause COVID-19-associated pediatric hospitalizations, severe disease, and death globally. BNT162b2 and CoronaVac are the main vaccines used in Chile. Much less is known about the Wuhan-Hu-1 strain-based vaccines in the pediatric population compared to adults. Given the worldwide need for booster vaccinations to stimulate the immune response against new Omicron variants of SARS-CoV-2, we characterized the humoral and cellular immune response against Omicron variant BA.1 in a pediatric cohort aged 10 to 16 years who received heterologous vaccination based on two doses of CoronaVac, two doses of CoronaVac (2x) plus one booster dose of BNT162b2 [CoronaVac(2x) + BNT162b2 (1x)], two doses of CoronaVac plus two booster doses of BNT162b2 [CoronaVac(2x) + BNT162b2 (2x)], and three doses of BNT162b2. We observed that the [CoronaVac(2x) + BNT162b2 (2x)] vaccination showed higher anti-S1 and neutralizing antibody titers and CD4 and CD8 T cell immunity specific to the Omicron variant compared to immunization with two doses of CoronaVac alone. Furthermore, from all groups tested, immunity against Omicron was highest in individuals who received three doses of BNT162b2. We conclude that booster vaccination with BNT162b2, compared to two doses of CoronaVac alone, induces a greater protective immunity. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Humoral and Cellular Response after COVID-19 Vaccination)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 3307 KiB  
Article
Role of Extracellular Vesicles in Crohn’s Patients on Adalimumab Who Received COVID-19 Vaccination
by Maria De Luca, Biagia Musio, Francesco Balestra, Valentina Arrè, Roberto Negro, Nicoletta Depalo, Federica Rizzi, Rita Mastrogiacomo, Giorgia Panzetta, Rossella Donghia, Pasqua Letizia Pesole, Sergio Coletta, Emanuele Piccinno, Viviana Scalavino, Grazia Serino, Fatima Maqoud, Francesco Russo, Antonella Orlando, Stefano Todisco, Pietro Mastrorilli, Maria Lucia Curri, Vito Gallo, Gianluigi Giannelli and Maria Principia Scavoadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(16), 8853; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25168853 - 14 Aug 2024
Viewed by 1762
Abstract
Crohn’s disease (CD) is a type of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) affecting the gastrointestinal tract that can also cause extra-intestinal complications. Following exposure to the mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) encoding the SARS-CoV-2 Spike (S) protein, some patients experienced a lack of response to [...] Read more.
Crohn’s disease (CD) is a type of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) affecting the gastrointestinal tract that can also cause extra-intestinal complications. Following exposure to the mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) encoding the SARS-CoV-2 Spike (S) protein, some patients experienced a lack of response to the biological drug Adalimumab and a recrudescence of the disease. In CD patients in progression, resistant to considered biological therapy, an abnormal increase in intestinal permeability was observed, more often with a modulated expression of different proteins such as Aquaporin 8 (AQP8) and in tight junctions (e.g., ZO-1, Claudin1, Claudin2, Occludin), especially during disease flares. The aim of this study is to investigate how the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine could interfere with IBD therapy and contribute to disease exacerbation. We investigated the role of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein, transported by extracellular vesicles (EVs), and the impact of various EVs components, namely, exosomes (EXOs) and microvesicles (MVs), in modulating the expression of molecules involved in the exacerbation of CD, which remains unknown. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Immunology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1164 KiB  
Article
Humoral and Innate Immunological Profile of Paediatric Recipients of Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccine
by Sundararaj Stanleyraj Jeremiah, Priya Das, Manu Venkatesan, Reem Albinzayed, Aysha Ahmed, Nigel John Stevenson, Martin Corbally, Manaf Alqahtani, Fatima Al-Wedaie, Eman Farid and Suha Hejres
Microorganisms 2024, 12(7), 1389; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12071389 - 9 Jul 2024
Viewed by 2031
Abstract
The Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine was one of the essential tools in curtailing the COVID-19 pandemic. Unlike conventional vaccines, this newly approved mRNA vaccine is taken up by cells, which leads to the synthesis of the specific viral Spike antigen. The vaccine was initially introduced [...] Read more.
The Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine was one of the essential tools in curtailing the COVID-19 pandemic. Unlike conventional vaccines, this newly approved mRNA vaccine is taken up by cells, which leads to the synthesis of the specific viral Spike antigen. The vaccine was initially introduced for adults, and the immunological profile of adult recipients is well-characterized. The vaccine was approved for paediatric use much later after its efficacy and safety had been confirmed in children. However, the complete picture of how the paediatric immune system in children reacts to the vaccine is not well documented. Therefore, in order to better understand the immune response in children, we analysed the humoral response, immune cell count, and interferon signalling in paediatric vaccine recipients ranging between 5 and 17 years of age. Our findings suggest that the paediatric recipients elicit a robust humoral response that is sustained for at least three months. We also found that the vaccine triggered a transient lymphocytopenia similar to that observed during viral infection. Interestingly, we also found that the vaccine may sensitise the interferon signalling pathway, priming the cells to mount a potent response when exposed to interferons during a subsequent infection. The study offers new insights into the workings of the paediatric immune system and innate immunity, thereby opening the doors for further research in this field. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Microbiology and Immunology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 1113 KiB  
Case Report
Treatment and Rehabilitation of a Patient with Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder-Induced Complete Spinal Cord Injury Following COVID-19 Vaccination: A Case Report
by Jun-Sang Han, Seong-Mun Ryu, Young-Hwan Lim, Ae-Ryoung Kim and Tae-Du Jung
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(4), 1175; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13041175 - 19 Feb 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 4232
Abstract
Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disease (NMOSD) is a rare autoimmune disorder of the central nervous system characterized by optic neuritis, myelitis, or brain lesions. Its symptoms overlap with those of multiple sclerosis (MS), making a diagnosis of NMOSD challenging. Here, we report a rare [...] Read more.
Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disease (NMOSD) is a rare autoimmune disorder of the central nervous system characterized by optic neuritis, myelitis, or brain lesions. Its symptoms overlap with those of multiple sclerosis (MS), making a diagnosis of NMOSD challenging. Here, we report a rare case of NMOSD-induced complete spinal cord injury following COVID-19 vaccination. A 52-year-old female patient developed NMOSD-induced complete spinal cord injury after receiving their third dose of the Pfizer–BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine (BNT162b2). Despite the initial diagnosis of complete spinal cord injury, the patient underwent intensive treatment, including rituximab therapy and rehabilitation. As a result, she made a full recovery and transitioned from the ASIA Impairment Scale(AIS)-A to AIS-E. The remarkable neurological recovery from complete spinal cord injury to functional independence highlights the efficacy of a comprehensive treatment approach. In addition, this case emphasizes the need to recognize NMOSD as a potential adverse outcome of COVID-19 vaccination and emphasizes the importance of early diagnosis, timely intervention, and thorough rehabilitation for optimizing patient results. Further case reports and studies are needed to investigate the association between COVID-19 vaccination and the occurrence of NMOSD. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Rehabilitation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop